Evaluation of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal mass in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for adnexal mass does occur in pregnant women and therefore the choice of surgery during pregnancy needs to be carefully considered and studied. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of Laparo-endoscopic Single-site Surgery (LESS) for adnexal mass during pregnancy and investigate the perioperative condition, pregnancy complications, and obstetric outcomes of operative women during pregnancy. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected medical records and surgery videos of 20 pregnant women who underwent LESS for adnexal mass between November 2019 and January 2022. Baseline characteristics, operative-related variables, and pregnancy outcomes were followed up. RESULTS: LESS for adnexal mass was successfully performed in 20 pregnant women, with very satisfactory surgery outcomes reported in all cases. The average gestational age at operation was 15+2 weeks (range, 5+1- 25+4 weeks). The median operative time was 80.8 min (range, 40 -185 min) and the average operative bleeding was 28.0 ml (range, 10-50 ml). The average VAS of 24 h postoperatively was 1 (range, 0-2), and the average length of hospital stay was 5.15 days (range, 3-7 days). All these women delivered a healthy newborn at full term except 1 woman induced abortion for her own reasons at 16+5 weeks gestational age (GA). The average GA of delivery was 39+1 weeks (range, 37-40+1 weeks), the average birth weight was 3228.95 g (range, 2740-3930 g), and the average Apgar score at 5 min was 9.95 (range, 9-10). CONCLUSIONS: LESS for adnexal mass is safe and feasible for pregnant women.

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US Score Effect on Surgical Resection Rate.

Background The Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk score can be used to accurately stratify ovarian lesions based on morphologic characteristics. However, there are no large multicenter studies assessing the potential impact of using O-RADS US version 2022 risk score in patients referred for surgery for an ovarian or adnexal lesion. Purpose To retrospectively determine the proportion of patients with ovarian or adnexal lesions without acute symptoms who may have been managed conservatively by using the O-RADS US version 2022 risk score. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study included patients with ovarian cystic lesions and nonacute symptoms who underwent surgical resection after US before the introduction of O-RADS US between January 2011 and December 2014. Investigators blinded to the final diagnoses recorded lesion imaging features and O-RADS US risk scores. The frequency of malignancy and the diagnostic performance of the risk score were calculated. The Mann-Whitney test and Fisher exact test were performed, with P < .05 indicating a statistically significant difference. Results A total of 377 patients with surgically resected lesions were included. Among the resected lesions, 42% (157 of 377) were assigned an O-RADS US risk score of 2. Of the O-RADS US 2 lesions, 54% (86 of 157) were nonneoplastic, 45% (70 of 157) were dermoids or other benign tumors, and less than 1% (one of 157) were malignant. Using O-RADS US 4 as the optimal threshold for malignancy prediction yielded a 94% (68 of 72) sensitivity, 64% (195 of 305) specificity, 38% (68 of 178) positive predictive value, and 98% (195 of 199) negative predictive value. Conclusion In patients without acute symptoms who underwent surgery for ovarian and adnexal lesions before the O-RADS US risk score was published, nearly half (42%) of surgically resected lesions retrospectively met the O-RADS US 2 version 2022 criteria. In these patients, imaging follow-up or conservative management could have been offered. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fournier in this issue.

Integrating Contrast-enhanced US to O-RADS US for Classification of Adnexal Lesions with Solid Components: Time-intensity Curve Analysis versus Visual Assessment.

Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis and subjective visual assessment of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) when integrated with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk stratification system for characterizing adnexal lesions with solid components. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter study conducted from September 2021 to December 2022, female individuals with suspected adnexal lesions containing solid components detected at routine US were enrolled. All participants underwent preoperative CEUS examinations. Histopathologic findings were used as the reference standard for diagnosis. Lesions were classified according to the O-RADS US system. Enhancement of solid tissue compared with the outer myometrium was evaluated using both TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment. The diagnostic performance of O-RADS alone and each CEUS assessment method when integrated with the O-RADS US system was assessed and compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results A total of 180 lesions (80 malignant and 100 benign histopathologic outcomes) in 175 participants (median age, 47 years [IQR, 33-56]) were analyzed. Incorporating CEUS (assessed through both TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment) with O-RADS US showed significantly improved diagnostic performance over O-RADS US alone, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.91) compared with 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.84). No evidence of a difference was observed between the AUCs of TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment in the enhancement evaluation of solid tissue with CEUS for adnexal malignancy categorization (P = .83). Conclusion Subjective visual assessment and TIC analysis of CEUS features when integrated with the O-RADS US scoring system showed comparable diagnostic performance in assigning adnexal malignancy risk. Keywords: Adnexal Lesions, Contrast-enhanced US, O-RADS, Time-intensity Curve Analysis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Laparotomy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of adnexal torsion during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Adnexal torsion (AT) is a rare emergency complication during pregnancy. Increasing evidence implies that operative laparoscopy for adnexal torsion performed during pregnancy could be safe and feasible. We procured and evaluated the surgical and obstetric outcomes between laparoscopy and laparotomy to determine the optimal approach for treating AT during pregnancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving telephone questionnaire on adnexal torsion during pregnancy that occurred between July 2012 and July 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The study cohort included 155 pregnant women who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery. The clinical characteristics, surgical interventions, postoperative pathology and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were treated by laparoscopy, and 53 patients were treated by laparotomy. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopy group had significantly less blood loss (17.5 ml vs. 20.0 ml, p = .004), a lower incidence of delayed incision healing (1.0% vs. 11.3%, p = .011), and a shorter hospital stay (5.0 days vs. 8.0 days, p < .001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of obstetric outcomes, including preterm delivery, miscarriage rate, birth weight, delivery gestation, cesarean delivery rate, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. All the pathological findings were benign except for one case of borderline mucinous cystadenoma. The most common pathological types were luteal cysts in the laparoscopy group and mature teratomas in the laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy yielded successful outcomes, with less surgical bleeding, less delayed wound healing, and shorter hospital stays. Laparoscopy could be a promising approach for diagnosing and treating AT during pregnancy.

Using ultrasound to identify adnexal masses.

ABSTRACT: This article describes the use of ultrasound in the initial diagnosis of a patient with a pelvic mass. CT commonly is used to detect ovarian cancer, especially when the patient has nonspecific symptoms; ultrasound also can be used as a follow-up procedure after an abdominal ultrasound reveals suspicious findings.

Too big to bag? - Technique for bagging very large adnexal masses via vNOTES.

The technique to perform adnexectomy for adnexal masses has shifted over the last decades, from open surgery towards minimally invasive approaches. At the same time caution is warranted to prevent perioperative intra-abdominal spilling of cyst content which can be a challenge especially for very large masses. vNOTES (vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) combines a vaginal approach with endoscopic overview in performing gynaecological surgery without abdominal scarring. The aim of the video is to demonstrate a vNOTES technique for safely bagging very large adnexal masses.

STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific marker for STK11 adnexal tumours.

AIMS: STK11 adnexal tumour is a rare, recently described malignant neoplasm that is associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. [Correction added on 3 October 2024, after first online publication: 'ST11' in preceding sentence has been corrected to 'STK11' in this version.] It predominantly originates from the para-adnexal soft tissues and often shows secondary involvement of the fallopian tube and ovary. STK11 adnexal tumours have a broad differential diagnosis due to their variable morphology and non-specific immunoprofile, and diagnostic confirmation currently requires sequencing to identify an STK11 mutation. We investigate the diagnostic utility of STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a cohort of STK11 adnexal tumours and morphological mimics. METHODS AND RESULTS: IHC for STK11 was performed on 122 tumours, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics (10 female adnexal tumours of Wolffian origin, 22 adult granulosa cell tumours, 10 juvenile granulosa cell tumours, four Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours, two Leydig cell tumours, one Sertoli cell tumour, one steroid cell tumour, four extra-ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours, 16 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, eight tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas, five ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas, 14 ovarian carcinosarcomas, five peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas, two pelvic plexiform leiomyomata and one ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumour). All STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic staining for STK11. All other tumour types showed retained cytoplasmic staining, except for one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation which showed complete loss of STK11 expression and a high-grade serous carcinoma with subclonal loss. CONCLUSIONS: STK11 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour from its histological mimics, and can obviate the need for confirmatory molecular studies in the appropriate morphological context.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound reporting systems in evaluation of adnexal masses: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate and compare diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based reporting systems IOTA SR, ADNEX, GIRADS, ORADS for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital's Obstetrics and Gynaecology department evaluated pre-operative ultrasound imaging for adnexal masses in 80 cases, comparing various reporting systems' sensitivity and specificity against histopathology as gold standard using STATA version 17.0 for data analysis. RESULTS: Among the 80 masses, 55 % (44/80) were confirmed as benign on histopathology, while 45 % were identified as malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of SR was 100 % (95 %CI: 90.0-100) and 97.1 % (95 %CI: 84.7-99.9) respectively. Eleven masses (13.8 %) were inconclusive, reducing specificity to 75 % (95 %CI:59.7-86.8).In ADNEX optimal cut-off for risk of malignancy was 34.1 % with sensitivity of 86.1 % (95 % CI: 70.5-95.3) and specificity of 90.9 % (95 % CI: 78.3-97.5). Considering GIRADS 4-5 and risk threshold of ≥10 % (ORADS 4-5) as predictors of malignancy sensitivity was 100 % (95 %CI: 90.3-100) and specificity was 70.5 % (95 %CI: 54.8-83.2) for GIRADS and ORADS. All reporting systems were comparable (p = 0.7). ADNEX identified 72.7 % (8/11) of inconclusive cases, outperforming GIRADS/ORADS which correctly classified 27.2 % (3/11) cases. When applied to misclassified GIRADS/ORADS 4-5 category, ADNEX demonstrated superior performance by correctly classifying 76.9 % (10/13) masses, while SR achieved correct classification in only 38.5 % (5/13) masses. CONCLUSION(S): All classification systems showed comparable accuracy in malignancy risk identification on imaging. GIRADS/ORADS tended to overestimate malignancy risk. The present study recommends a two-step strategy, leveraging higher specificity of ADNEX model for improved stratification of adnexal masses.

Tubal mesosalpinx cysts combined with adnexal torsion in adolescents: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Tubal mesosalpinx cysts are paratubal cysts, that account for approximately 10% of adnexal masses, and the presence of these cysts combined with adnexal torsion is a rare acute abdominal condition, with few cases reported in the literature. We reported two cases of adolescent tubal mesosalpinx cysts combined with adnexal torsion and reviewed the literature to help improve the diagnosis of the disease. CASE REPORTS: The first patient was an 11-year-old girl with left lower abdominal pain for 5 days and fever with nausea and vomiting for 3 days, who was found to have a cystic pelvic mass on preoperative imaging and was diagnosed intraoperatively and postoperatively on pathology as having a left tubal mesosalpinx cyst combined with adnexal torsion. The second patient was a 13-year-old girl with right lower abdominal pain for 16 h and a palpable mass in the lower and middle abdomen on examination, which was hard and tender to palpate. Preoperative imaging revealed a large cystic mass in the right adnexal region, and intraoperative and postoperative pathology revealed a right tubal mesosalpinx cyst combined with adnexal torsion. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal mesosalpinx cysts combined with adnexal torsion are rare causes of acute lower abdominal pain. Early diagnosis and timely surgery are necessary to ensure ovarian and tubal function. Accurate preoperative imaging diagnosis is challenging, and MRI is a beneficial supplement to ultrasound and CT examinations, providing more objective imaging information and reducing the incidence of adverse outcomes.

Agreement between frozen section and histopathology to detect malignancy in adnexal masses according to size and morphology by ultrasound.

Objective: Management of suspect adnexal masses involves surgery to define the best treatment. Diagnostic choices include a two-stage procedure for histopathology examination (HPE) or intraoperative histological analysis - intraoperative frozen section (IFS) and formalin-fixed and paraffin-soaked tissues (FFPE). Preoperative assessment with ultrasound may also be useful to predict malignancy. We aimed at determining the accuracy of IFS to evaluate adnexal masses stratified by size and morphology having HPE as the diagnostic gold standard. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 302 patients undergoing IFS of adnexal masses at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, between January2005 and September2011 was performed. Data were collected regarding sonographic size (≤10cm or >10cm), characteristics of the lesion, and diagnosis established in IFS and HPE. Eight groups were studied: unilocular lesions; septated/cystic lesions; heterogeneous (solid/cystic) lesions; and solid lesions, divided in two main groups according to the size of lesion, ≤10cm or >10cm. Kappa agreement between IFS and HPE was calculated for each group. Results: Overall agreement between IFS and HPE was 96.1% for benign tumors, 96.1% for malignant tumors, and 73.3% for borderline tumors. Considering the combination of tumor size and morphology, 100% agreement between IFS and HPE was recorded for unilocular and septated tumors ≤10cm and for solid tumors. Conclusion: Stratification of adnexal masses according to size and morphology is a good method for preoperative assessment. We should wait for final HPE for staging decision, regardless of IFS results, in heterogeneous adnexal tumors of any size, solid tumors ≤10cm, and all non-solid tumors >10cm.

The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions.

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.

Clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign adnexal disease: a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of prospective clinical research evidence regarding the utilization of transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) as a treatment option for ovarian cysts. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of employing vNOTES for the management of ovarian cysts. METHODS: Our study included women between the ages of 18 and 70 who intended to undergo surgical intervention for benign lesions. Stratified blocked randomization was employed to allocate participants into groups. The main objective was to assess whether the assigned group adhered to the recommended surgical technique for ovarian cystectomy or adnexectomy, without any deviation to alternative surgical methods. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the study, with all surgeries in each group being conducted according to the assigned procedures. Among them, the ovarian cystectomy layer included 58 cases in the vNOTES group and 58 cases in the conventional laparoscopy (CL) groups. The adnexectomy layer included 40 cases in the vNOTES group and 40 cases in the CL group. Utilizing a sensitivity analysis, the two-sided 95% lower confidence limit was determined to be 5.5% for the disparity in proportions between the vNOTES groups and CL groups. These lower limits fell below the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings demonstrate that vNOTES was not inferior to CL in terms of adnexectomy or ovarian cystectomy. vNOTES can be considered a more minimally invasive surgical approach, as it results in reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and absence of visible incisions. Overall, vNOTES proves to be a safe, feasible, and less invasive treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study retrospectively registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2100052223(22-10-2021).

Advances in Molecular Understanding of Ocular Adnexal Disease.

The goal of this Special Issue is to provide comprehensive molecular biological data that aims to elucidate the molecular and epigenetic mechanisms operable in diseases of the ocular adnexa [...].

An unexpected case of an adnexal hydatid cyst in a pregnant woman: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cystic echinococcosis, also known as hydatid disease, is a chronic and endemic illness caused by infection with a parasite called Echinococcus granulosus. In Romania, this disease has an incidence rate of 5.6 per 100,000 individuals, which is the highest in the Dobrogea region. The liver is the most affected site, accounting for 68.8% of cases, followed by the lungs at 17.2%. While cases of hydatid disease in the genital organs are rare, occurring at an incidence rate of only 0.5%, it is worth noting that cases of this disease in pregnancy worldwide are also rare, occurring at an incidence rate of 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 30,000 pregnancies. CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old Eastern-European woman who was 12 weeks pregnant presented to the emergency room with acute pelvic pain, dysuria, and frequent urination. Her laboratory tests showed that she had a urinary tract infection, and pelvic ultrasound revealed that she had a mass on her right adnexa. Despite receiving treatment, her symptoms did not improve, and she had to undergo surgery to remove the mass, which turned out to be a hydatic cyst. She also had to undergo a cesarean section to deliver her baby owing to fetal distress during labor. CONCLUSIONS: This medical case report provides a detailed description of a pelvic hydatid cyst that was discovered during pregnancy. What makes this case particularly noteworthy is the cyst's unusual location-it was found at the level of the right broad ligament of the uterus. Despite the complexity of the situation, the patient was able to receive effective treatment and the cyst was successfully managed with great outcomes for both the patient and the newborn. We hope that this report serves as a valuable example of how medical professionals can navigate challenging cases and provide optimal care for their patients.

Unraveling the enigma: FATWO and its clinicopathologic implications.

Female Adnexal Tumour of probable Wolffian Origin (FATWO) is a rare gynaecological neoplasm of low malignant potential believed to originate from mesonephric remnants. Its rarity, non-specific presentation, histological heterogeneity and ill-defined radiological features make diagnosing them challenging.A female in her 60s presented with history of lower abdominal pain for 2 years. Her gynaecological history was unremarkable, with smooth menopausal transition. Pelvic examination revealed a firm, solid mass in the right adnexa. Imaging was suggestive of a right adnexal mass measuring 6×9×7 cm. She underwent staging laparotomy thereafter. Intraoperatively, an 8×8 cm solid, fibrous mass was noted. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry showed tumour cells with focal gyriform pattern positive for calretinin and WT-1 (Wilms Tumour -1) leading to a diagnosis of FATWO. She was kept on regular follow-up and no manifestations of recurrence were noted. Five years later, she is doing well.

Reduction in Time from Admission to Operation of Women with Suspected Adnexal Torsion During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the management of adnexal torsion (AT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of actions to limit the spread of COVID-19 on AT management. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent laparoscopy for suspected AT between March 2011 and February 2021. We compared the COVID-19 pandemic period, (15 March 2020-2 August 2021, group A) to a parallel period (2019-2020, group B), and a 9-year period preceding the pandemic (March 2011-February 2020, group C). RESULTS: We performed 97 laparoscopies in group A, 82 in group B, and 635 in group C. The proportion of women presenting following in vitro fertilization treatment was lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval ]95%CI] (0.06-0.86), P < 0.023). Time from admission to decision to operate was shorter (2.7 vs. 3.9 hours, P = 0.028) in group A than group B. Time from admission to surgery was shorter (9.1 vs. 12.5 hours, P = 0.005) and the rate of surgically confirmed AT was lower (59 [60.8%] vs. 455 [71.7%], P = 0.030, OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.39-0.95) in group A than group C. Among surgically confirmed AT cases only, mean time from admission to decision was shorter in group A than group B (2.6 vs. 4.6 hours, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: We identified differences in time from admission to clinical decision and from admission to surgery among women with suspected AT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Apparent diffusion coefficient analysis of solid tissue helps distinguish borderline from invasive malignant adnexal masses rated O-RADS MRI 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analysis of the solid tissue of adnexal masses to optimize tumor characterization and possibly refine the risk stratification of the O-RADS MRI 4 category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EURAD cohort was retrospectively analyzed to select all patients with an adnexal mass with solid tissue and feasible ADC measurements. Two radiologists independently measured the ADC values of solid tissue, excluding necrotic areas, surrounding structures, and magnetic susceptibility artifacts. Significant differences in diffusion quantitative parameters in the overall population and according to the morphological aspect of solid tissue were analyzed to identify its impact on ADC reliability. Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to determine the optimum cutoff of the ADC for distinguishing invasive from non-invasive tumors in the O-RADS MRI score 4 population. RESULTS: The final study population included 180 women with a mean age of 57 ± 15.5 (standard deviation) years; age range: 19-95 years) with 93 benign, 23 borderline, and 137 malignant masses. The median ADC values of solid tissue was greater in borderline masses (1.310 × 10-3 mm2/s (Q1, Q3: 1.152, 1.560 × 10-3 mm2/s) than in benign masses (1.035 × 10-3 mm2/s; Q1, Q3: 0.900, 1.560 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P= 0.002) and in benign tumors compared by comparison with invasive masses (0.850 × 10-3 mm2/s; Q1, Q3: 0.750, 0.990 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P < 0.001). Solid tissue corresponded to irregular septa or papillary projection in 18.6% (47/253), to a mural nodule or a mixed mass in 46.2% (117/253), and to a purely solid mass in 35.2% (89/253) of adnexal masses. In mixed masses or masses with mural nodule subgroup, invasive masses had a significantly lower ADC (0.830 × 10-3 mm2/s (Q1, Q3: 0.738, 0.960) than borderline (1.385; Q1, Q3: 1.300, 1.930) (P= 0.0012) and benign masses (P= 0.04). An ADC cutoff of 1.08 × 10-3 mm2/s yielded 71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identifying invasive lesions in the mixed or mural nodule subgroup with an AUC of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.99). CONCLUSION: ADC analysis of solid tissue of adnexal masses could help distinguish invasive masses within the O-RADS MRI 4 category, especially in mixed masses or those with mural nodule.

An explainable machine learning model to solid adnexal masses diagnosis based on clinical data and qualitative ultrasound indicators.

BACKGROUND: Accurate characterization of newly diagnosed a solid adnexal lesion is a key step in defining the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Despite guidance from the International Ovarian Tumor Analyzes Panel, the evaluation of these lesions can be challenging. Recent studies have demonstrated how machine learning techniques can be applied to clinical data to solve this diagnostic problem. However, ML models can often consider as black-boxes due to the difficulty of understanding the decision-making process used by the algorithm to obtain a specific result. AIMS: For this purpose, we propose an Explainable Artificial Intelligence model trained on clinical characteristics and qualitative ultrasound indicators to predict solid adnexal masses diagnosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: Since the diagnostic task was a three-class problem (benign tumor, invasive cancer, or ovarian metastasis), we proposed a waterfall classification model: a first model was trained and validated to discriminate benign versus malignant, a second model was trained to distinguish nonmetastatic versus metastatic malignant lesion which occurs when a patient is predicted to be malignant by the first model. Firstly, a stepwise feature selection procedure was implemented. The classification performances were validated on Leave One Out scheme. RESULTS: The accuracy of the three-class model reaches an overall accuracy of 86.36%, and the precision per-class of the benign, nonmetastatic malignant, and metastatic malignant classes were 86.96%, 87.27%, and 77.78%, respectively. DISCUSSION: SHapley Additive exPlanations were performed to visually show how the machine learning model made a specific decision. For each patient, the SHAP values expressed how each characteristic contributed to the classification result. Such information represents an added value for the clinical usability of a diagnostic system. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first work that attempts to design an explainable machine-learning tool for the histological diagnosis of solid masses of the ovary.

Female Adnexal Tumor of Probable Wolffian Origin (Wolffian Tumor): A Potential Mimic of Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Wolffian tumor and its nosologic relative, the recently defined STK11 adnexal tumor are rare neoplasms thought to arise from mesonephric remnants. These tumors typically arise in the broad ligament, fallopian tube, and ovarian hilum and although most are associated with a good prognosis, up to 50% of STK11 adnexal tumors demonstrate aggressive clinical behavior. The chief differential diagnoses include endometrioid adenocarcinoma and sex cord stromal tumors. However, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of these tumors exhibit considerable overlap with peritoneal mesothelioma. To fully characterize their immunophenotypic signature, we examined a total of 21 cases (18 Wolffian and 3 STK11 adnexal tumors) with standard markers used in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features were reviewed and additional IHC performed for cases with available material. Patient age ranged from 25 to 73 (mean: 51) years. Sites included adnexa/broad ligament (6, 28%), paratubal (5, 24%), ovary/paraovarian (5, 24%), tubal (intraluminal) (2, 9.5%), pelvis (2, 9.5%), and liver (1, 5%). The mean tumor size was 9.3 cm (range: 0.2 to 22 cm). The histomorphology in most cases (14/21, 66%) consisted of tubular to solid sheets of neoplastic cells lined by columnar to cuboidal cells containing uniform round to oval nuclei. Compressed tubules with slit-like lumens and sieve-like pattern were also seen in at least 7 (33%) cases. Three cases demonstrated interanastomosing cords and trabeculae of epithelioid cells with cribriform and microacinar patterns growing within prominent myxoid stroma as described in STK11 adnexal tumors. In the cases with available IHC for 3 mesothelial markers (calretinin, WT1, D2-40), 55.5% (5 of 9) showed reactivity with all 3 markers. In cases with at least 2 available mesothelial markers, 69% (11/16) were positive for 2 markers (mostly calretinin and WT1). Claudin-4, MOC31, and BER-EP4 were negative in most cases tested (78% [7/9], 71.4% [5/7], and 100% [6/6], respectively). Given the resemblance to mesothelioma, there was initial strong consideration and/or actual misdiagnosis of mesothelioma in 3 cases (14%). In summary, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of Wolffian tumor and its recently defined relative, STK11 adnexal tumor, can lead to misdiagnosis of mesothelioma, particularly when encountered in the disseminated or metastatic setting. Wolffian tumor and STK11 adnexal tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all pelvic and peritoneal mesotheliomas.