Oral atenolol compared to oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma. / Atenolol oral comparado con propranolol oral para hemangioma infantil.

Introduction: Infantile hemangioma is the most frequent benign vascular tumor in childhood, with an incidence of 3 to 10%. When patients require treatment, oral propranolol, a non-selective lipophilic beta-blocker, is usually considered the therapy of choice. However, its use has been associated with several adverse events related to its ß-2 action and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Because of this, oral atenolol, a hydrophilic ß-1 receptor-selective beta-blocker, may represent a valid treatment alternative. Nonetheless, there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of atenolol when compared with propranolol as monotherapy for this condition. Methods: We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health science, which is maintained by screening multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, among others. Data were extracted from the identified reviews, data from the primary studies were analyzed, a meta-analysis was performed, and a summary table of the results was prepared using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Nine systematic reviews were identified, including 10 primary studies and three randomized trials. The three randomized trials were included in the analysis of this investigation. Conclusion: The use of oral atenolol compared with oral propranolol as monotherapies may result in little or no difference in terms of likelihood of complete remission, decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score, likelihood of post-treatment relapse, and risk of adverse events and severe adverse events, in infantile hemangioma (low certainty of evidence).

Introducción: El hemangioma infantil corresponde al tumor vascular benigno más frecuente de la infancia, con una incidencia de 3 a 10%. Entre los pacientes que requieren tratamiento el uso oral de propranolol, un betabloqueador no selectivo de tipo lipofílico, es usualmente considerado como la terapia de elección. Sin embargo, su uso se ha asociado a diversos efectos adversos, relacionados con su acción ß-2, y a su capacidad de cruzar la barrera hematoencefálica. Debido a esto, el uso oral de atenolol, un betabloqueador selectivo de receptores ß-1, de tipo hidrofílico, podría representar una alternativa válida de tratamiento. Sin embargo, aún existe controversia en relación con la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento con atenolol como monoterapia, en comparación con el uso de propranolol como monoterapia para esta condición. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el tamizaje de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Se extrajeron los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, se analizaron los datos de los estudios primarios, se realizó un metanálisis y se preparó una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados: Se identificaron nueve revisiones sistemáticas, que en conjunto incluyeron 10 estudios primarios y tres ensayos aleatorizados. Se incluyeron los tres ensayos aleatorizados en el análisis del presente trabajo. Conclusiones: El uso de atenolol oral como monoterapia, comparado con el uso de propranolol oral como monoterapia, podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en cuanto a la probabilidad de remisión completa, la disminución del , la probabilidad de recaída posterior al tratamiento y el riesgo de presentar efectos adversos y efectos adversos severos, en el hemangioma infantil (certeza de la evidencia baja).

Atenolol oral comparado con propranolol oral para hemangioma infantil / Oral atenolol compared to oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma

INTRODUCCIÓN: El hemangioma infantil corresponde al tumor vascular benigno más frecuente de la infancia, con una incidencia de 3 a 10%. Entre los pacientes que requieren tratamiento el uso oral de propranolol, un betabloqueador no selectivo de tipo lipofílico, es usualmente considerado como la terapia de elección. Sin embargo, su uso se ha asociado a diversos efectos adversos, relacionados con su acción ß-2, y a su capacidad de cruzar la barrera hematoencefálica. Debido a esto, el uso oral de atenolol, un betabloqueador selectivo de receptores ß-1, de tipo hidrofílico, podría representar una alternativa válida de tratamiento. Sin embargo, aún existe controversia en relación con la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento con atenolol como monoterapia, en comparación con el uso de propranolol como monoterapia para esta condición. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el tamizaje de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Se extrajeron los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, se analizaron los datos de los estudios primarios, se realizó un metanálisis y se preparó una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método , GRADE. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron nueve revisiones sistemáticas, que en conjunto incluyeron 10 estudios primarios y tres ensayos aleatorizados. Se incluyeron los tres ensayos aleatorizados en el análisis del presente trabajo. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de atenolol oral como monoterapia, comparado con el uso de propranolol oral como monoterapia, podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en cuanto a la probabilidad de remisión completa, la disminución del , la probabilidad de recaída posterior al tratamiento y el riesgo de presentar efectos adversos y efectos adversos severos, en el hemangioma infantil (certeza de la evidencia baja).

