RESUMEN
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration approved Narcan, a nasal spray formulation of naloxone, for sale as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication in March 2023. The purpose of OTC approval was to improve naloxone accessibility to reduce opioid overdoses; however, research has not yet evaluated whether naloxone's availability and cost changed since this policy was implemented. Objective: To evaluate whether the accessibility and cost of naloxone at North Carolina community pharmacies changed after OTC naloxone became available and whether cost and availability varied by pharmacy type and urbanicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal telephone-based secret shopper survey study included a stratified sample of 202 North Carolina community pharmacies, including health department, independent, and chain pharmacies. There were 2 separate data collection efforts from March to April 2023 (before OTC naloxone could be sold at pharmacies) and November 2023 to January 2024 (after OTC naloxone was sold at pharmacies). Exposure: OTC naloxone first became available for sale at community pharmacies in September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were same-day availability of naloxone without a clinician-issued prescription and the quoted out-of-pocket cost for cash-paying patients. Results: Data were collected from 192 pharmacies. Same-day naloxone availability increased from 42.2% (81 of 192) before OTC naloxone availability to 57.8% (111 of 192) after (P < .001). The mean (SD) quoted out-of-pocket cost decreased from $90.93 ($42.6) pre-OTC availability to $62.67 ($41.0) post-OTC availability (P < .001). Independent pharmacies had higher mean (SD) costs than chain pharmacies in both the pre-OTC phase ($109.47 [$37.90] vs $86.40 [$35.70]; P < .001) and post-OTC phase ($77.59 [$38.90] vs $57.74 [$35.90]; P = .004). Out-of-pocket costs did not differ by urbanicity in the pre-OTC phase; however, mean (SD) costs were higher at suburban ($88.67 [$66.80]) and rural ($65.43 [$35.00]) pharmacies compared with urban pharmacies ($53.58 [$29.00]) in the post-OTC phase (P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: The Food and Drug Administration's approval of OTC naloxone nasal spray contributed to an increase in pharmacy-based availability of naloxone and a reduction of its cost for cash-paying patients. Cost was higher at independent pharmacies compared with chain pharmacies and lower in urban pharmacies compared with suburban and rural pharmacies.
Asunto(s)
Naloxona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Naloxona/economía , Naloxona/provisión & distribución , Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/economía , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/provisión & distribución , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/economía , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/provisión & distribución , North Carolina , Estudios Longitudinales , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Germany, over-the-counter (OTC) medicines may only be dispensed by community pharmacies (CPs). German CPs must ensure 'adequate' counselling, including the cost of medicines. Along with information gathering and advice giving as classic aspects of counselling, the aim was also to investigate counselling indicators of product and price transparency. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was based on the covert simulated patient (SP) methodology and was conducted in a random sample of CPs stratified by districts in the major German city of Munich. Each of the 178 selected CPs was visited once by one of five trained female students. They simulated a symptom-based sub-scenario 1 with a request for an OTC medicine for a headache and a sub-scenario 2 with standardised information regarding product and price transparency. The assessment, completed immediately postvisit by the SPs, included a total of 23 items. RESULTS: All 178 scheduled visits were completed successfully. The median counselling score with the classic items was 3.0 out of 12 points (interquartile range [IQR] 4.25) and when expanded by items for product and price transparency the score was 4.0 out of 14 points (IQR 4.00). A selection of medicines was offered unsolicited in 38.2% of the visits and in 5.6% of the visits voluntary price information was provided before the transaction. A request for a cheaper medicine led to a significant price reduction (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; p < 0.001, r = 0.869). CONCLUSION: Due to the below-average level of counselling, the regional chambers of pharmacists are recommended to initiate measures for improvement. There is also potential for optimisation with regard to product and price transparency as an important extension of the classic counselling aspects. It is therefore recommended that the government raise customers' awareness of the cost of medicines.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Consejo , Cefalea , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Simulación de Paciente , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/economía , Humanos , Alemania , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Adulto , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Farmacias/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Affordability of medicines is key for effective healthcare. Thus, we compared medicine prices using International Dollar (I$), which allows confronting the values of different currencies. Besides, we intended to verify if pharmaceutical market deregulation leads to lower medicines prices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the study between December 2019 and September 2022 collecting data from 21 countries. From the preliminary sampling of 30 medicines, we selected 10 brand names (5 Rx and 5 OTC brands) for the analysis. In each country, we collected price information from 3 pharmacies and then converted them to the I$ using the rates published by the International Monetary Fund. RESULTS: There were differences between regulated and deregulated markets in prices presented in I$. For instance, Aspirin C® (10 soluble pills) was on average I$ 5.41 in Finland (regulated market) and I$ 13.25 in Brazil. The most expensive Xarelto® 20 x 28 pills (I$ 538.40) was in Romania, which in the case of other medicines, was in the group of cheaper countries. There was no statistical significance in price comparison between regulated and deregulated markets. In some cases, however, regulated markets offered lower prices of the same medicine than deregulated markets. CONCLUSION: The analysis revealed differences in I$ prices between countries. Pharmaceutical market regulation does not mean higher prices of medicines. There is a need for affordable medicines. Hence, decision-makers should work on the medicines prices and adjust them to the local economies. I$ could be important in creating pharmaceuticals prices, and the conducted study should encourage other researchers to present their results using this currency.
Asunto(s)
Comercio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Humanos , Comercio/economía , Internacionalidad , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Farmacias/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-priced drugs pose a challenge for health budgets, policies, and patient safety. One of the key roles of community pharmacies is to ensure availability to prescription drugs regardless of their price. This has been identified as challenging in certain situations concerning high-priced drugs. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to investigate the views of proprietary pharmacists regarding the effects of high-priced drugs on the day-to-day operations of pharmacies. METHODS: The data collection of the study was performed as a national cross-sectional online survey. The inclusion criteria were being a proprietary pharmacist and a member of the Association of Finnish Pharmacies. The survey contained questions yielding both quantitative and qualitative answers. The study focused on the qualitative data which was analysed by deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In total 604 proprietary pharmacists were sent the survey, and 174 eligible answers were included in the study, giving a response rate of 29%. The result describes the relationships between the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development based on a framework by Wanamaker, with respect to high-priced drugs and community pharmacy operations as viewed by proprietary pharmacists. The main findings of the study show that proprietary pharmacists find the implementation of real-time reimbursement payments, a further reform of the pharmacy tax, and the abolishment of return bans to the wholesaler as risk mitigations and means to attain sustainability with respect to high-priced drugs and pharmacy practice. They experience that these changes would diminish high-priced drugs unnecessarily ending up as medical waste and improve the working conditions of the pharmacy staff by alleviating stress. CONCLUSIONS: According to the respondents, high-priced drugs pose challenges for community pharmacies and the legislation and reimbursement system need to adapt to these challenges. If not, community pharmacies in Finland continue to face severe financial declines based on the study results.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Farmacéuticos , Finlandia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Femenino , Costos de los Medicamentos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
This Viewpoint discusses challenges pharmacies may face under the Inflation Reduction Act and steps that can be taken to prevent unintended consequences.
Asunto(s)
Farmacias , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Comercio/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The dispensation of medicines in some low- and middle-income countries is often carried out by private vendors operating under constrained conditions. The aim of this study was to understand the challenges reported by employees of dispensaries, specifically, chemical and herbal shops and pharmacies in Accra, Ghana. Our objectives were twofold: (1) to assess challenges faced by medicine vendors related to dispensing antimicrobials (antibiotic and antimalarial medications), and (2) to identify opportunities for improving their stewardship of antimicrobials. METHODS: Data were collected in 79 dispensaries throughout Accra, in 2021, using a survey questionnaire. We used open-ended questions, grounded on an adapted socioecological model of public health, to analyze these data and determine challenges faced by respondents. RESULTS: We identified multiple, interlocking challenges faced by medicine vendors. Many of these relate to challenges of antimicrobial stewardship (following evidence-based practices when dispensing medicines). Overall, medicine vendors frequently reported challenges at the Customer and Community levels. These included strained interactions with customers and the prohibitive costs of medications. The consequences of these challenges reverberated and manifested through all levels of the socioecological model of public health (Entity, Customer, Community, Global). DISCUSSION: The safe and effective distribution of medications was truncated by strained interactions, often related to the cost of medicines and gaps in knowledge. While addressing these challenges requires multifaceted approaches, we identified several areas that, if intervened upon, could unlock the great potential of antimicrobal stewardship. The effective and efficient implementation of key interventions could facilitate efforts spearheaded by medicine vendors and leverage the benefits of their role as health educators and service providers. CONCLUSION: Addressing barriers faced by medicine vendors would provide an opportunity to significantly improve the provision of medications, and ultimately population health. Such efforts will likely expand access to populations who may otherwise be unable to access medications and treatment in formal institutions of care such as hospitals. Our findings also highlight the broad range of care provided by shopkeepers and vendors at dispensaries. These findings suggest that the meaningful engagement of dispensaries as valued conduits of community health is a promising pathway for interventions aiming to improve antimicrobial stewardship.
