Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.572
Filtrar
1.
MSMR ; 31(5): 2-8, 2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847619

RESUMEN

Mortality surveillance is an important activity for capturing information on a population's health. This retrospective surveillance analysis utilizes administrative data sources to describe active duty U.S. Army soldiers who died from 2014 to 2019, and calculate mortality rates, assess trends by category of death, and identify leading causes of death within subpopulations. During the surveillance period, 2,530 soldier deaths were reported. The highest crude mortality rates observed during the 6-year surveillance period were for deaths by suicide, followed by accidental (i.e., unintentional injury) deaths. The crude mortality rates for natural deaths decreased significantly over the 6-year period, by an average of 6% annually. The leading causes of death were suicide by gunshot wound, motor vehicle accidents, suicide by hanging, neoplasms, and cardiovascular events. Significant differences were observed in the leading causes of death in relation to demographic characteristics, which has important implications for the development of focused educational campaigns to improve health behaviors and safe driving habits. Current public health programs to prevent suicide should be evaluated, with new approaches for firearm safety considered.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Personal Militar , Vigilancia de la Población , Suicidio , Humanos , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2412535, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776084

RESUMEN

Importance: Reducing the pretrial detention population has been a cornerstone of movements to end mass incarceration. Across many US cities, there are ongoing public debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some raising concerns that doing so would increase community violence. Objective: To evaluate changes in firearm violence after New Jersey's 2017 bail reform policy that eliminated financial barriers to avoiding pretrial detention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study used synthetic control methods to examine changes in firearm mortality and combined fatal and nonfatal shootings in New Jersey (2014-2019). New Jersey was chosen because it was one of the first states to systematically implement cash bail reform. Outcomes in New Jersey were compared with a weighted combination of 36 states that did not implement any kind of reform to pretrial detention during the study period. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Implementation of New Jersey's cash bail reform law in 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly rates of fatal and nonfatal firearm assault injuries and firearm self-harm injuries per 100 000 people. Results: Although New Jersey's pretrial detention population dramatically decreased under bail reform, the study did not find evidence of increases in overall firearm mortality (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.26 deaths per 100 000) or gun violence (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.24 deaths per 100 000), or within racialized groups during the postpolicy period. Conclusions and Relevance: Incarceration and gun violence are major public health problems impacting racially and economically marginalized groups. Cash bail reform may be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbating community violence.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , New Jersey/epidemiología , Humanos , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/economía , Masculino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Adulto , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
4.
JAMA ; 331(20): 1741-1747, 2024 05 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703404

RESUMEN

Importance: Youth (those aged <18 years) parental death has been associated with negative health outcomes. Understanding the burden of parental death due to drug poisoning (herein, drugs) and firearms is essential for informing interventions. Objective: To estimate the incidence of youth parental death due to drugs, firearms, and all other causes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using vital registration, including all US decedents, and census data from January 1990 through December 2020. Data were analyzed from May 30, 2023, to March 28, 2024. Exposures: Parental death due to drug poisoning or firearms. Main Outcomes and Measures: A demographic matrix projection model was used to estimate the number and incidence of youth experiencing parental death, defined as the death of 1 or more parents, per 1000 population aged less than 18 years. Analyses evaluated parental deaths by drugs, firearms, and all other causes from 1999 through 2020 by race and ethnicity. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 931 785 drug poisoning deaths and 736 779 firearm-related deaths with a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (16.3) years. Most deaths occurred among males (73.8%) and White decedents (70.8%) followed by Black (17.5%) and Hispanic (9.5%) decedents. An estimated 759 000 (95% CI, 722 000-800 000) youth experienced parental death due to drugs and an estimated 434 000 (95% CI, 409 000-460 000) youth experienced parental death due to firearms, accounting for 17% of all parental deaths. From 1999 to 2020, the estimated number of youth who experienced parental death increased 345% (95% CI, 334%-361%) due to drugs and 39% (95% CI, 37%-41%) due to firearms compared with 24% (95% CI, 23%-25%) due to all other causes. Black youth experienced a disproportionate burden of parental deaths, based primarily on firearm deaths among fathers. In 2020, drugs and firearms accounted for 23% of all parental deaths, double the proportion in 1999 (12%). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this modeling study suggest that US youth are at high and increasing risk of experiencing parental death by drugs or firearms. Efforts to stem this problem should prioritize averting drug overdoses and firearm violence, especially among structurally marginalized groups.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Muerte Parental , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Causas de Muerte , Estudios Transversales , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Muerte Parental/estadística & datos numéricos , Muerte Parental/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Padre/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
JAMA ; 331(20): 1732-1740, 2024 05 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703403