INTRODUCTION: Infantile hemangioma is the most frequent benign vascular tumor in childhood, with an incidence of 3 to 10%. When patients require treatment, oral propranolol, a non-selective lipophilic beta-blocker, is usually considered the therapy of choice. However, its use has been associated with several adverse events related to its ß-2 action and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Because of this, oral atenolol, a hydrophilic ß-1 receptor-selective beta-blocker, may represent a valid treatment alternative. Nonetheless, there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of atenolol when compared with propranolol as monotherapy for this condition. METHODS: We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health science, which is maintained by screening multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, among others. Data were extracted from the identified reviews, data from the primary studies were analyzed, a meta-analysis was performed, and a summary table of the results was prepared using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. RESULTS: Nine systematic reviews were identified, including 10 primary studies and three randomized trials. The three randomized trials were included in the analysis of this investigation. CONCLUSION: The use of oral atenolol compared with oral propranolol as monotherapies may result in little or no difference in terms of likelihood of complete remission, decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score, likelihood of post-treatment relapse, and risk of adverse events and severe adverse events, in infantile hemangioma (low certainty of evidence).

Evaluation of cases with infantile hemangioma requiring treatment.

AIM: Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign vascular tumours in infants. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of propranolol therapy in patients with infantile hemangioma.

Efficacy and safety of propranolol cream in infantile hemangioma: A prospective pilot study.

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is a common tumor in infants that gradually resolves and is often untreated. However, for cosmetic reasons, parents often opt for treatment. Oral propranolol, the first-line therapy for IH, is sometimes associated with several side effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoglycemia. No clinical studies on topical propranolol have been conducted using standardized procedures. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical propranolol in patients with IH. This multicenter, prospective pilot study was conducted from June 2019 to October 2020 and involved eight Japanese infants aged 35-150 days with proliferating IH. Patients were treated with 5% propranolol cream twice daily. We examined the efficacy rate based on central evaluation (complete or near-complete healing of the target hemangioma) at weeks 24 and 12, respectively, compared to baseline values. The efficacy rate at week 24 was 68.8% (95% confidence interval: 44.1-85.9%). The surface area, maximum diameter, and color intensity of the target IH decreased over time. Adverse event and drug-related adverse event rates were 87.5% and 0%, respectively. Propranolol cream may be effective and safe in Japanese patients with IH and may be considered a first-choice treatment for small and superficial IHs in cosmetically problematic areas.

Topical Formulations of Propranolol for Infantile Hemangiomas: Characteristics of Formulations and Three Cases of Infants Administered Topical Propranolol Cream.

Propranolol is used as the first-line treatment for infantile hemangiomas (IHs). As oral formulations can cause systemic adverse drug reactions (ADRs), we prepared topical propranolol formulations and evaluated their pharmaceutical profiles. We also present three cases of pediatric patients with IHs who were treated with the propranolol formulations. Propranolol cream (hydrophilic cream, 1, 3, and 5%) and gels (carboxyvinyl polymer, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, gellan gum, 1%) were prepared. The in vitro skin permeability of these formulations was assessed using Franz-type diffusion cells. The pharmaceutical profiles, including propranolol content, pH, and ductility, of the propranolol creams were evaluated. For the stability test, similar pharmaceutical evaluations were performed after the creams were stored at 25 °C and 56% relative humidity for 3 months. We examined three patients treated with propranolol cream to investigate the clinical course of IH and adverse events after the propranolol cream was applied for 5-12 months. In the in vitro skin permeability assay, topical propranolol formulations made of hydrophilic cream and gellan gum permeated the most. The amount of propranolol that permeated increased with propranolol concentration. After storage for 3 months, no substantial changes were observed in any pharmaceutical profile. The IHs were discolored in all patients. Tumor size also decreased in some patients. Furthermore, no adverse events caused by propranolol cream were observed during application. In conclusion, propranolol cream can be prepared as a hospital formulation with adequate quality. Topical propranolol therapy is effective in reducing the incidence of systemic ADRs.

