Relationship between Helicobacter pylori Eradication and Barrett's Esophagus Elongation.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy may worsen gastroesophageal reflux disease that is a significant risk factor for Barrett's esophagus. However, the relationship between eradication therapy and Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. This study evaluated the impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the lengthening of Barrett's esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who successfully underwent Helicobacter pylori eradication between 2004 and 2017. Endoscopic images obtained before and after eradication therapy were compared for Barrett's esophagus length according to the Prague C&M criteria and the presence of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles classification. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients were analyzed (mean age: 66.9 ± 12.9 years) for a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range: 29.8-89.3). At the initial endoscopic assessment, 187 patients (55%) had a hiatal hernia, and all patients had gastric atrophy (C-0 to I: 2%, C-II to III: 47%, O-I to III: 51%). Reflux esophagitis was detected in 7 patients (2%) before eradication and in 21 patients (6%) afterward, which was a significant increase (p = 0.007). Barrett's esophagus was identified in 69 patients (20%) before eradication, with a median length of C0M1. Elongation after treatment was observed in only 2 patients (0.6%). We observed no significant increase in either the prevalence (p = 0.85) or the median length (p = 0.5) of Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Only 0.6% of patients exhibited Barrett's esophagus lengthening after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, suggesting no significant impact of the treatment on the development or elongation of Barrett's esophagus.

Ulcerative reflux esophagitis associated with Clostridium ventriculi following hiatoplasty - is antibiotic treatment necessary? A case report.

Clostridium (C.) ventriculi (known as Sarcina ventriculi) is a ubiquitous gram-positive, anaerobic, acidophilic coccus found in patients with gastric motility disorders. The microorganisms can be identified histologically by their characteristic presentation in tetrads or packets of 8 in hematoxylin and eosin stains. Severe cases of emphysematous gastritis or gastric perforation have been described. Nevertheless, the significance of C. ventriculi in an upper gastrointestinal tract and its pathogenic character remain unclear. We present a 67-year-old woman who underwent hiatoplasty with gastropexy. After 3 months, she underwent a gastroscopy showing gastroesophageal reflux. Biopsies showed ulcerative reflux esophagitis with presence of C.ventriculi, subsequently confirmed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. The barium swallow study revealed an atonic stomach with delayed gastric emptying. The patient was treated with PPI and domperidone. On follow up, 15 months post-operatively, a control gastroscopy showed a stomach with food residues and reflux-associated small erosions. The Clostridium organisms were detected only in oxyntic mucosa biopsies without erosions or ulcerations. We speculate that the recognition of the organisms in the biopsy material is important and suggests dysmotility disorder. However, in our opinion, the presence of C. ventriculi, even in combination with mucosal damage, does not necessarily prompt antibiotic treatment since no complications occurred and inflammation as well as gastric function improved under PPI and prokinetic therapy in our patient. Larger study groups with long-term follow-up are needed to understand whether these organisms could behave as pathogens or are only bystanders in the setting of delayed gastric emptying.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis and GERD symptoms after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm: a single-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The association between Helicobacter pylori and reflux esophagitis (RE) remains controversial. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication on RE and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) symptoms in H. pylori-positive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm. METHODS: Of the 244 patients enrolled in this study, 173 H. pylori-positive patients underwent follow-up at least once. We evaluated the prevalence of RE and GERD symptoms in these patients following H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: There were 75.7% (131/173), 78.6% (125/159), and 78.9% (105/133) subjects who were successfully eradicated after 6, 12, and 18-24 months, respectively. During the 2-year follow-up period, the eradication of H. pylori did not increase the incidence of RE (OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.49-1.77, p = 0.828). H. pylori status was also not associated with the development of GERD symptoms (OR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.47-2.95, p = 0.721). In the univariate analysis for RE, present smoking history (OR 4.79; 95% CI 1.98-11.60, p = 0.001), present alcohol consumption history (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.03-4.63, p = 0.041), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.02-5.86, p = 0.045) were found to be associated with RE. Multivariate analysis showed that present smoking history (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.84-11.02, p = 0.001) was a significant risk factor for RE. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication did not increase the incidence of RE or GERD symptoms in patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm.

Bacterial species and total bacterial load in the distal oesophagus in patients with and without clinical gastric reflux.

AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare distal oesophagus of persons with and without gastric reflux in terms of bacterial load and presence of certain bacterial species. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two biopsy specimens were obtained from the distal oesophagus at 5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction of each of the 50 patients (20 with normal oesophagus and 30 with reflux oesophagitis) under endoscopic examination and used for histological examination and DNA isolation. We used a real-time PCR-based assay to quantify the bacterial load and the presence of certain bacterial species from one of the biopsy samples. The biopsy specimens taken from the patients with reflux oesophagitis were consistent with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The bacterial load did not significantly differ between the groups (P < 0·005). CONCLUSION: While there was no difference between the bacterial load in the two groups, variation was observed in bacterial species. Most of the bacteria identified in distal oesophagus of the patients with gastroesophageal reflux were Gram negative. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The human oesophagus was considered sterile until quite recently. Molecular techniques displayed the presence of a diverse bacterial species in the oesophagus. Although it is known that dysbiosis in the oesophagus causes GERD, and that Barrett's oesophagus can trigger the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, its etiopathogenesis is not clear. A limited number of published studies support the importance of the present study.

Changes in the distal esophageal microbiota in Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis.

OBJECTIVE: Changes in microbiota composition in the distal esophagus may be associated with the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We aimed to compare the composition of distal esophageal microbiota between Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) and healthy volunteers using metagenomic high-throughput DNA sequencing and bioinformatic analyses. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (controls) and patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) were enrolled. Distal esophageal (2 cm above the gastroesophageal junction) biopsy specimens were obtained under endoscopy. Microbial DNA was extracted from the specimens, followed by 16S rDNA gene amplification and Illumina sequencing. Bioinformatic tools were applied to dissect the community structure. RESULTS: No dramatic differences in microbiota were found in RE patients compared with the controls. At the phylum level, only Bacteroidetes differed between the groups, being less abundant in the RE group. The overall number and diversity of species tended to be lower in RE patients, but there were no significant differences between the groups. Three genera, Prevotella, Helicobacter, and Moraxella, were obviously depleted in RE patients, as revealed by linear discriminant analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of distal esophageal microbiota in Chinese patients with RE showed moderate changes compared with healthy controls. To what extent these changes are associated with the pathogenesis of RE needs further investigation.

Unique causes of esophageal inflammation: a histopathologic perspective.

Gastroenterologists frequently perform endoscopic esophageal mucosal biopsies for pathologic diagnosis in patients experiencing symptoms of esophagitis. The more common causes of esophagitis diagnosed on esophageal mucosal biopsy include reflux esophagitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and infectious esophagitis caused by Candida albicans, herpes simplex virus, and/or cytomegalovirus. However, there are several causes of esophagitis seen less frequently by pathologists that are very important to recognize. We discuss unique types of esophageal inflammation, including acute bacterial esophagitis, esophageal manifestations of dermatologic diseases, medication-induced esophageal injury, and sloughing esophagitis; and we review their clinical and histopathologic features.

Association of oral Helicobacter pylori with gastric complications.

AIM: This study was aimed to identify the presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) genes in oral mucosa and find out their relationship between oral H. pylori infection and gastric complications. METHODS: This study is a case control study consists of 567 subjects with periodontal infection (278 gastric complication cases and 289 controls normal gastric intestinal mucosa) with age range of 20-80 years. Oral health status was recorded by calculating oral hygiene index (OHI), probing depths (PD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL). Each participant provided gastric biopsy and plaque samples which were subjected to H. pylori detection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with different primers specifically ß globulin, 16SrRNA, babA, cagA, ureA, ureC and vacA gene was performed which were then analyzed using gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: No significant differences (χ2 = 11.873, p value > 0.05) were observed between oral H. pylori and gastric infections/complications. However, H. pylori increase the risk of developing gastro-esophageal reflux grade II (OR = 1.458, 95%CI = 0.659-3.226), normal upper GIT mucosa with lax esophageal sphincters (OR = 1.215, 95%CI = 0.285-5.181) and duodenal ulcer/duodenitis (OR = 2.187, 95%CI = 0.225-21.278). This study also showed a significant increased risk of gastritis with babA gene. CONCLUSION: Oral pathogenic H. pylori genes may enhance the severity of the gastric infection.

The Effects of Switching to Vonoprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, on Gastric Acidity and Reflux Patterns in Patients with Erosive Esophagitis Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The effects of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) have not yet been compared using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH). METHODS: A total of 8 patients with persistent gastric mucosal injury, despite completing an 8-week standard PPI therapy, were enrolled in the study. While they were on standard PPI therapy, the baseline values of reflux parameters, holding time ratio (HTR) of gastric pH >4, and esophageal pH <4 were obtained by using 24 h MII-pH monitoring. They were re-evaluated after discontinuation of the therapy and 4 weeks of subsequent treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg/day. RESULTS: The patients were found to be CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers and negative for Helicobacter pylori infection. In 7 patients (87.5%), the mucosal lesions had healed completely after vonoprazan therapy. A significant increase in gastric pH >4 HTR was observed, from 26.5 to 78.0% (p = 0.029). A reduction in esophageal pH <4 HTR was also observed but it was not statistically significant. Furthermore, acid clearance time and the total number of reflux events, including acid and proximal reflux events, were significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan may be a better therapy for the treatment of patients with PPI-refractory RE.

Potential Role of the Microbiome in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor Barrett's esophagus have been rapidly increasing in incidence for half a century, for reasons not adequately explained by currently identified risk factors such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. The upper gastrointestinal microbiome may represent another potential cofactor. The distal esophagus has a distinct microbiome of predominantly oral-derived flora, which is altered in Barrett's esophagus and reflux esophagitis. Chronic low-grade inflammation or direct carcinogenesis from this altered microbiome may combine with known risk factors to promote Barrett's metaplasia and progression to adenocarcinoma.

Development of reflux esophagitis after H. pylori eradication therapy.

Several studies showed that H. pylori infection is significantly lower in reflux esophagitis (RE) patients than in elder asymptomatic controls in Japan. It is well known that H. pylori infection induces corporal atrophic gastritis, and suppresses gastric acid secretion. In the other words, H. pylori infection shows a negative association with the development of RE. The relative lack of corpus gastritis might play a role in the pathogenesis of RE through preservation of the acid secretion area. Meanwhile, the occurrence of RE after H. pylori eradication was first report;e' in Europe in 1997. However, no consensus has been reached on whether H. pylori eradication leads to the onset of a de-novo RE. Eradication of H. pylori infection may be a risk factor for de-novo RE, especially in Asian populations. The presence of hiatal hernia and corpus gas- tritis are closely related to the development of RE after H. pylori eradication. RE, which develops after H. pylori eradication, rarely becomes a long-term clinical problem among patients who complete therapy successfully.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis therapy: a multi-center randomized control study.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) frequently colonizes the stomach. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and costly disease. But the relationship of H. pylori and GERD is still unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of H. pylori and its eradication on reflux esophagitis therapy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with reflux esophagitis by endoscopy were enrolled; based on rapid urease test and Warth-Starry stain, they were divided into H. pylori positive and negative groups. H. pylori positive patients were randomly given H. pylori eradication treatment for 10 days, then esomeprazole 20 mg bid for 46 days. The other patients received esomeprazole 20 mg bid therapy for 8 weeks. After treatment, three patient groups were obtained: H. pylori positive eradicated, H. pylori positive uneradicated, and H. pylori negative. Before and after therapy, reflux symptoms were scored and compared. Healing rates were compared among groups. The χ2 test and t-test were used, respectively, for enumeration and measurement data. RESULTS: There were 176 H. pylori positive (with 92 eradication cases) and 180 negative cases. Healing rates in the H. pylori positive eradicated and H. pylori positive uneradicated groups reached 80.4% and 79.8% (P = 0.911), with reflux symptom scores of 0.22 and 0.14 (P = 0.588). Healing rates of esophagitis in the H. pylori positive uneradicated and H. pylori negative groups were, respectively, 79.8% and 82.2% (P = 0.848); reflux symptom scores were 0.14 and 0.21 (P = 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: Based on esomeprazole therapy, H. pylori infection and eradication have no significant effect on reflux esophagitis therapy.

Does a relationship still exist between gastroesophageal reflux and Helicobacter pylori in patients with reflux symptoms?

BACKGROUND: The nature of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux esophagitis (RE) is not fully understood. In addition, the effect of H. pylori eradication on RE and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection and the grade of GERD in patients with reflux symptoms. METHODS: Between January 2010 and July 2013, 184 consecutive patients with daily reflux symptoms for at least one year were evaluated at the ambulatory for functional esophageal disease, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients underwent a pretreatment evaluation, which included anamnesis, clinical examination, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) with biopsy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH-metry. All statistical elaborations were obtained using Statigraphies 5 plus for Window XP. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference regarding Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) pressure between patients who were H. pylori-positive and H. Pylori-negative (19.2 ± 9.5 (range: 3.7 to 46.2) and 19.7 ± 11.0 (range: 2.6 to 61), respectively). Further, no significant difference was evidenced in esophageal wave length (mean value: 3.1 seconds in H. pylori-negative patients versus 3.2 seconds in H. pylori-positive patients) or in esophageal wave height (mean value: 72.2 ± 39.3 in H. pylori-negative patients versus 67.7 ± 28.4 in H. pylori-positive patients). We observed that hiatal hernia (P = 0.01), LES opening (P = 0.05), esophageal wave length (P = 0.01) and pathological reflux number (P = 0.05) were significantly related to the presence of esophagitis. However, H. pylori infection was not significantly related to the presence of reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical, endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric data shows no significant role of H. pylori infection in the development of GERD or in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis. However, current data do not provide sufficient evidence to define this relationship and further prospective large studies are needed.

Esophageal Helicobacter pylori colonization aggravates esophageal injury caused by reflux.

AIM: To investigate esophageal Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) colonization on esophageal injury caused by reflux and the related mechanisms. METHODS: An esophagitis model, with acid and bile reflux, was surgically produced in male rats. The rats were randomly divided into either: (1) an esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis (EGDA) group; (2) an EGDA with H. pylori infection group; (3) a pseudo-operation with H. pylori infection group; or (4) a pseudo-operation group. All rats were kept for 36 wk. Based on the location of H. pylori colonization, the EGDA rats with H. pylori infection were subdivided into those with concomitant esophageal H. pylori colonization or those with only gastric H. pylori colonization. The esophageal injuries were evaluated grossly and microscopically. The expressions of CDX2 and MUC2 were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. Ki-67 antigen expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. The mRNA levels of cyclin D1, c-Myc, Bax and Bcl-2 were determined by RT-PCR. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using the TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling method. RESULTS: Esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) developed in rats that underwent EGDA. When comparing rats with EGDA and concomitant esophageal H. pylori colonization to EGDA-only rats, the severity of injury (87.9 ± 5.2 vs 77.2 ± 8.6, macroscopically, 92.5 ± 8.0 vs 83.8 ± 5.5, microscopically, both P < 0.05) and the incidences of BE (80.0% vs 33.3%, P = 0.055) and EAC (60.0% vs 11.1%, P < 0.05) were increased. These increases were associated with upregulation of CDX2 and MUC2 mRNA (10.1 ± 5.4 vs 3.0 ± 2.9, 8.4 ± 4.6 vs 2.0 ± 3.2, respectively, Ps < 0.01) and protein (8.1 ± 2.3 vs 3.3 ± 3.1, 7.3 ± 4.0 vs 1.8 ± 2.7, respectively, all P < 0.05). The expression of Ki-67 (8.9 ± 0.7 vs 6.0 ± 1.7, P < 0.01) and the presence of apoptotic cells (8.3 ± 1.1 vs 5.3 ± 1.7, P < 0.01) were also increased significantly in rats with EGDA and concomitant esophageal H. pylori colonization compared with rats with EGDA only. The mRNA levels of cyclin D1 (5.8 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.3, P < 0.01), c-Myc (6.4 ± 1.7 vs 3.7 ± 1.2, P < 0.01), and Bax (8.6 ± 1.6 vs 5.1 ± 1.3, P < 0.01) were significantly increased, whereas the mRNA level of Bcl-2 (0.6 ± 0.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.3, P < 0.01) was significantly reduced in rats with EGDA and concomitant esophageal H. pylori colonization compared with rats with EGDA only. CONCLUSION: Esophageal H. pylori colonization increases esophagitis severity, and facilitates the development of BE and EAC with the augmentation of cell proliferation and apoptosis in esophageal mucosa.

A pilot study of Helicobacter pylori genotypes and cytokine gene polymorphisms in reflux oesophagitis and peptic ulcer disease.

Helicobacter pylori causes various diseases such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. While majority of the people infected with H. pylori is asymptomatic, 15-20 % of them develop such diseases. The main factors, which determine the development of H. pylori related diseases might be bacterial virulence, host genetic and environmental factors.The aim of this study was to reveal the factors that play a role in the disease development in patients with reflux esophagitis and peptic ulcer, infected with Helicobacter pylori. Environmental factors such as medical agents, smoking and body mass index were evaluated. The factors specific to bacteria such as vacA, CagA, babA and iceA virulence genotypes and the host factors such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, interferon-γ, TNF-α, ve TGF-ß1 gene polymorphisms were compared between the two groups.H. pylori infected twenty five patients with reflux esophagitis and peptic ulcer were enrolled in the study. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding environmental factors. IL-2 -330T +166T (p=0.037) and IL10 -1082A; -819C (p=0.049) gene polymorphisms were significantly more common in the group of patients with peptic ulcer compared to the group with reflux esophagitis. In both groups of patients, either with reflux esophagitis or peptic ulcer, multiple H. pylori virulence genotypes (cagA, vacA, babA) (mean values 74 %, 78 %, 54 % respectively) were observed.In this study, we revealed that cytokine gene polymorphisms may play a role in the development peptic ulcer while H. pylori virulence genotypes seem to be crucial for the development of associated diseases (Tab. 4, Ref. 51).

Background factors of reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease: a cross-sectional study of 10,837 subjects in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), its risk factors are still a subject of controversy. This is probably due to inadequate distinction between reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), and is also due to inadequate evaluation of adjacent stomach. Our aim is therefore to define background factors of RE and NERD independently, based on the evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric atrophy. METHODS: We analyzed 10,837 healthy Japanese subjects (6,332 men and 4,505 women, aged 20-87 years) who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RE was diagnosed as the presence of mucosal break, and NERD was diagnosed as the presence of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation in RE-free subjects. Using GERD-free subjects as control, background factors for RE and NERD were separately analyzed using logistic regression to evaluate standardized coefficients (SC), odds ratio (OR), and p-value. RESULTS: Of the 10,837 study subjects, we diagnosed 733 (6.8%) as RE and 1,722 (15.9%) as NERD. For RE, male gender (SC = 0.557, OR = 1.75), HP non-infection (SC = 0.552, OR = 1.74), higher pepsinogen I/II ratio (SC = 0.496, OR = 1.64), higher BMI (SC = 0.464, OR = 1.60), alcohol drinking (SC = 0.161, OR = 1.17), older age (SC = 0.148, OR = 1.16), and smoking (SC = 0.129, OR = 1.14) are positively correlated factors. For NERD, HP infection (SC = 0.106, OR = 1.11), female gender (SC = 0.099, OR = 1.10), younger age (SC = 0.099, OR = 1.10), higher pepsinogen I/II ratio (SC = 0.099, OR = 1.10), smoking (SC = 0.080, OR = 1.08), higher BMI (SC = 0.078, OR = 1.08), and alcohol drinking (SC = 0.076, OR = 1.08) are positively correlated factors. Prevalence of RE in subjects with chronic HP infection and successful HP eradication denotes significant difference (2.3% and 8.8%; p<0.0001), whereas that of NERD shows no difference (18.2% and 20.8%; p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly associated factors of NERD are considerably different from those of RE, indicating that these two disorders are pathophysiologically distinct. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori may have disadvantageous effects on RE but not on NERD.