RESUMEN

Importance: Mortality rates in US youth have increased in recent years. An understanding of the role of racial and ethnic disparities in these increases is lacking. Objective: To compare all-cause and cause-specific mortality trends and rates among youth with Hispanic ethnicity and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and White race. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study conducted temporal analysis (1999-2020) and comparison of aggregate mortality rates (2016-2020) for youth aged 1 to 19 years using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Data were analyzed from June 30, 2023, to January 17, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled, all-cause, and cause-specific mortality rates per 100 000 youth (hereinafter, per 100 000) for leading underlying causes of death were compared. Injuries were classified by mechanism and intent. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 491 680 deaths among US youth, including 8894 (1.8%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 14 507 (3.0%) Asian or Pacific Islander, 110 154 (22.4%) Black, 89 251 (18.2%) Hispanic, and 267 452 (54.4%) White youth. Between 2016 and 2020, pooled all-cause mortality rates were 48.79 per 100 000 (95% CI, 46.58-51.00) in American Indian or Alaska Native youth, 15.25 per 100 000 (95% CI, 14.75-15.76) in Asian or Pacific Islander youth, 42.33 per 100 000 (95% CI, 41.81-42.86) in Black youth, 21.48 per 100 000 (95% CI, 21.19-21.77) in Hispanic youth, and 24.07 per 100 000 (95% CI, 23.86-24.28) in White youth. All-cause mortality ratios compared with White youth were 2.03 (95% CI, 1.93-2.12) among American Indian or Alaska Native youth, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.66) among Asian or Pacific Islander youth, 1.76 (95% CI, 1.73-1.79) among Black youth, and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91) among Hispanic youth. From 2016 to 2020, the homicide rate in Black youth was 12.81 (95% CI, 12.52-13.10) per 100 000, which was 10.20 (95% CI, 9.75-10.66) times that of White youth. The suicide rate for American Indian or Alaska Native youth was 11.37 (95% CI, 10.30-12.43) per 100 000, which was 2.60 (95% CI, 2.35-2.86) times that of White youth. The firearm mortality rate for Black youth was 12.88 (95% CI, 12.59-13.17) per 100 000, which was 4.14 (95% CI, 4.00-4.28) times that of White youth. American Indian or Alaska Native youth had a firearm mortality rate of 6.67 (95% CI, 5.85-7.49) per 100 000, which was 2.14 (95% CI, 1.88- 2.43) times that of White youth. Black youth had an asthma mortality rate of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.18) per 100 000, which was 7.80 (95% CI, 6.78-8.99) times that of White youth. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, racial and ethnic disparities were observed for almost all leading causes of injury and disease that were associated with recent increases in youth mortality rates. Addressing the increasing disparities affecting American Indian or Alaska Native and Black youth will require efforts to prevent homicide and suicide, especially those events involving firearms.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Suicidio , Heridas y Lesiones , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/etnología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Suicidio/etnología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/etnología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático Americano Nativo Hawáiano y de las Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etnología , Asma/mortalidad , Homicidio/etnología , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etnología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad
9.
J Surg Res ; 298: 128-136, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603943

