Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.412
Filtrar
1.
J Emerg Med ; 66(6): e704-e713, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734547

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is considered an important quality indicator for older adults seen in the ambulatory care setting. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pattern of potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) use as specified in the Beers Criteria, for older adults during emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. METHODS: Using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) we identified older adults (age 65 or older) discharged home from an ED visit in 2019. We defined PIMs as those with an 'avoid' recommendation under the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) 2019 Beers Criteria in older adults. Logistic regression models were used to assess demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with the use of any PIMs upon ED discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 5.9% of visits by older adults discharged from the ED included administration or prescriptions for PIMs. Among those who received any PIMs, 25.5% received benzodiazepines, 42.5 % received anticholinergics, 1.4% received nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, and 0.5% received barbiturates. A multivariable model showed statistically significant associations for age 65 to 74 (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39-2.62 vs. age >=75), dementia (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.95), lower immediacy (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.56-3.84 vs. higher immediacy), and Northeastern rural region (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55 vs. Midwestern rural). CONCLUSION: We found that younger age and lower immediacy were associated with increased prescriptions of PIMs for older adults seen, while dementia and Northeastern rural region was associated with reduced use of PIMs seen and discharged from EDs in United States.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos
2.
J Emerg Med ; 66(5): e562-e570, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fewer than one-half of U.S. adults with hypertension (HTN) have it controlled and one-third are unaware of their condition. The emergency department (ED) represents a setting to improve HTN control by increasing awareness of asymptomatic hypertension (aHTN) according to the 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians asymptomatic elevated blood pressure clinical policy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence and management of aHTN in U.S. EDs. METHODS: We examined the 2016-2019 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys to provide a more valid estimate of aHTN visits in U.S. EDs. aHTN is defined as adult patients with blood pressure ≥ 160/100 mm Hg at triage and discharge without trauma or signs of end organ damage. We then stratified aHTN into a 160-179/100-109 mm Hg subgroup and > 180/110 mm Hg subgroup and examined diagnosis and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 5.9% of total visits between 2016 and 2019 met the definition for aHTN and 74% of patients were discharged home, representing an estimated 26.5 million visits. Among those discharged home, emergency physicians diagnosed 13% (95% CI 10.6-15.8%) and treated aHTN in 3.9% (95% CI 2.8-5.5%) of patients in the higher aHTN subgroup. In the lower aHTN subgroup, diagnosis and treatment decreased to 3.1% (95% CI 2.4-4.1%) and 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-2.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Millions of ED patients found to have aHTN are discharged home without diagnosis or treatment. Although management practices follow clinical policy to delay treatment of aHTN, there are missed opportunities to diagnosis aHTN.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hipertensión , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Prevalencia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Erróneo/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Asintomáticas
4.
JAMA ; 329(17): 1469-1477, 2023 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129655

RESUMEN

Importance: There has been increasing concern about the burden of mental health problems among youth, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in mental health-related emergency department (ED) visits are an important indicator of unmet outpatient mental health needs. Objective: To estimate annual trends in mental health-related ED visits among US children, adolescents, and young adults between 2011 and 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from 2011 to 2020 in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual cross-sectional national probability sample survey of EDs, was used to examine mental health-related visits for youths aged 6 to 24 years (unweighted = 49 515). Main Outcomes and Measures: Mental health-related ED visits included visits associated with psychiatric or substance use disorders and were identified by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; 2011-2015) and ICD-10-CM (2016-2020) discharge diagnosis codes or by reason-for-visit (RFV) codes. We estimated the annual proportion of mental health-related pediatric ED visits from 2011 to 2020. Subgroup analyses were performed by demographics and broad psychiatric diagnoses. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses estimated factors independently associated with mental health-related ED visits controlling for period effects. Results: From 2011 to 2020, the weighted number of pediatric mental health-related visits increased from 4.8 million (7.7% of all pediatric ED visits) to 7.5 million (13.1% of all ED visits) with an average annual percent change of 8.0% (95% CI, 6.1%-10.1%; P < .001). Significant linearly increasing trends were seen among children, adolescents, and young adults, with the greatest increase among adolescents and across sex and race and ethnicity. While all types of mental health-related visits significantly increased, suicide-related visits demonstrated the greatest increase from 0.9% to 4.2% of all pediatric ED visits (average annual percent change, 23.1% [95% CI, 19.0%-27.5%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Over the last 10 years, the proportion of pediatric ED visits for mental health reasons has approximately doubled, including a 5-fold increase in suicide-related visits. These findings underscore an urgent need to improve crisis and emergency mental health service capacity for young people, especially for children experiencing suicidal symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Mental , Suicidio , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/tendencias , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263259, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35171912

