Erlotinib or Gefitinib for Treating Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a National Whole-of-Patient-Population Retrospective Cohort Study and Results of a Validation Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Starting in 2010, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib were introduced into routine use in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) for treating advanced lung cancer, but their impact in this setting is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The study described in this protocol aims to understand the effectiveness and safety of these new personalized lung cancer treatments and the contributions made by concomitant medicines and other factors to adverse outcomes in the general NZ patient population. A substudy aimed to validate national electronic health databases as the data source and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying outcomes and variables. METHODS: This study will include all NZ patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were first dispensed erlotinib or gefitinib before October 1, 2020, and followed until death or for at least 1 year. Routinely collected health administrative and clinical data will be collated from national electronic cancer registration, hospital discharge, mortality registration, and pharmaceutical dispensing databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes will be time to treatment discontinuation and serious adverse events, respectively. The primary variable will be high-risk concomitant medicines use with erlotinib or gefitinib. For the validation substudy (n=100), data from clinical records were compared to those from national electronic health databases and analyzed by agreement analysis for categorical data and by paired 2-tailed t tests for numerical data. RESULTS: In the validation substudy, national electronic health databases and clinical records agreed in determining patient eligibility and for identifying serious adverse events, high-risk concomitant medicines use, and other categorical data with overall agreement and κ statistic of >90% and >0.8000, respectively; for example, for the determination of patient eligibility, the comparison of proxy and standard eligibility criteria applied to national electronic health databases and clinical records, respectively, showed overall agreement and κ statistic of 96% and 0.8936, respectively. Dates for estimating time to treatment discontinuation and other numerical variables and outcomes showed small differences, mostly with nonsignificant P values and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference; for example, for the dates of the first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib, national electronic health databases and clinical records differed on average by approximately 4 days with a nonsignificant P value of .33 and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference. As of May 2024, the main study is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol is presented for a national whole-of-patient-population retrospective cohort study designed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during their first decade of routine use in NZ for treating EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. The validation substudy demonstrated the feasibility and validity of using national electronic health databases and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying the study outcomes and variables proposed in the study protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000998549; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368928. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/51381.

METTL1/FOXM1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression and gefitinib resistance by inhibiting PTPN13 expression.

INTRODUCTION: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common malignant tumor in respiratory system. Methyltransferase-like 1 (METTL1) is a driver of m7G modification in mRNA. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of METTL1 in the proliferation, invasion and Gefitinib-resistance of LUAD. METHODS: Public datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) and GSE31210 datasets. Malignant tumor phenotypes were tested in vitro and in vivo through biological function assays and nude mouse with xenograft tumors. RNA immunoprecipitation assays were conducted to determine the interaction between METTL1 protein and FOXM1 mRNA. Public transcriptional database, Chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase report assays were conducted to detect the downstream target of a transcriptional factor FOXM1. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated to evaluate the sensitivity to Gefitinib in LUAD cells. RESULTS: The results showed that METTL1 was upregulated in LUAD, and the high expression of METTL1 was associated with unfavorable prognosis. Through the m7G-dependent manner, METTL1 improved the RNA stability of FOXM1, leading to the up-regulation of FOXM1. FOXM1 transcriptionally suppressed PTPN13 expression. The METTL1/FOXM1/PTPN13 axis reduced the sensitivity of LUAD cells to Gefitinib. Taken together, our data suggested that METTL1 plays oncogenic role in LUAD through inducing the m7G modification of FOXM1, therefore METTL1 probably is a new potential therapeutic target to counteract Gefitinib resistance in LUAD.

IGFBP2/ITGA5 promotes gefitinib resistance via activating STAT3/CXCL1 axis in non-small cell lung cancer.

