RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Management of esophageal perforation includes open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and endoscopic stent placement. This study analyzed initial treatment and the associated short-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2019 identified adults >18 years with esophageal perforation undergoing an initial nonelective esophageal procedure categorized into either open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, or endoscopic stent placement. Patients with esophageal cancer were excluded. Baseline characteristics and the van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were identified. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and postintervention complications. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to compare in-hospital survival. RESULTS: In total, 3,345 patients met inclusion criteria: the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 50-72 years), and 1,310 (39%) were female. Open procedure was pursued in 2,650 (79%), minimally invasive surgery in 310 (9%), and endoscopic stent placement in 385 (12%) with no differences in van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index or mortality. Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a greater proportion of gastrointestinal complications (P = .006); otherwise, there were no differences in postintervention complications. In total, 380 (11%) patients died and were significantly older, with greater van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and had more postintervention complications. Univariable Cox regression identified age (hazard ratio 1.95, P < .001), van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio 1.06, P < .001), stent placement (hazard ratio 1.93, P = .045), and transfer from a health facility (HR 2.40, P = .049) as associated with decreased in-hospital survival. Multivariable Cox regression revealed age (hazard ratio 1.041, P < .001) and van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser comorbidity index (hazard ratio 1.055, P < .001) were associated with decreased in-hospital survival. CONCLUSION: Patients with esophageal perforation had an 11% in-hospital mortality rate and significant associated complications regardless of intervention. Increasing age and comorbidities are associated with poorer in-hospital survival.
Asunto(s)
Perforación del Esófago , Stents , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Perforación del Esófago/cirugía , Perforación del Esófago/mortalidad , Perforación del Esófago/terapia , Perforación del Esófago/epidemiología , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
High quality Barrett's esophagus surveillance is crucial to detect early neoplastic changes. An esophageal cell collection device (OCCD) was introduced as a triage tool for Barrett's surveillance. This study aims to evaluate whether the Scottish OCCD program (CytoSCOT) has reduced delays to Barrett's surveillance, and whether delayed surveillance negatively impacts endoscopic pathology. All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards between 14/9/2020 and 13/9/2022 were identified. Patients were dichotomised into two groups (Year 1 vs. Year 2), with individual records interrogated to record demographics, recommended surveillance interval, time from last endoscopy to OCCD test, and OCCD result. Patients were deemed high-risk if the OCCD demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. Further analysis was performed on patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD testing. A total of 3223 OCCD tests were included in the analysis (1478 in Year 1; 1745 in Year 2). In Year 1 versus Year 2, there was a longer median delay to surveillance (9 vs. 5 months; P < 0.001), increased proportion of patients with delayed surveillance (72.6% vs. 57.0%; P < 0.001), and more high-risk patients (12.0% vs. 5.3%; P < 0.001). 425/3223 patients (13.2%) were further investigated with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 57.9% of which were high-risk. As surveillance delay increased beyond 24 months, high-risk patients were significantly more likely to develop dysplasia or malignancy (P = 0.004). Delayed Barrett's esophagus surveillance beyond 24 months is associated with increased risk of pre-cancerous pathology. The CytoSCOT program has reduced delays in surveillance, promoting earlier detection of dysplasia and reducing burden on endoscopy services.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagoscopía , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Escocia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Esófago/patología , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite research efforts, the causative factors that contribute to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in high-risk areas have not yet been understood. In this study, we, therefore, aimed to describe the risk factors associated with ESCC and its precursor lesions. METHODS: We performed an endoscopic examination of 44,857 individuals aged 40-69 years from five high incidence regions of China in 2017-2018. Participants were classified as 4 groups of normal control, esophagitis, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HGIN/ESCC) using an unconditional logistic regression determine risk factors. RESULTS: We identified 4890 esophagitis, 1874 LGIN and 437 HGIN/ESCC cases. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Drinking well and surface water, salty diet, and positive family history of cancer were the common risk factors for esophagitis, LGIN and HGIN/ESCC. History of chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis was the greatest risk factor of esophagitis (adjusted OR 2.96, 95%CI 2.52-3.47) and HGIN/ESCC (adjusted OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.03-3.22). Pesticide exposure (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.37) was essential risk factor of LGIN. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals aged 40-69 years in high incidence regions of upper gastrointestinal cancer, the results provided important epidemiological evidence for the prevention of different precancerous lesions of ESCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/etiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiología , Carcinoma in Situ/patología , China/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Dieta/efectos adversos , Agua Potable/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Esofagitis/diagnóstico , Esofagitis/epidemiología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Cloruro de Sodio Dietético/efectos adversos , Abastecimiento de AguaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an endoscopic alternative to surgical myotomy in patients with achalasia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of POEM.A total of 20 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between October 2016 and November 2017 were prospectively recruited. The intraoperative esophagogastric junction distensibility index (mm2/mm Hg) was measured pre- and post-myotomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe. Clinical response was defined as Eckardt score ≤3. Health-related quality of life was measured by the 36-item short-form health survey score.POEM was successfully completed in all cases. The median procedure time was 68.5 minutes (range 50.0-120.0), and the median myotomy length was 13âcm (range 11-18). Major adverse events were encountered in 2 cases. Overall, clinical responses were observed in all patients during a median follow-up of 11.9âmonths (range 1.2-26.2). Postoperative esophagogastric junction distensibility index was significantly higher than baseline (from 1.3 [range 0.8-6.9] to 6.3 [range 25-19.2], Pâ<â.001). The median Eckardt scores were decreased after POEM (5 [range 2-11] to 1 [range 0-3], Pâ<â.001), and the 36-item short-form health survey score was also improved significantly after POEM (67.5 [range 34.5-93.9] to 85.7 [range 53.4-93.3], Pâ=â.004).POEM is an effective treatment for achalasia, based on the improvement of both symptoms and objective measures.Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02989883.
Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/normas , Miotomía/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miotomía/métodos , Miotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cryotherapy is a cold-based ablative therapy used primarily as second line therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who have persistent dysplasia after undergoing endoscopic treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Few studies have described the use of cryotherapy as a primary treatment modality for dysplastic or neoplastic BE. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of cryotherapy as primary treatment of dysplastic and/or neoplastic BE by conducting a systemic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from January 2000 through March 2020. Articles included were observational studies and clinical trials which included patients who had biopsy confirmed dysplastic or neoplastic BE (i.e., high grade dysplasia (HGD), low grade dysplasia (LGD) or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (ImCA)), underwent ≥1 session of cryotherapy, and had a follow-up endoscopy. Primary outcomes were pooled proportions of patients achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and/or intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) by using a random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen studies making up 405 patients with follow-up ranging from 3-54 months were included. In 13 studies, a total of 321/405 patients achieved CE-D with a pooled proportion of 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-94.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.3%). In 13 studies, a total of 321/405 patients achieved CE-D with a pooled proportion of 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-94.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.3%). Subgroup analysis of only high-quality studies revealed a pooled proportion of CE-D 91.3% (95% CI, 83.0-97.4, I2 = 69.5%) and pooled proportion of CE-IM of 71.6% (95% CI, 59.0-82.9, I2 = 80.9%). Adverse events were reported in 12.2% patients. CONCLUSION: Cryotherapy is a safe and effective primary therapy for dysplastic/early neoplastic BE. CE-D and CE-IM rates are comparable to those for other ablation modalities, including RFA. Cryotherapy should be considered for primary therapy of dysplastic BE and early esophageal neoplasia.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Criocirugía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Mucosa Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Mucosa Esofágica/patología , Mucosa Esofágica/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: An automated risk prediction assay has previously been shown to objectively identify patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) who are at increased risk of malignant progression. To evaluate the predictive performance of the assay in 76 patients with NDBE of which 38 progressed to high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma (progressors) and 38 did not (nonprogressors) and to determine whether assessment of additional (spatial) levels per endoscopy and/or multiple (temporal) time points improves assay performance. METHODS: In a blinded, nested case-control cohort, progressors and nonprogressors were matched (age, sex, and Barrett's esophagus length). All random biopsy levels from the baseline endoscopy (spatial samples) and all available previous endoscopies back to 10 years before progression (temporal samples) were assayed. Because the 1:1 ratio of progressors to nonprogressors does not reflect the real-world Barrett's population, negative and positive predictive values were adjusted for prevalence. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (58 men), mean age of 63 ± 9 years, were studied. A high-risk score was associated with a prevalence-adjusted annual progression rate of 6.9%. The assay identified 31% of progressors when assessing a single biopsy level from the baseline endoscopy. Sensitivity increased to 50% and 69% in spatial and temporal analyses, respectively, while specificity remained at 95%. DISCUSSION: The assay identified a significant subset of NDBE patients who progress at a rate comparable with published estimates for expert-confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Assessing additional spatial and temporal biopsies increased the predictive accuracy, allowing for identification of most future progressors. Additional studies will evaluate the predictive performance of the assay in low-prevalence settings.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Esófago/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Espacio-TemporalRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As novel, less invasive (non)endoscopic techniques for detection of Barrett's esophagus (BE) have been developed, there is now renewed interest in screening for BE and related neoplasia. We aimed to determine public preferences for esophageal adenocarcinoma screening to understand the potential of minimally invasive screening modalities. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted in 1,500 individuals, aged 50-75 years, from the general population. Individuals were repeatedly asked to choose between screening scenarios based on conventional upper endoscopy, transnasal endoscopy, nonendoscopic cell collection devices, breath analysis, and a blood test, combined with various levels of test sensitivity and specificity, and no screening. A multinomial logit model was used to estimate individuals' preferences and to calculate expected participation rates. RESULTS: In total, 554 respondents (36.9%) completed the survey. The average predicted uptake was 70.5% (95% confidence interval: 69.1%-71.8%). Test sensitivity (47.7%), screening technique (32.6%), and specificity (19.7%) affected screening participation (all P < 0.05). A low test sensitivity had the highest impact on screening participation, resulting in a 25.0% (95% confidence interval: 22.6%-27.7%) decrease. Respondents preferred noninvasive screening tests over endoscopic and capsule-based techniques, but only if sensitivity and specificity were above 80%. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that individuals generally prefer noninvasive BE screening tests. However, these tests would unlikely improve screening uptake when associated with a much lower accuracy for detecting BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with conventional upper endoscopy. Improving accuracy of minimally invasive screening strategies and informing the target population about these accuracies is therefore essential to maximally stimulate screening participation.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/prevención & control , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/sangre , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Pruebas Respiratorias , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Mucosa Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Mucosa Esofágica/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangre , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevención & control , Esofagoscopía/psicología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Duodenoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Gastroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Diagnóstico Tardío , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In a previous study we demonstrated that a simple training programme improved quality indicators of Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) achieving the recommended benchmarks. However, the long-term effect of this intervention is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of OGDs performed 3 years after of having completed a training programme. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative study of 2 cohorts was designed as follows: Group A included OGDs performed in 2016 promptly after a training programme and Group B with OGDs performed from January to March 2019, this group was also divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup B1 of Endoscopists who had participated in the previous training programme and subgroup B2 of Endoscopists who had not. The intra-procedure quality indicators proposed by ASGE-ACG were used. RESULTS: A total of 1236 OGDs were analysed, 600 from Group A and 636 from Group B (439 subgroup B1 and 197 subgroup B2). The number of complete examinations was lower in Group B (566 [94.3%] vs. 551 [86.6%]; p<0.001). A significant decrease was observed in nearly all quality indicators and they did not reach the recommended benchmarks: retroflexion in the stomach (96% vs. 81%; p<0.001); Seattle biopsy protocol (86% vs. 50%; p=0.03), description of the upper GI bleeding lesion (100% vs. 62%; p<0.01), sufficient intestinal biopsy specimens (at least 4) in suspected coeliac disease (92.5% vs. 18%; p<0.001), photo documentation of the lesion (94% vs. 90%; p<0.05). Regarding the overall assessment of the procedure (including correct performance and adequate photo documentation), a significant decrease was also observed (90.5% vs. 62%; p<0.001). There were no differences between subgroups B1 and B2. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement observed in 2016 after a training programme did not prevail after 3 years. In order to keep the quality of OGDs above the recommended benchmarks, it is necessary to implement continuous training programmes.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Duodenoscopía/normas , Esofagoscopía/normas , Gastroscopía/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Biopsia/normas , Enfermedad Celíaca/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Duodenoscopía/educación , Duodenoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esofagoscopía/educación , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroscopía/educación , Gastroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Intestinos/patología , Fotograbar , Desarrollo de Programa , Estándares de Referencia , Sociedades Médicas , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/educación , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning computer-aided detection (CAD) system, suitable for use in real time in clinical practice, to improve endoscopic detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). METHODS: We developed a hybrid ResNet-UNet model CAD system using 5 independent endoscopy data sets. We performed pretraining using 494,364 labeled endoscopic images collected from all intestinal segments. Then, we used 1704 unique esophageal high-resolution images of rigorously confirmed early-stage neoplasia in BE and nondysplastic BE, derived from 669 patients. System performance was assessed by using data sets 4 and 5. Data set 5 was also scored by 53 general endoscopists with a wide range of experience from 4 countries to benchmark CAD system performance. Coupled with histopathology findings, scoring of images that contained early-stage neoplasia in data sets 2-5 were delineated in detail for neoplasm position and extent by multiple experts whose evaluations served as the ground truth for segmentation. RESULTS: The CAD system classified images as containing neoplasms or nondysplastic BE with 89% accuracy, 90% sensitivity, and 88% specificity (data set 4, 80 patients and images). In data set 5 (80 patients and images) values for the CAD system vs those of the general endoscopists were 88% vs 73% accuracy, 93% vs 72% sensitivity, and 83% vs 74% specificity. The CAD system achieved higher accuracy than any of the individual 53 nonexpert endoscopists, with comparable delineation performance. CAD delineations of the area of neoplasm overlapped with those from the BE experts in all detected neoplasia in data sets 4 and 5. The CAD system identified the optimal site for biopsy of detected neoplasia in 97% and 92% of cases (data sets 4 and 5, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We developed, validated, and benchmarked a deep-learning computer-aided system for primary detection of neoplasia in patients with BE. The system detected neoplasia with high accuracy and near-perfect delineation performance. The Netherlands National Trials Registry, Number: NTR7072.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico por imagen , Benchmarking , Diagnóstico por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation for esophageal anastomotic strictures, and to compare response between caustic anastomotic strictures (CAS) and non-caustic anastomotic strictures (NCAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with anastomotic strictures (enrolled during January 1996-December 2015) were analyzed. Short- and long-term outcomes of dilation, in terms of clinical success, refractory, and recurrent strictures were compared between NCAS and CAS. Patients with refractory and recurrent strictures were managed with adjunctive therapy including intralesional steroids. Factors predicting refractoriness at start of dilation and reasons for more than ten lifetime dilations were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients, 124 (mean age-44.02; males-74) underwent dilation. Clinical success was achieved in 113 (91.3%) patients requiring a median [Interquartile range (IQR)] of 4 (2-10) sessions. The number of dilations to achieve clinical success, refractory strictures, and recurrent strictures, and the use of adjunctive therapy were significantly higher for CAS than for NCAS. Intralesional steroid use decreased periodic dilation index (PDI) significantly in CAS. Caustic etiology and starting dilation diameter of < 10 mm were found to be predictors of refractoriness, with the former alone being an independent predictor of more than ten lifetime dilations. No patient had free perforation; however, five required revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAS fared worse than those with NCAS in terms of number of dilations, refractoriness, recurrence of strictures, and need of adjunctive therapy. Endoscopic dilation can successfully ameliorate dysphagia due to anastomotic strictures in a majority of patients.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Químicas/cirugía , Dilatación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Quemaduras Químicas/complicaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Dilatación/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Combine techniques commonly employed in the clinical workup of patients with isolated globus sensation to identify the most common pharyngoesophageal abnormality. The primary aim was to retrospectively review high-resolution manometry, pH probe testing, contrast videofluoroscopy, and endoscopy studies in patients with a primary complaint of globus sensation. The specific hypothesis was esophageal high-resolution manometry identifies the most significant proportion of abnormalities compared to all other modalities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: An inclusive retrospective chart review was performed for patients evaluated between 2009 and 2016 with the primary complaint of globus sensation. Age at testing, self-identified gender, associated diagnoses, and results from each modality were collected. Descriptive statistics and pairwise comparisons were performed as well as sensitivity and specificity calculations. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. The cohort had an age range of 22.7 to 88.5 years and was predominantly female. Esophageal manometry identified abnormalities in 62.8% of patients, and pH testing identified abnormal acidification in approximately 20%. The esophagram identified abnormalities in 24% of patients, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy identified abnormalities in 22%. Modified barium swallows were normal in 93% of patients. Measures of sensitivity and specificity of other modalities were poor compared to esophageal manometry and pH testing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated globus sensation have evidence of esophageal dysmotility and laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease in high proportions. Esophageal high-resolution manometry testing identifies the greatest proportion of abnormalities of the investigated modalities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2120-2125, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Cinerradiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitorización del pH Esofágico/estadística & datos numéricos , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Globo Faríngeo/diagnóstico , Manometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cinerradiografía/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico , Monitorización del pH Esofágico/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esófago/fisiopatología , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Globo Faríngeo/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Manometría/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Children experience serious gastrointestinal tract injuries due to consumption of caustic agents more often than adults. The aim of the study was to analyze diagnostic methods and treatment of children with esophageal burns according to the degree of the injury. METHODS: Our one-center population-based retrospective cohort study included 150 children admitted between 1967 and 2018 to Clinic of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Phoniatrics and Audiology of University Children's Hospital in Lublin, Poland, due to the chemical burn of the mouth, throat, larynx, and esophagus. Each patient underwent a thorough laryngological examination and endoscopy to assess the place and degree of injury. RESULTS: Of 150 patients, 65.3% were male and 34.7% female. The median age was 4 years and 3 months. Salivation, dysphagia, burning sensation, edema, and whitish coating on the oral mucosa, palate, and throat were the most common clinical symptoms. In addition, dyspnea and chest pain were observed in 30% of patients. Esophagus endoscopy results were: Zargar grade I burn (84.7%), grade IIA (8%), grade IIB (2.6%), grade III (0%), and grade 0 (4.7%). Treatment included antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, analgesics, and intravenous fluid therapy. Late sequelae (scarred esophageal strictures) developed in 20 (13.3%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Accidental intake of caustic agents is observed in young children, especially younger than the age of 5. Early esophagus endoscopy should be performed in all patients to assess the grade of injury, plan initial treatment, and predict the risk of developing complications. Early diagnosis and immediate pharmacological treatment reduce the number of late sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Químicas/epidemiología , Cáusticos/toxicidad , Estenosis Esofágica/epidemiología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esófago/lesiones , Quemaduras Químicas/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Estenosis Esofágica/inducido químicamente , Estenosis Esofágica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This study aimed to compare clinical results, symptom relief, quality of life and patient satisfaction after the 2 most common procedures for achalasia treatment: laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD).Patients treated at University Hospital of Heidelberg with LHM or EBD were included. A retrospective chart review of perioperative data and a prospective follow-up of therapeutic efficiency, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and patient satisfaction was conducted.Follow-up data (mean follow-up: 75.1â±â53.9 months for LHM group and 78.9â±â45.6 months for EBD) were obtained from 36 patients (19 LHM; 17 EBD). Eckardt score (median (q1,q3): 2 (1,4) in both groups, Pâ=â.91, GIQLI (LHM: 117 (91.5, 126) vs EBD: 120 (116, 128), Pâ=â.495) and patient satisfaction (3 (2,3) vs 3 (2,4), Pâ=â.883) did not differ between groups. Fifteen patients (78.9%) in LHM group and 11 (64.7%) in EBD group (Pâ=â.562) stated they would undergo the intervention again. All patients with EBD had at least 2 dilatations (100%), whilst only 2 patients (10.5%) had dilatation after LHM (Pâ<â.001). There were no complications after EBD, but 2 after LHM (10.5%, Pâ=â.517).Both LHM and EBD are able to control symptoms and provide similar quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, reintervention rate was higher following EBD, hence LHM provided a more sustained treatment than EBD.
