Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunohistochemistry in Detecting MGMT Methylation Status in Patients with Glioma.

BACKGROUND: The O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene prevents mismatch in DNA replication and transcription by repairing mutagenic DNA lesions. MGMT is a predictor biomarker of chemotherapy in high-grade and low-grade gliomas based on high-risk clinical conditions. It also can be used for therapeutic decisions to predict hypermutation in recurrence in newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas. The gold standard  examination for the methylation is Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). However, this technique is not widely available in Indonesia for daily practice. Thus, an uncomplicated and simpler method such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) is needed as an alternative examination. This study aimed to predict the diagnostic accuracy of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting the methylation status of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in glioma. METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional study using formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of glioma patients, dating between October 2017 until March 2021. Diagnosis of glioma was established based on clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. MGMT methylation status was investigated using the IHC and PCR techniques. Diagnostic value of IHC was analyzed, with PCR as a gold standard method. Optimum threshold to determine positivity of IHC was determined by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and Youden index. RESULTS: Among 75 samples examined, 29 (38.7%) patients were methylated. IHC detected MGMT methylation with sensitivity of 86.2%, specificity of 63.0%, positive predictive value of 59.5%, negative predictive value of 87.9% and accuracy of 72.0%. The AUC was 0.746, indicating moderate diagnostic value. Optimum positivity threshold of the IHC examination based on Youden Index was 10%. CONCLUSION: IHC examination can be used to detect MGMT methylation status of glioma patients in limited resources setting, where PCR technique is not available.

Morphological predictors for microsatellite instability in urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Microsatellite instability occurs due to a series of mutations in the DNA pairing error repair (Mismatch repair; MMR) genes, which can affect germ cells as occurs in Lynch syndrome, whose patients are at high risk of developing multiple cancers. The loss of MMR protein is commonly determined by immunohistochemical studies. Although the relation between microsatellite instability and urothelial carcinomas has been widely studied, its evaluation is not currently performed in the analysis of urothelial carcinomas. METHODS: In this study, the microsatellite status of 139 urothelial carcinomas was analyzed and their clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. We identified that 10.3% (13 patients) of urothelial carcinomas had loss of MMR protein expression (9 MLH1; 5 MSH2; 2 PMS2; 2 PSH6; n = 139). RESULTS: Results suggest that these tumors occur more frequently in males, are more frequently located in the bladder or ureters, and present a high tumor grade with a papillary histological pattern that does not infiltrate the lamina propria or, in the case of infiltrating tumors, that grows into perivesical tissues. CONCLUSIONS: We identified patients with the aforementioned tumor characteristics as patients with a high probability of presenting loss of MMR protein expression, and consider that only these patients should undergo further immunohistochemical and molecular techniques for proper diagnosis. Therefore, we propose that the clinicopathological characteristics found in the present study could become possible markers to determine which cases should undergo additional tests.

Can evaluation of mismatch repair defect and TILs increase the number of triple-negative breast cancer patients eligible for immunotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Programmed-cell-death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatment is approved for metastatic/recurrent, PD-L1 positive, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and solid tumors with mismatch repair (MMR) defect regardless of PD-L1 status. The analytical validity of PD-L1 has been questioned and adding evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) may identify patients likely to respond to immunotherapy. We investigated the association between MMR-deficiency and PD-L1 in TNBC; aiming to identify PD-L1 negative, TNBC patients that may be candidates for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Paraffin-embedded tumor material from 44 TNBC patients was included. In 38 cases, immunohistochemical-staining´s on whole-slide sections were successful for all four MMR proteins (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2) and PD-L1 in 36 cases. MMR-status was categorized as positive (pMMR), heterogeneous (hMMR) or deficient (dMMR). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated on H&E sections. RESULTS: MMR stainings showed substantial intratumor heterogeneity. Four of 38 cases (11%) were recorded as dMMR with loss of ≥ 1 MMR-protein and 19 cases (50%) showed heterogeneous expression or partial loss (hMMR) of ≥ 1 MMR-protein. Three of 22 PD-L1 negative cases were dMMR (14%) and ten cases hMMR (45%). 16 of 22 PD-L1 negative cases (73%) showed high TILs. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of PD-L1 negative, TNBC patients showed complete/partial loss of MMR and/or high TILs indicating that supplementing PD-L1 examination with these biomarkers may identify TNBC-patients that may be selected for immunotherapy.

