Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21.164
Filtrar
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 404, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the elderly is limited, and results are controversial. There are also few reports from China. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study design to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated visits among elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) across four influenza seasons in Ningbo, China, from 2018 to 19 to 2021-22. Influenza-positive cases and negative controls were randomly matched in a 1:1 ratio according to age, sex, hospital, and date of influenza testing. We used logistic regression models to compare vaccination odds ratios (ORs) in cases to controls. We calculated the VE as [100% × (1-adjusted OR)] and calculated the 95% confidence interval (CI) around the estimate. RESULTS: A total of 30,630 elderly patients tested for influenza with virus nucleic acid or antigen during the study period. After exclusions, we included 1 825 influenza-positive cases and 1 825 influenza-negative controls. Overall, the adjusted VE for influenza-related visits was 63.5% (95% CI, 56.3-69.5%), but varied by season. Influenza VE was 59.8% (95% CI, 51.5-66.7%) for influenza A and 89.6% (95% CI, 77.1-95.3%) for influenza B. The VE for ages 60-69 and 70-79 was 65.2% (95% CI, 55.4-72.9%) and 69.8% (95% CI, 58.7-77.9%), respectively, but only 45.4% (95% CI, 6.2-68.2%) for ages 80 and over. CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine has shown good protection in the elderly in China. However, protection may not be satisfactory in people aged 80 years and older.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pueblos del Este de Asia
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 609-617, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728646

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Influenza is a serious underestimated viral infection in Pakistan and influenza vaccination and vaccination awareness are low. The current work aimed to develop consensus on influenza epidemiology, prevention, vaccination, and awareness in Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was conducted to develop recommendations on influenza vaccines in Pakistan. Experts' feedback was incorporated using the modified Delphi method. A three-step process was used, with 18 experts from different specialties from Pakistan who participated in voting rounds to achieve a minimum 75% agreement level. RESULTS: Pakistan has a low-immunization-rate and is susceptible to serious influenza outbreaks and influenza-related complications. Influenza circulates year-round in Pakistan but peaks during January and February. The subtype A/H1N1 is predominant. The experts urged vaccination in all individuals ≥ 6 months of age and with no contraindications. They highlighted special considerations for those with comorbidities and specific conditions. The experts agreed that the inactivated influenza vaccine is safe and efficient in pregnant women, immunocompromised, and comorbid respiratory and cardiovascular patients. Finally, the experts recommended conducting promotional and educational programs to raise awareness on influenza and vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first regional consensus on influenza and influenza vaccination in Pakistan with experts' recommendations to increase influenza vaccination and decrease influenza cases and its associated detrimental effects.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Humanos , Pakistán/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Femenino
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2350090, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738691

RESUMEN

During the initial half-year of their existence, infants cannot receive the influenza vaccine, yet they face the greatest susceptibility to severe influenza complications. In this study, we seek to determine whether influenza vaccination of maternal and household contacts is associated with a reduced risk of influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) in infants. This work was prospectively conducted during the influenza season. A total of 206 infants were included in this study. The percentage of infants with only the mother vaccinated is 12.6% (n:26), and the percent of infants with all household contacts vaccinated is 16% (n:33). Among the infants with only the mother vaccinated, the effectiveness of influenza vaccine is estimated as 35.3% for ILI and 41.3% for SARI. Among infants with all household contacts vaccinated, the effectiveness is estimated as 48.9% for ILI and 76.9% for SARI. Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, all-household vaccination is a protective factor against SARI (OR: 0.07 95% CI [0.01-0.56]), household size (OR: 1.75, 95% CI [1.24-2.48]) and presence of secondhand smoke (OR: 2.2, 95% CI [1.12-4.45]) significant risk factors for SARI in infants. The mother alone being vaccinated is not a statistically significant protective factor against ILI (OR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.19-1.18]) or SARI (OR: 0.3, 95% CI [0.11-1.21]). Along with the obtained results and analysis, this study provides clear evidence that influenza vaccination of all household contacts of infants aged 0-6 months is significantly associated with protecting infants from both ILI and SARI.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Femenino , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación/métodos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Composición Familiar , Adulto , Madres , Recién Nacido
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10845, 2024 05 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736012

RESUMEN

With growing recognition of the importance of community engagement in addressing public health challenges, its role in promoting healthy behaviors and preventing infectious diseases has gained attention. However, vaccination coverage remains a significant concern in many developing countries. While previous studies have linked community engagement to positive health outcomes, there is a gap in understanding its influence on individual vaccination choices, particularly in the context of developing countries. Utilizing data from the 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this study examines the impact of community engagement on COVID-19 and flu vaccination uptake among 7281 individuals. Community engagement, measured by community vaccination notifications, serves as the key independent variable. The study employs Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methods to analyze the relationship between community engagement and vaccination behavior. The analysis reveals a positive association between community engagement and vaccination rates. Specifically, individuals receiving notifications were more likely to get the COVID-19 vaccine compared to non-recipients (vaccination rates: 100% vs. 53.3%), and flu vaccination rates were also significantly higher among those notified (2.7% vs. 1.9%). Mechanism analysis suggests that individuals receiving community notifications are more aware of the benefits of vaccination, leading to higher vaccination rates among this group. This study underscores the effectiveness of community engagement strategies in promoting positive vaccination behavior among individuals in China. By enhancing awareness and trust in immunization, community engagement initiatives play a crucial role in shaping health behaviors and improving vaccination uptake. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating community engagement approaches into public health interventions to address vaccination challenges.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Participación de la Comunidad , Vacunación , Humanos , China , Femenino , Masculino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 62, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730508

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Seasonal influenza causes annual school breaks and student absenteeism in Hong Kong schools and kindergartens. This proposal aims to conduct a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of a school-based influenza vaccination (SIV) programme on absenteeism and outbreaks at schools in Hong Kong. METHODS: The study will compare schools that implemented the SIV programme with schools that did not. The data will be sourced from school records, encompassing absenteeism records, outbreak reports, and vaccination rates. We will recruit 1000 students from 381 schools and kindergartens in 18 districts of Hong Kong starting June 2024. The primary outcome measures will include absenteeism rates due to influenza and school influenza outbreaks. Secondary outcomes will consist of vaccination coverage rates and the impact of the SIV programme on hospitalisations due to influenza-like illness. A t-test will be conducted to compare the outcomes between schools with and without the SIV programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The school completed signing the participants' informed consent form before reporting the data to us. Our study has been approved by the Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster IRB Committee (IRB No: UW 17-111) and was a subtopic of the research "The estimated age-group specific influenza vaccine coverage rates in Hong Kong and the impact of the school outreach vaccination program". TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study will be retrospectively registered.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Brotes de Enfermedades , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Instituciones Académicas , Humanos , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Adolescente , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2348124, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714332

RESUMEN

South Korea's National Immunization Program administers the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) to manage seasonal influenza, with a particular focus on the elderly. After reviewing the safety and immune response triggered by the adjuvanted QIV (aQIV) in individuals aged 65 and older, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in Korea approved its use. However, the extensive impact of aQIV on public health is yet to be fully understood. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of replacing QIV with aQIV in South Korean adults aged 65 years and older. A dynamic transmission model, calibrated with national influenza data, was applied to compare the influence of aQIV and QIV on older adults and the broader population throughout a single influenza season. This study considered both the direct and indirect effects of vaccination on the elderly. We derived the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs incurred, validated through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 5,000 simulations. Findings suggest that transitioning to aQIV from QIV in the elderly would be cost-effective, particularly if aQIV's efficacy reaches or exceeds 56.1%. With an ICER of $29,267/QALY, considerably lower than the $34,998/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, aQIV presents as a cost-effective option. Thus, implementing aQIV with at least 56.1% efficacy is beneficial from both financial and public health perspectives in mitigating seasonal influenza in South Korea.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , República de Corea , Anciano , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/economía , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2345505, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724010

RESUMEN

The potential impact of combined COVID-19 and influenza vaccination on long COVID remains uncertain. In the present cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the plausible association between them in middle-aged and older Europeans based on the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). A total of 1910 participants were recruited in the analyses. The study outcome was long COVID. Participants were divided into 4 groups through the self-reported status of COVID-19 and influenza vaccination. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. 1397 participants experienced long COVID. After multivariable adjustment, those vaccinated with neither COVID-19 nor influenza vaccine had higher risk of long COVID (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.35) compared to those vaccinated with both vaccines. Furthermore, adding the 4 statuses of COVID-19 vaccination/influenza vaccination to conventional risk model improved risk reclassification for long COVID (continuous net reclassification improvement was 16.26% [p = .003], and integrated discrimination improvement was 0.51% [p = .005]). No heterogeneity was found in the subgroup analyses (all p-interaction ≥0.05). Our study might provide a strategy for people aged 50 and over to reduce the occurrence of long COVID, that is, to combine the use of the COVID-19 vaccine and influenza vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Anciano , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pueblo Europeo
9.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13284, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773753

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We report 2023/2024 season interim influenza vaccine effectiveness for three studies, namely, primary care in Great Britain, hospital settings in Scotland and hospital settings in England. METHODS: A test negative design was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Estimated vaccine effectiveness against all influenzas ranged from 63% (95% confidence interval 46 to 75%) to 65% (41 to 79%) among children aged 2-17, from 36% (20 to 49%) to 55% (43 to 65%) among adults 18-64 and from 40% (29 to 50%) to 55% (32 to 70%) among adults aged 65 and over. CONCLUSIONS: During a period of co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) in the United Kingdom, evidence for effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in both children and adults was found.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Atención Primaria de Salud , Atención Secundaria de Salud , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Reino Unido , Anciano , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Masculino , Femenino , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Estaciones del Año , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2346966, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741240

RESUMEN

This research examines the low rate of co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines among seniors aged 65 and older in Korea, despite recommendations from authorities and academia worldwide. The study aimed to understand the influence of general characteristics and health beliefs on the vaccination choices of seniors, who were categorized into four groups based on their vaccination status: influenza only, COVID-19 only, both, or neither. A total of 400 participants, aged 65 and above, were selected through proportional stratified random sampling from five major Korean regions for a survey conducted between November 24th and December 15th, 2023. The results indicated no significant differences in general characteristics across these groups. However, regarding the health beliefs showed significant differences in perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy between the influenza-only and co-administration groups. Higher levels of perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy were associated with choosing co-administration. Contrary to previous studies focusing on safety concerns as a primary factor in vaccine hesitancy, this study highlights the role of individual health-related beliefs, particularly perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy, as critical in influencing the decision for co-administration among the elderly in Korea.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Anciano , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , República de Corea , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Autoeficacia , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Toma de Decisiones
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2352916, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744298

RESUMEN

Healthcare providers (HCPs) are recommended for priority influenza vaccination due to their high risk of contracting influenza. HCPs greatly aid in targeted population immunization campaigns. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence HCPs' decisions to get vaccinated and to recommend influenza vaccination is essential. However, there currently needs to be more evidence on this topic in China. Qualitative interviews using a semi-structured interview method were conducted with 180 HCPs from urban community hospitals and town hospitals in four cities in Shandong Province during August 2023. The interview content was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify the variables impacting the vaccination and recommendation practices of HCPs, as well as their suggestions for improving vaccination services. The results will help support the future development of precise intervention measures as well as focused education and training.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Investigación Cualitativa , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , China , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Femenino , Masculino , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Programas de Inmunización , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología
12.
Age Ageing ; 53(Supplement_2): ii70-ii79, 2024 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745493

RESUMEN

This systematic review evaluated the impact of oral probiotics on the immune response to vaccination in older people. A literature search was performed in three electronic databases up to January 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in older people (age ≥ 60 years) investigating oral probiotics and vaccine response outcomes were included. Characteristics and outcome data of the included studies were extracted and analysed and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials. Ten RCTs involving 1,560 participants, reported in 9 papers, were included. Nine studies involved the seasonal influenza vaccine and one a COVID-19 vaccine. All studies used lactobacilli, some in combination with bifidobacteria. Studies reported outcomes including anti-vaccine antibody titres or concentrations, seroconversion and seroprotection. When comparing antibody titres, seroprotection rate and seroconversion rate between probiotic and placebo groups expressed as a response ratio, the weighted mean values were 1.29, 1.16 and 2.00, respectively. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics increase seroconversion rates to all three strains of the seasonal influenza vaccine: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.74 (1.31, 5.70; P = 0.007) for the H1N1 strain; 1.90 (1.04, 3.44; P = 0.04) for the H3N2 strain; 1.72 (1.05, 2.80; P = 0.03) for the B strain. There was a low level of heterogeneity in these findings. Several studies were at high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Lactobacilli may improve the vaccine response, but further research is needed to be more certain of this.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Probióticos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Administración Oral , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249531, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696165

RESUMEN

Importance: Pregnancy represents a window of opportunity for vaccination due to established maternal and fetal benefits of vaccination. Little is known about receipt of routinely recommended vaccines in pregnancy, specifically tetanus, diphtheria, plus acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza, among pregnant people living with HIV (PLHIV). Objective: To estimate prevalence of vaccination receipt among pregnant people with HIV (PLHIV) and identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with vaccination. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included women participating in Women's Health Study (WHS) of the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) Study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. The network has been enrolling pregnant PLHIV at 22 US sites since 2007. Participants for this study enrolled between December 2017 and July 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022. Exposure: Data on vaccination in pregnancy were collected through medical record abstraction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vaccination receipt was defined as Tdap vaccination received at less than 36 weeks' gestation and influenza vaccination at any gestational age, based on current guidelines. Log-binomial and modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were fit to identify factors associated with successful receipt of (1) Tdap, (2) influenza, and (3) both vaccinations. Results: A total of 310 pregnancies among 278 people participating in the WHS were included (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [6.1] years; 220 [71%] Black, 77 [25%] Hispanic, and 77 [25%] race and ethnicity other than Black; 64 [21%] with perinatally acquired HIV). Less than one-third of pregnancies were vaccinated as recommended (Tdap, 32.6% [95% CI, 27.4%-38.1%]; influenza, 31.6% [95% CI, 26.5%-37.1%]; both, 22.6% [95% CI, 18.0%-27.6%]). People living with perinatally acquired HIV, those who did not identify as Black, or those who were multiparous had adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) less than 1, while older PLHIV had aRRs greater than 1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (perinatally acquired HIV: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; race other than Black: aRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.08; multiparous: aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00; age 24-29 years: aRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.92-4.48). Conclusions and Relevance: In this diverse, multicenter cohort of pregnant PLHIV, receipt of recommended vaccinations was low. Identifying and addressing barriers to vaccination receipt is urgently needed for pregnant people with HIV.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Infecciones por VIH , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Vacunación , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
14.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3404-3409, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704255

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Globally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and illness. Vaccine-preventable infections may increase acute coronary vascular disease events and the risk of complications. Low vaccine coverage has been reported among adults at high risk of complications from vaccine-preventable infections. There is a gap in research evidence around determinants of uptake of vaccines among adults with CVD. This study examined the uptake of influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccines and the determinants of uptake of the vaccines among cardiac patients. METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among hospitalised cardiac patients through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate self-reported uptake of influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccines. Univariate and multivariate analyses of participants' social demographic and clinical characteristics were conducted to identify factors for receiving influenza vaccine. RESULTS: Low vaccination rates among 104 participants were found for influenza (45.2%), pneumococcal (13.5%) and zoster (5.8%) vaccines. The most common reason for not receiving influenza vaccine was concern about side effects. Lack of awareness about the pneumococcal and zoster vaccines was the main reason for the poor uptake of these vaccines. Australia-born participants were more likely to receive influenza vaccine than overseas-born participants. Working-age participants and, interestingly, people living with a current smoker were less likely to receive influenza vaccine. CONCLUSION: Influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccine uptake among cardiac patients was low. Encouraging physician recommendations for vaccination for cardiac patients under 65 years of age and addressing vaccination challenges among people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and pharmacy, workplace, and hospital vaccination may help increase vaccination uptake among cardiac patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años
15.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3486-3492, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While safety of influenza vaccines is well-established, some studies have suggested potential associations between influenza vaccines and certain adverse events (AEs). This study examined the safety of the 2022-2023 influenza vaccines among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. METHODS: A self-controlled case series compared incidence rates of anaphylaxis, encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), and transverse myelitis following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations (i.e., any, high-dose or adjuvanted) in risk and control intervals among Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years. We used conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for event-dependent observation time and seasonality. Analyses also accounted for uncertainty from outcome misclassification where feasible. For AEs with any statistically significant associations, we stratified results by concomitant vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 12.7 million vaccine recipients, we observed 76 anaphylaxis, 276 encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, 134 GBS and 75 transverse myelitis cases. Only rates of anaphylaxis were elevated in risk compared to control intervals. With all adjustments, an elevated, but non-statistically significant, anaphylaxis rate was observed following any (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 0.96-6.03), high-dose (IRR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.67-7.91), and adjuvanted (IRR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.71-15.08) influenza vaccination; anaphylaxis IRRs were 2.54 (95% CI: 0.49-13.05) and 1.64 (95% CI: 0.38-7.05) for persons with and without concomitant vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, GBS, or transverse myelitis were not elevated following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. There was an increased rate of anaphylaxis following influenza vaccination that may have been influenced by concomitant vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Incidencia , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Mielitis Transversa/epidemiología , Mielitis Transversa/etiología , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos
16.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1370564, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711520

