General characteristics, economic burden, causative drugs and medical errors associated with medical damage litigation involving severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions in China.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the general characteristics, economic burden, causative drugs and medical errors associated with litigation involving severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCADRs) in China, with the aims of improving rational medication use and reducing the extent of damage from SCADRs. METHODS: This study analysed 150 lawsuit judgements involving SCADRs from 2005 to 2019, collected from China Judgments Online. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In total, 50% of lawsuits stemmed from SCADRs occurring in general hospitals. The average time elapsed from the date of occurrence of the SCADRs to the end of litigation procedures was 1055 days. Of the patients involved, 51% were female and more than two thirds (69%) were under 60 years old. The most common outcome of SCADRs was death (39%), followed by disabilities (30%). The average responsibility of the medical provider was 48 ± 29%. The average amount of compensation was $43 424. Of the cases studied, 51% of SCADRs were Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis, which together accounted for 75% of cases with known clinical subtype. The overall average economic burden of SCADRs was $99 178, of which indirect costs made up the largest proportion (more than 60%). The most common causative drug groups were antimicrobial drugs (49%), Chinese patent medicine and Chinese herbal medicine (17%), and antipyretic analgesics (16%). Finally, 61% of medical errors were found to stem from violation of duty of care, 20% from violation of informed consent and 18% from violations related to the medical record writing and management system. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions not only severely affect patient survival and quality of life, but also impose a heavy economic burden in terms of health care and societal costs. Medical providers should be better educated on strategies to reduce risk to patients and establish mechanisms of risk sharing and management.

Clinical profile of cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study of 1883 hospitalized patients from 2007 to 2016 in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are drug-induced skin reactions with or without systemic involvement, ranging from mild maculopapular exanthema (MPE) to life-threatening severe CADRs (S-CADRs). Due to their unpredictability and severity, early recognition of suspected causative drugs is highly recommended. However, the profile of CADRs remains unknown in China. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical profile, predominant causative drugs, and cost associated with CADRs in Shanghai, China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records of inpatients admitted with a diagnosis of CADRs to the dermatology ward of Huashan Hospital from January 2007 to December 2016 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: A total of 1,883 patients (1,231 female and 652 male), admitted with a diagnosis of CADR, were investigated. S-CADRs made up 21.99% of all cases (n=414), and urticaria (27.19%) was the most frequent reaction. Of the patients, 53.43% suffered from multiple drug-induced drug eruptions and the rest (45.83%) from single drug-induced drug eruptions. Overall, antimicrobials (28.85%) was the main drug group involved, and for S-CADRs, this was antiepileptic drugs (36.15%). The total cost for CADRs was RMB23,718,788.83 ($3,588,319.04). Both age and sex were related to admission cost (p=0.005 and p=7.84E-8, respectively). Antimicrobials were the most common treatment causing CADRs. CONCLUSION: The management of CADRs requires considerable medical cost. CADRs are not only a health problem but also a significant financial burden for affected individuals.

Cost of managing severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions to first-line tuberculosis therapy in South Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of managing treatment-limiting cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs to an alternative strategy of immediate treatment initiation using second-line drugs in a South African setting. METHODS: Clinical and cost data were retrospectively collected from patients presenting with a first-line anti-tuberculosis therapy-associated CADR. Costs (2016 US$) were estimated using an ingredient's approach from a healthcare provider perspective. The per-patient and total cost of drug rechallenge, the current management strategy for severe CADR, was calculated. Alternative strategies involving second-line treatment were derived from literature and expert clinical advice. RESULTS: Drug rechallenge costs US $5831 (95% CI: 5134-6527) per patient. Hospitalisation accounted for 62% of this cost. Alternative CADR management strategies using regimens containing rifabutin, bedaquiline and/or delamanid cost 44%-55% less than drug rechallenge (US $2651-US $3276/patient). In univariate sensitivity analyses, drug rechallenge and alternative strategies were most sensitive to hospitalisation and tuberculosis drug costs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to anti-tuberculosis treatment represent a significant economic burden. An alternate strategy of outpatient-initiated second-line therapy is economically feasible but requires clinical validation to assess effectiveness.

OBJECTIF: Comparer le coût de la prise ne charge des effets indésirables cutanés (EIC) limitant le traitement aux antituberculeux de première ligne à celui d'une stratégie alternative d'initiation immédiate du traitement par des médicaments de deuxième ligne dans un contexte sud-africain. MÉTHODES: Les données cliniques et les coûts ont été collectés rétrospectivement chez des patients présentant un EIC associé au traitement antituberculeux de première ligne. Les coûts (USD, 2016) ont été estimés en utilisant une approche d'ingrédient du point de vue d'un prestataire de soins de santé. Le coût par patient et le coût total du nouveau traitement, de la stratégie actuelle de prise en charge des cas d'EIC sévère, ont été calculés. Des stratégies alternatives impliquant un traitement de deuxième ligne ont été dérivées de la littérature et de conseils cliniques d'experts. RÉSULTATS: Le coût du nouveau traitement était de 5.831 USD (IC95%: 5.134 - 6.527) par patient. L'hospitalisation représentait 62% de ce coût. Les stratégies alternatives de prise en charge des EIC utilisant des schémas thérapeutiques contenant de la rifabutine, de la bédaquiline et/ou du delamanide coûtent de 44 % à 55 % moins cher que le nouveau traitement (2.651 USD - 3.276 USD/patient). Dans les analyses de sensibilité univariées, les stratégies de re-traitement et les stratégies alternatives étaient plus sensibles aux coûts d'hospitalisation et de médicaments antituberculeux, respectivement. CONCLUSION: Les EIC des antituberculeux représentent une charge économique importante. Une stratégie alternative de traitement de deuxième ligne mise en place chez des patients ambulatoires est économiquement réalisable mais nécessite une validation clinique pour évaluer l'efficacité.

Direct costs of severe cutaneous adverse reactions in a tertiary hospital in Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are only a few reports on the direct costs of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), despite the tremendous negative impact these reactions can have on patients. We estimated the direct costs of treating SCARs. METHODS: Patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of SCARs from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010 were included. Patients who had experienced SCARs during their admission for other medical conditions were excluded. The direct costs of hospitalization and outpatient department visits were collected. Inpatient and outpatient care costs were calculated, and factors affecting inpatient care costs were analyzed. RESULTS: The total healthcare cost for the management of 73 SCAR patients (36 with DRESS, 21 with SJS, and 16 with TEN) was 752,067 US dollars (USD). Most of the costs were spent on inpatient care (703,832 USD). The median inpatient care cost per person was 3,720 (range, 1,133 to 107,490) USD for DRESS, 4,457 (range, 1,224 to 21,428) USD for SJS, and 8,061 (range, 1,127 to 52,220) USD for TEN. Longer hospitalization significantly increased the inpatient care costs of the patients with DRESS (by 428 USD [range, 395 to 461] per day). Longer hospitalization and death significantly increased the inpatient care costs of the patients with SJS/TEN (179 USD [range, 148 to 210] per day and an additional 14,425 USD [range, 9,513 to 19,337] for the deceased). CONCLUSION: The management of SCARs required considerable direct medical costs. SCARs are not only a health problem but also a significant financial burden for the affected individuals.

[Identification and economic evaluation of anesthesiologic secondary diagnoses on the basis of intraoperative medication]. / Identifikation und ökonomische Bewertung von anästhesiologischen Nebendiagnosen auf Basis von intraoperativen Medikamentengaben.

BACKGROUND: Complications and comorbidities are encodable in the German diagnosis related groups (G-DRG) system and can improve revenues. In this study, secondary diagnoses were identified through drug administrations during anaesthesia and were economically evaluated by regrouping these cases. METHODS: All intraoperative drug administrations from 2008 were extracted from a database. After exclusion of synonyms and procedure-specific drug administrations, all remaining drugs were matched to explicit secondary diagnoses. All cases were regrouped with their newly defined secondary diagnoses by G­DRG grouper software, and changes in cost weight were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 29 drugs could be assigned to 18 secondary diagnoses. From 22,440 anaesthesia the § 21 data record could be extracted in 1,929 cases and was regrouped with 2,976 secondary diagnoses, according to additional proceeds of 125,330.25 € in 2008 and 103,542.35 € in 2014. Intraoperative secondary diagnoses influence cost weight only in small parts. The average increase in revenue in this study could have been about 50 € per case. From 2008 to 2014 secondary diagnoses were continuously devaluated, although some of them, e. g. afibrinogenemia, have were revaluated. DISCUSSION: Our retrospective method of making a diagnosis and assuming a correct indication of drug administration is inapplicable to daily routine. The anaesthesiologic documentation has to make drug administration and thereby the secondary diagnosis plausible.

Costs and Resource Utilization Associated With Anemia and Rash in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents in the United States.

PURPOSE: The addition of 2 direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, telaprevir and boceprevir, to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy significantly improves sustained virologic response rates in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) but is associated with a higher risk of adverse events (AEs), including anemia and rash. Using a large administrative claims database, this study compared the health care resource utilization and costs among CHC patients who developed anemia and/or rash while receiving DAA-based therapies (telaprevir and boceprevir) versus those who did not develop anemia or rash. Adjusted costs were compared by using regression analysis. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 CHC diagnosis and a prescription for boceprevir or telaprevir were selected from a US-based claims database. The date of the first DAA fill after May 13, 2011, was defined as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous eligibility and no claims for hepatitis B treatment during the 6 months before (baseline) and 12 months after (study period) the index date. Patients were categorized into 4 cohorts based on the development of anemia only, rash only, both anemia and rash (anemia/rash), or neither anemia nor rash (NAR) while receiving DAA-based therapies. Baseline characteristics and study period health care utilization and costs were compared by using univariate statistics between cohorts that developed anemia only, rash only, or anemia/rash and the cohort that did not develop anemia or rash. Adjusted costs were compared by using multivariable regressions. FINDINGS: A total of 2862 patients were identified and categorized into 4 cohorts: 1204 anemia only, 131 rash only, 188 anemia/rash, and 1339 NAR patients. During the study period, patients developing anemia and/or rash incurred significantly more outpatient, dermatologist, and total medical visits compared with the NAR cohort. The anemia-only and anemia/rash cohorts also had significantly more inpatient, emergency department, and hematologist visits, as well as significantly higher adjusted total medical costs ($18,285 and $21,435 vs $11,253), total drug costs ($76,723 and $79,689 vs $63,001), and non-CHC drug costs ($10,391 and $10,475 vs $2437). The rash-only cohort had comparable adjusted total medical and drug costs. IMPLICATIONS: CHC patients who developed anemia while receiving DAA-based therapies incurred significantly higher resource utilization and costs compared with those who did not. The study highlights the need for new CHC treatment regimens that are associated with fewer and less severe AEs, particularly anemia.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B5801 genotyping in the treatment of gout patients with chronic renal insufficiency in Korea.

OBJECTIVE: Allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are relatively rare but cause high rates of morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that the HLA-B5801 allele and renal impairment are strongly associated with SCARs. Recent American College of Rheumatology guidelines recommend that, prior to treatment with allopurinol, the HLA-B5801 genotype of gout patients at high risk for SCARs, including Korean patients with chronic renal insufficiency, should be determined. However, whether such genotyping is cost-effective is unknown. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HLA-B5801 genotyping for the treatment of gout in patients with chronic renal insufficiency in Korea. METHODS: A decision analytical model over a time period of 12 months was employed to compare the cost and outcomes of treatment informed by HLA-B5801 genotyping with that of a conventional treatment strategy using a hypothetical cohort of gout patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Direct medical costs were obtained from real patients with SCARs from 2 tertiary hospitals. Outcomes were measured as a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: In the base model, the total expected cost and probability of continuation of gout treatment without SCARs for the conventional and HLA-B5801 screening strategies were $1,193 and 97.8% and $1,055 and 100%, respectively. The results were robust according to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our model suggests that gout treatment informed by HLA-B5801 genotyping is less costly and more effective than treatment without genotyping, and HLA-B5801 genotyping could considerably reduce the occurrence of allopurinol-induced SCARs and related deaths.

The cutaneous adverse drug reactions: risk factors, prognosis and economic impacts.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with the occurrence, subsequent prognoses and need for additional medications following cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among inpatients. METHODS AND MEASURES: This is a case-control study, nested in a large cohort study of 473,446 inpatients hospitalised from 2005 to 2008, examined cutaneous ADRs. A 1 : 5 strategy of individually matching age and principal diagnosis was applied to the data of cases (n = 700) and corresponding controls (n = 3365).The severity of ADRs was evaluated using Naranjo algorithms by senior pharmacists in the medical centre. Medical chart reviews and claim data analyses were analysed to explore risk factors associated with the occurrence and impact of cutaneous ADRs. Economic impacts in terms of length of stay and medical expenses were also analysed. RESULTS: The number of drug prescriptions and secondary diagnoses, and the department to which the patient was admitted, significantly contributed to the risk of cutaneous ADRs and subsequent prognosis. In addition to physician's seniority, the Naranjo score was also positively associated with patients' prognosis. Medical expenses associated with cutaneous ADRs patients ($US 916) were more than 2.5-fold higher than those patients who were not afflicted ($US 318). CONCLUSION: The study identified risk factors for cutaneous ADRs in terms of both patient characteristics and drug complexity. The present analyses indicate characteristics and mechanisms of cutaneous ADRs among inpatients, which provide clues for future intervention strategies and management issues in healthcare settings.

The management of skin toxicity during erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: how much does it cost?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to estimate the costs for the foreseeable management of skin toxicity (papulo-pustular reactions) in patients treated with erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in order to value the direct medical economical impact. No studies like the above have been published until now. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with erlotinib at Clinical Oncology Unit of University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy from June 2007 to May 2011. We evaluated severity and median duration of papulo-pustular reactions for each grade and we identified costs for the different therapeutic interventions. RESULTS: We evaluated 25 patients. Median time follow-up was 18.65 months (range 5.69-88.36). Finally, follow-up 7 patients (28.0%) were alive with metastases and 18 patients (72.0%) were deceased. Nineteen patients (76.0%) developed papulo-pustular reactions: 2 patients (10.5%) mild rash, 11 patients (57.9%) moderate rash and 6 patients (31.6%) severe rash; no case of hospitalization was observed. Median duration of mild rash was 97 days (costs-range: 157.7-452.2 €), median duration of moderate rash was 89 days (costs-range: 438.7-1035.6 €) and median duration of severe rash was 34 days (costs-range: 460.3-1057.2 €). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience, though the analysis of not selected case study, showed that management of skin toxicities related to erlotinib is not so expensive, especially for low grade; therefore, we also recommended to give particular attention to low grade of toxicities for reducing progression to high grade and consequent risk of hospitalization, which really impact on costs.

Economic burden of dermatologic adverse drug reactions in the treatment of colorectal, non-small cell lung, and head and neck cancers with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) may develop dermatologic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that may affect patients' quality-of-life, require medical care, and may lead to substantial costs. This study assessed the economic burden of dermatologic ADRs in colorectal cancer (CRC), head and neck cancer (HNC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 diagnosis for the study cancer initiated on EGFRIs indicated for CRC, HNC, and NSCLC were selected from a large commercial database (MarketScan Commercial Database [2000-2010]; Thomas Reuters, New York, NY). For each cancer type, patients were classified into two mutually exclusive cohorts: 'ADR' (patients with ≥1 ADR following EGFRI initiation) and 'ADR-free' (patients without any ADR). Patients were observed from the index date up to the end of continuous healthcare plan enrollment or 90 days after EGFRI discontinuation, whichever occurred first. For each cancer group, the proportion of patients and the incidence rate (IR) of experiencing ≥1 dermatologic ADR were reported. Incidence rate ratios for healthcare resource utilization and monthly incremental costs (2010 USD) were estimated using Poisson regression and generalized linear or two-part models, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of patients with ≥1 ADR ranged between 20.5-36.4% across cancer groups (IR ranged between 44.2-57.4 per 100 patient-years). After adjusting for confounders, in each cancer group, ADR patients had higher incidence of healthcare resource utilization, generally driven by higher incidence of emergency room visits and incurred incremental total monthly healthcare costs that ranged between $2284-$3210 across cancer groups. LIMITATIONS: There was no clinical measure of cancer staging and ADR severity in the database. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that patients with CRC, NSCLC, and HNC, who may benefit from EGFRI therapies, may also incur a substantial economic burden that is associated with dermatologic ADRs.

The management of skin toxicity during cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: how much does it cost? A retrospecive economic assessment from a single-center experience.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Skin rash is a predictable and manageable side effect of anti-EGFR therapy such as cetuximab. The aim of this study is to estimate the costs for the foreseeable management of skin toxicity in patients treated with cetuximab in our institute in order to assess the direct medical economic impact. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab at our institute from June 2006 to May 2011. We evaluated the severity and mean duration of skin rash for each grade and we identified the costs for the different therapeutic interventions. Patients were treated according to the general consensus management of skin toxicity associated with cetuximab treatment. RESULTS: We evaluated 31 patients. The median follow-up was 28.95 months (range, 1.84-75.49). At last follow-up 10 patients (32.3%) were alive with metastases, 18 patients (58.1%) had died, 1 patient (3.2%) was alive without evidence of disease, and 2 patients (6.5%) were lost to follow-up. The median progression-free survival was 8.26 months and the median overall survival 32.89 months. Nineteen patients (61.3%) developed skin toxicities: 7 patients (22.6%) grade 1, 9 patients (29.0%) grade 2, 3 patients (9.7%) grade 3; no grade 4 skin toxicity was observed. The median duration of grade 1 toxicity was 79 days (no specific treatments were started), of grade 2 toxicity 95 days (cost range, € 199.50-294.50) and of grade 3 toxicity 64 days (cost range, € 159.42-233.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience, through the analysis of nonselected cases, showed that the management of skin toxicities related to cetuximab is not so expensive. We recommend proper care of low-grade toxicities in order to reduce progression to high-grade toxicities and the resulting risk of hospitalization, which really impacts on costs.

Economic burden of dermatologic adverse events induced by molecularly targeted cancer agents.

OBJECTIVE: To report the financial impact of diagnosing and treating the dermatologic toxicities (dTs) that develop in patients receiving targeted anticancer therapies. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective and prospective medical record data extraction. SETTING: Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-two adults who presented between November 1, 2005, and June 30, 2008, and who were diagnosed as having 1 primary cancer type and were treated with 1 molecularly targeted agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standard billable costs to the patient for dT-related medications, clinic visits, laboratory and diagnostic testing, and therapeutic procedures. RESULTS: The 132 patients had a median of 3 clinic visits for dT management with a median cost of $1920 per patient. Sorafenib was associated with the most costly overall median cost per patient ($2509 per patient), and imatinib was associated with the least costly overall median cost per patient ($1263 per patient). Among the 7 targeted drugs and all 10 dTs, the most costly dT (measured by cost of treatment with medications) was hand/foot skin reaction, associated with sorafenib therapy (median cost, $968 per patient) (P < .001). The second most costly dT was panitumumab-associated acneiform eruption (median cost, $933 per patient) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The cost of diagnosis and treatment of dTs associated with targeted agents contributes to the overall economic burden of cancer care. Efforts toward the prevention of dTs may be important for decreasing the financial burden in oncology.

Cutaneous adverse effects of ketoprofen for topical use: clinical patterns and costs.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in France, ketoprofen for topical use has been associated with a large number of cutaneous adverse effect reports. Therefore, the French Medicine Agency progressively introduced warnings and contraindications to its use. Despite this, serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) still occur. OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical patterns and estimate costs of spontaneously reported cutaneous ADRs of topical ketoprofen. METHODS: All cases of cutaneous ADRs of topical ketoprofen reported to the Bordeaux regional pharmacovigilance center between January 1989 and December 2006 were included. Clinical patterns, in respect of adherence to recommendations, causality, seriousness, and direct costs incurred by the ADRs, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 136 cases were reported (median age: 42 years, 55.9% women). Proper use of topical ketoprofen regarding indications, warnings, and contraindications was not respected by one-third of the patients. Almost all cases occurred during sunny months. Symptoms consisted predominantly of bullous eruptions (29.4%) or contact dermatitis (27.2%). Generalized lesions were observed in 37.5% of patients. Causality was considered at least possible for most of the cases (92.6%). These ADRs induced hospital admission in 15 cases (11.0%). The total estimated cost was euro 42,962 ($US 66,559), corresponding to euro 316 per case. This mean cost was nine times higher for serious ADRs. CONCLUSION: Topical ketoprofen is used to treat benign symptoms but can be associated with serious and costly cutaneous ADRs. Furthermore, the number of cases and the calculated costs may have been greatly under-estimated in the present study.

Cutaneous reactions to thiacetazone in Zambia--implications for tuberculosis treatment strategies.

Tuberculosis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a growing threat to public health in Africa. Thiacetazone, one of the continent's most widely used antituberculous agents, may lead to severe cutaneous reactions in the HIV infected individual. We describe the impact of this reaction on the tuberculosis (TB) control programme of a district hospital in Zambia in 1990, and examine the cost implications of changing the standard treatment regime. We carried out a retrospective survey of records of all patients beginning TB treatment in 1990, together with HIV test results and the cost of all treatments given. From this we derived estimates of costs of different regimes which are and could be used in TB control in Zambia. Severe reactions occurred in 18.7% of all HIV seropositive patients receiving thiacetazone, fatally so in 1.2% (odds ratio 16.6). The greatest part of the cost of the current regime is that attributable to the inpatient stay; we estimated that 29.4% of patients would be unable to receive drugs as out-patients but, even allowing for this, rifampicin-based regimes given to outpatients where possible would not cost more than the current strategy. We conclude that ethical and economic considerations support a change to rifampicin-based regimes in areas of Africa where HIV seroprevalence is high.