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases (NCDs)as well as a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Around 80% diabetic patients live in low- and middle-income countries. In Bangladesh, there is a scarcity of data on the quality of DM management within health facilities. This study aims to describe service availability and readiness for DM at all tiers of health facilities using the World Health Organization's (WHO) Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) standard tool. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 266 health facilities all across Bangladesh using the WHO SARA standard tool. Descriptive analyses for the availability of DM services was carried out. Composite scores for facility readiness index (RI) were calculated in four domains: staff and guideline, basic equipment, diagnostic capacity, and essential medicines. Indices were stratified by facility level and a cut off value of 70% was considered as 'ready' to manage diabetes at each facility level. RESULTS: The mean RI score of tertiary and specialized hospitals was above the cutoff value of 70% (RI: 79%), whereas for District Hospitals (DHs), Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) and NGO and Private hospitals the RI scores were other levels of 65%, 51% and 62% respectively. This indicating that only the tertiary level of health facilities was ready to manage DM. However, it has been observed that the RI scores of the essential medicine domain was low at all levels of health facilities including tertiary-level. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed only tertiary level facilities were ready to manage DM. However, like other facilities, they require an adequate supply of essential medicines. Alongside the inadequate supply of medicines, shortage of trained staff and unavailability of guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of DM also contributed to the low RI score for rest of the facilities.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos
6.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 2, 2022 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-Intubated Thoracic Surgery (NITS) is becoming increasingly adopted all over the world. Although it is mainly used for pleural operations,, non-intubated parenchymal lung surgery has been less frequently reported. Recently, NITS utilization seems to be increased also in Italy, albeit there are no multi-center studies confirming this finding. The objective of this survey is to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the performance of NITS in Italy. METHODS: In 2018 a web-based national survey on Non-Intubated management including both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists was carried out. Reference centers have been asked to answer 32 questions. Replies were collected from June 26 to November 31, 2019. RESULTS: We raised feedbacks from 95% (55/58) of Italian centers. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents perform NITS but only 38% of them used this strategy for parenchymal surgery. These procedures are more frequently carried out in patients with severe comorbidities and/or with poor lung function. Several issues as obesity, previous non-invasive ventilation and/or oxygen therapy are considered contraindications to NITS. The regional anesthesia technique most used to provide intra- and postoperative analgesia was the paravertebral block (37%). Conversion to general anesthesia is not anecdotal (31% of answerers). More than half of the centers believed that NITS may reduce postoperative intensive care unit admissions. Approximately a quarter of the centers are conducting trials on NITS and, three quarters of the respondent suppose that the number of these procedures will increase in the future. CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing interest in Italy for NITS and this survey provides a clear view of the national management framework of these procedures.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Torácica/métodos , Cirugía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia
7.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8): 1426-1430.e3, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35026367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) to evaluate current practice management strategies among AAHKS members. METHODS: An application was used by AAHKS members to answer both multiple-choice and yes or no questions. Specific questions were asked regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on practice patterns. RESULTS: There was a dramatic acceleration in same day total joint arthroplasty with 85% of AAHKS members performing same day total joint arthroplasty. More AAHKS members remain in private practice (46%) than other practice types, whereas fee for service (34%) and relative value units (26%) are the major form of compensation. At the present time, 93% of practices are experiencing staffing shortages, and these shortages are having an impact on surgical volume. CONCLUSION: This survey elucidates the current practice patterns of AAHKS members. The pandemic has had a significant impact on some aspects of practice activity. Future surveys need to monitor changes in practice patterns over time.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , COVID-19 , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Ortopedia , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ortopedia/economía , Ortopedia/organización & administración , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/economía , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/economía , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Child Neurol ; 37(2): 127-132, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986033

