Re-sternotomy in complex aortic surgery: careful individualized planning for a safe opening.

An increasing number of patients have required cardiac reoperations in recent decades, and this trend is expected to continue. Hence, re-sternotomy is and will be a common practice in high-volume centres. Re-sternotomy in complex aortic reinterventions carries a high risk of injuring major vascular and heart structures. To avoid catastrophic injuries, preoperative planning and case individualization are essential to minimize complications. Designing a safe and tailored strategy for each patient is believed to have an impact on postoperative outcomes. The arterial cannulation site, the need for hypothermia, left ventricle decompression and the use of an aortic occlusion balloon catheter are some of the preoperative decisions that must be made on a case-by-case basis to ensure adequate brain and visceral perfusion and to minimize major bleeding and circulatory interruption in case of re-entry injury.

[Postoperative sternomediastinitis: morphology of lesion, treatment strategy]. / Posleoperatsionnyi sternomediastinit: morfologiya porazheniya, taktika lecheniya.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze bone tissue damage at different stages of disease (El Oakley classification), treatment options for each clinical situation and results after each approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 45 patients with wound complications after cardiac surgery between October 2022 and September 2023. Thirty-eight (84.4%) patients underwent CABG, 7 (15.6%) patients - heart valve or aortic surgery. Mean age of patients was 68.1±10.3 years. There were 35 men (77.8%) and 10 women (22.2%). The first type was found in 11 (24.5%) patients, type 2-3 - 19 (42.2%), type 4 - 4 (8.8%), type 5 - 11 (24.5%) patients. RESULTS: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was observed in 7 (36.8%) persons of the 1st group, 14 (73.7%) ones of the 2nd group, 4 (100%) patients of the 3rd group and 2 (18.2%) patients of the 4th group. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin increased in all patients with the highest values in groups 2 and 3. Redo soft tissue inflammation occurred in all groups after treatment. Mean incidence was 25%. Two (10.5%) patients died in the 2nd group and 1 (25%) patient in the 3rd group. CONCLUSION: The modern classification of sternomediastinitis does not fully characterize severity of disease in a particular patient. Simultaneous debridement with wound closure demonstrates acceptable mortality (within 10%). The highest mortality rate was observed in patients with diffuse lesions of the sternum. Less aggressive treatment approaches are possible for stable anterior chest wall.

[Epicardial Pacemaker Infection Treated by Leads Removal via Re-sternotomy:Report of a Case].

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pacemaker infection after generator-exchange. Eight years ago, she underwent mitral and tricuspid valve replacement and had biventricular pacing with three pairs of epicardial leads placed in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle for left ventricular dysfunction. Skin perforation due to infection was detected 1 month after generator-exchange. At first, antibiotic treatment, generator-re-exchange, and pocket repositioning surgery were performed. Following all these failed attempts, a temporary pacemaker was placed, the infected generator was removed, and the lead was cut short. Eight days later, new intravenous caradiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation was performed. However, despite the repeat debridement, infection at the lead stumps recurred. Moreover, plain chest computed tomography (CT) revealed an abscess around the leads in the anterior mediastinum. Eventually, leads were removed under extracorporeal circulation via re-sternotomy. Postoperative course was uneventful, and she has been doing well without recurrence of infection for 6 years after operation.

Minimally Invasive Approach versus Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery in Jehovah's Witness Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) compared with the sternotomy approach for Jehovah's Witness (JW) patients who cannot receive blood transfusions DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a specialized cardiovascular intervention and surgery institute. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort comprised JW patients undergoing cardiac surgery between September 2016 and July 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients (n = 63) were divided into MICS (n = 19) and sternotomy (n = 44) groups, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. There was no difference in types of operation except coronary bypass grafting (n = 1 [5.3%] in the MICS group v n = 20 [45.5%] in the sternotomy group; p = 0.005). There were no between-group differences in early mortality and morbidities. Overall survival did not differ significantly during the follow-up period (mean, 43.9 ± 24.4 months). The amount of chest tube drainage was significantly lower in the MICS group on the first postoperative day (mean, 224.0 ± 122.7 mL v 334.0 ± 187.0 mL in the sternotomy group; p = 0.022). The mean hemoglobin level was significantly higher in the MICS group on the day of operation (11.7 ± 1.3 mg/dL v 10.6 ± 2.0 mg/dL in the sternotomy group; p = 0.042) and the first postoperative day (12.3 ± 1.8 mg/dL v 11.2 ± 1.9 mg/dL; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: MICS for JW patients showed favorable early outcomes and mid-term survival compared to conventional sternotomy. MICS may be a viable option for JW patients who decline blood transfusions.

