RESUMEN
Clinical reports suggest that the most effective strategies for managing opioid use disorder comprise a comprehensive treatment program of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. However, the conditions under which these combinations are most effective are not well characterized. This study examined whether the presence of an alternative reinforcer could alter the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration-approved opioid antagonist or agonist medications, as well as the nonopioid flumazenil, in decreasing oxycodone choice self-administration in nonhuman primates. Adult squirrel monkeys (n = 7; four females) responded under concurrent second-order fixed-ratio (FR)-3(FR5:S);TO45s schedules of reinforcement for intravenous oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg) or saline on one lever and 30% sweetened condensed milk or water on the other. Doses of naltrexone (0.00032-1.0 mg/kg), nalbuphine (0.32-10 mg/kg), buprenorphine (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg), methadone (0.32-1.0 mg/kg), or flumazenil (1-3.2 mg/kg) were administered intramuscularly prior to oxycodone self-administration sessions that occurred with either milk or water as the alternative. Naltrexone, a µ-opioid receptor antagonist, was >30-fold more potent when milk was available compared with water and abolished oxycodone intake (injections/session) while concomitantly increasing milk deliveries at the highest dose tested. Pretreatment with the low-efficacy µ-agonist nalbuphine was most effective in the presence of milk compared with water, decreasing oxycodone preference to <50% of control values. The higher efficacy µ-agonists, methadone and buprenorphine, and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil did not appreciably alter the reinforcing potency of oxycodone under either condition. These results suggest that antagonist medications used in combination with alternative reinforcers may be an effective strategy to curtail opioid abuse-related behaviors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Clinical treatment programs for opioid use disorder use a combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. However, the conditions under which these combinations are most effective have not been fully characterized. This study examined whether the effectiveness of µ-opioid medications to decrease oxycodone self-administration is altered in the presence of an alternative reinforcer. The results suggest that alternative reinforcers enhance the effects of antagonist or low-efficacy partial agonists, suggesting they may be a more effective strategy to curtail opioid use.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Oxicodona , Saimiri , Autoadministración , Animales , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Oxicodona/farmacología , Femenino , Masculino , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Naltrexona/farmacología , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Refuerzo en Psicología , Conducta de Elección/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Flumazenil/farmacología , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Nalbufina/farmacología , Nalbufina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The decontamination process for plumage-contaminated wild birds, such as those affected by oil spills, is lengthy and involves manual restraint and manipulation of all body parts. Birds commonly react to this in ways that suggest they are extremely stressed (eg, struggling, vocalizing). We proposed to reduce stress during the wash process using sedation and hypothesized that the use of sedation would not negatively impact survival. Contaminated birds in need of washing were randomly selected to be either sedated (butorphanol 2 mg/kg IM + midazolam 1 mg/kg IM and flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM for reversal) or not sedated at 3 US rehabilitation centers over the course of 1 year. Response to sedation was rated on a scale of 0-4 with 0 as no effect to 4 as excessively sedate. Data such as cloacal temperatures at various time points, lengths of various portions of the wash process, preening behavior in the drying pen, and disposition were collected. No statistical differences were found between sedated and nonsedated birds for any of the data points collected, including survival. There was a significant association between birds with higher cloacal temperatures in the drying pen and with birds held longer in the drying pen with improved survival; however, these findings were unrelated to whether the birds were sedated. Our findings show that sedation with butorphanol 2 mg/ kg IM and midazolam 1 mg/kg IM reversed with flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM can be used during the wash process for wild birds without adverse effects. Careful attention must be given to heat support for all birds while drying to prevent hypothermia.
