Screening for exclusion of high-risk bleeding features of esophageal varices in cirrhosis through CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Esophageal varices (EV) screening guidelines have evolved with improved risk stratification to avoid unnecessary esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in individuals with low bleeding risks. However, uncertainties persist in the recommendations for certain patient groups, particularly those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and/or receiving non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) without prior endoscopy. This study assessed the efficacy of imaging in ruling out EVs and their high-risk features associated with bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and with HCC. We also evaluated the impact of NSBB on the detection of these characteristics. METHODS: A total of 119 patients undergoing EGD with CT and/or MRI within 90 days of the procedure were included. 87 patients had HCC. A new imaging grading system was developed utilizing the size of EVs and the extent of their protrusion into the esophagus lumen. The negative predictive value (NPV) of EVimaging(-) versus EVimaging (+) (grades 1-3) in ruling out the presence of EV and/or high-risk features by EGD was calculated. The predictive performance of imaging was determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: The NPV of imaging for detecting EV and high-risk features was 81 % and 92 %, respectively. Among HCC patients, the NPV for EV and high-risk features was 80 % and 64 %, respectively. Being on NSBB didn't statistically impact the imaging detection of EV. Imaging was a better predictor of high-risk EGD findings than Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that imaging can effectively rule out the presence of EV and high-risk features during EGD, even in patients with HCC and/or receiving NSBB.

The Role of Imaging for GI Bleeding: ACG and SAR Consensus Recommendations.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is being published concurrently in American Journal of Gastroenterology and Radiology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.

Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Refractory to Endoscopic Management: Indications and Role of Interventional Radiology.

For over 60 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology have been heavily involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients who present with upper GI bleeding and have a contraindication to endoscopy or have an unsuccessful attempt at endoscopy for identifying or controlling the bleeding, interventional radiology is often consulted for evaluation and consideration of catheter-based intervention.

Diagnostic value of liver stiffness measurement combined with risk scores for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and three bleeding risk scoring systems for esophagogastric varices bleeding (EGVB) in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization. METHODS: In this study, 210 patients who had hepatitis B cirrhosis were selected as the subjects. They were categorized into two groups based on whether EGVB occurred during hospitalization: a bleeding group (70 cases) and a non-bleeding group (140 cases). Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors related to the occurrence of EGVB, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in systolic blood pressure, platelet count, albumin, urea nitrogen, LSM, pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PRS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and AIMS65 score (P < 0.05). The correlation analysis showed that LSM had significant positive relationship with PRS, GBS and AIMS65 score. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LSM and GBS score were independent risk factors for EGVB occurrence during hospitalization. ROC curve analysis showed that the combined prediction model of LSM and GBS score had the best prediction performance for EGVB occurrence, with an ROC curve area of 0.811, which was significantly better than the three risk scoring systems (P < 0.05), but similar to the predicted value of LSM (P = 0.335). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of LSM and GBS score can significantly improve the predictive efficacy of EGVB occurrence in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization, which has important clinical significance for patients' prognosis.

Incidental Bleeding Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Identified on 99m Tc-RBC Scintigraphy.

ABSTRACT: Various pathologies could lead to occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Here we report the case of a 73-year-old woman who presented with hematochezia and syncope, and was found to have a large bleeding GI stromal tumor incidentally from 99m Tc-RBC scintigraphy. This study was done after negative workup with CT angiography, colonoscopy, and capsule endoscopy for the source of GI bleeding. Final pathology confirmed the mass being a low-grade GI stromal tumor after exploratory laparotomy.

An unusual cause of life-threatening upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

A previously healthy 56-year-old female was hospitalized with intermittent melena and transient syncope for 1-month duration. Physical examination on admission showed heart rate was 105 beats per minute and blood pressure was 89/55 mmHg. Her hemoglobin was 6.7 g/dl. She received fluid infusion, blood transfusion, acid suppression and hemostasis treatment. Abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a well-defined mass with uniform adipose density in the antrum measuring 4 × 5 cm. Gastroscopy revealed a giant submucosal tumor with superficial ulceration in anterior wall of the gastric antrum. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a homogeneous, well-circumscribed, hyperechoic mass originated from the submucosa layer. Distal partial gastrectomy was performed. Postoperative histopathology examination of the resected specimen revealed the tumor was composed of closely arranged and uniformly shaped proliferative mature adipocytes, which located in the submucosa layer with superficial mucosal ulcer. The patient was diagnosed as giant gastric lipoma with superficial ulcer and no symptoms was observed in 3 months follow-up.

Spontaneous duodenal wall hematoma.

59-year-old man, smoker, diabetic and hypertensive. He went to the ER due to fixed abdominal pain in the epigastrium, diaphoresis, dizziness, nausea, and "coffee grounds" vomiting. On examination he presented abdominal distension and pain on palpation in the epigastrium, without peritonism. He had a BP of 235/100 mmHg and in the blood-tests, leukocytosis with neutrophilia and normal hemoglobin. An urgent abdominal CT scan was performed, identifying a 5x6 cm nodular lesion of homogeneous density attached to the wall of the second and third duodenal portions that compressed the lumen, with two vessels with active bleeding within it. Therefore, percutaneous embolization of the gastroduodenal artery was performed. Subsequently, the patient suffered an episode of severe acute pancreatitis that required ICU admission. Finally, he presented a good clinical evolution with ceasing of pain, complete reabsorption of the hematoma and resolution of the obstructive symptoms.

Diagnostic utility of CT angiography compared with endoscopy in patients with acute GI hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because it is minimally invasive, CT angiography (CTA) has emerged as an attractive diagnostic tool for investigation of acute GI hemorrhage. METHODS: This study examined patients with acute GI bleeding who underwent CTA. RESULTS: CTA was the initial diagnostic examination in 177 patients, identifying upper and lower GI bleeding lesions in 16 and 27 patients, respectively. In 103 patients with an initial negative CTA, 78 had endoscopy (32 EGD and 46 colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy), of whom 52 (67%) had a bleeding lesion identified, including 23 with a high-risk bleeding lesion requiring therapy. Peptic ulcer disease and diverticular bleeding were the most commonly identified bleeding lesions. With endoscopy as a criterion standard, the sensitivity of CTA for the detection of a source of GI bleeding was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: CTA has very poor sensitivity for identification of a GI bleeding source or lesion, suggesting that CTA should not be used as an initial diagnostic test.