Cesarean section prior to 28 weeks' gestation: which type of uterine incision is optimal?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence physician preference for type of hysterotomy incisions in gravidas with a singleton or twin pregnancy undergoing cesarean section under 28 weeks, and to assess factors that result in delivery complications, defined as either intraoperative dystocia or hysterotomy extension. We hypothesized that compared to those with non-cephalic presentations, gravidas with a presenting fetus in cephalic presentation would have higher rates of low-transverse cesarean section, and reduced rates of delivery complications with low-transverse hysterotomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort chart analysis of 128 gravidas between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks undergoing cesarean section at a single academic institution between August 2010 and December 2022. Data was abstracted for factors that might influence the decision for hysterotomy incision type, as well as for documentation of difficulty with delivery of the fetus or need for hysterotomy extension to affect delivery. RESULTS: There was a total of 128 subjects, 113 with a singleton gestation and 15 with twins. The presenting fetus was in cephalic presentation in 43 (33.6%), breech presentation in 71 (55.5%), transverse/oblique lie in 13 (10.2%), and not documented in 1 (0.8%). Sixty-eight (53.1%) had a low-transverse cesarean section (LTCS), 53 (41.4%) had a Classical, 5 (3.9%) had a low-vertical hysterotomy and 2 (1.6%) had a mid-transverse incision. There was a significantly higher rate of LTCS among gravidas with the presenting fetus in cephalic presentation (30/43, 69.8%) compared to those with breech (31/71, 43.7%) or transverse/oblique presentations (7/13, 53.8%), p = .03. No other significant associations were related to hysterotomy incision, including nulliparity, racially or ethnically minoritized status, plurality, indication for cesarean delivery, or pre-cesarean labor. Twenty (15.6%) subjects experienced either an intraoperative dystocia or hysterotomy extension. For the entire cohort, there was a greater median cervical dilatation in those with delivery complications (4.0 cm, IQR .5 - 10 cm) compared to those without complications (1.5, IQR 0 - 4.0), p = .03, but no significant association between delivery complications and fetal presentation, hysterotomy type, plurality, or other demographic/obstetrical factors. However, among gravidas undergoing low-transverse cesarean section, only 2/30 (6.7%) with cephalic presentations had a delivery complication, compared to 9/31 (29.0%) with breech presentations and 3/7 (42.9%) with a transverse/oblique lie, p = .03. CONCLUSION: In pregnancies under 28 weeks, the performance of a low-transverse cesarean section was significantly associated only with presentation of the presenting fetus. Among those with cephalic presentations, the rate of intrapartum dystocia or hysterotomy extension was low after a low-transverse hysterotomy, suggesting that in this subgroup, a low-transverse cesarean section should be considered.

Cephalad-caudad vs transverse blunt expansion of low transverse hysterotomy during caesarean section and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage: A prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of caesarean section as a delivery method is increasing worldwide. However, there is notable divergence among countries in their national guidelines regarding the optimal technique for blunt expansion hysterotomy of the low transverse uterine incision during caesarean section (cephalad-caudad or transverse). AIM: To compare the risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) between cephalad-caudad and transverse blunt expansion hysterotomy during caesarean section. METHODS: This prospective comparative observational study was conducted in a university maternity hospital. All women who gave birth to one infant by caesarean section after 30 weeks of gestation between November 2020 and November 2021 were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were a coagulation disorder, the presence of placenta previa, multiple pregnancies, or enlargement of the hysterotomy with scissors. The choice between cephalad-caudad or transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy was left to the surgeon's discretion. The primary outcome measure was severe PPH, defined as estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 ml. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to assess the risk of severe PPH associated with the two methods of enlarging the low transverse hysterotomy. RESULTS: The study included 850 women, of whom 404 underwent transverse blunt expansion and 446 underwent cephalad-caudad blunt expansion. The overall incidence of severe PPH was 13.3 %. Univariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the frequency of severe PPH between the cephalad-caudad and transverse blunt expansion groups (13.9 % vs 12.6 %; p = 0.61). However, the use of additional surgical sutures (mainly additional haemostatic stitches) was less common with cephalad-caudad blunt expansion (26.7 % vs 36.9 %; p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in risk between the two techniques (odds ratio 1.17, 95 % confidence interval 0.77-1.78). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the risk of severe PPH was found between cephalad-caudad and transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy during caesarean section.