There is a paucity of comprehensive knowledge pertaining to the underlying mechanisms leading to gefitinib resistance in individuals diagnosed NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations who inevitably develop resistance to gefitinib treatment within six months to one year. In our preceding investigations, we have noted a marked upregulation of IGFBP2 in the neoplastic tissues of NSCLC, predominantly in the periphery of the tissue, implying its plausible significance in NSCLC. Consequently, in the current research, we delved into the matter and ascertained the molecular mechanisms that underlie the participation of IGFBP2 in the emergence of gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells. Firstly, the expression of IGFBP2 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung cancer tissues of 20 NSCLC patients with gefitinib tolerance was found to be significantly higher than that of non-tolerant patients. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that IGFBP2 plays a significant role in the acquisition of gefitinib resistance. Mechanistically, IGFBP2 can activate STAT3 to enhance the transcriptional activity of CXCL1, thereby increasing the intracellular expression level of CXCL1, which contributes to the survival of lung cancer cells in the gefitinib environment. Additionally, we identified ITGA5 as a key player in IGFBP2-mediated gefitinib resistance, but it does not function as a membrane receptor in the process of linking IGFBP2 to intracellular signaling transduction. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the promoting role and mechanism of IGFBP2 in acquired gefitinib resistance caused by non-EGFR secondary mutations, suggesting the potential of IGFBP2 as a biomarker for gefitinib resistance and a potential intervention target.

Gefitinib metabolism-related lncRNAs for the prediction of prognosis, tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma.

The complete compound of gefitinib is effective in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. However, the effect on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) during its catabolism has not yet been elucidated. We carried out this study to examine the predictive value of gefitinib metabolism-related long noncoding RNAs (GMLncs) in LUAD patients. To filter GMLncs and create a prognostic model, we employed Pearson correlation, Lasso, univariate Cox, and multivariate Cox analysis. We combined risk scores and clinical features to create nomograms for better application in clinical settings. According to the constructed prognostic model, we performed GO/KEGG and GSEA enrichment analysis, tumor immune microenvironment analysis, immune evasion and immunotherapy analysis, somatic cell mutation analysis, drug sensitivity analysis, IMvigor210 immunotherapy validation, stem cell index analysis and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis. We built a predictive model with 9 GMLncs, which showed good predictive performance in validation and training sets. The calibration curve demonstrated excellent agreement between the expected and observed survival rates, for which the predictive performance was better than that of the nomogram without a risk score. The metabolism of gefitinib is related to the cytochrome P450 pathway and lipid metabolism pathway, and may be one of the causes of gefitinib resistance, according to analyses from the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Immunological evasion and immunotherapy analysis revealed that the likelihood of immune evasion increased with risk score. Tumor microenvironment analysis found most immune cells at higher concentrations in the low-risk group. Drug sensitivity analysis found 23 sensitive drugs. Twenty-one of these drugs exhibited heightened sensitivity in the high-risk group. RT-qPCR analysis validated the characteristics of 9 GMlncs. The predictive model and nomogram that we constructed have good application value in evaluating the prognosis of patients and guiding clinical treatment.

[Resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogenic addictions: BRAF and ALK]. / Résistance aux anti-EGFR via l'acquisition successive et cumulée de deux nouvelles addictions oncogénique BRAF et ALK.

Targeted therapies are the standard first-line treatment for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with certain molecular abnormalities. These abnormalities are particularly common in Southeast Asia and French Polynesia. A 51-year-old Tahitian female non-smoker was diagnosed in 2018 with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring a p.L858R EGFR mutation. She received gefitinib as first-line treatment. Due to locoregional progression and the presence of a resistance mutation (p.T790M of EFGR), she received osimertinib as second-line treatment, after which chemotherapy was proposed as 3rd-line treatment. An additional biopsy detected not only the previously known EGFR mutation, but also a BRAF p.V600E mutation. Following disease progression during chemotherapy, the patient received targeted therapies combining dabrafenib, trametinib and osimertinib. Due to a dissociated response after four months of treatment, a 5th line of paclitaxel bevacizumab was initiated. Subsequent to additional progression and given the ALK rearrangement shown on the re-biopsy, 6th-line treatment with alectinib was proposed. As the response was once again dissociated, a final line was proposed before stopping active treatments due to their toxicity and overall deterioration in the patient's state of health. This exceptional case is characterized by resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogene addictions. The authors underline the importance of re-biopsy at each progression, leading (if at all feasible) to yet around round of targeted therapy.

Gefitinib vs Gefitinib Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in EGFR-Variant Lung Cancer-Long-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

This randomized clinical trial examines whether adding chemotherapy with pemetrexed and carboplatin to gefitinib improves survival among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)­variant non­small cell lung cancer.

YES1 as a potential target to overcome drug resistance in EGFR-deregulated non-small cell lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib and osimertinib have primarily been used as first-line treatments for patients with EGFR-activating mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Novel biomarkers are required to distinguish patients with lung cancer who are resistant to EGFR-TKIs. The aim of the study is to investigate the expression and functional role of YES1, one of the Src-family kinases, in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC. YES1 expression was elevated in gefitinib-resistant HCC827 (HCC827/GR) cells, harboring EGFR mutations. Moreover, HCC827/GR cells exhibited increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels compared to those of the parent cells, resulting in the phosphorylation/activation of YES1 due to oxidation of the cysteine residue. HCC827/GR cells showed elevated expression levels of YES1-associated protein 1 (YAP1), NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), cancer stemness-related markers, and antioxidant proteins compared to those of the parent cells. Knockdown of YES1 in HCC827/GR cells suppressed YAP1 phosphorylation, leading to the inhibition of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Cyclin D1 expression. Silencing YES1 markedly attenuated the proliferation, migration, and tumorigenicity of HCC827/GR cells. Dasatinib inhibited the proliferation of HCC827/GR cells by targeting YES1-mediated signaling pathways. Furthermore, the combination of gefitinib and dasatinib demonstrated a synergistic effect in suppressing the proliferation of HCC827/GR cells. Notably, YES1- and Nrf2-regulated genes showed a positive regulatory relationship in patients with lung cancer and in TKI-resistant NSCLC cell lines. Taken together, these findings suggest that modulation of YES1 expression and activity may be an attractive therapeutic strategy for the treatment of drug-resistant NSCLC.

Deleterious association between proton pump inhibitor and protein kinase inhibitor exposure and survival for patients with lung cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have identified an interaction between protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with lung cancer. This type of interaction may reduce the efficacy of PKIs. However, the effect of PKI-PPI interaction on patient mortality remains controversial. This study set out to determine the impact of PKI-PPI interaction on overall survival for lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using data from the French National Health Care Database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. We identified patients with: (i) an age equal to or greater than 18 years; (ii) lung cancer; and (iii) at least one reimbursement for one of the following drugs: erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and osimertinib. Patients were followed-up between the first date of PKI reimbursement and either December 31, 2021 or if they died, the date on which death occurred. The cumulative exposure to PPI duration during PKI treatment was calculated as the ratio between the number of concomitant exposure days to PKI and PPI and the number of exposure days to PKI. A survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was then performed to assess the risk of death following exposure to a PKI-PPI interaction. RESULTS: 34,048 patients received at least one reimbursement for PKIs of interest in our study: 26,133 (76.8 %) were exposed to erlotinib; 3,142 (9.2 %) to gefitinib; 1,417 (4.2 %) to afatinib; and 3,356 (9.9 %) to osimertinib. Patients with concomitant exposure to PKI-PPI interaction during 20 % or more of the PKI treatment period demonstrated an increased risk of death (HR, 1.60 [95 % CI, 1.57-1.64]) compared to other patients. When this cut-off varied from 10 % to 80 %, the estimated HR ranged from 1.46 [95 % CI, 1.43-1.50] to 2.19 [95 % CI, 2.12-2.25]. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In our study, an elevated risk of death was observed in patients exposed to PKI-PPI interaction. Finally, we were able to identify a dose-dependent effect for this interaction. This deleterious effect of osimertinib and PPI was revealed for the first time in real life conditions.

New-onset keratitis associated with epidermal growth factor receptor-based targeted therapies in Han Chinese patients with lung cancer: A multi-center cohort study.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk and incidence of keratitis following treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) and subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis. METHODS: This multi-center cohort study included EGFRi-treated patients and non-users with lung cancer between 2010 and 2023. EGFRi included first-generation agent gefitinib and erlotinib, second-generation agent afatinib, and third-generation agent osimertinib. The primary outcome was new-onset keratitis. Cox proportional hazard models with multivariable adjustment were applied to determine the effect of EGFRi on keratitis over time. Subgroup analyses were conducted, stratified by agents of EGFRi. Sub-outcome analyses were performed to identify the subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis. RESULTS: A total of 1549 EGFRi-treated patients and 6146 non-users were included. 38 (2.5%) EGFRi-treated patients developed keratitis. The incidence of keratitis in EGFRi-treated patients was significantly higher than that in controls (incidence rate, IR, per 1000 person-years = 14.7 vs 4.49, p < 0.0001). EGFRi-treated patients presented with an increased risk for keratitis (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.85-5.35, p < 0.001). Erlotinib (aHR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.35-5.15, p = 0.004), afatinib (aHR = 4.42, 95% CI = 2.17-9.02, p < 0.001), and osimertinib (aHR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.60-13.64, p = 0.005), but not gefitinib (aHR = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.96-5.55, p = 0.063), significantly contributed to the risk of keratitis. Subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis included corneal ulcer (IR = 2.31 vs 0.166, p < 0.0001) and keratoconjunctivitis (IR = 9.27 vs 2.91, p < 0.0001). None of the EGFRi-treated patients developed perforated corneal ulcer, interstitial and deep keratitis, or corneal neovascularization. CONCLUSION: Treatment with EGFRi was associated with an increased risk of keratitis. Ocular toxicity of EGFRi was highest for third-generation agents, followed by second-generation agents, and then first-generation agents.

Osimertinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Overall Survival, Post-progression Management and Budget Impact Analysis in Real-World.

INTRODUCTION: The observational multicenter prospective FLOWER study (NCT04965701) confirmed effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in the real-world (RW) management of untreated EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. METHODS: Herein, we report updated survival data, post-progression management, cost/effectiveness and budget impact (BI) of osimertinib compared with a RW population receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. RESULTS: Overall, 189 Caucasian patients receiving first-line osimertinib were included. After a follow-up of 20.7 months, 74(39.2%) patients discontinued osimertinib, median time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 27.9 months, overall survival 36.8 months. At progression, tissue biopsy was performed in 29 (56.9%), liquid biopsy in 15 (29.4%) and both in 7 (13.7%) cases. The most frequent resistant mechanism was MET amplification (N = 14, 29.8%). At data cutoff, 13 (6.9%) patients were continuing osimertinib beyond progression; 52 (67.5%) received second-line treatment; no further treatments were administered in 25 (32.5%) cases. Thirty-three (63.4%) patients received chemotherapy, 12(23.1%) TKIs combination. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a total cost per patient based on RW mTTD of 98,957.34€, 21,726.28€ and 19,637.83€ for osimertinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/month for osimertinib was 359,806.0€/life-year-gained (LYG) and 197,789.77€/LYG compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. For osimertinib, the BI-gap between RW-TTD and theoretical-TTD was 16,501.0€ per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis confirms the effectiveness of osimertinib in RW. Although the ICER of osimertinib seems not cost-effective, additional costs for the management of disease progression to old generation TKIs were not considered in this study. The BI-gap suggests RW mTTD as a more reliable measure for expense estimation.

Synergistic anti-tumor effects of lenalidomide and gefitinib by upregulating ADRB2 and inactivating the mTOR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma.

Gefitinib is commonly used to be the first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therapeutic effect of gefitinib is reduced due to acquired resistance, and combined treatment is recommended. In this research, we planned to explore the impacts of combined treatment of lenalidomide and gefitinib on gefitinib-sensitive or -resistant NSCLC cells. The co-treatment results demonstrated that enhanced antitumor impact on NSCLC cell growth, migration, invasion, cell cycle process and apoptosis. The tumor-bearing mouse models were established using PC9/GR cells. In vivo assays also showed that lenalidomide and gefitinib synergistically inhibited mouse tumor growth along increased the survival of mice. ADRB2 was identified as a lowly expressed gene in PC9/GR cells and LUAD tumor tissues. LUAD patients with high ADRB2 expression were indicated with favorable survival outcomes. Moreover, ADRB2 was upregulated in lenalidomide and/or gefitinib-treated PC9/GR cells. ADRB2 deficiency partially offsets the suppressive impacts of lenalidomide and gefitinib co-treatment on the viability and proliferation of PC9/GR cells. Additionally, lenalidomide and gefitinib cotreatment significantly inactivated the mTOR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway compared with each treatment alone. Rescue assays were performed to explore whether lenalidomide and gefitinib synergistically inhibited the growth of PC9/GR cells via the PI3K/AKT pathway. PI3K activator SC79 significantly restored reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion along with elevated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis caused by lenalidomide and gefitinib cotreatment. In conclusion, lenalidomide and gefitinib synergistically suppressed LUAD progression and attenuated gefitinib resistance by upregulating ADRB2 and inactivating the mTOR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma.

Chidamide improves gefitinib treatment outcomes in NSCLC by attenuating recruitment and immunosuppressive function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Clinical resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant challenge. Recent studies have indicated that the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) increases following gefitinib treatment, correlating with a poor patient response in NSCLC. Our study revealed that gefitinib treatment stimulates the production of CCL2, which subsequently enhances monocyte (M)-MDSC migration to tumor sites. Chidamide, a selective inhibitor of the histone deacetylase subtype, counteracted the gefitinib-induced increase in CCL2 levels in tumor cells. Additionally, chidamide down-regulated the expression of CCR2 in M-MDSCs, inhibiting their migration. Furthermore, chidamide attenuated the immunosuppressive function of M-MDSCs both alone and in combination with gefitinib. Chidamide also alleviated tumor immunosuppression by reducing the number of M-MDSCs in LLC-bearing mice, thereby enhancing the antitumor efficacy of gefitinib. In conclusion, our findings suggest that chidamide can improve gefitinib treatment outcomes, indicating that MDSCs are promising targets in NSCLC.

A Phase II trial of alternating osimertinib and gefitinib therapy in advanced EGFR-T790M positive non-small cell lung cancer: OSCILLATE.

In this phase II, single arm trial (ACTRN12617000720314), we investigate if alternating osimertinib and gefitinib would delay the development of resistance to osimertinib in advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation (n = 47) by modulating selective pressure on resistant clones. The primary endpoint is progression free-survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, and secondary endpoints include: feasibility of alternating therapy, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 12-month PFS rate is 38% (95% CI 27.5-55), not meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis reveals decrease and clearance of the original activating EGFR and EGFR-T790M mutations which are prognostic of clinical outcomes. In 73% of participants, loss of T790M ctDNA is observed at progression and no participants have evidence of the EGFR C797S resistance mutation following the alternating regimen. These findings highlight the challenges of treatment strategies designed to modulate clonal evolution and the clinical importance of resistance mechanisms beyond suppression of selected genetic mutations in driving therapeutic escape to highly potent targeted therapies.

ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 Pathway Contributes to Acquired Resistance to Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The development of acquired resistance to small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling has hindered their efficacy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Our previous study showed that constitutive activation of the 70 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) contributes to the acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC cell lines and xenograft tumors in nude mice. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying S6K1 constitutive activation in TKI-resistant cancer cells have not yet been explored. In this study, we recapitulated this finding by taking advantage of a gefitinib-resistant patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model established through a number of passages in mice treated with increasing doses of gefitinib. The dissociated primary cells from the resistant PDX tumors (PDX-R) displayed higher levels of phosphor-S6K1 expression and were resistant to gefitinib compared to cells from passage-matched parental PDX tumors (PDX-P). Both genetic and pharmacological inhibition of S6K1 increased sensitivity to gefitinib in PDX-R cells. In addition, both total and phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (MTOR) levels were upregulated in PDX-R and gefitinib-resistant PC9G cells. Knockdown of MTOR by siRNA decreased the expression levels of total and phosphor-S6K1 and increased sensitivity to gefitinib in PDX-R and PC9G cells. Moreover, a transcription factor ELK1, which has multiple predicted binding sites on the MTOR promoter, was also upregulated in PDX-R and PC9G cells, while the knockdown of ELK1 led to decreased expression of MTOR and S6K1. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR assay showed the direct binding between ELK1 and the MTOR promoter, and the luciferase reporter assay further indicated that ELK1 could upregulate MTOR expression through tuning up its transcription. Silencing ELK1 via siRNA transfection improved the efficacy of gefitinib in PDX-R and PC9G cells. These results support the notion that activation of ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 signaling contributes to acquired resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC. The findings in this study shed new light on the mechanism for acquired EGFR-TKI resistance and provide potential novel strategies by targeting the ELK1/MTOR/S6K1 pathway.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Phosphorylation of AGO2 by TBK1 Promotes the Formation of Oncogenic miRISC in NSCLC.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly lethal tumor that often develops resistance to targeted therapy. It is shown that Tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylates AGO2 at S417 (pS417-AGO2), which promotes NSCLC progression by increasing the formation of microRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC). High levels of pS417-AGO2 in clinical NSCLC specimens are positively associated with poor prognosis. Interestingly, the treatment with EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib can significantly induce pS417-AGO2, thereby increasing the formation and activity of oncogenic miRISC, which may contribute to NSCLC resistance to Gefitinib. Based on these, two therapeutic strategies is developed. One is jointly to antagonize multiple oncogenic miRNAs highly expressed in NSCLC and use TBK1 inhibitor Amlexanox reducing the formation of oncogenic miRISC. Another approach is to combine Gefitinib with Amlexanox to inhibit the progression of Gefitinib-resistant NSCLC. This findings reveal a novel mechanism of oncogenic miRISC regulation by TBK1-mediated pS417-AGO2 and suggest potential therapeutic approaches for NSCLC.

[Combination of shikonin and gefitinib reverses drug resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer and its mechanism].

The occurrence and development of tumors are associated with the cell energy metabolism. Inhibiting energy metabolism of lung cancer cells is an important strategy to overcome drug resistance. Based on the cellular energy metabolism pathway, this study observed the effect of combination of shikonin(SKN) and gefitinib(GFB) on the drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer and explored the underlying mechanism. The human non-small cell lung cancer line HCC827/GR resistant to gefitinib was used as the cell model in vitro. The CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry were employed to investigate the cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. The high performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the intracellular accumulation of GFB. A Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer was used to detect the changes of cellular energy metabolism. Western blot was employed to determine the expression of the proteins involved in the drug resistance. The tumor-bearing nude mouse model was used to verify the efficacy of SKN+GFB in overcoming drug resistance in vivo. The results showed that SKN+GFB significantly reduced the IC_(50) of GFB on HCC827/GR cells, with the combination index of 0.628, indicating that the combination of the two drugs had a synergistic effect and promoted cell apoptosis. SKN increased the intracellular accumulation of GFB. SKN+GFB lowered the oxygen consumption rate(OCR) and glycolytic proton efflux rate(GlycoPER) in cell energy metabolism, and down-regulated the overexpression of PKM2, p-EGFR, P-gp, and HIF-1α in drug resistance. The results of reversing drug resistance test in vivo showed that GFB or SKN alone had no significant antitumor effect, while the combination at different doses induced the apoptosis of the tumor tissue and inhibited the expression of PKM2 and P-gp, demonstrating a significant antitumor effect. Moreover, the tumor inhibition rate in the high-dose combination group reached 64.01%. In summary, SKN+GFB may interfere with the energy metabolism to limit the function of HCC827/GR cells, thus reversing the GFB resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

Leucine Zipper Downregulated in Cancer-1 Interacts with Clathrin Adaptors to Control Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Internalization and Gefitinib Response in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a common driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clathrin-mediated internalization (CMI) sustains EGFR signaling. AXL is associated with resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated (EGFRM) NSCLC. We investigated the effects of Leucine zipper downregulated in cancer-1 (LDOC1) on EGFR CMI and NSCLC treatment. Coimmunoprecipitation, double immunofluorescence staining, confocal microscopy analysis, cell surface labelling assays, and immunohistochemistry studies were conducted. We revealed that LDOC1 interacts with clathrin adaptors through binding motifs. LDOC1 depletion promotes internalization and plasma membrane recycling of EGFR in EGFRM NSCLC PC9 and HCC827 cells. Membranous and cytoplasmic EGFR decreased and increased, respectively, in LDOC1 (-) NSCLC tumors. LDOC1 depletion enhanced and sustained activation of EGFR, AXL, and HER2 and enhanced activation of HER3 in PC9 and HCC827 cells. Sensitivity to first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) was significantly reduced in LDOC1-depleted PC9 and HCC827 cells. Moreover, LDOC1 downregulation was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with poor overall survival in patients with EGFRM NSCLC receiving gefitinib (n = 100). In conclusion, LDOC1 may regulate the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKIs by participating in the CMI of EGFR. Accordingly, LDOC1 may function as a prognostic biomarker for EGFRM NSCLC.

Ningetinib plus gefitinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with MET and AXL dysregulations: A phase 1b clinical trial and biomarker analysis.

BACKGROUND: MET and AXL dysregulations are implicated in acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC. But consensus on the optimal definition for MET/AXL dysregulations in EGFR-mutant NSCLC is lacking. Here, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of ningetinib (a MET/AXL inhibitor) plus gefitinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and evaluated the clinical relevance of MET/AXL dysregulations by different definitions. METHODS: Patients in this phase 1b dose-escalation/dose-expansion trial received ningetinib 30 mg/40 mg/60 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were tolerability (dose-escalation) and objective response rate (dose-expansion). MET/AXL status were analyzed using FISH and IHC. RESULTS: Between March 2017 and January 2021, 108 patients were enrolled. The proportion of MET focal amplification, MET polysomy, MET overexpression, AXL amplification and AXL overexpression is 18.1 %, 5.6 %, 55.8 %, 8.1 % and 45.3 %, respectively. 6.8 % patients have concurrent MET amplification and AXL overexpression. ORR is 30.8 % for tumors with MET amplification, 0 % for MET polysomy, 24.1 % for MET overexpression, 20 % for AXL amplification and 27.6 % for AXL overexpression. For patients with concurrent MET amplification and AXL overexpression, ningetinib plus gefitinib provides an ORR of 80 %, DCR of 100 % and median PFS of 4.7 months. Tumors with higher MET copy number and AXL expression tend to have higher likelihood of response. Biomarker analyses show that MET focal amplification and overexpression are complementary in predicting clinical benefit from MET inhibition, while AXL dysregulations defined by an arbitrary level may dilute the efficacy of AXL blockade. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that combined blockade of MET, AXL and EGFR is a feasible strategy for a subset of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinadrugtrials.org.cn, CTR20160875.

Effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for treatment-naïve elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multi-institute retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In real-world practice, most patients with lung cancer are diagnosed when they are aged ≥65 years. However, clinical trials tend to lack data for the elderly population. Therefore, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were enrolled at many hospitals in Taiwan. Patient characteristics and the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib were compared. RESULTS: This study enrolled 1,343 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, of whom 554 were aged <65 years, 383 were aged 65-74 years, 323 were aged 75-84 years, and 83 were aged ≥85 years. For elderly patients, afatinib was more effective, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 22.2 months, than gefitinib (9.9 months and 17.7 months, respectively) and erlotinib (10.8 months and 18.5 months, respectively; PFS: p = 0.003; OS: p = 0.026). However, grade ≥3 adverse events, including skin toxicities, paronychia, mucositis, and diarrhea, were more frequently experienced by patients receiving afatinib than those receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study provides real-world evidence of the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, a population that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and real-world evidence. Afatinib was more effective as a first-line treatment than gefitinib or erlotinib for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.