Targeted sonogenetic modulation of GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampal CA1 region in status epilepticus.

Rationale: Sonogenetics is an advanced ultrasound-based neurostimulation approach for targeting neurons in specific brain regions. However, the role of sonogenetics in treating status epilepticus (SE) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of ultrasound neurostimulation and MscL-G22S (a mechanosensitive ion channel that mediates Ca2+ influx)-mediated sonogenetics (MG-SOG) in a mouse model of kainic acid (KA)-induced SE. Methods: For MG-SOG, a Cre-dependent AAV expressing MscL-G22S was injected into parvalbumin (PV)-cre and somatostatin (SST)-cre mice to induce the expression of MscL-G22S-EGFP in PV interneurons (PV-INs) and SST interneurons (SST-INs), respectively; mice were stimulated with continuous pulses of ultrasound stimulation during the latency of generalized seizures (GSs), the latency to SE, in SE model mice. We performed calcium fiber photometry, patch-clamp recording, local field potential recording, and SE monitoring to investigate the role of MG-SOG in treating SE. Results: First, we observed obvious neuronal activation in the hippocampal CA1 region in SE model mice. Both excitatory neurons (ENs) and GABAergic interneurons (GABA-INs) in the CA1 region were activated in SE model mice; however, the inhibitory effect of GABA-INs on ENs seemed to be insufficient to reduce EN excitability despite the increased activation of GABA-INs in SE model mice. Thus, we speculated that MG-SOG-induced activation of GABA-INs, mainly SST-INs and PV-INs, in the CA1 region may protect against SE. We found that MG-SOG-mediated PV-IN activation in the CA1 region ameliorated SE and changed SE-related electrophysiological abnormalities in the CA1 region; however, MG-SOG-induced SST-IN activation in the CA1 region did not ameliorate SE. Conclusions: MG-SOG-mediated activation of PV-INs had a positive effect on relieving SE. Our work may promote the development of sonogenetic neurostimulation techniques for treating SE.

Burden of status epilepticus: prognosis and cost driving factors, insight from a nationwide retrospective cohort study of the French health insurance database.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) imposes a significant burden in terms of in-hospital mortality and costs, but the relationship between SE causes, patient comorbidities, mortality, and cost remains insufficiently understood. We determined the in-hospital mortality and cost-driving factors of SE using a large and comprehensive database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients experiencing their first hospitalization with an ICD-10 code diagnosis of SE, spanning from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, using the French health insurance database which covers 99% of population. Patient characteristics, SE causes, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, mechanical ventilation, discharge status, and health insurance costs were extracted for each hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 52,487 patients hospitalized for a first SE. In-hospital mortality occurred in 11,464 patients (21.8%), with associated factors including age (Odds Ratio [OR], 10.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 7.87-13.8 for ages over 80 compared to 10-19), acute causes (OR, 15.3, 95% CI 13.9-16.8 for hypoxic cause), tumors (OR, 1.75, 95% CI 1.63-1.8), comorbidities (OR, 3.00, 95% CI 2.79-3.24 for 3 or more comorbidities compared to 0), and prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.61, 95% CI 2.42-2.82). The median reimbursed cost for each SE hospitalization was 6517€ (3364-13,354), with cost factors mirroring those of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Causes and co-morbidities are major determinants of mortality and hospital costs in status epilepticus, and factors associated with higher mortality are also often associated with higher costs. Further studies are needed to identify their long-term effects.

Clinical characteristics and treatment approach of established New-Onset status epilepticus (eNOSE): A Real-World multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Status Epilepticus (SE) can occur in patients without a previous epilepsy diagnosis, a condition identified as "new-onset status epilepticus" (NOSE). Treatment with benzodiazepine may fail in NOSE termination, requiring anti-seizure medication (ASM) employment. The term "established NOSE" (eNOSE) is generally employed in this context. This study aims to describe the main clinical characteristics of a large sample of patients suffering from eNOSE, compare the ASM efficacy, and explore the risk factors associated with ASM treatment unresponsiveness and eNOSE-associated mortality. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with eNOSE were retrospectively selected between January 2016 and December 2022. We reviewed demographics, clinical data, diagnostic work-up, and treatment. We considered the last ASM introduced before the eNOSE termination as effective. RESULTS: 123 patients were included (age: 67.9 ± 17.3). eNOSE acute etiology was mostly reported. In the overall cohort, phenytoin showed the highest response rate (p = 0.01). In the pairwise comparisons, valproate was superior to levetiracetam (p = 0.02) but not to lacosamide (p = 0.50). Phenytoin had a significantly higher resolution rate than levetiracetam (p = 0.001) but not lacosamide (p = 0.14). Thirty patients were refractory to ASM treatment. No predictors of refractoriness were identified. Thirty-nine patients died. Age and GCS were identified as eNOSE-related mortality risk factors. CONCLUSION: eNOSE frequently has an acute etiology with several associated syndromes. Phenytoin is more effective in managing eNOSE, even though lacosamide, valproate, and levetiracetam can represent further therapeutic options. Age and GCS are the main risk factors for eNOSE-associated mortality.

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective before-after study. SETTING: Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center. PATIENTS: Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Timely treatment of status epilepticus (SE) improves outcomes, however gaps between recommended and implemented care are common. This review analyzes obstacles and explores interventions to optimize effective, evidence-based treatment of SE. RECENT FINDINGS: Seizure action plans, rescue medications, and noninvasive wearables with seizure detection capabilities can facilitate early intervention for prolonged seizures in the home and school. In the field, standardized EMS protocols, EMS education, and screening tools can address variability in SE definitions and treatment, particularly benzodiazepine dosing. In the emergency room and hospital, provider education, SE order sets and alerts, and rapid EEG technologies, can shorten time to first-line therapy, second-line therapy, and EEG initiation. Widespread, sustained improvement in SE care remains challenging. A multipronged approach including emphasis on pre-hospital intervention, treatment protocols adapted to local contexts, and SE databases to systematically collect process and outcome metrics have the potential to transform SE treatment and outcomes.

Twelve landmarks in the treatment of status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus was a term which first appeared in the medical literature in 1824. In the 200 years that have passed since, treatment has undergone many changes. In this paper, 12 landmarks in the treatment of status epilepticus over this period are briefly described. This paper was presented at the 9th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures, in London in April 2024.

Status Epilepticus Identification and Treatment Among Emergency Medical Services Agencies.

This cross-sectional study examines the association between unidentified status epilepticus and prehospital benzodiazepine treatment.

Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option. ESSENTIAL POINTS: As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus management in patients with brain tumors. A cohort study.

PURPOSE: Status epilepticus (SE) represents a neurological emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. SE in patients with primary brain tumors received only limited attention to date; detailed analysis of treatment flow is lacking, especially as compared to other SE causes. This study aims to describe the frequency and treatment flow of tumor-related SE and compare it to other SE etiologies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study based on an institutional SE registry (SERCH) comprising adult SE (excluding post-anoxic causes), treated between January 2013 and December 2022, comparing SE management, frequency of refractory SE, and clinical outcome, among four patients' groups stratified by SE etiology: Non-neoplastic, Gliomas, Brain metastases, Other brain tumors. RESULTS: We analyzed 961 episodes in 831 patients (Non-neoplastic: 649, Gliomas: 85, Metastases: 77, Other brain tumors: 20). Although tumor-patients presented more often with focal episodes and less consciousness impairment than non-neoplastic patients, administration of benzodiazepines as first-line treatment (>75% across all groups), and utilization of second-line ASM were similar across groups. Treatment adequacy was marginally higher in glioma patients compared to the non-neoplastic population (p: 0.049), while refractory SE was comparable in all groups (p: 0.269). No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed (mortality: non-neoplastic (89/649, 13.7%), glioma (8/85, 9.4%), metastases (14/77, 18.2%), other tumors (5/20, 25.0%), p: 0.198; non-neoplastic vs. glioma, p: 0.271) CONCLUSION: Tumor-associated SE represents 1/5 of all SE episodes, and is managed similarly to other SE causes. Treatment responsiveness and short-term clinical outcomes also exhibit comparable results.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

The challenges of treating status epilepticus in rural Canada.

Though unified by challenges in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE), rural Canada is simultaneously massive and diverse, spanning the Pacific, Atlantic, and Arctic Oceans. According to the national statistical agency, the most rural jurisdiction in Canada is the Arctic territory of Nunavut. In particular, the Kivalliq region of Nunavut represents a unique epidemiologic SE space because any treatment beyond typical first-line lorazepam and second-line phenytoin by a non-neurologist locum tenens requires airborne evacuation over a thousand kilometers away to a single hospital with a single electroencephalographic (EEG) laboratory. This distinctive mode of healthcare delivery affords unique insights into the challenges of treating SE in rural Canada, such as lack of EEG infrastructure, a markedly high incidence of SE, the struggles of enduring cultural and socioeconomic trauma, and a relative lack of local epilepsy care as recommended by the World Health Organization. For example, despite empiric treatment and waiting over 2 days on average for EEG, 1 in 5 patients still had ongoing or possible electrographic seizures. At the same time, Kivalliq experiences routine dramatic changes in light-dark exposure each year to afford unique insights into circannual SE chronobiology in relation to the chief human zeitgeber of sunlight. This shows that challenges may also represent opportunities, such as for existing and emerging technologies to synergistically address enormous treatment gaps to improve SE care for the people of Kivalliq, while providing novel insights that may also help improve SE clinical care around the world.

Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in children and adolescents: A population-based study.

PURPOSE: Refractory (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are serious medical emergencies whose long-term outcomes depend on the timeliness of their management. Population-based clinical and epidemiological data on these conditions are sparse. We aimed to provide a detailed description of the epidemiology and clinical course of RSE and SRSE in children and adolescents and identify potential prognostic biomarkers. METHODS: In this retrospective population-based study, patients aged one month to 18 years who fulfilled the RSE/SRSE diagnostic criteria and were admitted to the intensive care unit of Haukeland University Hospital from 2012 to 2021 were considered eligible. Detailed clinical and laboratory findings along with information on management and outcomes were systematically analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with 52 episodes of RSE/SRSE were identified. The incidence rate was 3.13 per 100,000 per year. The median time from SE onset to the administration of the first rescue drug was 13 min, and from the first rescue drug to second- and third-line treatments, 83 and 66 min, respectively. All patients were alive at discharge. CONCLUSION: Delays in treatment were observed in various stages of the clinical course of RSE/SRSE. Improvement measures targeting the prompt administration of recuse mediation and subsequent treatment escalation are needed.

Outpatient management of prolonged seizures and seizure clusters to prevent progression to a higher-level emergency: Consensus recommendations of an expert working group.

OBJECTIVE: The management of prolonged seizures (PS) and seizure clusters (SC) is impeded by the lack of international, evidence-based guidance. We aimed to develop expert recommendations regarding consensus definitions of PS, SC, and treatment goals to prevent progression to higher-level emergencies such as status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: An expert working group, comprising 12 epileptologists, neurologists, and pharmacologists from Europe and North America, used a modified Delphi consensus methodology to develop and anonymously vote on statements. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "Agree"/"Strongly agree." RESULTS: All group members strongly agreed that termination of an ongoing seizure in as short a time as possible is the primary goal of rapid and early seizure termination (REST) and that an ideal medication for REST would start to act within 2 min of administration to terminate ongoing seizure activity. Consensus was reached on the terminology defining PS (with proposed thresholds of 5 min for prolonged focal seizures and 2 min for prolonged absence seizures and the convulsive phase of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) and SC (an abnormal increase in seizure frequency compared with the individual patient's usual seizure pattern). All group members strongly agreed or agreed that patients who have experienced a PS should be offered a REST medication, and all patients who have experienced a SC should be offered an acute cluster treatment (ACT). Further, when prescribing a REST medication or ACT, a seizure action plan should be agreed upon in consultation with the patient and caregiver. SIGNIFICANCE: The expert working group had a high level of agreement on the recommendations for defining and managing PS and SC. These recommendations will complement the existing guidance for the management of acute seizures, with the possibility of treating them earlier to potentially avoid progression to more severe seizures, including SE.

Electroconvulsive Therapy in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been suggested as a treatment option for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review was to conduct an extensive literature review on the role of ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus for journal articles from database inception until February 2024. Articles were then selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: We identified five retrospective case series with 28 adult patients receiving ECT for RSE or SRSE. ECT was administered within 3-70 days (mean 20 days) after the development of SE, and the mean number of ECT courses ranged from 1 to 12 sessions for each patient. ECT was administered in fixed or titrated doses. A total of 20 out of 28 patients (71%) showed clinical improvement, with two (7%) having complete cessation of seizures. It is essential to note that given the lack of control, there could be overreporting of clinical improvement in these studies. 11 patients (39%) were reported as deceased due to causes that were not directly related to ECT treatment. Four patients (14%) reported adverse effects of ECT, including memory, concentration, and/or cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: There are level-4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence and low-level Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Education evidence that suggest ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. In light of the limitations of the existing evidence, clinicians should carefully consider individual patients' clinical contexts when deciding on the appropriateness of ECT as a treatment option. Further research, including prospective studies with controlled designs, is needed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and optimal regime of ECT in the management of RSE and SRSE.

Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus (SE) is the second most common neurological emergency in adults. Despite improvements in the management of acute neurological conditions over the last decade, mortality is still durably high. Because a gap has emerged between SE management based on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and actual clinical practice, we conducted a systematic review of CPGs, assessing their quality, outlining commonalities and discrepancies in recommendations, and highlighting research gaps. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases and other gray literature sources (nine among guideline registries, evidence-based medicine databases, point-of-care tools; seven websites of governmental organizations and international neurologic societies) in December 2021 (updated in November 2023). The units of analysis were CPGs that included recommendations on the diagnostic and/or therapeutic management of SE in adults. The quality of the CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II tool. RESULTS: Fifteen CPGs were included. The "Applicability" domain was assigned the lowest median score of 10%. The domains "Stakeholder Involvement", "Rigor of Development," and "Editorial Independence" were as well generally underrated. Recommendations on general and diagnostic management and on organizational interventions were fragmented and scattered. Recommendations on pre-hospital and hospital treatment of early-onset and refractory SE were broadly agreed, whereas there was less agreement on the treatment model and medications for established SE and super-refractory SE. SIGNIFICANCE: The CPGs for the management of SE developed in recent years are flawed by several methodological issues and discrepancies in the coverage of important topics. The gap between CPG-based management of SE and actual clinical practice may be due in part to the inherent limitations of the CPGs produced so far.

Health care disparities in morbidity and mortality in adults with acute and remote status epilepticus: A national study.

OBJECTIVE: Although disparities have been described in epilepsy care, their contribution to status epilepticus (SE) and associated outcomes remains understudied. METHODS: We used the 2010-2019 National Inpatient Sample to identify SE hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)/ICD-10-CM codes. SE prevalence was stratified by demographics. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 486 861 SE hospitalizations (2010-2019), primarily at urban teaching hospitals (71.3%). SE prevalence per 10 000 admissions was 27.3 for non-Hispanic (NH)-Blacks, 16.1 for NH-Others, 15.8 for Hispanics, and 13.7 for NH-Whites (p < .01). SE prevalence was higher in the lowest (18.7) compared to highest income quartile (18.7 vs. 14, p < .01). Older age was associated with intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and in-hospital mortality. Those ≥80 years old had the highest odds of intubation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43-1.58), tracheostomy (OR = 2, 95% CI = 1.75-2.27), gastrostomy (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 2.97-3.83), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 6.51, 95% CI = 5.95-7.13). Minority populations (NH-Black, NH-Other, and Hispanic) had higher odds of tracheostomy and gastrostomy compared to NH-White populations. NH-Black people had the highest odds of tracheostomy (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.57-1.86) and gastrostomy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.65-1.92). The odds of receiving EEG monitoring rose progressively with higher income quartile (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34-1.62 for the highest income quartile) and was higher for those in urban teaching compared to rural hospitals (OR = 12.72, 95% CI = 8.92-18.14). Odds of mortality were lower (compared to NH-Whites) in NH-Blacks (OR = .71, 95% CI = .67-.75), Hispanics (OR = .82, 95% CI = .76-.89), and those in the highest income quartiles (OR = .9, 95% CI = .84-.97). SIGNIFICANCE: Disparities exist in SE prevalence, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy utilization across age, race/ethnicity, and income. Older age and lower income are also associated with mortality. Access to EEG monitoring is modulated by income and urban teaching hospital status. Older adults, racial/ethnic minorities, and populations of lower income or rural location may represent vulnerable populations meriting increased attention to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities.

Status epilepticus in Auckland, New Zealand: Treatment patterns and determinants of outcome in a prospective population-based cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Determination of the real-world performance of a health care system in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Prospective, multicenter population-based study of SE in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) over 1 year, with data recorded in the EpiNet database. Focus on treatment patterns and determinants of SE duration and 30-day mortality. The incidence, etiology, ethnic discrepancies, and seizure characteristics of this cohort have been published previously. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were included in this treatment cohort; 326 patients (89.3%) were brought to hospital because of SE, whereas 39 patients (10.7%) developed SE during a hospital admission for another reason. Overall, 190 (52.1%) had a known history of epilepsy and 254 (70.0%) presented with SE with prominent motor activity. The mean Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) was 2.15 and the mean SE duration of all patients was 44 min. SE self-terminated without any treatment in 84 patients (22.7%). Earlier administration of appropriately dosed benzodiazepine in the pre-hospital setting was a major determinant of SE duration. Univariate analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly higher in older patients, patients with longer durations of SE, higher STESS, and patients who developed SE in hospital, but these did not maintain significance with multivariate analysis. There was no difference in the performance of the health care system in the treatment of SE across ethnic groups. SIGNIFICANCE: When SE was defined as 10 continuous minutes of seizure, overall mortality was lower than expected and many patients had self-limited presentations for which no treatment was required. Although there were disparities in the incidence of SE across ethnic groups there was no difference in treatment or outcome. The finding highlights the benefit of a health care system designed to deliver universal health care.