RESUMEN

There are considerable avenues through which currently licensed influenza vaccines could be optimized. We tested influenza vaccination in a mouse model with two adjuvants: Sendai virus-derived defective interfering (SDI) RNA, a RIG-I agonist; and an amphiphilic imidazoquinoline (IMDQ-PEG-Chol), a TLR7/8 agonist. The negatively charged SDI RNA was formulated into lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) facilitating direct delivery of SDI RNA to the cytosol, where RIG-I sensing induces inflammatory and type I interferon responses. We previously tested SDI RNA and IMDQ-PEG-Chol as standalone and combination adjuvants for influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Here, we tested two different ionizable lipids, K-Ac7-Dsa and S-Ac7-Dog, for LNP formulations. The LNPs were incorporated with SDI RNA to determine its potential as a combination adjuvant with IMDQ-PEG-Chol by evaluating the host immune response to vaccination and infection in immunized BALB/c mice. Adjuvanticity of IMDQ-PEG-Chol with and without empty or SDI-loaded LNPs was validated with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV), showing robust induction of antibody titers and T-cell responses. Depending on the adjuvant combination and LNP formulation, humoral and cellular vaccine responses could be tailored towards type 1 or type 2 host responses with specific cytokine profiles that correlated with the protective responses to viral infection. The extent of protection conferred by different vaccine/LNP/adjuvant combinations was tested by challenging mice with a vaccine-matched strain of influenza A virus A/Singapore/gp1908/2015 IVR-180 (H1N1). Groups that received either LNP formulated with SDI or IMDQ-PEG-Chol, or both, showed very low levels of viral replication in their lungs at 5 days post-infection (DPI). These studies provide evidence that the combination of vaccines with LNPs and/or adjuvants promote antigen-specific cellular responses that can contribute to protection upon infection. Interestingly, we observed differences in humoral and cellular responses to vaccination between different groups receiving K-Ac7-Dsa or S-Ac7-Dog lipids in LNP formulations. The differences were also reflected in inflammatory responses in lungs of vaccinated animals to infection, depending on LNP formulations. Therefore, this study suggests that the composition of the LNPs, particularly the ionizable lipid, plays an important role in inducing inflammatory responses in vivo, which is important for vaccine safety and to prevent adverse effects upon viral exposure.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Liposomas , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Nanopartículas , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae , Animales , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/inmunología , Femenino , Lípidos , Vacunación/métodos , Adyuvantes de Vacunas , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Virus Sendai/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología
17.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13302, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The transmission of influenza virus in households, especially by children, is a major route of infection. Prior studies suggest that timely antiviral treatment of ill cases may reduce infection in household contacts. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of oseltamivir (OTV) and baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment of index cases on the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza within household. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was done in BLOCKSTONE trial-a placebo-controlled, double-blinded post-exposure prophylaxis of BXM. Data were derived from the laboratory-confirmed index cases' household contacts who received placebo in the trial and also from household members who did not participate in the trial but completed illness questionnaires. To assess the SAR of household members, multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, vaccination status, and household size were performed and compared between contacts of index cases treated with BXM or OTV. RESULTS: In total, 185 index cases (116 treated with BXM and 69 treated with OTV) and 410 household contacts (201 from trial, 209 by questionnaire) were included. The Poisson regression modeling showed that the SAR in household contacts of index cases treated with BXM and OTV was 10.8% and 18.5%, respectively; the adjusted relative reduction in SAR was 41.8% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%-65.7%, p = 0.0456) greater with BXM than OTV. Similar reductions were found in contacts from the trial and those included by questionnaire. CONCLUSION: BXM treatment of index cases appeared to result in a greater reduction in secondary household transmission than OTV treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Dibenzotiepinas , Composición Familiar , Gripe Humana , Morfolinas , Oseltamivir , Profilaxis Posexposición , Piridonas , Triazinas , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Triazinas/uso terapéutico , Dibenzotiepinas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Adolescente , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Preescolar , Morfolinas/uso terapéutico , Tiepinas/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Lactante , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Oxazinas/uso terapéutico
18.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13754, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Under the prevention and control measures of COVID-19, the epidemiological situation of respiratory pathogens is not well known. Understanding the patterns of respiratory pathogens epidemiology under the prevention and control measures of COVID-19 is important to guide resource allocation for existing and future treatment and prevention strategies. METHODS: In total, 659 fever outpatients nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at fever illness onset during June in 2022 at the First Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Swabs were tested by real-time fluorescent single-tube multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 12 respiratory pathogens. Moreover, 108 of the 659 swabs were tested for influenza virus antigen. RESULTS: At least one pathogen was detected in 477 (72.38%) of 659 fever outpatients with multiple pathogens identified in 25 (3.79%). The highest multiple infectious pattern is parainfluenza virus in combination with influenza (five cases). Influenza A virus (IFA), human rhinovirus (HRV), and parainfluenza virus are the three leading virus pathogens with proportions of 64.64%, 5.01%, and 2.88%. School-age children and adult groups have the highest pathogens positivity rate of 81.28% and 83.87%. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of adolescents and adults has respiratory pathogens detected during fever illnesses during June in 2022 under the prevention and control of COVID-19. These data indicate that diagnosis, prevention, and control of respiratory tract infection should be paid attention under the prevention and control of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/virología , China/epidemiología , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Anciano , Lactante , Nasofaringe/virología
19.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1222, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza epidemics have a substantial public health and economic burden, which can be alleviated through vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 75% vaccination coverage rate (VCR) in: older adults (aged ≥ 65 years), individuals with chronic conditions, pregnant women, children aged 6-24 months and healthcare workers. However, no European country achieves this target in all risk groups. In this study, potential public health and economic benefits achieved by reaching 75% influenza VCR was estimated in risk groups across four European countries: France, Italy, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: A static epidemiological model was used to estimate the averted public health and economic burden of increasing the 2021/2022 season VCR to 75%, using the efficacy data of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine. For each country and risk group, the most recent data on population size, VCR, pre-pandemic influenza epidemiology, direct medical costs and absenteeism were identified through a systematic literature review, supplemented by manual searching. Outcomes were: averted influenza cases, general practitioner (GP) visits, hospitalisations, case fatalities, number of days of work lost, direct medical costs and absenteeism-related costs. RESULTS: As of the 2021/2022 season, the UK achieved the highest weighted VCR across risk groups (65%), followed by Spain (47%), France (44%) and Italy (44%). Based on modelling, the 2021/2022 VCR prevented an estimated 1.9 million influenza cases, avoiding 375,200 GP visits, 73,200 hospitalisations and 38,400 deaths. To achieve the WHO 75% VCR target, an additional 24 million at-risk individuals would need to be vaccinated, most of which being older adults and patients with chronic conditions. It was estimated that this could avoid a further 918,200 influenza cases, 332,000 GP visits, 16,300 hospitalisations and 6,300 deaths across the four countries, with older adults accounting for 52% of hospitalisations and 80% of deaths. An additional €84 million in direct medical costs and €79 million in absenteeism costs would be saved in total, with most economic benefits delivered in France. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults represent most vaccine-preventable influenza cases and deaths, followed by individuals with chronic conditions. Health authorities should prioritise vaccinating these populations for maximum public health and economic benefits.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Salud Pública , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/economía , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Anciano , Femenino , Salud Pública/economía , Adulto , Reino Unido/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preescolar , Francia/epidemiología , Masculino , Estaciones del Año , Adolescente , Lactante , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Niño , Embarazo , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/economía
20.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 71(3): 469-479, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754936

RESUMEN

This article examines lessons learned from previous pandemics, including the 2009 H1N1 influenza and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pediatric providers have a unique and important role and strategies to improve collaboration and communication between public health and pediatric providers are essential during public health emergencies. A robust network of communication channels, effective public health messaging, and pediatric-focused disease related, and program outcome data are key to supporting a coordinated response to future pandemics. Critical issues include real-time communication with and engagement of pediatric providers as well as optimizing best evidence approaches for pediatric care while considering the distinct challenges facing children and their families.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Salud Infantil , Pandemias , Pediatría , Salud Pública , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Pandemias/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA