Optimization and evaluation of modified release solid dosage forms using artificial neural network.

This study aims to optimize and evaluate drug release kinetics of Modified-Release (MR) solid dosage form of Quetiapine Fumarate MR tablets by using the Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). In training the neural network, the drug contents of Quetiapine Fumarate MR tablet such as Sodium Citrate, Eudragit® L100 55, Eudragit® L30 D55, Lactose Monohydrate, Dicalcium Phosphate (DCP), and Glyceryl Behenate were used as variable input data and Drug Substance Quetiapine Fumarate, Triethyl Citrate, and Magnesium Stearate were used as constant input data for the formulation of the tablet. The in-vitro dissolution profiles of Quetiapine Fumarate MR tablets at ten different time points were used as a target data. Several layers together build the neural network by connecting the input data with the output data via weights, these weights show importance of input nodes. The training process optimises the weights of the drug product excipients to achieve the desired drug release through the simulation process in MATLAB software. The percentage drug release of predicted formulation matched with the manufactured formulation using the similarity factor (f2), which evaluates network efficiency. The ANNs have enormous potential for rapidly optimizing pharmaceutical formulations with desirable performance characteristics.

Clearing the Fog: A Review of Antipsychotics for Parkinson's-Related Hallucinations: A Focus on Pimavanserin, Quetiapine and Clozapine.

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, including hallucinations. The use of antipsychotic medications is a common strategy to manage hallucinations associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). However, careful consideration is necessary when selecting the most appropriate drug due to the potential risks associated with the available treatment options. Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), such as Pimavanserin and Clozapine, have effectively controlled PDP symptoms. On the contrary, the support for utilizing quetiapine is not as substantial as other antipsychotics because research studies specifically investigating its application are still emerging and relatively recent. The broad mechanisms of action of AAPs, involving dopamine and serotonin receptors, provide improved outcomes and fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics. Conversely, other antipsychotics, including risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and lurasidone, have been found to worsen motor symptoms and are generally not recommended for PDP. While AAPs offer favorable benefits, they are associated with specific adverse effects. Extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, hypotension, constipation, and cognitive impairment are commonly observed with AAP use. Clozapine, in particular, carries a risk of agranulocytosis, necessitating close monitoring of blood counts. Pimavanserin, a selective serotonin inverse agonist, avoids receptor-related side effects but has been linked to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation, while quetiapine has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of mortality. This review aims to analyze the benefits, risks, and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic medications to assist clinicians in making informed decisions and enhance patient care.

Post-marketing surveillance of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets in patients with bipolar depression.

AIM: This study aimed to verify the real-world efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets (Bipresso® 50 mg and 150 mg; marketing authorization holder is KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in patients with bipolar depression. METHODS: We performed a post-marketing surveillance with an observation period of 12 weeks. RESULTS: In the safety analysis group (n = 345), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 111 patients (32.17%). The most common ADRs (>1%) were somnolence in 55 patients (15.94%), akathisia in 11 (3.19%), dizziness in 10 (2.90%), weight increase in 6 (1.74%), thirst in 5 (1.45%), and hypersomnia, constipation, and nausea in 4 patients each (1.16%). The only severe ADR was one patient of suicidal ideation, and "longer time since the onset of the first episode" (p = 0.011) and "presence of complications" (p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs. In the efficacy analysis group (n = 265), the average changes from baseline in the total Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score were -7.3 ± 8.8, -12.2 ± 10.7, -16.8 ± 12.7, and -13.2 ± 12.7 points after 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at the last evaluation, respectively. The mean MADRS total score decrease had no significant association with maximum daily dose, diagnosis, and presence or absence of prior or concomitant treatment for bipolar disorder with mood stabilizers/antipsychotics/antidepressants. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets was confirmed in clinical practice, and no new safety concerns or risks were identified.

Mucoadhesive chitosan-poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles for intranasal delivery of quetiapine - Development & characterization in physiologically relevant 3D tissue models.

Quetiapine hemifumarate (QF) delivery to the CNS via conventional formulations is challenging due to poor solubility and lower oral bioavailability (9 %). Similarly, many other second-generation antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, clozapine, and paliperidone, have also shown low oral bioavailability of <50 %. Hence, the present work was intended to formulate QF-loaded biodegradable PLGA-NPs with appropriate surface charge modification through poloxamer-chitosan and investigate its targeting potential on RPMI-2650 cell lines to overcome the limitations of conventional therapies. QF-loaded poloxamer-chitosan-PLGA in-situ gel (QF-PLGA-ISG) was designed using emulsification and solvent evaporation techniques. Developed QF-PLGA-ISG were subjected to evaluation for particle size, PDI, zeta potential, ex-vivo mucoadhesion, entrapment efficiency (%EE), and drug loading, which revealed 162.2 nm, 0.124, +20.5 mV, 52.4 g, 77.5 %, and 9.7 %, respectively. Additionally, QF-PLGA formulation showed >90 % release within 12 h compared to 80 % of QF-suspension, demonstrating that the surfactant with chitosan-poloxamer polymers could sustainably release medicine across the membrane. Ex-vivo hemolysis study proved that developed PLGA nanoparticles did not cause any hemolysis compared to negative control. Further, in-vitro cellular uptake and transepithelial permeation were assessed using the RPMI-2650 nasal epithelial cell line. QF-PLGA-ISG not only improved intracellular uptake but also demonstrated a 1.5-2-fold increase in QF transport across RPMI-2650 epithelial monolayer. Further studies in the EpiNasal™ 3D nasal tissue model confirmed the safety and efficacy of the developed QF-PLGA-ISG formulation with up to a 4-fold increase in transport compared to plain QF after 4 h. Additionally, histological reports demonstrated the safety of optimized formulation. Finally, favorable outcomes of IN QF-PLGA-ISG formulation could provide a novel platform for safe and effective delivery of QF in schizophrenic patients.

Rapid Metabolism Underlying Subtherapeutic Serum Levels of Atypical Antipsychotics Preceding Clozapine Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate antipsychotic treatment intensity is required before diagnosing resistant schizophrenia and initiating clozapine treatment. We aimed to investigate potential rapid drug metabolism underlying low dose-adjusted serum concentration (CD) of non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics preceding clozapine treatment. METHODS: Patients using non-clozapine, atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine) within 1 year before starting clozapine were included in this study from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway, between 2005 and 2023. Patients were assigned into low CD (LCD) and normal CD (NCD) subgroups. Using a reference sample with 147,964 antipsychotic measurements, LCD was defined as CDs below the 25th percentile, while patients with NCD exhibited CDs between the 25th and 75th percentile of the respective reference measurements. Metabolic ratios, doses, and frequency of subtherapeutic levels of non-clozapine antipsychotics were compared between LCD and NCD groups. RESULTS: Preceding clozapine treatment, 110 out of 272 included patients (40.4%) were identified with LCD. Compared with the NCD group, LCD patients exhibited higher metabolic ratios of olanzapine (1.5-fold; p < 0.001), quetiapine (3.0-fold; p < 0.001), and risperidone (6.0-fold; p < 0.001). Metabolic ratio differences were independent of smoking and CYP2D6 genotype for olanzapine (p = 0.008) and risperidone (p = 0.016), respectively. Despite higher doses of olanzapine (1.25-fold; p = 0.054) and quetiapine (1.6-fold; p = 0.001) in LCD versus NCD patients, faster metabolism among the former was accompanied by higher frequencies of subtherapeutic levels of olanzapine (3.3-fold; p = 0.044) and quetiapine (1.8-fold; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LCD and associated rapid metabolism of non-clozapine antipsychotics is frequent before starting clozapine treatment. For olanzapine and quetiapine, this is associated with significantly increased risk of having subtherapeutic concentrations.

Dose-dependent effect of lamotrigine on quetiapine serum concentration in patients using instant release tablets.

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine was previously reported to reduce serum concentration of quetiapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lamotrigine dose or quetiapine formulation was of importance for the drug interaction. METHODS: Patients combining lamotrigine with quetiapine (cases) were included retrospectively from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, as were a control group of patients using quetiapine without any interacting drugs. The case and control groups were divided into groups using immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) quetiapine. The case group was further split into high-dose (> 200 mg/day) and low-dose (≤ 200 mg/day) lamotrigine users. Quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (MPR) were compared between the control group and dose-separated case groups using ANOVA test and t-tests. RESULTS: In total, 406 patients were included. The mean C/D ratio of IR quetiapine was 46% lower in the high-dose lamotrigine group compared with the control group (P < 0.001), while no interaction effect was present in the low dose lamotrigine group (P = 0.7). Regardless of lamotrigine dose, there was no difference in quetiapine C/D ratio for patients using the XR formulation (P = 0.4). The quetiapine MPR was unaffected regardless of formulation and lamotrigine dose (P ≥ 0.06). CONCLUSION: The effect of lamotrigine in reducing quetiapine concentration is only significant for patients using quetiapine IR tablets who are treated with lamotrigine doses > 200 mg/day. Because of high variability in the interaction effect, TDM of quetiapine should be recommended during co-prescription of high-dose lamotrigine.

A validated method for the determination of quetiapine fumarate tablets in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese subjects.

A rapid, highly specific and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of Quetiapine Fumarate, a therapeutic drug for various psychiatric disorders, in human plasma. The samples were pretreated using a protein precipitation method, followed by chromatographic separation using a column (Kinetex C18, 2.6µm 50*2.1mm) equipped with an ESI source and MRM mode mass spectrometer. In the validation results of the method, the analyte quetiapine showed a peak at approximately 1.0 minute and exhibited good linearity within the concentration from 2.5 to 2000ng/mL. The intra- and inter-batch precision CV% were within the range of -1.3% to 7.7% and precision of intra- and inter-batch were below 15.0%. Furthermore, this method demonstrated low matrix effects and high recovery rates. The quetiapine plasma sample solution remained stable at room temperature for 25 hours and following 4 freeze-thaw cycles. The prepared samples remained stable in the autosampler (The temperature control of the autosampler was 5oC) for 185 hours and after four freeze-thaw cycles at -20oC and -70oC for 40 days. The present work effectively employed this approach to investigate the pharmacokinetics of orally administered quetiapine fumarate tablets in a cohort of healthy Chinese individuals, both in a fasting state and after a meal.

Esketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

BACKGROUND: In treatment-resistant depression, commonly defined as a lack of response to two or more consecutive treatments during the current depressive episode, the percentage of patients with remission is low and the percentage with relapse is high. The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray as compared with extended-release quetiapine augmentation therapy, both in combination with ongoing treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in patients with treatment-resistant depression are unknown. METHODS: In an open-label, single-blind (with raters unaware of group assignments), multicenter, phase 3b, randomized, active-controlled trial, we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive flexible doses (according to the summary of product characteristics) of esketamine nasal spray (esketamine group) or extended-release quetiapine (quetiapine group), both in combination with an SSRI or SNRI. The primary end point was remission, defined as a score of 10 or less on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), at week 8 (scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression). The key secondary end point was no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8. All patients were included in the analysis; patients who discontinued the trial treatment were considered as having had an unfavorable outcome (i.e., they were grouped with patients who did not have remission or who had a relapse). Analyses of the primary and key secondary end points were adjusted for age and number of treatment failures. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients were assigned to the esketamine group and 340 to the quetiapine group. More patients in the esketamine group than in the quetiapine group had remission at week 8 (91 of 336 patients [27.1%] vs. 60 of 340 patients [17.6%]; P = 0.003) and had no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8 (73 of 336 patients [21.7%] vs. 48 of 340 patients [14.1%]). Over 32 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with remission, the percentage of patients with a treatment response, and the change in the MADRS score from baseline favored esketamine nasal spray. The adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of the trial treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to extended-release quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8. (Funded by Janssen EMEA; ESCAPE-TRD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04338321.).

Uso de antipsicóticos atípicos no tratamento da esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil: estudo de coorte, 2008-2017 / Uso de antipsicóticos atípicos en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia en el Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil: estudio de 2008 a 2017 / Use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in the Brazilian National Health System: a cohort study, 2008-2017

Objective: to investigate sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of users of atypical antipsychotics receiving care via the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Assistance (Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica - CEAF), for the treatment of schizophrenia in Brazil, between 2008 and 2017. Methods: this was a retrospective cohort study using records of the authorizations for high complexity procedures retrieved from the Outpatient Information System of the Brazilian National Health System, from all Brazilian states. Results: of the 759,654 users, 50.5% were female, from the Southeast region (60.2%), diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (77.6%); it could be seen a higher prevalence of the use of risperidone (63.3%) among children/adolescents; olanzapine (34.0%) in adults; and quetiapine (47.4%) in older adults; about 40% of children/adolescents were in off-label use of antipsychotics according to age; adherence to CEAF was high (82%), and abandonment within six months was 24%. Conclusion: the findings expand knowledge about the sociodemographic and clinical profile of users and highlight the practice of off-label use.

Objetivo: investigar las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de los usuarios de antipsicóticos atípicos, atendidos por el Componente Especializado de Asistencia Farmacéutica (CEAF) para el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia en Brasil, de 2008 a 2017. Métodos: estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando registros de autorizaciones de trámites de alta complejidad del Sistema de Información Ambulatorio del SUS, de todos los estados brasileños. Resultados: de los 759.654 usuários identificados, el 50,5% era del sexo feminino de la región Sudeste (60,2%), diagnosticadas con esquizofrenia paranoide (77,6%). Hubo una mayor prevalencia de risperidona (63,3%) entre niños y adolescentes; de olanzapina (34,0%) en adultos; y quetiapina (47,4%) en ancianos. Alrededor del 40% de los niños/adolescentes estaba bajo uso no autorizado de antipsicóticos según la edad. La adherencia al CEAF fue alta (82%), y la deserción a los seis meses fue del 24%. Conclusión: los hallazgos amplían el conocimiento sobre el perfil sociodemográfico y clínico de los usuarios y destacan la práctica del uso off-label.

Objetivo: investigar características sociodemográficas e clínicas de usuários de antipsicóticos atípicos assistidos pelo Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica (CEAF), para tratamento da esquizofrenia no Brasil, de 2008 a 2017. Métodos: estudo de coorte retrospectivo utilizando registros das autorizações de procedimentos de alta complexidade do Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do Sistema Único de Saúde, de todos os estados brasileiros. Resultados: dos 759.654 usuários, 50,5% eram do sexo feminino, da região Sudeste (60,2%), diagnosticados com esquizofrenia paranoide (77,6%); observou-se maior prevalência de uso da risperidona (63,3%) entre crianças/adolescentes; de olanzapina (34,0%), em adultos; e quetiapina (47,4%), nos idosos; cerca de 40% das crianças/ adolescentes estavam sob uso off-label de antipsicóticos segundo a idade; a adesão ao CEAF foi alta (82%), e o abandono em seis meses foi de 24%. Conclusão: os achados ampliam o conhecimento sobre perfil sociodemográfico e clínico dos usuários e destacam a prática do uso off-label.

CYP2D6 Genotyping and Antipsychotic-Associated Extrapyramidal Adverse Effects in a Randomized Trial of Aripiprazole Versus Quetiapine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents, Aged 12-17 Years, With First Episode Psychosis.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the association between genetically predicted CYP2D6 phenotypes and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs). METHODS/PROCEDURES: Data from the Tolerability and Efficacy of Antipsychotics trial of adolescents with first-episode psychosis randomized to aripiprazole versus quetiapine extended release were studied. Extrapyramidal symptom assessments included the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale. Patients were CYP2D6 genotyped. Plasma concentrations of antipsychotics and antidepressants were analyzed. FINDINGS/RESULTS: One hundred thirteen youths (age, 12-17 years; males, 30%; antipsychotic naive, 51%) were enrolled. Poor metabolizers had a significantly higher dose-adjusted aripiprazole plasma concentration (±SD) compared with normal metabolizers at week 4 (24.30 ± 6.40 ng/mL per milligram vs 14.85 ± 6.15 ng/mL per milligram; P = 0.019), but not at week 12 (22.15 ± 11.04 ng/mL per milligram vs 14.32 ± 4.52 ng/mL per milligram; P = 0.067). This association was not found in the quetiapine extended release group. No association between CYP2D6 genotype groups and global Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale score or Simpson-Angus Scale score was found in any of the treatment arms. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support routine use of CYP2D6 testing as a predictor of drug-induced parkinsonism or akathisia risk in clinical settings. Further studies with larger samples of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are needed.

Can Quetiapine Prolong the Antidepressant Effect of Ketamine?: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: Ketamine, a noncompetitive, high-affinity antagonist of the N-methyl-d-aspartate-type glutamate receptor, has a rapid effect in patients with treatment-resistant disorder, but many patients who respond to intravenous ketamine relapse within several days. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term outcome of patients' mood 5 years after ketamine treatment. METHODS: Sixteen electroconvulsive therapy referrals received at least 1 intravenous ketamine treatment in addition to their stable antidepressant medications. Depression was evaluated using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Anxiety was measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale. RESULTS: Of 16 patients treated, 6 achieved complete remission, 3 partially responded, and 7 did not respond. At baseline, all patients were treated with antidepressants, 14 patients were also treated with neuroleptics, of whom 5 patients were treated with quetiapine. The time to relapse in the 5 patients taking quetiapine was significantly longer than in patients who were taking other neuroleptics (965.83 ± 824.68 vs 80.5 ± 114.3, Z = 7.001, P = 0.0001). At the 5-year follow-up, 3 of the patients taking quetiapine maintained their remission. Overall levels of depression and anxiety at all times were improved in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our follow-up results suggest that the combination of quetiapine and ketamine can prolong time to relapse after ketamine treatment in patients with treatment-resistant disorder.

Therapeutic potential of TAK-071, a muscarinic M1 receptor positive allosteric modulator with low cooperativity, for the treatment of cognitive deficits and negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

The selective activation of the muscarinic M1 receptor (M1R) may be a promising approach for treating cognitive impairment associated with cholinergic dysfunction. We previously reported that low cooperativity (α-value) is associated with a favorable cholinergic side effect profile of M1R positive allosteric modulators (M1 PAMs), as well as being a crucial factor for the cognitive improvement observed after combining M1 PAMs with donepezil, in rodents. In this study, we preclinically characterized TAK-071, a novel M1 PAM with low cooperativity (α-value = 199), as a new therapy for schizophrenia. We tested TAK-071 in the offspring of polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid-treated dams, which is a maternal immune activation model of schizophrenia. TAK-071 improved sociability deficits and working memory in this model. In a genetic mouse model of schizophrenia, miR-137 transgenic (Tg) mice, TAK-071 improved deficits in working memory, recognition memory, sociability, and sensorimotor gating. Patients with schizophrenia usually take several antipsychotics to treat positive symptoms. Thus, we also investigated the combined effects of TAK-071 with currently prescribed antipsychotics. Among the 10 antipsychotics tested, only olanzapine and quetiapine showed M1R antagonistic effects, which were counteracted by TAK-071 at possible effective concentrations for cognitive improvement in vitro. Moreover, haloperidol did not affect the ability of TAK-071 to improve working memory in miR-137 Tg mice, suggesting a low risk of losing efficacy when combined with dopamine D2 receptor antagonists. In conclusion, TAK-071 can exert beneficial effects on social behavior and cognitive function and could be a new therapy for schizophrenia.

The stability of quetiapine oral suspension compounded from commercially available tablets.

Quetiapine fumarate (QF) is an atypical antipsychotic used off-label for the treatment of delirium in critically-ill infants and children. For the treatment of pediatric populations or patient populations with trouble swallowing tablets, an oral suspension would be an ideal dosage formulation. However, there are no liquid formulations of QF commercially available. Therefore, a compounded oral suspension prepared from the commercial QF tablets is widely used in clinical settings. The extemporaneous preparation of QF compounded oral suspension changes the formulation from a solid form to a liquid form. Thus, the stability of QF compounded oral suspension should be critically evaluated to guide pharmacists for administration and storage of QF compounded oral suspensions. However, the stability of the nonaqueous oral QF suspension was not measured. The objective of this study was to develop QF compounded oral suspensions at 10 mg/mL by using commercial QF tablets in two readily available aqueous vehicles (Ora-Sweet and Ora-Blend) and measure their stability at both room temperature and under refrigeration. Physical stability of the QF compounded suspensions were evaluated by appearance and odor. Chemical stability of the QF compounded suspensions were evaluated based on pH, degradation, drug content and the amount of the drug dissolved in the vehicles. An HPLC method was validated and used to evaluate QF compounded suspensions over 60 days. In addition to the total drug in the suspensions, the dissolved drug in the vehicles was also measured during the stability testing and evaluated as a stability parameter. Overall, QF suspension prepared in Ora-Blend was preferable, demonstrating a superior 60-day stability at both room temperature and refrigerated storage.

Severe Adverse Drug Reactions to Quetiapine in Two Patients Carrying CYP2D6*4 Variants: A Case Report.

We report two cases of patients who developed severe adverse drug reactions including persistent movement disorders, nausea, and vertigo during treatment with quetiapine at maximum daily doses ranging between 300 and 400 mg. The extensive hepatic metabolism of quetiapine is mainly attributed to cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). However, there is recent evidence supporting the idea of CYP2D6 playing a role in the clearance of the quetiapine active metabolite norquetiapine. Interestingly, both patients we are reporting of are carriers of the CYP2D6*4 variant, predicting an intermediate metabolizer phenotype. Additionally, co-medication with a known CYP2D6 inhibitor and renal impairment might have further affected quetiapine pharmacokinetics. The herein reported cases could spark a discussion on the potential impact of a patient's pharmacogenetic predisposition in the treatment with quetiapine. However, further studies are warranted to promote the adoption of pharmacogenetic testing for the prevention of drug-induced toxicities associated with quetiapine.

Successful diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis-related malignant catatonia using propofol and quetiapine: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant catatonia (MC) is a movement disorder syndrome characterized by immobility, rigidity, and consciousness disorders that develops in association with mental and physical diseases. It is often fatal due to hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury. Its clinical symptoms are similar to those of another disorder, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), and it is often difficult to distinguish between the 2 disorders. PATIENT CONCERNS: An Asian woman in her 60s with history of schizophrenia. She was admitted to our hospital because of symptoms such as fever, unconsciousness, and muscle rigidity. Blood tests showed kidney injury and high creatinine kinase levels. DIAGNOSES: At the time of admission, she had been diagnosed with NMS complicated by pulmonary aspergillosis and was undergoing treatment although there was no improvement. INTERVENTIONS: Subsequently, the administration of propofol, a gamma-aminobutyric acid A agonist, markedly improved the symptoms, and the diagnosis was corrected to MC. At the beginning of her hospitalization, she received dantrolene, bromocriptine, amantadine, and L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine as treatment for NMS, but her symptoms did not improve. With propofol, which is used for sedation, her catatonic symptoms improved markedly. Quetiapine administration further improved the symptoms, and it eventually resolved completely. OUTCOMES: The patient's MC was in remission. Prolonged intensive care management resulted in a decline in activities of daily living, and she required rehabilitation at another hospital. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of MC with suspected involvement of pulmonary aspergillosis. MC differs from NMS, in that it is treated more effectively with gamma-aminobutyric acid A agonists. Although benzodiazepines are the first choice for the diagnosis and treatment of MC, they are ineffective for majority of patients with schizophrenia. However, even in such cases, propofol and quetiapine are effective, and they facilitate diagnosis and treatment.

Dose-response association of acute-phase quetiapine treatment with risk of new-onset hypothyroidism in schizophrenia patients.

AIMS: To assess association between quetiapine treatment and risk of new-onset hypothyroidism in schizophrenia patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2016 and December 2018. Schizophrenia patients with normal thyroid tests at admission were included. Hypothyroidism, which was defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone >4.20 mU/L and free thyroxine <12.00 pmol/L, or on L-thyroxine prescriptions, was the outcome measure, and quetiapine treatment between admission and subsequent thyroid test was the exposure measure of this study. Adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the independent association of quetiapine treatment with risk of new-onset hypothyroidism. The dose-response association was further analysed by 3 quetiapine doses: low (≤<=0.2 g/d), medium (0.2-0.6 g/d), and high (>0.6 g/d). RESULTS: A total of 2022 eligible patients were included in the final analysis. Sixty patients (15.0%) in the quetiapine group developed hypothyroidism, while 56 patients (3.5%) in the nonquetiapine group developed hypothyroidism. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) of developing hypothyroidism for quetiapine use was 4.01 (2.86-5.64) after adjusting for several potential confounding factors. A strong dose-response association between quetiapine use and risk of developing hypothyroidism was observed: adjusted relative risks (95% confidence intervals) were 1.00 (0.25-2.59), 4.22 (2.80-6.25) and 5.62 (3.66-8.38), respectively, for low-, medium- and high-dose quetiapine, as compared with no quetiapine. CONCLUSION: Acute phase quetiapine treatment for schizophrenia patients was strongly associated with increased risk of developing new-onset hypothyroidism, with a clear dose-response association.

Association of Low-Dose Quetiapine and Diabetes.

Importance: Quetiapine has been associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes when used in medium or high doses for the treatment of severe mental disorders. It is not known whether low doses, commonly used off-label for sedative-hypnotic purposes, are also associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Objective: To investigate whether there is an association between prescription of low-dose quetiapine and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined nationwide Danish health registers for data regarding new users of quetiapine (n = 185 938) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (n = 1 031 920) who were aged 18 years or older between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2018. Individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were excluded. Quetiapine-initiators were matched 1:1 with initiators of SSRIs, using a high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS). Maximum follow-up was 5 years. Association with cumulative dose was investigated, using a case-control approach nested among quetiapine users. Data analysis was performed from May to September 2020. Exposures: Dispensing of quetiapine or SSRIs. Quetiapine prescriptions were limited to tablet strengths of 25 mg and 50 mg to focus on low-dose use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident type 2 diabetes was defined as first filling of an antidiabetic medication, first register diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or first hemoglobin A1C measurement greater than or equal to 6.4% (≥48 mmol/mol). Incidence rates (IRs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) were calculated for full and matched cohorts using as-treated and intention-to-treat approaches. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the association with cumulative quetiapine dose. Results: Altogether, 896 285 patients were included in the full cohort; 538 164 (60%) were female and the median (interquartile range) age was 47 (33-67) years. There were 57 701 low-dose quetiapine initiators and 838 584 SSRI initiators. The matched cohort consisted of 54 616 pairs. In as-treated analyses, the incidence of type 2 diabetes during treatment with low-dose quetiapine (425 cases) was 9.59 cases/1000 person-years (PY) (95% CI, 8.72-10.5/1000 PY), which was slightly higher than for SSRI users (8462 cases; IR, 8.13/1000 PY; 95% CI, 7.96-8.30/1000 PY), resulting in a significant IRR of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.30) and NNH of 684 (95% CI, 418-1873). However, the between-group difference was nonsignificant in the hdPS-matched cohort (IR, 9.49 vs IR, 9.58; IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.13). The case-control analysis found no dose-response association of low-dose quetiapine with diabetes (OR for doubling of the cumulative dose: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; P = .54), but in sensitivity analyses higher daily doses were associated with diabetes (all tablet strengths: OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, use of low-dose quetiapine was not associated with excess risk of type 2 diabetes in comparison with SSRIs.

The effect of amisulpride, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole single administration on c-Fos expression in vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic neurons of the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus.

Antipsychotics, including amisulpride (AMI), quetiapine (QUE), aripiprazole (ARI), and olanzapine (OLA), are used to treat mental illnesses associated with psychotic symptoms. The effect of these drugs on c-Fos expression in vasopressinergic (AVP) and oxytocinergic (OXY) neurons was studied in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of rats. The presence of c-Fos in AVP and OXY perikarya was investigated in seven PVN cells segregations: the anterior (Ant), dorsal cup (Dc), wing-shaped (Wi), periventricular zone (Pe), circle-shaped core (Co) and shell of core (Sh), and the posterior (pPVN) after an acute treatment with AMI-20 mg/kg, QUE-15 mg/kg, ARI-10 mg/kg, and OLA-5 mg/kg/bw in rats. Ninety min after treatments, the animals were sacrificed by transcardial perfusion with fixative and the PVN area sliced into 35 µm thick coronal sections for immunohistochemistry. The c-Fos was processed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex intensified with nickel-enhanced 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Visualization of AVP- and OXY-synthesizing neurons was achieved by a fluorescent marker Alexa Flour 568. The c-Fos-AVP and c-Fos-OXY colocalizations were evaluated from c-Fos stained sections merged with AVP or OXY ones. AMI, QUE, ARI, and OLA, single administration distinctly increased the c-Fos expression in each of the PVN cells segregations. QUE induced the highest magnitude of activation of AVP and OXY neurons, while OLA and AMI had only moderate effects. Incontestable variabilities detected in c-Fos expression in PVN AVP and OXY neurons extend the knowledge of selected antipsychotics extra-striatal actions and may also be helpful in a presumption of their possible functional impact.