Asunto(s)
Aves , Butorfanol , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Midazolam , Restricción Física , Animales , Restricción Física/veterinaria , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/farmacología , Midazolam/farmacología , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Descontaminación/métodos , Animales Salvajes , Flumazenil/farmacología , Flumazenil/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The optimal anesthetic agent for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on the recovery profiles remain uncertain. We compared the recovery and hemodynamic parameters between the remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups during RFCA. Patients were randomized into the remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups. The primary outcome measure was the time to eye opening following the discontinuation of anesthetic agents. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, time to discharge from the operating room, intraprocedural hemodynamic variables and postoperative quality outcomes. Fifty-three patients were included in the final analysis (n = 26 in the remimazolam-flumazenil and n = 27 in the propofol group). The time to eye opening was significantly shorter in the remimazolam-flumazenil group compared to the propofol group (median [interquartile range]: 174 [157-216] vs. 353 [230-483] s, P < 0.001). The mean blood pressure and bispectral index were significantly higher in the remimazolam-flumazenil group compared to the propofol group (mean difference [95% CI], 7.2 [1.7-12.7] mmHg and 6 [3-8]; P = 0.011 and < 0.001, respectively), which were within target ranges in both groups. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups. Consequently, remimazolam emerges as a promising anesthetic agent, characterized by rapid recovery and stable hemodynamics, during RFCA of AF.Trial registration: NCT05397886.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Flumazenil , Propofol , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Anestesia General/métodos , Anciano , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Purpose: Remimazolam tosilate is a novel ultrafast-acting benzodiazepine that has a rapid emergence even after continuous infusion when using flumazenil. So far, relatively few articles are still focusing on the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam, especially in day surgery. This study aimed to compare the early postoperative quality of recovery of remimazolam tosilate with flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing day surgery. Patients and Methods: 137 patients scheduled for day surgery were randomly divided into the remimazolam tosilate or propofol group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall recovery assessed with the early postoperative quality of recovery scale (PostopQRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), extubation time, postoperative recovery profiles, and perioperative data were documented. Any adverse events were recorded. Results: The incidence of overall recovery on POD1 was 47.7% in the remimazolam tosilate group and 65.1% in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.06; P = 0.072). In general, the overall recovery of the PostopQRS increased over time, and its interaction between time and group was significant (P = 0.003). Among the five dimensions of PostopQRS, there exist statistical differences between groups including emotional state and cognitive recovery. Upon arrival at the PACU, the remimazolam group was more sedated and took longer to recover to a RASS score similar to propofol. The frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia was similar in both groups (P = 0.119). Despite rapid emergence with remimazolam after flumazenil reversal, re-sedation (10.8%) or somnolence (60%) in the PACU was observed, and the length of PACU stay in patients treated with remimazolam tosilate was longer than that of the propofol (35 min vs 30 min, P<0.001). Conclusion: General anesthesia with remimazolam tosilate in conjunction with flumazenil reversal permits rapid recovery of consciousness in day surgery, but there was a notable occurrence of re-sedation or somnolence observed in PACU.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Propofol , Humanos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anciano , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacología , Flumazenil/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines (BZD) are a class of anxiolytics with varying uses, which primarily act on the GABAA receptor resulting in hyperpolarisation. BZDs are often a difficult drug class to cease once neuroadaptation has occurred; recommendations usually involve gradual dose reductions at variable rates. A growing body of evidence has suggested that low-dose flumazenil, a GABAA receptor antagonist, may be a useful agent to allow for rapid detoxification. AIM: To collect pilot data on the safety and efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous flumazenil to reduce BZD use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving in participants taking above and below the therapeutic maximum diazepam equivalent of 30 mg to inform on sample size for future trials. METHOD: In a randomised double-blinded crossover study design, participants received low-dose flumazenil first (4 mg/24 h for approximately eight days) or placebo first. Groups were divided into those taking < 30 mg diazepam equivalent and ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline. Main outcome measures were percentage reduction in daily diazepam use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving scores from baseline, difference in diazepam use across the placebo first group, and flumazenil related adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were recruited and randomised to flumazenil first (n = 14) and placebo first (n = 14). In participants taking ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline (n = 15), flumazenil significantly reduced diazepam use by 30.5% (p = 0.024) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Low-dose flumazenil may aid in BZD detoxification in participants taking daily diazepam equivalent doses greater than or equal to the therapeutic maximum (≥30 mg) by reducing the need for diazepam.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Flumazenil , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inactivación Metabólica/efectos de los fármacos , Proyectos Piloto , Receptores de GABA-A/metabolismo , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/metabolismoAsunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sobredosis de Droga/fisiopatología , Flumazenil/uso terapéutico , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The estimated annual prevalence of drug use disorders is as high as 3%, underpinning the need to continually develop more effective treatments. Central nervous system dysregulation, contributing to acute and post-withdrawal syndromes, has traditionally been managed with benzodiazepines; however, a small but growing body of data indicate that the GABAA receptor antagonist, flumazenil, may offer some advantages over traditional management. AIM: To review the literature on the safety and efficacy of flumazenil in benzodiazepine use disorders and identify gaps in the literature. METHOD: A systematic method was used to identify randomised control trials. Where randomised control trials existed, non-randomised control trials were included to supplement findings. RESULTS: Eleven flumazenil trials were included with varying doses, frequencies and routes of administration. The evidence for flumazenil alone showed generally a reduction in withdrawal symptoms with the exception of one study where withdrawal symptoms initially increased. Flumazenil plus benzodiazepine tapering was assessed in one randomised control trial and a series of non-randomised control trials. Randomised control trial results showed that flumazenil plus benzodiazepine tapering was superior at reducing withdrawal symptoms compared to benzodiazepine tapering alone and placebo. Flumazenil was associated with no serious adverse events; however there remains a risk of seizures. CONCLUSION: Although flumazenil shows promising efficacy in the management of benzodiazepine use disorders and withdrawal, more randomized control trials are required before a definitive recommendation can be made around its use.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/efectos adversos , Flumazenil/farmacología , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/efectos adversos , Moduladores del GABA/farmacología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of flumazenil infusion in the maintenance of arousal and prevention of development of complications in severe benzodiazepine poisoning. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixty severely poisoned patients (intubated due to loss of consciousness) intoxicated by sole benzodiazepines referred to Loghman Hakim hospital between May 2018 and August 2019 were considered to be included in the current study. All were evaluated for possible contraindications of flumazenil administration. If there were no contraindications, we continued supportive care in one group and supportive care plus flumazenil infusion in the second group. Following response to the stat dose of flumazenil, complications, hospital stay, and outcome were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: A total of 60 benzodiazepine-poisoned patients aged between 16 and 84 years old (37 males and 23 females) were enrolled. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups regarding the period of hospital stay. Need for intubation significantly decreased in the infusion group. None of the patients experienced seizure or dysrhythmia. One patient died in the control group which received only a stat dose of flumazenil. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of flumazenil is safe in benzodiazepine-poisoned patients with appropriate indications. Flumazenil infusion can significantly decrease the need for intubation and subsequent ICU admission. Even though flumazenil is an expensive antidote, its administration may decrease the need for ICU beds in the setting of acute poisoning.
Asunto(s)
Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/toxicidad , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Echium amoenum (EA), a popular medicinal plant in Persian medicine, has anxiolytic, antioxidant, sedative, and anti-inflammatory effects. This study examined whether GABA-ergic signaling is involved in the anxiolytic effects of EA in mice. Sixty BALB/c mice (25-30 g) were divided into six groups (n = 10) as follows: the (I) control group received 10 ml/kg normal saline (NS). In the stress groups, the animals underwent 14 consecutive days of restraint stress (RS), and received following treatments simultaneously; (II) RS + NS; (III) RS + Diaz (Diazepam); (IV) RS + EA; (V) RS + Flu (Flumazenil) + EA; (VI) RS + Flu + Diaz. Behavioral tests including the open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze (EPM) were performed to evaluate anxiety-like behaviors and the effects of the regimens. The plasma level of corticosterone and the hippocampal protein expressions of IL-1ß, TNF-α, CREB, and BDNF, as well as p-GABAA/GABAA ratio, were also assessed. The findings revealed that chronic administration of EA alone produced anxiolytic effects in both behavioral tests, while diazepam alone or in combination with Flu failed to decrease the anxiety-like behaviors. Furthermore, the p-GABAA/GABAA and p-CREB/CREB ratios, and protein levels of BDNF were significantly increased in the EA-received group. On the other hand, plasma corticosterone levels and the hippocampal IL-1ß and TNF-α levels were significantly decreased by EA. However, pre-treatment with GABAA receptors (GABAA Rs) antagonist, Flu, reversed the anxiolytic and molecular effects of EA in the RS-subjected animals. Our findings confirmed that alternation of GABAAR is involved in the effects of EA against RS-induced anxiety-like behaviors, HPA axis activation, and neuroinflammation.
Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/farmacología , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Echium/química , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/farmacología , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Receptores de GABA-A/metabolismo , Animales , Ansiolíticos/administración & dosificación , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Escala de Evaluación de la Conducta , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/metabolismo , Corticosterona/sangre , Proteína de Unión a Elemento de Respuesta al AMP Cíclico/metabolismo , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/farmacología , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Plantas Medicinales/química , Plantas Medicinales/metabolismo , Restricción Física , Estrés Fisiológico/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/metabolismoRESUMEN
Midazolam is commonly used for sedation during procedures because of its relative safety and predictability. Still, some rare undesirable medication reactions have been described. We report a case in which midazolam given before a peripheral nerve block caused acute onset dyskinetic extrapyramidal symptoms. These symptoms ultimately resolved following reversal of the midazolam with flumazenil. Given the widespread and multidisciplinary use of midazolam, practitioners should be aware of the potential for rare adverse reactions and be prepared to manage these scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Flumazenil/uso terapéutico , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Femenino , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
The use of hybrid PET/MR imaging facilitates the simultaneous investigation of challenge-related changes in ligand binding to neuroreceptors using PET, while concurrently measuring neuroactivation or blood flow with MRI. Having attained a steady state of the PET radiotracer using a bolus-infusion protocol, it is possible to observe alterations in ligand neuroreceptor binding through changes in distribution volumes. Here, we present an iterative procedure for establishing an administration scheme to obtain steady state [11C]flumazenil concentrations in grey matter in the human brain. In order to achieve a steady state in the shortest possible time, the bolus infusion ratio from a previous examination was adapted to fit the subsequent examination. 17 male volunteers were included in the study. Boli and infusions with different weightings were given to the subjects and were characterised by kbol values from 74 âmin down to 42 âmin. Metabolite analysis was used to ascertain the value of unmetabolised flumazenil in the plasma, and PET imaging was used to assess its binding in the grey matter. The flumazenil time-activity curves (TACs) in the brain were decomposed into activity contributions from pure grey and white matter and analysed for 12 âvol of interest (VOIs). The curves highlighted a large variability in metabolic rates between the subjects, with kbol â= â54.3 âmin being a reliable value to provide flumazenil equilibrium conditions in the majority of the VOIs and cases. The distribution volume of flumazenil in all 12 VOIs was determined.
Asunto(s)
Radioisótopos de Carbono/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil , Moduladores del GABA , Sustancia Gris , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Células Receptoras Sensoriales , Sustancia Blanca , Adulto , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/sangre , Flumazenil/farmacocinética , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/sangre , Moduladores del GABA/farmacocinética , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/efectos de los fármacos , Sustancia Gris/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Imagen Multimodal , Células Receptoras Sensoriales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Receptoras Sensoriales/metabolismo , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Blanca/efectos de los fármacos , Sustancia Blanca/metabolismo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Blue poison dart frogs (Dendrobates tinctorius azureus) are commonly maintained in zoological institutions and are becoming popular in the pet trade industry. Sedation or light anesthesia is required for safe and effective handling of this species. In this study, the sedative effects of subcutaneously administered alfaxalone-midazolam-dexmedetomidine (AMD) (20, 40, 5 mg/kg, respectively) and ketamine-midazolam-dexmedetomidine (KMD) (100, 40, 5 mg/kg, respectively) were compared in a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study in juvenile blue poison dart frogs (n = 10). Both protocols were partially reversed 45 min after administration of either protocol with subcutaneously administered flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg) and atipamezole (50 mg/kg). Heart rate, pulmonic respiratory rate, various reflexes, and behavioral parameters were monitored after drug administration. Both protocols resulted in rapid loss of righting reflex [median (range): AMD, 5 min (5-5 min); KMD, 5 min (5-10 min)]. Time to complete recovery was similar with both protocols (mean ± SD: AMD, 97.5 ± 11.4 min; KMD, 96.5 ± 25.4 min). The AMD protocol resulted in pulmonic respiratory depression, whereas no significant difference in heart rate was found between the two protocols. All frogs were observed eating within 24 hr of chemical restraint. Gastric prolapses occurred in four frogs (AMD 3, KMD 1) that were easily reduced with a cotton-tip application. No other adverse reactions were observed. The results of this study provide two different subcutaneous chemical restraint protocols in juvenile blue poison dart frogs.
