RESUMEN
Parastomal hernias are an inevitable consequence of ostomy formation and their repairs remain a challenge to many surgeons. With multiple systems of classification and a multitude of techniques for hernia repair ranging from suture to mesh repair, the literature remains sparse with regards to the optimal method of repair. The authors describe the most commonly adopted techniques, discuss preventative measures, and review the current literature in the context of perioperative outcomes and hernia recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMEN
The treatment of parastomal hernias (PSH) represents a major challenge in hernia surgery. Various techniques have been reported with different outcomes in terms of complication and recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to share our initial experience with the implantation of the DynaMesh-IPST-R and -IPST, intraperitoneal funnel meshes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated for PSH between March 2019 and April 2023 using the chimney technique with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R or IPST. The primary outcome was recurrence and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, the latter assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 21 consecutive patients were treated with intraperitoneal PVDF funnel meshes, 17 with IPST-R and 4 with IPST. There were no intraoperative complications. Overall, no complications occurred in 61.9% (n = 12) of the patients. Major postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were noted in four cases (19.0%). During the mean follow-up period of 21.6 (range 4.8-37.5) months, one patient (4.8%) had a recurrence. In conclusion, for the treatment of parastomal hernias, the implantation of IPST-R or IPST mesh has proven to be efficient, easy to handle, and very safe. In particular, the low recurrence rate of 4.8%, which is in line with the current literature, is convincing. However, a larger number of patients would improve the validity of the results.
Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Polivinilos , Adulto , Recurrencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Polímeros de FluorocarbonoAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Hernia Incisional , Recurrencia , Humanos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Femenino , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses confirm that the use of a prophylactic mesh does not significantly reduce the parastomal hernia rate. Data about the benefits of these meshes concerning the symptoms of parastomal hernia are lacking in the existing literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a post hoc analysis of the patients presenting parastomal hernia from the GRECCAR 7 (Groupe de recherche sur la chirurgie du cancer du rectum) randomized clinical trials cohort on whether the presence or the absence of the mesh influenced the symptoms, the quality of life, and complications of patients with parastomal hernias. DESIGN: We studied the parastomal hernia-related symptoms among the 2 groups of the GRECCAR 7 randomized clinical trial, with or without prophylactic mesh at the time of the index surgery. SETTINGS: Data were retrospectively extracted and analyzed from the GRECCAR 7 database. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with a parastomal hernia during the 2 years of the GRECCAR 7 study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Several prospectively collected data about the symptoms were studied among this population. We also studied the average interval between parastomal hernia repair surgery and both index surgery and diagnosis of parastomal hernia. RESULTS: Among the 199 patients included in the GRECCAR study, 36 patients (35.6%) in the nonmesh group and 33 patients (33.7%) in the mesh group were diagnosed with clinical and/or radiological parastomal hernia at 2-year follow-up, without a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.89). None of the studied symptoms showed any statistically significant difference between the groups. LIMITATIONS: This study relies on a relatively small number of patients, and although data were prospectively collected, we lacked some details about the categorization of parastomal hernias. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the use of a prosthetic mesh in a sublay position to prevent parastomal hernia in terminal end colostomy patients should no longer be recommended. See Video Abstract . EFECTO DE LA MALLA PREVENTIVA RETROMUSCULAR PARA COLOSTOMA TERMINAL CON RESPECTO A LOS SNTOMAS Y LA CALIDAD DE VIDA EN PACIENTES CON HERNIA PARAESTOMAL UN ANLISIS POSTHOC DE LA COHORTE GRECCAR: ANTECEDENTES:Los recientes metaanálisis y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados confirman que el uso de una malla profiláctica no reduce significativamente la tasa de hernia paraestomal. En la literatura existente faltan datos sobre los beneficios de estas mallas en relación con los síntomas de la hernia paraestomal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar un análisis post-hoc de los pacientes que presentaron hernia paraestomal de la cohorte de 7 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados GRECCAR sobre si la presencia o ausencia de la malla influyó en los síntomas, la calidad de vida y las complicaciones de los pacientes con hernias paraestomales.DISEÑO:Estudiamos los síntomas relacionados con la hernia paraestomal entre los dos grupos del ensayo clínico aleatorizado GRECCAR 7, con o sin malla profiláctica en el momento de la cirugía índice.AJUSTES:Los datos fueron extraídos y analizados de manera retrospectiva de la base de datos GRECCAR 7.PACIENTES:Pacientes diagnosticados con hernia paraestomal durante los dos años del estudio GRECCAR 7.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron varios datos recopilados de manera prospectiva sobre los síntomas en esta población. También estudiamos el intervalo promedio entre la cirugía reparadora de la hernia paraestomal así como también la cirugía índice como el diagnóstico de la hernia paraestomal.RESULTADOS:De entre los 199 pacientes incluidos en el estudio GRECCAR, 36 pacientes (35,6%) fueron diagnosticados con hernia paraestomal de manera clínica y/o radiológica en el grupo sin malla a los 2 años de seguimiento y 33 (33,7%) en el grupo con malla, sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa ( p = 0,89). Ninguno de los síntomas estudiados mostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio se basa en un número relativamente pequeño de pacientes y, aunque los datos fueron recopilados de forma prospectiva, nos faltaron algunos detalles sobre la categorización de las hernias paraestomales.CONCLUSIONES:Creemos que ya no se debe recomendar el uso de una malla protésica en posición retromuscular para prevenir la hernia paraestomal en pacientes con colostomía terminal. (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).
Asunto(s)
Colostomía , Calidad de Vida , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Colostomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Hernia Ventral/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common and challenging complication after stoma creation, with an estimated 50% incidence 2 years after the index surgery. Mesh repair is the treatment of choice. Laparoscopic and/or robotic approaches allow acceptable outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review from January 2012 to November 2023 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus search were performed to select articles dealing with minimally invasive surgical treatment for PSH after end colostomy. RESULTS: 603 studies were found, and 24 were chosen. When compared to open surgery, laparoscopy showed decreased postoperative complications and recurrence. The main laparoscopic approaches are the keyhole (KH), the Sugarbaker (SB), and the sandwich technique. Continuous improvement in surgery, mesh technology, and surgeons' expertise led to an amelioration of surgical outcome and recurrence rate after repair. Recent studies showed comparable outcomes for SB and KH techniques, while novel surgical approaches have been proposed in an attempt to further increase the operative and long-term results. Reports on PSH robotic repairs are scarce and describe small series results, suggesting a role of the initial learning curve as a risk factor for complications. CONCLUSION: End-colostomy PSH surgical repair still represents a challenge for surgeons. Recent evidence has not shown a significant advantage in postoperative complications and recurrence with a specific repair among SB, KH, and sandwich technique. The paucity of data on robotic surgery does not allow to draw definitive conclusion. Further primary, multicentric, and larger cohort studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Colostomía , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Parastomal hernias are a common and challenging problem with high rates of wound complications and hernia recurrence after repair. We present our approach to optimizing parastomal hernia repair through preoperative preparation, surgical approach, and postoperative management. METHODS: Patients are carefully evaluated and optimized prior to surgery. Our typical surgical approach involves a generous midline laparotomy and retrorectus dissection followed by a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release. We typically utilize a Sugarbaker technique for retromuscular mesh placement but also use the retromuscular keyhole or cruciate technique if there is insufficient bowel length. RESULTS: Previously published results from our institution include wound complication rates of up to 16% after open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair. Stoma-specific complications, such as mesh erosion in the bowel, may be attributed to the mesh placement techniques. Hernia recurrence rates range from 11 to 30% up to 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We prefer an open retromuscular approach with a Sugarbaker mesh configuration to treat complex parastomal hernias. However, wound morbidity and repair failure rates remain high, and additional research is needed to optimize surgical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cuidados PosoperatoriosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PH) stands out as a prevalent complication following end colostomies, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Various surgical strategies, predominantly involving prophylactic mesh deployment, have been explored with variable outcomes. This study details our experience and mid-term outcomes utilizing a funnel-shaped mesh. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational study examined consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery with end colostomy, incorporating a 3D-funnel mesh from January 2019 to December 2021 (PM group). A historical cohort of patients with end colostomy without prophylactic mesh served as the comparison (C group). Postoperative morbidity within 30 days was documented, and clinical examinations and radiological tests were employed for parastomal hernia diagnosis during follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients participated, with thirty-four in the PM group and thirty-eight in the C group. The PM group experienced 16 postoperative complications, unrelated to the mesh, while the C group recorded 20 complications (p = 0.672). Median follow-up was 22.06 months for the PM group and 63.18 months for the C group. The PM group exhibited a lower parastomal hernia incidence during follow-up (8.8%) compared to the C group(68.4%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of a 3D-funnel mesh appears effective in reducing parastomal hernia incidence in the short and mid-term, without an associated increase in postoperative morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Colostomía , Hernia Incisional , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Herniorrafia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ventral hernia (VH) is a common surgical disease. Previous studies suggested that obesity is an important risk factor for VH. However, the causal relationship between fat distribution and the risk of VH is still unclear. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate their causal relationship. METHODS: We used the body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and body fat mass to represent general obesity and utilized the volume of abdominal subcutaneous adiposity tissue, visceral adiposity tissue, waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio to represent abdominal adiposity. The data were extracted from the large-scale genome-wide association study of European ancestry. We used two-sample MR to infer causality, using multivariate MR to correct the effects of confounding factors. RESULTS: Increased BMI, body fat percentage, body fat mass, visceral adiposity tissue, waist circumference, and hip circumference rather than subcutaneous adiposity tissue or waist-to-hip ratio, were causally associated with a higher risk of VH. The results of multivariate MR suggested that body fat percentage was causally associated with a higher risk of VH after adjusting for body mass index, diabetes, and smoking. CONCLUSION: General obesity, increased visceral adiposity tissue, waist circumference, and hip circumference rather than subcutaneous adiposity tissue or the waist-to-hip ratio were causally associated with a higher risk of VH. These findings provided a deeper understanding of the role that the distribution of adiposity plays in the mechanism of VH.
Asunto(s)
Adiposidad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Hernia Ventral , Obesidad , Humanos , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Relación Cintura-Cadera , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Circunferencia de la Cintura , AdultoAsunto(s)
Colostomía , Hernia Incisional , Isquemia , Proctectomía , Humanos , Colostomía/métodos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Proctectomía/métodos , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Isquemia/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. Secondary aims were the identification of risk factors for PH and to compare the health-related quality of life (QOL) between patients with and without PH. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records combined with cross-sectional administration of the QOL instrument and telephone follow-up. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study sample comprised 219 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit for urothelial cancer between February 2014 and December 2018. The study setting was Peking University First Hospital (Beijing, China). METHODS: Demographic and pertinent clinical data, including development of PH, were gathered via the retrospective review of medical records. Participants were also asked to complete the traditional Chinese language version of the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (C-COH). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify the effect of PH on C-COH scores. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PH development. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR = 21-48), 43 of 219 (19.63%) patients had developed a PH. A body mass index (BMI) indicating overweight (OR = 3.548; 95% CI, 1.562-8.061; P = .002), a prior history of hernia (OR = 5.147; 95% CI, 1.195-22.159; P = .028), and chronic high abdominal pressure postdischarge (CHAP-pd) (OR = 3.197; 95% CI, 1.445-7.075; P = .004) were predictors of PH after operation. There was no significant difference between C-COH scores of patients with or without PH. No significant differences were found when participants with PH were compared to those without PH on 4 factors of the C-COH: physical scores (ß= .347, P = .110), psychological scores (ß= .316, P = .070), spiritual scores (ß=-.125, P = .714), and social scores (ß= .054, P = .833). CONCLUSION: Parastomal hernia is prevalent in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion. Overweight, hernia history, and CHAP-pd were predictors of PH development. No significant differences in QOL were found when patients with PH were compared to those without PH.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Derivación Urinaria , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Incidencia , Cuidados Posteriores , Estudios Transversales , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/epidemiología , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Alta del Paciente , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos , Cistectomía , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obesity is known to increase the likelihood of developing abdominal wall hernias, body mass index (BMI) alone does not provide detailed information about the amount and location of body fat. The aim of this study was to investigate the link between various adipose tissue parameters and the incidence of incisional hernias (IHs), as well as the outcomes of hernia repair. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature to examine the relationship between various body fat parameters and the occurrence of IHs after abdominal surgeries, as well as the outcomes of hernia repair. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included for analysis. Eight trials evaluated the IH development after abdominal surgeries via specific fat parameters, and five studies evaluated the postoperative outcomes after IH repair. The findings of this study suggest that an increase in visceral fat volume (VFA or VFV) and subcutaneous fat (SFA or SFV) are linked to a higher incidence of IHs after abdominal surgeries. Higher levels of VFV or VFA were associated with more challenging fascia closure and greater postoperative recurrence rates following repair. Whereas BMI did not demonstrate a significant association. CONCLUSION: Measuring visceral and subcutaneous fat composition preoperatively can be a useful tool for assessing the risk of IH, and is more reliable than BMI. Elevated levels of these fat parameters have been linked to increased recurrence of IH following hernia repair, as well as the use of complex surgical techniques during repair.
Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Hernia Incisional , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Índice de Masa Corporal , Incidencia , Grasa Intraabdominal , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tejido Adiposo , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Grasa SubcutáneaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the use of a modified laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernia technique, called "D-Type parastomal hernia repair surgery" which combines abdominal wall and extraperitoneal stoma reconstruction, in patients with parastomal hernia (PSH) following colorectal stoma surgery. The aim was to determine whether D-type parastomal hernia repair surgery is a promising surgical approach compared to the traditional laparoscopic repair technique (Sugarbaker method) for patients with PSH. METHODS: PSH patients were selected and retrospectively divided into two groups: the study group underwent D-type parastomal hernia repair, while the control group underwent laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair. Clinical data from both groups were analyzed. RESULT: Compared to control group (n = 68), the study group undergoing D-type stoma lateral hernia repair had significant increase in total operative time (98.82 ± 12.37 min vs 124.61 ± 34.99 min, p < 0.001). The study group also showed better postoperative stoma bowel function scores in sensory ability, frequency of bowel movements, and clothing cleanliness without a stoma bag (p = 0.037, 0.001, 0.002). The treatment cost was significantly higher in the control group (3899.97 ± 260.00$ vs 3215.91 ± 230.03$, p < 0.001). The postoperative recurrence rate in the control group was 26.4%, while in the study group, it was 4.3%, with a significant statistical difference (p = 0.024). In terms of long-term postoperative complications, the study group had an overall lower incidence compared to the control group (p = 0.035). Other parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that D-type parastomal hernia repair surgery is a safe and feasible procedure. Compared to traditional surgery, it can reduce the recurrence of lateral hernia, improve postoperative stoma bowel function, and save medical resources.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Laparoscopía , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Colostomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/complicaciones , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Abdominal surgeries are common surgical procedures worldwide. Incisional hernias commonly develop after abdominal wall surgery. Surgery is the definite treatment for most incisional hernias but carries a higher rate of complications. Although frequently used, the real benefit of using drain tubes to reduce surgical complications after incisional hernia repair is uncertain. METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies that compared the outcomes of drain vs. no-drain placement and the risk of complications in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Primary endpoints were infection, seroma formation, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: From a total of 771 studies, we included 2 RCTs and 4 non-RCTs. A total of 40,325 patients were included, of which 28 497 (71%) patients used drain tubes, and 11 828 (29%) had no drains. The drain group had a significantly higher infection rate (OR 1.89; CI 1.13-3.16; P = 0.01) and mean length of hospital stay (Mean Difference-MD 2.66; 95% CI 0.81-4.52; P = 0.005). There was no difference in seroma formation and the readmission rate. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive systematic meta-analysis concluded that drain tube placement after incisional hernia repair is associated with increased infection rate and length of hospital stay without affecting the rate of seroma formation and readmission rate. Prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Humanos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Seroma/etiología , Seroma/prevención & control , Mallas QuirúrgicasRESUMEN
AIM: A significant proportion of stoma patients develop a parastomal hernia (PSH), with reported rates varying widely from 5% to 50% due to heterogeneity in the definition and mode of diagnosis. PSHs are symptomatic in 75% of these patients, causing a significant impact on quality of life due to issues with appliance fitting, leakage, skin excoriation and pain. They can also lead to emergency presentations with strangulation and obstruction. Evidence is lacking on how to select patients for surgical intervention or conservative treatment. In those who do undergo surgery, the best operation for a particular patient or PSH is not always clear and many options exist. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an individual patient's PSH treatment on their subsequent self-reported outcomes including treatment success and quality of life. METHODS: This is a prospective international cohort study of PSH treatment, including both operative and non-operative interventions. A global network of clinicians and specialist nurses will recruit 1000-1500 patients and centralize detailed information, their individual background and their PSH treatment, as well as short-term outcomes up to 30 days. Patients will then provide their own outcomes data including quality of life and whether their treatment was successful, via a secure online system, at 3, 6 and 12 months. PROPHER will be run in two phases: an internal pilot phase of at least 10 hospitals from up to five countries, and a main phase of up to 200 hospitals from across the European Society of Coloproctology network. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a wealth of contemporaneous information which will improve our ability to counsel patients and facilitate improved selection of appropriate and personalized interventions for those with a PSH.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of vTAPP for small/M3W1 hernias compared to IPOM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively recruited group of patients. Study objects were patients undergoing ventral laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (vTAPP) for primary Midline/Lateral Small hernias up to 2 cm. The control group comprised patients after IPOM procedure. RESULTS: We analyzed 179 patients: vTAPP (n=132) and IPOM groups (n=47). The vTAPP group was characterized by significantly shorter hospitals-stay (Q1-Q3: 8-70 hours, p<0.001), fewer relapses (n=2, p=0.047) and slightly longer surgery (Q1-Q3: 40-80 min, p=0.037). Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed 3.39 times more profitable vTAPP compared to IPOM. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair is a safe and effective method not requiring special tools and consumables. This approach is applicable as an outpatient (or <24h hospital-stay) method.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hernia Ventral/diagnóstico , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , HospitalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Traumatic lumbar hernias are a rare entity mostly seen with high-impact, blunt abdominal trauma. This injury occurs when there is disruption of the posterior musculature along with bony structures, allowing for herniation of abdominal contents. There are minimal cases of this entity reported in adults, but even fewer in the pediatric population. METHODS: We describe 3 cases of traumatic lumbar hernia at our institution as well as provide a review of the literature to elucidate the most common mechanisms, severity of injury, and associated injuries. RESULTS: Traumatic lumbar hernia is most commonly seen in restrained passengers involved in motor vehicle collisions. A majority of cases are diagnosed using computed tomography imaging and less frequently during primary surgical exploration. The most common associated injuries were mesenteric and bowel injuries, followed by spinal and chest trauma. Traumatic lumbar hernia often leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased need for posthospital rehabilitation because of associated traumatic comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic lumbar hernia is a rare entity in children, and early suspicion and identification of associated injuries is necessary in the management of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Hernia Ventral , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Accidentes de TránsitoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retromuscular drains are commonly placed during retromuscular hernia repair (RHR) to decrease postoperative wound complications and help mesh in-growth. Drains are traditionally removed when output is low but the relationship between drain output at the time of removal and postoperative complications has yet to be delineated. This study aimed to investigate outcomes of RHR patients with drain removal at either high or low output volume. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review evaluated adult patients undergoing open RHR with retromuscular drain placement between 2013 and 2022 at a single academic medical center. Patients were stratified into low output drainage (LOD, < 50 mL/day) or high output drainage (HOD, ≥ 50 mL/day) groups based on volume on the day of drain removal. RESULTS: We identified 336 patients meeting inclusion criteria: 58% LOD (n = 195) and 42% HOD (n = 141). Demographics and risk factors pertaining to hernia complexity were similar between cohorts. Low-drain output at the time of removal was associated with a significantly longer drain duration (6.3 ± 4.5 vs. 4.4 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (5.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.8 ± 2.8 days, p < 0.001). With a 97% 30-day follow-up, incidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) was not statistically different between groups (29.2% LOD, 26.2% HOD, p = 0.63). Surgical site infection and SSO requiring procedural intervention was also not statistically significant between cohort. At 1-year follow-up, hernia recurrence rates were the same between groups (4.2% LOD, 1.4% HOD, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Following open ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement, the rate of postoperative wound complications was not statistically different based on volume of drain output day of removal. These results suggest that removing drains earlier despite higher output is safe and has no effect on short- or long-term hernia outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Adulto , Humanos , Drenaje , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are associated with a reduced quality of life. Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall is the current standard for incisional hernia repair (IHR), since it reduces the risk of recurrence. The best position for the mesh remains controversial, and each position has advantages and disadvantages. OBJECTIVE: In this nationwide population-based study, we aimed to determine whether IHR with intraperitoneal mesh is associated with an increased risk of bowel obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the French hospital database (PMSI), which collects data from all public and private hospitals, two patient cohorts were created and compared. Patients having undergone a laparoscopic IHR with intraperitoneal mesh (IPOM) in 2013 or 2014 due to a laparotomy performed in the 4 previous years were the IPOM group. Patients hospitalized for any other acute disease (i.e., without IHR) in 2013 and 2014, but having a similar laparotomy in the 4 previous years were the control group. Both cohorts were followed until 2019 in search of any episode of bowel obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 815 patients were included in the IPOM group and matched to 1630 control patients. The 5 year bowel obstruction rate was 7.36% in the IPOM group and 4.42% in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment on age and obesity, incisional hernia repair with laparoscopic IPOM increased the risk of bowel obstruction in the 5 years following surgery (HR = 1.712; 95% CI 1.208-2.427; p = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients having undergone laparoscopic IPOM have an increased risk of bowel obstruction compared with patients who have a similar surgical history but no IHR.