Impact of Serum Phosphorus on Hemoglobin: A Literature Review.

Phosphorus is a macroelement found in the body, mostly in the bones as crystals of hydroxyapatite. Higher levels are found in patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD). Since the early stage of CKD phosphorous excretion is impaired, but the increase of PTH and FGF23 maintains its level in the normal range. In the last decades, the role of FGF23 in erythropoiesis was studied, and now it is well known for its role in anemia genesis in patients affected by conservative CKD. Both Hyperphosphatemia and anemia are two manifestations of CKD, but many studies showed a direct association between serum phosphorous and anemia. Phosphorus can be considered as the common point of more pathogenetic ways, independent of renal function: the overproduction of FGF23, the worsening of vascular disease, and the toxic impairment of erythropoiesis, including the induction of hemolysis.

Association Between the Serum Phosphate Levels and Hospital Mortality as Well as 90-Day Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: COPD patients frequently have abnormal serum phosphorus levels. The objective of this study was to examine the correlation between serum phosphorus levels with hospital and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with COPD. Patients and Methods: The MIMIC IV database was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. We extracted demographics, vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidity, antibiotic usage, ventilation and scoring systems within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Restricted cubic splines and multivariate cox regression analysis models were used to evaluate the connection between serum phosphorus with hospital and 90-day mortality. We assessed and classified various factors including gender, age, renal disease, severe liver disease, the utilization of antibiotics and congestive heart failure. Results: We included a total of 3611 patients with COPD, with a median age of 70.7 years. After adjusting for all other factors, we observed a significant positive association between serum phosphate levels with both hospital mortality (HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.31, p<0.001) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.24, p<0.001). Compared to the medium group (Q2 ≥3.15, <4.0), the adjusted hazard ratios for hospital mortality were 1.47 (95% CI: 1.08-2, p=0.013), and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.06-1.61, p=0.013) for 90-day mortality in the high group (Q3≥4.0). Hospital mortality decreased at serum phosphate levels below 3.8 mg/dl (HR 0.664, 95% CI: 0.468-0.943, p=0.022), but increased for both hospital (HR 1.312, 95% CI: 1.141-1.509, p<0.001) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.236, 95% CI: 1.102-1.386, p<0.001) when levels were above 3.8 mg/dl. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusion: In critical ill COPD patients, this study demonstrated a non-linear association between serum phosphate levels and both hospital and 90-day mortality. Notably, there was an inflection point at 3.8 mg/dl, indicating a significant shift in outcomes. Future prospective research is necessary to validate this correlation.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1-2.

INTRODUCTION: There was limited research on the epidemiology of hyperphosphatemia in early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We aimed to explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic value of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD stages 1-2. METHODS: We enrolled adult patients with CKD stages 1-2 from 24 regional central hospitals across China. Hyperphosphatemia was defined as a serum phosphate level exceeding 1.45 mmol/L. The study outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association of hyperphosphatemia with all-cause and CV mortality. RESULTS: Among 99,266 patients with CKD stages 1-2 across China, the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia was 8.3%. The prevalence of hyperphosphatemia was increased with the level of urinary protein and was higher in younger and female patients. Among 63,121 patients with survival information, during a median of 5.2 years follow-up period, there were 436 (8.0%) and 4,695 (8.1%) deaths in those with and without hyperphosphatemia, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, compared with patients without hyperphosphatemia, patients with hyperphosphatemia were associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.16-1.41). Although nearly 60.3% of hyperphosphatemia could be relieved without phosphate-lowering drug therapy among patients with CKD stages 1-2, transient hyperphosphatemia was also associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperphosphatemia was not rare in patients with CKD stages 1-2 and was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Clinicians should closely monitor serum phosphorus levels in patients with CKD, even in those with normal kidney function.

Tenapanor improves long-term control of high phosphate concentrations in the blood in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a plain language summary of the NORMALIZE study.

