Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 23(1): 58-61, 2019 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395421

RESUMEN

For more than three decades, Brazilian Clinical Embryologists have been working without specific regulations and following the standards adopted by other healthcare professionals. This document aims to guide behavior and decision-making, while providing directions to embryologist with the purpose of aiding professionals involved with assisted reproduction procedures and their patients. The Code of Ethics and Conduct is an important breakthrough and the first step toward regulating Clinical Embryology as a profession.


Asunto(s)
Códigos de Ética , Embriología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Embriología/ética , Embriología/organización & administración , Embriología/normas , Humanos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/normas
5.
Hum Reprod ; 31(4): 685-6, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908842

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Which recommendations can be provided by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Special Interest Group (ESHRE SIG) Embryology to support laboratory specialists in the organization and management of IVF laboratories and the optimization of IVF patient care? SUMMARY ANSWER: Structured in 13 sections, the guideline development group formulated recommendations for good practice in the organization and management of IVF laboratories, and for good practice of the specific procedures performed within the IVF laboratory. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: NA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The guideline was produced by a group of 10 embryologists representing different European countries, settings and levels of expertise. The group evaluated the document of 2008, and based on this assessment, each group member rewrote one or more sections. Two 2-day meetings were organized during which each of the recommendations was discussed and rewritten until consensus within the guideline group was reached. After finalizing the draft, the members of the ESHRE SIG embryology were invited to review the guideline. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: NA. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The guideline provides recommendations on the general organization of an IVF laboratory (staffing and direction, quality management, laboratory safety), and on the specific aspects of the procedures performed in IVF laboratories (Identification of patients and traceability of their reproductive cells, consumables, handling of biological material, oocyte retrieval, sperm preparation, insemination of oocytes, scoring for fertilization, embryo culture and transfer, and cryopreservation). A last section provides recommendations regarding an Emergency plan for IVF laboratories. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Evidence on most of the issues described is scarce, and therefore it was decided not to perform a formal search for and assessment of scientific evidence. However, recommendations published in the EUTCD and relevant and recent documents, manuals and consensus papers were taken into account when formulating the recommendations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the limitations, the guideline group is confident that this document will be helpful to directors and managers involved in the management and organization of IVF laboratories, but also to embryologists and laboratory technicians performing daily tasks. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings. The guideline group members did not receive payment. Dr Coticchio reports speaker's fees from IBSA and Cook, outside the submitted work; Dr Lundin reports grants from Vitrolife, personal fees from Merck Serono, non-financial support from Unisense, outside the submitted work; Dr. Rienzi reports personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from MSD, grants from GFI, outside the submitted work; the other authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Criopreservación/métodos , Criopreservación/normas , Técnicas de Cultivo de Embriones/normas , Embriología/organización & administración , Urgencias Médicas , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Recuperación del Oocito/métodos , Recuperación del Oocito/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Preservación de Semen/métodos , Preservación de Semen/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...