Characterization of bacterial biota in the distal esophagus of Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The distal esophagus harbors a complex bacterial population. We hypothesized that a better understanding of bacterial communities in the esophagus would facilitate understanding of the role of bacteria in esophageal disease. Here, we investigated bacterial composition in the distal esophagus in subjects with a normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Two biopsy specimens were obtained from the distal esophagus at 1 cm above the gastroesophageal junction under endoscopic examination in 18 patients (6 each with normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus) and used for histological examination and DNA extraction. Fragments of 16S rDNA genes were amplified by PCR using general bacterial primers, and bacterial populations were examined. A third biopsy specimen was taken from the patients with Barrett's esophagus to histologically confirm the replacement of squamous epithelium with columnar epithelium in the distal esophagus. RESULTS: Endoscopic diagnoses of normal esophagus, esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus were confirmed by histological findings. The total amount of bacterial DNA detected did not significantly differ among groups (p > 0.1). On average, each of the 18 subjects yielded about 350 clones, of which 40 were randomly picked and sequenced. Analysis of 147 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 subjects with normal esophagus yielded four phyla, Proteobacteria (49%), Firmicutes (40%), Bacteroidetes (8%), and Actinobacteria (3%). Similar analysis of 139 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 patients with reflux esophagitis yielded 6 phyla, Proteobacteria (43%), Firmicutes (33%), Bacteroidetes (10%), Fusobacteria (10%), Actinobacteria (2%), and TM7 (2%). while that of 138 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 cases of Barrett's esophagus yielded 5 phyla, Firmicutes (55%), Proteobacteria (20%), Bacteroidetes (14%), Fusobacteria (9%), and Actinobacteria (2%). Thus, microbial communities differed among patients with a normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal bacterial composition differs under conditions of normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. Diverse bacterial communities may be associated with esophageal disease.

[Clinical epidemic interaction of reflux esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents].

INTRODUCTION: the role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) stays disputable. AIM: to determine clinical-epidemic correlations between reflux-esophagitis (RE) and HP in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 300 children and adolescents 12-18 years old with RE were examined. HP was diagnosed by histological (Giemza stain with the evaluation of dissemination grade) and rapid urease test. Subjective symptoms (heartburn, abdominal pain, other dyspeptic and astenovegetative complaints) and possible predisposing factors (frequent stresses, carbohydrates in food, education of parents, chronic nidi of infection, presence of pets at home) were analyzed by questionnaire. RESULTS: HP infection was found in 45% children and adolescents with RE, and it does not increase the risk of erosive esophageal defects. Clinical symptoms don't connect with microorganism in examined patients. The frequency of HP infection decreases with the increase of disease anamnesis and presence of pets, increases in cases of primary carbohydrate food and does not associate with stress, educational level of parents and chronic nidi of infection. CONCLUSION: The development of RE does not connect with HP, but the course of disease has certain peculiarities in conditions of HP infection.

