RESUMEN
Objectives: The present study aimed to assess influenza vaccine hesitancy and vaccine literacy levels among youth and adults in China, as well as the association between them. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in Mainland China. Participants' total vaccine literacy and three sub-dimension vaccine literacy (knowledge literacy, competence literacy, and decision-making literacy) were assessed by a validated vaccine literacy scale. Having received influenza vaccination in the past three years or intending to accept it in next influenza season indicates less influenza vaccine hesitancy. Results: Among 997 participants, a sub-optimal vaccine literacy was observed, with a mean score of 66.83 ± 10.27. Regression models 1-4 revealed that participants with middle (aOR: 1.431, P=0.039, 95% CI: 1.018~2.010) or high (aOR: 1.651, P=0.006, 95% CI: 1.157~2.354) total vaccine literacy, as well as those with high competence literacy (aOR: 1.533, P=0.017, 95% CI: 1.079~2.180), or high decision-making literacy (aOR: 1.822, P=0.001, 95% CI: 1.261~2.632) were more likely to have been vaccinated against influenza at least once in past three years. However, those with a high knowledge literacy were associated with a lower influenza vaccine rate (aOR: 0.676, P=0.046, 95% CI: 0.460~0.994). Regression models 5-8 revealed that participants with middle (aOR: 1.661, P=0.008, 95% CI: 1.142~2.414) or high total vaccine literacy (aOR: 2.645, P=0.000, 95% CI: 1.774~3.942), as well as those with middle (aOR: 1.703, P=0.005, 95% CI: 1.177~2.464) or high competence literacy (aOR: 2.346, P=0.000, 95% CI: 1.159~3.461), or high decision-making literacy (aOR: 2.294, P=0.000, 95% CI: 1.531~3.436) were more likely to express the willingness to receive the influenza vaccine in the next influenza season. Conclusion: The participants' influenza vaccine hesitancy was negatively associated with their total vaccine literacy levels and two of the three sub-dimensions: competence literacy and decision-making literacy. Knowledge literacy suggested a positive or no relationship with influenza vaccine hesitancy.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Alfabetización en Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Humanos , China , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/psicología , Toma de DecisionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Chronically ill are vulnerable to vaccine preventable infections. Consequently, their vaccination behavior is highly relevant. Depressive comorbidities are frequent in these patients. Furthermore, these patients are mainly diagnosed, treated and vaccinated in primary care. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the associations between depression and vaccination behavior (COVID-19 and influenza) in adult chronically ill primary care patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, we examined depression (PHQ9), psychological antecedents of vaccinations (Confidence and Constraints), health care utilization, and vaccination status. Based on an effect model, descriptive statistics and mixed linear/logistic models were calculated. (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00030042). RESULTS: n = 795 patients were analyzed. Both psychological antecedents of vaccinations (Confidence and Constraints) mediated a negative association between depression and vaccination behavior, healthcare utilization mediated a positive association. The total effect of depression was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: As the effects of vaccination readiness and healthcare utilization are opposing, different total effects depending on the study population are possible. Further studies are needed to investigate additional predictors of vaccination behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We suggest tackling vaccine acceptance in chronically ill through increasing confidence using communication-based interventions, for which primary care is the suitable setting. Constraints might be reduced by reminder and recall systems.
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacunación , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Adulto , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Alemania , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Seasonal influenza presents an ongoing challenge to public health. The rapid evolution of the flu virus necessitates annual vaccination campaigns, but the decision to get vaccinated or not in a given year is largely voluntary, at least in the USA, and many people decide against it. In some early attempts to model these yearly flu vaccine decisions, it was often assumed that individuals behave rationally, and do so with perfect information-assumptions that allowed the techniques of classical economics and game theory to be applied. However, these assumptions are not fully supported by the emerging empirical evidence about human decision-making behavior in this context. We develop a simple model of coupled disease spread and vaccination dynamics that instead incorporates experimental observations from social psychology to model annual vaccine decision-making more realistically. We investigate population-level effects of these new decision-making assumptions, with the goal of understanding whether the population can self-organize into a state of herd immunity, and if so, under what conditions. Our model agrees with the established results while also revealing more subtle population-level behavior, including biennial oscillations about the herd immunity threshold.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Conceptos Matemáticos , Modelos Biológicos , Estaciones del Año , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at high risk for severe influenza. However, maternal influenza vaccination uptake in most World Health Organization (WHO) European Region countries remains low, despite the presence of widespread national recommendations. An influenza vaccination reduces influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in pregnancy, as well as providing newborns with protection in their first months. Potential determinants of vaccine hesitancy need to be identified to develop strategies that can increase vaccine acceptance and uptake among pregnant women. The primary objective of the systematic review is to identify the individual determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe, and how to overcome the hesitancy. METHODS: Databases were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2009 and 2019 inclusive. Databases included PubMed via MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, SAGE Journals, Taylor and Francis and Springer nature. These covered themes including psychology, medicine, and public health. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, 11 studies were eligible and analyzed for significant determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe. RESULTS: The most commonly reported factors were psychological aspects, for example concerns about safety and risks to mother and child, or general low risk perception of becoming ill from influenza. Doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine and a lack of knowledge about this topic were further factors. There was also influence of contextual factors, such as healthcare workers not providing adequate knowledge about the influenza vaccine or the pregnant lady stating their antivaccine sentiment. CONCLUSION: Health promotion that specifically increases knowledge among pregnant women about influenza and vaccination is important, supporting a valid risk judgment by the pregnant lady. The development of new information strategies for dialogue between healthcare providers and pregnant women should form part of this strategy.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Gripe Humana/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A/fisiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/virología , Embarazo , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Pandemias , Fotograbar , Distinciones y Premios , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/psicología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/transmisión , Comunicación , Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Relaciones Interpersonales , Irán , Italia , Distanciamiento Físico , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pandemias , Vacunación/tendencias , Negativa a la Vacunación/tendenciasRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Oseltamivir is an antiviral drug often preferred in treating viral infections. Its use has increased owing to annual influenza outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic. Although its adverse effects are often seen in the gastrointestinal system, it has other adverse effects that can prevent its use, for example, neuropsychiatric events. In this case report, we present a manic episode case caused by the use of oseltamivir.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/efectos adversos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/efectos de los fármacos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Manía/inducido químicamente , Manía/diagnóstico , Oseltamivir/efectos adversos , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Gripe Humana/psicología , Masculino , Manía/psicología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic generated renewed focus on infectious disease transmission in healthcare settings. This study aimed to evaluate staff perceptions towards influenza vaccination in the COVID-19 context. All healthcare workers within a major UK tertiary referral hospital were invited to answer a survey conducted from September 2nd to 13th, 2020. In all, 593 responses were received across a spectrum of roles; 44% reported they were more likely to get an influenza vaccine this year due to COVID-19; however, 10% felt that an influenza vaccine was less important due to social distancing. Additional questions evaluated intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination. There were substantial differences of opinion between staff groups.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/psicología , COVID-19/psicología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/normas , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Gripe Humana/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
A previously healthy 68-year-old man rapidly developed a severe melancholic depression following influenza infection. There is an evolving understanding of the complex and possibly bidirectional relationship between depression and inflammation. We review the literature concerning this relationship in the context of viral infection and discuss possible implications for treatment.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/etiología , Inflamación/psicología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Anciano , Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Humanos , Inflamación/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , MasculinoRESUMEN
In light of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and potential future infectious disease outbreaks, a comprehensive understanding of the negative effects of epidemics and pandemics on healthcare workers' mental health could inform appropriate support interventions. Thus, we aimed to synthesize and quantify the psychological and psychosomatic symptoms among frontline medical staff. We searched four databases up to March 19, 2020 and additional literature, with daily search alerts set up until October 26, 2020. Studies reporting psychological and/or psychosomatic symptoms of healthcare workers caring for patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome, H1N1, Ebola, Middle East respiratory syndrome, or COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently conducted the search, study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis and involved a third reviewer in case of disagreement. We used random effects modeling to estimate the overall prevalence rates of psychological/psychosomatic symptoms and the I2 statistic. We included 86 studies, reporting data from 75,991 participants. Frontline staff showed a wide range of symptoms, including concern about transmitting the virus to the family (60.39%, 95% CI 42.53-76.96), perceived stress (56.77%, 95% CI 34.21-77.95), concerns about own health (45.97%, 95% CI 31.08-61.23), sleeping difficulties (39.88%, 95% CI 27.70-52.72), burnout (31.81%, 95% CI 13.32-53.89), symptoms of depression (25.72%, 95% CI 18.34-33.86), symptoms of anxiety (25.36%, 95% CI 17.90-33.64), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (24.51%, 95% CI 18.16-31.46), mental health issues (23.11%, 95% CI 15.98-31.10), and symptoms of somatization (14.68%, 95% CI 10.67-19.18). We found consistent evidence for the pervasive and profound impact of large-scale outbreaks on the mental health of frontline healthcare workers. As the CO-VID-19 crisis continues to unfold, guaranteeing easy access to support structures for the entire healthcare workforce is vitally important.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Personal de Salud/psicología , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/psicología , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: We explored the association between influenza epidemic and suicide mortality rates in a large population using a time-series regression of 13-year mortality data in South Korea. METHODS: Weekly suicide mortalities and influenza-like illness (ILI) were analyzed using time series regression. Regression coefficient for suicide mortality based on percentage change of ILI was calculated using a quasi-Poisson regression. Non-linear distributed lag models with quadratic function up to 24 weeks were constructed. RESULTS: The association between ILI and suicide mortality increased significantly up to 8 weeks post-influenza diagnosis. A significant positive association between ILI and suicide mortality was observed from 2009, when a novel influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus provoked a worldwide pandemic. No meaningful association between these factors was observed before 2009. CONCLUSION: There was a significant positive relationship between ILI and suicide mortality after 2009, when a novel influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus provoked a worldwide pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Suicidio/psicología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A/patogenicidad , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Análisis de Regresión , República de Corea/epidemiología , Ideación Suicida , Suicidio/tendencias , Virosis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination is considered to be the most practical and effective preventative measure against influenza. It is highly recommended for population subgroups most at risk of developing complications, including pregnant women. However, seasonal influenza vaccine uptake remains suboptimal among pregnant women, even in jurisdictions with universal vaccination. We summarized the evidence on the determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy to better understand factors that influence vaccine uptake among pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from January 2000 to February 2020 for publications in English reporting on sociodemographic and/or health-related determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy. Two reviewers independently included studies. One reviewer extracted data and assessed study quality, and another reviewer checked extracted data and study quality assessments for errors. Disagreements were resolved through consensus, or a third reviewer. We meta-analyzed using the inverse variance, random-effects method, and reported the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: From 1663 retrieved citations, we included 36 studies. The following factors were associated with increased seasonal influenza vaccine uptake: Older age (20 studies: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), being nulliparous (13 studies: OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38), married (8 studies: OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), employed (4 studies: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24), a non-smoker (8 studies: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.51) and having prenatal care (3 studies: OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.25-5.02), a chronic condition (6 studies: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.44), been previously vaccinated (9 studies: OR 4.88, 95% CI 3.14-7.57) and living in a rural area (9 studies: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14). Compared with being black, being white was also associated with increased seasonal influenza vaccine uptake (11 studies: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that several sociodemographic and health-related factors may determine seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy, and that parity, history of influenza vaccination, prenatal care and comorbidity status may be influential.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adulto , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/psicología , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estaciones del AñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaccine-preventable diseases significantly influence the health and academic success of college students. Despite the known negative impact of these diseases, vaccination rates routinely fall short of national goals and recommendations. Although vaccination decisions are complex, a recommendation from a health care provider is one of the key motivators for individuals receiving a vaccine. Motivational interviewing (MI), a counseling approach primarily used to address substance abuse, can be applied to other health-related behaviors. LOCAL PROBLEM: Despite previous quality improvement efforts aimed at increasing vaccine rates for influenza, human papillomavirus (HPV), and meningitis B (MenB), vaccinations at large university health centers have been well below benchmarks set by Healthy People 2020. METHODS: This study was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and included MI training and regular reinforcement for health care providers to address vaccine hesitancy with college students. RESULTS: Influenza vaccination rates improved, but HPV vaccine rates remained stable and MenB vaccine rates decreased compared with the previous year. Clinicians demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge of MI techniques after a targeted educational intervention. Repeat measures indicate the potential for sustained improvement when ongoing reinforcement is provided. CONCLUSION: MI can be an effective part of a strategy to increase vaccination rates.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/normas , Entrevista Motivacional/normas , Estudiantes/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Masculino , Meningitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Meningitis/prevención & control , Meningitis/psicología , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/psicología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sudoeste de Estados Unidos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades/organización & administración , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Negativa a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Finding a link between COVID-19 and subsequent psychiatric symptoms has resulted in renewed interest in the psychiatric sequelae of pandemics. The first such instance was apparently the encephalitis lethargica pandemic which arose around the time of the First World War, moving in the shadow of a repiratory virus pandemic. The epidemic of encephalitis lethargica (EL), or Von Economo's Disease, in the years 1917-27 was the first pandemic involving the central nervous system. It moved in some places in parallel with the Great Flu Pandemic but does not seem to have been caused by it. Unlike the coronavirus, pandemic EL affected children heavily, leading often to bizarre changes in character and personality. It often left sequelae lasting for decades in the form of postencephalitic Parkinsonism (PEP). Unlike the coronavirus, it had a high mortality of around 20 percent. Although encephalitis lethargica involved a number of systems, psychiatric morbidity was most prominent and entailed severe depression, mania, catatonia and psychosis. It ended without therapeutic or public-health measures; today, sporadic cases of EL continue to be reported. The hypothesis is that we can derive from the EL psychiatric pandemic certain lessons that might be useful in studying tardive COVID symptoms today.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Psicológicos , Pandemias/historia , Enfermedad de Parkinson Posencefalítica/historia , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/virología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Influenza Pandémica, 1918-1919 , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/historia , Gripe Humana/psicología , Modelos Neurológicos , Enfermedad de Parkinson Posencefalítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson Posencefalítica/psicología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidadRESUMEN
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has broadly increased anxiety and changed individual behavior. However, there is limited research examining predictors of pandemic-related changes, and the majority of existing research is cross-sectional in nature, which limits causal inference. Given functional links with disease avoidance processes, individual differences in contamination fear may be especially relevant in predicting responses to COVID-19. Accordingly, the present study prospectively examines contamination fear and obsessive-compulsive washing symptoms as predictors of anxiety and safety behaviors in response to COVID-19 in a student sample (N = 108). To examine specificity, anxiety and safety behaviors in response to seasonal influenza are also examined. In the early stages of the pandemic (March 2020), coronavirus-related anxiety was higher than flu-related anxiety (d = 1.38). Obsessive-compulsive washing symptoms also increased from before the pandemic (d = 0.4). Although baseline contamination fear and obsessive-compulsive washing symptoms did not significantly predict coronavirus-related anxiety, contamination fear did significantly predict safety behavior usage in response to both COVID-19 and influenza. The specificity of the prospective association between contamination fear and the use of safety behaviors are discussed in the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic and the broader literature on the role of safety behaviors in anxiety.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Desinfección de las Manos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Adolescente , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/psicología , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Outbreaks of avian influenza H5N1 in poultry occurred in Africa's poultry and 16 countries have reported human infections globally. Intensified human-animal interactions necessitate correct communication of health messages to reduce zoonotic infection. This work was done to determine differences between pictorial and literal health education communication. Cross-sectional survey using literal and pictorial questionnaires in LBMs and poultry farms was carried out among respondents based on matching criteria. Responses were scored and analysed with probability of independence using Chi square test and pairwise correlation. The degree of knowledge of clinical signs in birds, species affected, communication means and biosecurity were good, that of the post-mortem signs was poor with increasing potentials of human exposure to virus-rich visceral tissues from slaughtered sick birds. Marked differences exist for the various items listed within each knowledge field, the odds of having correct responses from pictorial were better than with literal respondents. Risky practices were still practised in the LBMs despite the good degree of knowledge of hygiene and biosecurity. Knowledge and implementation does not always correlate and pictorial representation out surpasses literal method in communicating potential zoonotic H5N1 influenza A infection to the undiscerning public.
Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/fisiología , Gripe Aviar/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Zoonosis/prevención & control , Animales , Pollos , Coturnix , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Gripe Aviar/psicología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Nigeria , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/psicología , Struthioniformes , Pavos , Zoonosis/psicologíaRESUMEN
Public perceptions and sentiments play a crucial role in the success of vaccine uptake in the community. While vaccines have proven to be the best preventive method to combat the flu, the attitude and knowledge about vaccines are a major hindrance to higher uptake in most of the countries. The yearly coverage, especially in the vulnerable groups in the population, often remains below the herd immunity level despite the Flu Awareness Campaign organized by WHO every year worldwide. This brings immense challenges to the nation's public health protection agency for strategic decision-making in controlling the flu outbreak every year. To understand the impact of public perceptions and vaccination decisions while designing optimal immunization policy, we model the individual decision-making as a two-strategy pairwise contest game, where pay-off is considered as a function of public health effort for the campaign. We use Pontryagin's maximum principle to identify the best possible strategy for public health to implement vaccination and reduce infection at a minimum cost. Our optimal analysis shows that the cost of public health initiatives is qualitatively and quantitatively different under different public perceptions and attitudes towards vaccinations. When individual risk perception evolves with vaccine uptake or disease induced death, our model demonstrates a feed-forward mechanism in the dynamics of vaccination and exhibits an increase in vaccine uptake. Using numerical simulation, we also observe that the optimal cost can be minimized by putting the effort in the beginning and later part of the outbreak rather than during the peak. It confers that public health efforts towards disseminating disease severity or actual vaccination risk might accelerate the vaccination coverage and mitigate the infection faster.
Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Teoría del Juego , Gripe Humana , Modelos Biológicos , Opinión Pública , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inmunidad Colectiva , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Conceptos Matemáticos , Percepción , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maintaining health of healthcare workers with vaccination is a major component of pandemic preparedness and acceptance of vaccinations is essential to its success. This study aimed to examine impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on change of influenza vaccination acceptance and identify factors associated with acceptance of potential COVID-19 vaccination. METHOD: A cross-sectional self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among nurses in Hong Kong, China during 26 February and 31 March 2020. Their previous acceptance of influenza vaccination and intentions to accept influenza and COVID-19 vaccination were collected. Their relationship with work-related and other factors were examined using multiple multinomial logistic regressions. RESULTS: Responses from 806 participants were retrieved. More nurses changed from vaccination refusal to hesitancy or acceptance than those changed from acceptance to vaccination hesitancy or refusal (15.5% vs 6.8% among all participants, P < 0.001). 40.0% participants intended to accept COVID-19 vaccination, and those in private sector (OR: 1.67, 95%CI: 1.11-2.51), with chronic conditions (OR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.22-2.77), encountering with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients (OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.14-2.33), accepted influenza vaccination in 2019 (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.47-2.81) had higher intentions to accept it. Reasons for refusal and hesitation for COVID-19 vaccination included "suspicion on efficacy, effectiveness and safety", "believing it unnecessary", and "no time to take it". CONCLUSION: With a low level of COVID-19 acceptance intentions and high proportion of hesitation in both influenza and COVID-19 vaccination, evidence-based planning are needed to improve the uptake of both vaccinations in advance of their implementation. Future studies are needed to explore reasons of change of influenza vaccination acceptance, look for actual behaviour patterns of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and examine effectiveness of promotion strategies.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Intención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orthomyxoviridae/patogenicidad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Virales/inmunologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: During a pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) are essential to the health system response. Based on our knowledge, little information is available regarding the psychosocial impact on HCWs or interventions for supporting them during pandemics. Therefore, the study aimed to assess available literature on perceived stress and psychological responses to influenza pandemics in HCWs and identify implications for healthcare practice and future research. METHODS: This is a rapid review of the literature. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. RESULTS: Across all the studies-both qualitative and quantitative-HCWs working during the epidemic reported frequent concerns regarding their own health and the fear of infecting their families, friends and colleagues. Moreover, social isolation, uncertainty, fears of stigmatization and reluctance to work or considering absenteeism were frequently reported. Moreover, many studies highlighted a high prevalence of high levels of stress, anxiety and depression symptoms, which could have long-term psychological implications in HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid review offers an overview of the major concerns regarding HCWs' psychosocial well-being and possible preventive strategies, which could be useful for the current COVID-19 outbreak and similar future pandemics. Studies suggested to invest on preventive psychological, social, family and physical support and to guaranteeing reasonable work conditions and others in order to protect HCWs from the long-lasting psychological effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/psicología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Absentismo , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Estigma Social , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
This essay challenges generalizations since the late enlightenment about the effects of epidemics and pandemics on collective mentalities: that from antiquity to the present, epidemics, regardless of the disease, have sparked distrust, social violence, and the blaming of others. By contrast, the pandemic that killed the greatest numbers in world history-the Influenza of 1918-20 - was a pandemic of compassion. No one has yet to uncover this pandemic sparking collective violence or blaming any minorities for spreading the disease anywhere in the globe. The essay then explores the variety of charitable reactions and abnegation that cut across social divisions in communities from theatres of war in Europe to nations thousands of miles from the direct military encounters. Most remarkable, however, was the overflowing volunteerism of women, especially in the US, Canada, and Australia. To explain this widespread charitable reaction, the essay investigates the milieu of the First World War, showing how that context in domestic war settings was not conducive to risking life to aid total strangers, especially when those strangers came from different foreign countries classes, races, or religious faiths. I end with a reflection on the unfolding socio-psychological reactions to Covid-19 from the perspective of 1918-20.