The Effects of Lumbricus rubellus Extract on Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and IL-31 Levels in Children with Atopic Dermatitis.

Background and Objectives: The ineffective combination of corticosteroids and antibiotics in treating some atopic dermatitis (AD) cases has been concerning. The skin barrier defects in AD ease the colonization of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which results in a rise in interleukin-31 (IL-31). Lumbricus rubellus (L. rubellus) has shown antimicrobial and antiallergic effects but has not been studied yet to decrease the growth of S. aureus and IL-31 levels in AD patients. This study aimed to analyze the effect of L. rubellus extract in reducing S. aureus colonization, the IL-31 level, and the severity of AD. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) (international registration number TCTR20231025004) was conducted on 40 AD patients attending Dermatology and Venereology Polyclinic, Mother and Child Hospital (RSIA), Aceh, Indonesia, from October 2021 to March 2022. AD patients aged 8-16 who had a Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index > 25, with total IgE serum level > 100 IU/mL, and had healthy weight were randomly assigned into two groups: one received fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% and placebo (control group) and one received fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% combined with L. rubellus extract (Vermint®) (intervention group). The S. aureus colony was identified using a catalase test, coagulase test, and MSA media. The serum IL-31 levels were measured using ELISA assay, while the SCORAD index was used to assess the severity of and improvement in AD. Mean scores for measured variables were compared between the two groups using an unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A significant decline in S. aureus colonization (p = 0.001) and IL-31 (p = 0.013) in patients receiving L. rubellus extract was found in this study. Moreover, fourteen AD patients in the intervention group showed an improvement in the SCORAD index of more than 35% (p = 0.057). Conclusions: L. rubellus extract significantly decreases S. aureus colonization and the IL-31 level in AD patients, suggesting its potential as an adjuvant therapy for children with AD.

Effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies (REACT): a prospective, non-randomized, and multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of the intravitreal fluocinolone-acetonide implant (FAc-i) in patients with chronic diabetic macular edema who did not sufficiently respond to other available therapies. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, and phase-IV observational study conducted on patients with recurrent-DME who were insufficient responders to currently available therapies (REACT-Study). The primary end-point was the mean change in best-corrected-visual-acuity from baseline to month-24 values. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes from 31 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 68.0 ± 7.7 years, and 10 (32.3%) were women. Study patients had received 5.3 ± 7.3 previous DME treatments before starting the study. In the overall study sample, BCVA improved from 56.1 ± 12.3 letters at baseline to 62.4 ± 17.0 letters at month-24 (p = 0.0510). The eyes with a baseline BCVA < 70 ETDRS letters had a significant improvement in BCVA from 53.2 ± 10.2 letters at baseline to 61.5 ± 17.9 letters at month-24 (p = 0.0165). In the overall study population, central-subfoveal-thickness (CST) was significantly reduced from 474.0 ± 135.1 µm at baseline to 333.4 ± 135.6 at month-24 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, macular-volume (MV) was significantly reduced from 10.7 ± 2.7 mm3 at baseline to 9.6 ± 2.9 mm3 (p = 0.0027) at month-24. Among the 31 study eyes, 19 (61.3%) required an additional treatment for DME. Throughout the study, 9 (29.0%) eyes required ocular hypotensive medication for controlling their intraocular-pressure and 5 (16.1%) eyes underwent cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In DME eyes who did not sufficiently respond to previous therapies, the FAc-i was associated with an improvement in visual and anatomic outcomes. There were no unexpected adverse-events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT identifier: 2016-001680-37.

Functional and Morphological Responses to Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg in Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema Evaluated as the Area-Under-the-Curve.

Purpose: This study investigated the impact of baseline clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) factors on the response to a 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in patients with noninfectious uveitic macular edema evaluated by the area under the curve over 24 months. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of eyes of patients with noninfectious uveitic macular edema undergoing FAc treatment, with follow-up from baseline to 24 months. The area under the curve (AUC) of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Clinical and OCT data at the time of FAc administration were collected, and associations with AUC of BCVA and CMT changes were investigated. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled. BCVA and CMT significantly improved after FAc implantation (P < 0.05). AUCBCVA and AUCCMT were 0.41 ± 0.33 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution/6 months and 320.15 ± 321.64 µm/6 months, respectively. Better baseline BCVA (coefficient [coef.] = 0.83, P < 0.001) and macular thickness reduction after FAc administration (coef. = -0.0001, P < 0.05) were associated with better BCVA after FAc treatment. In contrast, baseline OCT biomarkers such as ellipsoid zone reflectivity and choroidal vascularity index, sex, or disease duration before FAc injection showed no correlation with AUCBCVA and AUCCMT (P > 0.05). The younger the patient at the time of FAc injection, the greater the reduction in CMT (coef. = 1.76, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Among all clinical and morphological baseline factors, Baseline BCVA was the strongest predictor for AUCBCVA, while no association with baseline OCT features was observed. Overall, improvement of BCVA and CMT after FAc injection was maintained over 24 months. This study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under the DRKS-ID: DRKS00024399.

Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (ILUVIEN®) for the Treatment of Retinal Conditions. A Review of Clinical Studies.

Fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) is a corticosteroid implant indicated for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who have previously received conventional treatment without good response, non-infectious posterior uveitis, and as an off-label treatment of the macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. FAc is a non-biodegradable 0.19 mg intravitreal implant which is designed to release FAc over 3 years at a rate of approximately 0.2 mcg per day. The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of Iluvien and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of the above retinal disorders.

Efficacy of 190 mcg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant: microperimetry and OCT real-life data.

OBJECTIVE: Fluocinolone acetonide is a valid alternative treatment for patients with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) with poor response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of ILUVIEN® implant in pseudophakic eyes with persistent DME. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre pilot-study of 8 patients with persistent DME treated with the ILUVIEN implant, despite previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and/or steroid treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) central retinal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP) and microperimetric data were evaluated at baseline and month 1, 3 and 6 post treatment. RESULTS: All data are presented as mean and standard deviation. At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months, we had BCVA of 0.26±0.22, 0.38±0.27, 0.48±0.27 and 0.46±0.24; IOP of 15.00±2.67, 15.50±3.16, 14.88±2.42 and 15.63±2.67 mmHg; macular thickness of 652±231, 487±278, 475±287 and 413±211 µm; macular sensitivity of 6.83±4.20, 6.13±3.72, 7.68±3.40 and 7.71±3.33 dB; bivariate contour elliptic area (BCEA) 95.4% 3.8±3.42, 6.06±10.06, 3.05±2.46 and 2.59±2.19°2. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of our study, fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) is a valid therapy option despite some limitations. It has been evidenced that FAc is more effective in patients with mild central macular thickening, while in those with modest to severe central macular thickness (CMT), different therapy strategies should be considered.

[Comparison of available clinical and imaging tools to assess good positioning of a fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien®) in the vitreous cavity after injection]. / Comparaison des moyens clinique et d'imagerie disponibles en pratique clinique pour objectiver la présence de l'implant d'acétonide de fluocinolone (Iluvien®) dans la cavité vitréenne après injection.

INTRODUCTION: Sustained-release corticosteroid implants are injected into the vitreous cavity using preloaded pens. The fluocinolone (FAc) implant is approximately half the size of the dexamethasone implant (Dex-I). It is simply introduced in the vitreous base rather than propelled into the vitreous cavity as is Dex-I. Verification of its positioning after injection is thus difficult by indirect ophthalmoscopy. The goal of our study is to compare the performance of available clinical and imaging tools to confirm the presence of the FAc in the vitreous cavity following injection. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 12 consecutive patients were included in a retrospective, single-center, observational study carried out at the Bordeaux University Hospital, France. All patients were injected with the FAc after pupil dilation, and presence of the implant was immediately checked by indirect biomicroscopy, wide-field retinography (Clarus®, Carl-Zeiss-Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and ultra-wide-field retinography (California®, Optos, Edinburgh, United-Kingdom). Seven days later, a B-mode ultrasonography (10MHz, AVISO, Quantel-medical, France) and an UBM ultrasonography (50MHz, AVISO, Quantel-medical, France) were performed. RESULTS: Indirect biomicroscopy and wide-field retinography detected 4/12 implants (33.3%). Ultra-wide-field retinophotography detected 6/12 implants (50%). All the implants seen using indirect biomicroscopy and wide-field retinography were also visualized with ultra-wide-field. B-mode ultrasonography showed 5/12 implants (41.6%) and UBM 9/12 implants (75%). Finally, one implant dislocated into the anterior chamber and was seen in the iridocorneal angle on gonioscopy. CONCLUSION: Objective confirmation of the proper positioning of the FAc implant in the vitreous cavity is mandatory. If both indirect ophthalmoscopy and anterior examination fail to detect it, ultra-wide field retinography along with UBM ultrasonography, if necessary, appear to be the two best imaging modalities to use.

Alternative technique for the injection of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) in case of leakage of its injector.

PURPOSE: To show an alternative surgical technique for the introduction of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (Iluvien®) into the vitreous cavity using a 23-gauge (G) trocar if it is retained during its implantation in the subconjunctival space. METHODS: We describe the surgical procedure performed to solve the complication: The FAc implant was extracted from the subconjunctival space using flat retinal forceps. A 23-G trocar was inserted 3,5 mm to the limbus. The same flat retinal forceps were used to take the FAc implant and introduce it into the vitreous cavity using a 23-G trocar. RESULTS: The patient's best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (Snellen) improved from 20/200 to 20/63 and the central macular thickness (CMT) was reduced from 610 microns (µm) to 215 µm after one week of the FAc implantation. He remained stable after 3 months of follow-up, with a BCVA of 20/63 and a CMT of 191 µm. His intraocular pressure (IOP) remained stable and the integrity of the implant was checked by indirect ophthalmoscopy. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the intravitreal FAc implant using a 23-gauge trocar constitutes a valid alternative if it is retained during its implantation in the subconjunctival space.The functionality of the implant remained intact in our patient.

Factors associated with the response to fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg in diabetic macular oedema evaluated as the area-under-the-curve.

OBJECTIVES: The area-under-the-curve (AUC) measures the average drug effect over time. We investigated the impact of baseline clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) factors on the response to fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) 0.19 mg implant in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) as the AUC over 36 months. METHODS: Retrospective study of DMO eyes undergoing FAc with follow-up from 12 to 36 months. The AUC of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were calculated with the trapezoidal rule. Demographic and clinical data at the time of FAc administration were collected, and associations with BCVA and CMT changes were investigated with linear mixed models. RESULTS: Eighty-nine eyes of 63 patients were enroled; median follow-up was 26 months. Mean±standard deviation (SD) AUCBCVA and AUCCMT after FAc injection were 0.24 ± 0.17 LogMAR/month and 179.6 ± 54.3 µm/month, respectively. Worse baseline BCVA (ß = 0.30 LogMAR/month, p < 0.001), higher AUCCMT after FAc administration (ß = 0.08 LogMAR/month, p < 0.001), diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (ß = -0.04 LogMAR/month, p = 0.04), and absent ELM/EZ layers (ß = 0.06 LogMAR/month, p = 0.01) were associated with worse vision over time (higher AUCBCVA). Eyes with higher CMT at baseline (ß = 9.61 µm/month, p < 0.001) and those with tractional DMO (ß = 24.7 µm/month, p = 0.01) had worse anatomic outcomes (higher AUCCMT). The need for additional treatments after FAc was also associated with higher AUCCMT (ß = 33.9 µm/month, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Baseline better visual acuity, lower macular thickness, and photoreceptors' layers integrity are associated with better functional response to FAc in DMO. Eyes with severe DMO at the time of implant or tractional oedema have worse anatomic response. These findings might guide clinicians in a more informed decisional algorithm in treating DMO.

Characterization of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Changes in the Skin after Chronic Fluocinolone Acetonide Treatment.

While topical corticosteroid (TCS) treatment is widely used for many skin diseases, it can trigger adverse side effects, and some of such effects can last for a long time after stopping the treatment. However, molecular changes induced by TCS treatment remain largely unexplored, although transient changes in histology and some major ECM components have been documented. Here, we investigated transcriptomic and proteomic changes induced by fluocinolone acetonide (FA) treatment in the mouse skin by conducting RNA-Seq and quantitative proteomics. Chronic FA treatment affected the expression of 4229 genes, where downregulated genes were involved in cell-cycle progression and ECM organization, and upregulated genes were involved in lipid metabolism. The effects of FA on transcriptome and histology of the skin largely returned to normal by two weeks after the treatment. Only a fraction of transcriptomic changes were reflected by proteomic changes, and the expression of 46 proteins was affected one day after chronic FA treatment. A comparable number of proteins were differentially expressed between control and FA-treated skin samples even at 15 and 30 days after stopping chronic FA treatment. Interestingly, proteins affected during and after chronic FA treatment were largely different. Our results provide fundamental information of molecular changes induced by FA treatment in the skin.

Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide otic solution in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ciprofloxacin 0.3 % and fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 % otic solution (CIPRO+FLUO), ciprofloxacin 0.3 % otic solution alone (CIPRO), and fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 % otic solution alone (FLUO) administered into the middle ears of pediatric patients with Acute Otitis Media with Tympanostomy Tubes (AOMT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a PK analysis of patients who participated in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind AOMT clinical trials (SALVAT studies CIFLOTIII/10IA02 and CIFLOTIII/10IA04). Each patient received 0.25 mL of CIPRO+FLUO, CIPRO, or FLUO twice a day instilled into the ear canal(s) for 7 days to treat AOMT. Blood samples of patients with unilateral AOMT were collected before the administration of the first dose of study medication at Visit 1 (day 1) and within 1-2 h after the last dose on day 7. Blood samples were analyzed to detect ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide concentrations using two validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) methods, with the lower limit of quantification for ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide in plasma samples being 1 ng/mL. Thirty randomly selected patients between 10 months and 10 years of age (mean age, 4.4 years) were included in the study. Although all available samples were analyzed, only PK data of the 22 patients with both samples and unilateral disease were considered for study purposes. RESULTS: No detectable concentrations of ciprofloxacin or fluocinolone acetonide in plasma were observed (<1 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated negligible systemic exposure to ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide following topical otic administration in pediatric patients with AOMT.

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofloxacin Plus Fluocinolone Acetonide Among Patients With Acute Otitis Externa: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, plus fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solution seems to be efficacious and safe in treating acute otitis externa (AOE) compared with ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, or fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solution alone. Objective: To evaluate the superiority of ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, plus fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solution compared with ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, or fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solution alone in treating AOE. Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted between August 1, 2017, and September 14, 2018, at 36 centers in the US. The study population comprised 493 patients aged 6 months or older with AOE of less than 21 days' duration with otorrhea, moderate or severe otalgia, and edema, as well as a Brighton grading of II or III (tympanic membrane obscure but without systemic illness). Statistical analysis was performed from November 14, 2018, to February 14, 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone, ciprofloxacin, or fluocinolone twice daily for 7 days and were evaluated on day 1 (visit 1; baseline), days 3 to 4 (visit 2; conducted via telephone), days 8 to 10 (visit 3; end of treatment), and days 15 to 17 (visit 4; test of cure). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was therapeutic cure (clinical and microbiological) at the end of the treatment period. The principal secondary end point was the time to end of ear pain. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the microbiological intent-to-treat population, clinical intent-to-treat population, and microbiological intent-to-treat population with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Results: A total of 493 patients (254 female patients [51.5%]; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [23.1] years) were randomized (197 to receive ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone, 196 to receive ciprofloxacin, and 100 to receive fluocinolone). Therapeutic cure in the modified intent-to-treat population with ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone (63 of 103 [61.2%]) was statistically comparable to that of ciprofloxacin (49 of 91 [53.8%]; difference in response rate, 7.3%; 95% CI, -6.6% to 21.2%; P = .30) and fluocinolone (20 of 45 [44.4%]; difference in response rate, 16.7%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 34.0%; P = .06) at visit 3 and significantly superior to ciprofloxacin at visit 4 (90 of 103 [87.4%] vs 69 of 91 [75.8%]; difference in response rate, 11.6%; 95% CI, 0.7%-22.4%; P = .04). A statistically faster resolution of otalgia was achieved among patients treated with ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone (median, 5.0 days [range, 4.2-6.3 days]) vs ciprofloxacin (median, 5.9 days [range, 4.3-7.3 days]; 95% CI, 4.3-7.3 days; P = .002) or fluocinolone (median, 7.7 days [range, 6.7-9.0 days]; 95% CI, 6.7-9.0 days; P < .001). Ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone demonstrated statistical superiority in sustained microbiological response vs ciprofloxacin (94 of 103 [91.3%] vs 74 of 91 [81.3%]; difference in response rate, 9.9%; 95% CI, 0.3%-19.6%; P = .04) and fluocinolone (34 of 45 [75.6%]; difference in response rate, 15.7%; 95% CI, 2.0%-29.4%; P = .01) and in the microbiological outcome vs fluocinolone by visit 3 (99 of 103 [96.1%] vs 37 of 45 [82.2%]; difference in response rate, 13.9%; 95% CI, 2.1%-25.7%; P = .01) and ciprofloxacin by visit 4 (97 of 103 [94.2%] vs 77 of 91 [84.6%]; difference in response rate, 9.6%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18.2%; P = .02). Fifteen adverse events related to study medications were registered, all of which were mild or moderate. Conclusions and Relevance: Ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, plus fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solution was efficacious and safe in treating AOE but did not demonstrate superiority vs ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, or fluocinolone acetonide, 0.025%, otic solutions alone in the main study end point of therapeutic cure. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03196973.

Effect of fluocinolone acetonide (0.1%) treatment in oral lichen planus patients on salivary lactoferrin levels and Candida colonization: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although topical steroids are an effective treatment for oral lichen planus, they can have suppressive effects on oral immunity and predispose the patients to Candida overgrowth. Lactoferrin is a crucial local immunity protein in the oral cavity with important antimicrobial activity. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate salivary lactoferrin secretion levels and Candida colonization in oral lichen planus patients treated with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase. METHODS: Saliva samples were collected from 15 oral lichen planus subjects who had never received topical steroid treatment prior to this study and 15 healthy volunteers to determine their salivary lactoferrin levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and to investigate the presence of oral Candida species at baseline and 3 months after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase. Statistical analysis was performed to compare lactoferrin secretion and Candida colonization levels between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test for independent data or the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for paired data. RESULTS: The salivary lactoferrin secretion level was not significantly different between the control group and oral lichen planus patients or between before and after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase (P > 0.05). Candida was detected in 11 (73.33%) healthy volunteers, 8 (53.33%) oral lichen planus patients before treatment, and 9 (60%) oral lichen planus patients after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase. There was no significant difference in Candida counts between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that using fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase to treat oral lichen planus for 3 months did not affect salivary lactoferrin protein secretion or Candida carriage. Trial registration The trial was registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR identifier: TCTR20200723002).

CHOROIDAL LESIONS UNRESPONSIVE TO FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT IN BIRDSHOT CHORIORETINOPATHY.

PURPOSE: To report the persistence of choroidal lesions despite fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implants and their resolution with oral prednisone treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of a birdshot chorioretinopathy patient at a tertiary referral clinic. RESULTS: Indocyanine angiography revealed resolution of choroidal lesions with oral prednisone and recurrence after discontinuation of oral prednisone. CONCLUSION: Choroidal lesions responded to oral prednisone despite bilateral active fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in a birdshot chorioretinopathy patient.

Removal of a migrated dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) from the anterior chamber using an intravenous cannula.

Ozurdex is a dexamethasone intravitreal implant used for the treatment of macular oedema. A rare but serious complication is the migration of the implant into the anterior chamber (AC) in eyes with absent or incomplete posterior capsules that may lead to corneal decompensation. We report the case of a 75-year-old woman who presented with a 1-day history of decreased vision in her left eye. She had a history of complicated cataract surgery and had received multiple Ozurdex implants for postoperative cystoid macular oedema in the same eye. She had significant left corneal decompensation and a mobile Ozurdex implant in the AC. We report a simple but novel surgical technique for removing an Ozurdex implant from the AC using an intravenous cannula (Venflon). This technique can also be applied to removing a fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien) implant in similar situations.

Retinal Morpho-Functional Changes Following 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate morpho-functional outcomes of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, single-center study. Primary endpoint was the mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to month 1-3. Secondary endpoints included mean CMT change from baseline to month 4-8 and 9-14 and mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), photopic negative response (PhNR) and b-wave of flash full-field electroretinogram (ERG) changes from baseline to month 1-3, 4-8, and 9-14. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (18 eyes) were included. Mean (standard deviation) CMT decreased from 473 (196) µm at baseline to 371 (163) µm at month 1-3 (mean difference - 102.3 ± 98.35 µm, 95% CI ± 46.4 µm; p < 0.0001) and this decrease tended to endure up to month 9-14. BCVA did not change significantly. There was an improvement in mean PhNR amplitude from 2.76 (1.65) µV at baseline to 3.73 (2.32) µV at month 1-3 (mean difference 0.91 (1.14) µV, 95% CI ± 0.54 µV, p = 0.003); b-wave amplitude improved from 8.83 (4.52) µV at baseline versus 10.05 (5.04) µV at month 1-3 (mean difference 1.22 (2.23) µV, 95% CI ± 1.08 µV, p = 0.0384). These ERG positive changes tended to endure up to month 9-14, although they did not reach statistical significance after month 3. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal FAc implant significantly improved anatomic as well as functional outcomes related to middle and inner retinal layers, known to be altered in diabetic retinopathy. Our findings support the hypothesis that intravitreal FAc implant may exert a protective effect in diabetic retinas with diabetic macular edema.

Fluocinolone acetonide vitreous insert for chronic diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review with meta-analysis of real-world experience.

We conducted a meta-analysis of real-world studies on the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant for chronic diabetic macular oedema (DMO), comparing these findings with the Fluocinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema (FAME) study. The primary outcome was mean change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were 36-month mean BCVA, mean central macular thickness (CMT) change, rates of eyes receiving supplementary intravitreal therapy, cataract surgery, intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering drops and glaucoma surgery. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Nine real-world studies were included. The FAc implant yielded a significantly improved BCVA at 24 and 36 months (24-month MD = 4.52; 95% CI 2.56-6.48; 36-month MD = 8.10; 95% CI 6.34-9.86). These findings were comparable with the FAME study. The FAc implant yielded significantly reduced 24- and 36-month CMT. Pooled proportions of cataract surgery, IOP-lowering drops and glaucoma surgery were 39%, 27% and 3%, respectively, all lower than the FAME study. Pooled estimate of supplementary intravitreal therapy was 39%, higher than the 15.2% of the FAME study. This meta-analysis of real-world studies confirms favorable visual and anatomical outcomes following FAc insert for chronic DMO. In real-life studies more than one third of patients received supplementary intravitreal therapy, an issue that needs to be further explored.

Effectiveness and tolerability of the fluocinolone acetonide implant in patients with diabetic macular edema in UAE: 12-Month results.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate 12-month outcomes following fluocinolone acetonide (FAc 0.2 µg/day) implant in pseudophakic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that persists or recurs despite previous treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) and dexamethasone implant (DEX) in a UAE population. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-center, 12-month audit study, where 22 pseudophakic eyes (22 patients) with DME were treated with the FAc intravitreal implant according to licensed UAE indications. Outcome measurements at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: Post-FAc implantation, mean BCVA significantly improved at 1, 3, and 12 months (+10.4 ± 16.1, +22.8 ± 13.6, and +25.5 ± 13.0 letters, respectively; p < 0.0001), with 86% of eyes gaining ⩾15 letters at month 12. Similarly, CMT reduced significantly at month 1, and stabilized thereafter at months 3-12 (-171.5 ± 72.5 µm, -240.9 ± 74.2 µm, and -246.2 ± 93.4 µm, respectively; p < 0.0001). By month 12, 64% (n = 14/22) of eyes had a CMT below 300 µm. Only 1 eye had an IOP ⩾ 21 mmHg at baseline and month 12. Five eyes required IOP lowering drops and 1 required IOP-lowering surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In pseudophakic patients with DME FAc implant provide a substantial functional and anatomical benefits for up to 12 months.