Simultaneous Reconstruction of the Esophagus and Posterior Tracheal Wall Using a Combination of Free Jejunal and Mesenteric Flaps: A Case Report.

Free jejunal transfer is one of the most useful procedures for reconstructing circumferential defects following total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (TPLE). When an extended resection of the surrounding soft tissue is performed in addition to the TPLE, the defect may require another flap in addition to the jejunal flap to reconstruct the soft tissue defect. In such multiple defects, the choice of reconstruction method remains unanswered and unsolved. Herein, our objective was to clarify the utility of our newly developed technique of simultaneous reconstruction of two defects in the neck using a combination of free jejunal and mesenteric flaps. An 81-year-old man had defects in the upper esophagus, total larynx/pharynx, and posterior tracheal wall caused by the resection of invasive upper esophagus cancer anterior to the membranous part of the trachea. A chimera flap composed of a 15 cm free jejunal and mesenteric flap along with 15 cm of surplus mesentery was harvested; the jejunum was inserted into the esophageal defect and the mesentery was placed on the tracheal defect. The patient exhibited a favorable postoperative course at 8 months with no recurrence or stenosis in the reconstructed respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. This method offers a straightforward vessel anastomosis, making it a good and reasonable option for reconstructing partial tracheal defects along with TPLE.

Survival Outcome Superiority of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy Compared with Chemoradiotherapy for T4aM0 Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Database Study of Japan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provides a better prognostic outcome in patients with T4aM0 hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPSCC) using a nationwide database. METHODS: All data were obtained from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan, and information from patients who were newly diagnosed with T4aM0 HPSCC between 2011 and 2015 was extracted. The primary endpoint was disease-specific survival (DSS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustments was used for survival analyses. RESULTS: Our cohort included 1143 patients. The TPL and CRT groups included 724 and 419 patients, respectively. Following IPTW adjustments, both the OS and DSS of the TPL group were significantly longer than those of the CRT group (P = .02 and P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Survival superiority was demonstrated for patients with T4aM0 HPSCC treated with TPL compared with those treated with CRT.

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting. METHODS: We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL. RESULTS: Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11-70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64-3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible.

Jejunum free flap for head and neck reconstruction, a step-by-step surgical technique videos.

Circular pharyngolaryngectomy for oncologic resection requires a tubular reconstruction. Different options can be proposed to the patient: digestive free flap, fasciocutaneous flap, or musculocutaneous flap. The jejunum free flap is a tubular flap commonly used in esophageal and pharyngeal reconstruction with good functional outcomes and an acceptable rate of complications. Reconstruction with a jejunum free flap is an ideal choice. Patients at Gustave Roussy Institute (Villejuif, France) were offered a jejunum flap free flap for all circular pharyngolaryngectomies. The surgical technique is explained with a step-by-step video. The jejunum flap free flap has many advantages in circular pharyngolaryngectomy. This video article explains surgical steps for other teams.

Reconstruction techniques using free jejunal transfer for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy.

BACKGROUND: Total pharyngolaryngectomy is sometimes combined with total glossectomy for advanced hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancers involving the tongue base. The optimal reconstruction method for total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy has not been established due to a considerable diameter mismatch between the floor of mouth and the esophageal stump. This report describes two reconstruction methods using free jejunal transfer. METHODS: Five consecutive patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy with total glossectomy were included, with a mean age of 67.0 (range 55-75) years. Primary tumors included tongue, hypopharyngeal, cervical esophagus, and laryngeal cancers. The mean defect size was 17.0 (16-19) × 6.8 (6-7) cm. Surgical techniques involved either a simple incision or a two-segment method to address the size mismatch between the jejunum and the floor of mouth. In the simple incision method, a longitudinal cut was made to the antimesenteric or paramesenteric border of a jejunum wall to expand the orifice. In the two-segment method, a jejunal graft was separated into two segments to reconstruct the floor of mouth and the cervical esophagus, and these segments were connected with a longitudinal incision to the cervical esophageal segment to form a funnel-shaped conduit. RESULTS: Of the five patients, three underwent the simple incision method and two the two-segment method. Postoperative pharyngoesophagography showed a smooth passage for all patients. Postoperative courses were uneventful except for one flap loss due to arterial thrombosis. Four patients achieved oral feeding, while one became gastric-tube dependent. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 (4-39) months, one patient required tube feeding, two tolerated full liquid, and two consumed a soft diet. CONCLUSIONS: Both the simple incision and two-segment methods achieved satisfactory swallowing function. The choice between these reconstruction methods may depend on the extent of resection of the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Reconstruction with free jejunal flap in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa complicated with hypopharyngeal cancer: A case report.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) encompasses a range of rare genetic dermatological conditions characterized by mucocutaneous fragility and a predisposition to blister formation, often triggered by minimal trauma. Blisters in the pharynx and esophagus are well-documented, particularly in dystrophic EB (DEB). However, there have been few reports of mucocutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the head and neck region, for which surgery is usually avoided. This report presents the first case of free jejunal flap reconstruction after total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal cancer in a 57-year-old patient with DEB. The patient with a known diagnosis of DEB had a history of SCC of the left hand and esophageal dilatation for esophageal stricture. PET-CT imaging during examination of systemic metastases associated with the left-hand SCC revealed abnormal accumulation in the hypopharynx, which was confirmed as SCC by biopsy. Total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy was performed, followed by reconstruction of the defect using a free jejunal flap. A segment of the jejunum, approximately 15 cm in length, was transplanted with multiple vascular pedicles. The patient made an uneventful recovery postoperatively and was able to continue oral intake 15 months later with no complications and no recurrence of SCC in the head and neck region. While cutaneous SCC is common in DEB, extracutaneous SCC is relatively rare. In most previous cases, non-surgical approaches with radiotherapy and chemotherapy were chosen due to skin fragility and multimorbidity. In the present case, vascular fragility and mucosal damage of the intestinal tract were not observed, and routine vascular and enteric anastomoses could be performed, with an uneventful postoperative course. Our findings suggest that highly invasive surgery, including free tissue transplantation such as with a free jejunal flap, can be performed in patients with DEB.

Postlaryngectomy pharyngoplasty with melolabial flap.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series describing the use of a melolabial flap for postlaryngectomy pharyngoplasty. It is an excellent alternative for pharyngoplasty, especially in cases post chemoradiotherapy. It accomplishes the goal while removing the restrictions of local and distant flaps. Although donor site morbidity is acceptable, specific consent is required due to the possibility of functional and cosmetic impairment. Additional cases with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period can assist corroborate our first findings. In addition, because we tend to protect facial vessels for this flap, a follow-up about the compromise of oncological safety at level IB is required. In our case series, however, there was no recurrence until the final follow-up. As a result, it is a better option to pharyngoplasty post laryngectomy.

Reconstruction for Salvage Laryngectomy With Limited Pharyngectomy.

Importance: Closure technique for optimization of postoperative and functional outcomes following salvage laryngectomy remains an area of debate among head and neck surgeons. Objective: To investigate the association of salvage laryngectomy closure technique with early postoperative and functional outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients from 17 academic, tertiary care centers who underwent total laryngectomy with no or limited pharyngectomy after completing a course of definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients with defects not amenable to primary closure were excluded. Data were analyzed from February 14, 2021, to January 29, 2024. Exposures: Total laryngectomy with and without limited pharyngectomy, reconstructed by primary mucosal closure (PC), regional closure (RC), or free tissue transfer (FTT). Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were stratified on the basis of the pharyngeal closure technique. Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes were evaluated with bivariate analyses. A multivariable regression model adjusted for historical risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) was used to assess risk associated with closure technique. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were determined. Results: The study included 309 patients (256 [82.8%] male; mean age, 64.7 [range, 58.0-72.0] years). Defects were reconstructed as follows: FTT (161 patients [52.1%]), RC (64 [20.7%]), and PC (84 [27.2%]). A PCF was noted in 36 of 161 patients in the FTT group (22.4%), 25 of 64 in the RC group (39.1%), and 29 of 84 in the PC group (34.5%). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing PC or RC had a higher risk of PCF compared with those undergoing FTT (PC: RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.4]; RC: RR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.3-4.8]). Undergoing FTT was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of PCF (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; number needed to treat, 7). Subgroup analysis comparing inset techniques for the RC group showed a higher risk of PCF associated with PC (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and predominately pectoralis myofascial flap with onlay technique (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2), but there was no association of pectoralis myocutaneous flap with cutaneous paddle interposition with PCF (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8) compared with FTT with cutaneous inset. There were no clinically significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups. Conclusion and Relevance: In this study of patients with limited pharyngeal defects, interpositional fasciocutaneous closure technique was associated with reduced risk of PCF in the salvage setting, which is most commonly achieved by FTT in academic practices. Closure technique was not associated with functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area.

PURPOSE: To analyze oncological outcomes of endoscopic surgical treatment of locally recurrent EBV-related undifferentiated non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (uNK-NPC) in a non-endemic area. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients affected by recurrent uNK-NPC treated with nasopharyngeal endoscopic resection (NER) in a tertiary-care referral center from 2003 to 2022, by evaluating survival rates, prognostic factors, and follow-up strategies. RESULTS: The oncological outcomes of 41 patients were analyzed, over a mean follow-up period of 57 months. The 5-year overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival of the cohort were 60.7% ± 8.9%, 69% ± 9%, and 39.7% ± 9.2%, respectively. The local (rT) and regional (rN) extension of recurrent disease, stage of disease, and status of resection margins appeared to significantly influence survivals. After a mean follow-up period of 21 months, a further recurrence after NER was observed in 36.6% of cases. Skull base osteonecrosis induced by previous irradiation and post-surgical bone remodeling represent the major challenges for early detection of further local relapses during postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: NER appeared as a safe and effective treatment for recurrent uNK-NPC. The adequate selection of patients eligible for NER is essential, to maximize the chances to cure and minimize the risk of local complications.

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap for the laryngopharyngectomy defect.

BACKGROUND: Partial or total laryngopharyngectomy defects have traditionally been reconstructed using the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, or jejunal free flaps. The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap (LDMFF) is an option for high-risk patients with complex laryngopharyngeal ± cutaneous neck defects. METHODS: Retrospective single-surgeon case series from 2017 to 2022. Outcomes were assessed at both the back donor site and head and neck. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were identified. Flap survival was 100%. There was 1 (4.2%) pharyngocutaneous fistula and 2 (8.3%) tracheo-esophageal peristomal fistulas. At last follow-up, 17 (71%) were sustaining weight on oral intake, and 7 (29%) were G-tube dependent with 4 of these able to do some type of oral intake. Seven (29.2%) had post-operative stricture/stenosis requiring dilation. There were only minor donor site complications, all managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The LDMFF can be a robust reconstructive option, particularly for radiated high-risk patients with complex pharyngeal defects, including skin.

The Ischemic Tolerance up to Four Hours of Free Jejunum Flap: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: While free jejunum transfer (FJT) following total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) is a reliable reconstruction technique, the jejunum flap is viewed as more susceptible to ischemia than a standard free flap. Animal studies have indicated that the jejunum can tolerate ischemia for as little as 2 to 3 hours. Clinical studies also reported increased complications after the FJT with more than 3 hours of ischemia. Traditionally, our institution has carried out FJT with an initial intestinal anastomosis, followed by a vascular anastomosis, which often results in extended jejunal ischemia time. In this study, we retrospectively examined the actual tolerance of the jejunum to ischemia, considering perioperative complications and postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 402 consecutive cases involving TPLE + FJT. Patients were divided into five groups based on jejunum ischemia time (∼119 minutes, 120∼149 minutes, 150∼179 minutes, 180∼209 minutes, 210 minutes∼), with each variable and result item compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent factors influencing the four results: three perioperative complications (pedicle thrombosis, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection) and dysphagia at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean jejunal ischemia time was 164.6 ± 28.4 (90-259) minutes. When comparing groups divided by jejunal ischemia time, we found no significant differences in overall outcomes or complications. Our multivariate analyses indicated that jejunal ischemia time did not impact the three perioperative complications and postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSION: In TPLE + FJT, a jejunal ischemia time of up to 4 hours had no effect on perioperative complications or postoperative dysphagia. The TPLE + FJT technique, involving a jejunal anastomosis first followed by vascular anastomosis, benefits from an easier jejunal anastomosis but suffers from a longer jejunal ischemia time. However, we found that ischemia time does not pose significant problems, although we have not evaluated the effects of jejunal ischemia extending beyond 4 hours.

Institutional experience with total pharyngectomy reconstruction: Exploring the role of the salivary bypass tube.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the effectiveness of salivary bypass tubes during total pharyngectomy reconstruction to prevent pharyngocutaneous fistula or pharyngoesophageal stricture. METHODS: Our study examined tubed free flap reconstruction outcomes for total pharyngectomy defects over 11 years at a single tertiary referral center. We compared postoperative fistula and stricture rates between two groups: those with salivary bypass tubes inserted during reconstruction and those without. RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 26 had radial forearm, and 10 had anterolateral thigh free flap reconstruction. 53% received salivary bypass tubes. However, the tubes did not significantly reduce the relative risks of fistula or stricture. Notably, neck dissection during total pharyngectomy was associated with increased fistula incidence. Minor salivary bypass tube-related complications affected 21% of subjects. CONCLUSION: The role of salivary bypass tubes in total pharyngectomy reconstruction remains uncertain.

Partial pharyngolaryngectomy with free flap for an unusual pharyngeal stenosis: surgical experience and literature review.

This report describes the case of a middle-aged man who attempted suicide, which resulted in laryngeal webbing and pharyngeal stenosis. The patient was compromised at the level of respiration, necessitating a tracheostomy. Alimentation was also affected, and feeding was done through a gastrostomy tube. Unfortunately, the fibrous tissues were resistant to dilatation and laser treatment. Hence, he underwent a modified partial horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy (PHSL) and pharyngectomy to excise all of the fibrous tissues formed after the incident. The resulting defect was closed with a radial forearm flap (RFF), which is an innovative means of reconstruction after PHSL. The postoperative results were satisfactory. The patient could achieve full oral intake without aspiration at 10 days and the cannula was removed at 3 weeks. This surgical technique could be applied in supraglottic cancers with extension to the pharynx, with repair of the defect by RFF, thus preserving the function of the larynx.

Cervical Osteomyelitis and Diskitis as a Complication of Neopharyngeal Breakdown: A Multisite Case Series Review.

Laryngectomy and pharyngectomy are surgical options for advanced laryngeal or pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cervical osteomyelitis-diskitis, occurring when there is dehiscence of the posterior neopharyngeal wall, is an uncommon complication of laryngopharyngectomy. This case series describes imaging findings of pharyngoesophageal wall breakdown with subsequent cervical spine infection and demonstrates that most of these patients had undergone prior esophageal or neopharyngeal dilations for benign posttreatment stricture. Neck pain, fever, or serologic evidence of infection should prompt careful evaluation for osteomyelitis-diskitis and assessment for neopharyngeal breakdown and sinus tract formation, especially in the postdilation setting.

Long-term surgical and functional outcomes after anterolateral thigh flap and free jejunal transfer reconstruction of circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects.

BACKGROUND: Circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects resulting from total pharyngolaryngectomy are commonly reconstructed using free jejunal (FJ) transfer or an anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 92 patients with ALT free flaps and 140 who underwent FJ transfer between 2009 and 2022, and compared their surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Total flap loss occurred in two (2%) and five (4%) patients in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively. Fistula rates were 5% in both groups. Stricture rates were 21% and 5% in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively (p < 0.01). At the 5-year follow-up evaluation, intelligible speech was achieved by 83% and 28% of patients (p < 0.01) in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Each reconstructive method can be further optimized by proficient surgeons with expertise in the available methods and by considering patient-specific factors and available evidence.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Larynx-Preserving Open Partial Pharyngectomy and Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Adjustments.