Fetal bradycardia in open versus fetoscopic prenatal repair of spina bifida.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of fetal bradycardia in open versus fetoscopic fetal spina bifida surgery. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing open (n = 25) or fetoscopic (n = 26) spina bifida repair between 2017 and 2022. From October 2017 to June 2020, spina bifida repairs were performed via an open classical hysterotomy, and from November 2020 to June 2022 fetoscopic repairs were performed following transition to this technique. Fetal heart rate (FHR) in beats per minute (bpm) was recorded via echocardiography every 15 min during the procedure. Cohort characteristics, fetal bradycardia and maternal physiologic parameters were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Fetuses undergoing an open repair more frequently developed bradycardia defined as <110 bpm (32% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.008), and a trend was observed for FHR decreases more than 25 bpm from baseline (20% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.073). Profound bradycardia less than 80 bpm was rare, occurring in only three operations (two in open, one in fetoscopic repair) with two fetuses (one in each group) requiring emergency cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: When compared to open fetal surgery, fetal bradycardia occurred less frequently in fetoscopic surgery despite a significantly greater anesthetic exposure and the use of the intraamniotic carbon dioxide insufflation.

The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk for preterm birth has been observed among individuals with a previous second stage cesarean delivery when compared with those with a previous vaginal delivery. One mechanism that may contribute to the increased risk for preterm birth following a second stage cesarean delivery is the increased risk for cervical injury because of extension of the uterine incision (hysterotomy) into the cervix. The contribution of hysterotomy extension to the rate of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy has not been investigated and may shed light on the mechanism underlying the observed relationship between the mode of delivery and subsequent preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the association between unintended hysterotomy extension and preterm birth in a subsequent delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic perinatal data collected from 2 university-affiliated obstetrical centers. The study included patients with a primary cesarean delivery of a term, singleton live birth and a subsequent singleton birth in the same catchment (2005-2021). The primary outcome was subsequent preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation; secondary outcomes included subsequent preterm birth at <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation. We assessed crude and adjusted associations between unintended hysterotomy extensions and subsequent preterm birth with log binomial regression models using rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted models included several characteristics of the primary cesarean delivery such as maternal age, length of active labor, indication for cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, and maternal comorbidity. RESULTS: A total 4797 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of unintended hysterotomy extension in the primary cesarean delivery was 6.0% and the total rate of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was 4.8%. Patients with an unintended hysterotomy extension were more likely to have a longer duration of active labor, chorioamnionitis, failed vacuum delivery attempt, second stage cesarean delivery, and persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head in the primary cesarean delivery and higher rates of smoking in the subsequent pregnancy. Multivariable analyses that controlled for several confounders showed that a history of hysterotomy extension was not associated with a higher risk for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.47), but it was associated with preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.42). CONCLUSION: Patients with a uterine incision extension have a 2.5 times higher rate of preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation when compared with patients who did not have this injury. This association was not observed for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation. Future research should aim to replicate our analyses with incorporation of additional data to minimize the potential for residual confounding.

Length of hysterotomy for fetal spina bifida repair is associated with prematurity risk.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether prenatal repair of spina bifida aperta through mini-hysterotomy results in less prematurity, as compared to standard hysterotomy, when adjusting for known prematurity risks. METHODS: We performed a bi-centric, propensity score matched, controlled study, that is, adjusting for factors earlier reported to result in premature delivery or membrane rupture, in consecutive women having prenatal repair either through stapled hysterotomy or sutured mini-hysterotomy (≤3.5 cm). Matches were pairwise compared and cox-regression analysis was performed to define the hazard ratio of delivery <37 weeks. RESULTS: Of 346 meeting the MOMS-criteria, 78 comparable pairs were available for matched-controlled analysis. Mini-hysterotomy patients were younger and had a higher BMI. Mini-hysterotomy was associated with a 1.67-lower risk of delivery <37 weeks (hazard ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.42-0.85; p = 0.004) and 1.72 for delivery <34 + 6 weeks (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.34-0.97; p = 0.037). The rate of intact uterine scar at birth (mini-hysterotomy: 98.7% vs. hysterotomy: 90.4%; p = 0.070), the rate of reversal of hindbrain herniation within 1 week after surgery (88.9% vs. 97.4%; p = 0.180) and the rate of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (0% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.50) were comparable. CONCLUSION: Prenatal spina bidifa repair through mini-hysterotomy was associated with a later gestational age at delivery and a comparable intact uterus rate without apparent compromise in neuroprotection.

Unintended lower-segment hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and the risk for uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between unintended uterine extension in cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy who had unintended lower-segment uterine extension during the primary cesarean delivery (excluding T and J vertical extensions) were compared with patients who did not have an unintended uterine extension. We assessed the subsequent uterine scar disruption rate following the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcome. RESULTS: During the study period, 7199 patients underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study, of whom 1245 (17.3%) had a previous unintended uterine extension and 5954 (82.7%) did not. In univariate analysis, previous unintended uterine extension during the primary cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with uterine scar rupture in the following subsequent TOLAC. Nevertheless, it was associated with uterine scar dehiscence, higher rates of TOLAC failure, and a composite adverse maternal outcome. In multivariate analyses, only the association between previous unintended uterine extension and higher rates of TOLAC failure was confirmed. CONCLUSION: A history of unintended lower-segment uterine extension is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption following subsequent TOLAC.

Risk factors for shunting at 12 months following open fetal repair of spina bifida by mini-hysterotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Open spina bifida (OSB) is the most common neural tube defect. Prenatal repair reduces the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) due to hydrocephalus from 80-90% to 40-50%. We aimed to determine which variables work as risk factors for VPS at 12 months of age in our population. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent prenatal repair of OSB by mini-hysterotomy. The main outcome was occurrence of VPS in the first 12 months of life. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) between prenatal variables and the need for shunting. RESULTS: VPS at 12 months occurred in 34.2% of the children. Larger ventricle size before surgery (62.5% ≥15 mm; 46.2% between 12 and 15 mm; 11.8% <12 mm; p=0.008), higher lesion level (80% >L2, vs. 17.9% ≤L3; p=0.002; OR, 18.4 [2.96-114.30]), and later gestational age at surgery (25.25 ± 1.18 vs. 24.37 ± 1.06 weeks; p=0.036; OR, 2.23 [1.05-4.74]) were related to increased need for shunting. In the multivariate analysis, larger ventricle size before surgery (≥15 mm vs. <12 mm; p=0.046; OR, 1.35 [1.01-1.82]) and higher lesion level (>L2 vs. ≤L3; p=0.004; OR, 39.52 [3.25-480.69]) were risk factors for shunting. CONCLUSIONS: Larger ventricle size before surgery (≥15 mm) and higher lesion level (>L2) are independent risk factors for VPS at 12 months of age in fetuses undergoing prenatal repair of OSB by mini-hysterotomy in the studied population.

Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The uterine caesarean scar defect, also known as uterine niche or isthmocele, is an irregularity in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a previous cesarean section scar. It is associated with obstetrical complications such as caesarean scar, ectopic pregnancy, uterine rupture, and the placenta accreta spectrum. Women with cesarean scar defects are frequently asymptomatic but may also experience abnormal vaginal bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. METHODS: This systematic review aims to determine the best hysterotomy closure technique to prevent subsequent development of uterine scar defects. An electronic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov was performed from January 2001 until December 2020 for studies evaluating hysterotomy closure techniques. RESULTS: Our systematic search strategy identified 1,781 titles. Six studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The results supported the superiority of the double-layer closure over the single-layer closure. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterotomy closure with continuous running sutures in two layers represents a suitable option to prevent cesarean scar defect formation. Particularly, the first layer should include the decidua and the second layer should overlap the first.

Prior vertical uterine incision: Effect on subsequent pregnancy characteristics and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and outcomes of cesarean delivery (CD) in women with a history of vertical hysterotomy. METHOD: This is a comparative study that retrospectively queried the National Inpatient Sample from October 2016 to December 2018. Pregnancy characteristics and surgical outcomes of CD among 18 575 women with prior vertical uterine incision were compared to 1 072 949 women with prior low-transverse incision, assessed by multivariable generalized estimating equation model and propensity score weighting. RESULTS: In a multivariable analysis, women who had prior vertical uterine incision were more likely to have placenta percreta (odds ratio [OR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87-6.20), pre-labor uterine rupture (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.52-4.80), in-labor uterine rupture (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.55-3.51), and extreme preterm delivery <28 weeks (OR 17.8, 95% CI 15.2-20.7) in the current pregnancy, compared to those who had prior low-transverse uterine incision. In a weighted model, prior vertical hysterotomy was associated with increased surgical morbidity in current CD compared to prior low-transverse hysterotomy (10.6% vs. 4.8%, OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.81-2.26), including hemorrhage (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.74-2.27) and hysterectomy (OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.97-4.53). CONCLUSION: Prior vertical uterine incision at CD was associated with increased risk of placenta percreta, uterine rupture, particularly before labor, and adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy.

Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section with hysterotomy above the lower uterine segment.

