Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.871
Filtrar
1.
J Safety Res ; 90: 402-415, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39251296

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Active back-support exoskeletons are gaining more awareness as a solution to the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry. This study aims to understand the factors that influence the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. METHOD: A literature review was conducted to gather relevant adoption factors related to exoskeleton implementation. Building on the TOE (Technology, Organization, and Environment) framework, two rounds of the survey via the Delphi technique were administered with 13 qualified industry professionals to determine the most important adoption factors using the relative importance index. Through semi-structured interviews, the professionals expressed their perspectives on the impact of active back-support exoskeletons on the construction industry. RESULTS: Important factors included 18 facilitators and 21 barriers. The impact of the exoskeletons in the construction industry was categorized into expected benefits, barriers, solutions, adjustment to technology, implementation, and applicable tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the factors to be considered in the adoption and implementation of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry from the perspective of stakeholders. The study also elucidates the impact of active exoskeletons on construction organizations and the broader environment. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study provides useful guidance to construction companies interested in adopting active back-support exoskeletons. Our results will also help manufacturers of active back-support exoskeletons to understand the functional requirements and adjustments required for utilization in the construction industry. Lastly, the study expands the application of the TOE framework to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción , Técnica Delphi , Dispositivo Exoesqueleto , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Nutrients ; 16(18)2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39339730

RESUMEN

Background: The process of the globally aging population has been accelerating, leading to an increasing social burden. As people age, the musculoskeletal system will gradually go through a series of degenerative and loss of function and eventually develop age-related musculoskeletal diseases, like sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis. On the other hand, several studies have shown that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) possess various important physiological functions on the health of muscles, bones, and joints. Objective: This narrative review paper provides a summary of the literature about the effects and mechanisms of PUFAs on age-related musculoskeletal diseases for the prevention and management of these diseases. Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases have been searched to select the relevant literature on epidemiological, cellular, and animal experiments and clinical evidence in recent decades with keywords "polyunsaturated fatty acids", "PUFAs", "omega-3", "omega-6", "musculoskeletal diseases", "sarcopenia", "osteoporosis", "osteoarthritis", and so on. Results: PUFAs could prevent and treat age-related musculoskeletal diseases (sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis) by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation and controlling the growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and autophagy of cells. This review paper provides comprehensive evidence of PUFAs on age-related musculoskeletal diseases, which will be helpful for exploitation into functional foods and drugs for their prevention and treatment. Conclusions: PUFAs could play an important role in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos Insaturados , Osteoartritis , Osteoporosis , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Sarcopenia/prevención & control , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Envejecimiento , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos
4.
J Res Health Sci ; 24(3): e00623, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Modeling with methods based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence can help understand the complex relationships between ergonomic risk factors and employee health. The aim of this study was to use ML methods to estimate the effect of individual factors, ergonomic interventions, quality of work life (QWL), and productivity on work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in the neck area of office workers. Study Design: A quasi-randomized control trial. METHODS: To measure the impact of interventions, modeling with the ML method was performed on the data of a quasi-randomized control trial. The data included the information of 311 office workers (aged 32.04±5.34). Method neighborhood component analysis (NCA) was used to measure the effect of factors affecting WMSDs, and then support vector machines (SVMs) and decision tree algorithms were utilized to classify the decrease or increase of disorders. RESULTS: Three classified models were designed according to the follow-up times of the field study, with accuracies of 86.5%, 80.3%, and 69%, respectively. These models could estimate most influencer factors with acceptable sensitivity. The main factors included age, body mass index, interventions, QWL, some subscales, and several psychological factors. Models predicted that relative absenteeism and presenteeism were not related to the outputs. CONCLUSION: In this study, the focus was on disorders in the neck, and the obtained models revealed that individual and management interventions can be the main factors in reducing WMSDs in the neck. Modeling with ML methods can create a new understanding of the relationships between variables affecting WMSDs.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Aprendizaje Automático , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Humanos , Ergonomía/métodos , Adulto , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Cuello , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Salud Laboral , Eficiencia , Máquina de Vectores de Soporte , Lugar de Trabajo
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39200608

RESUMEN

The specific period of the start of a new working season and a return to work after the off-season seems to be a critical moment for the musculoskeletal health of seasonal workers. This study aims to identify the difficulties and working conditions encountered by seasonal workers in this particular period of the working season which may increase the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). An in-depth ergonomic work activity study, combined with a multiple case study of eight seasonal workers from a meat processing facility, was conducted. Various interviews (n = 24) and observations of work activity, organization, and production (n = 96 h) were held at different moments (off-season, return to work at the start of the season, and during the season). Critical work situations exposing workers to WMSD risks emerged and highlighted a diversity of difficulties, such as accomplishing work activity involving strong physical strain and a significant and underestimated mental load, and having to rapidly develop new skills or re-learn working strategies after a long off-period. The study findings have implications for developing actions to prevent WMSDs that target working conditions and support a return to work for returning seasonal workers and a start of work for new seasonal workers, and to address work disability in this context.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Estaciones del Año , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Adulto , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos , Ergonomía
6.
Am J Occup Ther ; 78(5)2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087879

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among surgeons are markedly increasing. Several proposed interventions to reduce WMSDs among surgeons have been studied, but few follow an occupational therapy-oriented approach addressing biomechanical, psychophysical, and psychosocial risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and assess the potential of the Comprehensive Operating Room Ergonomics (CORE) program for surgeons, a holistic evidence-based ergonomics and wellness intervention grounded in occupational therapy principles. DESIGN: Mixed-methods pilot study with the quantitative strand embedded in the qualitative strand. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six laparoscopic surgeons. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: CORE program outcomes were assessed using qualitative and quantitative data to indicate changes in posture, physical discomfort, sense of wellness, and operating room (OR) ergonomic performance. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) was used to quantify surgeons' WMSD risk level before and after intervention. RESULTS: There were 12 baseline observations (two for each participant), and two or three post-CORE implementation observations. A statistically significant difference, F(1, 6) = 8.57, p = .03, was found between pre- and post-occupational therapy intervention RULA scores. Thematic analysis of surgeon feedback, which was overwhelmingly positive, identified five themes: postural alignment, areas of commonly reported physical pain or discomfort, setup of the OR environment, surgical ergonomics training, and ergonomics in everyday life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CORE program effectively decreased ergonomic risk factors to optimize surgeons' occupational performance in the OR. This study demonstrates a potential solution to how occupational therapists can holistically support surgeons and health care providers who are at risk for WMSDs. Plain-Language Summary: By 2025, a surgeon shortage is expected, partly because of the increase in surgeons' work-related musculoskeletal disorders, which affect their health and job continuity. This pilot study shows that the Comprehensive Operating Room Ergonomics program effectively addresses these problems. The study also serves as a framework for occupational therapy professionals to work with health care providers on ergonomics, benefiting population health. Results suggest that this approach could enhance surgeons' work conditions, supporting the American Occupational Therapy Association's Vision 2025 to improve health and quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Quirófanos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Masculino , Postura , Femenino , Cirujanos , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1417250, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39171296

RESUMEN

Introduction: Surgical-related injuries are frequent, in fact the reported percentage of musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons is between 47% and 87%. These conditions are caused by long periods of standing, incorrect postures, repeated movements, little rest between operations, the lack of integrated operator rooms, the correct number and arrangement of monitors and the use of non-ergonomic instruments. This survey aims to assess the Italian overview both highlighting how prevalent surgical-related injury is in our surgeons and whether there is an operating room ergonomics education program in Italian surgical specialty schools. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was designed through SurveyMonkey© web application. This survey was composed of 3 different sections concerning the general characteristics of the participants, their surgical background and any training performed, and any injuries or ailments related to the surgical activity. The survey was carried out in the period 1th of December 2022 and the 6th of February 2023. Results: At the close of our survey, 300 responses were collected. Among the participants, the two most represented specialties were Gynecology and Obstetrics (42.3%) and General Surgery (39.7%) and surgeons were mainly employed in the Northern regions of Italy (54.8%). Analyzing the participants' background, 61.7% of the respondents had laparoscopic training during their training and only 53.1% had a pelvic trainer during their residency. In accordance with 98.7% of the respondents, during surgery we have the feeling of being in an uncomfortable position that causes discomfort or muscle pain, and regarding the frequency of these discomforts, the majority of our study population experiences these problems monthly (46.2%), while in 29.6% it is experienced weekly, 12.1% annually and finally 12.1% daily. The surgical approach that is most correlated with these disorders is laparoscopy (62.7%) while the one that causes the least discomfort is robotic surgery (1.4%). These discomforts cause 43.9% of our population to take a break or do short exercises to reduce pain during surgery, and the body areas most affected are the back (61.6%), neck (40.6%) and shoulders (37.8%). Conclusion: Despite this, our survey allows us to highlight some now-known gaps present in the surgical training program of our schools and the lack of protection toward our surgeons during their long career.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Quirófanos , Humanos , Italia , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología
8.
Appl Ergon ; 120: 104338, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968738

RESUMEN

In a previous scoping review, eight categories of interventions in individual work practice were defined. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relevance and completeness of these eight categories and to increase the clarity of the nomenclature and definitions of each category. An international expert consultation has been carried out for this purpose. Thirty-eight experts from 13 countries participated. Data collection was conducted using a survey design comprising structured questions. Consensus was reached if 75% of the experts answered 'Strongly agree' or 'Agree' on a 5-point Likert scale. For the topic 'Relevance', there was consensus for six of the eight categories (range 78%-86%), the exceptions were the categories: 'Exercising' (72%) and 'Professional manners' (64%). With regard to the topic 'Nomenclature', consensus was reached for six categories and for the topic 'Definition' this was five categories. The present definitions have been improved based on the expert recommendations. With respect to the topic 'Completeness': although a limited number of suggestions were given, this did not lead to one or more categories being added to the existing eight categories. The final 'Nomenclature' for the categories is: 'Variation', 'Professional behaviour', 'Motoric skills', 'Vocational working techniques', 'Physical workplace', 'Physical training', 'Assistive devices and tools' and 'Task content and task organisation'. This expert consultation has provided a solid basis for endorsing the categorisation of interventions in IWP and is an important step in building a framework to develop and evaluate interventions in IWP.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terminología como Asunto , Femenino , Masculino , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Ergonomía/métodos
9.
Appl Ergon ; 121: 104361, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067283

RESUMEN

This mixed-method study evaluated the efficacy of lift assist device use (Binder®, Eagle®, Maxi Air®) relative to manual lifting/care-as-usual in reducing low back muscle activity and perceived exertion during simulated patient extrication tasks. User feedback was recorded to identify factors that might influence use. Twenty paramedics performed a floor to stretcher lift, lateral transfer, and confined space extrication care-as-usual and with lift assist devices. Use of a lift assist reduced low back muscle activity during floor to stretcher and confined space tasks by 34-47%. Paramedics perceived exertion decreased from 'somewhat hard' to 'light' or 'very light' when using an assistive device. Paramedics noted that ease of use, patient comfort, task time, patient acuity, among other considerations would influence use decisions. Lift assist devices were efficacious at reducing low back muscle activity and perceived exertion during floor to stretcher and patient extrication tasks.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes , Humanos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Músculos de la Espalda/fisiología , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Dispositivos de Autoayuda , Electromiografía , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Ergonomía , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
J Nutr ; 154(9): 2628-2639, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004225

RESUMEN

The review focuses primarily on collating and analyzing the mechanistic research data that discusses the function of prebiotics to halt the frailty of musculoskeletal system. Musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) are frequently reported to co-occur within their own categories of conditions, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis owing to their overlapping pathogenesis. Consequently, the same drugs are often used to manage the complications of most types. A few recent studies have addressed the therapeutic functions of gut microbes toward those commonly shared MSD pathway targets. Improving microbial diversity and enriching their population in the gut would promote the regeneration and recovery of the musculoskeletal system. Prebiotics are usually nondigestible substrates that are selectively used or digested by the gut microbes conferring health promotion. The microbial fermentation of prebiotics generates numerous host-beneficial therapeutic molecules. This study inspects the presumptive functions of plant-derived prebiotics for the growth and restoration of intestinal microbiota and the consequent improvement of skeletal health. The review also highlights the discrete functions of prebiotics against inflammation, autoimmunity, infection, physiologic overloading mechanism, and aging-associated loss of metabolism in MSD.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Prebióticos , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Animales
11.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 79: 100439, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996722

RESUMEN

This document presents the ergonomic assessments carried out by Spanish surgeons on the materials used within an operating room. With the objective of disseminating and raising awareness of the importance of ergonomics, this working group has compiled information from a previously conducted survey on musculoskeletal disorders associated with surgical work from the year 2022, obtaining feedback from 131 surgeons from 17 distinct specialties. A noteworthy 80.2 % of surveyed surgeons reported having experienced forced postures during surgery, and 96.9 % believe that their physical discomfort is a result of the posture adopted during operations. Such postures can result in the development of pathologies and may have a direct impact on work performance and even in extreme cases, it can lead to sick leave or early retirement. By providing their insights on electronic devices, surgical furniture, and instrumentation, surgeons can help identify areas for improvement in the practice of their profession.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Quirófanos , Postura , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Postura/fisiología , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , España
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 16319, 2024 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009718

RESUMEN

One of the most vital parameters to achieve sustainability in any field is encompassing the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) of the workers. In mining industry where heavy earth moving machineries are largely employed, ergonomic hazards turn out to be significant OHS hazards causing Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) in the operators. Nevertheless, the Indian mining industry lacks a comprehensive technique of OHS risk assessment, especially for ergonomic hazards that cause MSDs. This research appraises ergonomic hazards and develops Fuzzy Musculoskeletal-disorders Index (FMI) model to evaluate ergonomic-related MSDs. Work process and work tool ergonomic risk factors were identified through literature review and directives recommended by experts. Work posture was evaluated using RULA. The data-collecting approach was implemented using participatory ergonomic and design science principles. The FMI results show average MSDs score of 3.69, indicating high to extremely high risk. Surface plots show that combined work tool and work process was the most sensitive factors to MSDs risk compared to other two combinations. A two-sample t-test validated the FMI. The findings should help safety experts and managers develop effective OHS management plans and programmes for the sustainability of Indian mining industry.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Lógica Difusa , Minería , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Salud Laboral , Humanos , Ergonomía/métodos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , India/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Adulto
13.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(882): 1360-1364, 2024 Jul 17.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39021106

RESUMEN

The use of Kinesiotaping (KT) has become common in the treatment and prevention of musculoskeletal injuries. This article covers the ten main myths encountered on a daily basis, examining the evidence from recent data (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). With current available data, there is a relative evidence regarding some effect upon short-term pain relief, improved mobility, better joint stability, drainage of edema, and improve muscle function. Concerning the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries, it seems that the effectiveness of KT is still questionable. Overall, there are few publications with a high-level of evidence that can support all myths surrounding K-taping.


L'utilisation de kinésiotaping (KT) est devenue courante dans le traitement et la prévention des blessures musculosquelettiques. Cet article reprend les dix principaux mythes rencontrés au quotidien, en examinant les preuves à partir de données récentes (revues systématiques et méta-analyses) qui nous semblent, à ce jour, les plus pertinentes. Avec les données disponibles actuellement, il existe des preuves partielles d'un soulagement de la douleur à court terme, d'une amélioration de la mobilité, de la stabilité articulaire, de l'œdème et de la fonction musculaire. Concernant la prévention des lésions musculosquelettiques, il semble que l'efficacité du KT soit encore discutable. Dans l'ensemble, il y a peu de publications avec un haut niveau de preuves à ce sujet qui permettent d'étayer l'ensemble des mythes gravitant autour du KT.


Asunto(s)
Cinta Atlética , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología
14.
Thorac Surg Clin ; 34(3): 197-205, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944446

RESUMEN

Cardiothoracic surgery, demanding in nature, often results in surgeons suffering from musculoskeletal injuries, causing chronic pain and leading to premature retirement. A significant majority report experiencing pain, exacerbated by minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite this, many surgeons delay seeking medical assistance. To mitigate these risks, preventative strategies such as strength exercises, stretching during operations, and taking brief breaks are crucial. However, the surgical community faces a shortage of institutional support and comprehensive ergonomic education. Advancements in technology, including artificial intelligence and virtual reality, could offer future solutions.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Cirujanos , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Salud Laboral
15.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 36(4): 260-265, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837696

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Surgeons are rapidly diversifying as a population, introducing new ergonomic challenges. This review describes the challenges that are experienced by special populations of surgeons including small-handed surgeons, pregnant surgeons, and trainees, and evidence-based solutions to overcome them. RECENT FINDINGS: Small-handed and female surgeons report more musculoskeletal complaints compared with their male counterparts. Pregnant surgeons frequently report development or worsening of musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome and low back pain. Trainees also report high rates of musculoskeletal complaints with minimal autonomy to alter their environment. Limited objective data exists regarding the ideal instruments currently available for special populations. Several small, randomized studies have proposed exercise regimens targeting the upper extremities and pregnancy-related pain syndromes with improvements in symptoms. Various methods of ergonomic education have been studied in trainees with improvements in operating room posture and performance. SUMMARY: Limited objective data is available to recommend specific surgical instruments for high-risk surgeon populations. Beneficial exercise regimens have been described for musculoskeletal disorders commonly plaguing surgeons but have yet to be studied explicitly in small-handed or pregnant surgeons and trainees.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Cirujanos , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Masculino , Postura
16.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4445-4456, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders has numerous physical, financial, and mental repercussions for surgeons. This study aims to establish whether the use of a wearable posture device can improve the operating time spent in suboptimal, high-risk postures. METHODS: Surgeons were recruited in Phase 1 of this prospective randomised study and baseline postural data was obtained. In Phase 2, participants were randomised to receive either a traditional educational workshop or intraoperative vibrations from the device to correct postural lapses. During minor elective day cases, intraoperative postural data was collected and stratified by forward flexion angle, into five risk categories (negligible to very high). Participants' experience with the sensor was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 100 surgical procedures (Phase 1: n = 50; Phase 2: n = 50) were performed by eight surgeons of varying seniority. Exposure to the educational intervention increased time spent in suboptimal posture (Phase 1 vs. Phase 2); 47.5% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.05. However, the vibrational intervention significantly reduced this time; 50.0% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.005. Procedure type didn't influence posture although, laparoscopic interventions spent most time in negligible-risk postures; 47.7% vs. 49.3%, compared to open procedures. Surgical consultants spent less time in suboptimal posture compared to fellow/registrars; 30.3% vs. 72.6% (Phase 1) and 33.8% vs. 65.3% (Phase 2). CONCLUSION: Vibrational intervention from the device significantly decreased the time spent in suboptimal, high-risk postures. As procedure type wasn't correlated with postural changes, surgeon-specific factors in regulating posture are paramount. Finally, surgeon experience was positively correlated with improved surgical ergonomics.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Quirófanos , Postura , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Cirujanos/educación , Niño , Vibración/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Tempo Operativo
17.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 329, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimizing muscle strain and reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders associated with intraoral scanner (IOS) usage require ergonomic awareness, device selection, and workplace adjustments in dental practice. This preliminary clinical study aimed to simulate intraoral scanning tasks using wired and wireless IOSs and assess muscle activation and fatigue for both types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen participants performed intraoral scanning tasks using wired and wireless IOSs (i700; MEDIT), with weights of 280 g and 328 g, respectively. The same computer system and software conditions were maintained for both groups (N = 14 per IOS group). Electrodes were placed on arm, neck, and shoulder muscles, and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was measured. Surface electromyography (EMG) was performed during the simulation, and EMG values were normalized using MVC. The root mean square EMG (%MVC) and muscle fatigue (%) values were calculated. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests, with the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Arm (flexor digitorum superficialis) and neck muscles (left sternocleidomastoid and left splenius capitis) showed significantly higher EMG values with wireless IOS (P < 0.05). The neck (left sternocleidomastoid and right levator scapulae) and shoulder muscles (right trapezius descendens) demonstrated significantly higher muscle fatigue with wireless IOS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The consecutive use of heavier wireless IOS may increase the risk of muscle activation and fatigue in certain muscles, which may have clinical implications for dentists in terms of ergonomics and musculoskeletal health.


Asunto(s)
Electromiografía , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Fatiga Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Ergonomía/métodos , Adulto Joven , Contracción Muscular/fisiología
18.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 381, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745218

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children spend a lot of time in school, and there are many ergonomic hazards and postural malalignments that put children at greater risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of exercise therapy on preventing and treating musculoskeletal disorders among school-aged children. METHOD: This randomised controlled trial included 212 (121 boys and 91 girls) school-aged children aged 13-15 years assigned to treatment (n = 106) and prevention (n = 106) groups, where the treatment group contained individuals with MSDs and prevention group contained individuals without MSDs. In each group, half of the individuals received exercise therapy (50 min per session, four times per week, for an 8-week), and others continued their daily lives. MSDs and physical activity were assessed by the Teen Nordic Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, respectively, at baseline and after the experimental protocol. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the frequency of MSDs in the treatment group and occurring MSDs in the prevention group (P ≤ .05). Also, there was significant improvement in all variables of walking, moderate physical activity, vigorous physical activity, and total in intervention groups spatially in students who received exercise therapy (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of exercise therapy in reducing and preventing MSDs and improving physical activity levels among school-aged children aged 13-15 years. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Ethical Committee of Shahrekord University (IR.SKU.REC.1401.022) (registration date: 31/05/2022). Clinical Trail Registration (IRCT20220705055375N1), (registration date: 29/07/2022).


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 49(16): E250-E261, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809104

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize existing studies and highlight the significance of ergonomic considerations for spine surgeons' well-being and the impact on patient outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery is a physically demanding field that poses several risks to surgeons, particularly with musculoskeletal disorders. Despite the well-documented consequences of musculoskeletal injuries endured by surgeons, surgical ergonomics in spine surgery has received limited attention. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase. Studies focusing on surgeon ergonomics in spine surgery were selected. Data extracted included study details, surgeon demographics, ergonomic factors, and outcomes. Qualitative analysis was performed due to the heterogeneous nature of study designs and criteria. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies utilized surveys to explore physical challenges, prevalence rates of pain, work practices, and ergonomic tools. Two studies employed optoelectronic motion analysis to assess the spinal angles of the surgeon during surgery. Two studies assesed ergonomics in different visualization methods using rapid entire body assessment (REBA). One study applied video analysis to scrutinize surgeons' neck postures during the case. The results demonstrated a varying prevalence and diverse presentations of musculoskeletal disorders, varying impact on surgical performance, and nuanced relationships between experience, workload, and ergonomic concerns. CONCLUSION: This systematic review summarizes the heterogeneous evaluations of ergonomics in spine surgery. Overall, upwards of three-quarters of spine surgeons have reported musculoskeletal discomfort, most commonly presented as back pain, neck pain, and hand/wrist discomfort. These symptoms are often exacerbated by the use of loupes, operating bed height, and extended periods of time in various positions. Studies demonstrate that physical discomfort is associated with the surgeons' mental and emotional well-being, leading to stress, burnout, and reduced job satisfaction, all of which impact patient care.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Columna Vertebral , Cirujanos , Humanos , Ergonomía/métodos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/cirugía , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos
20.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0297461, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776346

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Occupational musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent in ophthalmic surgeons and can impact surgeons' well-being and productivity. Heads-up displays may reduce ergonomic stress compared to conventional microscopes. This cross-sectional, non-interventional study compared ergonomic experience between heads-up display and conventional ocular microscopes. METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee and nonprofit organization MINS Institutional Review Board. An online questionnaire was distributed to a sample of ophthalmic surgeons in Japan with experience operating with heads-up display. The questionnaire captured surgeon-specific variables, the standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, and custom questions to compare heads-up display and conventional microscope and understand long-term impacts of musculoskeletal disorders. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted on responses from 67 surgeons with a mean 25 years of practice and 2.7 years using heads-up display. Many surgeons agreed or strongly agreed that heads-up display reduced the severity (40%) and frequency (40%) of pain and discomfort, improved posture (61%), and improved overall comfort (61%). Of respondents who experienced asthenopia (n = 59) or pain/discomfort during operation (n = 61), 54% reported improvement in asthenopia and 72% reported feeling less pain/discomfort since using heads-up display. Overall, 69% reported preference for heads-up display. CONCLUSION: This study provides novel data on musculoskeletal disorders and the long-term impacts of ergonomic strain reported by ophthalmologists building on existing literature demonstrating ergonomic and other advantages of heads-up display. Future studies with objective ergonomic assessment are warranted to validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Oftalmólogos , Humanos , Ergonomía/métodos , Japón , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Microscopía/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Astenopía/prevención & control , Astenopía/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Postura , Pueblos del Este de Asia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...