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation desynchronizes refractory status epilepticus.

Recently, we showed that high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (hd-tDCS) can acutely reduce epileptic spike rates during and after stimulation in refractory status epilepticus (RSE), with a greater likelihood of patient discharge from the intensive care unit compared to historical controls. We investigate whether electroencephalographic (EEG) desynchronization during hd-tDCS can help account for observed anti-epileptic effects. Defining desynchronization as greater power in higher frequencies such as above 30 â€‹Hz ("gamma") and lesser power in frequency bands lower than 30 â€‹Hz, we analyzed 27 EEG sessions from 10 RSE patients who had received 20-minute session(s) of 2-milliamperes of transcranial direct current custom-targeted at the epileptic focus as previously determined by a clinical EEGer monitoring the EEG in real-time. During hd-tDCS, median relative power change over the EEG electrode chains in which power changes were maximal was +4.84%, -5.25%, -1.88%, -1.94%, and +4.99% for respective delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands in the bipolar longitudinal montage (p â€‹= â€‹0.0001); and +4.13%, -5.44%, -1.81%, -3.23%, and +5.41% in the referential Laplacian montage (p â€‹= â€‹0.0012). After hd-tDCS, median relative power changes reversed over the EEG electrode chains in which power changes were maximal: -2.74%, +4.20%, +1.74%, +1.75%, and -4.68% for the respective delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands in the bipolar longitudinal montage (p â€‹= â€‹0.0001); and +1.59%, +5.07%, +1.74%, +2.40%, and -5.12% in the referential Laplacian montage (p â€‹= â€‹0.0004). These findings are consistent with EEG desynchronization through theta-alpha-beta-gamma bands during hd-tDCS, helping account for the efficacy of hd-tDCS as an emerging novel anti-epileptic therapy against RSE.

Super-refractory status epilepticus, rhabdomyolysis, central hyperthermia and cardiomyopathy attributable to spinal anesthesia: a case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: There are only six past reports of super-refractory status epilepticus induced by spinal anesthesia. None of those patients have died. Only < 15 mg of bupivacaine was administered to all six of them and to our case. Pathophysiology ensuing such cases remains unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27 year old gravida 2, para 1, mother at 37 weeks of gestation came to the operating theater for an elective cesarean section. She had no significant medical history other than controlled hypothyroidism and one episode of food allergy. Her current pregnancy was uneventful. Her American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was 2. She underwent spinal anesthesia and adequate anesthesia was achieved. After 5-7 min she developed a progressive myoclonus. After delivery of a healthy baby, she developed generalized tonic clonic seizures that continued despite the induction of general anesthesia. She had rhabdomyolysis, one brief cardiac arrest and resuscitation, followed by stress cardiomyopathy and central hyperthermia. She died on day four. There were no significant macroscopic or histopathological changes in her brain that explain her super refractory status epilepticus. Heavy bupivacaine samples of the same batch used for this patient were analyzed by two specialized laboratories. National Medicines Quality Assurance Laboratory of Sri Lanka reported that samples failed to confirm United States Pharmacopeia (USP) dextrose specifications and passed other tests. Subsequently, Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia reported that the drug passed all standard USP quality tests applied to it. Nonetheless, they have detected an unidentified impurity in the medicine. CONCLUSIONS: After reviewing relevant literature, we believe that direct neurotoxicity by bupivacaine is the most probable cause of super-refractory status epilepticus. Super-refractory status epilepticus would have led to her other complications and death. We discuss probable patient factors that would have made her susceptible to neurotoxicity. The impurity in the drug detected by one laboratory also would have contributed to her status epilepticus. We propose several possible mechanisms that would have led to status epilepticus and her death. We discuss the factors that shall guide investigators on future such cases. We suggest ways to minimize similar future incidents. This is an idiosyncratic reaction as well.