Asunto(s)
Dexmedetomidina/farmacología , Midazolam/farmacología , Pregnanodionas/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacología , Envejecimiento , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/farmacología , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos/farmacología , Animales , Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Antídotos/farmacología , Anuros , Sedación Consciente , Estudios Cruzados , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/farmacología , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/farmacología , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Pregnanodionas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Isoflurane, an inhalational general anesthetic widely used in medical practice, belonging to the group of volatile liquids together with desflurane and sevoflurane, with various properties including sedation, hypnosis and anesthesia of patients undergoing treatment. surgical acts. Volatile inhalational anesthetics (halogenated) as mechanism of action, has the property of increasing inhibitory synaptic transmission at postsynaptic level by potentiating ion channels regulated by ligand activated by alpha-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Flumazenil is a benzodiazepine antagonist belonging to the group of imidazobenzodiazepine. It is currently known that there is no specific drug capable of antagonizing the effects of halogenates that allow the rapid and complete recovery of general anesthesia, for this reason this work focuses its efforts on demonstrating whether flumazenil has the ability to reverse the actions of the patient. isoflurane and allow an early restoration of the level of consciousness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study to be performed is a clinical type of longitudinal, prospective, unicentric and double blind. The sample will be formed by patients who are going to be subjected to a balanced general anesthesia. The sample will be divided into 2 large groups: group C (control) and group F (Flumazenil). At the end of the surgery, the mixture will be administered according to the selected group in a random manner (Flumazenil 0.25 mg or 0.9% solution in a 20 cc syringe) and the time of extubation, recovery time of the level of consciousness, time of discharge UCPA and hemodynamic state (FC, TAM and SO2). RESULTS: The flumazenil group showed a significantly shorter time from injection to extubation than the placebo group (p = 0.007). Differences in terms of shorter times needed to achieve Aldrete of 9 points in the flumazenil group (P = 0.04) were observed as were shorter anesthetic arousal times represented by a Ramsey 2. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and saturation they had similar values between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study showed that a single dose of 0.25 mg of flumazenil administered at the end of the surgical act, just after completing all surgical stimulation was beneficial (P = 0.007) in the context of extubation times and shorter anesthetic arousal times.
INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El isoflurano un anestésico general inhalatorio usado ampliamente en la práctica médica, perteneciente al grupo de los líquidos volátiles junto con el desflurano y sevoflurano, con variadas propiedades entre las que se encuentran la sedación, hipnosis y anestesia de los pacientes sometidos a actos quirúrgicos. Los anestésicos inhalatorios volátiles (halogenados) como mecanismo de acción, tiene la propiedad de aumentar la transmisión sináptica inhibidora a nivel postsináptico potenciando los canales iónicos regulados por ligando activados por ácido alfa-aminobutírico (GABA). El flumazenil es un antagonista benzodiazepínico perteneciente al grupo de los imidazobenzodiazepina. Se conoce actualmente que no existe un fármaco específico capaz de antagonizar los efectos de los halogenados que permitan la recuperación rápida y completa de la anestesia general, por tal motivo este trabajo centra sus esfuerzos en demostrar si el flumazenil tiene la capacidad para revertir las acciones del isoflurane y permitir un restablecimiento temprano del nivel de conciencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El estudio a realizar es de tipo clínico de corte longitudinal, prospectivo, unicéntrico y doble ciego. La muestra se conformará por pacientes que vayan a ser sometidos a anestesia general balanceada. Se procederá a dividir la muestra en 2 grandes grupos: grupo C (control) y grupo F (flumazenil). Al final de la cirugía se administrará la mezcla según grupo seleccionado de manera al azar (flumazenil 0,25 mg o solución 0,9% en una jeringa de 20 cc) y se valorará el tiempo de extubación, tiempo de recuperación del nivel de conciencia, tiempo de alta de la UCPA y estado hemodinámico (FC, TAM y SO2). RESULTADOS: El grupo de flumazenil presentó un tiempo desde la inyección hasta la extubación significativamente más bajo que el grupo placebo (p = 0,007). Se observaron diferencias en términos de tiempos más bajos necesario para alcanzar Aldrete de 9 puntos en el grupo flumazenil (P = 0,04) al igual que tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos representados por un Ramsey 2. La frecuencia cardíaca, presión arterial media y la saturación tuvieron valores similares entre los 2 grupos. CONCLUSIÓN: El estudio demostró que una única dosis de 0,25 mg de flumazenil administrado al final del acto quirúrgico, justo después de culminar toda estimulación quirúrgica fue beneficiosa (P = 0,007) en el contexto de tiempos de extubación y tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Flumazenil/farmacología , Moduladores del GABA/farmacología , Isoflurano/antagonistas & inhibidores , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Extubación Traqueal , Anestesia GeneralRESUMEN
Intrathecal (IT) delivery and pharmacology of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) for the CNS have been successfully developed to treat spinal muscular atrophy. However, ASO pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties remain poorly understood in the IT compartment. We applied multimodal imaging techniques to elucidate the IT PK and PD of unlabeled, radioactively labeled, or fluorescently labeled ASOs targeting ubiquitously expressed or neuron-specific RNAs. Following lumbar IT bolus injection in rats, all ASOs spread rostrally along the neuraxis, adhered to meninges, and were partially cleared to peripheral lymph nodes and kidneys. Rapid association with the pia and arterial walls preceded passage of ASOs across the glia limitans, along arterial intramural basement membranes, and along white-matter axonal bundles. Several neuronal and glial cell types accumulated ASOs over time, with evidence of probable glial accumulation preceding neuronal uptake. IT doses of anti-GluR1 and anti-Gabra1 ASOs markedly reduced the mRNA and protein levels of their respective neurotransmitter receptor protein targets by 2 weeks and anti-Gabra1 ASOs also reduced binding of the GABAA receptor PET ligand 18F-flumazenil in the brain over 4 weeks. Our multimodal imaging approaches elucidate multiple transport routes underlying the CNS distribution, clearance, and efficacy of IT-dosed ASOs.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/farmacocinética , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligonucleótidos Antisentido/farmacocinética , Animales , Arterias/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias/metabolismo , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Encéfalo/citología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Microscopía Intravital , Masculino , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Neuroglía/metabolismo , Neuronas/metabolismo , Oligonucleótidos Antisentido/administración & dosificación , Piamadre/diagnóstico por imagen , Piamadre/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/análisis , ARN Mensajero/genética , Ratas , Receptores AMPA/análisis , Receptores AMPA/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores AMPA/genética , Receptores de GABA-A/análisis , Receptores de GABA-A/genética , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Análisis Espacio-Temporal , Tionucleótidos/administración & dosificación , Tionucleótidos/farmacocinética , Distribución TisularRESUMEN
This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of rodent behavioral tests to assess the effects of midazolam and flumazenil in green iguanas. Four tests commonly used to assess sedation in rodents-the open field test, forced swim test, behavioral scale, and traction test-were conducted in 10 juveniles iguanas. The animals received midazolam (2 mg/kg IM) or 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM), and the tests were conducted between 0 and 300 min thereafter. To verify the effects of midazolam and flumazenil, the most informative tests from the evaluation stage and the limb withdrawal latency time (LWLT) were used. All 10 iguanas were tested under 4 conditions, as follows: MS, midazolam (2 mg/kg IM), followed 30 min later by 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM); FS, flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg IM), followed by 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM) 30 min later; MF, midazolam (2 mg/ kg IM), followed by flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg IM) 30 min later; and CON, 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM). The behavioral scale and the forced swim test showed the best detection of the onset, peak effect, and the differences between the sedated and control iguanas, with testing done between 15 and 240 min after drug administration. The sedative effect of midazolam began at 15 min and persisted through 180 min when assessed on the behavioral scale and 240 min when assessed by the forced swim test; flumazenil administration reversed the sedative effect. An increase in the LWLT was observed in the midazolam treatment groups between 15 and 30 min after drug administration. Flumazenil decreased LWLT between 15 and 180 min in the FS and at 60 min in the MF. In conclusion, the best methods to assess sedation in iguanas were the behavioral scale and the forced swim test. A dose of 2 mg/kg of midazolam was effective at inducing sedation in these juvenile iguanas, and this effect could be reversed by flumazenil.
Asunto(s)
Flumazenil/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Iguanas , Midazolam/farmacología , Animales , Antídotos/administración & dosificación , Antídotos/farmacología , Femenino , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Ciencia de los Animales de Laboratorio , Masculino , Midazolam/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The anxiolytic effect of earlier reported piperazinediones was assessed by elevated plus maze (EPM), hole-board and open-field (OFT) tests. The rats were administered pretreatment of three different doses i.e. 2, 1 and 0.5â¯mg/kg of compounds 52, 53 and 55 for seven consecutive days. Compound 52 and diazepam showed increase in open arm entries, increase in time spent therein and total arm entries at 1â¯mg/kg dose. The compound also produced increase in the number of head dip, sniffing behavior and total number of squares crossed compared to diazepam. In OFT paradigm grooming behavior, number of central squares crossed and the time spent in central area did not reveal statistical differences for diazepam and compound 52 at 1â¯mg/kg dose. Flumazenil mediated antagonism experiments of these showed that they were acting through benzodiazepine site on GABAA receptor. The levels of 5HT and 5HIAA were estimated in amygdalar region. Level of 5HT was found to be equivalent in case of compound 52 and diazepam treatment at dose of 1â¯mg/kg. Interestingly, compound 52 did not display sedative effect at higher dose in both animal models. Thus, present study indicated that compound 52 produced anti-anxiety property through modulation of GABAergic transmission.
Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Dicetopiperazinas/uso terapéutico , Moduladores del GABA/uso terapéutico , Amígdala del Cerebelo/metabolismo , Animales , Ansiolíticos/administración & dosificación , Ansiolíticos/efectos adversos , Ansiolíticos/farmacología , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Benzodiazepinas/química , Dominio Catalítico , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/farmacología , Dicetopiperazinas/administración & dosificación , Dicetopiperazinas/efectos adversos , Dicetopiperazinas/farmacología , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacología , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/efectos adversos , Moduladores del GABA/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Masculino , Aprendizaje por Laberinto/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Receptores de GABA-A/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismoRESUMEN
The study objective was to evaluate the sedative, muscle relaxant, and cardiorespiratory effects of midazolam and flumazenil in the ball python (Python regius). Ten healthy adult female ball pythons were used in a randomized and blinded crossover trial evaluating the effects of two dosages (1 and 2 mg/kg intramuscular [i.m.] in the cranial third of the body). In a subsequent open trial, nine ball pythons received 1 mg/kg i.m. of midazolam followed by 0.08 mg/kg i.m. of flumazenil 60 min later. Heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and the level of sedation and muscle relaxation (using a semiobjective scoring system) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between midazolam dosages for any of the parameters evaluated. Sedation scores were significantly increased compared with baseline from 15 min (1 mg/kg) and 10 min (2 mg/kg) postinjection up until 56 hr (1 mg/kg) and 72 hr (2 mg/kg) postinjection. Peak effect was reached 60 min postinjection, with 60% of snakes (6/10) being unable to right themselves. One snake developed paradoxical excitation with the 2 mg/kg dosage. Heart rates were significantly lower than baseline from 30 min to 128 hr postinjection with both midazolam dosages. Respiratory rates were significantly lower than baseline at four time points, with the highest dosage only: 15, 45, 60 min, and 8 hr postinjection. Flumazenil resulted in reversal of sedation and muscle relaxation in all snakes within 10 min of administration. However, resedation was evident in all snakes 3 hr after reversal. Midazolam administered at 1 and 2 mg/kg i.m. provides a moderate to profound, although prolonged, sedation and muscle relaxation in ball pythons. Flumazenil reverses the effects of midazolam in ball pythons, but its duration of action at the evaluated dosage is much shorter than midazolam, leading to resedation.
Asunto(s)
Boidae , Flumazenil/farmacología , Moduladores del GABA/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Midazolam/farmacología , Animales , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Moduladores del GABA/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Agonists of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor exert anxiolytic effects in anxiety disorders, raising the possibility that altered GABA-ergic function may play a role in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, few neuroimaging studies have assessed the function or binding potential of the central GABAA BZD receptor system in PTSD. Therefore, our aim was to compare the BZD receptor binding potential between PTSD patients and healthy controls. Twelve medication-free participants with a current diagnosis of PTSD and 15 matched healthy controls underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using [11C] flumazenil. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained and co-registered to the PET images to permit co-location of neuroanatomical structures in the lower resolution PET image data. Compared to healthy controls, PTSD patients exhibited increased BZD binding in the caudal anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus (p's < 0.05). Severity of PTSD symptoms positively correlated with BZD binding in the left mid- and anterior insular cortices. This study extends previous findings by suggesting that central BZD receptor system involvement in PTSD includes portions of the default mode and salience networks, along with insular regions that support interoception and autonomic arousal.
Asunto(s)
Corteza Cerebral/metabolismo , Receptores de GABA-A/metabolismo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/metabolismo , Adulto , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Corteza Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacocinética , Giro del Cíngulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Giro del Cíngulo/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Lóbulo Parietal/diagnóstico por imagen , Lóbulo Parietal/metabolismo , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Abstract Background and objectives The primary aim was to determine risk factors for flumazenil administration during postanesthesia recovery. A secondary aim was to describe outcomes among patients who received flumazenil. Methods Patients admitted to the postanesthesia recovery room at a large, academic, tertiary care facility after surgery under general anesthesia from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2015, were identified and matched to 2 controls each, by age, sex, and surgical procedure. Flumazenil was administered in the recovery phase immediately after general anesthesia, according to the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Conditional logistic regression, accounting for the 1:2 matched-set case-control study designs, was used to assess characteristics associated with flumazenil use. Results The incidence of flumazenil administration in the postanesthesia care unit was 9.9 per 10,000 (95% CI, 8.4-11.6) general anesthetics. History of obstructive sleep apnea (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.09), longer anesthesia (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24 per 30 minutes), use of total intravenous anesthesia (OR = 6.09; 95% CI 2.60-14.25), and use of benzodiazepines (OR = 8.17; 95% CI 3.71-17.99) were associated with risk for flumazenil administration. Among patients who received midazolam, cases treated with flumazenil received a higher median (interquartile range) dose than controls: 3.5 mg (2.0-4.0 mg) vs. 2.0 mg (2.0-2.0 mg), respectively (p < 0.001). Flumazenil use was correlated with a higher rate of unanticipated noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, longer postanesthesia care unit stay, and increased rate of intensive care unit admissions. Conclusions Patients who required flumazenil postoperatively had received a higher dosage of benzodiazepines and utilized more postoperative health care resources. More conservative perioperative use of benzodiazepines may improve postoperative recovery and use of health care resources.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Determinar os fatores de risco da administração de flumazenil durante a recuperação pós-anestésica e descrever os desfechos entre os pacientes que receberam flumazenil. Métodos Os pacientes admitidos em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica de um grande centro universitário em setor terciário de cuidados pós-cirurgia sob anestesia geral entre 1° de janeiro de 2010 e 30 de abril de 2015 foram identificados e pareados com dois controles cada por idade, sexo e procedimento cirúrgico. Flumazenil foi administrado na fase de recuperação imediatamente após a anestesia geral, de acordo com a avaliação clínica do anestesiologista. Os dados demográficos, dos procedimentos e dos desfechos foram extraídos do registro eletrônico de saúde. A regressão logística condicional para os desenhos do estudo de caso-controle pareado em 1:2 foi usada para avaliar as características associadas ao uso de flumazenil. Resultados A incidência da administração de flumazenil em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foi de 9,9 por 10.000 (95% IC: 8,4-1,6) anestesias gerais. História da apneia obstrutiva do sono (razão de chances [OR] = 2,27; IC 95%: 1,02-5,09), anestesia de longa duração (OR = 1,13; IC 95%: 1,03-1,24 por 30 minutos), uso de anestesia intravenosa total (OR = 6,09; IC de 95%: 2,60-14,25) e uso de benzodiazepínicos (OR = 8,17; IC 95%: 3,71-17,99) foram associados a risco para a administração de flumazenil. Entre os pacientes que receberam midazolam, os casos tratados com flumazenil receberam uma dose mediana mais alta (intervalo interquartil) do que os controles: 3,5 mg (2,0-4,0 mg) vs. 2,0 mg (2,0-2,0 mg), respectivamente (p < 0,001). O uso de flumazenil foi correlacionado com uma taxa maior não prevista de ventilação não invasiva com pressão positiva, permanência mais longa em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e aumento da taxa de admissões em unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão Os pacientes que precisaram de flumazenil no pós-operatório receberam uma dose maior de benzodiazepínicos e usaram mais recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório. O uso mais conservador de benzodiazepínicos no período perioperatório pode melhorar a recuperação e o uso de recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Despite its benignity, upper respiratory infections (URIs) 1 increase the risk of postoperative respiratory complications during the perioperative and postoperative periods. Flumazenil could improve the symptoms of respiratory obstruction.To evaluate the effect of flumazenil on the occurrence of respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence of children with preoperative URI.This was a prospective study of 164 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent strabismus surgery under general anesthesia at the Tianjin Eye Hospital between August 2016 and April 2017. The patients were grouped as: normal airway (N), recent mild URI (I), normal airway and flumazenil (NF), and recent mild URI and flumazenil (group IF) (nâ=â41/group). An initial dose of flumazenil (0.1âmg) was administrated intravenously to groups IF and NF. The intraoperative and postoperative respiratory complications were recorded by one anesthesiologist unaware of the grouping.All patients underwent surgery uneventfully. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was higher in group I compared with the other 3 groups (IF: 17%; I: 41%; NF: 5%; N: 10%; Pâ=â.0147). During the PACU period, significant differences among groups were seen for cough (IF: 15%; I: 20%; NF: 2%; N: 0%; Pâ=â.004), secretion (IF: 17%; I: 29%; NF: 5%; N: 7%; Pâ=â.007), low oxygen saturation (IF: 12%; I: 32%; NF: 2%; N: 7%; Pâ=â.001), and glossocoma (IF: 15%; I: 34%; NF: 10%; N: 32%; Pâ=â.015).Respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence were higher in patients with recent preoperative URI compared to patients with healthy airways. Postoperative flumazenil could reduce the incidence of glossocoma.