Asunto(s)
Dilatación/estadística & datos numéricos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Miotomía de Heller/estadística & datos numéricos , Dilatación/instrumentación , Dilatación/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Symptoms of esophageal dysfunction such as food impaction are consistent with, but not diagnostic for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) without obtaining histology. We conducted a retrospective study to characterize patients with food impaction at a tertiary center. We hypothesized that many patients with food impaction may be lost to follow-up and that many have features suggestive of EoE. Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with esophageal food impaction were identified from an endoscopic database. Electronic medical records were manually abstracted. We examined associations between demographics, comorbid conditions, and follow-up with biopsy findings. Of 220 patients who presented to the emergency department for food impaction, 74.1% were men. Adequate follow-up was not documented in 120 (54.5%). Those lost to follow-up did not differ significantly by gender, age at symptom onset, or distance from hospital compared to those with follow-up. Esophageal biopsies were obtained in 158 (71.8%), and those with ≥15 eos/HPF were more likely to be lost to follow-up than those with <15 eos/HPF (52.8% vs. 34.8%, P < 0.05). Of those never biopsied, 79.0% were lost to follow-up and had intermediate proportions of males, food allergy, and asthma when compared to those with and without eosinophilic inflammation. Patients with food impaction commonly have EoE but are often lost to follow-up. Among those never biopsied, demographic and clinical features suggest that many may have undiagnosed EoE. Strategies for increasing use of biopsies in patients with food impaction and improving follow-up are needed to diagnose and manage EoE.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/cirugía , Esófago/lesiones , Alimentos/efectos adversos , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Perdida de Seguimiento , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Quality indicators have been proposed for endoscopic eradication therapy of Barrett's esophagus (BE). One such measure suggests that complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) should be achieved within 18 months of starting treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether achievement of CE-IM within 18 months is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of BE patients who underwent endoscopic eradication. Time to CE-IM was recorded and categorized as ≤ or > 18 months. The main outcome measures were recurrence of IM and of dysplasia after CE-IM, defined as a single endoscopy without endoscopic evidence of BE or histologic evidence of intestinal metaplasia. Recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. A total of 290 patients were included in the analyses. The baseline histology was high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in 74.2% of patients. CE-IM was achieved in 85.5% of patients, and 54.1% of the cohort achieved CE-IM within 18 months. Achieving CE-IM within 18 months was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence of IM or dysplasia in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. In this cohort, older age and increased BE length were associated with IM recurrence, and increased hiatal hernia size was associated with dysplasia recurrence. Compared to longer times, achieving CE-IM within 18 months was not associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of IM or dysplasia. Alternative evidence-based quality metrics for endoscopic eradication therapy should be identified.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Carcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Intestinos/patología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Intestinos/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metaplasia/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Surveillance interval protocols after complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) post radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in Barrett's oesophagus (BE) are currently empiric and not based on substantial evidence. We aimed to assess the timeline, location and patterns of recurrence following CRIM to inform these guidelines. DESIGN: Data on patients undergoing RFA for BE were obtained from prospectively maintained databases of five (three USA and two UK) tertiary referral centres. RFA was performed until CRIM was confirmed on two consecutive endoscopies. RESULTS: 594 patients achieved CRIM as of 1 May 2017. 151 subjects developed recurrent BE over a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.8 (1.4-4.4) years. There was 19% cumulative recurrence risk of any BE within 2 years and an additional 49% risk over the next 8.6 years. There was no evidence of a clinically meaningful change in the recurrence hazard rate of any BE, dysplastic BE or high-grade dysplasia/cancer over the duration of follow-up, with an estimated 2% (95% CI -7% to 12%) change in recurrence rate of any BE in a doubling of follow-up time. 74% of BE recurrences developed at the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) (24.1% were dysplastic) and 26% in the tubular oesophagus. The yield of random biopsies from the tubular oesophagus, in the absence of visible lesions, was 1% (BE) and 0.2% (dysplasia). CONCLUSIONS: BE recurrence risk following CRIM remained constant over time, suggesting that lengthening of follow-up intervals, at least in the first 5 years after CRIM, may not be advisable. Sampling the GOJ is critical to detecting recurrence. The requirement for random biopsies of the neosquamous epithelium in the absence of visible lesions may need to be re-evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esófago de Barrett , Ablación por Catéter , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagoscopía , Medición de Riesgo , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/prevención & control , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevención & control , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaplasia/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Europe and the United States rapidly increased from the latter half of the 1970s and exceeded that of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the latter half of the 1990s, currently accounting for approximately 60% of all esophageal carcinomas. Recently, its incidence has also increased in Japan, raising concerns that it will follow a course similar to that in Europe and the United States. SUMMARY: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan was about 2% until the 1990s, but in recent years, it has risen to 6.5-7.1%. Causes include the increase in the incidence of obesity due to changes in eating habits with resultant increases in the incidence of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis, a decrease in the rate of Helicobacter pylori infection, and the increased interest of physicians in the gastroesophageal junction. The number of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients in Japan rapidly increased from the 1990s, which accordingly increased the number of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma patients from the latter half of the 1990s. Tabulation and analysis of 1,794 reported cases of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan showed that superficial cancers accounted for 77.6%, and that the concomitant rates of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis were high at 87 and 70% respectively. Key Message: The future trend in the incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan will depend on the increase in the incidence of reflux esophagitis, which is essential for the development of Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's esophageal carcinoma. The obesity rate is lower in Japan than that in Europe and the United States, and the incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis are low. We expect that the incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan will not rise as high as in Europe and the United States, and will remain below 10%.