Comparing Pre-Induction Ultrasound Parameters and the Bishop Score to Determine Whether Labor Induction Is Successful.

Background and Objectives: The incidence of labor induction is steadily increasing worldwide. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the ultrasound parameters and their mutual correlation and to analyze the parameters' predictive capability in assessing the success of labor induction. The secondary goal was to assess patients' tolerability and acceptance of transvaginal ultrasound and digital gynecological examination. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational follow-up study included 252 women selected for labor induction. The transvaginal ultrasound examination measured the posterior cervical angle, cervical length, the length and width funneling of the cervix, the distance between the head of the fetus and the external uterine os, and the position of the fetal occiput. After the ultrasound, a digital vaginal examination was performed (according to the Bishop score), and the women were asked to rate their perception of pain for each procedure. Results: The most common indication for labor induction was post-term pregnancy (57.59%), and the most common method of labor induction was oxytocin with amniotomy (70%). The results showed that a significant independent prediction of vaginal delivery could be provided based on the Bishop score and cervical length. Other investigated ultrasound parameters, the length and width of the funneling of the cervix (p < 0.001), the fetal head stage (p < 0.001), and the size of the posterior cervical angle (p < 0.05), showed statistical significance in relation to the success of labor induction. Patients reported lower discomfort and pain during transvaginal ultrasound examination (mean score 2, IQR 3) compared to digital examination (mean score 5, IQR 4), with p < 0.001. Conclusions: The results imply that the assessment of ultrasound parameters before induction of labor is necessary to predict the outcome and reduce the possibility of complications. In terms of tolerability and choice by the patients, the transvaginal ultrasound examination was better rated than the vaginal gynecological examination.

Patient Consent for Medical Student Pelvic Exams under Anesthesia: An Exploratory Retrospective Chart Review.

AbstractObjective: We performed this study to examine patients' choices to permit or refuse medical student pelvic examinations under anesthesia (EUAs) during planned gynecologic procedures. DESIGN: We conducted an exploratory retrospective chart review of electronic consent forms at a single academic medical center using contingency tables, logistic regression, and nonparametric tests to explore relationships between patient and physician characteristics and consent. RESULTS: We identified and downloaded electronic consent forms for a census of 4,000 patients undergoing gynecologic surgery from September 2020 through calendar year 2022. Forms were linked to anonymized medical record information. Of the 4,000 patients, 142 (3.6%) were removed from analysis because consent forms were incomplete. Of 3,858 patients, 308 (8.0%) were asked for EUA consent more than once, 46 of whom were not consistent. Overall, 3,308 (85.7%) patients consented every time asked, and 550 (14.2%) refused or limited EUA consent at least once. Nine patients limited their consent to female students, and two patients refused medical student participation at all. We performed exploratory multiple logistic regression analyses exploring differences in rates of consent across patient and physician demographic groups. CONCLUSIONS: We find that some patients are more likely than others to refuse a pelvic EUA, magnifying the dignitary harm from a nonconsensual invasion of intimate bodily integrity and perpetuating historic wrongs visited upon vulnerable people of color and religious minorities. Patients' rights to respect and control over their bodies require that physicians take seriously the ethical obligation to inform their patients and ask them for permission.

Gynecological health and uptake of gynecological care after domestic or sexual violence: a qualitative study in an emergency shelter.

BACKGROUND: Domestic and sexual violence have been linked to adverse gynecological and obstetric outcomes. Survivors often find it difficult to verbalize such violence due to feelings of shame and guilt. Vulnerable or socially excluded women are frequently excluded from research, particularly qualitative studies on violence. This study aimed to characterize the perceived impact of domestic or sexual violence on the gynecological health and follow-up among women with complex social situations. METHODS: We analyzed the data following inductive thematic analysis methods. RESULTS: Between April 2022 and January 2023, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews, lasting on average 90 min (range: 45-180), with women aged between 19 and 52, recruited in an emergency shelter in the Paris area. The women described physical and psychological violence mainly in the domestic sphere, their altered gynecological and mental health and their perception of gynecological care. The levels of uptake of gynecological care were related to the characteristics of the violence and their consequences. The description of gynecological examination was close to the description of coerced marital sexuality which was not considered to be sexual violence. Gynecological examination, likely to trigger embarrassment and discomfort, was always perceived to be necessary and justified, and consent was implied. CONCLUSION: This study can help question the appropriateness of professional practices related to the prevention of violence against women and gynecological examination practices. Any gynecological examination should be carried out within the framework of an equal relationship between caregiver and patient, for the general population and for women with a history of violence. It participates in preventing violence in the context of care, and more widely, in preventing violence against women.

Speculum self-insertion: an alternative method for gynaecological examination?

BACKGROUND: Speculum examination is an intrusive practice in the clinical care of women. It requires privacy and patients may experience discomfort or anxiety related to the procedure, which can result in delays or avoidance of necessary healthcare. Speculum self-insertion originated in the United States in the 1970s as part of the self-help movement. However, this clinical practice is largely unknown among healthcare providers and has rarely been assessed. AIM: This study investigates the women's views and healthcare providers' experiences of the self-insertion method. METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted between December 2021 and October 2022, including fieldwork combining semi-structured interviews (10 women) and focus groups associated with individual interviews of 13 healthcare providers. The data collected were independently coded by 2 authors and analysed using an inductive approach and grounded theory method. RESULTS: Speculum self-insertion was described as a way to decrease discomfort and facilitate speculum insertion. Self-insertion was proposed as a means of allowing women to participate in the examination, reducing their vulnerability against power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship. Both patients and healthcare providers have reported that speculum self-insertion is a method that can contribute to improving trust and communication during the examination. CONCLUSION: The practice of speculum self-insertion during the consultation is an alternative to traditional practitioner insertion and may be offered to all women by any practitioner who wishes to use this technique.

The use of a speculum is common in gynaecological consultations and most women are likely to encounter this tool during a medical examination. Several studies have already shown that this examination can cause pain and anxiety. Speculum self-insertion is not widely used and consists of allowing the woman to insert the speculum herself while being assisted by the practitioner. A study was conducted with 10 women and 13 healthcare providers to evaluate this technique and its impact on women's healthcare. This technique reduces the discomfort that can be felt during the examination. The woman will regain control of her body during the examination and this technique will reduce the hierarchical relationship felt by some women. A discussion about the gynaecological examination and women's healthcare is created during the consultation. Even if this technique does not seem to be suitable for all women, routinely offering self-insertion allows the healthcare provider to adapt to each woman and to her choice. The proposal of speculum self-insertion is an alternative technique that can improves women's feelings and their overall health.

Understanding the Diagnostic Odyssey of Women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome in Denmark: A Qualitative Interview Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is often a lengthy process that typically occurs during late adolescence. To support optimized and patient-centered care, this study aimed to investigate how women with MRKH syndrome experience the diagnostic process. METHODS: From January 2021 to March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 Danish women (≥25 years) diagnosed with MRKH syndrome. The interviews lasted a median of 92 minutes (range: 67-117). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: As teenagers or young women at the time, all women had experienced the diagnostic process in the nonspecialized healthcare sector as deeply upsetting due to distressing gynecological examinations, use of inappropriate language, and considerable diagnostic delay. When reaching the specialized health care sector, questions could finally be answered, but this information and support did not significantly alter their feelings of being "deviant" or "flawed". The women continued their diagnostic odyssey beyond the health care system and found online communities that gave them valuable support in living with MRKH syndrome. CONCLUSION: Women experience the diagnostic odyssey of MRKH syndrome as upsetting and potentially traumatizing beyond the diagnosis. Healthcare professionals can influence young women's understanding and experience of MRKH syndrome by using inclusive language (eg, avoiding "deformity") and addressing all that is normal and functioning (eg, external genitalia and potential for sexual pleasure). In nonurgent conditions, young women should be given the choice to delay a genital examination.

