Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 825
Filtrar
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 18560, 2024 08 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122869

RESUMEN

The treatment of parastomal hernias (PSH) represents a major challenge in hernia surgery. Various techniques have been reported with different outcomes in terms of complication and recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to share our initial experience with the implantation of the DynaMesh-IPST-R and -IPST, intraperitoneal funnel meshes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated for PSH between March 2019 and April 2023 using the chimney technique with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R or IPST. The primary outcome was recurrence and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, the latter assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 21 consecutive patients were treated with intraperitoneal PVDF funnel meshes, 17 with IPST-R and 4 with IPST. There were no intraoperative complications. Overall, no complications occurred in 61.9% (n = 12) of the patients. Major postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were noted in four cases (19.0%). During the mean follow-up period of 21.6 (range 4.8-37.5) months, one patient (4.8%) had a recurrence. In conclusion, for the treatment of parastomal hernias, the implantation of IPST-R or IPST mesh has proven to be efficient, easy to handle, and very safe. In particular, the low recurrence rate of 4.8%, which is in line with the current literature, is convincing. However, a larger number of patients would improve the validity of the results.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Polivinilos , Adulto , Recurrencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Polímeros de Fluorocarbono
2.
Biomolecules ; 14(8)2024 Jul 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39199309

RESUMEN

Mesh-augmented hernia repair is the gold standard in abdominal wall and hiatal/diaphragmatic hernia management and ranks among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons. However, it is associated with a series of drawbacks, including recurrence, mesh infection, and adhesion formation. To address these weaknesses, numerous biomaterials have been investigated for mesh coating. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous agent that promotes tissue healing through numerous cytokines and growth factors. In addition, many reports highlight its contribution to better integration of different types of coated meshes, compared to conventional uncoated meshes. The use of PRP-coated meshes for hernia repair has been reported in the literature, but a review of technical aspects and outcomes is missing. The aim of this comprehensive review is to report the experimental studies investigating the synergistic use of PRP and mesh implants in hernia animal models. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus without chronological constraints. In total, fourteen experimental and three clinical studies have been included. Among experimental trials, synthetic, biologic, and composite meshes were used in four, nine, and one study, respectively. In synthetic meshes, PRP-coating leads to increased antioxidant levels and collaged deposition, reduced oxidative stress, and improved inflammatory response, while studies on biological meshes revealed increased neovascularization and tissue integration, reduced inflammation, adhesion severity, and mechanical failure rates. Finally, PRP-coating of composite meshes results in reduced adhesions and improved mechanical strength. Despite the abundance of preclinical data, there is a scarcity of clinical studies, mainly due to the absence of an established protocol regarding PRP preparation and application. To this point in time, PRP has been used as a coating agent for the repair of abdominal and diaphragmatic hernias, as well as for mesh fixation. Clinical application of conclusions drawn from experimental studies may lead to improved results in hernia repair.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas/metabolismo , Humanos , Animales , Cicatrización de Heridas
3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15389, 2024 07 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965256