What is this summary about?This is a summary of an article that was published in the medical journal Kidney360 describing results from the NORMALIZE study. The NORMALIZE study looked at how well tenapanor tablets reduced higher-than-normal levels of phosphate in the blood of persons with kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis. These persons are unable to keep their blood phosphate levels in a normal range, and high levels of phosphate can contribute to several serious health consequences.Tenapanor is approved as an add-on treatment for high levels of phosphate in the blood of adults with chronic kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis and whose disease does not respond adequately to treatment with phosphate binders or who are not able to take phosphate binders. In earlier clinical studies, tenapanor was studied alone or studied together with phosphate binders. In a 1-year clinical study called PHREEDOM, researchers learned that when tenapanor was used alone, it lowered blood phosphate levels, and treated patients experienced acceptable safety and tolerability as determined by the doctors running the study. In the NORMALIZE study, adult patients took a 30-mg tenapanor tablet twice a day, either alone or with sevelamer, for up to 18 months after they completed the PHREEDOM study.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?The researchers found that one-third of patients taking tenapanor, either alone or with sevelamer, achieved normal blood phosphate levels. This is an improvement from the current standard of care with sevelamer alone to reduce blood phosphate levels. As seen in the earlier studies of tenapanor, the most common adverse event experienced by patients was softer or loose stools. No new safety concerns were reported in the NORMALIZE study.What are the key takeaways?The researchers concluded that tenapanor, used alone or combined with sevelamer, can be used long-term by adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis to reduce the phosphate levels in their blood to within the normal range. Patients who take tenapanor may experience softer or loose stools.This summary was developed by the authors to help adult patients with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis, and their family members and/or caregivers, better understand the effects of taking tenapanor.[Box: see text]Link to original article here.

Management of serum phosphorus over a 1-year follow-up in patients on peritoneal dialysis prescribed sucroferric oxyhydroxide as part of routine care: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Whereas clinical and observational studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) in controlling serum phosphorus (sP) in ESKD, data on the real-world impact of switching to SO in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) are limited. In this retrospective database analysis, we examine the impact of SO on sP management over a 1-year period among PD patients prescribed SO as part of routine clinical care. METHODS: We analyzed de-identified data from adults on PD in Fresenius Kidney Care clinics who were prescribed SO monotherapy between May 2018 and December 2019 as part of routine clinical management. Changes from baseline in sP levels, phosphate binder (PB) pill burden, and laboratory parameters were evaluated during the four consecutive 91-day intervals of SO treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the 402 patients who completed 1 year of SO was 55.2 years at baseline, and they had been on PD for an average of 19.9 months. SO was initiated with no baseline PB recorded in 36.1% of patients, whereas the remaining 257 patients were switched to SO from sevelamer (39.7%), calcium acetate (30.4%), lanthanum (1.2%), ferric citrate (14.0%), or more than one PB (14.8%). Mean sP at baseline was 6.26 mg/dL. After being prescribed SO, the percentage of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dL increased from 32.1% (baseline) to 46.5-54.0% during the 1-year follow-up, whereas the mean number of PB pills taken per day decreased from 7.7 at baseline (among patients on a baseline PB) to 4.6 to 5.4. Serum phosphorus and PB pill burden decreased regardless of changes in residual kidney function over the 12-month period. Similar results were observed for the full cohort (976 patients who either completed or discontinued SO during the 1-year follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on PD who were prescribed SO as part of routine care for phosphorus management experienced significant reductions in SP and PB pills per day and improvements in sP target achievement, suggesting the effectiveness of SO on SP management with a concurrent reduction in pill burden.

The impact of accessibility to non-calcium-based phosphate binders and calcimimetics on mineral outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: A 10-year retrospective analysis of real-world data.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism are common in end-stage kidney disease and are associated with poor outcomes. In addition to adequate dialysis, medications are usually required for optimum control of serum phosphate and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. The use of calcium-based phosphate binders (CBPBs) and active vitamin D is associated with an increase in serum calcium and worsening vascular calcification. To overcome these limitations, non-calcium-based phosphate binders (NCBPBs) and calcimimetics have been developed. However, the coverage for these new medications remains limited in several parts of the world due to the lack of patient-level outcome data and cost. The present study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two main categories of healthcare programs that provided different coverage for medications used to control mineral and bone disorders (MBD). The Social Security/Universal Coverage (SS/UC) program covered only CBPBs and active vitamin D, whereas the Civil Servant/State Enterprise (CS/SE) program provided coverage of CBPBs, active vitamin D, NCBPBs, and calcimimetics. METHODS: This 10-year retrospective cohort study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two healthcare programs in maintenance hemodialysis patients. The differences in serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels, as well as the aortic arch calcification score, were analyzed according to dialysis vintage by linear mixed-effects regression analyses. The difference in the composite outcome of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy was analyzed by the Cox-proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: 714 patients were included in the analyses (full cohort). Of these patients, 563 required at least one type of medication to control MBD (MBD medication subgroup). Serum calcium, phosphate, and the proportions of patients with hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were substantially higher in the SS/UC group compared with the CS/SE group after appropriate adjustments for confounders in both the full cohort and the MBD medication subgroup. These findings were confirmed in propensity-score matched analyses. Higher parathyroid hormone levels and a higher rate of the composite endpoint of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy were also observed in the SS/UC group. A more rapid progression of aortic arch calcification was suggested in the SS/UC group, but between-group changes were not significant. CONCLUSION: Patients under the healthcare program that did not cover the use of NCBPBs and calcimimetics showed higher serum calcium and phosphate levels and a more rapid progression of hyperparathyroidism. The difference in the progression of vascular calcification could not be confirmed in the present study.

Activation of the Calcium Receptor by Calcimimetic Agents Is Preserved Despite Modest Attenuating Effects of Hyperphosphatemia.

BACKGROUND: Phosphorus levels in the range seen clinically among patients undergoing dialysis have been reported to attenuate calcium receptor activation and modify parathyroid hormone (PTH) release from isolated parathyroid glands in vitro. Some clinicians and providers of dialysis thus have suggested that calcimimetic agents are ineffective and should not be used to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism among those undergoing dialysis when serum phosphorus concentrations exceed certain threshold levels. METHODS: To determine whether hyperphosphatemia diminishes the therapeutic response to calcimimetic agents, we used data from large clinical trials to analyze the effects of etelcalcetide and cinacalcet to lower plasma PTH levels in individuals on hemodialysis who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and varying degrees of hyperphosphatemia. RESULTS: Plasma PTH levels declined progressively during 26 weeks of treatment with either etelcalcetide or cinacalcet without regard to the degree of hyperphosphatemia at baseline. However, with each calcimimetic agent, the decreases in PTH from baseline were less at each interval of follow-up during the trials among participants with serum phosphorus levels above one of three prespecified threshold values compared with those with serum phosphorus levels below these thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo findings are the first in humans to support the idea that hyperphosphatemia attenuates calcium receptor activation by calcium ions and by calcimimetic agents. The effect of hyperphosphatemia on the responsiveness to calcimimetic agents appears relatively modest, however, and unlikely to be significant therapeutically. The efficacy of treatment with calcimimetic agents for lowering plasma PTH levels among those with secondary hyperparathyroidism remains robust despite substantial elevations in serum phosphorus.

Association between the initial serum phosphate level and 30-day mortality in blunt trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies on patients with cardiac arrest or sepsis have reported that high initial phosphate levels are associated with poor outcomes. However, no previous study has investigated the association between initial phosphate levels and outcomes in blunt trauma patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational study conducted on blunt trauma patients who had been treated at the single regional trauma center between January 2016 and December 2017. Patients' demographic data, initial vital signs, trauma scores, and laboratory parameters including phosphate levels were collected from the trauma registry. The primary outcome was set to 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were the total volume of blood transfused, 30-day hospital-free days, and 30-day intensive care unit-free days. RESULTS: Of the 1,907 included patients, 1,836 were in the survival group, and 71 were in the nonsurvival group. The nonsurvival group had a significantly higher phosphate level than the survival group. Patients in the hyperphosphatemia group had a higher 30-day mortality, fewer 30-day intensive care unit-free days, and higher transfusion volume than those in the other groups. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, hyperphosphatemia was independently associated with 30-day mortality. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve with the inclusion of phosphate in addition to Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and age was 0.911. Area under the curve was also increased when phosphate was simply added to Injury Severity Score and Revised Trauma Score. CONCLUSION: In blunt trauma patients, hyperphosphatemia was associated with an increased 30-day mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.

Therapeutic Effects of Add-On Tenapanor for Hemodialysis Patients with Refractory Hyperphosphatemia.

INTRODUCTION: Phosphate binders are used to treat hyperphosphatemia. Some patients have inappropriately controlled serum phosphorus levels, which may occur for many reasons, including a high pill burden and adverse events (AEs). Tenapanor selectively inhibits the passive paracellular transfer of phosphate in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing serum phosphorus levels. This novel mechanism of action may contribute to improved phosphate management. The efficacy and safety of tenapanor have not been evaluated in Japanese patients with high serum phosphorus levels despite treatment with phosphate binders. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of add-on tenapanor therapy for reducing serum phosphorus levels in this population. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenapanor or placebo as an add-on to their phosphate binder regimen for 6 weeks. Change in serum phosphorus levels at week 6 (day 43) compared with the baseline value (day 1, week 0) (primary endpoint), achievement of target serum phosphorus levels (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 or ≤5.5 mg/dL), and safety, based on all AEs and drug-related AEs, were among the outcomes evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 24 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group and 23 to the tenapanor group. The mean serum phosphorus level decreased from 7.01 mg/dL on day 1 to 6.69 mg/dL on day 43 in the placebo group and from 6.77 mg/dL on day 1 to 4.67 mg/dL on day 43 in the tenapanor group. In the placebo and tenapanor groups (modified intent-to-treat population), the mean (standard deviation) change in the serum phosphorus level at day 43 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) was 0.08 (1.52) mg/dL and -1.99 (1.24) mg/dL, respectively, with a between-group difference of -2.07 (95% confidence interval: -2.89, -1.26; p < 0.001). The target achievement rate (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 mg/dL at week 6 [LOCF]) was 37.5 and 87.0% in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. Diarrhea was the most common drug-related AE, and it occurred in 8.3 and 65.2% of patients in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. No specific AEs were observed with add-on tenapanor or with phosphate binders. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Therapy with existing phosphate binders and add-on tenapanor resulted in a significant decrease in serum phosphorus level compared with the placebo group in patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia despite treatment with phosphate binders. No new safety signals were raised, and add-on tenapanor was generally well tolerated.

Serum phosphate and mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: Hyperphosphataemia is associated with increased adverse outcomes, including mortality. Re-examining this association using up-to-date data reflecting current and real-world practices, across different global regions and in both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, is important. METHODS: We describe the association between serum phosphate and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in incident dialysis patients between 2008 and 2018 using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Time-dependent Cox proportionate hazards models were used. Models were adjusted for available covariates and fitted for the overall cohort, and also each dialysis modality. RESULTS: 31 989 patients were followed over 97 122 person-years at risk (mean age at first dialysis 61 years, 38% female, 67% haemodialysis). We observed a U-shaped association between serum phosphate and all-cause mortality. In the fully adjusted model, categories of serum phosphate above and below 1.25-1.99 mmol/L were associated with progressively higher risk, reaching a hazard ratio of 2.13 (95% CI 1.93-2.36, p < .001) for serum phosphate ≥2.75 mmol/L, and 1.56 (95% CI 1.44-1.69, p < .001) for serum phosphate <1.00 mmol/L. Low and high levels of serum phosphate were also associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, however the association with high serum phosphate was more pronounced ("J-shaped relationship"). The associations were consistent across sub-analyses of patients receiving haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment. CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary dialysis cohort, both high and low levels of serum phosphate were independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Future studies are required to determine whether treatment of abnormal serum phosphate levels improves mortality.

Association between phosphate disturbances and mortality among critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the association of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia on the first day of ICU admission with mortality in septic critically ill patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients who were admitted to the medical-surgical ICUs between 2014 and 2017 with sepsis or septic shock were categorized as having hypophosphatemia, normophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia based on day 1 serum phosphate values. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the three groups. We used multivariate analysis to examine the association of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia with these outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1422 patients enrolled in the study, 188 (13%) had hypophosphatemia, 865 (61%) normophosphatemia and 369 (26%) had hyperphosphatemia. The patients in the hyperphosphatemia group had significantly lower GCS, higher APACHE II scores, higher serum creatinine, increased use of vasopressors, and required more mechanical ventilation with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio compared with the other two groups. In addition, the hyperphosphatemia group showed significantly higher ICU and hospital mortality in comparison with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Hyperphosphatemia and not hypophosphatemia on the first ICU admission day was associated with an increase in the ICU and hospital mortality in septic critically ill patients.

A Randomized Trial of Tenapanor and Phosphate Binders as a Dual-Mechanism Treatment for Hyperphosphatemia in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis (AMPLIFY).

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. It is unknown whether combining two therapies with different mechanisms of action-tenapanor, an inhibitor of paracellular phosphate absorption, and phosphate binders-is safe and effective for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. METHODS: This double-blind phase 3 trial enrolled 236 patients undergoing maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia (defined in this trial as serum phosphorus 5.5-10 mg/dl inclusive) despite receiving phosphate binder therapy (sevelamer, nonsevelamer, sevelamer plus nonsevelamer, or multiple nonsevelamer binders). These participants were randomly assigned to receive oral tenapanor 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4. RESULTS: Of the 236 randomized patients, 235 (99.6%) were included in the full analysis set; this included 116 in the tenapanor plus binder group and 119 in the placebo plus binder group. A total of 228 patients (96.6%) completed the 4-week treatment period. In the full analysis set (mean age 54.5 years, 40.9% women), patients treated with tenapanor plus binder achieved a larger mean change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4 compared with placebo plus binder (-0.84 versus -0.19 mg/dl, P<0.001). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event, resulting in study drug discontinuation in four of 119 (3.4%) and two of 116 (1.7%) patients receiving tenapanor plus binder or placebo plus binder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A dual-mechanism treatment using both tenapanor and phosphate binders improved control of hyperphosphatemia in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis compared with phosphate binders alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: AMPLIFY, NCT03824587.

Calciprotein Particles: Balancing Mineral Homeostasis and Vascular Pathology.

[Figure: see text].

Serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23): associations with hyperphosphatemia and clinical staging of feline chronic kidney disease.

Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) is an independent monitor of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in human medicine, and FGF-23 may have value as a biomarker in feline CKD. We evaluated the relationship between serum FGF-23 and CKD stages, and the effect of age on FGF-23 in normal cats. We measured FGF-23 and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) concentrations by ELISA, with intra- and inter-assay CVs ≤ 15%. The percentage recovery of FGF-23 and iPTH remained stable for up to 7 d in samples stored at -20°C and -80°C. We measured FGF-23 in 304 cats, among which 196 were diagnosed with CKD. The 108 clinically healthy cats were divided into 5 subgroups based on growth stage (0-2 y, 3-6 y, 7-10 y, 11-14 y, ≥ 15 y). No statistical difference was found in FGF-23 among age groups (p = 0.15) or by sex in healthy subjects. Using the International Renal Interest Society guideline, 34 cats were defined as CKD stage 1, 74 stage 2, 51 stage 3, and 37 stage 4. FGF-23 was higher in cats in all CKD stages than in controls. Higher serum phosphorus was observed in stage 3 (p = 0.04) and 4 (p < 0.01) compared to controls. iPTH increased as CKD progressed. Pearson analysis indicated a positive linear relationship between FGF-23 and iPTH (control: r = 0.70, p < 0.01; CKD: r = 0.46, p = 0.02). FGF-23 may be a useful biomarker of feline CKD and may precede hyperphosphatemia in advanced feline CKD.

Hyperphosphatemia rather than hypophosphatemia indicates a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of hospitalization and death in the intensive care unit. It is vital to identify high-risk patients with poor prognosis in the early stages of sepsis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of serum phosphorus levels for sepsis. METHODS: The data of 4767 patients with sepsis were collected from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III database. The Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing technique and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to test the crude relationship between serum phosphorus levels and mortality or overall survival. The multivariable logistic regression was used to further analyze the relationship between serum phosphorus levels and in-hospital mortality. The subgroup analysis was performed according to renal failure, use of vasopressin and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. RESULTS: Only hyperphosphatemia significantly correlated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.85], while the correlation between hypophosphatemia and in-hospital mortality was not significant (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.70-1.19). The interactions between serum phosphorus and renal failure, use of vasopressin or the SOFA score were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperphosphatemia rather than hypophosphatemia indicates a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis.

State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective.

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed to patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis and are often used in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with CKD glomerular filtration rate category 3a (G3a) or worse, including those with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis, clinical practice guidelines suggest "lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range" with possible strategies including dietary phosphate restriction or use of binders. Additionally, guidelines suggest restricting the use of oral elemental calcium often contained in phosphate binders. Nutrition guidelines in CKD suggest<800-1,000mg of calcium daily, whereas CKD bone and mineral disorder guidelines do not provide clear targets, but<1,500mg in maintenance dialysis patients has been previously recommended. Many different classes of phosphate binders are now available and clinical trials have not definitively demonstrated the superiority of any class of phosphate binders over another with regard to clinical outcomes. Use of phosphate binders contributes substantially to patients' pill burden and out-of-pocket costs, and many have side effects. This has led to uncertainty regarding the use and best choice of phosphate binders for patients with CKD or kidney failure. In this controversies perspective, we discuss the evidence base around binder use in CKD and kidney failure with a focus on comparisons of available binders.

Translation of Nutrient Level Recommendations to Control Serum Phosphate Into Food-Based Advice.

The control of hyperphosphatemia is key to the management of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder. Dietary restriction of phosphorus is essential to control hyperphosphatemia. Guidelines for chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease generally provide high-level guidance on whether a nutrient should be restricted e.g, restrict dietary phosphorus. Dietitians translate such guidance into nutrient-based strategies and finally into food-based practical dietary advice for patients to follow. The practical aspects of dietary advice are not well described in the literature, neither are the challenges of concurrently altering 1 nutrient e.g., phosphorus while continuing to restrict others e.g., potassium, while maintaining overall nutritional adequacy and quality of life. In this article, we describe how we translated updated nutrient level recommendations into practical dietary advice to be delivered at the bedside.