Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 163
Filtrar
1.
Aust Dent J ; 68(2): 113-119, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37066979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standing electric scooters (e-scooters) are a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly transport alternative, but also elicit substantial concern regarding associated craniofacial injuries. This study aims to describe the patient factors, procedural factors and post-operative outcomes of maxillofacial fractures caused by e-scooter accidents. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients aged 18 years or older who were surgically treated for these injuries in 2014-2020 at two Australian tertiary hospitals. RESULTS: There were 18 cases included. Most cases were male (66%). The mean age was 35 years. Common risk factors were alcohol use (86%) and lack of helmet use (62%). The most common fracture pattern was zygomatico-maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures (50%). There were no associated systemic injuries. Mean operation timing was 12 days post-injury for ZMC fractures and 3 days post-injury for condyle fractures. For ZMC fractures, the most common method of fixation was 2-point fixation (66%). For condyle fractures, the most common surgical approach was arch bars only (83%). Post-operative complications were reported in six cases, with malocclusion being the most common (n = 3). Revision surgeries were performed in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial fractures associated with e-scooter accidents appear to be increasing in incidence. Robust longitudinal evaluations with larger sample sizes are required to better understand associated presentations, surgical approaches and post-operative complications.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Australia/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Accidentes de Tránsito
2.
Laryngoscope ; 133(7): 1624-1629, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36326100

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of ocular injury associated with maxillofacial trauma remains poorly defined, with reported rates ranging from 0.8% to 92%. Our study aims to more accurately characterize ocular injuries associated with midface fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 1677 patients from 2015 to 2020 with midface fractures at a Level I trauma center. Isolated nasal bone and frontal process of the maxilla fractures were excluded. Demographic information, mechanism of injury, need for surgery, and ophthalmologic findings were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. RESULTS: 773 patients between the ages of 15 and 92 were identified. Trauma most commonly resulted from assault (63.8%). The association between the mechanism of injury and ocular injury was statistically significant (p = 0.003), with 78.6% of gunshot wounds and 44.3% of assault patients having an ocular injury. The Ophthalmology service evaluated 62.6% of cases preoperatively. Minor ocular injury occurred in 36% of patients, including 46.1% of isolated orbital floor, and 28.2% of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Major ocular injury occurred in 10.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over 10% of patients with midface fractures were found to have major ocular injuries. Ophthalmologic exams should be performed for all patients with midface fractures to guide clinical decision making and prevent further intraoperative ocular insults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. This study represents a retrospective cohort study analyzing ocular injuries detected in patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with maxillofacial fractures between 2015 and 2020 Laryngoscope, 133:1624-1629, 2023.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares , Fracturas Maxilares , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales , Fracturas Orbitales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares/complicaciones , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/complicaciones , Fracturas Orbitales/complicaciones , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 80(12): 1943-1951, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36174662

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Le Fort III fractures are the most severe subtype of the Le Fort fractures and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for mortality among patients who suffer Le Fort III fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed using the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample. Patients with isolated Le Fort III fractures were selected. Patients who incurred bone fractures or organ injuries outside the head and neck were excluded. There were multiple, heterogenous predictor variables. The primary outcome variable was mortality. Relative risk was used to determine independent risk factors of mortality. Statistical significance was deemed for P values less than .05. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 559 patients (mean age, 45.9 years) who suffered a Le Fort III fracture, of whom 15 patients (2.68%) died. Most patients were male (82.7%) middle-aged adults (42.9%) of White race (66.5%) within the lowest income quartile (31.7%) that lived in large metro areas (54.9%). Relative to males, females were nearly 62 times more likely to die (P < .01). Relative to privately insured subjects, uninsured subjects were 23 times (P < .05) more likely to die. Relative to weekday admissions, weekend admissions increased the risk of mortality by 8 times (P < .05). Cranial vault fractures (odds ratio, 7.24; P < .05) and upper cervical fractures (odds ratio, 63.27; P < .05) were risk factors for mortality. Relative to males, females were at an increased risk for mortality (relative risk [RR] 7.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.60, 19.61). Skull base fracture (RR 2.99, 95 CI 1.04, 8.63), cranial vault fracture (RR 3.04, 95 CI 1.07, 8.65), subdural hemorrhage (RR 2.98, 95 CI 1.10, 8.05), subarachnoid hemorrhage (RR 6.73, 95 CI 2.34, 19.35), and injury of blood vessels at neck level (RR 13.24, 95 CI 2.46, 71.16) were each risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial injury was not a risk factor for mortality. Instead, cranial vault fractures and skull base fractures increased the risk for mortality. In addition, uninsured patients and female patients were each at an increased risk for mortality.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Múltiples , Fracturas Maxilares , Fracturas Craneales , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Múltiples/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 41: 309, 2022.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35855048