Helicobacter pylori infection and gastritis: the Systematic Investigation of gastrointestinaL diseases in China (SILC).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Helicobacter pylori infection remains common in East Asia, though its prevalence is decreasing in Western countries. H. pylori-related atrophic gastritis (AG) may reduce the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the prevalence of H. pylori infection and AG and their association with endoscopic findings and symptom-defined GERD in Shanghai. METHODS: A representative random sample of 3600 Shanghai residents aged 18-80 years was invited to complete a general information questionnaire and a Chinese version of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire, to provide blood samples for H. pylori serology and pepsinogen (PG) I/II assay (to detect AG, defined as PGI < 70 µg/L and/or PGI/PGII < 7), and to undergo endoscopy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1022 Shanghai residents underwent endoscopy and were valid for inclusion in the study. Of these, 71.7% tested positive for H. pylori, 63.8% had AG and 30.5% had moderate/severe AG (PGI < 50 µg/L and/or PGI/PGII < 5). Helicobacter pylori infection was equally common in all age groups. Severity of AG increased with age in women. Reflux esophagitis was inversely associated with AG (OR, 0.23 [CI, 0.09-0.55] for moderate/severe AG compared with no H. pylori or gastritis). However, symptom-defined GERD showed no clear association with AG. CONCLUSIONS: Helicobacter pylori infection and AG are very common in Shanghai, and the infection is acquired early in life. Atrophic gastritis is inversely associated with reflux esophagitis but is not significantly associated with symptom-defined GERD.

Interleukin-1beta and -10 polymorphisms influence erosive reflux esophagitis and gastritis in Taiwanese patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection induces cytokine production and is associated with gastrointestinal diseases. This study examined the relationship of gene polymorphisms, including interleukin (IL)-1beta, -10, -8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), H. pylori infection, and susceptibility to gastrointestinal disorders in Taiwanese patients. METHODS: IL-1beta-511/-31/+3953, -10-1082/-819/-592, -8-251, and TNF-alpha-308 polymorphisms were assessed in 628 gastrointestinal disease patients, and 176 healthy controls were analyzed using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. RESULTS: IL-1beta-511 T/T and -31 C/C genotypes, and IL-1beta-511 T and -31 C alleles were associated with an increased risk of reflux esophagitis (P = 0.034, odds ratio [OR] = 1.384, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023-1.871; P = 0.031, OR = 1.388, 95% CI: 1.028-1.873; P = 0.044, OR = 1.342, 95% CI: 1.008-1.786; and P = 0.040, OR = 1.349, 95% CI: 1.014-1.796, respectively). No relationship was found between H. pylori infection and the risk of reflux esophagitis. IL-10-819 C/T and -10-592 A/C genotypes and IL-10-1082/-819/-592 ATA/ACC and ATA/GCC haplotypes were associated with an increased risk of gastritis (P = 0.021, OR = 1.721, 95% CI: 1.084-2.733; P = 0.016, OR = 1.766, 95% CI: 1.112-2.805; P = 0.039, OR = 1.662, 95% CI: 1.024-2.697; and P = 0.035, OR = 1.600, 95% CI: 1.024-2.499, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among Taiwanese patients, IL-1beta and -10 polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of erosive reflux esophagitis and gastritis, respectively.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on reflux esophagitis and reflux symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association between current Helicobacter pylori infection and reflux esophagitis and the effect of H. pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis in a healthy screening population. METHODS: A total of 10,102 subjects in a comprehensive screening cohort were enrolled, and 4,007 subjects had follow-up after a median of 2 years. Effects of H. pylori infection on reflux esophagitis were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression analysis. We evaluated the change in prevalence of reflux esophagitis and reflux symptoms after H. pylori eradication vs. persistence. RESULTS: The prevalence of reflux esophagitis (as classified by the Los Angeles system) was 4.9% (490/10,102). Whereas the prevalence of reflux esophagitis was 6.4% (319/4,971) in subjects without H. pylori infection, it was 3.3% (171/5,131) in subjects with infection (P<0.001). H. pylori infection had a strong negative association with reflux esophagitis in multivariate analysis (OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.51). Compared with the prevalence of reflux esophagitis in the persistent infection group, the prevalence of reflux esophagitis increased after successful H. pylori eradication (OR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.45-3.76; P<0.001), which was comparable to that of the H. pylori-negative group (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.73-3.36; P<0.001). However, reflux symptoms had no association with H. pylori infection or eradication. CONCLUSIONS: In a healthy screening population, H. pylori infection had a strong negative association with reflux esophagitis, but H. pylori eradication increased the prevalence of erosive esophagitis to the level of H. pylori-negative individuals. Long-term clinical significance of newly developed erosive esophagitis after H. pylori eradication should be evaluated prospectively.