Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 638
Filtrar
2.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 34(6): 525-529, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935464

RESUMEN

Aim: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of snare-assisted traction endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) on gastric fundus submucosal tumors (SMTs). Methods: The clinical and pathological data of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent EFTR treatment at the Endoscopy Center of Kaifeng Central Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023 were collected. Among them, 36 patients underwent snare-assisted traction EFTR (SAT-EFTR) and 46 patients underwent standard EFTR (S-EFTR). The clinical baseline data, operative data, adverse events, and follow-up results of the two groups were collected and compared. Results: All patients successfully completed EFTR technique. There were 34 male and 48 female patients, with an average age of (56.62 ± 11.31) years. The average operation time was shorter in the snare-assisted EFTR group than the S-EFTR group (73.39 ± 31.33 minutes versus 92.89 ± 37.57 minutes, P = .014). In addition, the resection speed of the snare-assisted EFTR group was also significantly faster than that of the S-EFTR group (4.04 ± 2.23 versus 2.48 ± 0.93 mm2/min, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, lesion size, postoperative fasting duration, and postoperative hospitalization stay between the two groups (P > .05). One patient in the SAT-EFTR group developed delayed postoperative perforation which was close with purse­string suture technique. All patients were discharged successfully, and there was no recurrence or metastasis during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Snare-assisted traction of EFTR could shorten the operation time, reduce the difficulty of the operation, and improve the efficiency of the operation. At the same time, this method is simple and easy to learn, more suitable for beginners, and worthy of clinical promotion and application.


Asunto(s)
Fundus Gástrico , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/instrumentación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Gastroscopía/métodos , Mucosa Gástrica/cirugía , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Adulto , Tracción/métodos
9.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ; 32(3): 112-118, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36911894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a standard treatment method for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs). Evidence of the safety and efficacy of a double-curved endoscope (DCE) in EFTR of gGISTs is limited. We aimed to compare the operative outcomes of DCE versus single-curved endoscopes (SCE) in EFTR of gGISTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at four Chinese tertiary institutes. From January 2019 to November 2021, 104 patients who underwent EFTR by SCE (n = 57) or DCE (n = 47) were enrolled. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups to compare the demographics and operative outcomes. RESULTS: All gGISTs were resected successfully with no recurrence during follow-up. The median (range) tumor size was 1.2 (0.5, 3.5) cm in DCE and 2.0 (0.6, 4.8) cm in SCE (p < .001), and the procedure time was shorter in the DCE group than in the SCE group (50.0 min vs. 62.0 min, p < .05). After PSM, 41 pairs were selected, and no difference was noted in demographics. The procedure time was also shorter in the DCE group than in the SCE group (50.0 min vs. 55.0 min, p < .05). Subgroup analysis showed that the DCE group had a shorter procedure time in the gastric fundus than the SCE group (47.0 min vs. 55.0 min, p < .05). In multiple linear regression analysis, significant factors related to prolonged procedure time were the type of endoscope of SCE and larger tumor size (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: EFTR of gGISTs using DCE is safe and effective. Compared with SCE, DCE had an advantage in terms of operative time, especially in the gastric fundus.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Endoscopios , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Hormones (Athens) ; 22(2): 151-163, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36705877

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ghrelin, one of the most studied gut hormones, is mainly produced by the gastric fundus. Abundant evidence exists from preclinical and clinical studies underlining its contribution to glucose regulation. In the following narrative review, the role of the gastric fundus in glucose regulation is summarized and we investigate whether its resection enhances glycemic control. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed® database and in Google Scholar® using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH). We examined types of metabolic surgery, including, in particular, gastric fundus resection, either as part of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or modified laparoscopic gastric bypass with fundus resection (LRYGBP + FR), and the contribution of ghrelin reduction to glucose regulation. RESULTS: Fourteen human studies were judged to be eligible and included in this narrative review. Reduction of ghrelin levels after fundus resection might be related to early glycemic improvement before significant weight loss is achieved. Long-term data regarding the role of ghrelin reduction in glucose homeostasis are sparse. CONCLUSION: The exact role of ghrelin in achieving glycemic control is still ambiguous. Data from human studies reveal a potential contribution of ghrelin reduction to early glycemic improvement, although further well-designed studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Ghrelina/metabolismo , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/metabolismo , Control Glucémico , Glucosa/metabolismo , Gastrectomía
12.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(7): 744-750, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36604805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type is a new subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) as a new and rare gastric tumour with a low incidence due to the small number of cumulative cases worldwide. Twenty cases of GA-FG found in our centre were retrospectively analysed to improve the diagnostic ability of endoscopy and pathology in this disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinicopathological features of fundus-derived gastric tumours and to improve the understanding of and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy for this disease. METHODS: The clinicopathological characteristics of 20 GA-FG cases between 2018 and 2022 were analysed using clinical and follow-up data and endoscopic, immunohistochemical, and pathological morphology characteristics. RESULTS: In all cases, GA-FG was found in the fundus and the body of the stomach. In total, there were 19 patients with 20 lesions, with most of the patients having a single lesion. One patient had multiple lesions, and another patient had complications from signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). All lesions occurred in non-atrophic areas, and 10 patients had gastric fundic gland polyps simultaneously. There were 14 cases of gastric fundus adenocarcinoma and 6 cases of acid-secreting adenoma. Fourteen lesions were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), without recurrence or metastasis during the follow up; 6 patients were followed up for observation, 2 of whom showed no lesions after the first biopsy by gastric endoscopy, and 4 of whom showed no significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate for GA-FG lesions may be underestimated due to their benign course. ESD seems to be an adequate treatment for GA-FG. MAIN POINTS: Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) is located in the fundus and body of the stomach. All lesions occur in non-atrophic areas, and almost one-half involve gastric fundus polyps simultaneously. GA-FG lesions typically follow a benign disease course. ESD seems to be an adequate treatment for GA-FG.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología
13.
Mil Med ; 188(9-10): e3265-e3268, 2023 08 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355858

RESUMEN

Dieulafoy's lesions (DLs) are a rare and difficult-to-identify cause of acute gastrointestinal bleeding that can lead to hemorrhagic shock. We present a case of a 23-year-old previously healthy male presenting with melenic stools and hemorrhagic shock. Computed tomography of abdomen and pelvis with oral and intravenous contrast showed a possible source of hemorrhage as a hyperdense intraluminal material within the stomach. Initial urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a large, nonbleeding distal esophageal DL, which was treated successfully with 10 mL of 1:10,000 epinephrine and bipolar cauterization with 10 Fr Gold Probe™. Hemorrhage recurred 2 d later, prompting another esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which found another DL within the gastric fundus. Treatment with epinephrine, Gold Probe™, and through-the-scope Hemoclips was unsuccessful because of difficult visualization and positioning. A subsequent attempt was made using the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) Padlock™ Clip Defect Closure System with successful hemostasis and stabilization of the patient. His hospital course was complicated by left lower lobe segmental pulmonary embolism without right heart strain for which he was discharged on 3 months of anticoagulation with apixaban. On follow-up, there was no recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) despite 3 months of anticoagulation. He did not complete the Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) Training. This case report demonstrates the evaluation and management of a patient with hemorrhagic shock from two DLs and sustained hemostasis with the Padlock™ OTSC in the setting of apixaban anticoagulation.


Asunto(s)
Hemostasis Endoscópica , Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Hemostasis Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Hemostasis Endoscópica/métodos , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Epinefrina , Coagulación Sanguínea , Anticoagulantes
15.
Surg Endosc ; 37(3): 1806-1812, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, no prospective study has compared the safety and efficacy of band-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (BA-EMR) with those of endoscopic dissection (ESD) for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the gastric fundus. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of BA-EMR with those of ESD for SMTs ≤ 1.5 cm in the gastric fundus. METHODS: In total, 62 patients with SMTs ≤ 1.5 cm in the gastric fundus underwent band ligation; the lesions that could be completely ligated were excised using a snare, while others were removed by ESD. RESULTS: Of 62 patients, 42 had their lesions completely ligated by the band and underwent BA-EMR, while 20 had lesions that could not be completely ligated and underwent ESD. The average tumor size was 0.94 ± 0.16 and 1.30 ± 0.16 cm in the BA-EMR and ESD groups, respectively. Compared with ESD, BA-EMR had significantly fewer complications and a significantly shorter mean operating time and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: BA-EMR is a safe and effective method for small SMTs in the gastric fundus, but is only suitable for SMTs < 1.2 cm. For small SMTs (< 1.2 cm) in the gastric fundus, BA-EMR may simplify the treatment procedure, shorten the operation time, and reduce complications.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Gastroscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Mucosa Gástrica/cirugía , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 115(5): 275-276, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205322

RESUMEN

As a common foreign body in children, magnet ingestion has been a widespread health issue. Unlike single magnet, ingestion of multiple magnets, especially those high-powered like Buckyballs could cause significant GI injury, e.g., perforation and fistula. Hereby we present a "push-and-pull" trick for management of a rare circumstance of Buckyballs ingestion.


Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Fulerenos , Niño , Humanos , Fundus Gástrico/diagnóstico por imagen , Fundus Gástrico/cirugía , Esófago , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Ingestión de Alimentos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...