RESUMEN
Background: Duodenal stump fistula represents an infrequent but serious complication after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of stitching for reinforcement of duodenal stump. Methods: The data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed between August 2022 and June 2023. According to the different reinforcement methods of duodenal stump, included patients were subdivided into three groups as follows: Group A, duodenal stump was treated with double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of stitching; Group B, duodenal stump was reinforced by continuous suture using a barbed suture; and Group C, duodenal stump without any additional processing. The incidences of duodenal stump fistula between three groups were documented and compared. Moreover, the independent risk factors associated with duodenal stump fistula were analyzed using the logistic regression analysis. Results: No postoperative duodenal stump fistula occurred in Group A, which was significantly different from Group B and Group C (P = .007). In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.191; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.088-1.303), body mass index (OR, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.727-0.935), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR, 4.495; 95% CI, 1.264-15.992) were the risk factors for duodenal stump fistula. Conclusion: Double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of suture can be conducted in a relatively short operation period and could prevent the incidence of duodenal stump fistula to some extent.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Fístula Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Técnicas de Sutura , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Enfermedades Duodenales/cirugía , Enfermedades Duodenales/etiología , Enfermedades Duodenales/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Gastroenterostomía/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a visceral protective layer (VPL) on the formation of enteroatmospheric fistulae (EAF) in open abdomen treatment (OAT) for peritonitis. BACKGROUND: EAF formation is a severe complication of OAT. Despite the widespread use of OAT, there are no robust evidence-based recommendations for preventing EAF. METHODS: A total of 120 peritonitis patients with secondary peritonitis as a result of a perforation of a hollow viscus or anastomotic insufficiency who had undergone OAT were included, and 14 clinical parameters were recorded in prospective OAT databases at 2 tertiary referral centers. For this analysis, patients with a VPL were assigned to the treatment group and those without a VPL to the control group. Propensity Score (PS) matching was performed. Known risk factors in OAT such as malignant disease, mortality, emergency operation, OAT duration, and fascial closure were matching variables. The influence of VPL on EAF formation was statistically evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: With 34 patients in each group, no notable differences were identified with regard to age, sex, underlying disease, mortality, emergency operation, fascial closure, and OAT duration. Overall, a mortality rate of 22.1% for OAT due to peritonitis was observed. Mean OAT duration was approximately 9 days, and secondary fascial closure was achieved in more than two-thirds of all patients. Fascial traction was used in more than 75% of cases. EAF formation was significantly more frequent in the control group (EAF formation: VPL group 2.9% vs control 26.5%; P = 0.00). In the final regression analysis, the use of VPL resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of EAF formation (odds ratio 0.08; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.71, P = 0.02), which translates to a relative risk reduction of 89.1%. CONCLUSION: VPL effectively prevents EAF formation during OAT in patients with peritonitis. We recommend the consistent use of VPL as part of a standardized OAT treatment algorithm.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Peritonitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , VíscerasRESUMEN
Anorectal malformation includes various types of anomalies. The goal of definitive surgery is achievement of fecal continence. Twenty years have passed since laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was reported by Georgeson. Since LAARP is gaining popularity, its long-term outcomes should be evaluated. Presently, there is no evidence regarding the optimal method of ligating and dividing the fistula correctly and creating the pull-through canal accurately. Rectal prolapse and remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) tend to develop more often in LAARP patients than in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) patients; however, robust evidence is not available. Prolapse may be prevented by suture fixation of the rectum to the presacral fascia; however, if prolapse occurs, the indication, timing, and the best method for surgical correction remain unclear. Most patients with ROOF are asymptomatic, and there is controversy regarding the indications for ROOF resection. This article aimed to detail the various modifications of the LAARP procedures reported previously and to describe the surgical outcomes, particularly focusing on rectal prolapse, ROOF, and fecal continence, by reviewing the literature. Functional outcomes after LAARP were almost similar to those noted after PSARP, and we have demonstrated that LAARP is not inferior to PSARP with respect to fecal continence. Although there is controversy regarding the application of LAARP for recto-bulbar cases, we believe that LAARP is still evolving, and we can achieve better outcomes by improving the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/cirugía , Malformaciones Anorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Recto/cirugía , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Prolapso Rectal/etiología , Prolapso Rectal/prevención & control , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMEN
Objective. A Perioperative Safety Checklist (PSC) for gastric cancer (GC) was established to evaluate the effects of PSC on the clinical outcomes of GC. Methods. This single-center preliminary observational study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital included patients with GC who underwent surgery from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, treated without PSC (allocated to the control group) and those who underwent surgery between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2017, managed according to the PSC designated as the PSCGC (Perioperative Safety Checklist for Gastric Cancer) group. Results. Overall, 1072 cases were enrolled, 556 cases in PSCGC group and 526 cases in control group. After matching, there were 474 patients in each group. PSC intervention led to significant reductions of the incidence of postoperative intestinal fistula formation (P = .034), the incidence of unplanned secondary surgery (P = 0.039), and the total hospitalization expenses (P < .001). Total completion rate of all 14 checklists items was 79.1%. Intraoperative blood loss in the complete and partial implementation groups was significantly lower than the complete nonimplementation group (P = .002), whereas hospitalization cost showed an opposite trend, which was significantly higher in the incomplete nonimplementation group (P = .015). Conclusion. PSC implementation was associated with a decreased incidence of gastrointestinal fistula formation, unplanned secondary surgery, and hospitalization cost in patients with GC. However, it had no effect on the in-hospital mortality, the incidence of postoperative complications during hospitalization (ie, incision complications and lung infections), unplanned secondary admission, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Gastrectomía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A mesh-related intestinal fistula is an uncommon and challenging complication of ventral hernia repair. Optimal management is unclear owing to lack of prospective or long-term data. METHODS: We reviewed our prospective data for mesh-related intestinal fistulas from 2004 to 2017and compared suture repair versus ventral hernia repair with mesh at the time of mesh-related intestinal fistula takedown. RESULTS: Eighty-two mesh-related intestinal fistulas were treated; none of the fistulas had closed spontaneously, and all fistula persisted at the time of our treatment. Mean age was 61 ± 12 years with 33-month follow-up. Comorbidities were similar between groups. Defects were 2.5-times larger in ventral hernia repair with mesh (324 ± 392 cm2 vs 1301 ± 133 cm2; P = .044). Components separation (64% vs 21%; P = .0003) and panniculectomy (35% vs 7%; P = .0074) were more common in ventral hernia repair with mesh. Mortality occurred in 4 patients. Complications were similar. In patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with non-bridged, acellular, porcine dermal matrix, hernia recurrence was less than in patients without mesh (26% vs 66%; P = .0030). Only partial excision of the mesh involved with the fistula resulted in a substantial increase in developing another fistula (29% vs 6%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing preperitoneal ventral hernia repair with mesh for mesh-related intestinal fistula had a lesser rate of hernia recurrence and similar complications compared to suture repair despite larger hernias. Complete mesh excision decreases the risk of fistula recurrence. We maintain that ventral hernia repair with mesh during mesh-related intestinal fistula takedown represents the best opportunity for a durable herniorrhaphy.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Anciano , Animales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiología , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/instrumentación , Reoperación/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/instrumentación , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Treatment of an open abdomen (OA) wound combined with an intestinal fistula is a challenge in the clinic. Here, inspired by the antibacterial activity of graphene (G) and its derivatives, we present a hybrid patch based on the ability of graphene and polycaprolactone (PCL) to kill bacteria and save the cells in a wound. Benefiting from the antibacterial ability of graphene oxide (GO), cells could survive in the presence of bacteria. With the increased ability to protect cells, this patch accelerated wound healing in an OA and intestinal fistula wound model. Additionally, the sub-acute toxicity score showed no extra damage to organs. In conclusion, the employment of the hybrid material for an OA and an intestinal fistula wound healing is encouraging. A hybrid patch based on graphene oxide and polycaprolactone electrospun was generated for open abdomen and fistula wound. The application of the hybrid patch could save the cells from bacteria which contribute to accelerating wound healing.
Asunto(s)
Grafito/química , Grafito/farmacología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/instrumentación , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Animales , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Adhesión Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayo de Materiales , Nanofibras/química , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Duodenal stump fistula (DSF) after gastrectomy is of low frequency but a critical complication in gastric cancer surgery. Manual oversewing for reinforcement of the duodenal stump is not applicable when free longitudinal margin is short and has technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery. This trial evaluated the safety and feasibility of using a linear stapler with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet for duodenal stump closure and reinforcement in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: This multi-institutional, prospective phase II trial included gastric cancer patients who were scheduled to undergo distal or total gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction. In all cases, duodenum was transected using a linear stapler with PGA sheet. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative DSF. Sample size was set at 100 patients considering an expected value of 3% and threshold value of 8% with one-sided testing at a 10% significance level. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and June 2015, a total of 100 patients were registered in this trial. Postoperative DSF was observed in two cases (2.0%, 90% CI 0.4-6.2%) which was developed on postoperative days 13 and 20. Intraoperative bleeding at the duodenal stump staple line was observed in one case but was easily controlled without additional suturing. Postoperative bleeding was not observed in any of the cases. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that the use of PGA sheet as a reinforcement material for closure of the duodenal stump during gastrectomy for gastric cancer is both safe and feasible. Trial registration number UMIN 000014398.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Duodeno/cirugía , Gastrectomía , Muñón Gástrico/cirugía , Ácido Poliglicólico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Grapado Quirúrgico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
There are very few clinical studies that highlight a definitive and comprehensive guideline for the management of enterocutaneous fistulas. Most accepted guidelines are found in textbooks and are taken from expert advice and case reports. The goal of this review is to highlight advancements relevant to the management of enterocutaneous fistulas from the recent two to three years. Although strong evidence-based guidelines are lacking, the consensus is that a multidisciplinary team working with a clear treatment plan targeting multiple aspects of management can maximize patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Drenaje , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Apoyo Nutricional , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Técnicas de Cierre de HeridasRESUMEN
Intestinal fistula, as a serious complication after abdominal surgery, not only leads to a series of pathophysiological changes such as fluid loss, malnutrition and organ dysfunction, but also causes the severe abdominal infection, which often threatens the life of patients. How to make the diagnosis and give the treatment of intestinal fistula is the key to save the lives of high-risk patients. In our hospital, during the past course of diagnosis and treatment for intestinal fistula complicated with severe abdominal infection, based on the combination of literatures at home and abroad with our clinical experiences for many years, an effective three-stage prevention and treatment strategy was formed gradually, which included early diagnosis, effective treatment of infection source, open drainage of abdominal infection and early enteral nutrition support. This strategy subverts the traditional concept of surgery alone, and becomes an effective means to save patients with severe abdominal infection.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Fístula Intestinal/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/diagnóstico , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Infecciones Intraabdominales/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Apoyo Nutricional/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Duodenal injury is a serious abdominal organ injury. Duodenal fistula is one of the most serious complications in gastrointestinal surgery, which is concerned for its critical status, difficulty in treatment and high mortality. Thoracic and abdominal compound closed injury and a small part of open injury are common causes of duodenal injury. Iatrogenic or traumatic injury, malnutrition, cancer, tuberculosis, Crohn's disease etc. are common causes of duodenal fistula, however, there has been still lacking of ideal diagnosis and treatment by now. The primary treatment strategy of duodenal fistula is to determine the cause of disease and its key point is prevention, including perioperative parenteral and enteral nutrition support, improvement of hypoproteinemia actively, avoidance of stump ischemia by excessive separate duodenum intraoperatively, performance of appropriate duodenum stump suture to ensure the stump blood supply, and avoidance of postoperative input loop obstruction, postoperative stump bleeding or hematoma etc. Once duodenal fistula occurs, a simple and reasonable operation can be selected and performed after fluid prohibition, parenteral and enteral nutrition, acid suppression, enzyme inhibition, anti-infective treatment and maintaining water salt electrolyte and acid-base balance. Double tube method, duodenal decompression and peritoneal drainage can reduce duodenal fistula-related complications, and then reduce the mortality, which can save the lives of patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Enfermedades Duodenales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Duodenales/terapia , Duodeno/lesiones , Duodeno/cirugía , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Drenaje , Enfermedades Duodenales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Duodenales/etiología , Duodeno/irrigación sanguínea , Nutrición Enteral , Humanos , Hipoproteinemia/terapia , Fístula Intestinal/diagnóstico , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Apoyo Nutricional , Nutrición Parenteral , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Técnicas de Sutura , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicacionesRESUMEN
Introduction: The risk of digestive fistula in patients operated for gastric neoplasm is increased due to biological imbalances generated by the cancer's progression, by diagnosis in advanced stages, and by the scale of intervention. Under these circumstances the use of some technical means to protect digestive sutures in these patients is useful. AIM: To analyse the efficiency of technical means to protect the digestive sutures in patients operated in various stages of development of gastric cancer. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a group of 130 patients operated for gastric cancer in the 1st General Surgery and Oncology Clinic of the Bucharest Institute of Oncology, between 2010-2014. Results: 38.46% of the patients in the study group presented stage IV cancer with multiple complications and biological imbalances. 52 total gastrectomies and 40 gastric resections were carried out, while in 34 patients palliative "tumour excisions" or other types of palliative surgery were performed. In 15 of the cases with gastric resection a duodenal decompression probe was used, while in 13 of the patients with total gastrectomy an oeso-jejunal aspiration probe together with an oeso-jejunal feeding probe were used as additional technical measures to prevent fistula formation. The incidence of duodenal stump fistula was 7.69%, that of oeso-jejunal anastomosis fistula was 2.3%, with an overall mortality of 3.07% and that of gastro-jejunal anastomosis fistula was 0.76%. CONCLUSION: Given the risk of fistula development in patients with gastric cancer, as well as the increased risk in advanced stages of cancer development, we consider that the use of technical means of protection of digestive sutures is beneficial and opportune, lowering the incidence of fistulas, reducing their output, pathophysiological effects, and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Fístula del Sistema Digestivo/prevención & control , Gastrectomía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Fístula del Sistema Digestivo/etiología , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Gástrica/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rumanía/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis and to identify possible risk factors of fistula formation. METHODS: The hospital OPS-database (time period 2005-2014) was searched to identify patients treated with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis, who underwent vacuum-assisted closure therapy. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed for patients' characteristics, cause of peritonitis, duration of vacuum therapy, number of relaparotomies, fascial closure rates, and risk factors of fistula formation. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (19 male, 24 female) with a median age of 65 years (range 24-90 years) were identified. The major cause of secondary peritonitis was anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis or bowel perforation, the median APACHE II score was 11. Median duration of VAC treatment was 12 days (range 3-88 days). Twenty of 43 (47 %) patients died from septic complications. Delayed fascial closure was obtained by suturing in 20 of 43 patients (47 %). Overall 16 of 43 (37 %) patients developed enteroatmospheric fistulas. Re-explorations after starting VAC treatment and duration of VAC therapy were significantly associated with the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistulas (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis determined the optimal duration of VAC therapy to reduce the risk of fistula formation at 13 days. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term VAC treatment of patients with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis results in a relatively low fascial closure rate and a high risk of fistula formation.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Pared Abdominal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/fisiopatología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF) is an enteric fistula occurring in the setting of an open abdomen, thus creating a communication between the GI tract and the external atmosphere. Management and nursing of patients suffering EAF carries several challenges, and prevention of EAF should be the first and best treatment option. PURPOSE: Here, we present a novel modified classification of EAF and review the current state of the art in its prevention and management including nutritional issues and feeding strategies. We also provide an overview on surgical management principles, highlighting several surgical techniques for dealing with EAF that have been reported in the literature throughout the years. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy for EAF should be multidisciplinary and multifaceted. Surgical treatment is most often multistep and should be tailored to the single patient, based on the type and characteristics of the EAF, following its correct identification and classification. The specific experience of surgeons and nursing staff in the management of EAF could be enhanced, applying distinct simulation-based ex vivo training models.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/clasificación , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patologíaRESUMEN
Inflammatory bowel disease patients will likely come to the surgeon's attention at some point in their course of disease, and they present several unique anatomic, metabolic, and physiologic challenges. Specific and well-recognized complications of chronic Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis are presented as well as an organized and evidence-based approach to the medical and surgical management of such disease sequelae. Topics addressed in this article include intestinal fistula and short bowel syndrome, pouch complications, and deep venous thrombosis with emphasis placed on optimization of the patient's physiologic state for best outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/etiología , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Diverticular disease represents the most common disease affecting the colon in the Western world. Most cases remain asymptomatic, but some others will have symptoms or develop complications. The aims of treatment in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease are to prevent complications and reduce the frequency and intensity of symptoms. Fibre, probiotics, mesalazine, rifaximin and their combinations seem to be usually an effective therapy. In the uncomplicated diverticulitis, outpatient management is considered the optimal approach in the majority of patients, and oral antibiotics remain the mainstay of treatment. Admission to hospital and intravenous antibiotic are recommended only when the patient is unable to intake food orally, affected by severe comorbidity or does not improve. However, inpatient management and intravenous antibiotics are necessary in complicated diverticulitis. The role of surgery is also changing. Most diverticulitis-associated abscesses can be treated with antibiotics and/or percutaneous drainage and emergency surgery is considered only in patients with acute peritonitis. Finally, patient related factors, and not the number of recurrences, play the most important role in selecting recipients of elective surgery to avoid recurrences.
Asunto(s)
Diverticulosis del Colon , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Contraindicaciones , Fibras de la Dieta/uso terapéutico , Diverticulitis del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Diverticulitis del Colon/etiología , Diverticulitis del Colon/prevención & control , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Diverticulosis del Colon/complicaciones , Diverticulosis del Colon/fisiopatología , Diverticulosis del Colon/prevención & control , Diverticulosis del Colon/terapia , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Mesalamina/uso terapéutico , Parasimpatolíticos/uso terapéutico , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Vitamina D/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Double pylorus (DP), is a form of gastroduodenal fistula, which consists of a short accessory canal from the gastic antrum to the duodenal bulb, and mostly occrus in the background of peptic ulcer disease. Prevalence, as well long-term follow-up of patients with DP is less elucidated in western countries. Aim of our study was to analyse demografic, clinical and endoscopic characteristics in our case-series. During 2008-2013. a total of 23836 upper endoscopies were performed in 16759 patients. DP was diagnosed in 6 patients (prevalence of 0.04%). The follow-up period was f 8 to 72 months. In 87% DP was a complication of the upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In 83% cases opening of the fistula was on lesser curvature of gastric antrumu. During follow-up period the fistula healing did not occur in any of our patients. DP is a very rare entity, with a benign course of the disease Associated comorbidity and use of ulceriform medications plays important role in persistence of DP, wheras possible eradication of Helicobacter infection in this background remains elusive.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Gástrica/epidemiología , Fístula Gástrica/patología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiología , Fístula Intestinal/patología , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Anciano , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Femenino , Fístula Gástrica/prevención & control , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in medical therapies, many children with Crohn's disease (CD) will require bowel resection. Although previous registry studies have attempted to identify risk factors for surgery, the effect of immunomodulators and biologics (IMB) on surgical indications has not been well characterized. METHODS: We reviewed a series of 125 children with CD who underwent bowel resection with reanastomosis between 1977 and 2011 and were followed up for at least 6 months. We compared patients who underwent surgery for perforating disease (abscess or internal fistula) and patients who were operated on for medically refractory or fibrostenosing disease. Between these 2 groups, we examined medications received before surgery. Other demographic and disease-specific covariates were examined. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients who received IMB before surgery, only 19 patients (23%) required surgery for a perforating complication of CD, whereas 63 patients (77%) required surgery for strictures or medically refractory disease. In contrast, of the 43 patients who did not receive IMB preoperatively, 20 patients (45%) developed a perforating complication and 23 patients (53%) required surgery for strictures or refractory disease. These differences across groups were significant, with a lower rate of operation for perforating disease among patients receiving preoperative IMB therapy (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In our surgical cohort, children with CD who were treated with IMB were less likely to have surgery for perforating disease. This finding raises the possibility that the administration of IMB in children who require surgery may be associated with a difference in disease behavior.