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess current recommendations from child neurologists and epileptologists on masking for school-age children with epilepsy. METHODS: A 7-item survey was created and sent out to members of the Child Neurology Society and Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium in August of 2021 to assess current practice and provider recommendations on masking. RESULTS: One hundred four individuals participated with representation from all regions of the United States. Masking was recommended by 95.1%, with 63.4% (n = 66) noting exception of those with severe intellectual disability, autism, and behavioral problems. Of those who write exemption letters, 54% write these <5% of the time. Only 3% reported potential adverse events associated with masking. CONCLUSION: Nearly all respondents recommended masking for school-age children with epilepsy. Potential risks of masking and adverse events were low. Improved guidance on masking is needed to ensure academic success of our patients with epilepsy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Consenso , Humanos , Neurólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Estados Unidos
9.
Lancet Glob Health ; 10(3): e380-e389, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in globe-preserving treatments, improvements in retinoblastoma outcomes are inconsistent across income levels and geographical locations. We aimed to investigate trends in global retinoblastoma survival and globe preservation during the past 40 years. We also examined associated socioeconomic and health-care factors and global survival disparity. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis by screening articles in any language in nine databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, OpenGrey, Global Burden of Disease, Global Health Data Exchange, Global Index Medicus, and International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness) published between Jan 1, 1981, and Oct 8, 2021. We screened for articles that described retinoblastoma overall survival or globe salvage, or both. All reported studies were subsequently stratified into four periods: 1980-89, 1990-99, 2000-09, and 2010-20. Indicators on socioeconomic and health-care factors were extracted from the World Bank and WHO. Ophthalmology-related indicators were further parsed from the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness. Between-study heterogeneities by income level were assessed by mixed-effect meta-analysis. Associations of retinoblastoma outcome with socioeconomic and health-care factors and factors for survival prediction were investigated by multivariable linear regressions. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221556. FINDINGS: Our search identified 14 621 articles, of which 314 studies were included for analysis after screening, including 38 130 patients from 80 regions globally presenting during 1980-2020. 255 articles were entered for time-trend meta-analysis, covering 29 106 patients from 73 countries. Both overall survival (from 79% [95% CI 74-84] to 88% [83-93]; p=0·017) and globe salvage rate (from 22% [14-32] to 44% [36-52]; p=0·0003) improved significantly over the four decades. Wide disparities were observed between higher-income and lower-income countries. Overall survival, globe salvage, and globe salvage for advanced intraocular disease correlated positively with income level. Higher overall survival was associated with lower Gini index (p=0·0001) and with populations that had smaller percentages living in rural areas (p=0·0005). Higher globe salvage was associated with better health-care financing and accessibility (p=0·030). Overall survival (p=0·0024) and globe salvage (p=0·022) were both associated positively with education level. Survival gaps were observed in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast and southwest Asia. INTERPRETATION: Retinoblastoma treatment outcomes have improved globally over the past four decades but large disparities persist between higher-income and lower-income countries, with some areas having major survival gaps. Targeted health-care policy making with increased health-care financing and accessibility are needed in low-income and lower-middle-income countries to improve retinoblastoma outcomes worldwide. FUNDING: Health and Medical Research Fund (Hong Kong) and Children Cancer's Foundation (Hong Kong).


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Retinoblastoma/terapia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Factores Socioeconómicos
10.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): e75-e81, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649458

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Identify key demographic factors and modes of follow-up in surgical survey response. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surveys are widely used in surgery to assess patient and procedural outcomes, but response rates vary widely which compromises study quality. Currently there is no consensus as to what the average response rate is and which factors are associated with higher response rates. METHODS: The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) was systematically searched from Januray 1, 2007 until February 1, 2020 using the following strategy: (((questionnaire) OR survey) AND "response rate") AND (surgery OR surgical). Original survey studies from surgical(-related) fields reporting on response rate were included. Through one-way analysis of variance we present mean response rate per survey mode over time, number of additional contacts, country of origin, and type of interviewee. RESULTS: The average response is 70% over 811 studies in patients and 53% over 1746 doctor surveys. In-person surveys yield an average 76% response rate, followed by postal (65%) and online (46% web-based vs 51% email) surveys. Patients respond significantly more often than doctors to surveys by mail (P < 0.001), email (P = 0.003), web-based surveys (P < 0.001) and mixed mode surveys (P = 0.006). Additional contacts significantly improve response rate in email (P = 0.26) and web-based (P = 0.041) surveys in doctors. A wide variation in response rates was identified between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Every survey is unique, but the main commonality between studies is response rate. Response rates appear to be highly dependent on type of survey, follow-up, geography, and interviewee type.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/ética , Humanos
11.
Acta Radiol ; 63(3): 351-359, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33648351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Administration of contrast medium (CM) is an important image quality factor in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. There is no clear evidence or guidelines on CM strategies for chest CT, thus a consensus approach is needed. PURPOSE: To survey the potential impact on differences in chest CT protocols, with emphasis on strategies for the administration of CM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 170 respondents were included in this survey, which used two different approaches: (i) an online survey was sent to the members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI); and (ii) an email requesting a copy of their CT protocol was sent to all hospitals in Norway, and university hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. The survey focused on factors affecting CM protocols and enhancement in chest CT. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 24% (n = 170): 76% of the respondents used a CM concentration of ≥350 mgI/mL; 52% of the respondents used a fixed CM volume strategy. Fixed strategies for injection rate and delay were also the most common approach, practiced by 73% and 57% of the respondents, respectively. The fixed delay was in the range of 20-90 s. Of the respondents, 56% used flexible tube potential strategies (kV). CONCLUSION: The chest CT protocols and CM administration strategies employed by the respondents vary widely, affecting the image quality. The results of this study underline the need for further research and consensus guidelines related to chest CT.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Radiografía Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Dinamarca , Europa (Continente) , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Noruega , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Suecia , Factores de Tiempo
12.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(2): 148-156, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416358

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in the rate of cesarean delivery between Canadian-born women and immigrants to Canada and by duration of time in Canada and rate of cesarean delivery in their country-of-origin. METHODS: We used linked data from hospitalization records and the Canadian Community Health Survey for all deliveries after 20 weeks gestation between 2002 and 2017 in Canada (excluding Québec). Odds of cesarean delivery in recent immigrants (<5 y in Canada) and non-recent immigrants (≥5 y in Canada) were compared with those of Canadian-born women using multivariable logistic regression. Immigrants were further categorized using the cesarean delivery rate in their country-of-origin as low (<10%), medium (≥10 to <35%), or high (≥35%). RESULTS: Of the 53 505 women included, 89% were Canadian-born, 4% were recent immigrants and 7% were non-recent immigrants. Overall, 28.6% of women had a cesarean delivery. After adjusting for medical and socio-economic factors, the odds of cesarean delivery among recent immigrants (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.95-1.34) and non-recent immigrants (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.98-1.25) did not differ statistically from those of Canadian-born women. Recent immigrants from countries with lower cesarean delivery rates had higher odds of cesarean delivery (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05-1.70), whereas the odds of cesarean for recent immigrants from medium- and high-rate countries did not differ from those of Canadian-born women. CONCLUSION: After accounting for demographic and medical factors, few differences remained in cesarean delivery rates between immigrants and Canadian-born women. Country-of-origin practices are unlikely to reflect preferences for cesarean delivery in immigrant women in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Canadá/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 307, 2021 12 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872523

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a multidimensional condition characterized by loss of functional reserve, which results in increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes following surgery. Anesthesiologists can reduce adverse outcomes when risk factors are recognized early and dedicated care pathways are operational. As the frail elderly population is growing, we investigated the perspective on the aging population, familiarity with the frailty syndrome and current organization of perioperative care for elderly patients among Dutch anesthesiologists. METHODS: A fifteen-item survey was distributed among anesthesiologists and residents during the annual meeting of the Dutch Society of Anesthesiology. The first section included questions on self-reported competence on identification of frailty, acquaintance with local protocols and attitude towards the increasing amounts of elderly patients presenting for surgery. The second part included questions on demographic features of the participant such as job position, experience and type of hospital. Answers are presented as percentages, using the total number of replies for the question per group as a denominator. RESULTS: A sample of 132 surveys was obtained. The increasing number of elderly patients was primarily perceived as challenging by 76% of respondents. Ninety-nine percent agreed that frailty should influence anesthetic management, while 85% of respondents claimed to feel competent to recognize frailty. Thirty-four percent of respondents reported the use of a dedicated pathway in the preoperative approach of frail elderly patients. However, only 30% of respondents reported to know where to find the frailty screening in the patient file and appointed that frailty is not consistently documented. Interestingly, only 43% of respondents reported adequate collaboration with geriatricians. This could include for example a standardized preoperative multidisciplinary approach or dedicated pathway for the elderly patient. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that the increasing number of frail elderly patients is perceived as important and relevant for anesthetic management. Opportunities lie in improving the organization and effectuation of perioperative care by more consistent involvement of anesthesiologists.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesiología/métodos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Países Bajos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Bull Cancer ; 108(12S): S87-S89, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756418

RESUMEN

In an attempt to harmonize clinical practices among francophone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held its eleventh annual workshop series in September 2020 in Lille. This event brought together practitioners from across Europe. Our article discusses the updates and modifications for the 2021 version of the national patient follow-up care logbook.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Registros de Salud Personal , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/normas , Aloinjertos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
15.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(12): 2991-3000, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine pharmacotherapy for obesity in the United States from 2011 to 2016 using a large, nationally representative sample. METHODS: Data were obtained during 6 years, 2011 to 2016, from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. There were 3 types of visits identified: patients with obesity and an antiobesity drug mention; patients with obesity and no antiobesity drug mention; and patients without obesity and with antiobesity drug mention. The χ2 test was used to compare characteristics across each type of visit. To predict the odds of an antiobesity medication mention for patients with obesity, a logistic regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Of the overall weighted 196,872,870 office-based physician visits made by patients with obesity from 2011 to 2016, 1% mentioned an antiobesity drug. In addition, there were 760,470 office-based physician visits by patients without obesity but with an antiobesity medication mention. An antiobesity drug mention was more likely for those aged 51 years or older and those residing in the South (adjusted odds ratio, 5.31 95% CI, 1.19 to 23.59). CONCLUSION: There was a slight increase in antiobesity medication mentions, from 0.26% in 2011 to 0.28% in 2016, but only 1% of office-based visits for patients with obesity received a prescription for an antiobesity medication. Physicians tended to prescribe antiobesity medications to those with obesity aged 51 years or older and residing in the South. Antiobesity medication for treatment of obesity is significantly underused.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
16.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 1273, 2021 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34823486

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology with great promise but uncertain clinical value. Previous research has documented variability in academic oncologists' perceptions and use of GTT, but little is known about community oncologists' perceptions of GTT and how perceptions relate to clinicians' intentions to use GTT. METHODS: Community oncology physicians (N = 58) participating in a statewide initiative aimed at improving access to large-panel GTT completed surveys assessing their confidence in using GTT, attitudes regarding the value of GTT, perceptions of barriers to GTT implementation, and future intentions to use GTTs. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to characterize these perceptions and to explore the relationships between them. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in clinicians' perceptions of GTT. Clinicians generally had moderate confidence in their ability to use GTT, but lower confidence in patients' ability to understand test results and access targeted treatment. Clinicians had positive attitudes regarding the value of GTT. Clinicians' future intentions to use GTT were associated with greater confidence in using GTT and greater perceived barriers to implementing GTT, but not with attitudes about the value of GTT. CONCLUSIONS: Community oncologists' perceptions of large-panel genomic tumor testing are variable, and their future intentions to use GTT are associated with both their confidence in and perceived barriers to its use, but not with their attitudes towards GTT. More research is needed to understand other factors that determine how oncologists perceive and use GTT in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/genética , Oncólogos/psicología , Comprensión , Femenino , Predicción , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hematología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Intención , Maine , Masculino , Análisis de Regresión , Servicios de Salud Rural , Autoimagen , Incertidumbre
17.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259601, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797824

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cases of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continue to spread around the world even one year after the declaration of a global pandemic. Those with weakened immune systems, due to immunosuppressive medications or disease, may be at higher risk of COVID-19. This includes individuals with autoimmune diseases, cancer, transplants, and dialysis patients. Assessing the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 in this population has been challenging. While administrative databases provide data with minimal selection and recall bias, clinical and behavioral data is lacking. To address this, we are collecting self-reported survey data from a randomly selected subsample with and without COVID-19, which will be linked to administrative health data, to better quantify the risk of COVID-19 infection associated with immunosuppression. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using administrative and laboratory data from British Columbia (BC), Canada, we established a population-based case-control study of all individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Each case was matched to 40 randomly selected individuals from two control groups: individuals who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., negative controls) and untested individuals from the general population (i.e., untested controls). We will contact 1000 individuals from each group to complete a survey co-designed with patient partners. A conditional logistic regression model will adjust for potential confounders and effect modifiers. We will examine the odds of COVID-19 infection according to immunosuppressive medication or disease type. To adjust for relevant confounders and effect modifiers not available in administrative data, the survey will include questions on behavioural variables that influence probability of being tested, acquiring COVID-19, and experiencing severe outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board [H20-01914]. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, open access peer-reviewed journals, COVID-19 research repositories and dissemination channels used by our patient partners.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/estadística & datos numéricos , Colombia Británica , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0259225, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714890

RESUMEN

Leishmaniasis is endemic and a mandatory reporting disease in Spain since 1982. However, between 1996 and 2014, surveillance on public health was decentralized and only some autonomous regions monitored the disease. The aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of leishmaniasis and to evaluate the extent of underreporting in Spain. A capture-recapture (CRC) study was conducted to calculate the incidence of human leishmaniasis using reports from the National Surveillance Network (RENAVE) and the Hospital Discharge Records of the National Health System (CMBD) for 2016 and 2017. During the study period, 802 cases were reported to RENAVE and there were 1,149 incident hospitalizations related to leishmaniasis. The estimated incidence rates through the CRC study were 0.79 per 100,000 inhabitants for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), 0.88 (cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL)) and 0.12 (mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL)) in 2016 and 0.86 (VL), 1.04 (CL) and 0.12 (MCL) in 2017. An underreporting of 14.7-20.2% for VL and 50.4-55.1% for CL was found. The CRC method has helped us to assess the sensitivity and representativeness of leishmaniasis surveillance in Spain, being a useful tool to assess whether the generalization of leishmaniasis surveillance throughout the Spanish territory achieves a reduction in underreporting.


Asunto(s)
Leishmaniasis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Exactitud de los Datos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Leishmaniasis/clasificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , España
19.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(11): e1553-e1560, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34626546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pathology and laboratory medicine diagnostics and diagnostic imaging are crucial to achieving universal health coverage. We analysed Service Provision Assessments (SPAs) from ten low-income and middle-income countries to benchmark diagnostic availability. METHODS: Diagnostic availabilities were determined for Bangladesh, Haiti, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, Kenya, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda, with multiple timepoints for Haiti, Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania. A smaller set of diagnostics were included in the analysis for primary care facilities compared with those expected at hospitals, with 16 evaluated in total. Surveys spanned 2004-18, including 8512 surveyed facilities. Country-specific facility types were mapped to basic primary care, advanced primary care, or hospital tiers. We calculated percentages of facilities offering each diagnostic, accounting for facility weights, stratifying by tier, and for some analyses, region. The tier-level estimate of diagnostic availability was defined as the median of all diagnostic-specific availabilities at each tier, and country-level estimates were the median of all diagnostic-specific availabilities of each of the tiers. Associations of country-level diagnostic availability with country income as well as (within-country) region-level availability with region-specific population densities were determined by multivariable linear regression, controlling for appropriate covariates including tier. FINDINGS: Median availability of diagnostics was 19·1% in basic primary care facilities, 49·2% in advanced primary care facilities, and 68·4% in hospitals. Availability varied considerably between diagnostics, ranging from 1·2% (ultrasound) to 76·7% (malaria) in primary care (basic and advanced) and from 6·1% (CT scan) to 91·6% (malaria) in hospitals. Availability also varied between countries, from 14·9% (Bangladesh) to 89·6% (Namibia). Availability correlated positively with log(income) at both primary care tiers but not the hospital tier, and positively with region-specific population density at the basic primary care tier only. INTERPRETATION: Major gaps in diagnostic availability exist in many low-income and middle-income countries, particularly in primary care facilities. These results can serve as a benchmark to gauge progress towards implementing guidelines such as the WHO Essential Diagnostics List and Priority Medical Devices initiatives. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Diagnóstico/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , África
20.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 14(1): 53, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occupational musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent in healthcare workers and are reported to be profession-specific. There is, however, a paucity of information around the injuries sustained from working as a podiatrist. This paper looks at the incidence of injury from working as a podiatrist, the aggravating factors to sustain these injuries and whether the changes in workload due to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the incidence. METHODS: A modified work based musculoskeletal injury questionnaire was distributed in the UK via podiatry led social media platforms. Open and Closed questions explored the demographics of the sample, perceived injury 12 months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and then 6 months into the lockdown. Pre and post COVID-19 data were analysed for differences and thematic analysis was included to categorise reported experiences. RESULTS: 148 podiatrists representing 3 % of HCPC registered practitioners responded to the questionnaire. Employment status altered as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic with a 13 % reduction in those working full time. Environments also changed with domiciliary and telehealth significantly increasing (p > 0.00) and non-clinical roles being extended (p > 0.002). Pain frequency and intensity significantly (p > 0.04) increased as a result of the pandemic with shoulder pain being most frequent before lockdown altering to the neck during the lockdown. Two main themes were identified that were attributed to the causes of pain including physical demands and working in awkward spaces. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related musculoskeletal pain in podiatrists is common with the shoulder and neck being the most frequently affected. Changes in work practices due to the restrictions enforced from the COVID-19 pandemic increased the frequency and intensity of pain mostly associated with increased domiciliary and telehealth working environments.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo , COVID-19 , Dolor de Cuello , Enfermedades Profesionales , Podiatría , Dolor de Hombro , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello/epidemiología , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/clasificación , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Podiatría/métodos , Podiatría/tendencias , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Dolor de Hombro/epidemiología , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Telemedicina/métodos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA