Abortion Stigma as a Barrier to Mifepristone Use among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Alabama for Early Pregnancy Loss.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to identify and characterize barriers to mifepristone use among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) for early pregnancy loss in a southern US state. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 19 OB-GYNs in Alabama who manage early pregnancy loss. The interviews explored participants' knowledge of and experience with mifepristone use for miscarriage management and abortion, along with barriers to and facilitators of clinical mifepristone use. The interviews were coded by multiple study staff using inductive and deductive thematic coding. RESULTS: Nearly all of the interviewees identified abortion-related stigma as a barrier to mifepristone use. Interviewees often attributed stigma to a lack of knowledge about the clinical use of mifepristone for early pregnancy loss. The stigmatization of mifepristone due to its association with abortion was related to religious and political objections. Many interviewees also described stigma associated with misoprostol use. Although providers believed that mifepristone use for abortion would not be accepted in their practice, most believed that mifepristone could be used successfully for miscarriage management after practice-wide education on its use. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone is strongly associated with abortion stigma among OB-GYNs in Alabama, which is a barrier to its use for miscarriage management. Interventions to decrease abortion stigma and associated stigma surrounding mifepristone are needed to optimize early pregnancy loss care.

Crisis Management by Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists: Lessons Learned in a Pandemic.

We discuss lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic through an obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) hospitalist lens, with a focus on clinical care considerations, workforce changes, communication and collaboration, and provider wellness. We end with a discussion on the role of OB/GYN hospitalists as leaders. Our goal is to share what worked well for hospital systems and OB/GYN hospitalist teams during COVID-19, along with recommendations to consider for future national emergencies.

Obstetrician-Gynecologist Hospitalists as Educators.

The progressive growth of the hospitalist model of practice over the past 20 years has solidified the role of the obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn) hospitalists as an essential component of quality inpatient care. The ob/gyn hospitalist as an educator is proving to be an important role in the future of hospitalist practice. The role as an educator has long-term benefits and implications for the standardization of education and evidence-based patient care both in community-based and academic practice settings.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists' Impact on Maternal Mortality.

Obstetrics and gynecology hospitalists play a vital role in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality by providing immediate access to obstetric care, especially in emergencies. Their presence in hospitals ensures timely interventions and expert management, contributing to better outcomes for mothers and babies. This proactive approach can extend beyond hospital walls through education, advocacy, and community outreach initiatives aimed at improving maternal health across diverse settings.

Premature ovarian insufficiency: knowledge, attitudes, and quality of care offered by gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE: Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects up to 3% of the global female population, influencing metabolic, cardiovascular, and reproductive health. Medical expertise in diagnosis, effects, and treatment strategies, particularly for gynecologists, is crucial for ensuring improved healthcare for women. The objective of this study is to assess the state of medical knowledge regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of POI among Brazilian gynecologists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using online questionnaires administered to 16,000 members of the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. RESULTS: In total, 460 questionnaires were received from gynecologists who had an average age of 44.49 ± 12.57 years and 19.37 ± 12.95 years of professional experience. Fifty-three percent of gynecologists diagnosed POI correctly, and 49% requested karyotype analysis, while fewer than 10% identified all POI etiologies. Over 90% of gynecologists understood the long-term consequences of POI for bone and cardiovascular health. Despite being a consequence of hypoestrogenism, hormone therapy was recommended only by 20% of doctors, with no more than 50% of them prescribing appropriate doses for young women. Regarding self-perception, 60% of gynecologists declared deficient knowledge regarding how to offer care and guidance to women, with hormone therapy being reported as the most important reason (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Current concepts and guidelines for POI are not adequately understood or applied in Brazilian clinical practice, leading to suboptimal care.

Online Search Interest in Gynecologists After the Release of the Film Barbie.

This cross-sectional study evaluates whether the film Barbie was associated with increased public interest in gynecologic care in the US after its release.

"The habit of keeping silent": An exploratory-descriptive qualitative study of the knowledge and attitudes of Kazakhstani gynecologists toward dyspareunia.

BACKGROUND: Dyspareunia (pain during sex) is a common condition that causes physical and emotional stress for many women. This condition can be caused by various factors, including physical, hormonal, inflammatory, viral, neoplastic, psychological, and traumatic events. Anatomical causes include pelvic floor muscular weakness, uterine retroversion, hymenal remnants, and pelvic organ prolapse. The etiology of this condition is complex, causing it to be often overlooked. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to conduct a qualitative exploratory study and provide a comprehensive description of the knowledge and attitudes held by gynecologists in Kazakhstan on the medical validity, diagnosis, and treatment of dyspareunia. DESIGN: This is an exploratory-descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with 10 physicians. They were identified as obstetrics and gynecology specialists, gynecologic oncologists, and outpatient gynecologists. The average number of years spent practicing their specialty is 15.7, with the shortest being 4 years and the longest being 35 years. All the participants are female. Braun and Clarke's six-stage, step-by-step methodology was used for the thematic analysis. RESULTS: Findings suggest that gynecologists in Kazakhstan have knowledge of the most common causes of dyspareunia, although they still often attribute women's distress to psychological rather than physical factors. It was found that due to stigma and mutual embarrassment open dialogue about sexual health was lacking between patients and physicians. In addition, gynecologists describe difficulties discussing symptoms and performing intimate examinations due to time constraints and a lack of privacy at state facilities. CONCLUSION: To knowledgeably diagnose and treat patients with dyspareunia, gynecologists recommend further training to acquire the requisite evidence-based knowledge and competencies.

An Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative Study of Kazakhstani Gynecologists' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward DyspareuniaBackground: Dyspareunia (pain during sex) is a common condition that causes physical and emotional distress in many women. Biological and psychological factors contribute to the onset of this condition, making diagnosis and management difficult for physicians. This painful condition can have a significant impact on women's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being, as well as their close relationships. Why was the study conducted? A thorough understanding of dyspareunia's causes, risk factors, and treatment techniques is required for effective management of the condition, but little research has been conducted in Kazakhstan on gynecologists' understanding of and attitudes toward dyspareunia. What did the researchers do? A qualitative study used online semi-structured interviews with gynecologists in Kazakhstan. What did the researchers find? The findings show that participating gynecologists are aware of the most common causes of dyspareunia, although they frequently attribute the condition to psychological rather than physical causes. It was found that due to stigma and mutual embarrassment, patients and participants did not engage in open discourse about sexual health. Furthermore, gynecologists have difficulty initiating discussions about women's sexual health and performing intimate examinations due to consultation time restrictions and a lack of privacy at state facilities. What do the researchers conclude? Additional training is recommended to gain the necessary evidence-based knowledge and competencies to accurately diagnose and treat patients with dyspareunia, and to address the lack of treatment protocols for dyspareunia in Kazakhstan, clinical guidelines published worldwide, including those issued by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, may be considered for use in Kazakhstan.

Lichen Sclerosus: A Survey of Diagnosis and Management Among Pediatric Dermatologists and Gynecologists.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic condition that warrants close follow-up due to the risk of scarring. The optimal long-term management of pediatric vulvar and perianal lichen sclerosus (PVPLS) is unknown. This study aimed to identify diagnostic, treatment, and maintenance regimens among pediatric dermatologists and pediatric/adolescent gynecologists, as well as assess provider confidence and desire for guidance on long-term PVPLS management. METHODS: A cross-sectional 35-question survey was administered through the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) between 7/13/2021 and 8/30/2021 to ascertain PVPLS diagnostic and management regimens. RESULTS: Most responders were attending-level pediatric/adolescent gynecologists (46%) and pediatric dermatologists (41%). Although 85% of participants felt completely or very confident in diagnosing PVPLS, the majority (86%) desired further management guidelines. While the initial treatment was similar among providers, maintenance regimens and follow-up varied considerably, with only 42% recommending lifelong monitoring despite potential persistence into adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: While initial treatment was similar among practitioners, there was variation by specialty in subsequent management and a lack of uniformity in long-term follow-up. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal management of PVPLS and to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding long-term follow-up.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):450-455.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8084.

Supporting OB-GYNs in Abortion-Restrictive States-A Playbook for Institutions.

This Viewpoint provides proposed institutional practices, such as medicolegal collaboration and providing materials and resources, to support obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) in abortion-restrictive states.

[Resolution of the national interdisciplinary council of experts "High-dose vitamin D (Devilam) in the practice of an obstetrician-gynecologist"].

On March 28, 2024, the Council of Experts "High-dose vitamin D (Devilam) in the practice of obstetrician-gynecologist, gynecologist and endocrinologist" was held in Moscow with the participation of leading experts gynecologists, endocrinologists and obstetricians-gynecologists, during which new possibilities for the use of high-dose vitamin D in patients of various ages who need correction of existing vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency.

Actions speak louder than words; pediatricians, gynecologists, nurses, and other mothers' perspectives on the human papillomavirus vaccine: an Istanbul multicenter study.

Introduction: Gynecologists and pediatricians have an essential duty to prevent cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the compliance of gynecologists (n = 22) and pediatricians (n = 49) with nurse/midwife (n = 66) and non-medical moms (n = 120) with regards to cervical cancer precautions. Methods: A questionnaire was used to gather data on their demographics, personal vaccination and screening practices, children's immunization status, and awareness of cervical cancer prevention. Results: The findings demonstrated that gynecologists and pediatricians were better than others at understanding the risk factors and prevention of cervical cancer. It was noted that compared to other groups, physician mothers and their offspring had higher vaccination rates (n = 13, 18.3%; n = 10, 29.4%, respectively). Medical professionals typically provided thorough and accurate answers to informational questions. More frequent Pap smear tests were performed by gynecologists. It was noted that mothers who worked as pediatricians and nurses/midwives neglected their own screening needs. Discussion: This questionnaire survey sought to ascertain Istanbul's health professionals' present opinions regarding HPV vaccination. Healthcare professionals should be the first to receive information on HPV vaccination and cervical cancer incidence reduction. The public could then readily use them as an example.

Attitudes and practice patterns of Finnish obstetrician-gynecologists regarding patients' sexual problems.

OBJECTIVE: Female sexual problems are common but are not routinely assessed in obstetrician-gynecologist appointments. Therefore, we evaluated obstetrician-gynecologists' attitudes and practice patterns regarding their patients' sexual problems. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based questionnaire was used to collect information from each respondent on gender, age, education, occupational status, and the total number of patients treated per day and sexual issues dealt with per day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This study covered three fields of interest: 1) attitudes toward sexual problems, 2) practice patterns in sexual history-taking, and 3) practice patterns in the treatment of sexual problems. RESULTS: Of the 328 respondents, 299 provided eligible responses (specialists, 83 %, n = 249; residents, 17 %, n = 50). Almost all obstetrician-gynecologists (95 %) considered treating sexual problems as an important health care practice, but only 45 % and 53 % asked about sexual problems and sexual life satisfaction during general medical history-taking, respectively. Most obstetrician-gynecologists (86 %) used open conversation to assess sexual history. Half (52 %) of them reported that diagnosing female sexual problems is difficult, with the female obstetrician-gynecologists (54 %) more likely to report difficulty than the male obstetrician-gynecologists (29 %). Of the obstetrician-gynecologists, 15 % prescribed medications, whereas 58 % prescribed other treatments. A third (34 %) received distinct instructions from their organization for referring patients to continued care. CONCLUSIONS: Although almost all obstetrician-gynecologists reported that treating sexual problems is an important health care issue, fewer than half routinely inquired about sexual problems. The practice patterns regarding sexual problems were disorganized. Our results show a need for additional clinical practice guidelines and education in sexual medicine.

Guideline for gynecological practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2023 edition.

Twelve years after the first edition of The Guideline for Gynecological Practice, which was jointly edited by The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the 5th Revised Edition was published in 2023. The 2023 Guidelines includes 5 additional clinical questions (CQs), which brings the total to 103 CQ (12 on infectious disease, 30 on oncology and benign tumors, 29 on endocrinology and infertility and 32 on healthcare for women). Currently, a consensus has been reached on the Guidelines, and therefore, the objective of this report is to present the general policies regarding diagnostic and treatment methods used in standard gynecological outpatient care that are considered appropriate. At the end of each answer, the corresponding Recommendation Level (A, B, C) is indicated.

Evaluación del conocimiento y manejo de la violencia basada en género desde la perspectiva de los ginecotocólogos y posgrados en la práctica clínica en Uruguay / Evaluation of knowledge and management of gender-based violence from the perspective of gynecologists and postgraduates in clinical practice in Uruguay / Avaliação do conhecimento e do gerenciamento da violência baseada em gênero sob a perspectiva de ginecologistas e pós-graduandos na prática clínica no Uruguai

Introducción: la violencia basada en género (VBG) es un grave problema de salud con cifras alarmantes. Las mujeres víctimas de VBG acuden a los centros de salud para ser atendidas por este y otros motivos, siendo en muchos casos el primer y único contacto de las mujeres con el sistema sanitario. El objetivo de este estudio es investigar acerca del nivel de formación, conocimientos, actuación y percepciones sobre la atención por parte de los ginecotocólogos y posgrados de Ginecotocología en casos de VBG en la práctica clínica diaria en nuestro medio. Método: se realizó un estudio descriptivo observacional de corte transversal de una muestra por conveniencia. Se encuestaron 143 profesionales, comprendiendo ginecotocólogos y posgrados de Ginecotocología en el período comprendido entre el 1 y el 30 de septiembre de 2019. Resultados: 9 de cada 10 de los profesionales refirieron no realizar o realizar pocas preguntas sobre VBG en la práctica clínica, y 80% no tiene claro sobre cuál es su rol en la detección de una víctima de VBG, siendo profesionales que asisten a un promedio de 20 a 60 mujeres semanalmente. Un tercio de los encuestados manifestaron tener menos de una hora de formación académica en VBG. Conclusión: existe escasa formación académica en esta temática. Se mostró que entender el papel del profesional en la detección de casos de VBG y la capacidad para responder apropiadamente están íntimamente relacionados con la capacidad de identificar la VBG en la práctica clínica diaria.

Introduction: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a serious health problem that accounts for alarming figures. Women victims of GBV come to health centers to be treated for this and other reasons, in many cases being this the first and only contact they have with the health system. The objective of this study is to find out the level of training, knowledge, actions, and perceptions regarding care by gynecologists and gynecology postgraduates in cases of gender-based violence seen during daily clinical practice in our setting. Method: A descriptive observational study was conducted, with a cross-sectional design and convenience sample. A total of 143 professionals were surveyed, including gynecologists and gynecology postgraduates, between September 1st and September 30th, 2019. Results: Nine out of ten professionals reported not asking or asking few questions about GBV in their clinical practice, and 80% were unclear about their role in detecting GBV victims, despite assisting an average of 20 to 60 women weekly. One-third of respondents reported having less than an hour of academic training in GBV. Conclusion: There is limited academic training in this area. The study showed that understanding the professionals' role in detecting GBV cases and their ability to respond appropriately to it are closely related to the ability to identify GBV in daily clinical practice.

Introdução: a violência baseada em gênero (VBG) é um grave problema de saúde com números alarmantes. As mulheres vítimas de VBG procuram os centros de saúde para tratamento por esse e outros motivos e, em muitos casos, esse é o primeiro e único contato que as mulheres têm com o sistema de saúde. O objetivo deste estudo é pesquisar o nível de formação, conhecimento, desempenho e percepções do atendimento por tocoginecologistas e pós-graduandos em Tocoginecologia nos casos de VBG na prática clínica diária. Métodos: foi realizado um estudo observacional descritivo de corte transversal com uma amostra de conveniência. Foram incluídos 143 profissionais, incluindo tocoginecologistas e pós-graduandos em Tocoginecologia no período entre 1º e 30 de setembro de 2019. Resultados: 9 em cada 10 profissionais relataram não fazer nenhuma ou poucas perguntas sobre a VBG na prática clínica, e 80% não tinham clareza sobre seu papel na identificação de uma vítima de VBG em sua prática, sendo profissionais que atendem uma média de 20 a 60 mulheres por semana. Um terço dos entrevistados relatou ter menos de uma hora de formação acadêmica em VBG. Conclusão: Há pouca formação acadêmica nessa área. A compreensão do papel do profissional na detecção de casos de VBG e a capacidade de responder adequadamente estão intimamente relacionadas à capacidade de identificar VBG na prática clínica diária.

French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) recommendations for clinical practice: Place of breast self-examination in screening strategies.

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume. In this context, it is useful to assess whether the regular practice of formal breast self-examination (BSE) as opposed to breast awareness has an impact on the number of cancers diagnosed, their stage, the treatments used and mortality. DESIGN: The Commission of Senology (CS) of the Collège National de Gynécologie et Obstétrique Français (CNGOF) respected and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: The CS studied 16 questions individualizing four groups of women (general population, women aged over 75, high-risk women, and women previously treated for breast cancer). For each situation, it was determined whether the practice of BSE versus abstention from this examination led to detection of more breast cancers and/or recurrences and/or reduced treatment and/or increased survival. RESULTS: BSE should not be recommended for women in the general population, who otherwise benefit from clinical breast examination by practitioners from the age of 25, and from organized screening from 50 to 74 (strong recommendation). In the absence of data on the benefits of BSE in patients aged over 75, for those at high risk and those previously treated for breast cancer, the CS was unable to issue recommendations. Thus, if women in these categories wish to undergo BSE, information on the benefits and risks observed in the general population must be given, notably that BSE is associated with a higher number of referrals, biopsies, and a reduced quality of life.

[First-line management of infertile couple. Guidelines for clinical practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2022]. / Prise en charge de première intention du couple infertile : mise à jour des RPC 2010 du CNGOF.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2010 CNGOF clinical practice guidelines for the first-line management of infertile couples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five major themes (first-line assessment of the infertile woman, first-line assessment of the infertile man, prevention of exposure to environmental factors, initial management using ovulation induction regimens, first-line reproductive surgery) were identified, enabling 28 questions to be formulated using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format. Each question was addressed by a working group that had carried out a systematic review of the literature since 2010, and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) methodology to assess the quality of the scientific data on which the recommendations were based. These recommendations were then validated during a national review by 40 national experts. RESULTS: The fertility work-up is recommended to be prescribed according to the woman's age: after one year of infertility before the age of 35 and after 6months after the age of 35. A couple's initial infertility work-up includes a single 3D ultrasound scan with antral follicle count, assessment of tubal permeability by hysterography or HyFOSy, anti-Mullerian hormone assay prior to assisted reproduction, and vaginal swabbing for vaginosis. If the 3D ultrasound is normal, hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy are not recommended as first-line procedures. Chlamydia trachomatis serology does not have the necessary performance to predict tubal patency. Post-coital testing is no longer recommended. In men, spermogram, spermocytogram and spermoculture are recommended as first-line tests. If the spermogram is normal, it is not recommended to check the spermogram. If the spermogram is abnormal, an examination by an andrologist, an ultrasound scan of the testicles and hormonal test are recommended. Based on the data in the literature, we are unable to recommend a BMI threshold for women that would contraindicate medical management of infertility. A well-balanced Mediterranean-style diet, physical activity and the cessation of smoking and cannabis are recommended for infertile couples. For fertility concern, it is recommended to limit alcohol consumption to less than 5 glasses a week. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormalities, ovulation induction is not recommended for normo-ovulatory women. If intrauterine insemination is indicated based on an abnormal infertility work-up, gonadotropin stimulation and ovulation monitoring are recommended to avoid multiple pregnancies. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormality, laparoscopy is probably recommended before the age of 30 to increase natural pregnancy rates. In the case of hydrosalpinx, surgical management is recommended prior to ART, with either salpingotomy or salpingectomy depending on the tubal score. It is recommended to operate on polyps>10mm, myomas 0, 1, 2 and synechiae prior to ART. The data in the literature do not allow us to systematically recommend asymptomatic uterine septa and isthmoceles as first-line surgery. CONCLUSION: Based on strong agreement between experts, we have been able to formulate updated recommendations in 28 areas concerning the initial management of infertile couples.