RESUMEN

The objective was to explore the efficacy of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure using double-modified hernia needles with hydrodissection (SLPEC group) and two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (TLPEC group) for the treatment of giant indirect inguinal hernias in children. We performed a retrospective review of all children with giant indirect inguinal hernias (inner ring orifice diameter ≥ 1.5 cm) who underwent laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac at FuJian Children's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. We collected data from the medical records of all the children and analysed their clinical characteristics and operation-related and follow-up information. Overall, this study included a cohort of 219 patients with isolated giant inguinal hernias who had complete clinical data and who had undergone laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac at our centre. All procedures were successfully performed for the 106 patients who underwent SLPEC and for the 113 patients who underwent TLPEC at our centre. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, body weight, follow-up time or the side of inguinal hernia between the SLPEC group and the TLPEC group (P = 0.123, 0.613, 0.121, 0.076 and 0.081, respectively). However, there were significant differences in the bleeding volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative activity time between the two groups (P ≤ 0.001). The operation times in the TLPEC group were significantly longer than those in the SLPEC group (P = 0.048), but there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay or hospitalization costs between the two groups (P = 0.244 and 0.073, respectively). Incision scars were found in 2 patients in the SLPEC group and 9 patients in the TLPEC group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.04). However, the incidence of ipsilateral hernia recurrence, surgical site infection, suture-knot reactions and chronic inguinodynia did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = 0.332, 0.301, 0.332 and 0.599, respectively). Postoperative hydrocele occurred in only 1 male child in the SLPEC group and in no male children in the TLPEC group, and there was no difference between the two groups (P = 0.310). In this study, there were no cases of testicular atrophy or iatrogenic ascent of the testis. Compared with the TLPEC group, the SLPEC group had the advantages of a concealed incision, light scarring, minimal invasiveness, a reduced operation time, minimal bleeding, mild pain and rapid recovery. In conclusion, SLPEC using double-modified hernia needles with hydrodissection and high ligation of the hernia sac is a safe, effective and minimally invasive surgery. The cosmetic results are impressive, and the follow-up results are promising.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Masculino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Niño , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Agujas , Lactante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
4.
Surg Endosc ; 38(9): 5413-5421, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of midline ventral hernias complicated by concomitant diastasis recti presents a significant clinical challenge. The Endoscopic Onlay Repair (ENDOR) offers a minimally invasive solution, effectively addressing both conditions. This study focuses on describing the adaptation of ENDOR to a robotic platform, termed R-ENDOR, aiming to report initial outcomes along with other established robotic surgical approaches. METHODS: This retrospective case series study included consecutive adult patients who underwent R-ENDOR approach from October 2018 to April 2023, performed by a single surgeon. A comprehensive description of the surgical technique is included. Patient demographics, operative, and hernia-specific characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes are described. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients undergoing R-ENDOR for ventral hernia repair with diastasis recti plication were included. The median age was 59 years (IQR 42-63), with 60% (n = 9) female patients. The majority (86%, n = 13) had an ASA score of ≤ 2, and the median BMI was 24 kg/m2, with 20% (n = 3) classified as obese. Median hernia size was 2 cm (IQR 2-2.25), with a median diastasis length of 19 cm (IQR 15-21.5) and width of 4 cm (IQR 3-6). The median operative time was 129 min (IQR 113-166). Most repairs (93%, n = 14) were reinforced with mesh, predominantly self-fixating (73.3%, n = 11). Eighty percent of patients (n = 12) were discharged on the same day, with a median follow-up of 153 days (IQR 55-309). Notable complications included clinically significant seromas in 20% of patients (n = 3), long-term hypoesthesia in 40% (n = 6), and readmission in one patient (6.6%) for surgical site infection (SSI) requiring IV antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Midline ventral hernias associated to diastasis recti can be managed robotically by ENDOR with safe and consistent 90-day outcomes in a carefully selected group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tempo Operativo , Recto del Abdomen/cirugía
5.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1337-1344, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902558

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of biological graft in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has been controversial, and there is a lack of high-level evidence to confirm the value of biological graft in LIHR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel composite biologics in LIHR. METHODS: A multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was designed. Fifty patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to the experimental and control group (1:1). The experimental group was repaired with a non-crosslinked composite extracellular matrix from porcine urinary bladder matrix and small intestinal submucosa (UBM/SIS). The control group was repaired with a lightweight, large-pore, synthetic mesh. The primary endpoint was the effectiveness rate of hernia repair. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for four years. No significant difference was found between the experimental group and the control group in the effective rate of hernia repair (24/24[100%] vs 21/22[95.45%], RR, 0.4667; 95%CI, 0.3294-2.304; P = 0.4783). There was no fever, seroma, infection, groin pain, foreign body discomfort or recurrence in the experimental group during the follow-up. In the control group, there were 2 cases of seroma 14 days after operation, 1 case of groin discomfort 60 days after operation and one case of recurrence 410 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Compared with the lightweight synthetic mesh, the novel UBM/SIS graft has comparable short-term and medium-term effectiveness in LIHR, and the incidence of postoperative complications such as seroma groin discomfort is lower. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR1800020173.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico
6.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1461-1465, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907879

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an Endoscope Manipulator Robot (EMARO). METHODS: This retrospective study included 51 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. The transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) has been used to treat inguinal hernias. The patients were divided into two groups: one group underwent laparoscopic surgery using EMARO (E-TAPP) and the other group underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (L-TAPP). The EMARO is a pneumatically driven endoscope-holder robot. The surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent E-TAPP, and 36 underwent L-TAPP. The L-TAPP operation requires two personnel, whereas E-TAPP can be performed by one surgeon. The median operation times of the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups were 81 min (range, 77-87) and 70 min (range, 60-94), respectively, and the median blood loss was 5 mL (range, 1-5) and 2 mL (range, 1-5). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The setup time for EMARO was approximately 8 min (range, 5-12). No patient experienced recurrence, and the postoperative complication rates were similar between the two groups. The number of patients who used postoperative analgesics in the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups was four (n = 15) and 22 (n = 36), respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery using EMARO can reduce labor costs and postoperative pain. The surgical outcomes of the E-TAPP group were not inferior to those of the L-TAPP group, and E-TAPP could also be safely performed.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Anciano , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
7.
J Int Med Res ; 52(6): 3000605241257418, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844780

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) technique compared with the traditional three-port total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique for inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: This prospective, randomised study involved patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia at our hospital from December 2021 to July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to SIL-TEP or TEP groups based on a computer-generated random number table. Perioperative clinical indicators for the surgical approaches were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients eligible for study, 66 were randomised to the SIL-TEP group and 61 to the TEP group. The operation time for SIL-TEP was significantly longer than for TEP but the time to return to normal activities was significantly shorter and short-term pain score was significantly lower. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, pain relief time, hospitalization costs or cosmetic satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: While SIL-TEP is more challenging than TEP for hernia repair, we found that at our centre it is comparable with regard to overall safety and feasibility. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Tempo Operativo , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
8.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 34(8): 762-769, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38900701

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the application value, feasibility, and safety of modified single-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia. Methods: One hundred and twenty cases of children with indirect inguinal hernia admitted from 2017 to 2022 were enrolled in the Control and Observation groups, with 80 and 40 cases, respectively. They underwent traditional open high ligation of the hernia sac and modified single-port laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac, respectively. The operation duration, surgical incision size, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, first ambulation time, and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups, as well as the incidence of surgical complications in the two groups. Results: The surgical incision size, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, and first ambulation time of the Observation group were less than those of the Control group. There was no significant difference in operation duration or hospitalization expenses between the two groups. Only two cases in the Observation group showed suture knot reactions after surgery, with no incision infection, inguinal hematoma, iatrogenic cryptorchidism, etc. The overall incidence of complications in the Observation group was lower than that of the Control group. Conclusion: Modified single-port laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia in children has the advantages of minimal invasiveness, and enhanced recovery, along with fewer complications and recurrence, hence it is worthy of recommendation in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Niño , Lactante , Estudios de Factibilidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tempo Operativo , Agujas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Ligadura/métodos
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12773, 2024 06 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834636

RESUMEN

The use of fibrin glue for inguinal hernia mesh fixation has been suggested to be effective in preventing hematomas and reducing postoperative pain compared to tacks and sutures.. The effect of fibrin glue can vary significantly based on the device used. This study assessed the efficacy of fibrin glue based on the type of devices used in an ex vivo system. The rabbit's abdominal wall was trimmed to a size of 3.0 × 6.0 cm and was secured at the edges with metal fixtures. To measure the maximum tensile strength at the point of adhesion failure, the hernia mesh was fixed to the rabbit's abdominal wall using fibrin glue in a 2 cm square area, left for 3 min, and then pulled at a speed of 50 cm/min. The test was conducted 10 times for each group. The median (minimum-maximum) tensile strength values using the spraying, two-liquid mixing, and sequential layering methods were 3.58 (1.99-4.95), 0.51 (0.27-1.89), and 1.32 (0.63-1.66) N, respectively. The spraying method had predominantly higher tensile strength values than the two-liquid mixing and sequential layering methods (P < 0.01). In conclusion, in hernia mesh fixation, the spraying method can be adopted to achieve appropriate adhesive effects.


Asunto(s)
Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina , Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Resistencia a la Tracción , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Animales , Conejos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Adhesivos Tisulares/farmacología , Pared Abdominal/cirugía
10.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1293-1307, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691265

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Experimental data show that large-pored meshes reduce foreign body reaction, inflammation and scar bridging and thus improve mesh integration. However, clinical data on the effect of mesh porosity on the outcome of hernioplasty are limited. This study investigated the relation of pore size in polypropylene meshes to the outcome of Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty using data from the Herniamed registry. METHODS: This analysis of data from the Herniamed registry evaluated perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes in patients undergoing elective, primary, unilateral Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair using polypropylene meshes. Patients operated with a non-polypropylene mesh or a polypropylene mesh with absorbable components were excluded. Polypropylene meshes with a pore size of 1.0 × 1.0 mm or less were defined as small-pored meshes, while a pore size of more than 1.0 × 1.0 mm was considered large-pored. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable analyses were performed to investigate the relation of pore size of polypropylene meshes, patient and surgical characteristics to the outcome parameters. RESULTS: Data from 22,141 patients were analyzed, of which 6853 (31%) were operated on with a small-pore polypropylene mesh and 15,288 (69%) with a large-pore polypropylene mesh. No association of mesh pore size with intraoperative, general or postoperative complications, recurrence rate or pain requiring treatment was found at 1-year follow-up. A lower risk of complication-related reoperation tended to be associated with small-pore size (p = 0.086). Furthermore, small-pore mesh repair was associated with a lower risk of pain at rest and pain on exertion at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study could not demonstrate an advantage of large-pore polypropylene meshes for the outcome of Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Polipropilenos , Sistema de Registros , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Porosidad , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Recurrencia
11.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (5): 86-94, 2024.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785243

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of using fluoropolymer-coated mesh during intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernia repair in patients with primary ventral hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, non-randomized, controlled clinical study included 88 patients of both sexes who were operated on using a laparoscopic approach using the IPOM technique for a primary ventral hernia. The duration of observation ranged from 3 to 12 months. In the main group, 48 patients received fluoropolymer-coated meshes (Ftorex). A comparison was made with a retrospective group of 40 patients who were treated with anti-adhesive collagen-coated meshes (Parietene composite, Parietex Composite, Symbotex). RESULTS: The number of early and late postoperative complications in the groups did not have significant differences, at the same time, their number was lower in the group of patients in whom fluoropolymer-coated meshes were used. Most of the complications corresponded to Clavien-Dindo class I and II and did not pose a significant threat to health. There were no recurrences of hernias observed in patients included in the study. There were slightly more adhesions in the fluoropolymer-coated mesh group (35.4% vs. 25.0% in the collagen-coated mesh group). The quality of life of patients in the study groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: In laparoscopic IPOM hernia repair fluoropolymer-coated meshes are not inferior in effectiveness and safety to traditionally used collagen-coated meshes and can be recommended for use in patients with primary ventral hernias.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Polímeros de Fluorocarbono , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Federación de Rusia , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Surg Res ; 300: 141-149, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810527

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is increasingly being performed for reconstruction of complex incisional and recurrent ventral hernias, with complication rates ranging from 17.4% to 33.3% after open TAR (oTAR) or robotic TAR (rTAR). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing TAR with macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPM) and to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR. METHODS: A retrospective review of 183 consecutive patients undergoing TAR with MPM performed by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Patients with less than one year of follow-up were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between oTAR and rTAR patients. RESULTS: Average patient age was 59.4 y, median body mass index was 33.2 kg/m2, and median hernia width was 12.0 cm. Forty 2 (23%) patients underwent oTAR, 127 (69%) underwent rTAR, and 14 (8%) underwent laparoscopic TAR. Patients experienced 16.4%, 10.4%, 3.8%, and 6.0% rates of overall complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, and other complications, respectively. At average follow-up of 2.3 y, a 2.7% hernia recurrence rate was observed. In comparison to patients undergoing oTAR, rTAR patients required shorter operative times and length of stay, and were less likely to experience postoperative complications overall, and other complications. Recurrence rates were similar between oTAR and rTAR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TAR with MPM experienced complication and recurrence rates in alignment with previously published results. In comparison to oTAR, rTAR was associated with more favorable perioperative outcomes and complication rates, but similar recurrence rates.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales , Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Polipropilenos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Recurrencia , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos
13.
Surg Innov ; 31(4): 424-434, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803124

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hernia meshes are used to reduce recurrence and pain rates, but the rates are still high. This could be improved with coatings of the mesh. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of mesh coatings used to promote healing in abdominal hernia repair and to report beneficial and unbeneficial effects. METHODS: We included human and animal studies with abdominal hernias that were repaired with non-commercially coated meshes. We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central, LILACS, and CNKI without language constraints. RESULTS: Of 2933 identified studies, 58 were included: six studies had a total of 408 humans and 52 studies had 2679 animals. The median follow-up was 12 months (range 1-156), and 95% of the hernias were incisional. There were 44 different coatings which included platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells, growth factors, vitamin E, collagen-derived products, various polysaccharides, silk proteins, chitosan, gentamycin, doxycycline, nitrofurantoin, titanium, and diamond-like carbon. Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma were the most researched. Mesenchymal stem cells notably reduced inflammation and foreign body reactions but did not impact other healing metrics. In contrast, platelet-rich plasma positively influenced tissue ingrowth, collagen deposition, and neovascularization and had varying effects on inflammation and foreign body reactions. CONCLUSION: We identified 44 different mesh coatings and they showed varying results. Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma were the most studied, with the latter showing considerable promise in improving biomechanical properties in hernia repair. Further investigations are needed to ascertain their definitive use in humans.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Abdominal , Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Animales , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/química
14.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 34(3): 330-333, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752657

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robotic ventral hernia repair has been increasing globally, with comparable outcomes to laparoscopic repair and lower rates of conversion to open surgery. Robotic surgery is increasing in popularity, and there is a number of new robotic systems entering the marketing. We report the first case of a Roboic eTEP using the Versius robotic system in a patient with an incisional hernia. METHODS: Surgery was performed using the Versius system from CMR surgical which consists of bedside units for each instrument and a console. The patient presented with an incisional hernia measuring 9.5×5 cm in the left flank. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2 with a drain. There was no need for opioids. The drain was removed at POD 7. The patient presented at POD 10 with erythema and cellulitis in the area that previously had tape on it, and it was resolved with a short course of oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The eTEP technique for hernia surgery was safe and feasible using the Versius robotic system. Implementation is possible in experienced hands with minimal changes to the surgical techniques.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Hernia Incisional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
15.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 16(20): 25686-25697, 2024 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739862

RESUMEN

Polypropylene (PP) mesh is commonly used in repairing abdominal wall hernia (AWH). However, the use of synthetic prosthesis comes with the risk of developing a prosthetic infection, resulting in delayed healing, secondary surgery, and potentially increased mortality. To address these issues, a facile surface functionalization strategy for PP mesh based on phytic acid (PA) and polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG) was constructed through a one-step co-deposition process, referred to as the PA/PHMG coating. The development of PA/PHMG coating is mainly attributed to the surface affinity of PA and the electrostatic interactions between PA and PHMG. The PA/PHMG coating could be completed within 4 h under mild conditions. The prepared PA/PHMG coatings on PP mesh surfaces exhibited desirable biocompatibility toward mammalian cells and excellent antibacterial properties against the notorious "superbug" methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli (TRE). The PA/PHMG-coated PP meshes showed killing ratios of over 99% against MRSA in an infected abdominal wall hernia repair model. Furthermore, histological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed a significantly attenuated degree of neutrophil infiltration in the PA/PHMG coating group, attributed to the decreased bacterial numbers alleviating the inflammatory response at the implant sites. Meanwhile, the pristine PP and PA/PHMG-coated meshes showed effective tissue repair, with the PA/PHMG coating group exhibiting enhanced angiogenesis compared with pristine PP meshes, suggesting superior tissue restoration. Additionally, PP meshes with the highest PHMG weight ratio (PA/PHMG(3)) exhibited excellent long-term robustness under phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) immersion with a killing ratio against MRSA still exceeding 95% after 60 days of PBS immersion. The present work provides a facile and promising approach for developing antibacterial implants.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Polipropilenos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Polipropilenos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/química , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Pared Abdominal/patología , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/química , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/farmacología , Ratones , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
16.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12278, 2024 05 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806559

RESUMEN

Repair and reconstruction of the myopectineal orifice area using meshes is the mainstay of surgical treatment of inguinal hernias. However, the limitations of existing meshes are becoming increasingly evident in clinical applications; thus, the idea of using three-dimensionally (3D)-printed biological meshes was put forward. According to the current level of the 3D printing technology and the inherent characteristics of biological materials, the direct use of the 3D printing technology for making biological materials into finished products suitable for clinical applications is not yet supported, but synthetic materials can be first printed into 3D form carriers, compounded with biological materials, and finally made into finished products. The purpose of this study was to develop a technical protocol for making 3D-printed biomesh carriers using polyurethane as a raw material. In our study: raw material, polyurethane; weight, 20-30 g/m2; weaving method, hexagonal mesh; elastic tension aspect ratio, 2:1; diameters of pores, 0.1-1 mm; surface area, 8 × 12 cm2; the optimal printing layer height, temperature and velocity were 0.1 mm, 210-220 °C and 60 mm/s. Its clinical significance lies in: (1) applied to preoperative planning and design a detailed surgical plan; (2) applied to special types of surgery including patients in puberty, recurrent and compound inguinal hernias; (3) significantly improve the efficiency of doctor-patient communication; (4) it can shorten the operation and recovery period by about 1/3 and can save about 1/4 of the cost for patients; (5) the learning curve is significantly shortened, which is conducive to the cultivation of reserve talents.


Asunto(s)
Poliuretanos , Impresión Tridimensional , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Poliuretanos/química , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Materiales Biocompatibles/química , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Ensayo de Materiales
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12029, 2024 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797731

RESUMEN

Inguinal hernia is a prevalent surgical condition in pediatric patients. Despite the efficacy of current treatment modalities, a certain recurrence rate still persists. Hence, our objective in this study is to introduce an innovative surgical technique designed to minimize surgical complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 809 pediatric cases that underwent laparoscopic repair with our innovative technique for inguinal hernia from June 2020 to June 2022. Demographic information, perioperative details, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were thoroughly assessed. All surgeries were conducted laparoscopically under general anesthesia. The procedure commenced by encircling the hernia sac with two sutures under laparoscopic guidance. Subsequently, the sac was exteriorized from the body using the two sutures, followed by ligation and excision of the hernia sac. The research findings demonstrate that the duration of unilateral and bilateral procedures was recorded as 15.9 ± 4.8 and 21.7 ± 3.9 min, respectively. Incision infection occurred in 7 patients (0.87%), and Male Complicated Inguinal Hernia (MCIH) was observed in 2 patients (0.23%). Notably, there were no occurrences of iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, or recurrence (0%) during the follow-up period. In conclusion, our novel modification shows a notable reduction in postoperative recurrence rates and alleviates the impact of the procedure on the positioning of the testis or uterus. This modified technique is both safe and valuable, thus warranting broader adoption and promotion.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Niño , Lactante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Agujas
19.
World J Surg ; 48(6): 1448-1457, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629870

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of prosthetic mesh in laparoscopic repair of large hiatus hernias remains controversial. Clinical and quality of life outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of mesh versus suture repair previously showed few differences at early follow-up. This study evaluated longer-term quality of life outcomes from that trial. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, double blind randomized controlled trial assessed three methods of repair for large hiatus hernias: sutures-only versus absorbable mesh versus non-absorbable mesh. Quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire which was completed preoperatively and then at 3, 6, 12 months following surgery and annually thereafter. SF-36 outcomes were compared across the three repair techniques at longer-term follow-up (3-6 years), and to earlier baseline and 12-month outcomes. RESULTS: 126 patients were randomized; 43-suture-only, 41-absorbable mesh and 42-non-absorbable mesh. Questionnaires were completed by 118 patients preoperatively, 115 at 12 months and 98 at longer-term follow-up (median 5 years). There were no significant differences between the repair techniques for the subscale and composite scores at longer-term follow-up. The mental component score improved significantly after surgery and was sustained across follow-up for all techniques. The physical component score also improved significantly but was lower at longer-term follow-up compared to the 12-month follow up in both mesh groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of large hiatus hernias provides sustained long-term improvement in quality of life. The addition of mesh does not improve quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12605000725662.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Calidad de Vida , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto
20.
J Biomater Appl ; 39(1): 58-65, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652260

RESUMEN

Development of a tear in the abdominal wall allowing for protrusion of intra-abdominal contents is known as a hernia. This can cause pain, discomfort, and may need surgical repair. Hernias can affect people of any age or demographic. In the USA, over 1 million hernia repair procedures are performed each year. During these surgeries, it is common for a mesh to be utilized to strengthen the repair. Different techniques allow for the mesh to be placed in different anatomical planes depending on hernia location and approach. The locations are onlay, inlay, and sublay, with sublay being split into retromuscular or preperitoneal with sublay being the most commonly used. The use of an electrically active hernia repair mesh is of interest to model as electrical stimulation has been shown to improve soft tissue healing which could reduce recurrence rates. Theoretical 3D COMSOL models were built to evaluate the varying electric fields of an electrically active hernia repair mesh at each of the different anatomical planes. Three voltages were chosen (10, 20, and 30 mV) for the study to simulate a low-level electrical signal and the electric field from a piezoelectric material at the tissue layers surrounding the mesh construct. Based on the model outputs, the optimal mesh placement location was the sublay-retromuscular as this location had the highest electric field values in the connective tissues and rectus abdominis muscle, which are the primary tissues of concern for the healing process and a successful repair.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Cicatrización de Heridas , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Humanos , Simulación por Computador , Estimulación Eléctrica , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...