Do women with suspected endometriosis benefit from pelvic examination to improve diagnostic and management strategy?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the literature and expose best evidence available regarding the benefit of pelvic examination for women with suspected endometriosis METHODS: the AGREE II and GRADE systems for grading scientific evidence. RESULTS: Endometriosis is characterized by the heterogeneity in its clinical presentation with many different symptoms reported by patients. In the literature, questioning for each symptom has a high sensitivity, reaching 76-98 %, but lacks specificity (20 - 58 %). The symptom-based approach is limited by its low specificity, the absence of external validation for most of the models developed and the inability to characterize the extent of the disease, which could have major implications in the decision - making process. The latest systematic review and meta-analysis included a total of 30 studies with 4,565 participants, compared the diagnostic performance of several modalities for endometriosis. Physical examination had a pooled sensitivity of 71 % and a specificity of 69 %, with an average diagnostic accuracy of 0.76. Overall, the value of pelvic examination is conferred by its high positive likehood ratio and specificity. Besides its diagnostic value, pelvic examination improves patients' management by allowing the identification of a possible myofascial syndrome as a differential diagnosis. It also increases the quality of the preoperative workup and influences the quality of surgical excision and decreases the time to diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of studies in the primary care context, pelvic examination (vaginal speculum and digital vaginal examination) increases the diagnostic value for suspected endometriosis in association with questioning for symptoms.

The Effect of Virtual Reality On Pain and Anxiety Management During Pelvic Examination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: It is important for health care professionals to address women's pain and anxiety during pelvic examinations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of virtual reality (VR) on pain and anxiety management during pelvic examinations. METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial reported in according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines. The research was conducted with 128 women (64 intervention, 64 control) who received care at a tertiary hospital outpatient clinic between November 2021 and February 2022. The intervention group received VR application via virtual glasses during pelvic examination, while the control group received routine care. Anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory before and after the pelvic examination, and the Visual Analog Scale was used to assess pain after the pelvic examination. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05545488). RESULTS: The mean anxiety scores of the women in the intervention and control groups were similar pretest (59.00 and 57.77). The mean anxiety score decreased after the pelvic examination to 36.53 in the intervention group and 47.55 in the control group. Results indicated a significant main effect for group assignment (F9.56; η2 = .071; P = .002), a significant main effect for time (F384.14; η2 = .753; P < .001), and a significant interaction between group and time (F53.95; η2 = .300; P < .001). Pain scores after the pelvic examination were lower in the intervention group (4.25) than in the control group (6.41; P < .001). CONCLUSION: VR was effective in the management of pain and anxiety during pelvic examination. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of VR with other methods in reducing pain and anxiety during a pelvic examination.

Understanding Medical Students' Concerns about Explicit Informed Consent for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Medical student involvement in procedures, including pelvic exams under anesthesia (EUAs), is a fundamental part of medical education. While guidelines exist regarding informed consent for medical student participation, there is ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the requirement and modality of obtaining explicit consent for pelvic EUAs. This study aims to explore the perceptions and experiences of medical students who do not favor an explicit informed consent process for pelvic EUAs. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine who had completed their obstetrics and gynecology core clerkship. The questionnaire included both quantitative and qualitative sections. Qualitative analysis was conducted using a mixed inductive and deductive coding approach, with key patterns, categories, and themes identified through content analysis. RESULTS: Among the 201 students included in the analysis, 50 students did not endorse an explicit informed consent process for pelvic EUAs. Themes that emerged from their open-ended responses included: (1) the belief that medical student involvement is implicitly included in patient agreements at teaching hospitals; (2) the perception that pelvic EUAs are an essential first step in gynecologic surgery; (3) the view that pelvic EUAs are comparable to other medical procedures; (4) concern that explicit consent would limit educational opportunities; and (5) the belief that pelvic EUAs are not harmful or traumatic to patients. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the justifications provided by medical students who do not support explicit informed consent for pelvic EUAs. While some arguments align with previous ethical analyses, this study provides empirical and qualitative insights into students' perspectives. The belief that patients implicitly consent to medical student involvement at teaching hospitals warrants further examination, as patient awareness and understanding may vary. The differentiation between pelvic exams and other EUAs, as well as the perception of minimal harm, should be critically evaluated in the context of trauma-informed care and patient autonomy. Furthermore, the interconnectedness of educational and surgical aspects of pelvic EUAs should be clarified in patient-physician communication. CONCLUSION: Understanding the perspectives of medical students who do not favor explicit consent for pelvic EUAs is crucial for developing and implementing consent processes. The findings emphasize the need for enhanced patient-physician communication, standardized frameworks for learner involvement, and curricular adaptations to address patient perceptions and trauma-informed care. Future research should explore these themes in larger and more diverse cohorts to inform best practices in obtaining informed consent for medical student participation in pelvic EUAs.