Asunto(s)
Farmacias , Ghana , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Comercio , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/provisión & distribución , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Antimaláricos/economía , Antimaláricos/provisión & distribución , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacies sell generic prescription drugs, often at lower prices than traditional retail pharmacies; however, not all drugs are available, and prices vary. OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability and cost of generic drugs at DTC pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Five national DTC pharmacies in April and May 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Each qualifying form of 100 generic drugs with the highest cost-per-patient (expensive) and the 50 generic drugs with the highest number of patients (common) in Medicare Part D in 2020 MAIN MEASURES: Availability of these drugs and the lowest DTC pharmacy price for a standardized drug strength and supply (e.g., 30 pills), compared to GoodRx retail pharmacy prices. KEY RESULTS: Of the 118 expensive generic dosage forms, 94 (80%) were available at 1 or more DTC pharmacies; out of 52 common generic dosage forms, 51 (98%) were available (p < 0.001). Of the 88 expensive generics available in comparable quantities and strengths across pharmacies, 42 (47%) had the lowest cost at Amazon, 23 (26%) at Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company, 13 (14%) at Health Warehouse, and 12 (13%) at Costco; for 51 common generic formulations, 16 (31%) had the lowest cost at Costco, 14 (27%) at Amazon, 10 (20%) at Walmart, 6 (12%) at Health Warehouse, and 5 (10%) at Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. For the 77 expensive generics with available GoodRx retail pharmacy prices, the median cost savings at DTC pharmacies were $231 (95% CI, $129-$792) or 76% (IQR, 53-91%); for 51 common generics, savings were $19 (95% CI, $10-$34) or 75% (IQR, 67-83%). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the most expensive generic drugs are unavailable at direct-to-consumer pharmacies. Meanwhile, less expensive, commonly used generics are widely available, but drug prices vary by pharmacy and savings are modest, requiring patients to shop around for the lowest cost.
Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Estudios Transversales , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Humanos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: According to a standing order in North Carolina (NC), naloxone can be purchased without a provider prescription. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine whether same-day naloxone accessibility and cost vary by pharmacy type and rurality in NC. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone audit of 202 NC community pharmacies stratified by pharmacy type and county of origin was conducted in March and April 2023. Trained "secret shoppers" enacted a standardized script and recorded whether naloxone was available and its cost. We examined the relationship between out-of-pocket naloxone cost, pharmacy type, and rurality. RESULTS: Naloxone could be purchased in 53% of the pharmacies contacted; 26% incorrectly noting that naloxone could be filled only with a provider prescription and 21% did not sell naloxone. Naloxone availability by standing order was statistically different by pharmacy type (chain/independent) (χ2 = 20.58, df = 4, P value < 0.001), with a higher frequency of willingness to dispense according to the standing order by chain pharmacies in comparison to independent pharmacies. The average quoted cost for naloxone nasal spray at chain pharmacies was $84.69; the cost was significantly more ($113.54; P < 0.001) at independent pharmacies. Naloxone cost did not significantly differ by pharmacy rurality (F2,136 = 2.38, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of NC community pharmacies audited dispense naloxone according to the statewide standing order, limiting same-day access to this life-saving medication. Costs were higher at independent pharmacies, which could be due to store-level policies. Future studies should further investigate these cost differences, especially as intranasal naloxone transitions from a prescription only to over-the-counter product.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Naloxona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Naloxona/provisión & distribución , Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Naloxona/economía , North Carolina , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/economía , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/provisión & distribución , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Órdenes Permanentes , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This study examines mean yearly out-of-pocket cost for naloxone dispensed from retail pharmacies by payer between 2018 and 2022 and by prescription characteristics and payer in 2022.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Gastos en Salud , Naloxona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Farmacias , Humanos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/economía , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Naloxona/economía , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/economía , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/tendencias , Farmacia/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This study evaluates whether organizations that offer Medicare Part D plans (referred to as Part D sponsors) overpay pharmacies for generic drugs.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Genéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Medicare Part D , Farmacias , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicare Part D/economía , Farmacias/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Estados Unidos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economíaAsunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Farmacia , Humanos , Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacia/organización & administración , Gobierno FederalRESUMEN
The essential medicine--insulin cannot be easily accessed and afforded in many countries. To help address this issue, we evaluated the availability, affordability and price of insulin products in Nanjing, eastern China. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in 2016 and 2018. A total of 56 hospital pharmacies were sampled, using a simplified and adapted World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Prices were expressed as Median Price Ratios (MPRs) to Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) prices. In addition, we investigated the price components of seven selected insulin products as a case study before and after the Online Centralized Procurement Policy for Hospital Drugs in May, 2018. Affordability was presented as the number of daily wages of the lowest paid unskilled government worker (LPGW) required to purchase 1000IU of insulin based on the average courses of treatment, approximately 30 days' treatment. The availability of insulin products was very high in secondary hospitals and tertiary hospitals both in 2016 and 2018, but in community hospitals was very low. In 2018, the availability of prandial insulin products showed fluctuation compared to 2016. The availability of pre-mixed human insulin products was over 95% overall, and also very high (80%) in community hospitals in 2018. The prices of insulin products were much lower than PBS prices of Australian in this study, with the MPRs less than 1 (0.32 to 0.71 in 2016 vs. 0.30 to 0.68 in 2018) for all insulin types. But insulin products in Nanjing in 2016 and 2018 were considered unaffordable, because the number of daily wages of the LPGW needed to purchase for the 30 days treatment of insulin products ranged from 2.26 to 8.49 in 2016 and 1.88 to 7.09 in 2018. The manufacturers' selling price contributed the main part (74.15% to 77.70% before and 74.86% to 91.51% after the implementation of the bidding policy) of the price components of target insulin brands. The availability of insulin products was high in secondary hospitals and tertiary hospitals, but lower in community hospitals. However, the affordability in community hospitals was better than other hospitals, but the insulin products were still unaffordable for patients on low incomes. Further improvements of the availability accessibility and affordability of medicines in advancing health insurance policies and lowering drug prices should be put forward.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Esenciales/economía , Insulina/uso terapéutico , China/epidemiología , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Política de Salud/economía , Humanos , Insulina/síntesis química , Insulina/economía , Farmacias/economía , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Público/economía , Organización Mundial de la Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders during COVID-19 have accelerated the adoption of remote and virtual care (RVC) models, potentially including telehealth, telemedicine, and internet-based electronic physician visits (e-visits) for remote consultation, diagnosis, and care, deterring small health care businesses including clinics, physician offices, and pharmacies from aligning resources and operations to new RVC realities. Current perceptions of small health care businesses toward remote care, particularly perceptions of whether RVC adoption will synergistically improve business sustainability, would highlight the pros and cons of rapidly adopting RVC technology among policy makers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the perceptions of small health care businesses regarding the impact of RVC on their business sustainability during COVID-19, gauge their perceptions of their current levels of adoption of and satisfaction with RVC models and analyze how well that aligns with their perceptions of the current business scenario (SCBS), and determine whether these perceptions influence their view of their midterm sustainability (SUST). METHODS: We randomly sampled small clinics, physician offices, and pharmacies across Colorado and sought assistance from a consulting firm to collect survey data in July 2020. Focal estimated study effects were compared across the three groups of small businesses to draw several insights. RESULTS: In total, 270 respondents, including 82 clinics, 99 small physician offices, and 89 pharmacies, across Colorado were included. SRVC and SCBS had direct, significant, and positive effects on SUST. However, we investigated the effect of the interaction between SRVC and SCBS to determine whether RVC adoption aligns with their perceptions of the current business scenario and whether this interaction impacts their perception of business sustainability. Effects differed among the three groups. The interaction term SRVC×SCBS was significant and positive for clinics (P=.02), significant and negative for physician offices (P=.05), and not significant for pharmacies (P=.76). These variations indicate that while clinics positively perceived RVC alignment with the current business scenario, the opposite held true for small physician offices. CONCLUSIONS: As COVID-19 continues to spread worldwide and RVC adoption progresses rapidly, it is critical to understand the impact of RVC on small health care businesses and their perceptions of long-term survival. Small physician practices cannot harness RVC developments and, in contrast with clinics, consider it incompatible with business survival during and after COVID-19. If small health care firms cannot compete with RVC (or synergistically integrate RVC platforms into their current business practices) and eventually become nonoperational, the resulting damage to traditional health care services may be severe, particularly for critical care delivery and other important services that RVC cannot effectively replace. Our results have implications for public policy decisions such as incentive-aligned models, policy-initiated incentives, and payer-based strategies for improved alignment between RVC and existing models.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Farmacias/economía , Consultorios Médicos/economía , Pequeña Empresa/economía , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Colorado/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research on socio-ecological factors that may impede or facilitate access to naloxone in pharmacies remains limited. This study investigated associations between socio-ecological factors, pharmacy participation in the naloxone cost assistance program (NCAP), pharmacy characteristics and having naloxone in stock among pharmacies in New York City. METHODS: Phone interviews were conducted with 662 pharmacies selected from the New York City Naloxone Standing Order List. Multi-level generalized linear modeling estimated associations between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition, poverty rates, overdose fatality rates, pharmacy participation in N-CAP, having private physical spaces within the pharmacy, knowledge of where to refer people to obtain naloxone and adjusted relative risk (aRR) that the pharmacy would have naloxone in stock. RESULTS: Findings from this study supported several of the hypotheses. Greater neighborhood poverty was associated with a lower likelihood of carrying naloxone compared to neighborhoods with less poverty (aRR = .79, CI95 % = .69, .90, p < .001). Pharmacies that provided a private window for consultations (aRR = 1.34, CI95 % = 1.19, 1.51, p < .001), a private room (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001), and a private area (aRR = 1.42, CI95 % = 1.30, 1.56, p < .001) were associated with a higher likelihood of carrying naloxone compared than those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that community-level socioeconomic marginalization is a contributor to disparities in naloxone availability among pharmacies in New York City. Findings support harm reduction interventions tailored to the built environment of pharmacies that respect privacy to those seeking naloxone.
Asunto(s)
Naloxona/economía , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Farmacias/economía , Sobredosis de Droga , Etnicidad , Femenino , Reducción del Daño , Humanos , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York , Farmacia , Grupos Raciales , Características de la Residencia , Órdenes Permanentes , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To measure the situation of the non-prescription sale of antibiotics and the service quality of community pharmacies in Guangzhou, China. METHODS: A simulated client method was conducted to estimate the non-prescription sale of antibiotics and service quality based on scenarios about adult acute upper respiratory tract infection in 2019. A total of 595 community pharmacies from 11 districts were investigated in Guangzhou, China. We used binary logistic regression to evaluate the factors associated with the non-prescription sale of antibiotics. RESULTS: The proportion of non-prescription dispensing of antibiotics was 63.1% in Guangzhou, China, with a higher incidence of antibiotic dispensing without prescription in outer districts (69.3%). Cephalosporin (44.1%) and Amoxicillin (39.0%) were sold more often than other antibiotics. Chain pharmacies had better performance on the prescription sale of antibiotics and service quality. Traditional Chinese medicine was commonly recommended by pharmacy staff. CONCLUSION: Since the non-prescription sale of antibiotics is prevalent in Guangzhou, effective solutions should be determined. Strengthened public awareness and regulatory system innovation are needed.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/tendencias , Farmacias/tendencias , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , China/epidemiología , Comercio , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Farmacéuticos/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Policymakers have recognized that proprietary patent medicine vendors (PPMVs) can provide an opportunity for effective scaling up of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) since they constitute a major source of malaria treatment in Nigeria. This study was designed to determine the stocking pattern for anti-malarial medications, knowledge of the recommended anti-malarial medicine among PPMVs in Akinyele Local Government Area (LGA) of Oyo State, Nigeria and their perception on ways to improve PPMV adherence to stocking ACT medicines. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 320 PPMVs using a mixed method of data collection. Survey respondents were consecutively selected as a complete listing of all the PPMVs was not available. A pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data and two focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted among PPMVs using a pretested FGD guide. RESULTS: Most PPMVs stocked artemether-lumefantrine (90.9%), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (5.3%) and artesunate-amodiaquine (2.8%). Drugs contrary to the policy, which included sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, chloroquine, quinine, halofantrine, artesunate, and artemether were stocked by 93.8, 22.8, 0.6, 1.3, 6.6, and 7.8% of the PPMVs, respectively. Most PPMVs (96.3%) had good knowledge of artemether-lumefantrine as the first-line treatment for malaria and 2.8% had good knowledge of artesunate-amodiaquine as the alternate treatment for malaria. The major factors influencing stocking decision were government recommendations (41.3%) and consumer demand (40.30%). CONCLUSION: Stocking of artemisinin-based combinations was high among PPMVs, although they also stocked and dispensed other anti-malarial drugs and this has serious implications for drug resistance development. The PPMVs had considerable knowledge of the recommended treatment for uncomplicated malaria and stocking decisions were overwhelmingly driven by consumer demand. However, there is a need for more enlightenment on discontinuation of government-banned anti-malarial drugs.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/economía , Combinación de Medicamentos , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/economía , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Nigeria , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/provisión & distribución , Farmacias/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Access to affordable and good quality medicines is a key to meeting Sustainable Development Goal No. 3 by the year 2030. Prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines have been studied in many developing countries, but no such information has been published about Rwanda yet. This study aimed at providing data on prices, availability and affordability of medicines in different health facilities of Rwanda. METHODS: A survey was carried out on availability, prices and affordability of 18 medicines in Kigali City and five districts of Rwanda. 44 health facilities were surveyed, including public and faith-based hospitals, public and faith-based health centers and private pharmacies. The standardized methodology developed by WHO and Health Action International (HAI) was used to collect and analyze the data. FINDINGS: Prices for generic medicines in public and faith-based health facilities were remarkably low, with median price ratios (MPRs) of 1.0 in comparison to the international procurement prices published by Management Sciences for Health. In private pharmacies, prices were twice as high (MPR = 1.99 for generics). Availability of medicines fell short of the of 80% target set by WHO, but was better than reported from many other developing countries. Availability of medicines was highest in the private sector (71.3%) and slightly lower in the faith-based (62.8%) and public (59.6%) sectors. The government procurement agency was found to work efficiently, achieving prices 30% below the international procurement price given in the International Medical Product Price Guide. Affordability of medicines was better in the public and faith-based sectors than in the private sector. CONCLUSION: In Rwanda, medicines are affordable but poorly available in both the public and the faith-based sectors. Further improvements of the availability of medicines in the public and the faith-based health facilities represent the most important key to increase accessibility and affordability of medicines in Rwanda.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Esenciales/economía , Salud Global , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Medicamentos Esenciales/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Sector Privado , Sector Público/tendencias , Rwanda/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Even though evidence-based diabetes prevention interventions exist, more than 1 in 3 Americans have prediabetes; the use of pharmacies has been explored as a way to reach and care for this population. The objective of this study was to analyze factors that influence adoption of type 2 diabetes prevention programs by community pharmacies. METHODS: We conducted 21 semistructured interviews in 2018 with decision makers from 11 independent pharmacies in 6 US states and the District of Columbia and from 10 chain pharmacies operating in 1 state, multiple states, and nationwide. We identified participants by using purposive sampling. We used qualitative methods to analyze data and conducted interviews until we reached saturation. RESULTS: Multiple themes emerged: 1) initiation of services is more likely if initial financial support is received; 2) patient demand for services, actual or perceived, is paramount; 3) diabetes prevention services often fit within the existing operations of a pharmacy and allow maximum use of resources; 4) customer loyalty is a clearly articulated advantage against competition; and 5) engagement in diabetes prevention affirms an expanded role and the value of pharmacies to serve communities. CONCLUSION: Pharmacies are well situated to deliver diabetes prevention programs to communities. Although considerable opportunity exists for pharmacies to address diabetes prevention, more could be done to reduce barriers to their use.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Farmacias/organización & administración , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Farmacias/economía , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/economía , Rol Profesional , Investigación Cualitativa , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Recently, both the Canadian and provincial governments have instituted policies to reduce manufacturers' prices for generic ($250 million sales annually) and brand name ($1,300 million sales annually) drugs. Both government groups made estimates of the financial magnitude of changes in drug prices, but neither has estimated the impact on retail pharmacies. We used a Cost-Volume-Profit model combined with operational data collected nationally to estimate the national impact of the pricing policy changes on pharmacy gross profits. Results show the average value of gross profits per pharmacy per year was approximately $440,000. It is estimated that the policy changes will lead to a 6.8% reduction in gross profits. Adding reductions in rebates for generic drugs, the pharmacies' reductions in gross profits will be 7.2%. In conclusion, policy-makers often ignore how their pricing changes influence the financial position of pharmacies, even though the impact can be substantial.
Asunto(s)
Farmacias/economía , Formulación de Políticas , Canadá , Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de los Medicamentos , Humanos , Mecanismo de ReembolsoRESUMEN
DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this commentary. The author has nothing to disclose.