RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hookah consumption is harmful to human health and can cause various diseases. Developing lung cancer and other lung diseases are one of the health consequences of hookah consumption. Measuring the perceived risk for being diagnosed with these conditions among hookah users is necessary. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the perceived risk of lung cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in hookah users in Iran. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted with a descriptive-analytical approach on 340 hookah users between January-May 2023. These people were recruited through convenience sampling. The information on the perceived risk of participants was collected through a questionnaire on the perceived risk of lung cancer and COPD. Data were analyzed through descriptive tests and multiple linear regression tests. These analyses were performed using Stata statistical software version 17. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of the perceived risk for lung cancer was 8.41 ± 5.50 and for COPD was 8.51 ± 5.58 out of 20 possible scores. The results of multiple linear regression generally showed that the using other type of tobacco (ß = 3.14, p < 0.0001), 2 or more use of hookah in past month (ß=-3.41, p = 0.025), unskilled workers (ß = 1.79, p = 0.017), married smokers (ß=-1.31, p = 0.026), negative attitude toward hookah (ß = 0.46, p < 0.0001) were the predictive variables regarding to lung cancer perceived risk. In line with COPD the using other type of tobacco (ß = 3.47, p < 0.0001), once a month use of hookah in past month(ß=-3.74, p = 0.041) and twice or more use of hookah in past month (ß=-4.82, p = 0.008), smokers in contemplation stage (ß = 3.91, p < 0.0001), female smokers (ß = 3.08, p < 0.0001), unskilled workers (ß = 2.42, p = 0.007), negative attitude toward hookah (ß = 0.46, p < 0.0001) were the predictive variables to COPD perceived risk. CONCLUSION: In general, the perceived risk of developing lung cancer and COPD among hookah users was low. Therefore, it is necessary to provide widespread information about the potential harm of hookah in causing lung cancer and COPD, at the community level.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Modelos Lineales , Pipas de Agua/estadística & datos numéricos , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of waterpipe smoking (WPS) has been increasing worldwide. This trend is alarming as WPS can negatively impact cardiovascular health. In the present study, we explored the association between WPS and the presence and severity of CAD. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography at Tehran Heart Center between April 2021 and May 2022. Patients with a previous history of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary surgery were excluded. Waterpipe smokers were matched with non-smokers based on age, gender, and cigarette smoking using a 1:4 propensity score matching model. Stenosis ≥ 50% in any coronary artery was considered a CAD diagnosis. Gensini score was also calculated to measure the severity of the CAD. RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 8699 patients, including 380 waterpipe smokers. After matching, 1520 non-smokers with similar propensity scores to the waterpipe smokers were selected. Waterpipe smokers were more likely to have CAD than non-smokers (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.04-1.60, P = 0.021). In addition, WPS increased the natural logarithm of the Gensini score by 1.24 (95% CI: 1.04-1.48, P = 0.014) in patients with atherosclerotic coronary disease. CONCLUSION: WPS may increase the risk of CAD independent of age, gender, and cigarette smoking. In addition, among patients with any degree of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries (GS > 0), WPS may lead to higher average GS, suggesting more severe atherosclerosis.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Puntaje de Propensión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Irán/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Prevalencia , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Fumadores , AdultoRESUMEN
Waterpipe tobacco (WPT) smoking is a public health concern, particularly among youth and young adults. The global spread of WPT use has surged because the introduction of pre-packaged flavored and sweetened WPT, which is widely marketed as a safer tobacco alternative. Besides flavorants and sugars, WPT additives include humectants, which enhance the moisture and sweetness of WPT, act as solvents for flavors, and impart smoothness to the smoke, thus increasing appeal to users. In the United States, unlike cigarette tobacco flavoring (with the exception of menthol), there is no FDA product standard or policy in place prohibiting sales of flavored WPT. Research has shown that the numerous fruit, candy, and alcohol flavors added to WPT entice individuals to experience those flavors, putting them at an increased risk of exposure to WPT smoke-related toxicants. Additionally, burning charcoal briquettes-used as a heating source for WPT-contributes to the harmful health effects of WPT smoking. This review presents existing evidence on the potential toxicity resulting from humectants, sugars, and flavorants in WPT, and from the charcoal used to heat WPT. The review discusses relevant studies of inhalation toxicity in animal models and of biomarkers of exposure in humans. Current evidence suggests that more data are needed on toxicant emissions in WPT smoke to inform effective tobacco regulation to mitigate the adverse impact of WPT use on human health.
Asunto(s)
Carbón Orgánico , Aromatizantes , Edulcorantes , Tabaco para Pipas de Agua , Humanos , Aromatizantes/toxicidad , Edulcorantes/toxicidad , Animales , Higroscópicos/toxicidad , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: There has been an increasing trend of using noncigarette products, including waterpipe tobacco (WTP), worldwide. While cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for numerous cancers, little is known about the association between WTP smoking and cancer mortality. Objective: To assess the association between WTP smoking and risk of cancer mortality in Vietnam. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was based on data from the Hanoi Prospective Cohort Study, an ongoing study with a median (range) follow-up of 11.0 (0.1-11.6) years for participants aged 15 years or older in Northern Vietnam from 2007 through 2019. Data were analyzed from June 1 to September 1, 2023. Exposures: Tobacco smoking and WTP smoking statuses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall and site-specific cancer mortality. Cox proportional regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs for the associations between WTP smoking alone, cigarette smoking alone, and dual WTP and cigarette smoking and the risk of cancer death. Results: A total of 554 cancer deaths were identified among the 39â¯401 study participants (mean [SD] age, 40.4 [18.8] years; 20 616 females [52.3%]). In multivariable models, compared with never smokers, ever smokers had a significantly increased risk of cancer mortality (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.48-2.35). Exclusive WTP smokers had the highest risk of cancer mortality compared with never smokers (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.07-3.43). Risk of cancer mortality was higher for dual smokers of WTP and cigarettes (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.53-2.76) than for exclusive cigarette smokers (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.41-2.45). As most smokers (95.6% [8897 of 9312]) were male, these patterns were more apparent in male participants. Compared with never smokers, exclusive WTP smoking among males was associated with an elevated risk of death from liver cancer (HR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.25-6.85), lung cancer (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.08-5.88), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.27-6.12), and stomach cancer (HR, 4.11; 95% CI, 2.04-8.27). For exclusive WTP smokers, the risk of cancer mortality was highest among those who smoked 11 to 15 sessions per day (HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.03-5.75), started smoking at age 26 to 30 years (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.63-6.11), smoked for 9 to 20 years (HR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.16-7.56), and smoked 61 to 160 sessions annually (HR, 3.68; 95% CI, 2.38-5.71). For males, the risk of cancer death was lower for those who had quit smoking for more than 10 years, compared with those who quit smoking within 1 year (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.66; P for trend < .001). Conclusion and Relevance: In this cohort study in Vietnam, WTP smoking alone or in combination with cigarette smoking was associated with an increased risk of cancer death due to liver cancer, lung cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and stomach cancer. A tailored program to control WTP smoking is warranted in Vietnam and low- and middle-income countries with a high prevalence of smoking and modest resources to address smoking-related issues.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vietnam/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Prospectivos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Tabaco para Pipas de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Objectives: To determine the associations between waterpipe use, duration, and intensity of use with prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome and its components (increased waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting glucose, blood pressure and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Methods: We conducted cross-sectional and prospective analyses using data from the Pars Cohort Study in southern Iran, encompassing 9,264 participants at the baseline, and 5,002 randomly selected in a repeated follow-up. We used multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, wealth score, physical activity and cigarette pack-years to report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 9,264 participants, 3,119 (33.7%) had metabolic syndrome, and 3,482 (37.6%) had ever smoked waterpipe, with both more common in women than in men. In adjusted models, former waterpipe use was significantly associated with prevalence (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.23-1.68) and incidence (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.19-2.06) of the metabolic syndrome while current waterpipe use was not. Past use was associated with increased risk in all components of metabolic syndrome; current use was associated with increases in all except high blood glucose and hypertension. Past waterpipe users had higher waterpipe use intensity (before quitting) in comparison with current users (2.3 vs. 2.0 waterpipes per day, p < 0.01) and had started waterpipe smoking at a younger age (27.2 vs. 30.1 years, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Waterpipe use was associated with metabolic syndrome and its components, especially among former users potentially due to higher intensity and earlier initiation of use.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Metabólico , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Prevalencia , Adulto , Incidencia , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Irán/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Glucemia/análisis , Presión SanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Salivary oxidative stress has been extensively studied with attempts to correlate changes in the oxidative stress markers with local and systemic factors, including smoking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of two forms of smoking, cigarettes and waterpipe smoking (WPS), on selected oxidative stress biomarkers in saliva. METHODS: Three groups of participants were enrolled into the study, controls (never smokers), cigarette smokers and WPS. Participants were clinically free from periodontitis and systemic conditions known to affect the saliva constituents. Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected according to a standard protocol and concentrations of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), myeloperoxidase (MPO), malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and cortisol. The one-way ANOVA test was used to compare the levels of each oxidative stress biomarker between the three study groups and the hierarchical linear regression analysis was used to test the levels of salivary cortisol for prediction of other oxidative stress biomarkers. Significance levels were set at 95% confidence intervals and probability values ≤0.05. RESULTS: 8-OHdG was highest in WPS group (mean±SE 11,030.35±1829.16 pg/mL) while MDA and cortisol levels were highest in the cigarette smokers group (mean±SE 3.33±0.52 µM and 3.99±0.48 ng/mL, respectively) and MPO was highest in the control group (mean±SE 7.760±1.55 ng/mL). WPS group showed the highest TAC (mean±SE 0.3±0.03 mM). However, none of the tested makers reached a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Despite subtle changes in some biomarkers, the salivary oxidative stress does not appear to be significantly influenced by smoking habits in periodontitis-free smokers.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Estrés Oxidativo , Saliva , Humanos , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Saliva/química , Saliva/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Periodontitis/metabolismo , Malondialdehído/metabolismo , Malondialdehído/análisis , 8-Hidroxi-2'-Desoxicoguanosina/metabolismo , Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Peroxidasa/análisis , Fumar/metabolismo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Hidrocortisona/análisisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association between lung cancer and waterpipe smoking, which is an emerging global public health concern. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre case-control study. METHODS: This study included 627 cases and 3477 controls from the Iranian Study of Opium and Cancer (IROPICAN) study, which was conducted between 2017 and 2020. One frequency-matched control for each lung cancer patient was selected by age, gender and residential place; however, this study used controls of four cancer types in the analyses. The multivariable logistic regression model estimated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additional analyses were performed among 181 lung cancer cases and 2141 controls who were not cigarette smokers or opium or nass/pipe users. RESULTS: The odds of lung cancer were higher among waterpipe smokers than never-smokers (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7). Results showed a higher OR of lung cancer for those who smoked the waterpipe daily (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.0), smoked more than two heads per day (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8-4.0), had smoked for >20 years (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), smoked more than 20 head-years (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.9-4.1) and initiated smoking before the age of 30 years (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.5). The association was only statistically significant for squamous cell carcinomas (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7). Furthermore, this study observed a higher OR of lung cancer among exclusive waterpipe smokers (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.6, 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe smoking was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The association was stronger with higher frequency, duration and intensity of exposure to waterpipe smoking. The association increases in exclusive waterpipe smokers, which is likely due to controlling for residual confounding by cigarette smoking and opium consumption, and higher exposure levels in this subpopulation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , AncianoRESUMEN
Rates of waterpipe use increase with very little data reporting any potential health consequences. The current study, a large case-control study, of 4,194 patients from Iran denotes an elevated risk of bladder cancer in exclusive waterpipe smokers compared with non-users. Additional studies are needed to further understand the risk waterpipe smoking has on bladder cancer. See related article by Hadji et al., p. 509.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fumadores , Irán/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
Smoking of classic cigarettes has been well-established as a health risk factor, including cardiovascular, neurological, and pulmonary diseases. Adverse effects on human reproduction have also been shown. Smokers are assumed to have a significantly lower chance of pregnancy, however, the impact of smoking on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatment outcomes is controversial. Moreover, smoking habits have changed during the last decades since e-cigarettes and hookahs, or water pipes, have become very popular, yet little is known regarding vaping or hookah-smoking patients undergoing MAR treatments. This prospective study aimed to examine the presence of benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, and its main metabolite, cotinine, in human follicular fluid (FF) in non-smoking, smoking, and vaping/hookah-smoking patients and to evaluate the impact on female fertility. Human FF samples were collected from 320 women subjected to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles due to male subfertility. Gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry was used to analyse the presence of benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, and cotinine. A questionnaire was provided to assess patient consumption behaviour and to identify (1) non-smoking patients, (2) patients who consumed cigarettes, and (3) patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U Test. Nicotine was present in 22 (6.8%) and cotinine in 65 (20.3%) of the 320 samples. The nicotine and cotinine concentrations per sample ranged from 0 to 26.3 ng/ml and 0-363.0 ng/ml, respectively. Benzo[a]pyrene was not detectable in any of the samples analysed. Nicotine and cotinine were also present in the FF of patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. The clinical pregnancy rate, fertilization and maturation rates, and number of oocytes per oocyte pick-up were not statistically significantly different between non-smoking, smoking, or vaping/hookah-smoking patients. Smoking and the accumulation of smoking toxins in the FF have no impact on the outcome of MAR treatments-neither the clinical pregnancy rate, maturation and fertilization rates, nor the number of retrieved oocytes were affected. For the first time, nicotine and cotinine were quantified in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs. Since vaping liquids and hookah tobaccos contain potentially harmful substances, other adverse effects cannot be excluded.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03414567.
Asunto(s)
Cotinina , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Nicotina , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/efectos adversos , Cotinina/análisis , Nicotina/análisis , Nicotina/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Embarazo , Líquido Folicular/metabolismo , Líquido Folicular/química , Benzo(a)pireno/análisis , Masculino , Vapeo/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the difference between carboxyhemoglobin (CO-Hb) acute poisoning caused by waterpipe vs non-waterpipe exposures as they relate to demographics, clinical presentations and outcome of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) at the Lebanon. PATIENTS: All adult patients presenting with a CO-Hb level ≥ 10 between January 2019 and August 2023 with exposure types stratified as waterpipe or non-waterpipe. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 111 ED visits were identified. Among these, 73.9% were attributed to waterpipe exposure, while 26.1% were non-waterpipe sources. These included cigarette smoking (17.2%), burning coal (24.1%), fire incidents (3.6%), gas leaks (6.9%), heating device use (10.3%), and undocumented sources (37.9%). Patients with waterpipe-related carbon monoxide exposure were younger (41 vs 50 years, p = 0.015) women (63.4 vs 41.4%, p = 0.039) with less comorbidities compared to non-waterpipe exposures (22.2 vs 41.4%, p = 0.047). Waterpipe smokers were more likely to present during the summer (42.7 vs 13.8%, p = 0.002) and have shorter ED length of stays (3.9 vs 4.5 h, p = 0.03). A higher percentage of waterpipe smokers presented with syncope (52.4 vs 17.2%, p = 0.001) whereas cough/dyspnea were more common in non-waterpipe exposures (31 vs 9.8%, p = 0.006). The initial CO-Hb level was found to be significantly higher in waterpipe exposure as compared to non-waterpipe (19.7 vs 13.7, p = 0.004). Non-waterpipe exposures were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (24.1 vs 4.9%, p = 0.015). Waterpipe smokers had significantly higher odds of experiencing syncope, with a 5.74-fold increase in risk compared to those exposed to non-waterpipe sources (p = 0.004) irrespective of their CO-Hb level. Furthermore, males had significantly lower odds of syncope as compared to females, following carbon monoxide exposure (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.74). CONCLUSION: CO-Hb poisoning related to waterpipe smoking has distinctive features. Syncope is a commonly associated presentation that should solicit a focused social history in communities where waterpipe smoking is common. Furthermore, CO-Hb poisoning should remain on the differential in patients presenting with headache, syncope, dizziness, vomiting or shortness of breath, even outside of the non-waterpipe exposure peaks of winter season.
Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/diagnóstico , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiología , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/etiología , Monóxido de Carbono , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Síncope/etiología , Carboxihemoglobina/análisis , Disnea/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite the damaging effects of water pipe on physical health, there is little information about the potential harmful effects of this tobacco on stroke. This study aims to investigate the relationship between water pipe smoking and stroke. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted including Ovid SP, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases with focus on cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We reviewed all studies reporting on water pipe smoking and stroke. The funnel plot and the Egger regression test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: In the four eligible studies, there were a total of 2759 participants that 555 patients had at least once experienced stroke. Meta-analysis revealed positive association between water pipe smoking and stroke with pooled adjusted OR 2.79 (95% CI: 1.74-3.84; I 2 = 0 , p = . 741 ${I^2}\; = \;\;0,{\mathrm{\;}}p\;\; = {\mathrm{\;\;}}.741$ ) and the funnel plot shows asymmetry publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher effect of water pipe smoking on stroke compared to cigarette smoking and concluded that water pipe increases the risk of stroke by 2.79. Hence, because most of the water pipe consumer society is young, especially women, policies and decisions need to be taken to control the supply of this tobacco to the market and more provide education on the health problem of water pipe smoking. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides a higher effect of water pipe smoking on stroke. Physicians and researchers who intend to study in the field of stroke should better examine the effects of water pipe (including time of use, dose-response, long-term effects, and risk factors) on stroke.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Waterpipe smoking (WPS) has been associated with a variety of adverse health effects, consequences, and symptoms of nicotine dependence. This study aims to determine the prevalence of WPS dependence among Palestinian university waterpipe smoking students, their normative beliefs about WPS, and their relationship to dependence. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of current WPS university students at five major Palestinian universities was conducted from September to December 2022. Participants were recruited using convenient sampling, and data collection was carried out via an interviewer-administered questionnaire. We assessed students' WPS dependence using the Lebanese Waterpipe Dependence Scale. We used the Poisson regression model with robust variance to analyze factors independently associated with high WPS dependence. RESULTS: The study included 746 current WPS university students. Results revealed a high prevalence of WPS dependence, with 69.4% (95%CI: 66.0-72.7%) exhibiting high dependence. Factors contributing to high WPS dependence included dual cigarette smoking (aPR: 1.18; 95%CI: 1.12-1.25), studying medical sciences (aPR: 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.18), friends' approval of WPS (aPR: 1.25; 95%CI: 1.17-1.34), daily WPS frequency (aPR: 1.98; 95%CI: 1.39-2.23), spending more than 50% of daily allowance on WPS (aPR: 1.37; 95%CI: 1.10-1.64), and morning WPS sessions (aPR: 1.97; 95%CI: 1.31-2.27). The study highlighted the influence of social factors, such as peers' approval and perceived prevalence, on WPS dependence. CONCLUSIONS: WPS dependence is prevalent among university students, and it is associated with morning WPS, dual smoking, and increased WPS frequency. Notably, peer and cultural factors are essential primary motivators. As a result, it is critical to incorporate WPS considerations into Palestine's antismoking health promotion program. Therefore, it is vital to incorporate WPS into the Palestinian antismoking health promotion policy, and the health education of adolescents regarding the dangers of WPS should coincide with antismoking initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Universidades , Estudiantes , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist for the association between bladder cancers and waterpipe smoking, an emerging global public health concern. METHODS: We used the IROPICAN database in Iran and used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for cigarette smoking, opium use, and other confounding factors. In addition, we studied the association between exclusive waterpipe smoking and bladder cancer. RESULTS: We analyzed 717 cases and 3,477 controls and a subset of 215 patients and 2,145 controls who did not use opium or cigarettes. Although the OR adjusted for opium, cigarettes, and other tobacco products was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.20], we observed a statistically significant elevated risk in exclusive waterpipe smokers (OR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.72) compared with non-users of opium or any tobacco. Associations were strongest for smoking more than two heads/day (OR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.21-4.18) and for initiating waterpipe smoking at an age less than 20 (OR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.11-6.72). The OR for urothelial bladder cancer was higher in ex-smokers (OR = 2.35; 95% CI, 1.24-4.42) than in current smokers (OR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.72-3.15). All observed associations were consistently higher for urothelial histology. CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe smoking may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, notably among individuals who are not exposed to cigarette smoking and opium. IMPACT: The study provides compelling evidence that waterpipe smoking is a confirmed human carcinogen, demanding action from policymakers. See related In the Spotlight, p. 461.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Irán/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Opio , Nicotiana , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The global prevalence of waterpipe tobacco smoking is increasing. Although the cardiorespiratory, renal, and reproductive effects of waterpipe smoking (WPS) are well-documented, there is limited knowledge regarding its adverse impact on the liver. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the effects and potential mechanisms of WPS inhalation for one or four weeks on the liver. MAIN METHODS: Mice were exposed to WPS for 30 min per day, five days per week, while control mice were exposed to clean air. KEY FINDINGS: Analysis using light microscopy revealed the infiltration of immune cells (neutrophils and lymphocytes) accompanied by vacuolar hepatic degeneration upon WPS inhalation. At the four-week timepoint, electron microscopy analysis demonstrated an increased number of mitochondria with a concomitant pinching-off of hepatocyte plasma membranes. WPS exposure led to a significant rise in the activities of liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in the bloodstream. Additionally, WPS inhalation elevated lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species levels and disrupted the levels of the antioxidant glutathione in liver tissue homogenates. The concentration of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1ß, was significantly increased in the WPS-exposed group. Furthermore, WPS inhalation induced DNA damage and a significant increase in the levels of cleaved caspase-3, cytochrome C and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α along with alterations in the activity of mitochondrial complexes I, II, III and IV. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings provide evidence that WPS inhalation triggers changes in liver morphology, oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, apoptosis, and alterations in mitochondrial activity.
Asunto(s)
Lesión por Inhalación de Humo , Pipas de Agua , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Animales , Ratones , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Humo/efectos adversos , Hígado/metabolismoRESUMEN
Tobacco smoking is carcinogenic to humans. Besides cigarettes, the most common form of tobacco smoking, there was sparse evidence of waterpipe's carcinogenicity-induced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This study investigated the association between waterpipe smoking and NPC mortality. Our study followed up with 20,144 eligible man participants from nine northern Vietnam communes between 2007 and 2019. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to gather data on exclusive waterpipe and cigarette smoking and dietary intake using structured semi-quantitative food frequency and lifestyle questionnaires. Nasopharyngeal cancer was determined by accessing the medical records at the state health facilities. We estimated the Cox proportional hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals, HR (95% CI). The proportion of never smokers, exclusive waterpipe, exclusive cigarette, and dual waterpipe and cigarette smokers was 55.8%, 14.5%, 16.6%, and 13.1%, respectively. Exclusively waterpipe smokers increased the risk of NPC death compared to exclusively cigarette smokers, HR (95% CI): 4.51 (1.25, 16.31), p = 0.022. A dose-dependent positive relationship between NPC and exclusive waterpipe smoking was significantly seen for higher intensity HR (95% CI): 1.35 (1.07, 1.71), earlier age of smoking initiation HR (95% CI): 1.26 (1.06, 1.50), longer duration HR (95% CI): 1.31 (1.04, 1.66), and the cumulative number of a smoke lifetime HR (95% CI): 1.37 (1.08, 1.74). We observed a significant positive association between exclusive waterpipe smoking and NPC in men. The findings suggested that waterpipe smoking is likely more harmful than cigarettes in developing this cancer. A firm tobacco control against waterpipe smoking is highly recommended.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático , Vietnam/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/efectos adversos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WPS) inhalation has been shown to trigger endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects are still unknown. Here, we assessed the impact and underlying mechanism of WPS exposure for one month on endothelial dysfunction using aortic tissue of mice. The duration of the session was 30 min/day and 5 days/week. Control mice were exposed to air. Inhalation of WPS induced an increase in the number of macrophages and neutrophils and the concentrations of protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin (IL)-1beta, and glutathione in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Moreover, the concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF alpha, IL-6 and IL-1beta), adhesion molecules (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin and P-selectin) and markers of oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation, glutathione, superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide) in aortic homogenates of mice exposed to WPS were significantly augmented compared with air exposed mice. Likewise, the concentration of galectin-3 was significantly increased in the aortic homogenates of mice exposed to WPS compared with control group. WPS inhalation induced vascular DNA damage assessed by comet assay and apoptosis characterized by a significant increase in cleaved caspase-3. While the aortic expression of phosphorylated nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) was significantly increased following WPS inhalation, the concentration of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) was significantly decreased in WPS group compared with air-exposed group. In conclusion, our study provided evidence that WPS inhalation triggers lung injury and endothelial inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis which were associated with nuclear factor-kappaB activation and SIRT1 down-regulation.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar , Enfermedades Vasculares , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Animales , Ratones , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Sirtuina 1 , Glutatión/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/metabolismoRESUMEN
This study compares the impact of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) and their placements on waterpipe parts (device, tobacco and charcoal packages) on health communication outcomes between waterpipe smokers and nonsmokers in Lebanon. An online randomized crossover experimental study was conducted among young adults (n = 403, August 2021) who observed three conditions of HWLs: pictorial HWLs on the tobacco package, pictorial HWLs on all waterpipe's parts and text-only HWL on the tobacco package in random order. Participants completed post-exposure assessments of health communication outcomes after each image. Using linear mixed models, we examined the differences in the effect of HWL conditions on several outcomes (i.e. warning reactions) between waterpipe smokers and nonsmokers, controlling for confounders (i.e. age, sex). Nonsmokers reported greater attention (ß = 0.54 [95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.82]), cognitive elaboration (0.31 [0.05-0.58]) and social interaction (0.41 [0.18-0.65]) for pictorial HWLs on the tobacco packages than text-only compared with smokers. Pictorial HWLs on three parts versus one part elicited higher cognitive reactions and perceived message effectiveness in nonsmokers compared with waterpipe smokers. These findings provide valuable information for policymakers about the potential of implementing HWLs specific to waterpipes to prevent their use among young adults and limit tobacco-related morbidity and mortality in Lebanon.
Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Fumadores/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , No Fumadores , Líbano , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Etiquetado de Productos/métodosRESUMEN
Hookah, or waterpipe, is a tobacco smoking device that has gained popularity in the United States. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that waterpipe smoke (WPS) is associated with various adverse effects on human health, including infectious diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly thrombotic events. However, the molecular mechanisms through which WPS contributes to disease development remain unclear. In this study, we utilized an analytical approach based on the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) to integrate chemical, gene, phenotype, and disease data to predict potential molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of WPS, based on its chemical and toxicant profile. Our analysis revealed that CVDs were among the top disease categories with regard to the number of curated interactions with WPS chemicals. We identified 5674 genes common between those modulated by WPS chemicals and traditional tobacco smoking. The CVDs with the most curated interactions with WPS chemicals were hypertension, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction, whereas "particulate matter", "heavy metals", and "nicotine" showed the highest number of curated interactions with CVDs. Our analysis predicted that the potential mechanisms underlying WPS-induced thrombotic diseases involve common phenotypes, such as inflammation, apoptosis, and cell proliferation, which are shared across all thrombotic diseases and the three aforementioned chemicals. In terms of enriched signaling pathways, we identified several, including chemokine and MAPK signaling, with particulate matter exhibiting the most statistically significant association with all 12 significant signaling pathways related to WPS chemicals. Collectively, our predictive comprehensive analysis provides evidence that WPS negatively impacts health and offers insights into the potential mechanisms through which it exerts these effects. This information should guide further research to explore and better understand the WPS and other tobacco product-related health consequences.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Pipas de Agua , Trombosis , Fumar en Pipa de Agua , Humanos , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/efectos adversos , Toxicogenética , Trombosis/inducido químicamente , Trombosis/genética , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , FenotipoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiographic status and levels of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers. METHODS: Waterpipe users, cigarette smokers, and never smokers were included. Demographic details were collected using a questionnaire. Characteristics of implants (dimensions, jaw location, depth of placement, insertion torque, and duration in function) were recorded. Peri-implant modified plaque and gingival indices (mPI and mGI), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded in all groups. Volume of PISF and levels of AGEs were determined using standard techniques. Sample-size estimation was done on data from a pilot investigation, and correlation between clinicoradiographic and immunoinflammatory parameters was assessed using logistic regression models. Probability values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In all, 25, 25, and 24 cigarette smokers, never smokers, and waterpipe users, respectively, were examined. All participants were male and had comparable mean ages. Cigarette smokers and waterpipe users had a smoking history of 20.2 ± 3.5 years and 18.8 ± 0.6 years, respectively. The mPI (P < .01), CBL (P < .01), PD (P < 0.01), and mGI (P < .01) were significantly higher in cigarette smokers and waterpipe users than never smokers. There was no significant difference in clinicoradiographic status and AGE concentrations in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers. A statistically significant correlation was recorded between AGEs and PD in cigarette smokers (P < .01) and waterpipe users (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe usage is not less hazardous to peri-implant tissue health than conventional cigarette smoking. It is imperative to caution patients with dental implants about the detrimental effects of tobacco products on oral health.