BACKGROUND: There is a group of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) patients for whom larynx-preserving open partial pharyngectomy (PP) and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) are indicated. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival difference as there is no evidence directly comparing the two therapies. METHODS: This study evaluated HPSCC patients who were initially treated by PP or RT/CRT at our institution between January 2007 and October 2019. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were evaluated. The main analyses were performed with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustments. Sensitivity analyses compared hazard ratios (HRs) obtained with three models: unadjusted, multivariate Cox regression, and propensity score-adjusted. RESULTS: Overall, 198 patients were enrolled; 63 and 135 underwent PP and RT/CRT, respectively. IPTW-adjusted 5-year OS, DSS, LFS, and LRFS rates in the PP and RT/CRT groups were 84.3% and 61.9% (p = 0.019), 84.9% and 75.8% (p = 0.168), 94.8% and 90.0% (p = 0.010), and 75.9% and 74.1% (p = 0.789), respectively. In the IPTW-adjusted regression analysis, PP was associated with a significant benefit regarding OS (HR 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.90) and LFS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.77). The results obtained with the three models in the sensitivity analyses were qualitatively similar to those of the IPTW-adjusted models. CONCLUSION: Despite the risk of bias related to unadjusted factors, our results suggest that PP is associated with significantly better OS and LFS compared with RT/CRT for HPSCC.

Swallowing outcomes over time after total pharyngolaryngectomy and free flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges after total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is to restore the swallowing function. The aim of this study was to compare swallowing outcomes between patients who underwent reconstruction with jejunum free flap (JFF) and other free flaps (OFFs). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent TPL and free flap reconstruction. The endpoints were the evolution of swallowing outcomes during the first five years after treatment assessed by the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and outcomes associated with complications. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients were included, 84 patients in the JFF group and 27 in the OFF group. The patients in the OFF group experienced more chronic pharyngostoma (p = 0.001) and pharyngoesophageal stricture (p = 0.008). During the first year, a lower FOIS score tended to be associated with OFF (p = 0.137), and this result remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that JFF reconstruction provides better swallowing outcomes than OFF reconstruction, stable over time.

Complications of pectoralis major myo-cutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh flap and radial forearm free flap after total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding the most effective reconstruction after total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy (TLwPP). This study aims to compare different reconstructive techniques (pectoralis major myo-cutaneous flap, PMMCF; anterolateral thigh flap, ALTF; radial forearm free flap, RFFF) after TLwPP in terms of pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF), stenosis and feeding tube dependence (FTD) incidence. METHODS: The Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed for PCF incidence, stenosis incidence, and FTD incidence on the entire cohort. An arm-based network analysis was conducted to compare three different surgical interventions (PMMCF, ALTF, RFFF). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 232 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The lowest PCF absolute risk was measured for the RFFF (11.7%, 95% CI: 2.8%-33.4%), compared to the ALTF (13.4%, 95% CI: 4.5%-32.1%) and the PMMC (49.0%, 95% CI: 19.2%-79.3%). The RFFF showed a stenosis absolute risk of 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.1%), while a higher stenosis incidence was measured for the ALTF (5.7%, 95% CI: 0.8%-25.2%) and the PMMCF (11.6%, 95% CI: 0.8%-55.1%). The RFFF showed the lowest absolute risk of FTD incidence (6.8%, 95% CI: 0.5%-28.1%) compared to the other reconstructive techniques (PMMCF: 12.4%, 95% CI: 2.4%-42.1%; ALTF: 17.5%, 95% CI: 6.4%-38.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The RFFF seems the best choice for reconstruction of partial pharyngeal defects after TLwPP due to the lower incidence of PCF, stenosis and FTD compared to the ALTF and the PMMCF.