Evaluation of Micro Satellite Instability and Mismatch Repair Status in Different Solid Tumors: A Multicenter Analysis in a Real World Setting.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients featuring a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system or a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) profile. However, beyond the established role in CRC patients, ICIs have highly proven efficacy in other solid tumors featuring MSI-H/dMMR status represented by endometrial, gastric, ovarian, prostatic, and pancreatic carcinomas (EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC). Our aim was to compare the concordance rates among the Idylla™ MSI test, TapeStation 4200, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in assessing MSI-H/dMMR status in EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC patients. The Sanger sequencing-based Titano MSI test was used in discordant cases. One hundred and eighty-five cases (n = 40 PrC, n = 39 GC, n = 38 OC, n = 35 PaC, and n = 33 EC) were retrospectively selected. MMR protein expression was evaluated by IHC. After DNA quality and quantity evaluations, the IdyllaTM and TapeStation 4200 platforms were adopted for the evaluation of MSI status. Remarkably, compared to IHC, the Idylla™ platform achieved a global concordance rate of 94.5% (154/163) for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) cases and 77.3% (17/22) for the MSI-H/dMMR cases. Similarly, a global concordance rate of 91.4% (149/163) and 68.2% (15/22) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was also identified between IHC and the TapeStation 4200 microfluidic system. In addition, a global concordance of 93.1% (148/159) and 69.2% (18/26) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was observed between the Idylla™ and TapeStation 4200 platforms. Discordant cases were analyzed using the Titano MSI kit. Overall, our data pinpointed a central role for molecular techniques in the diagnostic evaluation of dMMR/MSI-H status not only in CRC patients but also in other types of solid tumors.

DNA mismatch repair-deficient non-neoplastic endometrial glands are common in Lynch syndrome patients and are present at a higher density than in the colon.

AIMS: The hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS) is DNA mismatch repair protein (MMR) deficiency. Recently, MMR deficiency in non-neoplastic colonic crypts has been identified as a novel indicator of LS. We aimed to determine whether MMR-deficient non-neoplastic endometrial glands can distinguish patients with and without LS, and to compare the level of MMR deficiency in the normal endometrium and colon in LS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of MMR proteins in the normal endometrial mucosa from 64 patients, including 34 patients with confirmed LS (17 with endometrial cancer and 17 without cancer), 30 patients with endometrial cancer without LS (10 with tumours with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and 20 with MMR-proficient tumours), and in the normal colonic mucosa from 30 LS patients. MMR-deficient non-neoplastic endometrial glands were identified in 47% of LS patients and in no patients without LS (P < 0.001). MMR-deficient non-neoplastic glands were more often identified in LS patients with endometrial cancer (65%) than in those without endometrial cancer (29%) (P = 0.04). In contrast to what was seen in the normal colon, MMR-deficient glands in the normal endometrium were seen as large, contiguous groups, ranging in number from two to 101 (87% versus 45%, P = 0.02). MMR-deficient glands were identified at a higher density in the endometrium than in the colon in LS patients (median number of MMR-deficient glands, 22 versus two, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that MMR-deficient non-neoplastic endometrial glands constitute an indicator of LS, and that MMR-deficient glands in the endometrium are present in a pattern of contiguous large groups.

Compliance with mismatch repair testing in pT1 colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 70 years.

Mismatch repair (MMR) testing is recommended in the Netherlands for all patients under 70 years of age with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to identify Lynch syndrome. T1 CRC can be removed by local excision or oncological surgical resection. We evaluated the frequency of MMR testing in pT1 lesions within the Dutch CRC screening cohort. pT1 CRC diagnosed within the Dutch population-based screening program from 2016-2018 were identified by the Dutch pathology registry (PALGA). Pathology reports were evaluated, including registration of MMR testing (by immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability PCR). Frequency of MMR testing was compared between pT1 tumors that were treated by local (endoscopic or transanal) excision and oncological surgical resections. A total of 3.692 pT1 CRCs were diagnosed (median age 63 years, 61.4% males). MMR testing was performed in 83% and uptake increased over time (71% in 2016 to 92% in 2018, p<0.01). MMR testing was significantly more often performed in younger patients and in academic hospitals. When pT1 CRC was treated by oncological surgical resection (n=1.132), MMR testing was performed in 89% of cases and was known prior to oncological resection in 51% of cases. MMR testing occurred significantly less often in case of local excision (80% of n=2.560) compared to oncological surgical resection (p<0.01). MMR testing was performed in 83% of T1 CRCs and uptake increased over time. MMR testing was more frequently performed in pT1 CRC resected by oncological surgical resection compared with local excision.

Detection of microsatellite instability with Idylla MSI assay in colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Universal testing of microsatellite instability (MSI) is recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) to screen for Lynch syndrome and to aid in assessing prognosis and optimal treatment. We compared the performance of Idylla MSI test to immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in consecutive series of 100 CRC and 108 EC samples, as well as in retrospective series of 28 CRC and 33 EC specimens with known deficient MMR protein expression. The concordance between the Idylla test and IHC was 100% in all CRC samples (n=128) but lower in EC samples (87.2%; n=141). In the EC samples, sensitivity of Idylla test was 72.7% and specificity 100%. EC MSI/dMMR agreement was 85.4% for MLH1, 87.5% for MSH2, and only 35.3% for MSH6. When we analyzed 14 EC samples that were discrepant, i.e., dMMR using IHC and microsatellite stable using Idylla, with microsatellite markers BAT25 and BAT26, we found four cases to be replication error (RER) positive. All RER positive cases were deficient for MSH6 protein expression. We also re-analyzed EC samples with variable tumor cellularity to determine the limit of detection of the Idylla test and found that a 30% or higher tumor cellularity is required. We conclude that Idylla MSI test offers a sensitive and specific method for CRC diagnostics but is less sensitive in EC samples especially in the case of MSH6 deficiency.

DNA mismatch repair deficiency and p53 abnormality are age-related events in mixed endometrial carcinoma with a clear cell component.

Mixed endometrial carcinoma (MEC) is defined as a tumor composed of two or more spatially distinct subtypes, at least one of which is serous or clear cell carcinoma. In this study, the clinicopathological features of 15 MEC cases containing a clear cell component (MEC-C) were investigated. The ages of patients ranged from 32 to 83 years (median, 61 years). The combinations of carcinoma components observed were endometrioid and clear cell in ten patients; endometrioid, clear cell and serous in three; and clear cell and serous in two. Immunohistochemically, nine had DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency (MMR-d), nine had loss of ARID1A and three cases had aberrant p53 expression. MMR-d and loss of ARID1A showed a strong correlation. Only one case showed both MMR-d and aberrant p53 expression. The patients with MMR-d were younger than those without MMR-d (median; 58 years vs. 71 years). Loss of ARID1A also showed significant predilection for younger women than ARID1A intact cases. In conclusion, MMR-d was observed in 60 % of MEC-C, showed predilection for young women, and was associated with ARID1A loss. In contrast, non- MMR-d MEC-C occurred in elder women and some tumors may associate with TP53 mutation. These findings suggest that MEC-C develop via two different molecular mechanisms and they are age-related events.

Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer.

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an indicator of good prognosis in localized colon cancer but also associated with lack of expression of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) and high tumor grade; markers that in isolation indicate a poor prognosis. Our study aims to identify clinically relevant prognostic subgroups by combining information about tumor grade, MMR phenotype, and CDX2 expression. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and CDX2 was performed in 544 patients with colon cancer stage II-III, including a cohort from a randomized trial. In patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) and CDX2 negativity, hazard ratio (HR) for cancer death was 2.93 (95% CI 1.23-6.99, p = 0.015). Cancer-specific survival for pMMR/CDX2-negative cases was 35.8 months (95% CI 23.4-48.3) versus 52.1-53.5 months (95% CI 45.6-58.6, p = 0.001) for the remaining cases (CDX2-positive tumors or deficient MMR (dMMR)/CDX2-negative tumors). In our randomized cohort, high tumor grade was predictive of response to adjuvant fluorouracil-levamisole in pMMR patients, with a significant interaction between tumor grade and treatment (p = 0.036). For pMMR patients, high tumor grade was a significant marker of poor prognosis in the surgery-only group (HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.68-12.61), p = 0.003) but not in the group receiving chemotherapy (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.15-3.00), p = 0.587). To conclude, patients with pMMR and CDX2 negativity have a very poor prognosis. Patients with pMMR and high-graded tumors have a poor prognosis but respond well to adjuvant chemotherapy. CDX2 expression and tumor grade did not impact prognosis in patients with dMMR.

The impact of pre-analytical parameters on class II biomarkers by immunohistochemistry: concordance across four tissue processing protocols.

In the modern era of precision medicine, a number of class II immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers are routinely tested in pathologic laboratories to select cancer patients who may be candidates for hormonal, targeted, and immune therapies. Pre-analytical factors, including tissue processing, are critical components of biomarker testing and require validation to ensure reliable results. In this study, we aimed to study the impact of tissue processing on biomarkers (including ER, PR, HER2, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, BRAF V600E, and PD-L1) in a large prospective cohort of 109 tumors. We found that ER and MMR were not impacted; PR, HER2, and BRAF V600E were minimally affected; and PD-L1 regardless of the antibody clone was strongly influenced by a combination of tissue processing procedures and intratumoral heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that validation of pre-analytical parameters, such as tissue processing, is important for certain class II biomarkers, in particular PD-L1 IHC.

Clinicopathological features of mismatch repair protein expression patterns in colorectal cancer.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is reflective of a deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) system, which is mostly associated with the methylation of mismatch repair (MMR) genes and BRAF mutations in sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs). We performed a retrospective study to analyze the clinicopathological features of dMMR CRCs and their association with the BRAF V600E mutation. The incidence of dMMR CRCs in our cohort was 7.4 % (118/1603). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed four common dMMR IHC patterns in 116 dMMR CRCs from 110 patients. dMMR type 1 (MLH1-/PMS2-) CRCs were the most frequent pattern, usually showing typical proximal location and MSI histology. The BRAF V600E mutation was almost exclusively observed in dMMR type 1 (32 of 72) and dMMR type 2 (PMS- only, 7 of 18) CRCs (p = 0.001). Patients with dMMR type 3 (MSH2-/MSH6-) CRCs were usually diagnosed at younger ages (p < 0.001) and had the strongest family history of Lynch syndrome-associated tumors (p = 0.002). dMMR type 3 CRCs frequently presented at advanced stages (p = 0.005) with perineural invasion (p = 0.021). We also found a significant positive association of dMMR type 1 and type 3 with advanced stages of CRC, whereas dMMR types 2 and 4 (MSH6- only) were usually diagnosed at early stages of CRC (p < 0.001). In conclusion, BRAF V600E mutations almost exclusively occurred in dMMR type 1 and 2 CRCs. Patterns of MMR protein expression display distinct associations with tumor staging and age at diagnosis.

Usefulness of an immunohistochemical score in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with CAPTEM or everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms for which few predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers have been validated. Our previous work suggested the potential of the combined expression of N-myc downstream-regulated gen-1 (NDRG-1), O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 3 (PHLDA-3) as prognostic factors for relapse and survival. METHODS: In this new multicenter study we evaluated immunohistochemistry expression in 76 patients with advanced PanNET who were treated with capecitabine-temozolomide or everolimus. Based on the immunohistochemistry panel, an immunohistochemistry prognostic score (IPS) was developed. RESULTS: In patients treated with capecitabine and temozolomide, low IPS was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free-survival and overall-survival. Similar findings were observed with highest IPS for overall-survival in patients treated with everolimus. CONCLUSION: From our knowledge, it is the first time that a simple IPS could be useful to predict outcome for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with everolimus or capecitabine and temozolomide.

Prognostic and predictive roles of DNA mismatch repair status in colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a retrospective study.

This study aims to evaluated the prognostic and predictive roles of DNA mismatch repair status in colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. From 2005 to 2008, patients who underwent curative surgical resection for high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were recruited in this study. These patients had been received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. A total 324 patients were included (41.7% at stage II and 58.3% at stage III), and 59 patients (18.2%) exhibited mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR). The prognostic analysis revealed an increase in disease-free survival (DFS) for dMMR patients versus proficient MMR (pMMR) patients (81.4% versus 64.2%, P = 0.009), and overall survival (OS) (86.4% versus 69.1%, P = 0.004). Among the 82 patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy, the 5-year DFS was significantly higher in patients with dMMR (81.3%) than in patients with pMMR (49.7%, P = 0.040). In the multivariate models, dMMR was independently associated with improved DFS (HR = 2.171, 95% CI: 1.108 - 4.253, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 2.521, 95% CI: 1.190 - 5.339, P = 0.016). In the predictive analysis, it was observed that the benefit of treatment significantly differed according to the DNA MMR status (P = 0.020). Compared with surgery alone, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved the 5-year DFS (69.9% versus 56.2%, P = 0.024) among patients with pMMR in the multivariable analysis (HR = 0.794, 95% CI = 0.646 - 0.976, P = 0.029). In contrast, the oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the group with dMMR had no benefit in DFS (83.1% versus 81.8%, HR 1.040, 95% CI: 0.276 - 3.922, P = 0.954). Patients with dMMR colon cancer are associated with improved survival rates, compared with pMMR colon cancer. MMR status is an independent prognostic biomarker for DFS in patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy mainly benefits patients with pMMR, but may not benefit patients with tumors exhibiting dMMR.

Combination of levetiracetam and IFN-α increased temozolomide efficacy in MGMT-positive glioma.

PURPOSE: Glioma, especially glioblastoma (GBM), is the most aggressive malignant brain tumor and its standard therapy is often ineffective because of temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. Reversal of the TMZ resistance might improve the prognosis of glioma patients. We previously found that interferon-α (IFN-α) and anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) could sensitize glioma to TMZ, respectively. In this study, we further investigated the efficiency of combining of LEV and IFN-α for improving the efficacy of TMZ. METHODS: We evaluated whether LEV and IFN-α could increase TMZ efficacy using colony formation assay and cell viability assay with MGMT-positive and MGMT-negative glioma cell lines in vitro. Subcutaneous xenografts and orthotopic xenografts mice models were used in vivo to observe the tumor growth and mice survival upon treatments with TMZ, TMZ + IFN-α, TMZ + LEV, or TMZ + LEV + IFN-α. The expression levels of MGMT, markers of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic in tumor samples were analyzed by Western blotting. RESULTS: The combinational use of IFN-α, LEV, and TMZ showed the best anti-tumor activity in MGMT-positive cell lines (U138, GSC-1, U118, and T98 G). TMZ + LEV + IFN-α further obviously increased TMZ + LEV or TMZ + IFN-α efficiency in MGMT-positive cell lines, while not in negative cell lines (SKMG-4, U87, U373, and U251) in vitro, which were also observed in subcutaneous mice models (U138, GSC-1 compared to SKMG-4, U87) and orthotopic models (GSC-1) in vivo. Strikingly, the combination of LEV and IFN-α together with TMZ significantly prolonged the survival of mice with orthotopic GSC-1 glioma. Furthermore, we confirmed that the combination of LEV and IFN-α enhanced the inhibition of MGMT and the activation of apoptosis in U138 tumor on the basis of TMZ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination use of LEV and IFN-α could be an optimal method to overcome TMZ resistance through obvious MGMT inhibition in MGMT-positive glioma.

Unique clinicopathologic and genetic alteration features in early onset colorectal carcinoma compared with age-related colorectal carcinoma: a large cohort next generation sequence analysis.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer type in the United States. While the incidence of CRC is decreasing among an older population undergoing screening, the incidence of early-onset CRC is rising. There is a growing understanding that the molecular underpinnings of colorectal carcinoma vary by age. In this study, we report the genetic alterations and clinicopathologic features of a single-institution colorectal carcinoma cohort over a 2-year period using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach and microsatellite stability (MS) status determined by immunohistochemical staining. Forty cases were identified in an early-onset colorectal carcinoma cohort (eCRC) defined by age <40 years, and 164 cases were identified in an age-related colorectal carcinoma cohort (arCRC) defined by age >70 years. eCRC was more often-left-sided/rectal and more likely to present high rates of lymph node positivity with metastatic disease. NGS mutational analysis revealed distinct differences between eCRC and arCRC, with eCRC being characterized by low frequency of PIK3CA mutations, elevated frequency of KRAS and CTNNB1 mutations in microsatellite instability high tumors, and very low frequency of BRAF mutations.

Associations of non-pedunculated T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma outcome with consensus molecular subtypes, immunoscore, and microsatellite status: a multicenter case-cohort study.

Advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) or CRC with a low immunoscore is associated with shorter survival times. Non-metastatic CRC with microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. We evaluated outcome (lymph node metastases [LNM] or cancer recurrence) in these tumor subtypes in patients with surgically-removed non-pedunculated T1 CRC by performing a multicenter case-cohort study. We included all patients in 13 hospitals in the Netherlands from 2000-2014 (n = 651). We randomly selected a subgroup of patients (n = 223) and all patients with LNM or recurrence (n = 63), and median follow-up of 44 months. We centrally reviewed tumor-slides, and constructed and immunostained tissue microarrays determining MSI, CMS (MSI/CMS1, CMS2/3, or CMS4), and immunoscore (I-low/I-high). We used weighted Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the association of MSI, CMS, and immunoscore with LNM or recurrence, adjusting for conventional histologic risk factors. In the randomly selected subgroup of patients, 7.1% of tumors were MSI/CMS1, 91.0% CMS2/3, 1.8% CMS4, and 25% I-low. In the case-cohort, patients with CMS4 tumors had an increased risk for LNM or recurrence compared with patients with tumors of other CMSs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.97; 95% CI, 1.12-14.06; P = 0.03). Albeit not significant, tumors with MSI had a lower risk for LNM or recurrence than other tumor subtypes (adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.12-2.30; P = 0.39), whereas tumors with a low immunoscore had an increased risk for LNM or recurrence (adjusted HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.68-2.48; P = 0.43). In conclusion, in a case-cohort study of patients with non-pedunculated T1 CRC, MSI, and immunoscore were not significantly associated with adverse outcome after surgery. CMS4 substantially increased the risk of adverse outcome. However, CMS4 is rare in T1 CRCs, limiting its value for determining the risk in patients.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunohistochemistry for Mismatch Repair Proteins as Surrogate of Microsatellite Instability Molecular Testing in Endometrial Cancer.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) defines one of the four molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) has been proposed as a widely applicable technique to identify this group in the common practice. However, the diagnostic accuracy of such approach has never been calculated. We aimed to assess: 1) the diagnostic accuracy of MMR proteins immunohistochemistry as surrogate of MSI molecular testing in endometrial carcinoma; 2) whether a combination of only two MMR proteins may be used as a still cheaper test. A systematic review and meta-analysis of was performed by searching electronic databases from their inception to September 2019. All studies assessing endometrial carcinoma with both MMR proteins immunohistochemistry and MSI molecular testing were included. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) on SROC curves. A subgroup analysis was performed for a combination of only two MMR proteins (MLH1-MSH2 vs MSH6-PMS2). Ten studies with 3097 patients were included. Out of these, 1110 were suitable for the meta-analysis. Immunohistochemistry for all the four MMR proteins showed sensitivity = 0.96, specificity = 0.95, LR + =17.7, LR- = 0.05, DOR = 429.77, and high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.988). The combination of MLH1 and MSH2 showed sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.96, LR + =22.36, LR- = 0.15, DOR = 200.69, and high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.9838). The combination of MSH6 and PMS2 showed the same results as the complete panel of four MMR proteins. In conclusion, MMR proteins immunohistochemistry is a highly accurate surrogate of MSI molecular testing in endometrial carcinoma. A combination of MSH6 and PMS2 may allow reducing the cost without decrease in the diagnostic accuracy.

Fluorescent probe displacement assays reveal unique nucleic acid binding properties of human nudix enzymes.

Nudix proteins are members of a large family of homologous enzymes that hydrolyze nucleoside diphosphates linked to other compounds. The substrates for a subset of Nudix enzymes are all nucleotides linked to RNA, like the m7G mRNA caps and the more recently discovered NAD(H) RNA caps. However, the RNA affinity and nucleic acid specificity of Nudix proteins has not yet been explored in depth. In this study we designed new fluorescence-based assays to examine the interaction of purified recombinant E. coli NudC and human Nudt1 (aka MTH1) Nudt3, Nudt12, Nudt16, and Nudt20 (aka Dcp2). All Nudix proteins except Nudt1 and Nudt12 bound both RNA and DNA stoichiometrically with high affinity (dissociation constants in the nanomolar range) and no clear sequence specificity. In stark contrast, Nudt12 binds RNA but not similar DNA oligonucleotides. Nudt12 also bound RNAs with 5' NAD+ caps more tightly than those with NADH or m7G cap. NudC was similarly selective against m7G caps but did not differentiate between NAD+ and NADH capped RNA. Nudt3, Nudt16, and Nudt20 bound m7G capped RNA more tightly than RNA with NADH caps.

Retained mismatch repair protein expression occurs in approximately 6% of microsatellite instability-high cancers and is associated with missense mutations in mismatch repair genes.

Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair protein expression is widely used as a surrogate for microsatellite instability status-an important signature for immunotherapy and germline testing. There are no systematic analyses examining the sensitivity of immunohistochemistry for microsatellite instability-high status. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing were performed routinely as clinically validated assays. We classified germline/somatic mutation types as truncating (nonsense, frameshift, and in/del) versus missense and predicted pathogenicity of the latter. Discordant cases were compared with concordant groups: microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient for mutation comparison and microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient for immunohistochemical comparison. 32 of 443 (7%) microsatellite instability-high cases had immunohistochemistry. Four additional microsatellite instability-high research cases had discordant immunohistochemistry. Of 36 microsatellite instability-high cases with discordant immunohistochemistry, 30 were mismatch repair-proficient, while six (five MLH1 and one MSH2) retained expression of the defective mismatch repair protein and lost its partner. In microsatellite instability-high tumors with discordant immunohistochemistry, we observed an enrichment in deleterious missense mutations over truncating mutations, with 69% (25/36) of cases having pathogenic germline or somatic missense mutations, as opposed to only 19% (7/36) in a matched microsatellite instability-high group with concordant immunohistochemistry (p = 0.0007).  In microsatellite instability-high cases with discordant immunohistochemistry and MLH1 or PMS2 abnormalities, less cells showed expression (p = 0.015 and p = 0.00095, respectively) compared with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient cases. Tumor mutation burden, MSIsensor score, and truncating mismatch repair gene mutations were similar between microsatellite instability-high cases with concordant versus discordant immunohistochemical expression. Approximately 6% of microsatellite instability-high cases have retained mismatch repair protein expression and would be missed by immunohistochemistry-based testing, hindering patient access to immunotherapy. Another 1% of microsatellite instability-high cases show isolated loss of the defective gene's dimerization partner, which may lead to germline testing of the wrong gene. These cases are enriched for pathogenic mismatch repair missense mutations.

Quantitating repair protein accumulation at DNA lesions: Past, present, and future.

All organisms must protect their genome from constantly occurring DNA damage. To this end, cells have evolved complex pathways for repairing sites of DNA lesions, and multiple in vitro and in vivo techniques have been developed to study these processes. In this review, we discuss the commonly used laser microirradiation method for monitoring the accumulation of repair proteins at DNA damage sites in cells, and we outline several strategies for deriving kinetic models from such experimental data. We discuss an example of how in vitro measurements and in vivo microirradation experiments complement each other to provide insight into the mechanism of PARP1 recruitment to DNA lesions. We also discuss a strategy to combine data obtained for the recruitment of many different proteins in a move toward fully quantitating the spatiotemporal relationships between various damage responses, and we outline potential venues for future development in the field.