Somatic p.T771R KDR (VEGFR2) Mutation Arising in a Sporadic Angioma During Ramucirumab Therapy.

IMPORTANCE: Inhibition of angiogenesis is an effective anticancer strategy because neoplasms require a rich blood supply. Ramucirumab, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014 to treat gastric adenocarcinomas and non-small cell lung carcinomas, targets vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2). We identified a patient prescribed a regimen of irinotecan hydrochloride, cetuximab, and ramucirumab for metastatic rectal cancer (diagnosed in November 2013 and treated through early January 2015) who developed a new-onset, expanding vascular lesion on his right leg. Via exome sequencing, we found that the lesion contained a single somatic mutation in KDR (encodes VEGFR2), possibly in response to ramucirumab. Vascular tumors are not a known complication of antiangiogenic therapeutics. OBSERVATIONS: Exome sequencing of the well-demarcated, blanching vascular lesion on the lateral right shin revealed a somatic p.T771R mutation in KDR, without evidence of other somatic mutations or loss of heterozygosity. Histological features included lobules of small vessels within the dermis, resembling a tufted angioma. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A potential adverse effect of ramucirumab in combination therapy is the development of sporadic angiomas. The p.T771R mutation was previously implicated in autophosphorylation of VEGFR2 and reported in angiosarcomas alongside other driver mutations. Our observations suggest that this mutation confers a proliferative advantage in the setting of ramucirumab therapy. Patients receiving ramucirumab should be monitored for the development of new vascular lesions.

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis in a very low-birthweight infant treated with erythropoietin.

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis (DNH) is a rare condition characterized by the concomitant development of multiple cutaneous infantile hemangiomas (IH) and visceral hemangiomas. Recently, an association between erythropoietin treatment and an increased incidence of infantile hemangioma was noted. A Japanese male infant was born via cesarean section at 27 weeks of gestation. Following the commencement of erythropoietin treatment for anemia of prematurity, he developed multiple cutaneous hemangiomas, high cardiac output heart failure and hepatomegaly. Abdominal imaging indicated comorbidity of diffuse infantile hepatic hemannigomas, resulting in the final diagnosis of DNH. The discontinuation of erythropoietin treatment and long-term therapy with propranolol improved the hepatic lesions and cutaneous hemangiomas. The possibility of multiple organ involvement and the exacerbating effects of erythropoietin treatment should be considered in cases in which multiple cutaneous hemangiomas develop in preterm infants receiving erythropoietin treatment.

Delayed-onset of multiple cutaneous infantile hemangiomas due to propranolol: a case report.

Infantile hemangiomas are the most common vascular tumors in childhood. In view of its proven effectiveness in such cases, propranolol is the drug of choice. We present the case of a male infant who started treatment with propranolol shortly after birth due to heart disease. After 7 months, when the patient had suffered various respiratory exacerbations, this treatment was suspended. One week later, multiple skin lesions (ie, multifocal infantile hemangiomas) began to appear, with no extracutaneous involvement. It was decided to resume treatment with propranolol, although at lower doses than before, and the skin lesions improved rapidly, with some disappearing completely. Treatment was definitively withdrawn at age 16 months, with only slight recurrence of the lesions. The case described is of multifocal infantile hemangiomas without extracutaneous involvement appearing beyond the neonatal period after treatment with propranolol beginning in the first days of life. The details of the case support the hypothesis that this drug is not only therapeutic but also plays a prophylactic role against infantile hemangiomas. In turn, this supports the recent proposal that this drug may be useful in preventing the growth and spread of tumors with high angiogenic potential. It is postulated that the inhibition of ß-adrenergic receptors is associated with multiple intracellular processes related to the progression and metastasis of different tumors.

Growth Hormone Induces Recurrence of Infantile Hemangiomas After Apparent Involution: Evidence of Growth Hormone Receptors in Infantile Hemangioma.

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign tumor of infancy, characterized by a natural history of early proliferation in the first months of life to eventual involution during childhood, often with residual fibrofatty tissue. Once involution has been achieved, IHs do not typically recur. We present two cases of exogenous growth hormone therapy resulting in the recurrence of IHs in late childhood, supported by radiological, immunohistochemical, in vitro, and in vivo evidence.

Evaluation of expression profiles of hematopoietic stem cell, endothelial cell, and myeloid cell antigens in spontaneous and chemically induced hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas in mice.

It is unclear whether the process of spontaneous and chemically induced hemangiosarcoma and hemangioma formation in mice involves the transformation of differentiated endothelial cells (ECs) or recruitment of multipotential bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells or endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which show some degree of endothelial differentiation. In the present study, immunohistochemical staining for hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD45 and CD34), EC markers (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR2], CD31, and factor VIII-related antigen), and a myeloid lineage marker (CD14) was employed to better define the origin of hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas in mice. Staining was negative for CD45, factor VIII-related antigen, and CD14 and positive for CD34, VEGFR2, and CD31, indicating that mouse hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas are composed of cells derived from EPCs expressing CD34, VEGFR2, and CD31 but not factor VIII-related antigen. The lack of CD45 expression suggests that mouse vascular tumors may arise from EPCs that are at a stage later than hematopoietic stem cells. Since factor VIII-related antigen expression is known to occur later than CD31 expression in EPCs, our observations may indicate that these tumor cells are arrested at a stage prior to complete differentiation.  In addition, myeloid lineage cells do not appear to contribute to hemangiosarcoma and hemangioma formation in mice.

Tocolysis with the ß-2-sympathomimetic hexoprenaline increases occurrence of infantile haemangioma in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most commonly observed tumour in children. Off-label pharmacological treatment of IH with the beta-blocker propranolol induces regression of IH. Based on the fact that IH are more frequently observed in premature babies than in mature babies and the evidence that beta-blocker therapy leads to regression of IH, the authors generated the hypothesis that the use of ß-2-sympathomimetics during pregnancy for inhibiting premature labour might increase occurrence of IH in preterm infants. METHODS: For group comparison t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used. Logistic regression was carried out by the forward stepwise method with Wald statistics. RESULTS: Data of 328 preterm infants (<32 gestational weeks) or with a birth weight of less than 1500 g (<36 gestational weeks) born between January 2006 and December 2008 were analysed. A total of 15 were excluded due do death within the 1st month of life, 38 because of lost to follow-up and six due to incomplete data. Complete data of 269 preterm infants were retrospectively analysed. During the follow-up period of median 1.6 years, 50 infants developed one or more IH within their first 6 months of life. IH occurred in 40/181 patients with intrauterine exposure to the ß-2-sympathomimetic hexoprenaline and in 10/88 without exposure (OR=4.3; 95% CI 1.4 to 13.8). Furthermore, the influence of antenatal exposure to glucocorticosteroids for induction of lung development was analysed. Prenatally exposed subjects showed reduced occurrence of IH (OR=0.2; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.8). CONCLUSION: Intrauterine exposure to the ß-2-sympathomimetic hexoprenaline might increase the occurrence of IH in preterm infants.

Tesaglitazar, a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist, hamster carcinogenicity, investigative animal and clinical studies.

Tesaglitazar was developed as a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα/γ). To support the clinical program, a hamster carcinogenicity study was performed. The only neoplastic findings possibly related to treatment with tesaglitazar were low incidences of hemangioma and hemangiosarcoma in the liver of male animals. A high-power, two-year investigative study with interim necropsies was performed to further elucidate these findings. Treatment with tesaglitazar resulted in changes typical for exaggerated PPARα pharmacology in rodents, such as hepatocellular hypertrophy and hepatocellular carcinoma, but not an increased frequency of hemangiosarcomas. At the highest dose level, there was an increased incidence of sinusoidal dilatation and hemangiomas. No increased endothelial cell (EC) proliferation was detected in vivo, which was confirmed by in vitro administration to ECs. Immunohistochemistry and gene expression analyses indicated increased cellular stress and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the liver, which may have contributed to the sinusoidal dilatation. A two-fold increase in the level of circulating VEGF was detected in the hamster at all dose levels, whereas no effect on VEGF was observed in patients treated with tesaglitazar. In conclusion, investigations have demonstrated that tesaglitazar does not produce hemangiosarcomas in hamster despite a slight effect on vascular morphology in the liver.

An association between infantile haemangiomas and erythropoietin treatment in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Infantile haemangiomas are benign vascular neoplasms that occur frequently in premature infants. The authors hypothesised that in addition to gestational age and birth weight, erythropoietin therapy may influence the incidence of these soft tissue tumours in preterm infants. METHODS: 2563 infants born prematurely and admitted to the Division of Neonatology, University of Heidelberg Medical School were investigated in a retrospective analysis. Hospital charts for all infants were reviewed for clinical data. The primary endpoint was the percentage of infants who had received erythropoietin treatment and were diagnosed with a haemangioma. RESULTS: Haemangiomas were diagnosed in 4.3% (n=110) of the 2563 preterm infants. These 110 infants had a median gestational age of 29 weeks (IQR 27-33 weeks) and the female:male ratio was 1.8:1. A higher incidence of haemangiomas (12-15%) was detected in premature infants with a lower gestational age (<31 weeks). Erythropoietin therapy was shown to be an independent risk factor after adjusting for all other known factors and oxygen therapy in multivariable analysis (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.55 to 5.12). Subgroup analysis revealed that the effect was more pronounced in male than female infants (HR 3.61, 95% CI 1.52 to 8.57). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates that erythropoietin treatment is associated with an increase in the incidence of these benign vascular tumours after adjusting for all other factors.

Skin hydration and transepidermal water loss in patients with a history of sulfur mustard contact: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Skin lesions are among the most common complications of contact with sulfur mustard. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to measure skin water content and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in patients with a history of sulfur mustard contact. METHODS: Three hundred ten male participants were included in this study: 87 (28.1%) sulfur mustard-exposed patients with current skin lesions (group 1), 71 (22.9%) sulfur mustard-exposed patients without skin lesions (group 2), 78 (25.2%) patients with dermatitis (group 3) and 74 (23.8%) normal controls (group 4) The water content and TEWL of skin was measured at four different locations of the body: forehead, suprasternal, palm and dorsum of hand. Nonparametric statistical tests (Kruskal-Wallis) were used to compare the four groups, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of participants were 44.0 +/- 6.7, 41.9 +/- 5.9, 43.8 +/- 9.3 and 44.8 +/- 8.9 years in groups 1 to 4, respectively (P = 0.146). Xerosis, post-lesional hyperpigmentation and lichenification were significantly more common in either sulfur mustard-exposed participants or non-exposed participants with dermatitis (P < 0.05). Skin hydration was higher in subjects with sulfur mustard contact than in non-injured participants (P < 0.05) in the dorsum and palm of hands and forehead. TEWL was significantly higher in participants only in suprasternal area and dorsum of hand. CONCLUSION: Contact with sulfur mustard agent can alter biophysical properties of the skin--especially the function of stratum corneum as a barrier to water loss-several years after exposure.