Frequency of digital vaginal examination and associated factors among mothers admitted to labor and delivery wards in public health facilities of Arba Minch town, southern Ethiopia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of digital examination and its associated factors among laboring mothers in public health facilities in Arba Minch town, southern Ethiopia. Digital vaginal examination (DVE) is the commonly applied clinical assessment method used to discover the progress of labor and delivery. However, frequent DVE may not be free of risk for maternal and neonatal health, and pain during intrapartum care. METHODS: An institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study was employed from May 3 to July 6, 2022. Study participants were selected by a serial sampling method. Data were entered into epi data version 7.2 and exported to SPSS v.25 for data analysis. Binary and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to assess associations between study variables. Statistical significance was declared at a P value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 374 women responded to the interview, making a response rate of 98.4%. In all, 230 (61.5%) of the laboring mothers underwent five or more DVE. Being a primipara, being in latent phase at admission, having augmentation of labor, prolonged labor, being admitted with intact membranes, and vacuum delivery showed significant associations with frequent DVE. CONCLUSION: Frequency of DVE among laboring mothers is relatively high in the study area. The frequent DVE were mainly caused by healthcare provider's interventions to shorten the time of labor. Emphasis on training and monitoring the practice of healthcare givers would be helpful to mitigate this problem.

Psychological distress and pain related to gynecologic exams among female survivors of sexual and physical violence: A systematic review.

Gender-based violence is prevalent globally, yet the impacts of sexual and physical violence on women's experiences of routine gynecologic care are not well understood. The purpose of this systematic review of quantitative research is to describe (a) psychological distress and pain related to gynecologic exams among female survivors of sexual and physical violence and (b) differences in distress or pain between survivors and women without this history. Fourteen articles based on 12 discrete studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous, with a moderate risk of bias; therefore, a descriptive summary approach was utilized rather than a meta-analytic approach. Synthesized results indicated that survivors of violence experience mild-to-severe levels of distress and mild-to-moderate levels of pain related to gynecologic exams. The findings suggest that survivors of sexual or physical violence experience higher levels of distress than women without this history (i.e., moderate to severe), and this difference was further accentuated among women with more severe posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Differences in pain by violence history and PTSS severity were not consistently observed, possibly due to a lack of variability in ratings and small sample sizes. Additional research is needed that bolsters the measurement of exam-related distress and pain, adjusts for confounding variables, and explores mechanisms by which sexual and physical violence impact care experiences. Further empirical work will be critical to developing interventions at the patient and provider levels to improve women's experiences of care.

Pelvic examination under anesthesia by learners at the time of abortion: Who accepts and who declines?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of and factors correlated with accepting a pelvic examination under anesthesia (EUA) by learners at the time of surgical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review assessing the prevalence of and comparing factors associated with accepting EUA by learners at the time of abortion. RESULTS: Most (88%) of the 274 patients accepted EUA by learners. Declining was associated with prior intimate partner violence. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients accept EUA by learners at the time of abortion. IMPLICATIONS: In adhering to fundamental principles of medical ethics, professional guidelines, and legal mandates, consent prior to pelvic EUA by learners should be obtained universally.

Incidence of Abnormal Findings During Pelvic Examinations in Women Aged 21-35 Years.

To describe the incidence of abnormal gynecologic examination findings in asymptomatic compared with symptomatic patients during preventive visits, we conducted a retrospective study of 1,121 visits for patients between the ages of 21 and 35 years from January 2017 to March 2017. Only 1.2% (95% CI, 0.5%,1.9%) of asymptomatic patients had abnormal findings on pelvic examination, compared with 32.4% (95% CI, 27.0%, 37.8%) of those with symptoms ( P ≤.001). In symptomatic patients, the most common symptoms were vaginal discharge (25.1%), pelvic pain (16.4%), and vaginal bleeding (15.7%). In asymptomatic patients, the most common findings were bacterial vaginosis and Candida infection. Asymptomatic patients presenting for a routine preventive visit have low rates of abnormalities detected on examination, and routine pelvic examinations should be re-considered.

A gynaecological examination could have prevented a long and painful diagnostic work-up of a patient with hymen imperforatus.

Haematocolpos, caused by imperforate hymen, is a rare condition where menstrual blood accumulates in the vagina. Adolescent girls presenting with amenorrhoea, cyclical abdominal pain, and pelvis mass should be evaluated for this condition. Diagnosis requires a gynaecological examination. However, myths surrounding the hymen may impede proper medical care. Addressing these misconceptions is essential for promoting gynaecological care and ensuring timely evaluation and treatment. This case report emphasises the significance of effective communication in preventing misdiagnoses and care delays.

Consent Policies for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia Performed by Medical Students: A National Assessment.

Background: Medical students report low confidence in their ability to perform pelvic exams. Pelvic exams under anesthesia (EUA) are one way for students to practice the exam, but this needs to be balanced with patients' bodily autonomy through explicit disclosure and consent. This study seeks to characterize U.S. medical schools' policies regarding the consent process for students to perform pelvic EUA. Materials and Methods: Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors were anonymously surveyed about their medical school affiliated hospitals' (MSAH) consent policies for pelvic EUA in general and explicitly for medical students. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to test for differences between categorical variables and thematic analysis was used to review qualitative responses. Results: A total of 87 clerkship directors completed the survey (44.4% response rate). Most MSAH explicitly consent patients for pelvic EUA (80.2%), and specifically for performance by medical students (79.1%). Sixty-nine respondents (79.3%) stated that performing pelvic EUA is important for medical student education. Five themes were identified from review of qualitative responses, including consent policy details, the importance of pelvic EUA, other opportunities for pelvic exam teaching, barriers to standardization, and outside guidance. Conclusions: The pelvic EUA is a necessary part of both surgical care and medical education but patient dignity must be protected too. Most MSAH have consent policies for students to perform pelvic EUA. Still, these policies need to be further strengthened and standardized across institutions to protect patients' rights while continuing to teach students the pelvic exam.

New method of video-assisted vaginoscopy in Nellore heifers.

Vaginoscopy allows an intravaginal endoscopic evaluation and can help in the diagnosis of female bovine genital tract disorders. The aim of this study is to validate a new method of gynaecological examination using a Scope VOR&GDI videovaginoscope. Twenty-six heifers were used, divided into 2 groups with 13 animals, control group (GC) and videovaginoscopic group (GV). In the CG, vaginoscopy was performed with a vaginal speculum and in the GV with a Scope VOR&GDI videovaginoscope. All heifers underwent vaginoscopy on day 0 (D0), and 9 days later, on day 9 (D9). Vaginoscopy provided adequate intravaginal inspection. In the CG, 23% (3/13) of the heifers showed discomfort during the test. In GV, vaginal inspection was better due to better image quality. The videovaginoscope is the most effective equipment for carrying out the vaginoscopy procedure in Nellore heifers, as it produces sharper and clearer images and can help in the diagnostic and therapeutic routine of veterinarians.

Primary extracranial meningioma of the pelvis discovered on screening pelvic examination.

Many conditions that affect a woman's health can be evaluated through the pelvic examination. Early detection and treatment of a range of gynaecologic and non-gynaecological conditions, including unusual pelvic masses, may decrease a woman's morbidity and mortality. Here, we have a female patient in her early 20s who was found to have a mass on her first screening pelvic examination. Subsequent imaging followed by surgical resection were performed with the final diagnosis of a pelvic meningioma. Routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women may be more useful than merely screening for cervical cancer and sexually transmitted infections. Once detected, the differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass may include aetiologies outside of the gynaecological organ system.