Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 680
Filtrar
1.
Obes Surg ; 34(7): 2411-2419, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858296

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was once the most popular bariatric procedure in the 1980's, with many patients subsequently requiring conversional surgery. However, knowledge regarding the prevalence and outcomes of these procedures remains limited. This study aims to determine the prevalence, indications, rate of 30-day serious complications, and mortality of conversional surgery after VBG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database from 2020 to 2022 was conducted. Individuals undergoing conversional or revisional surgery after VBG were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day serious complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of 716 VBG conversions, the common procedures included 660 (92.1%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 56 (7.9%) sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The main indication for conversion was weight gain for RYGB (31.0%) and for SG (41.0%). RYGB had longer operative times than SG (223.7 vs 130.5 min, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, serious complications were higher after RYGB (14.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.2). Leak rates were higher after SG (5.4 vs 3.5%) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Mortality was similar between RYGB and SG (1.2 vs 1.8%, p = 0.7). Multivariable regression showed higher body mass index, longer operative time, previous cardiac surgery and black race were independently associated with serious complications. Conversion to RYGB was not predictive of serious complications compared to SG (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.34-2.67, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Conversional surgery after VBG is uncommon, and the rate of complications and mortality remains high. Patients should be thoroughly evaluated and informed about these risks before undergoing conversion from VBG.


Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia , Obesidad Mórbida , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Humanos , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
World J Surg ; 48(6): 1481-1491, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610103

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: New Zealand has a population of only 5.5 million meaning that for many surgical procedures the country qualifies as a "low-volume center." However, the health system is well developed and required to provide complex surgical procedures that benchmark internationally against comparable countries. This investigation was undertaken to review regional variation and volumes of complex resection and palliative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgical procedures within New Zealand. METHODS: Data pertaining to patients undergoing complex resectional UGI procedures (esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, and hepatectomies) and palliative UGI procedures (esophageal stenting, enteroenterostomy, biliary enteric anastomosis, and liver ablation) in a New Zealand hospital between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 were obtained from the National Minimum Dataset. RESULTS: New Zealand is a low-volume center for UGI surgery (229 hepatectomies, 250 gastrectomies, 126 pancreatectomies, and 74 esophagectomies annually). Over 80% of patients undergoing hepatic resection/ablation, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and pancreatectomy are treated in one of the six national cancer centers (Auckland, Waikato, Mid-Central, Capital Coast, Canterbury, or Southern). There is evidence of the decreasing frequency of these procedures in small centers with increasing frequency in large centers suggesting that some regionalization is occurring. Palliative procedures were more widely performed. Indigenous Maori were less likely to be treated in a nationally designated cancer center than non-Maori. CONCLUSIONS: The challenge for New Zealand and similarly sized countries is to develop and implement a system that optimizes the skills and pathways that come from a frequent performance of complex surgery while maintaining system resilience and ensuring equitable access for all patients.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Nueva Zelanda , Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 20(7): 679-686, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of morbid obesity and obesity-related conditions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become increasingly popular in Denmark and worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term outcomes including postoperative complications after LSG. SETTING: University Hospitals, Denmark. METHODS: This was a nationwide multicenter cohort study including all patients who underwent LSG during 2010 to 2016 in Denmark. Data were collected from the Danish Obesity Surgery Registry and medical records. Representatives from all public bariatric centers in Denmark registered information on demography, indication, preoperative tests, operative information, weight loss, status of co-morbidities, and early and late complications. RESULTS: In total, 541 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 6 years, and 536 patients (99%) were available at the end of follow-up. The patients achieved a persistent weight loss. Quality of life significantly improved after both 12 and 24 months. Overall, 3% of the patients had a major complication ≤30 days after the procedure and 3% underwent reoperation. One in 5 patients (22%) had an early minor complication. In the long term, 3% of the patients had a major complication and 24% of the patients had ≥1 minor complication. The most common surgery-related healthcare contacts addressed gastroesophageal reflux, weight recurrence, and stenosis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients after LSG achieved sufficient weight loss and improved quality of life. The procedure was safe with low risk of early and late major complications. However, there was a high frequency of early and late minor complications in 22% and 24% of the patients, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pérdida de Peso , Humanos , Dinamarca , Femenino , Masculino , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros
5.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(7): 1277-1284, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Changes in the number of surgeries for gastric cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been reported, but data are insufficient to understand the impact at the national level. This study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastric surgery in Japan. METHODS: Insurance claims data registered from January 2015 to January 2021 were used. Changes in the number of endoscopic resections and gastrectomies for gastric cancer were estimated using an interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: The number of endoscopic resections significantly decreased in July 2020 (-1565; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2022, -1108) and January 2021 (-539; 95% CI: -970, -109), and the number of laparoscopic surgeries significantly decreased in July 2020 (-795; 95% CI: -1097, -492), October 2020 (-313; 95% CI: -606, -19), and January 2021 (-507; 95% CI: -935, -78). Meanwhile, the number of open gastrectomies remained unchanged, and the number of robot-assisted gastrectomies steadily increased since their coverage by public health insurance in April 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased number of endoscopic resections and laparoscopic surgeries in Japan suggests a decline in early-stage gastric cancer diagnosis, likely due to the suspension of gastric cancer screening and diagnostic testing during the pandemic. Meanwhile, the number of open and robot-assisted gastrectomies remained unchanged and increased, respectively, indicating that these applications were not affected by the pandemic-related medical crisis. These findings highlight that procedures for cancer diagnosis, including screening, should still be provided during pandemics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gastrectomía , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/tendencias , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Pandemias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/tendencias
6.
Surgery ; 175(6): 1518-1523, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric surgery is a crucial component of general surgery training. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data on operative volume and the diversity of surgical procedures that general surgery residents are exposed to. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from the American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited program from 2009 to 2022. Data on the mean number of gastric procedures, including the mean in each subcategory, were retrieved. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in operative volume. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2022, the mean overall logged gastric procedures rose significantly (τ = 0.722, P < .001) from 36.2 in 2009 to 49.2 in 2022 (35.9% increase). The most substantial growth was seen in laparoscopic gastric reduction for morbid obesity (mean 1.9 in 2017 to 19 in 2022; τ = 0.670, P = .009). A statistically significant increase was also seen in laparoscopic partial gastric resections, repair of gastric perforation, and "other major stomach procedures" (P < .05 for all comparisons). Open gastrostomy, open partial gastric resections, and open vagotomy all significantly decreased (P < .05 for all comparisons). There was no significant change in the volume of laparoscopic gastrectomy, total gastric resections, and non-laparoscopic gastric reductions for morbid obesity (P > .05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: There has been a substantial increase in the volume of gastric surgery during residency over the past 14 years, driven mainly by an increase in laparoscopic gastric reduction. However, there may still be a need for further gastric surgical training to ensure well-rounded general surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Cirugía General/educación , Cirugía General/tendencias , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/educación , Gastrectomía/tendencias , Gastrectomía/educación , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino
7.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 55(2): 829-837, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a global health concern with varying clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate the influence of preoperative Body Mass Index (BMI) on survival in patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer in Eastern India. METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained Surgical Oncology database were analysed for patients who underwent curative resection for primary gastric adenocarcinoma between May 2016 and March 2022. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. Preoperative BMI was categorised into three groups: Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), Normal (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), and Overweight/Obese (=23 kg/m2). Clinicopathological details, short-term outcomes, and long-term oncological outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis included survival estimates, Cox proportional hazard models, and subgroup analysis. RESULT: Of 162 patients, 145 met the inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly male (68%) with middle or lower socioeconomic status. No significant differences amongst BMI groups were observed in performance score, tumour grade, clinical stage, or short-term outcomes. Postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were similar. However, underweight patients had poorer 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared to overweight/obese patients (14.3% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.03). Overweight/obese patients showed significantly better 4-year overall survival (OS) than underweight patients (47.8% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In Eastern Indian gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resection, preoperative higher BMI (overweight/obese) was associated with better long-term survival. Understanding these findings could guide tailored interventions to improve outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , India/epidemiología , Anciano , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto , Periodo Preoperatorio , Delgadez/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Pronóstico
8.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 20(6): 545-552, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Fellowship Certificate was created to ensure satisfactory training and requires a minimum number of anastomotic cases. With laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy becoming the most common bariatric procedure in the United States, this may present a challenge for fellows to obtain adequate numbers for ASMBS certification. OBJECTIVES: To investigate bariatric fellowship trends from 2012 to 2019, the types, numbers, and approaches of surgical procedures performed by fellows were examined. SETTING: Academic training centers in the United States. METHODS: Data were obtained from Fellowship Council records of all cases performed by fellows in ASMBS-accredited bariatric surgery training programs between 2012 and 2019. A retrospective analysis using standard descriptive statistical methods was performed to investigate trends in total case volume and cases per fellow for common bariatric procedures. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, sleeve gastrectomy cases performed by all Fellowship Council fellows nearly doubled from 6,514 to 12,398, compared with a slight increase for gastric bypass, from 8,486 to 9,204. Looking specifically at bariatric fellowships, the mean number of gastric bypass cases per fellow dropped over time, from 91.1 cases (SD = 46.8) in 2012-2013 to 52.6 (SD = 62.1) in 2018-2019. Mean sleeve gastrectomy cases per fellow increased from 54.7 (SD = 31.5) in 2012-2013 to a peak of 98.6 (SD = 64.3) in 2015-2016. Robotic gastric bypasses also increased from 4% of all cases performed in 2012-2013 to 13.3% in 2018-2019. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric fellowship training has seen a decrease in gastric bypasses, an increase in sleeve gastrectomies, and an increase in robotic surgery completed by each fellow from 2012 to 2019.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Becas , Humanos , Cirugía Bariátrica/educación , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Bariátrica/tendencias , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Laparoscopía/educación , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Femenino , Gastrectomía/educación , Gastrectomía/tendencias , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía
10.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 20(5): 462-466, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155076

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common Bariatric procedure in the United States; however, the frequency of conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to determine the conversion rate over time from LSG to RYGB. The secondary objectives were to evaluate factors associated with conversion and postconversion weight loss outcomes. SETTING: Single Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all LSG from 2011 to 2020 was done. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the conversion rate over time after LSG. Cox regression was utilized to identify predictors of future conversion. RESULTS: Of 875 LSGs, 46 were converted to RYGB from 2011 to 2020. Median follow-up was 2.6 years, and 7-year follow-up rate was 59.9%. The 1-year conversion rate was 1.4%, increasing to 3.8%, 9.0%, and 12.6% at 3, 5, and 7 years respectively. Female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.2, P = .05) and age <55 (HR = 3.5, P = .04) were associated with greater chance of conversion. Preoperative asthma (HR = 1.7, P = .14) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (HR = 1.5, P = .18) trended toward higher conversion but were not significant. Of those with body mass index (BMI) >35 at time of conversion, the mean total body weight loss (TBWL) was 13.0% at the time of conversion. This subgroup had additional 13.6% of TBWL 1-year after conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of LSG to RYGB increased with time to 12.6% conversion rate at 7-years. Patients with GERD prior to LSG had a nonsignificant trend toward conversion, while younger patients and females had significantly higher rates of conversion. There may be additional weight loss benefit for patients converted to RYGB.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Pérdida de Peso , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 49(1): 83-88, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer surgery conducted late during the working week might decrease long-term survival for some tumours. Studies on how weekday of gastrectomy influences long-term survival following gastric cancer are few and show conflicting results, which prompted the present investigation. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included almost all patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Sweden between 2006 and 2015, with follow-up throughout 2020. Associations between weekday of gastrectomy and 5-year all-cause mortality (main outcome) and 5-year disease-specific mortality (secondary outcome) were analysed using multivariable Cox regression. The hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were adjusted for age, sex, education, comorbidity, pathological tumour stage, tumour sub-location, neoadjuvant therapy, annual surgeon volume of gastrectomy, and calendar year. RESULTS: Among 1678 patients, surgery on Thursday-Friday was not associated with any statistically significantly increased risk of 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.22) or 5-year disease-specific mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.23) compared to Monday-Wednesday. No associations were found when each weekday was analysed separately, with point estimates close to 1.00 (range 0.98-1.00) Monday-Thursday, but increased for Friday (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89-1.68) when fewer patients underwent surgery (4% of all). Stratified analyses by age, comorbidity, tumour stage, neoadjuvant therapy, surgeon volume, and tumour sub-location did not reveal any associations between weekday of surgery on Thursday-Friday compared with Monday-Wednesday and risk of 5-year all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Weekday of gastrectomy might not influence the 5-year survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Masculino , Femenino , Suecia/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios de Seguimiento
12.
ABCD (São Paulo, Online) ; 36: e1745, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1447011

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There are no information in the literature associating the volume of gastrectomies with survival and costs for the health system in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer in Colombia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze how gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with hospital volume, 30-day and 180-day postoperative mortality, and healthcare costs in Bogotá, Colombia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on hospital data of all adult patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2014 and 2016 using a paired propensity score. The surgical volume was identified as the average annual number of gastrectomies performed by the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 743 patients were included in the study. Hospital mortality at 30 and 180 days postoperatively was 36 (4.85%) and 127 (17.09%) patients, respectively. The average health care cost was USD 3,200. A total of 26 or more surgeries were determined to be the high surgical volume cutoff. Patients operated on in hospitals with a high surgical volume had lower 6-month mortality (HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.27-0.71; p=0.001), and no differences were found in health costs (mean difference 398.38; 95%CI-418.93-1,215.69; p=0.339). CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that in Bogotá (Colombia), surgery in a high-volume hospital is associated with better 6-month survival and no additional costs to the health system.


RESUMO RACIONAL: Não há informações na literatura relacionando o volume de gastrectomias bem como a sobrevida e os custos para o sistema de saúde, no tratamento de pacientes com câncer gástrico na Colômbia. OBJETIVOS: analisar como a gastrectomia para câncer gástrico está associada ao volume hospitalar, mortalidade pós-operatória de 30 e 180 dias e custos de saúde em Bogotá, Colômbia. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo baseado em dados hospitalares de todos os pacientes adultos com câncer gástrico submetidos à gastrectomia entre 2014 e 2016, utilizando um escore de propensão pareado. O volume cirúrgico foi identificado como o número médio anual de gastrectomias realizadas pelo hospital. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 743 pacientes. A mortalidade hospitalar aos 30 e 180 dias de pós-operatório, foram respectivamente, 36 (4,85%) e 127 (17,09%) pacientes. O custo médio de saúde foi de US$ 3.200. Vinte e seis ou mais cirurgias foram determinadas como ponto de corte de alto volume cirúrgico. Pacientes operados em hospitais de alto volume cirúrgico tiveram menor mortalidade em seis meses (HR 0,44; IC95% 0,27-0,71; p=0,001) e não foram encontradas diferenças nos custos com saúde (diferença média 398,38; IC95% −418,93-1215,69; p=0,339). CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo concluiu que em Bogotá (Colômbia), a cirurgia em um hospital com alto volume cirúrgico está associada a uma melhor sobrevida de seis meses e não há custos adicionais para o sistema de saúde.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Gastrectomía/economía , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Colombia/epidemiología , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
JAMA ; 327(24): 2423-2433, 2022 06 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35657620

RESUMEN

Importance: Obesity increases the incidence and mortality from some types of cancer, but it remains uncertain whether intentional weight loss can decrease this risk. Objective: To investigate whether bariatric surgery is associated with lower cancer risk and mortality in patients with obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the SPLENDID (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) matched cohort study, adult patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater who underwent bariatric surgery at a US health system between 2004 and 2017 were included. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched 1:5 to patients who did not undergo surgery for their obesity, resulting in a total of 30 318 patients. Follow-up ended in February 2021. Exposures: Bariatric surgery (n = 5053), including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, vs nonsurgical care (n = 25 265). Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox regression analysis estimated time to incident obesity-associated cancer (a composite of 13 cancer types as the primary end point) and cancer-related mortality. Results: The study included 30 318 patients (median age, 46 years; median body mass index, 45; 77% female; and 73% White) with a median follow-up of 6.1 years (IQR, 3.8-8.9 years). The mean between-group difference in body weight at 10 years was 24.8 kg (95% CI, 24.6-25.1 kg) or a 19.2% (95% CI, 19.1%-19.4%) greater weight loss in the bariatric surgery group. During follow-up, 96 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 780 patients in the nonsurgical control group had an incident obesity-associated cancer (incidence rate of 3.0 events vs 4.6 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-3.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 4.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-5.3%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-2.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87], P = .002). Cancer-related mortality occurred in 21 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 205 patients in the nonsurgical control group (incidence rate of 0.6 events vs 1.2 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of cancer-related mortality at 10 years was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) in the bariatric surgery group and 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.31-0.88], P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with obesity, bariatric surgery compared with no surgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Neoplasias , Obesidad , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/mortalidad , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/mortalidad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pérdida de Peso
14.
Clin Epigenetics ; 14(1): 18, 2022 02 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35115040

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important factor for both treatment and prognosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). Current methods are insufficient to evaluate LNM in EGC due to suboptimal accuracy. Herein, we aim to identify methylation signatures for LNM of EGC, facilitate precision diagnosis, and guide treatment modalities. METHODS: For marker discovery, genome-wide methylation sequencing was performed in a cohort (marker discovery) using 47 fresh frozen (FF) tissue samples. The identified signatures were subsequently characterized for model development using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples by qPCR assay in a second cohort (model development cohort, n = 302, training set: n = 151, test set: n = 151). The performance of the established model was further validated using FFPE samples in a third cohorts (validation cohort, n = 130) and compared with image-based diagnostics, conventional clinicopathology-based model (conventional model), and current standard workups. RESULTS: Fifty LNM-specific methylation signatures were identified de novo and technically validated. A derived 3-marker methylation model for LNM diagnosis was established that achieved an AUC of 0.87 and 0.88, corresponding to the specificity of 80.9% and 85.7%, sensitivity of 80.6% and 78.1%, and accuracy of 80.8% and 83.8% in the test set of model development cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Notably, this methylation model outperformed computed tomography (CT)-based imaging with a superior AUC (0.88 vs. 0.57, p < 0.0001) and individual clinicopathological features in the validation cohort. The model integrated with clinicopathological features demonstrated further enhanced AUCs of 0.89 in the same cohort. The 3-marker methylation model and integrated model reduced 39.4% and 41.5% overtreatment as compared to standard workups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 3-marker methylation model was established and validated that shows diagnostic potential to identify LNM in EGC patients and thus reduce unnecessary gastrectomy in EGC.


Asunto(s)
Metilación de ADN/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Metilación de ADN/fisiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/fisiopatología
15.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2022: 6914157, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35096134

RESUMEN

This study was aimed at investigating the location of gastric cancer by using a gastroscope image based on an artificial intelligence algorithm for gastric cancer and the effect of ultrasonic-guided nerve block combined with general anesthesia on patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. A total of 160 patients who were undergoing gastric cancer surgery from March 2019 to March 2021 were collected as the research objects, and the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm was used to segment the gastroscope image of gastric cancer. The patients were randomly divided into a simple general anesthesia group of 80 cases and a transversus abdominis plane block combined with rectus abdominis sheath block combined with the general anesthesia group of 80 cases. Then, compare the systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) at the four time points T0, T1, T2, and T3. The times of analgesic drug use within 48 hours after operation and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were also recorded at 4 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. The results show that the image quality after segmentation is good: the accuracy of tumor location is 75.67%, which is similar to that of professional endoscopists. Compared with the general anesthesia group, the transversus abdominis plane block combined with the rectus sheath block combined with the general anesthesia group had fewer anesthetics, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with the general anesthesia group, SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly reduced at T1, T2, and T3 in the transverse abdominis plane block combined with rectus sheath block and general anesthesia group (P < 0.05). Compared with the simple general anesthesia group, the VAS scores of the transversus abdominis plane block combined with rectus sheath block combined with the general anesthesia group decreased at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The number of analgesics used in transversus abdominis plane block combined with the rectus sheath block combined with the general anesthesia group within 48 hours after operation was significantly less than that in the general anesthesia group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The average incidence of adverse reactions in the nerve block combined with the general anesthesia group was 2.5%, which was lower than the average incidence of 3.75% in the general anesthesia group. In summary, the CNN algorithm can accurately segment the lesions in the ultrasonic images of gastric cancer, which was convenient for doctors to make a more accurate judgment on the lesions, and provided a basis for the preoperative examination of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ultrasonic-guided nerve block combined with general anesthesia can effectively improve the analgesic effect of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, reduced intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions and analgesic drug dosage, and had a good effect on postoperative recovery of patients. The combined application of these two methods can further improve the precision treatment of gastric cancer patients and accelerate postoperative recovery.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Inteligencia Artificial , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia General , Biología Computacional , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Can J Surg ; 65(1): E38-E44, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Ontario, bariatric surgery is publicly funded and is performed only in accredited tertiary care hospitals. The purpose of our study was to report on the safety and outcomes of performing bariatric surgery at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital in southern Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult (age ≥ 18 yr) patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the ambulatory site of our tertiary care hospital between September 2016 and August 2018. The 2 sites are 1.4 km apart. Patient demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, intraoperative and 90-day postoperative complications, number of transfers and readmission to the tertiary care hospital, and emergency department visits were collected. RESULTS: A total of 314 patients (285 women [90.8%] and 29 men [9.2%] with a mean age of 41.8 yr [standard deviation (SD) 8.9 yr]) underwent surgery: LRYGB in 295 cases (93.9%) and LSG in 19 (6.0%). The mean body mass index was 45.3 (SD 5.1), the median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 (range 2-4), and the median Edmonton Obesity Staging System score was 2 (range 0-4). The mean operative time was 119.8 (SD 23.1) minutes for LRYGB and 96.2 (SD 22.0) minutes for LSG, and the mean length of stay was 2.1 (SD 0.6) days and 2.1 (SD 0.2) days, respectively. Thirteen patients (4.1%) required transfer to the tertiary care hospital for a postoperative complication. Of 312 patients, 29 (9.3%) presented to emergency department within 90 days after surgery, and 8 (2.6%) required readmission to hospital; no deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that LRYGB and LSG can be performed safely at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital. However, caution should be exercised in performing these procedures at an ambulatory site without a tertiary care hospital affiliation, as patients may require urgent transfer for a serious postoperative complication.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Ontario/epidemiología , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
17.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 107(2): e756-e766, 2022 01 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34463768

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) differentially affect postprandial gastrointestinal hormones and ß-cell function in type 2 diabetes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare gastrointestinal hormones and ß-cell function, assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 5 weeks and 1 year after surgery, hypothesizing higher glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels and greater ß-cell response to glucose after RYGB than after SG. METHODS: This study was a randomized, triple-blind, single-center trial at a tertiary care center in Norway. The primary outcomes were diabetes remission and IVGTT-derived ß-cell function. Participants with obesity and type 2 diabetes were allocated (1:1) to RYGB or SG. We measured gastrointestinal hormone profiles and insulin secretion as ß-cell glucose sensitivity (ß-GS) derived from 180-minute OGTTs. RESULTS: Participants were 106 patients (67% women), mean (SD) age 48 (10) years. Diabetes remission rates at 1 year were higher after RYGB than after SG (77% vs 48%; P = 0.002). Incremental area under the curve (iAUC0-180) GLP-1 and ß-GS increased more after RYGB than after SG, with 1-year between-group difference 1173 pmol/L*min (95% CI, 569-1776; P = 0.0010) and 0.45 pmol/kg/min/mmol (95% CI, 0.15-0.75; P = 0.0032), respectively. After surgery, fasting and postprandial ghrelin levels were higher and decremental AUC0-180 ghrelin, iAUC0-180 glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and iAUC0-60 glucagon were greater after RYGB than after SG. Diabetes remission at 1 year was associated with higher ß-GS and higher GLP-1 secretion. CONCLUSION: RYGB was associated with greater improvement in ß-cell function and higher postprandial GLP-1 levels than SG.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/sangre , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/sangre , Obesidad Mórbida/metabolismo , Periodo Posprandial , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Diabetes Investig ; 13(1): 74-84, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265175

RESUMEN

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To compare glycemic control 1 year after treatment in patients with mildly obese (body mass index 27.5-34.9 kg/m2 ) type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent bariatric surgery (BS) to those who received medical treatment (MT) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study using real-world data was carried out in electronic medical records from a tertiary care hospital and in the Japanese Medical Data Center Inc. claim database from 2008 to 2019. Each patient was propensity score-matched between the BS and the MT group by age, sex, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin and type 2 diabetes mellitus duration, and compared from the index date to the 1 year post-index. RESULTS: The study included 78 patients in the BS group and 238 patients in the MT group. The mean body mass index in the BS and the MT group was 32.1 and 32.0 kg/m2 , respectively. In the BS group, the patients underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenojejunal bypass. The diabetes remission rate (glycated hemoglobin <6.5% without diabetes medication) at 1 year was 59.0% in the BS group and 0.4% in the MT group (P < 0.0001). Optimal glycemic control of glycated hemoglobin <7.0% was achieved in 75.6% in the BS group and in 29.0% in the MT group (P < 0.0001). The median monthly drug costs for metabolic syndrome decreased from $US126.5 (at baseline) to $US0.0 (at 1 year) in the BS group, whereas it increased from $US52.4 to $US58.3 in the MT group. CONCLUSIONS: BS for mildly obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is more clinically- and cost-effective than MT in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Control Glucémico/métodos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/terapia , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Japón , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/complicaciones , Síndrome Metabólico/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Surg Today ; 52(2): 231-238, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34286401

RESUMEN

PURPOSES: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected socioeconomic and healthcare systems in many countries. Accordingly, many individuals may have canceled their annual health-check programs, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which would have resulted in lower numbers of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer in comparison to other times. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to 62 hospitals every week from May 2020 to August 2020 (total 744) through mailing lists of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The number of patients with gastric cancer and hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic were surveyed. RESULTS: In total, 74% (551 out of 744) of the questionnaires were answered and analyzed. In early May, approximately 50% of hospitals had to restrict surgical slots due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they gradually loosened the restrictions thereafter. The number of gastrectomies was < 80% that of the same period in the previous year, and hospitals in Tokyo were seriously affected by a 50% decrease in the number of gastrectomies. CONCLUSIONS: The number of gastrectomies was lower than that in the previous year. Further multi-center follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Japón , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 1193, 2021 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34758772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the type of anesthesia and the survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients is uncertain. This study compared the overall outcome of gastric cancer patients after surgery with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or inhalation anesthesia (IHA). METHODS: Clinicopathological variables of gastric cancer patients were retrieved from the database of the Surgical Gastric Cancer Patient Registry in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients were grouped according to whether they received TIVA or IHA during the operation. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to balance the baseline variables, and survival outcomes were compared between these two groups. In addition, studies comparing survival outcomes between TIVA and IHA used for gastric cancer surgery and published before April 20th, 2020, were identified, and their data were pooled. RESULTS: A total of 2827 patients who underwent surgical treatment from Jan 2009 to Dec 2016 were included. There were 323 patients in the TIVA group and 645 patients in the IHA group, with 1:2 PS matching. There was no significant difference in overall survival outcomes between the TIVA and IHA groups before matching the cohort (p = 0.566) or after matching the cohort (p = 0.679) by log-rank tests. In the Cox hazard regression model, there was no significant difference between the TIVA and IHA groups before (HR: 1.054, 95% CI: 0.881-1.262, p = 0.566) or after (HR: 0.957, 95% CI: 0.779-1.177, p = 0.679) PS matching. The meta-analysis of survival outcomes between the TIVA and IHA groups found critical statistical value in the before PS matching cohort (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.96 p < 0.01) and after PS matching cohort (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.94, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with the results of previous studies, total intravenous anesthesia has been shown to be superior to inhalation anesthesia in terms of overall survival for gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. The selection of intravenous or inhalation anesthesia for gastric cancer surgery should take into account the long-term prognosis of the patient.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia por Inhalación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Intravenosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Anestesia por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Anestesia Intravenosa/efectos adversos , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...