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There has been a sharp climb in the Unites States' death rate among opioid and other substance abuse patients, as well as an increased prevalence in gun violence. We aimed to investigate the association between substance abuse and gun violence in a national sample of patients presenting to US emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We queried the 2018-2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for patients ≥18 years with substance abuse disorders (opioid and other) using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Within this sample, we analyzed characteristics and outcomes of patients with firearm-related injuries. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were ED charges and length of stay. RESULTS: Among the 25.2 million substance use disorder (SUD) patients in our analysis, 35,306 (0.14%) had a firearm-related diagnosis. Compared to other SUD patients, firearm-SUD patients were younger (33.3 versus 44.7 years, P < 0.001), primarily male (88.6% versus 54.2%, P < 0.001), of lower-income status (0-25th percentile income: 56.4% versus 40.5%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be insured by Medicaid or self-pay (71.6% versus 53.2%, P < 0.001). Firearm-SUD patients had higher mortality (1.4% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001), longer lengths of stay (6.5 versus 4.9 days, P < 0.001), and higher ED charges ($9269 versus $5,164, P < 0.001). Firearm-SUD patients had a 60.3% rate of psychiatric diagnoses. Firearm-SUD patients had 5.5 times greater odds of mortality in adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio: 5.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-substance abuse patients with firearm injuries have higher mortality rates and costs among these groups, with limited discharge to postacute care resources. All these factors together point to the urgent need for improved screening and treatment for this vulnerable group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Epidemia de Opioides/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Surg Res ; 298: 169-175, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615550

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created difficulties in access to care. There was also increased penetrating trauma in adults, which has been attributed to factors including increased firearm sales and social isolation. However, less is known about the relationship between the pandemic and pediatric trauma patients (PTPs). This study aimed to investigate the national incidence of penetrating trauma in PTPs, hypothesizing a higher rate with onset of the pandemic. We additionally hypothesized increased risk of complications and death in penetrating PTPs after the pandemic versus prepandemic. METHODS: We included all PTPs (aged ≤17-years-old) from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, dividing the dataset into two eras: prepandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic (2020). We performed subset analyses of the pandemic and prepandemic penetrating PTPs. Bivariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of the 474,524 PTPs, 123,804 (26.1%) were from the pandemic year. The pandemic era had increased stab wounds (3.3% versus 2.8%, P > 0.001) and gunshot wounds (5.5% versus 4.0%, P < 0.001) compared to the prepandemic era. Among penetrating PTPs, the rates and associated risk of in-hospital complications (2.6% versus 2.8%, P = 0.23) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.79-1.02, P = 0.11) and mortality (4.9% versus 5.0%, P = 0.58) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.78-1.03, P = 0.12) were similar between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: This national analysis confirms increased penetrating trauma, particularly gunshot wounds in pediatric patients following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this increase, there was no elevated risk of death or complications, suggesting that trauma systems adapted to the "dual pandemic" of COVID-19 and firearm violence in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pandemias , Lactante , Bases de Datos Factuales
11.
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol ; 73(3): 247-256, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662466

