Detection of Esophageal Tuberculosis, a Rare Cause of Abdominal Pain, on 18F-FDG PET/CT.

The esophagus is rarely affected by Mycobacterium A 75-y-old man presented with upper abdominal pain and significant weight loss for 2 mo. Contrast-enhanced CT, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and abdominal vessel angiography gave normal results. To clarify the facts, 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed, revealing an 18F-FDG-avid lesion in the posterior wall of the lower thoracic esophagus. On endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of this lesion, puslike material was released. On microscopic examination, acid-fast bacilli were noted. The patient then began receiving standard antitubercular therapy.

[ADVANCES ON ESOPHAGEAL MEASUREMENTS: HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY, TIMED BARIUM SWALLOW, ENDOFLIP AND PH MONITORING].

INTRODUCTION: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms are very common in the general adult population. Dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation and non-cardiac chest pain are the most common signs. The clinical approach in managing these symptoms starts with upper GI endoscopy in order to exclude inflammatory, neoplastic and fibrotic disorders that involve the esophagus. Upper GI endoscopy is mandatory especially when alarm signs exist. In patients with no structural abnormalities, physiological testing might aid to better understand the origin of the symptoms and to improve management.

[Results of emergency management of esophageal lesions related to caustic ingestion in children in the emergency department of the General Reference Hospital of Niamey (Niger)]. / Résultats de la prise en charge médico-chirurgicale en urgence des lésions œsophagiennes liées aux ingestions de produits caustiques chez l'enfant dans le service des urgences de l'Hôpital général de référence de Niamey (Niger).

Introduction: Caustic ingestion in children is a public health problem; it is mainly due to domestic accidents due to improper packaging and storage of caustic products. It is a medical and surgical emergency whose management is multidisciplinary. The lesions caused by the accidental ingestion of caustics can affect the functional and vital prognosis in 10% of cases. Methodology: A retrospective, descriptive study from January 2020 to December 2022 (2 years), carried out in the emergency department of the General Reference Hospital of Niamey (Niger). The study included patients less than 15 years old admitted for ingesting a caustic product. Results: Our study included 17 patients. The average age was 5 years, with age extremes of 2 to 11 years. We noted a male predominance with a sex ratio (M/F) of 2.4. Ingestion of caustic products was accidental in all cases. The caustic product was caustic soda in 59%. The average quantity of product ingested was 5 ml (2 ml to 20 ml). The average consultation time was 3 days (3 hours to 15 days). Clinically, dysphagia was the most functional sign, represented by 13 cases, or 76%. Regarding general signs, 3 patients (18%) were admitted with fever; blood pressure was normal in 15 patients (88%); and 2 patients (18%) were admitted in a state of shock. The respiratory rate was normal in 14 patients (82%). Four patients (24%) were admitted in a state of deterioration in the general condition associated with severe malnutrition and dehydration. On physical examination, 2 patients (12%) presented with abdominal defense at the epigastric level. Examination of the ENT sphere revealed benign buccopharyngeal ulcerations in 2 patients (12%). Esogastroduodenal fibroscopy was performed in 4 patients (24%). The caustic lesions observed in the esophagus were: Zargar stage I at 25%, stage Ila at 50%, and stage Illb at 25%. In the stomach, the lesions were Zargar stage I in 75% of cases and stage III in 25% of cases. An injected thoracic-abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) was performed in 3 patients (18%). It revealed a lack of enhancement of the esophageal wall compatible with esophageal necrosis in one patient. An esophagogastroduodenal transit was performed in 8 patients (47%) admitted more than 72 hours after ingestion of the caustic. They showed esophageal stenoses longer than 3 cm in 3 patients, multiple esophageal stenoses in 2 patients, a single esophageal stenosis in 2 patients, and a single antropyloric stenosis in 1 patient. Therapeutically, all patients benefited from antiemetics to avoid vomiting and proton pump inhibitors. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis with third-generation cephalosporin was administered to 12 patients (71%). Corticosteroid therapy based on IV prednisolone at a dose of 1 g/1.73 m2 per day was used to limit or prevent stenoses in 9 patients (53%). Parenteral nutrition was administered to 7 patients (41%). Endoscopic dilations were performed in 2 patients (12%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 7 patients (41%): 3 patients underwent transitional feeding gastrostomies; in 3 others, esophagoplasties by colon transplant were performed, and 1 patient was treated by stripping of the esophagus associated with total gastrectomy. The postoperative course was marked by a leak of esocolic anastomosis in one patient for whom conservative treatment was performed with good progress. The average length of hospital stay was 5 days (1-32 days). Conclusion: Accidental caustic ingestions can have serious consequences. Preventing these accidents relies on raising public awareness of the dangers associated with improper storage of these products.

Challenges in Diagnosis of Esophageal Tuberculosis.

Esophageal tuberculosis (TB) is a rare manifestation of extrapulmonary TB, accounting for <0.2% of all TB cases. Esophageal TB most commonly presents with dysphagia, odynophagia, retrosternal pain, and systemic symptoms like decreased appetite, loss of weight, and low-grade fever as associated or other presentations. We report a similar case recently encountered as an elderly male patient presented with chronic dysphagia to solids, loss of appetite, and significant loss of weight. Radiological and endoscopy pictures looked like esophageal cancer with histopathological examination (twice) negative for the same. Diagnosis of esophageal TB was confirmed by GeneXpert Ultra of biopsy sample and histopathological examination was suggestive of granulomatous esophagitis. The patient improved on 6 months antitubercular therapy. The unique aspect of this case was how the lesion mimicked an esophageal carcinoma on imaging which posed a diagnostic challenge.

The modern face of esophageal candidiasis in an oncology center: Correlating clinical manifestations, endoscopic grade, and pathological data in 323 contemporary cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical presentation and outcomes of esophageal candidiasis (EC) in cancer patients are scarcely studied in the azole era, as is the correlation between clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological EC manifestations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of pathology-documented EC cases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We further assessed associations between presence of symptoms, standardized 4-stage endoscopic grade (Kodsi classification), histopathological data, and fluconazole treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 323 cancer patients with EC, 89% had solid tumors, most commonly esophageal cancer (29%). Thirty-three percent of EC patients were asymptomatic. The proportion of symptomatic EC patients significantly increased with endoscopic grade (P = 0.005). Among 202 patients receiving oral fluconazole, 27 (13%) had treatment failure. Underlying esophageal disease was the only independent predictor of fluconazole treatment failure (odds ratio: 3.88, P = 0.005). Endoscopic grade correlated significantly with Candida organism burden (Correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.21, P < 0.01) and neutrophilic inflammation (ρ = 0.18, P < 0.01). Candida invasion of the squamous mucosal layer was associated with treatment failure (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: EC was predominantly encountered in patients with solid tumors. One-third of EC patients were asymptomatic, challenging traditional symptom-based diagnosis. The development of integrated clinicopathological scoring systems could further guide the therapeutic management of cancer patients with EC.

Surgical treatment of Boerhaave syndrome in the past, present and future: updated results of a specialised surgical unit.

INTRODUCTION: Boerhaave syndrome is a rare clinical entity associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of the symptoms, and identification of the site and extension of the injury are key in improving the prognosis. METHODS: This study presents data on the mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome. The data were retrieved from a prospectively collected database in a single surgical unit between 2012 and 2022. The study makes a comparison with the surgical outcomes of the previous decade. RESULTS: Some 33 patients were diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome and were treated surgically between 2012 and 2022 in a specialist upper gastrointestinal surgical unit. All patients underwent standard surgical repair (in-theatre diagnostic endoscopy, T-tube placement through thoracotomy and feeding jejunostomy through laparotomy). The mean size of the defects in the oesophageal lumen was 3.3cm. Delayed presentation was noted for 13 patients (39%); 8 patients (24%) died in hospital, and 19 patients (58%) developed postoperative complications. Mortality was similar to the rate recorded for the 20 patients from the previous decade (24% vs 20%, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was 41 days, and was comparable to the 35.7 days reported between 1997 and 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Early and aggressive management of spontaneous oesophageal rupture ameliorates the postoperative recovery and prognosis. The surgical results of our unit were found comparable to the previous decade in the population of patients who were treated surgically.

A 25-Year-Old Man with a History of Substance Abuse Presenting with Pneumomediastinum Due to Methamphetamine Vapor Inhalation.

BACKGROUND There has been an increase in the use of inhalation methods to abuse drugs, including freebasing crack cocaine (alkaloid) and inhaling methamphetamine vapor. This report is of a 25-year-old man with a history of substance abuse presenting with pneumomediastinum due to methamphetamine vapor inhalation. Acute pneumomediastinum is an extremely rare complication of methamphetamine use. CASE REPORT A 25-year-old man was treated for polysubstance abuse following 9 days of methamphetamine abuse. EKG did not show any ST &T change. D-dimer was normal, at 0.4 mg/L, so we did not do further work-up for pulmonary embolism. His chest pain worsened in the Emergency Department (ED), and a physical exam demonstrated crepitation of the posterior neck, trapezius, and right scapula. A portable chest X-ray revealed subcutaneous air over the right scapular region, in addition to pneumomediastinum. The urine drug screen test was positive for methamphetamine. A chest CT was ordered, which showed a moderate-volume pneumomediastinum with soft-tissue air tracking into the lower neck and along the right chest wall. The patient underwent an esophagogram, which showed no air leak, and Boerhaave's syndrome was ruled out. His symptoms improved and he did not require any surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Considering the higher rates of illicit substance use, especially methamphetamine, it is important to pay attention to the associated pathologies and to keep spontaneous pneumomediastinum on the list of differentials for patients using methamphetamine, particularly those who inhale it, which can cause pneumomediastinum, even without Boerhaave's syndrome.

Detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal diseases: A prospective, blind clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Traditional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), an invasive examination method, can cause discomfort and pain in patients. In contrast, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE), a noninvasive method, is being applied for the detection of stomach and small intestinal diseases, but its application in treating esophageal diseases is not widespread. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of detachable string MCE (ds-MCE) for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases. METHODS: Fifty patients who had been diagnosed with esophageal diseases were prospectively recruited for this clinical study and underwent ds-MCE and conventional EGD. The primary endpoints included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for patients with esophageal diseases. The secondary endpoints consisted of visualizing the esophageal and dentate lines, as well as the subjects' tolerance of the procedure. RESULTS: Using EGD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for esophageal disease detection were 85.71%, 86.21%, 81.82%, 89.29%, and 86%, respectively. ds-MCE was more comfortable and convenient than EGD was, with 80% of patients feeling that ds-MCE examination was very comfortable or comfortable and 50% of patients believing that detachable string v examination was very convenient. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that ds-MCE has the same diagnostic effects as traditional EGD for esophageal diseases and is more comfortable and convenient than EGD, providing a novel noninvasive method for treating esophageal diseases.

Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders.

Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs.

Oesophageal fluoroscopy in adults-when and why?

Oesophageal fluoroscopy is a radiological procedure that uses dynamic recording of the swallowing process to evaluate morphology and function simultaneously, a characteristic not found in other clinical tests. It enables a comprehensive evaluation of the entire upper gastrointestinal tract, from the oropharynx to oesophagogastric bolus transport. The number of fluoroscopies of the oesophagus and the oropharynx has increased in recent decades, while the overall use of gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examinations has declined. Radiologists performing fluoroscopies need a good understanding of the appropriate clinical questions and the methodological advantages and limitations to adjust the examination to the patient's symptoms and clinical situation. This review provides an overview of the indications for oesophageal fluoroscopy and the various pathologies it can identify, ranging from motility disorders to structural abnormalities and assessment in the pre- and postoperative care. The strengths and weaknesses of this modality and its future role within different clinical scenarios in the adult population are discussed. We conclude that oesophageal fluoroscopy remains a valuable tool in diagnostic radiology for the evaluation of oesophageal disorders.

Public knowledge of button battery ingestions: A social media based cross-sectional analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Button battery (BB) ingestion injuries are a devastating and preventable event within the pediatric population. Efforts to reduce the prevalence of esophageal button battery ingestion injuries include primary preventative measures. It is integral to assess the public's baseline knowledge about BB injuries to tailor future primary prevention efforts. METHODS: This is a crowdsourcing survey-based study. Participants were notified through our institution's Twitter and Instagram accounts. RESULTS: There were 930 completed survey responses from May to June 2022. The survey found that 87% (791/910) knew that swallowing a BB could cause injury and 71% knew that it could cause death (642/905). Eight-five percent of respondents did not know what signs and symptoms to look for after BB ingestion, only 30% (99/340) of healthcare professionals felt they would know. Only 10.1% (94/930) of participants knew to give children over 12 months old honey after suspected BB ingestion. Thirty-four percent (311/930) knew that complications could still occur even after BB were removed. Seventy-seven percent (719/930) knew that a dead BB could cause injury but only 17% knew the correct way to dispose of a dead button battery (158/930). Only 8% (72/930) of participants were knew that wrapping dead BB in tape could potentially prevent injury. CONCLUSION: The current study reveals gaps in the public's understanding of BB injury including: the presentation of BB injuries; the delayed harm of BB impactions; management and mitigation strategies, and BB disposal methods. This survey provided imperative insights to help guide future education and primary prevention initiatives.

Boerhaave's Syndrome Presenting in the Setting of Third-Degree Heart Block.

Introduction: Boerhaave's syndrome, or the spontaneous transmural perforation of the esophagus, is typically thought to be due to an increase in esophageal pressure such as that which occurs during vomiting or retching. Another common etiology of esophageal perforation is esophageal instrumentation, such as during esophagogastroduodenoscopy or transesophageal echocardiography. This life-threatening condition requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent patient demise. While a history of vomiting can aid in diagnosis, this history can be difficult to elicit in an unconscious patient or may be altogether absent. Additionally, Boerhaave's syndrome can present similarly to more common upper gastrointestinal or cardiac conditions. Since mortality increases with delays in diagnosis and treatment, it is imperative that clinicians maintain a high level of suspicion for Boerhaave's syndrome and initiate treatment urgently. Case Description: This report presents a 76-year-old man who presented to the emergency department after a history of several syncopal episodes and was found to be in complete heart block. Two days later, he acutely developed abdominal distention and coffee ground emesis. As the medical team was able to gather more history from the patient and his family, it was revealed that he had associated vomiting with his episodes of syncope. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated pneumomediastinum concerning for esophageal perforation. His clinical status subsequently deteriorated. He was intubated and a temporary transvenous pacer was placed before being transferred to our facility for emergent surgery. Discussion: Complete heart block in the setting of Boerhaave's syndrome is exceptionally rare, with only 2 cases reported in the literature. The decision to place a pacemaker in the setting of esophageal perforation/sepsis is complicated and depends on the patient's bacteremia status related to noncardiac comorbidities. Clearly this case represents the need for excellent multidisciplinary decision-making processes with excellent communication between hospital staff and all caretakers. Expeditious diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation is essential to prevent leaking of gastric contents into the mediastinum and worsening of cardiac complications and sepsis. Additionally, critical timing of various surgical procedures, especially the need for a permanent pacemaker implant with bacteremia is a complicated process not well described in the surgical literature.

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for acute esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with band ligation: A large observational study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal variceal bleeding is a severe complication associated with liver cirrhosis and typically necessitates endoscopic hemostasis. The current standard treatment is endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), and Western guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis following hemostasis. However, given the improvements in prognosis for variceal bleeding due to advancements in the management of bleeding and treatments of liver cirrhosis and the global concerns regarding the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, there is a need to reassess the use of routine antibiotic prophylaxis after hemostasis. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients treated for EVL. METHODS: We conducted a 13-year observational study using the Tokushukai medical database across 46 hospitals. Patients were divided into the prophylaxis group (received antibiotics on admission or the next day) and the non-prophylaxis group (did not receive antibiotics within one day of admission). The primary outcome was composed of 6-wk mortality, 4-wk rebleeding, and 4-wk spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). The secondary outcomes were each individual result and in-hospital mortality. A logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the Child-Pugh classification to determine its influence on the primary outcome measures, while sensitivity analyses for antibiotic type and duration were also performed. RESULTS: Among 980 patients, 790 were included (prophylaxis: 232, non-prophylaxis: 558). Most patients were males under the age of 65 years with a median Child-Pugh score of 8. The composite primary outcomes occurred in 11.2% of patients in the prophylaxis group and 9.5% in the non-prophylaxis group. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between the groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.99; P = 0.74). Individual outcomes such as 6-wk mortality, 4-wk rebleeding, 4-wk onset of SBP, and in-hospital mortality were not significantly different between the groups. The primary outcome did not differ between the Child-Pugh subgroups. Similar results were observed in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: No significant benefit to antibiotic prophylaxis for esophageal variceal bleeding treated with EVL was detected in this study. Global reassessment of routine antibiotic prophylaxis is imperative.