RESUMEN

Introduction: facial injuries are a public health problem, both physically and psychologically, characterized by a variety of injuries and sometimes by severe esthetic or functional sequelae. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiological and tomodensitometric aspects of maxillofacial fractures in Mopti. Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional and descriptive study in the Department of Radiology of the Mopti Hospital from January 2019 to December 2019. All patients who had undergone maxillofacial CT scan for a trauma with fracture confirmed by CT scan during this period were included. The variables analyzed were age, sex, etiology and the types of fractures observed on CT scan. Data recording and analysis were carried out using SPSS version 20 and Excel 2013. Results: of a total of 120 patients, the mean age was 26.43 years with a standard deviation of 14.547. Men predominated (75%; n= 90). Road accidents were the leading cause of fractures (50%; n = 60). Occlusofacial fractures accounted for 38.33% (n= 46). Lefort II was the most common fracture (22.50%; n= 27). Conclusion: this study allowed us to identify the population groups most affected by maxillofacial fractures in the Mopti region: adolescents and young adults. Tomodensitometric results were dominated by occlusofacial fractures, in particular Lefort type II fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales , Fracturas Craneales , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Malí/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
5.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 25(3): 342-348, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35295058

RESUMEN

Background: Maxillofacial fractures and craniocerebral injuries are common in patients with head trauma. These are injuries with high mortality and morbidity. Therefore, patients with head trauma should be evaluated early with a multidisciplinary approach. Aim: The association between frontal and maxillary bone fractures and concurrent craniocerebral injuries were investigated in patients presenting with head trauma in this study. The data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. Methods and Material: Age and gender distributions were evaluated in frontal and maxillary fractures. Concomitant craniocerebral injuries were investigated. Craniocerebral injuries were grouped as pneumocephalus, extra-axial, intra-axial injuries and brain edema. Craniocerebral injuries in frontal and maxillary fractures were compared statistically. Results: Frontal bone and maxillary bone fractures were detected in 24% and 95% of the patients. Coexistence of pneumocephalus and intra-axial injuries in frontal bone fracture was statistically significant. The association of frontal posterior wall fractures with pneumocephalus and parenchymal contusion was found to be statistically significant. In addition, the association of craniocerebral injuries were evaluated and statistically significant ones were determined. Conclusion: The presence of maxillofacial fractures in patients presenting with head trauma increases mortality and morbidity. Craniocerebral injuries can be life-threatening and delay the treatment of facial fractures. Upper facial bone fractures are significantly more common in craniocerebral injuries.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Fracturas Maxilares , Fracturas Craneales , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Humanos , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/complicaciones , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología
6.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 101(2): NP45-NP49, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757996

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study anterior nasal spine fractures, including the incidence, missed diagnosis rates, and relationship with shapes using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Two hundred cases of axial CT images performed for maxillofacial trauma were reviewed. The incidence, correct, and missed diagnosis rates of anterior nasal spine fractures were studied. The relationship between the fracture and the shape of the anterior nasal spine was also analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of anterior nasal spine fractures was 22.00% (44 of 200). The diagnostic accuracy was 4.55% (2 of 44) and the missed diagnosis rate was 95.45% (42 of 44). The fracture rates of the double rod, single rod, triangle, and irregular anterior nasal spine were 33.85% (22 of 65), 32.26% (10 of 31), 12.24% (12 of 98), and 0.00% (0 of 6), respectively. The double and single rod types of anterior nasal spine were most likely to be fractured than the type of triangle (χ2 = 11.05, 6.67, P < .0167). No fracture was found in the irregular type of anterior nasal spine. CONCLUSION: Anterior nasal spine fractures are not rare and the high missed diagnostic rate results from unfamiliarity with the structure. Double and single rod types of anterior nasal spines are easy to fracture. Bony reconstruction and thin thickness of CT images are necessary for diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Nariz/diagnóstico por imagen , Nariz/lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Incidencia , Masculino , Maxilar/anatomía & histología , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Erróneo , Nariz/anatomía & histología , Adulto Joven
7.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 147(5): 777e-786e, 2021 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Naso-orbitoethmoid fractures associated with ipsilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures are more challenging injuries than zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures alone. However, there is a paucity of information on this complex fracture pattern in the pediatric population. This study investigated the cause, treatment, and outcomes of combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and naso-orbitoethmoid fractures versus isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in pediatric patients. METHODS: This was a 25-year retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who presented to a single institution with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Baseline patient demographics and clinical information, and concomitant injuries, treatment/operative management, and postoperative complications/deformities were recorded and compared between patients with combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and naso-orbitoethmoid fractures and patients with isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were identified to have had zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in the authors' 25-year study period, of whom 46 had adequate clinical documentation and follow-up. Seventeen patients had combined zygomaticomaxillary complex-naso-orbitoethmoid fractures, of whom six had panfacial fractures. Both patient groups (zygomaticomaxillary complex only and combined zygomaticomaxillary complex-naso-orbitoethmoid fractures) were similar in terms of demographics. However, a significantly greater proportion of combined fracture patients experienced postoperative complications compared to isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture patients, even after excluding those with panfacial fractures (87.5 percent versus 35.3 percent; p < 0.001). Enophthalmos (37.5 percent) and midface growth restriction (37.5 percent) were the two most common complications/deformities in all combined fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-impact trauma can lead to zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with associated naso-orbitoethmoid fractures in children. This injury pattern was found to cause significantly greater postoperative morbidity than isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures alone. Thus, pediatric patients presenting with this complex facial fracture pattern should be closely monitored. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.


Asunto(s)
Hueso Etmoides/lesiones , Fracturas Múltiples/etiología , Fracturas Múltiples/cirugía , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Hueso Nasal/lesiones , Fracturas Orbitales/etiología , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Fracturas Cigomáticas/etiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas Maxilares/complicaciones , Fracturas Orbitales/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas Cigomáticas/complicaciones
8.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 48: e20202581, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470368

RESUMEN

Understanding the cause, severity, and elapsed time for the restoration of the functions of maxillofacial injuries can contribute to the establishment of clinical priorities aiming at effective treatment and further prevention of facial trauma. The objective of this study was to understand the factors associated with the restoration of mastication, ocular, and nasal functions in the face of trauma victims, estimating their recovery time after surgical treatment. We analyzed 114 medical records of patients treated at the Hospital Montenegro, who attended follow-up consultations for up to 180 days. For analysis of the recovery time, we performed survival analysis, followed by COX analysis. We observed that half of the patients recovered their functions within 20 days. The average time for recovery from trauma in the zygomatic-orbital-malar-nasal complex was 11 days, and in the maxillary-mandibular complex, 21 days (HR: 1.5 [0.99 2.3], p = 0.055). Although functional reestablishment has reached high rates after the surgical approach, it is necessary to analyze the failing cases, as well as the economic impacts and the prevention strategies associated with facial trauma, to improve the service to the population.


Asunto(s)
Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Hueso Nasal/cirugía , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Fracturas Cigomáticas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Huesos Faciales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hueso Nasal/lesiones , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología , Fracturas Orbitales/etiología , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven , Fracturas Cigomáticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/etiología
9.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(1)2021 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509889

RESUMEN

Electronic cigarettes (also known as e-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems) were invented in China in 2003 then introduced to the British market in 2007. They remain popular among the public and are deemed to be effective in reducing tobacco smoking (the UK being one of the first countries to embrace them in a harm reduction policy). However, reports in the media of e-cigarettes exploding are of concern, considering the potential functional and psychological impairment that lifelong disfigurement will cause, especially given their uptake among people of any age. We present a case of this rare, but dramatic, effect of e-cigarette use as a warning to the public.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/etiología , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Explosiones , Fracturas Conminutas/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas de los Dientes/etiología , Fracturas Conminutas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/etiología , Mucosa Bucal/lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Fracturas de los Dientes/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Dientes/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Dientes/etiología , Raíz del Diente/lesiones , Adulto Joven
10.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(5_suppl): 420S-426S, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31619078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the epidemiological features, clinical diagnosis, and treatment of 610 patients with maxillofacial fractures, while providing a reference for the prevention and optimized treatment of maxillofacial fractures. METHODS: Data of patients with maxillofacial fractures who were treated and followed up at the Second People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture from June 2012 to April 2018 were summarized. The epidemiological features, clinical manifestations, fracture sites, treatment methods, and results were analyzed. RESULTS: The highest incidence was in the age range of 20 to 49 years. The main cause of fracture was traffic injury. Mandibular fractures accounted for 37.77%, zygoma and zygomatic arch fractures for 37.00%, and maxillary fractures for 21.19%. Atypical zygomatic arch fractures were more common in the maxilla, followed by Le Fort I and II fractures. Closed fractures accounted for 85.97%. Many (73.39%) patients were treated with computed tomography 3-dimensional (3D)-mediated precision modified incision internal fixation with satisfactory results. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of maxillofacial fractures among young men, especially in summer, with the most common injuries being traffic-related injuries. The most common site is the mandible, followed by the zygomatic arch, zygomatic complex, and maxilla. Computed tomography 3D-mediated precision modified incision internal fixation can achieve satisfactory results.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/epidemiología , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Incidencia , Masculino , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/etiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven , Fracturas Cigomáticas/etiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/cirugía
11.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 122(6): 561-565, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035710

RESUMEN

The frequency of midface and frontobasal fractures has increased over the past 40 years despite the improvement and stringent regulation implemented on modern safety equipment (belts, helmets…). This observation might be correlated with the progress of radiodiagnosis tools. Literature was reviewed according to Prisma guidelines. We searched for reviewed articles, published between January 2000 and December 2017, through Medline (Pubmed) online databases and ScienceDirect, using the following MeSH Keywords: "Le Fort classification", "Le Fort fracture", "Frontobasal fracture", "skull base fracture", "Midface Fractures". Among 652 patients with frontobasal fractures, 125 (19.1%) were associated with a Le Fort fracture. 59 (9%) were associated with Le Fort III fracture, 51 (7.8%) with Le Fort II fracture and 15 (2.3%) with Le Fort I fracture. When frontobasal fractures were associated with midfacial fractures, we found 18 cerebrospinal fluid leaks (11.8 %) and 19 cases of meningitis (12.5 %). When only the frontobasal area was involved, there were 6 cerebrospinal fluid leaks (4.3 %) and 6 meningitis (4.3 %). Our results highlight a regular association between Le Fort fractures and frontobasal fractures for stages II and stage III of Le Fort fractures and also found a higher rate of neuro-septic complication. Further research shall investigate treatment and monitoring recommendations fitting modern epidemiology of craniofacial traumatology.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología
12.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 48: e20202581, 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1155375

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Understanding the cause, severity, and elapsed time for the restoration of the functions of maxillofacial injuries can contribute to the establishment of clinical priorities aiming at effective treatment and further prevention of facial trauma. The objective of this study was to understand the factors associated with the restoration of mastication, ocular, and nasal functions in the face of trauma victims, estimating their recovery time after surgical treatment. We analyzed 114 medical records of patients treated at the Hospital Montenegro, who attended follow-up consultations for up to 180 days. For analysis of the recovery time, we performed survival analysis, followed by COX analysis. We observed that half of the patients recovered their functions within 20 days. The average time for recovery from trauma in the zygomatic-orbital-malar-nasal complex was 11 days, and in the maxillary-mandibular complex, 21 days (HR: 1.5 [0.99 2.3], p = 0.055). Although functional reestablishment has reached high rates after the surgical approach, it is necessary to analyze the failing cases, as well as the economic impacts and the prevention strategies associated with facial trauma, to improve the service to the population.


RESUMO O entendimento da causa, da gravidade e do tempo decorrido para o restabelecimento das funções de lesões maxilofaciais pode contribuir para o estabelecimento de prioridades clínicas objetivando o efetivo tratamento e prevenção dos traumatismos de face. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi compreender quais os fatores associados ao restabelecimento das funções mastigatórias, oculares e nasais em vítimas de trauma de face, estimando o tempo para recuperação das funções, após o tratamento cirúrgico. Foram analisados 114 prontuários de pacientes atendidos no Hospital de Montenegro que compareceram às consultas de acompanhamento por até 180 dias. Para a análise do tempo para a recuperação, foi realizada a análise de sobrevida, seguida da análise de COX. Observou-se que metade dos pacientes recuperaram as funções em até 20 dias, sendo que o tempo médio para recuperação dos traumas no complexo zigomático-orbitário-malar-nasal foi de 11 dias e do complexo maxilo - mandibular de 21 dias (HR: 1,5 (0,99 - 2,3) p=0,055). Embora o restabelecimento das funções tenha atingido taxas elevadas após abordagem cirúrgicas, faz-se necessária a análise dos casos de insucessos bem como os impactos econômicos e as estratégias de prevenção associados aos traumas de face a fim de qualificar o serviço prestado à população.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Fracturas Cigomáticas/cirugía , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Hueso Nasal/cirugía , Fracturas Orbitales/etiología , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/etiología , Fracturas Cigomáticas/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Huesos Faciales/cirugía , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hueso Nasal/lesiones
13.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 22(4): 249-254, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250646

RESUMEN

Importance: The nasal bone is one of the most commonly fractured bones of the midface. However, the frequency of coincident fractures of adjacent bones such as the frontal process of the maxillary bone, nasal septum, and medial or inferior orbital walls has not been fully evaluated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of fractures of adjacent structures in the setting of a nasal bone fracture. Second, we propose a new classification system of nasal bone fractures with involvement of adjacent bony structures. Design, Setting, and Participants: One thousand, one hundred ninety-three patients with midfacial fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of fractures of the nasal bone and the incidence of coincident fractures of the frontal process of maxilla, bony nasal septum, medial, or inferior orbital walls were analyzed. Exposure: All patients included in the study presented with nasal trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coincident fractures of adjacent midfacial structures were assessed, and a new classification of midfacial fractures based on computed tomography (CT) scan images was proposed. Results: Among the 1193 cases, bilateral fractures of the nasal bone were most common (69.24%), and coexistent fracture of the frontal process of the maxilla and bony nasal septum was 66.89% and 42.25%, respectively. Coincident fracture of the orbital walls was observed in 16.51% of cases. The major etiology of fracture for the younger and elderly groups was falls, compared with assault as the most common etiology in the adult group. A classification scheme was generated in which fractures of the nasal bone were divided into five types depending on coexisting fractures of adjacent structures. Conclusions and Relevance: External force applied to the nasal bone can also lead to coexistent fracture of adjacent bony structures including the frontal process of the maxilla, nasal septum, and orbital walls. The proposed classification of nasal fracture based on CT imaging helps to incorporate coincident disruption of adjacent structures.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Hueso Nasal/lesiones , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Fracturas Maxilares/clasificación , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/clasificación , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/etiología , Tabique Nasal/lesiones , Fracturas Orbitales/clasificación , Fracturas Orbitales/diagnóstico , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología , Fracturas Orbitales/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/clasificación , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Adulto Joven
15.
Biomed Res Int ; 2019: 9024763, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Epidemiology of maxillofacial fractures (MFF) varies between populations. This study investigated the epidemiology of MFF treated at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Unit, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). METHODS: A retrospective review of 473 medical records of patients with MFF treated from June 2013 to December 2015 was conducted. Information on demographic characteristics of patients, aetiology of injury, types of MFF, and treatment was obtained. Descriptive analysis, Pearson's chi-squared test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were conducted. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Most patients treated for MFF were males (82.2%), aged 30 and below (63.1%), and from Malay ethnic (97.4%). Road traffic accident was the most common cause of MFF (83.1%), with motorcycle accident accounting for most injuries (73.6%). Orbital wall fracture was the most frequent MFF type (51.2%). About half of MFF patients (51.4%) were treated conservatively. Patients aged more than 20 years old were at higher odds of sustaining orbital wall fracture (AOR= 1.76; 95% CI: 1.214-2.558; P= 0.003) but were at lower odds of sustaining mandibular fracture (AOR= 0.47; 95% CI: 0.315-0.695; P= 0.001) than patients who are 20 years old and younger. Helmet use among motorcyclists was significantly associated with the nasal, orbital wall, and maxillary sinus wall fractures (P= 0.006, 0.010, and 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Motorcycle accident was the most common cause of MFF in Kelantan, Malaysia. Ages of patient and helmet use were associated with the type of MFF sustained. This study provides important information to facilitate the planning of MFF prevention strategies among motorcyclists and emphasizes the importance of using a helmet when riding a motorcycle.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Malasia/epidemiología , Masculino , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/terapia , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
16.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 21(12): 1570-1575, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30560819

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Midfacial fractures are extremely important oral and maxillofacial problems because they take varied forms and are frequently accompanied by major long-term esthetic or functional complications. Their etiology and epidemiology vary significantly in the literature, and the main causes are varied by population. The aim of this study is to identify the main traumatic etiology of midfacial fractures, along with the main categories of affected patients in our geographical area, in order to establish the need for measures that can prevent fractures in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study over a 10-year period in 379 patients. Data were extracted from the patients' charts, and the following variables were taken into consideration: sex, age, environment of origin, education level, and traumatic etiology. RESULTS: Midfacial fractures most frequently affected the 20-29 years age group (31.93%), male sex (n = 333, 87.86%, M:F = 7.23:1), patients from urban areas (n = 206, 54.35%), and patients without education (46.70%). The most frequent etiology was interpersonal violence (44.85%), followed by fall trauma (16.62%) and road traffic accidents (15.30%). Statistical correlations evidenced that urban environment favors midfacial fractures caused by interpersonal violence and road traffic accidents or sports injuries, while in rural areas, domestic accidents and animal attacks are predominant (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming incidence of interpersonal violence in our population is currently a major public health problem. Implementing laws and initiating national programs for the prevention of interpersonal violence would lead to a considerable reduction of midfacial fractures in the Western Romanian population.


Asunto(s)
Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Traumatismos Faciales/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Fracturas Orbitales/etiología , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/etiología , Niño , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rumanía/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo
17.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 46(10): 1828-1833, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30170959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate maxillary stability following Le Fort I osteotomy using postero-superior movement after pterygoid plate fracture. Additionally the authors sought to analyze the postoperative changes at the intentional pterygoid plate fracture site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with class III deformities treated with total maxillary setback at the Lefort I level were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study. Relative changes in measurement points were identified on cone-beam computed tomographic scans (CBCT) as well as lateral cephalograms. The outcome variables were determined as changes at measurement points obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The average posterior repositioning of ANS in the 36 patients was 1.78 mm and the mean superior repositioning at PNS was 2.78 mm. The maximal recurrence rate was less than 10% at the 6 months postoperative time point. The intentional fracture site of the pterygoid plates healed with a linear pattern. There were no major complications such as airway edema, hemorrhage and nerve damage reported over the 6-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Intentional fracture of the pterygoid plates has a role in the retropositioning of the maxilla with good healing at the fracture site, little relapse and satisfactory postoperative stability.


Asunto(s)
Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Osteotomía Le Fort/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/cirugía , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
18.
Dent Med Probl ; 55(1): 69-74, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30152638

RESUMEN

The removal of the upper third molar is a procedure commonly performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Maxillary third molars are generally less difficult to extract than mandibular third molars. The surgical removal of maxillary third molars is usually associated with low complication rates and low morbidity. This procedure involves the risk of developing complications such as oroantral communication, displacement into adjacent anatomic spaces, fracture of the maxillary tuberosity, and root fracture. Orthopantomograms are the standard preoperative imaging modality, but there is no proven tool for predicting oroantral communication. New possibilities have been offered by cone-beam computed tomography, which is increasingly used in dentistry and is an innovative technique that provides more information as it eliminates the superimposition of surrounding structures and allows the acquisition of 3-dimensional images and their qualitative assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to assess risk factors during the extraction of the upper third molar using orthopantomograms and cone-beam computed tomography.


Asunto(s)
Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Humanos , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Oroantral/etiología , Radiografía Panorámica , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de los Dientes/etiología , Raíz del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Raíz del Diente/lesiones
19.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 23(2): e248-e255, 2018 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476683

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changing pattern in characteristics of maxillofacial fractures and concomitant injuries in Western Libya During revolution and to assess the association between mechanism of injury and fracture patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and radiographs of 187 patients treated for maxillofacial fractures from January 2010 to December 2012 was performed, there were 326 fractures in 187 patients. RESULTS: The male: female ratio was 6:1. Most fractures occurred in patients aged 11 to 40 years, and few injuries occurred in patients aged > 50 years. Most fractures occurred from motor vehicle accidents, and other most frequent causes included assault, gunshot, and fall injuries. Most maxillofacial fractures involved the mandible, zygomatic complex, or maxilla. Most mandibular fractures occurred at the parasymphysis, angle, or condyle. Associated injuries most frequently involved the head, chest, and extremities. Most patients were treated with open reduction (132 patients [71%]), and 26 patients (14%) were treated nonoperatively. There were 21 complications (11%). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, motor vehicle accidents were the most frequent cause of maxillofacial fracture in western Libya, possibly because of the lack of seat belt legislation. Interpersonal violence was a less frequent cause of maxillofacial fracture, possibly because of the religious restriction on alcohol consumption.


Asunto(s)
Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Desórdenes Civiles , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Libia , Masculino , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Adulto Joven
20.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 76(5): 1044-1054, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29291388

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Le Fort-type fractures are very rare in children, and there is a paucity of literature presenting their frequency and characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine the etiology, frequency, and fracture patterns of children with severe facial trauma associated with pterygoid plate fractures in a pediatric cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all children aged younger than 16 years with pterygoid plate and facial fractures who presented to our institute between 1990 and 2010. Patient charts and radiologic records were reviewed for demographic and fracture characteristics. Patients were categorized into 2 groups as per facial fracture pattern: non-Le Fort-type fractures (group A) and Le Fort-type fractures (group B). Other variables including dentition age, frontal sinus development, mechanism of injury, injury severity, and concomitant injuries were recorded. Univariate methods were used to compare groups. RESULTS: We identified 24 children; 25% were girls, and 20.8% were of nonwhite race. Most presented with Le Fort-type fracture patterns (group B, 66.7%). Age was significantly different between group A and group B (mean, 5.9 years and 9.9 years, respectively; P = .009). No significant differences in Injury Severity Score, rate of operative repair, and length of stay were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with severe facial fractures and pterygoid plate fractures presented with Le Fort-type fracture patterns in our cohort. The mean age of children with Le Fort-type fractures was greater than in those with non-Le Fort-type patterns. However, Le Fort-type fractures did occur in younger children with deciduous and mixed dentition.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...