RESUMEN

Aim: AAnalysis of the choice of suicide method by gender and age of the deceased. Material and methods: The study presented here was based on a retrospective analysis of autopsy reports from the years 2001-2010 in the Department of Forensic Medicine of the Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum in Kraków. The basis of the research work conducted was the collection and extensive analysis of cases of suicide deaths. Subsequently, a preference analysis of the choice of suicide method was conducted, taking into account the age and gender of the deceased. The statistical analysis performed used logistic regression in Excel's XLSTAT as an analysis tool. Results: A total of 2,073 suicide cases were collected from the time frame under discussion. The predominant method of suicide was hanging (1524 cases, 1329 men and 195 women), the second most common method was jumping from the roof or window of a high floor of a building (jumping from heights; 171 cases, 100 men, 71 women). A statistically significant correlation of suicide method with gender was found for: hanging [odds ratio (OR) male (M) vs. female (F) = 3. 4; confidence interval (CI) = 2.7-4.3; p0.001]; drowning [OR: M/F =4.1; CI = 2.6-6.4; p0.001]; jumping from heights [OR: M/F=4.1; CI=2.9-5.7; p0.001] and poisoning [OR: M/F=3.2; CI = 2.1-4.9]. Suicide with the use of firearms occurred exclusively in the case of men (40 cases). The age of the victims correlated with the method of committing suicide by jumping from heights [0R=0.98; CI=0.97-0.99; p0.001] and rail suicide [OR=0.98; CI=0.96-0.99; p0.001]. Conclusions: The study revealed that both age and gender have a significant impact on the choice of suicide method. According to available epidemiological data and the authors' predictions, a predominance of male over female sex was observed in the case of hanging, while jumping from heights was relatively more often chosen by women. The elderly were less likely to choose jumping from heights and rail suicide.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo , Distribución por Edad , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio Completo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Asfixia/mortalidad , Adulto Joven , Traumatismos del Cuello/mortalidad , Ahogamiento/mortalidad , Autopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicina Legal/métodos
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(5): 592-597, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Redlining began in the 1930s with the Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC); this discriminatory practice limited mortgage availability and reinforced concentrated poverty that still exists today. It is important to understand the potential health implications of this federally sanctioned segregation. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between historical redlining policies and present-day nonsuicide firearm fatalities. DESIGN: Maps from the HOLC were overlaid with incidence of nonsuicide firearm fatalities from 2014 to 2022. A multilevel negative binomial regression model tested the association between modern-day firearm fatalities and HOLC historical grading (A ["best"] to D ["hazardous"]), controlling for year, HOLC area-level demographics, and state-level factors as fixed effects and a random intercept for city. Incidence rates (IRs) per 100 000 persons, incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and adjusted IRRs (aIRRs) for each HOLC grade were estimated using A-rated areas as the reference. SETTING: 202 cities with areas graded by the HOLC in the 1930s. PARTICIPANTS: Population of the 8597 areas assessed by the HOLC. MEASUREMENTS: Nonsuicide firearm fatalities. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2022, a total of 41 428 nonsuicide firearm fatalities occurred in HOLC-graded areas. The firearm fatality rate increased as the HOLC grade progressed from A to D. In A-graded areas, the IR was 3.78 (95% CI, 3.52 to 4.05) per 100 000 persons per year. In B-graded areas, the IR, IRR, and aIRR relative to A areas were 7.43 (CI, 7.24 to 7.62) per 100 000 persons per year, 2.12 (CI, 1.94 to 2.32), and 1.42 (CI, 1.30 to 1.54), respectively. In C-graded areas, these values were 11.24 (CI, 11.08 to 11.40) per 100 000 persons per year, 3.78 (CI, 3.47 to 4.12), and 1.90 (CI, 1.75 to 2.07), respectively. In D-graded areas, these values were 16.26 (CI, 16.01 to 16.52) per 100 000 persons per year, 5.51 (CI, 5.05 to 6.02), and 2.07 (CI, 1.90 to 2.25), respectively. LIMITATION: The Gun Violence Archive relies on media coverage and police reports. CONCLUSION: Discriminatory redlining policies from 80 years ago are associated with nonsuicide firearm fatalities today. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Fred Lovejoy Housestaff Research and Education Fund.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Incidencia
13.
Leg Med (Tokyo) ; 68: 102433, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467102

RESUMEN

This study aims to discuss the forensic and criminological implications of child homicides in the territory of Milan, Italy. The authors present a retrospective study on all the cases of child and adolescent homicides, that were observed at the Institute of Legal Medicine of Milan (Italy) in the last 30 years (from January 1991 to December 2020). A total of 46 child homicides were collected, focusing on the sociological features, by highlighting peculiar cases, risk factors, potential changing social trends, and comparing our cases with the current literature. The analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) for male adolescents and indicated that adolescent homicides were more frequently perpetrated in extrafamilial contexts. In contrast, neonaticides and infanticides were mainly committed at home. Furthermore, the Fisher's Exact test revealed that child murders were mainly committed by immigrants in the Milan district after 2005 (p < 0.05). The two main causes of death were due to sharp and firearm injuries. While the relationship between homicide clusters and homicides committed by sharp objects was not significant, adolescent homicides were mainly committed using firearms (p < 0.05). The present study may help to identify risk factors for homicides against child and adolescent. Consequently, policies that identify, prevent, and minimize this extreme violence should be designed to interrupt the vicious circle of such dreadful murderous events. Child and adolescent homicides deserve additional focus and better education for healthcare professionals and further research should be carried out to develop therapeutic and caring strategies.


Asunto(s)
Homicidio , Humanos , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/tendencias , Italia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactante , Factores de Riesgo , Preescolar , Recién Nacido , Infanticidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte
14.
J Urban Health ; 101(2): 262-271, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453763

RESUMEN

One in five fatal police shooting victims may have been experiencing a mental health crisis (MHC) at the time of their death [1]. We use data on fatal police shootings from the National Violent Death Reporting System (2014-2015) to (a) identify incidents where the victim is reported to have experienced an MHC at the time of their death, (b) describe the characteristics of these incidents, and (c) compare the characteristics of MHC to fatal police shootings where the victim was not experiencing an MHC at the time of their death. We systematically coded 633 fatal police shootings from 27 states. Descriptive statistics characterized fatal police shootings, including victim characteristics; their mental health status; and contextual information regarding the police encounter (e.g., reason for police call). Overall, 203 of 633 fatal police encounters (32%) involved victims who showed signs of an MHC at the time of their death. Victims were predominantly white, male, and in possession of a firearm. In 3 of 4 cases, the MHC manifested as suicidal ideation despite any relevant documented history among most victims. Among half of suicidal victims, suicidal ideation was expressed verbally and in-person to a family member/intimate partner who subsequently called the police. Dispatch was aware of the MHC in 1 of 4 of total police calls. Overall, fatal police encounters involving those experiencing an MHC accounted for 1 in 3 of our caseloads. Approximately, 3 of 4 mental health calls involved a suicidal person who mainly expressed intent to a loved one in-person.


Asunto(s)
Policia , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/psicología , Adulto Joven , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Salud Mental , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Anciano
15.
J Urban Health ; 101(2): 272-279, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546938

RESUMEN

The gun assault case fatality rate measures the fraction of shooting victims who die from their wounds. Considerable debate has surrounded whether gun assault case fatality rates have changed over time and what factors may be involved. We use crime event data from Los Angeles to examine the victim and situational correlates of gun assault case fatality rates over time. We estimated log binomial regression models for the probability of death in each year from 2005 to 2021, conditioned on situational and victim characteristics of the crime. Case fatality rates increased by around 1.3% per year between 2005 and 2021 from around 15.9 to 19.7%. Baseline case fatality rates differed systematically by most situational and victim but followed similar temporal trends. Only victim age significantly covaried with the temporal trend in case fatality rates. An individual shot in Los Angeles in 2021 was 23.7% more likely to die than the equivalent victim in 2005. The steady increase in case fatality rates suggests that there were around 394 excess fatalities over what would have occurred if case fatality rates remained at the 2005 level. Increases in the average age of victims over time may contribute to the general temporal trend. We hypothesize that older victims are more likely to be shot indoors where lethal close-range wounds are more likely.


Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Masculino , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad
16.
Am J Med ; 137(5): 426-432, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite broad recognition of the physical inactivity pandemic, little to no progress has been made in the past decade in mitigating the problem. The current analysis builds upon previous research into the drivers of physical inactivity to assess the potential interactions with firearm violence in the United States. METHODS: We merged county-level data on firearm fatality rates, physical inactivity prevalence, the Social Vulnerability Index, and the American nations regional cultures schematic. RESULTS: Counties with a physical inactivity prevalence currently above the federal government's 2030 goal (ie, ≥21.8%) had a significantly higher firearm fatality rate per 100,000 population. This finding was consistent for both the overall rate and race-based subgroups. The overall White, Hispanic, and Black firearm fatality rates were also significantly higher in the American nations group comprising Greater Appalachia, Deep South, El Norte, New France, and First Nation. Stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that the Social Vulnerability Index, American nations dichotomous grouping, and firearm fatality rate were all retained (P < .001) in predicting physical inactivity prevalence as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the United States faces myriad health and societal challenges. Unhealthy lifestyles and gun violence are two of the leaders. The current analysis in conjunction with previous findings demonstrates that solving these challenges by interacting, create complexity to finding solutions that has not been thoroughly considered.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Conducta Sedentaria , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1365-1374, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290493

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although firearms are implicated in the majority of law enforcement intervention (LEI)-related deaths, scientific research is lacking. The present study sought to characterize clinical and financial outcomes between injured suspects and other gunshot wound (GSW) patients. STUDY DESIGN: The 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients ≥16 years old admitted following GSW. Patients were categorized as injured suspects (ISs) if they were injured in LEI and non-IS otherwise. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality with complications, hospitalization duration (LOS), and costs secondarily considered. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for patient characteristics, injury burden using the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM), and hospital factors. RESULTS: Of 143,125 hospitalizations, 1575 (1.10%) were IS. Compared to non-IS, ISs were less frequently Black (24.4% vs 54.3%) but had a higher proportion of psychiatric conditions (19.4% vs 6.4%) (P < .05). Although having a similar requirement for major operations and TMPM score, ISs more frequently underwent thoracic (11.4% vs 4.1%) and gastrointestinal operations (33.0% vs 25.7%) (P < .05). After adjustment, IS was associated with similar odds of mortality but was associated with greater odds of cardiac complications, respiratory failure, and need for intensive care. While LOS was similar, IS was associated with greater costs (ß: +$14,300, 95% CI: 6,200-22,400). CONCLUSIONS: Suspects injured during law enforcement intervention have similar in-hospital mortality but greater complication rates and costs. Through the quantification of the clinical and financial burden of IS, our findings may help inform further policy discussions regarding use of potentially lethal force in law enforcement intervention.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Aplicación de la Ley , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Adolescente
19.
J Community Health ; 49(1): 86-90, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37505361

RESUMEN

Law enforcement officers in the U.S. are more likely to use lethal force against non-Hispanic Black citizens than on their non-Hispanic White counterparts. The purpose of this study was to assess estimates of the national prevalence of fatal firearm violence by law enforcement officers (LEOs) against non-Hispanic Black Americans. The Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and joinpoint regression from 2011 to 2020. During the decade (2011-2020) LEOs fatally shot 5,073 citizens and 1,170 were non-Hispanic Black (23%). The vast majority (96%) were males and two-thirds (66%) of those killed were ages 20-39 years. The region with the highest number of LEO fatal shootings was the Western U.S. Firearm deaths of non-Hispanic Blacks were the dominant (82%) method of LEO-induced deaths. Non-Hispanic Black Americans experience LEO firearm-related injuries and deaths at a much higher rate than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. In the context of the racial disparities among people who die following LEO-related gunshot wounds, changes to police training systems and an examination of implicit biases among LEOs should be investigated as the next step in reducing the use of lethal force practices.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Policia , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano , Homicidio , Aplicación de la Ley , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Adulto Joven , Adulto
20.
Pediatrics ; 152(3)2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37599647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2020, firearm injuries became the leading cause of death among US children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate new 2021 data on US pediatric firearm deaths and disparities to understand trends compared with previous years. METHODS: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research was queried for firearm mortalities in children/adolescents from 2018 to 2021. Absolute mortality, death rates, and characteristics were reported. Death rates were defined per 100 000 persons in that population per year. Death rates across states were illustrated via geographic heat maps, and correlations with state poverty levels were calculated. RESULTS: In 2021, firearms continued to be the leading cause of death among US children. From 2018 to 2021, there was a 41.6% increase in the firearm death rate. In 2021, among children who died by firearms, 84.8% were male, 49.9% were Black, 82.6% were aged 15 to 19 years, and 64.3% died by homicide. Black children accounted for 67.3% of firearm homicides, with a death rate increase of 1.8 from 2020 to 2021. White children accounted for 78.4% of firearm suicides. From 2020 to 2021, the suicide rate increased among Black and white children, yet decreased among American Indian or Alaskan Native children. Geographically, there were worsening clusters of firearm death rates in Southern states and increasing rates in Midwestern states from 2018 to 2021. Across the United States, higher poverty levels correlated with higher firearm death rates (R = 0.76, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: US pediatric firearm deaths increased in 2021, above the spike in 2020, with worsening disparities. Implementation of prevention strategies and policies among communities at highest risk is critical.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Suicidio , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Negro o Afroamericano , Blanco , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA