Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome for Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: A New Therapy to Treat the Long-Term Lung Sequelae?

To date, more than 100 million people worldwide have recovered from COVID-19. Unfortunately, although the virus is eradicated in such patients, fibrotic irreversible interstitial lung disease (pulmonary fibrosis, PF) is clinically evident. Given the vast numbers of individuals affected, it is urgent to design a strategy to prevent a second wave of late mortality associated with COVID-19 PF as a long-term consequence of such a devastating pandemic. Available antifibrotic therapies, namely nintedanib and pirfenidone, might have a role in attenuating profibrotic pathways in SARS-CoV-2 infection but are not economically sustainable by national health systems and have critical adverse effects. It is our opinion that the mesenchymal stem cell secretome could offer a new therapeutic approach in treating COVID-19 fibrotic lungs through its anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic factors.

Healthcare utilisation and costs in the diagnosis and treatment of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.

There are over 200 interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). In addition to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a percentage of patients with other ILDs also develop progressive fibrosis of the lung during their disease course. Patients with progressive-fibrosing ILDs may show limited response to immunomodulatory therapy, worsening symptoms and lung function and, ultimately, early mortality. There are few data for ILDs that may present a progressive fibrosing phenotype specifically, but we believe the burden and healthcare costs associated with these conditions may be comparable to those reported in IPF. This review discusses the burden of ILDs that may present a progressive fibrosing phenotype and the factors impacting healthcare utilisation.

Disparities in pulmonary fibrosis care in the United States: an analysis from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a disease with high morbidity and mortality. Care for these patients, including lung transplantation, may provide significant benefits, but is resource-intensive and expensive. Disadvantaged patients with IPF may hence be at risk for receiving inferior care. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a database consisting of all hospitalizations from a 20% sample of US hospitals. We identified adults hospitalized with IPF between 1998 and 2011 using ICD-9 codes. We assessed the effect of insurance coverage and socioeconomic status (SES) on lung transplantation, a treatment that may improve survival. We also examined the effect of coverage and SES on mortality, as well as discharge to inpatient rehabilitation and receipt of a lung biopsy, two markers of the intensity of care delivered. We used multiple logistic regression to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 148,877 hospitalizations that met our definition of pulmonary fibrosis. In the main adjusted analyses, hospitalizations of patients with Medicaid (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57) or no insurance (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.72) were less likely to result in a lung transplantation compared to hospitalizations of those with non-Medicaid insurance. Those of lower SES were also less likely to undergo transplantation, while hospitalized patients with Medicaid and the uninsured were less likely to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation or to receive a lung biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized patients with IPF, those with lower SES, Medicaid coverage and without insurance were less likely to receive several clinical interventions.

[Socioeconomic evaluation of the effect of rhDNase on the cost of treating infections of the respiratory tract in patients with cystic fibrosis]. / Sozioökonomische Evaluation des Einflusses von rhDNase auf die Kosten der Behandlung von Infektionen der Atemwege bei Patienten mit zystischer Fibrose.

BACKGROUND: Data from a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical trial on the use of aerosolized recombinant human DNase (rhDNase), known as Pulmozyme produced by Genentech, about the treating of respiratory-tract infections among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), has been used to evaluate possible economic effects by identifying the direct medical costs. To calculate the cost an intention-to-treat approach has been used. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The patients were randomly placed in one of three treatment groups. The first group was treated with a 2.5 mg dose of rhDNase and one dose of placebo daily, the second group with placebo twice a day. The third patient group (treated with a 2.5 mg dose of rhDNase twice a day) was not included in this study. RESULTS: The main measurements of resource utilization of services for treatment of respiratory-tract infections were the number of hospitalizations in the follow-up period of 24 weeks (0.41 rhDNase once daily, 0.56 placebo), the number of total days in hospital (4.9 rhDNase, 6.4 placebo), the number of total days of outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy (2.9 rhDNase, 4.4 placebo), the number of total days of inpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy (4.8 rhDNase, 6.2 placebo), the number of total days of outpatient oral antibiotic therapy (23.5 rhDNase, 25.2 placebo) and the number of total days of inpatient oral antibiotic therapy (0.59 rhDNase, 0.55 placebo). From a health insurance perspective the total direct cost based on a weighted per diem for German CF-centres was 5,879 DM (rhDNase) vs 7,849 DM (placebo) per patient respectively. Costs of antibiotics were estimated using all available information on the consumption of antibiotic drugs revealing 2,954 DM per patient in the rhDNase-group and 4,213 DM in the placebo-group. The large cost differences remain also true in a sensitivity analysis introducing minima and maxima as key factors. CONCLUSION: As a result of this study we conclude that the use of rhDNase in treatment of respiratory-tract infections in patients with cystic fibrosis is cost saving and less burdened for the patients. However, all cost estimates do not include the cost of rhDNase itself, which are DM 9,094 for the period of follow-up.