Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Ontario, bariatric surgery is publicly funded and is performed only in accredited tertiary care hospitals. The purpose of our study was to report on the safety and outcomes of performing bariatric surgery at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital in southern Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult (age ≥ 18 yr) patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the ambulatory site of our tertiary care hospital between September 2016 and August 2018. The 2 sites are 1.4 km apart. Patient demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, intraoperative and 90-day postoperative complications, number of transfers and readmission to the tertiary care hospital, and emergency department visits were collected. RESULTS: A total of 314 patients (285 women [90.8%] and 29 men [9.2%] with a mean age of 41.8 yr [standard deviation (SD) 8.9 yr]) underwent surgery: LRYGB in 295 cases (93.9%) and LSG in 19 (6.0%). The mean body mass index was 45.3 (SD 5.1), the median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 (range 2-4), and the median Edmonton Obesity Staging System score was 2 (range 0-4). The mean operative time was 119.8 (SD 23.1) minutes for LRYGB and 96.2 (SD 22.0) minutes for LSG, and the mean length of stay was 2.1 (SD 0.6) days and 2.1 (SD 0.2) days, respectively. Thirteen patients (4.1%) required transfer to the tertiary care hospital for a postoperative complication. Of 312 patients, 29 (9.3%) presented to emergency department within 90 days after surgery, and 8 (2.6%) required readmission to hospital; no deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that LRYGB and LSG can be performed safely at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital. However, caution should be exercised in performing these procedures at an ambulatory site without a tertiary care hospital affiliation, as patients may require urgent transfer for a serious postoperative complication.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Ontario/epidemiología , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are the main forms of treatment for acute respiratory failure. This study aimed to evaluate the effect, safety, and applicability of the NIV and HFNC in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) caused by COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we monitored the effect of NIV and HFNC on the SpO2 and respiratory rate before, during, and after treatment, length of stay, rates of endotracheal intubation, and mortality in patients with AHRF caused by COVID-19. Additionally, data regarding RT-PCR from physiotherapists who were directly involved in assisting COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19. RESULTS: 62.2 % of patients were treated with HFNC. ROX index increased during and after NIV and HFNC treatment (P < 0.05). SpO2 increased during NIV treatment (P < 0.05), but was not maintained after treatment (P = 0.17). In addition, there was no difference in the respiratory rate during or after the NIV (P = 0.95) or HFNC (P = 0.60) treatment. The mortality rate was 35.7 % for NIV vs 21.4 % for HFNC (P = 0.45), while the total endotracheal intubation rate was 57.1 % for NIV vs 69.6 % for HFNC (P = 0.49). Two adverse events occurred during treatment with NIV and eight occurred during treatment with HFNC. There was no difference in the physiotherapists who tested positive for SARS-COV-2 directly involved in assisting COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 ones (P = 0.81). CONCLUSION: The application of NIV and HFNC in the critical care unit is feasible and associated with favorable outcomes. In addition, there was no increase in the infection of physiotherapists with SARS-CoV-2.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Cánula , Intubación Intratraqueal , Ventilación no Invasiva , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Frecuencia Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , Cánula/efectos adversos , Cánula/normas , Cánula/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación no Invasiva/efectos adversos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Ventilación no Invasiva/normas , Ventilación no Invasiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/normas , Respiración con Presión Positiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The extent of resection required in advanced gallbladder cancer is controversial. We aimed to describe the management and outcomes in patients with resected stage T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, all T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer cases from Jan. 1, 2002, to Mar. 31, 2012, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry; pathology reports were linked and abstracted. The type of resection was classified as extended (cholecystectomy + liver resection, with or without bile duct resection) or simple (cholecystectomy only). We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to model time to death and evaluated factors associated with overall survival using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were included, 232 with T2 disease and 138 with T3 disease. The proportions who underwent extended resection were 24.1% (56/232) and 37.0% (51/138), respectively. The unadjusted 5-year overall survival rates for simple and extended resection were 39.7% and 49.5%, respectively, for T2 disease (p = 0.03), and 13.5% and 22.8%, respectively, for T3 disease (p = 0.05). In adjusted analysis, extended resection significantly improved overall survival among patients with T2 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.97), whereas higher grade of differentiation, presence of lymphovascular invasion and positive lymph nodes led to worse survival. Extended resection was not associated with improved survival in the T3 group; however, in subgroup analysis stratified by lymph node status, a trend toward improved overall survival with extended resection was seen in node-negative patients (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.06). CONCLUSION: Extended resection improved overall survival in T2 disease regardless of nodal status but appeared most beneficial in node-negative T3 disease. The finding that extended resection was offered only to a small proportion of eligible patients highlights the need for improved knowledge translation at national surgical meetings.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ontario , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interbody devices have revolutionized lumbar spinal fusion surgery by improving mechanical stability and maximizing fusion potential. Several approaches for interbody fusion exist with two of the most common being anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). This study aims to compare patient data, hospital outcomes, and post-operative complications between an anterior vs. posterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD10) codes to identify patients (18 +) from 2016 to 2018 who underwent lumbar interbody fusion under an anterior or posterior approach. Patients missing identifiers were excluded from this study. Patients were further investigated by demographic data and the presence of comorbidities. Hospital outcome data was investigated by length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, mortality, and post-operative complications. RESULTS: 373,585 patients were included in this study. 257,975 (69%) underwent fusion via a posterior approach, and 115,610 (31%) via an anterior approach. Patients undergoing posterior approach were found to have a greater number of comorbidities than anterior (3.5 vs. 2, respectively, p = <0.001). The posterior approach was associated with decreased LOS (3.59 vs 4.19 days, p = <0.0001) and decreased total hospital charges ($141,700 vs $211,015, p = <0.0001). A posterior approach was found to have lower rates of post-operative complications. For the anterior approach cohort, tobacco dependence (OR=1.31 [1.20-1.42, p = <0.001], diabetes (OR=2.41 [2.33-2.49, p = <0.001], and osteoporosis (OR=1.42 [1.30-1.54, p = <0.001] were found to be significant independent predictors of post-operative pseudoarthrosis. Obesity (OR=1.28 [1.14-1.42, p = <0.001], tobacco dependence (OR=1.48 [1.40-1.56, p = <0.001], diabetes (OR=2.21 [2.10-2.32, p = <0.001], congestive heart failure (OR=1.20 [1.01-1.39, p = 0.04], and osteoporosis (OR=1.65 [1.55-1.75, p = <0.001], were found to be independent predictors of post-operative pseudoarthrosis in the posterior cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent the anterior approach suffered from increased hospital charges, length of stay, and increased risk of post-operative complications including mortality, wound dehiscence, hematoma/seroma, and pseudoarthrosis. Comorbid disease plays a significant role in the outcome of successful fusion with variable effect depending on the surgical approach. Increasing due diligence in patient selection should be considered when choosing an approach in pre-operative planning.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine critical care continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) utilization and downstream anti-seizure treatment patterns, their association with outcomes, and generate hypotheses for larger comparative effectiveness studies of cEEG-guided interventions. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of critically ill patients (n = 14,523, age ≥18 years). Exposure defined as ≥24 h of cEEG and subsequent anti-seizure medication (ASM) escalation, with or without concomitant anesthetic. Exposure window was the first 7 days of admission. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed using penalized logistic regression. RESULTS: One thousand and seventy-three patients underwent ≥24 h of cEEG within 7 days of admission. After adjusting for disease severity, ≥24 h of cEEG followed by ASM escalation in patients not on anesthetics (n = 239) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.76 [0.53-1.07]), though the finding did not reach significance. ASM escalation with concomitant anesthetic use (n = 484) showed higher odds for mortality (OR 1.41 [1.03-1.94]). In the seizures/status epilepticus subgroup, post cEEG ASM escalation without anesthetics showed lower odds for mortality (OR 0.43 [0.23-0.74]). Within the same subgroup, ASM escalation with concomitant anesthetic use showed higher odds for mortality (OR 1.34 [0.92-1.91]) though not significant. INTERPRETATION: Based on our findings we propose the following hypotheses for larger comparative effectiveness studies investigating the direct causal effect of cEEG-guided treatment on outcomes: (1) cEEG-guided ASM escalation may improve outcomes in critically ill patients with seizures; (2) cEEG-guided treatment with combination of ASMs and anesthetics may not improve outcomes in all critically ill patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Electroencefalografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Convulsiones , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Background. Due to an increasing stroke incidence, a lack of resources to implement effective rehabilitation and a significant proportion of patients with remaining impairments after treatment, there is a rise in demand for effective and prolonged rehabilitation. Development of self-rehabilitation programs provides an opportunity to meet these increasing demands.Objective. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of self-rehabilitation on motor outcomes, in comparison to conventional rehabilitation, among patients with stroke. The secondary aim was to assess the influence of trial location (continent), technology, time since stroke (acute/subacute vs chronic), dose (total training duration > vs ≤ 15 hours), and intervention design (self-rehabilitation in addition/substitution to conventional therapy) on effect of self-rehabilitation.Methods. Studies were selected if participants were adults with stroke; the intervention consisted of a self-rehabilitation program defined as a tailored program where for most of the time, the patient performed rehabilitation exercises independently; the control group received conventional therapy; outcomes included motor function and activity; and the study was a randomized controlled trial with a PEDro score ≥5.Results. Thirty-five trials were selected (2225 participants) and included in quantitative synthesis regarding motor outcomes. Trials had a median PEDro Score of 7 [6-8]. Self-rehabilitation programs were shown to be as effective as conventional therapy. Trial location, use of technology, stroke stage, and intervention design did not appear to have a significant influence on outcomes.Conclusion. This meta-analysis showed low to moderate evidence that self-rehabilitation and conventional therapy efficacy was equally valuable for post-stroke motor function and activity.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Actividad Motora , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Automanejo , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Depression frequently recurs. To prevent relapse, antidepressant medication is often taken in the long term. Sequentially delivering a psychological intervention while undergoing tapering of antidepressant medication might be an alternative to long-term antidepressant use. However, evidence is lacking on which patients may benefit from tapering antidepressant medication while receiving a psychological intervention and which should continue the antidepressant therapy. A meta-analysis of individual patient data with more power and precision than individual randomized clinical trials or a standard meta-analysis is warranted. Objectives: To compare the associations between use of a psychological intervention during and/or after antidepressant tapering vs antidepressant use alone on the risk of relapse of depression and estimate associations of individual clinical factors with relapse. Data Sources: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PsycInfo were last searched on January 23, 2021. Requests for individual participant data from included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were sent. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that compared use of a psychological intervention while tapering antidepressant medication with antidepressant monotherapy were included. Patients had to be in full or partial remission from depression. Two independent assessors conducted screening and study selection. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Of 15â¯792 screened studies, 236 full-text articles were retrieved, and 4 RCTs that provided individual participant data were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to relapse and relapse status over 15 months measured via a blinded assessor using a diagnostic clinical interview. Results: Individual data from 714 participants (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [11.5] years; 522 [73.1%] female) from 4 RCTs that compared preventive cognitive therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy during and/or after antidepressant tapering vs antidepressant monotherapy were available. Two-stage random-effects meta-analysis found no significant difference in time to depressive relapse between use of a psychological intervention during tapering of antidepressant medication vs antidepressant therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60-1.23). Younger age at onset (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), shorter duration of remission (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00), and higher levels of residual depressive symptoms at baseline (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10) were associated with a higher overall risk of relapse. None of the included moderators were associated with risk of relapse. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this individual participant data meta-analysis suggest that regardless of the clinical factors included in these studies, the sequential delivery of a psychological intervention during and/or after tapering may be an effective relapse prevention strategy instead of long-term use of antidepressants. These results could be used to inform shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
About a year into the pandemic, COVID-19 accumulates more than two million deaths worldwide. Despite non-pharmaceutical interventions such as social distance, mask-wearing, and restrictive lockdown, the daily confirmed cases remain growing. Vaccine developments from Pfizer, Moderna, and Gamaleya Institute reach more than 90% efficacy and sustain the vaccination campaigns in multiple countries. However, natural and vaccine-induced immunity responses remain poorly understood. There are great expectations, but the new SARS-CoV-2 variants demand to inquire if the vaccines will be highly protective or induce permanent immunity. Further, in the first quarter of 2021, vaccine supply is scarce. Consequently, some countries that are applying the Pfizer vaccine will delay its second required dose. Likewise, logistic supply, economic and political implications impose a set of grand challenges to develop vaccination policies. Therefore, health decision-makers require tools to evaluate hypothetical scenarios and evaluate admissible responses. Following some of the WHO-SAGE recommendations, we formulate an optimal control problem with mixed constraints to describe vaccination schedules. Our solution identifies vaccination policies that minimize the burden of COVID-19 quantified by the number of disability-adjusted years of life lost. These optimal policies ensure the vaccination coverage of a prescribed population fraction in a given time horizon and preserve hospitalization occupancy below a risk level. We explore "via simulation" plausible scenarios regarding efficacy, coverage, vaccine-induced, and natural immunity. Our simulations suggest that response regarding vaccine-induced immunity and reinfection periods would play a dominant role in mitigating COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/farmacología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva , Modelos Teóricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Vacunación Masiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación Masiva/normas , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare costs have substantially increased in recent years, threatening the population health. Obstetric care is a significant contributor to this scenario since it represents 20% of healthcare. The rate of cesarean sections (C-sections) has escalated worldwide. Evidence shows that cesarean delivery is not only more expensive, but it is also linked to poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study assesses which type of delivery is associated with a higher healthcare value in low-risk pregnancies. RESULTS: A total of 9345 deliveries were analyzed. The C-section group had significantly worse rates of breastfeeding in the first hour after delivery (92.57% vs 88.43%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of intensive unit care (ICU) admission both for the mother and the newborn (0.8% vs 0.3%, p = 0.001; 6.7% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0078 respectively), and a higher average cost of hospitalization (BRL14,342.04 vs BRL12,230.03 considering mothers and babies). CONCLUSION: Cesarean deliveries in low-risk pregnancies were associated with a lower value delivery because in addition to being more expensive, they had worse perinatal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/economía , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Through participation in payment reforms such as bundled payment and accountable care organizations (ACOs), hospitals are increasingly financially responsible for health care use and adverse health events occurring after hospital discharge. To improve management and coordination of postdischarge care, ACO hospitals are establishing a closer relationship with skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) through the formation of preferred SNF networks. RESEARCH DESIGN: We evaluated the effects of preferred SNF network formation on care patterns and outcomes. We included 10 ACOs that established preferred SNF networks between 2014 and 2015 in the sample. We first investigated whether hospitals "steer" patients to preferred SNFs by examining the percentage of patients sent to preferred SNFs within each hospital before and after network formation. We then used a difference-in-difference model with SNF fixed effects to evaluate the changes in patient composition and outcomes of preferred SNF patients from ACO hospitals after network formation relative to patients from other hospitals. RESULTS: We found that preferred network formation was not associated with higher market share or better outcomes for preferred SNF patients from ACO hospitals. However, we found a small increase in the average number of Elixhauser comorbidities for patients from ACO hospitals after network formation, relative to patients from non-ACO hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: After preferred SNF network formation, there is some evidence that ACO hospitals sent more complex patients to preferred SNFs, but there was no change in the volume of patients received by these SNFs. Furthermore, preferred network formation was not associated with improvement in patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/organización & administración , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/organización & administración , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Comorbilidad , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Humanos , Medicare , Multimorbilidad , Grupos Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The hyperacute care of ischemic stroke has evolved markedly. It is unclear to which level stroke centre patients should primarily be taken so information of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) outcomes in smaller centres are needed. METHODS: All IVT episodes in North Karelia Central hospital in 2016-2017 were analysed retrospectively using hospital registries and individual medical records. RESULTS: IVT had been given to 75 patients (47% women) whose median age was 74 years [IQR 64, 81; no gender difference (p = 0.70)]. Median NIHSS on admission was 6 (IQR 4, 10) and onset-to-treatment time (OTT) 125 min (95% CI 112-138 min). Two intracranial bleeding complications were observed. Clinical status improved following IVT and 53.4% were independent at six months (85% were independent before the stroke). In a multivariate analysis the NIHSS score was the only predictor (B = 0.12, R2=0.34, p = 0.0001) of modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) was identified in 27% (35% women). Their median mRS was 2.0 (25% had died). Endovascular thrombectomy had followed IVT in 30% of the LVO-patients. CONCLUSIONS: IVT results were generally in this peripheral PSC-level hospital without advanced imaging capabilities, but LVO outcomes need improvement. A mothership strategy should be evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Hospitales Especializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vías Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing traditional single and multilevel sleep surgery to those undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS). STUDY DESIGN: Case control study comparing retrospective cohort of patients undergoing traditional sleep surgery to patients undergoing UAS enrolled in the ADHERE registry. SETTING: 8 multinational academic medical centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 233 patients undergoing prior single or multilevel traditional sleep surgery and meeting study inclusion criteria were compared to 465 patients from the ADHERE registry who underwent UAS. We compared preoperative and postoperative demographic, quality of life, and polysomnographic data. We also evaluated treatment response rates. RESULTS: The pre and postoperative apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 33.5 and 15 in the traditional sleep surgery group and 32 and 10 in the UAS group. The postoperative AHI in the UAS group was significantly lower. The pre and postoperative Epworth sleepiness scores (ESS) were 12 and 6 in both the traditional sleep surgery and UAS groups. Subgroup analysis evaluated those patients undergoing single level palate and multilevel palate and tongue base traditional sleep surgeries. The UAS group had a significantly lower postoperive AHI than both traditional sleep surgery subgroups. The UAS group had a higher percentage of patients reaching surgical success, defined as a postoperative AHI <20 with a 50% reduction from preoperative severity. CONCLUSION: UAS offers significantly better control of AHI severity than traditional sleep surgery. Quality life improvements were similar between groups.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hueso Paladar/cirugía , Polisomnografía/métodos , Polisomnografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Lengua/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following liver transplantation (LT) negatively impacts graft and patient outcomes. Previously we reported that the liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT7) risk score was superior to binary EAD or the model for early allograft function (MEAF) score for estimating 3-month graft failure-free survival in a single-center derivation cohort. Herein, we sought to externally validate L-GrAFT7, and compare its prognostic performance to EAD and MEAF. METHODS: Accuracies of L-GrAFT7, EAD, and MEAF were compared in a 3-center US validation cohort (n = 3,201), and a Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe (COPE) normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) trial cohort (n = 222); characteristics were compared to assess generalizability. RESULTS: Compared to the derivation cohort, patients in the validation and NMP trial cohort had lower recipient median MELD scores; were less likely to require pretransplant hospitalization, renal replacement therapy or mechanical ventilation; and had superior 1-year overall (90% and 95% vs. 84%) and graft failure-free (88% and 93% vs. 81%) survival, with a lower incidence of 3-month graft failure (7.4% and 4.0% vs. 11.1%; p <0.001 for all comparisons). Despite significant differences in cohort characteristics, L-GrAFT7 maintained an excellent validation AUROC of 0.78, significantly superior to binary EAD (AUROC 0.68, p = 0.001) and MEAF scores (AUROC 0.72, p <0.001). In post hoc analysis of the COPE NMP trial, the highest tertile of L-GrAFT7 was significantly associated with time to liver allograft (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, p = 0.016), Clavien ≥IIIB (HR 2.60, p = 0.034) and ≥IVa (HR 4.99, p = 0.011) complications; post-LT length of hospitalization (p = 0.002); and renal replacement therapy (odds ratio 3.62, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: We have validated the L-GrAFT7 risk score as a generalizable, highly accurate, individualized risk assessment of 3-month liver allograft failure that is superior to existing scores. L-GrAFT7 may standardize grading of early hepatic allograft function and serve as a clinical endpoint in translational studies (www.lgraft.com). LAY SUMMARY: Early allograft dysfunction negatively affects outcomes following liver transplantation. In independent multicenter US and European cohorts totaling 3,423 patients undergoing liver transplantation, the liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT) risk score is validated as a superior measure of early allograft function that accurately discriminates 3-month graft failure-free survival and post-liver transplantation complications.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto , Medición de Riesgo , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnóstico , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/epidemiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/terapia , Pronóstico , Daño por Reperfusión/diagnóstico , Daño por Reperfusión/epidemiología , Daño por Reperfusión/terapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is mainly used to diagnose acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, cTn can also be elevated in critically ill patients secondary to demand ischemia or myocardial injury. The impact of cardiology consultation on the clinical outcomes of patients admitted to medical intensive care unit (ICU) with elevated cTn is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical ICU patients with elevated cTn without evidence of ACS between January 2013 through December 2018. Patients were stratified based on documentation of cardiology consultation. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality, the length of stay (LOS), further cardiac testing, 30-day readmission rate, new prescription of cardiac medications, and the predictors of a cardiology consultation. RESULTS: Of 846 patients screened, 766 patients were included, of whom 63.2% had cardiology consultation. Cardiology consultation group had longer median LOS (7 vs. 5 days, P = 0.007), additional cardiac testing (90.3% vs. 67.7%, P < 0.001), and more new cardiac medications (52.1% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.001). No difference was noted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.6, 95% CI, 0.4-1.1, P = .117), 30-day mortality (aOR = 0.8, 95% CI, 0.5-1.4, P = .425), 1- year mortality (aOR, 1.4, 95% CI, 0.9-2.2, P = .193), or cardiac-specific 30-day readmission rate (aOR, 7.0, 95% CI, 0.7-14.9, P = .137). History of coronary artery disease (CAD) was the most independent predictor for a cardiology consult (aOR, 2.2, 95% CI, 1.3-3.8, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Cardiology consultation for elevated cTn in medical ICU patients was associated with increased cardiac testing and LOS, without significant impact on mortality.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Troponina/metabolismo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/metabolismo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cardiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebraska , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19 , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Carga Viral/métodos , Proteínas Virales/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of benzodiazepines and the association between low benzodiazepine dose, breakthrough seizures, and respiratory support in patients with status epilepticus. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of adult patients with status epilepticus treated by an emergency medical services agency from 2013 to 2018, the primary outcome was treatment with a second benzodiazepine dose, an indicator for breakthrough seizure. The secondary outcome was receiving respiratory support. Midazolam was the only benzodiazepine administered. RESULTS: Among 2,494 patients with status epilepticus, mean age was 54.0 years and 1,146 (46%) were female. There were 1,537 patients given midazolam at any dose, yielding an administration rate of 62%. No patients received a dose and route consistent with national guidelines. Rescue therapy with a second midazolam dose was required in 282 (18%) patients. Higher midazolam doses were associated with lower odds of rescue therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-0.9) and were not associated with increased respiratory support. If anything, higher doses of midazolam were associated with decreased need for respiratory support after adjustment (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: An overwhelming majority of patients with status epilepticus did not receive evidence-based benzodiazepine treatment. Higher midazolam doses were associated with reduced use of rescue therapy and there was no evidence of respiratory harm, suggesting that benzodiazepines are withheld without clinical benefit. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with status epilepticus, higher doses of midazolam led to a reduced use of rescue therapy without an increased need for ventilatory support.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Respiración Artificial , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Decisions about dialysis for advanced kidney disease are often strongly shaped by sociocultural and system-level factors rather than the priorities and values of individual patients. We examined international variation in the uptake of conservative approaches to the care of patients with advanced kidney disease, in particular discontinuation of dialysis. METHODS: We employed an observational cohort study design using data collected from patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis between 1996 and 2015 in facilities across 12 developed countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The main outcome was discontinuation of dialysis therapy. We analyzed the association between several patient characteristics and time to dialysis discontinuation by country and phase of study entry. RESULTS: A total of 259 343 DOPPS patients contributed data to the study, of whom 48 519 (18.7%) died during the study period. Of the decedents, 5808 (12.0%) discontinued dialysis before death. Rates of discontinuation were higher within the first few months after initiation of dialysis, among older adults, among those with a greater number of comorbidities and among those living in an institution. After adjustment for age, sex, dialysis duration, diabetes and dialysis era, rates of discontinuation were highest in Canada, the United States and Australia/New Zealand (33.8, 31.4 and 21.5 per 1000/yr, respectively) and lowest in Japan and Italy (< 0.1 per 1000/yr). Crude discontinuation rates were highest in dialysis facilities that were more likely to offer comprehensive conservative renal care to older adults. INTERPRETATION: We found persistent international variation in average rates of dialysis discontinuation not explained by differences in patient case-mix. These differences may reflect physician-, facility- and society-level differences in clinical practice. There may be opportunities for international cross-collaboration to improve support for patients with end-stage renal disease who prefer a more conservative approach.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estudios de Cohortes , Tratamiento Conservador/psicología , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal/métodosRESUMEN
Importance: Hospital safety culture remains a critical consideration when seeking to reduce medical errors and improve quality of care. Little is known regarding whether participation in a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide quality collaborative is associated with changes in hospital safety culture. Objective: To examine whether implementation of a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative is associated with changes in hospital safety culture. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 56-item validated survey covering 6 culture domains (teamwork, safety, operating room safety, working conditions, perceptions of management, and employee engagement), was administered to a random sample of physicians, nurses, operating room staff, administrators, and leaders across Illinois hospitals to assess hospital safety culture prior to launching a new statewide quality collaborative in 2015 and then again in 2017. The final analysis included 1024 respondents from 36 diverse hospitals, including major academic, community, and rural centers, enrolled in ISQIC (Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative). Exposures: Participation in a comprehensive, multicomponent statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative. Key components included enrollment in a common standardized data registry, formal quality and process improvement training, participation in collaborative-wide quality improvement projects, funding support for local projects, and guidance provided by surgeon mentors and process improvement coaches. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perception of hospital safety culture. Results: The overall survey response rate was 43.0% (580 of 1350 surveys) in 2015 and 39.0% (444 of 1138 surveys) in 2017 from 36 hospitals. Improvement occurred in all the overall domains, with significant improvement in teamwork climate (change, 3.9%; P = .03) and safety climate (change, 3.2%; P = .02). The largest improvements occurred in individual measures within domains, including physician-nurse collaboration (change, 7.2%; P = .004), reporting of concerns (change, 4.7%; P = .009), and reduction in communication breakdowns (change, 8.4%; P = .005). Hospitals with the lowest baseline safety culture experienced the largest improvements following collaborative implementation (change range, 11.1%-14.9% per domain; P < .05 for all). Although several hospitals experienced improvement in safety culture in 1 domain, most hospitals experienced improvement across several domains. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that hospital enrollment in a statewide quality improvement collaborative was associated with overall improvement in safety culture after implementing multiple learning collaborative strategies. Hospitals with the poorest baseline culture reported the greatest improvement following implementation of the collaborative.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud/normas , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Colaboración Intersectorial , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mentores , Quirófanos/normas , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cultura Organizacional , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de la Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Functional deficits observed at long-term follow-up in surgically released clubfeet have led to the adoption of a nonoperative approach. Gait results reported at age 5 years found ankle motion was limited in clubfeet treated by posteromedial release (PMR), compared with those that required posterior release (PR) or remained nonoperative. The purpose of this study was to assess plantar pressures in clubfeet that required surgical correction by 5 years of age. METHODS: Pedobarograph data were collected at age 5 years on patients with clubfeet that underwent surgical correction due to residual deformity or recurrence. Plantar pressures were assessed by subdividing the foot into the medial/lateral hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot regions. Variables included maximum force, contact area%, contact time% (CT%), the hindfoot-forefoot angle, and displacement of the center of pressure line. Surgical feet were divided into those that underwent an isolated PR versus PMR. A group of 72 clubfeet that remained nonoperative were matched by initial severity and used for comparison. RESULTS: Pedobarograph data from 53 patients (72 clubfeet; 25 PR and 47 PMR) showed minimal differences between the PR and PMR feet. Compared with the nonoperative group, both surgical groups had increased CT% in the medial hindfoot and medial midfoot regions. An increase in lateral hindfoot CT% was observed in the PMR group. In addition, CT% in the first metatarsal region in the PMR group was reduced compared with the nonoperative group. Lateralization is present across both surgical groups in the center of pressure line and hindfoot-forefoot angle. CONCLUSION: While there were minimal differences between surgical groups, patients who underwent PR exhibited pressure variables that were more comparable to the nonoperative group while the PMR group had greater deviations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.