Comparative efficacy of totally thoracoscopic, mini-thoracotomy, and mini-sternotomy approaches in aortic valve replacement.

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a critical procedure for patients with aortic valve diseases. This study compares the effectiveness of three minimally-invasive surgical approaches for AVR: totally thoracoscopic (TT), right anterior mini-thoracotomy, and upper mini-sternotomy. We analyzed retrospective data from 130 patients who underwent one of these surgeries, focusing on various factors such as duration of hospital stay, operation time, times for cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping, postoperative complications, levels of cardiac biomarkers, pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale, and mid-term survival rates. Results show that while the TT method had the longest operation times, it also had the shortest hospital stays and faster pain reduction post-surgery. Although the TT group initially showed higher cardiac biomarker levels after surgery, these levels normalized by the third day, similar to the other groups. There were no significant differences in mid-term survival and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates among the groups. These findings suggest that the TT method, despite longer surgical times, offers a quicker initial recovery, making it a viable option for AVR.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right anterior thoracotomy.

This study elucidates the efficacy and outcomes of a minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via a right anterior mini-thoracotomy, emphasizing its potential to minimize surgical trauma and expedite recovery while maintaining procedural integrity comparable to that of a traditional full sternotomy. This video tutorial demonstrates a successful aortic valve replacement procedure using the right anterior mini-thoracotomy approach, characterized by the absence of sutureless valves and specialized instruments. The detailed surgical procedure includes specific steps to optimize visibility and access through strategic incisions and rib dislocations, adhering to "the box principle" for effective exposure of the aortic valve. This video tutorial suggests that a right anterior mini-thoracotomy is a viable, cost-effective alternative to a conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement, offering significant patient benefits without compromising long-term valve function or safety. The broader implications for patient selection and surgical techniques highlight the need for meticulous preoperative planning and anatomical assessment to maximize the potential of a right anterior mini-thoracotomy in clinical practice.

Risk factors for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: A nested case-control study and time-to-event analysis.

Although potential risk factors for sternal wound infection (SWI) have been extensively studied, the onset time of SWI and different risk factors for superficial and deep SWI were rarely reported. This nested case-control study aims to compare the onset time and contributors between superficial and deep SWI. Consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery through median sternotomy in a single center from January 2011 to January 2021 constituted the cohort. The case group was those who developed SWI as defined by CDC and controls were matched 6:1 per case. Kaplan-Meier analysis, LASSO and univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed. A simple nomogram was established for clinical prediction of the risk of SWI. The incidence of SWI was 1.1% (61 out of 5471) in our cohort. Totally 366 controls were matched to 61 cases. 26.2% (16 of 61) SWI cases were deep SWI. The median onset time of SWI was 35 days. DSWI had a longer latency than SSWI (median time 46 days vs. 32 days, p = 0.032). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed different time-to-SWI between patients with and without DM (p = 0.0011) or MI (p = 0.0019). Multivariate Cox regression showed that BMI (HR = 1.083, 95% CI: 1.012-1.116, p = 0.022), DM (HR = 2.041, 95% CI: 1.094-3.805, p = 0.025) and MI (HR = 2.332, 95% CI: 1.193-4.557, p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for SWI. Superficial SWI was only associated with BMI (HR = 1.089, 95% CI: 1.01-1.175, p = 0.027), while deep SWI was associated with DM (HR = 3.271, 95% CI: 1.036-10.325, p = 0.043) and surgery time (HR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.001-1.008, p = 0.027). The nomogram for SWI prediction had an AUC of 0.67, good fitness and clinical effectiveness as shown by the calibration curve and decision curve analyses. BMI, DM and MI were independent risk factors for SWI. DSWI had a longer latency and different risk factors compared to SSWI. The nomogram showed a fair performance and good effectiveness for the clinical prediction of SWI.

Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for managing thymoma recurrence following sternotomy: a case report.

This report addresses the management strategy and effectiveness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for treating local recurrence of thymoma, a condition often complicated by severe adhesions and limited data on re-operation following median sternotomy. We report about a 43-year-old man with thymoma recurrence 4 years after thymothymectomy via a median sternotomy. Follow-up computed tomography revealed a nodule adjacent to the left brachiocephalic vein, indicating possible thymoma recurrence. Thus, re-operation was performed using a left-sided approach via RATS with an artificial pneumothorax. The manipulation space was secured with an artificial pneumothorax, and multidirectional manipulation using RATS demonstrated good efficacy. Collectively, this case highlights the efficacy of RATS as a viable approach for managing thymoma recurrence in mediastinal locations, particularly when sternotomy is complicated by severe adhesions.

Biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a prospective comparison to conventional surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery techniques are increasingly used but have longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, which may increase inflammatory response and negatively affect coagulation. Our aim was to compare biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation as well as transfusion rates after minimally invasive mitral valve repair and mitral valve surgery using conventional sternotomy. DESIGN: A prospective non-randomized study was performed enrolling 71 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (35 right mini-thoracotomy and 36 conventional sternotomy procedures). Blood samples were collected pre- and postoperatively to assess inflammatory response. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was performed to assess coagulation, and transfusion rates were monitored. RESULTS: The minimally invasive group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times compared to the sternotomy group: 127 min ([115-146] vs 79 min [65-112], p < 0.001) and were cooled to a lower temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass, 34 °C vs 36 °C (p = 0.04). IL-6 was lower in the minimally invasive group compared to the conventional sternotomy group when measured at the end of the surgical procedure, (38 [23-69] vs 61[41-139], p = 0.008), but no differences were found at postoperative day 1 or postoperative day 3. The transfusion rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (14%) compared to full sternotomy (35%, p = 0.04) and the chest tube output was reduced, (395 ml [190-705] vs 570 ml [400-1040], p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that despite the longer use of extra corporal circulation during surgery, minimally invasive mitral valve repair is associated with reduced inflammatory response, lower rates of transfusion, and reduced chest tube output.

Bleeding in minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown reduced perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing minimally invasive, compared with full sternotomy, aortic valve replacement. Data from randomized trials are conflicting. METHODS: This was a Swedish single center study where adult patients with aortic stenosis, 100 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either minimally invasive (ministernotomy) or full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. The primary outcome was severe or massive bleeding defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in adult cardiac surgery (UDPB). Secondary outcomes included blood product transfusions, chest tube output, re-exploration for bleeding, and several other clinically relevant events. RESULTS: Out of 100 patients, three patients randomized to ministernotomy were intraoperatively converted to full sternotomy (none was bleeding-related). Three patients (6%) in the full sternotomy group and 3 patients (6%) in the ministernotomy group suffered severe or massive postoperative bleeding according to the UDPB definition (p = 1.00). Mean chest tube output during the first 12 postoperative hours was 350 (standard deviation (SD) 220) ml in the full sternotomy group and 270 (SD 190) ml in the ministernotomy group (p = 0.08). 28% of patients in the full sternotomy group and 36% of patients in the ministernotomy group received at least one packed red blood cells transfusion (p = 0.39). Two patients in each group (4%) underwent re-exploration for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement did not result in less bleeding-related outcomes compared to full sternotomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT02272621.

Continuous Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Catheters for Poststernotomy Pain Control: A Case Series.

This case series describes the safety and effectiveness of superficial parasternal intercostal plane catheters for poststernotomy pain control in 4 patients who underwent multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients had reduced sternal pain and opioid consumption while the catheters ran continuously for 72 hours without complications. Our experience suggests the effectiveness of parasternal blocks can be safely prolonged with catheters, and they can be a useful addition to pain management strategies for this patient population.

Comparison of the Effects of Full Median Sternotomy vs. Mini-Incision on Postoperative Pain in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: It is not yet clear whether cardiac surgery by mini-incision (minimally invasive cardiac surgery [MICS]) is overall less painful than the conventional approach by full sternotomy (FS). A meta-analysis is necessary to investigate polled results on this topic. METHODS: PubMed®/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO) were searched for all clinical trials, reported until 2022, comparing FS with MICS in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve surgery (MVS), and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and postoperative pain outcome was analyzed. Main summary measures were the method of standardized mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-values (considered statistically significant when < 0.05). RESULTS: In AVR, the general estimate of postoperative pain effect favored MICS (SMD 0.87 [95% CI 0.04 to 1.71], P=0.04). However, in the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference between the groups (SMD 0.70 [95% CI -0.69 to 2.09], P=0.32). For MVS, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis with the included studies, because they had different methodologies. In CABG, the general estimate of the effect of postoperative pain did not favor any of the approaches (SMD -0.40 [95% CI -1.07 to 0.26], P=0.23), which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis (SMD -0.02 [95% CI -0.71 to 0.67], P=0.95). CONCLUSION: MICS was not globally less painful than the FS approach. It seems that postoperative pain is more related to the degree of tissue retraction than to the size of the incision.

Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models.

AIM: To compare the biomechanical properties of three different sternal closure techniques in a 3D-printed bone model of a sternum from a 30-kg dog. METHODS: Median sternotomy was performed on a total of 90 three-dimensional (3D) copies of a polycarbonate (PC) model of a sternum, generated from the CT images of the sternum of a 30-kg German Shepherd dog. Three different methods were used to repair the sternotomies: polydioxanone suture (group PDS, n = 30), stainless steel bone staples (group SS, n = 30), and nitinol bone staples (group NS, n = 30). Each repair method was tested by applying tensile force in one of three ways (longitudinally, laterally, or torsionally) resulting in a sample size of n = 10 for each repair method-loading combination. In all experiments, the loads at 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, failure, and the displacement at the failure point were measured. RESULTS: In lateral distraction and longitudinal shear tests, NS and SS staple repairs required application of significantly greater force than PDS across all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm). NS exhibited significantly greater failure load than PDS. In torsion tests, NS required significantly greater application of force compared to SS or PDS at all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm) and exhibited a greater failure load than PDS. In terms of displacement at failure point, PDS suture showed more displacement than SS or NS across all experiments (laterally, longitudinally, torsionally). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, bone staples were mechanically superior to PDS suture in median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone model in terms of 1-mm, 2-mm displacement loads, and displacement at failure. NS had a higher failure load than PDS under lateral, longitudinal, and torsional distraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These study results imply that bone staples can be considered as an alternative surgical method for median sternotomy closure in dogs.

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management for sternal infection after midline sternotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after midline sternotomy of cardiac surgery is a challenging complication that affects the outcome of surgery. This study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of the antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management in the treatment of DSWI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5 patients with DSWI who underwent antibiotic-loaded bone cement combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps for chest wall reconstruction after sternotomy for cardiac surgery in a tertiary hospital in China from January 2020 to December 2021. The clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All patients had no perioperative mortalities, no postoperative complications, 100% wound healing, and an average hospital stay length of 24 days. The follow-up periods were from 6 to 35 months (mean 19.6 months). None of the cases showed wound problems after initial reconstruction using antibiotic-loaded bone cement combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps. CONCLUSIONS: We report our successful treatment of DSWI, using antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management. The clinical and follow-up results are favorable.

Outcomes and Risk Factors Associated with Pericardiectomy in Patients with Constrictive Pericarditis: A Retrospective Study from China.

PURPOSE: Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment option for constrictive pericarditis and is associated with a high prevalence of morbidity and mortality. However, information on the associated outcomes and risk factors is limited. We aimed to report the mid-term outcomes of pericardiectomy from a single center in China. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent pericardiectomy at our institute from April 2018 to January 2023. RESULTS: Eighty-six consecutive patients (average age, 46.1 ± 14.7 years; 68.6 men) underwent pericardiectomy through midline sternotomy. The most common etiology was idiopathic (n = 60, 69.8%), and 82 patients (95.3%) were in the New York Heart Association function class III/IV. In all, 32 (37.2%) patients underwent redo sternotomies, 36 (41.9%) underwent a concomitant procedure, and 39 (45.3%) required cardiopulmonary bypass. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8%, and the 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 88.3% and 83.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative mitral insufficiency (MI) ≥moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 6.435; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.655-25.009]; p = 0.007) and partial pericardiectomy (HR, 11.410; 95% CI [3.052-42.663]; p = 0.000) were associated with increased 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Pericardiectomy remains a safe operation for constrictive pericarditis with optimal mid-term outcomes.

The Results of Minimally Invasive Implantation of the HeartMate 3 LVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of minimally invasive HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation. METHODOLOGY: Forty-seven patients who underwent the HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation by sternotomy and 26 ones who had implantation via minimally invasive method were analyzed. The observation lasted from November 2016 to May 2020. RESULTS: ECMO as a bridge to LVAD, was more usual in the sternotomy group (11% vs 0%, P = .03). In the minimally invasive group, a history of previous cardiac surgery was more common (54% vs 12%, P < .001), this was the main indication for a minimally invasive approach in our institution. Patients undergoing a minimally invasive implantation had a significantly longer duration of surgery (Med. = 367.5 min vs Med. = 265.0 minutes, P < .001), and significantly higher intraoperative use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates (PCs). There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative bleedings requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative wound infections were observed significantly more often in the sternotomy group (6% vs 0.0%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between groups in the first 180 days after surgery. A slightly lower percentage of patients reached 2-year postsurgery survival in the group undergoing sternotomy, but this finding was not statistically significant. The mean survival time among sternotomy patients was 430.0 days (+/- 291.77 days) vs 633.15 days (+/- 426.84) in minimally invasive group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive implantation of the HeartMate 3 LVAD may be an alternative method of LVAD implantation in a selected group of patients.

Simulation Training for Emergency Sternotomy in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Emergency resternotomy in the intensive care unit for a patient who has undergone cardiac surgery can be daunting for surgeons and critical care staff. Clinicians involved are often unfamiliar with the surgical instruments and techniques needed. LOCAL PROBLEM: After an emergency intensive care unit resternotomy resulted in suboptimal performance and outcome, protocols for emergency resternotomy were established and improved. METHODS: Education and simulation training were used to improve staff comfort and familiarity with the needed techniques and supplies. The training intervention included simulations to provide hands-on experience, improve staff familiarity with resternotomy trays, and streamline emergency sternotomy protocols. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess participants' familiarity with the implemented plans and algorithms. RESULTS: All 44 participants (100%) completed the preintervention survey, and 41 of 44 participants (93%) returned the postintervention survey. After the intervention, 95% of respondents agreed that they were prepared to be members of the team for an emergency intensive care unit sternotomy, compared with 52% of respondents before the intervention. After the intervention, 95% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that they could identify patients who might need emergency sternotomy, compared with 50% before the intervention. The results also showed improvement in staff members' understanding of team roles, activation and use of the emergency sternotomy protocol, and differences between guidelines for resuscitating patients who experience cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery and the post-cardiac arrest Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support protocol. CONCLUSION: Results of this quality improvement project suggest that simulation training improves staff comfort with and understanding of emergency resternotomy.

[Mitral valve surgery via minimally invasive and conventional access]. / Mitral'naya khirurgiya iz mini- i traditsionnogo dostupov.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate results of mini-thoracotomy and sternotomy in patients with mitral valve disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 52 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery (25 cases - mini-thoracotomy, 27 cases - sternotomy). RESULTS: Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly longer in sternotomy compared to mini-thoracotomy group - 110 vs 94 min (p=0.03). Ventilation time was also significantly longer in the sternotomy group (12 vs. 8 hours, p=0.01). Postoperative morbidity was similar (postoperative wound infection, neurological complications, coronavirus disease, overall in-hospital mortality). CONCLUSION: In addition to cosmetic effect, minimally invasive approach in mitral valve surgery has some other advantages including less duration of aortic cross-clamping and mechanical ventilation, availability of reconstructive interventions due to better exposition of the mitral valve and subvalvular structures.

Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Right Anterior Thoracotomy vs. Median Full Sternotomy in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the early postoperative outcomes of right anterior thoracotomy minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (RAT-MIAVR) surgery with those of median full sternotomy aortic valve replacement (MFS-AVR) approach with the goal of identifying potential benefits or drawbacks of each technique. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, cohort study included 476 patients who underwent RAT-MIAVR or MFS-AVR in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2023. Of these, 107 patients (22.5%) underwent RAT-MIAVR, and 369 patients (77.5%) underwent MFS-AVR. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, resulting in 95 patients per group for analysis. RESULTS: After propensity matching, two groups were comparable in preoperative characteristics. RAT-MIAVR group showed longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (130.24 ± 31.15 vs. 117.75 ± 36.29 minutes, P=0.012), aortic cross-clamping time (76.44 ± 18.00 vs. 68.49 ± 19.64 minutes, P=0.004), and longer operative time than MFS-AVR group (358.47 ± 67.11 minutes vs. 322.42 ± 63.84 minutes, P=0.000). RAT-MIAVR was associated with decreased hospitalization time after surgery, lower postoperative blood loss and drainage fluid, a reduced incidence of mediastinitis, increased left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower pacemaker use compared to MFS-AVR. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major complications and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RAT-MIAVR is a feasible and safe alternative procedure to MFS-AVR, with comparable in-hospital mortality and early follow-up. This minimally invasive approach may be a suitable option for patients requiring isolated aortic valve replacement.