Background Spontaneous uterine rupture is a severe pregnancy complication. Several risk factors have been described, especially for women with a previous caesarean section. Method We reported two cases of uterine rupture (UR) occurring outside of labour in patients with a history of caesarean section (CS) due to placenta previa. Results: The current study evaluates how a higher hysterotomy, combined with some risk factors, can increase the prevalence of UR in the subsequent pregnancy. Conclusion This study supports that a careful evaluation of risk factors can identify patients who need a specific follow up to early diagnose and treat UR and thus improve the maternal-fetal outcome.

Opciones e indicaciones en el manejo del istmocele / Options and indications in the management of isthmocele

INTRODUCCIÓN: El istmocele es un defecto en la cicatrización del sitio de una histerotomía, que puede cursar con sangrado posmenstrual, dolor pélvico, dismenorrea, dispareunia e infertilidad secundaria. Esta patología ha ido incrementando su prevalencia dado el aumento de la tasa de cesáreas en todo el mundo. OBJETIVO: Se realizó una revisión sobre el istmocele y su manejo, presentando sus indicaciones específicas y las complicaciones asociadas a esta patología. MÉTODO: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda en PubMed, Embase, Scopus y Google Scholar, en la que se encontraron 868 artículos, de los cuales se revisaron 30 al aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. DISCUSIÓN: El istmocele es cada vez más frecuente. Tiene una prevalencia cercana al 60% posterior a la realización de una cesárea y aumenta hasta valores del 100% con tres de ellas. Los métodos diagnósticos más utilizados son la ecografía transvaginal y la histerosonografía. Su abordaje es habitualmente quirúrgico, aunque existe la posibilidad de intentar tratamiento médico en algunos casos. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario determinar el grosor miometrial para poder establecer un plan de manejo adecuado. Además, se ameritan estudios que realicen un seguimiento a largo plazo y que aporten mayor evidencia para la realización de cada procedimiento. Después de clasificar el tipo de defecto, el tratamiento quirúrgico del istmocele se debe ofrecer a pacientes sintomáticas y a aquellas con defectos grandes y que desean mantener la fertilidad.

INTRODUCTION: The isthmocele is a defect in the healing of the site of a hysterotomy, which can present with post-menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and secondary infertility. This pathology has been increasing its prevalence given the increase in the rate of cesarean sections worldwide. OBJECTIVE: A review will be carried out of the isthmocele and its management, presenting its specific indications and the complications associated with this pathology. METHOD: A search was carried out in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar, finding a total of 868 articles, of which 30 of them were reviewed when applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. DISCUSSION: Isthmocele is an increasingly frequent pathology, having a prevalence of 60% after performing a cesarean section and increasing to 100% with 3 of them. There are multiple diagnostic methods, mainly transvaginal ultrasound and sono-hysterosonography. The approach to this pathology is usually surgical, although there is the possibility of trying medical treatment in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to determine the myometrial thickness in order to establish an adequate management plan. Additionally, long-term follow-up studies are warranted and provide more evidence for the performance of each procedure. After classifying the type of defect, surgical treatment of the isthmocele should be offered to symptomatic patients or those with large defects and who desire future fertility.

Placental Location in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine incision based on the placental location in open maternal-fetal surgery (OMFS) has never been evaluated in regard to maternal or fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an anterior placenta was associated with increased rates of intraoperative, perioperative, antepartum, obstetric, or neonatal complications in mothers and babies who underwent OMFS for fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) closure. METHODS: Data from the international multicenter prospective registry of patients who underwent OMFS for fMMC closure (fMMC Consortium Registry, December 15, 2010-June 31, 2019) was used to compare fetal and maternal outcomes between anterior and posterior placental locations. RESULTS: The placental location for 623 patients was evenly distributed between anterior (51%) and posterior (49%) locations. Intraoperative fetal bradycardia (8.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.005) and performance of fetal resuscitation (3.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.034) occurred more frequently in cases with an anterior placenta when compared to those with a posterior placenta. Obstetric outcomes including membrane separation, placental abruption, and spontaneous rupture of membranes were not different among the 2 groups. However, thinning of the hysterotomy site (27.7% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.008) occurred more frequently in cases of an anterior placenta. Gestational age (GA) at delivery (p = 0.583) and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.655) were similar between the 2 groups. Fetal incision dehiscence and wound revision were not significantly different between groups. Critical clinical outcomes including fetal demise, perinatal death, and neonatal death were all infrequent occurrences and not associated with the placental location. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior placental location is associated with increased risk of intraoperative fetal resuscitation and increased thinning at the hysterotomy closure site. Individual institutional experiences may have varied, but the aggregate data from the fMMC Consortium did not show a significant impact on the GA at delivery or maternal or fetal clinical outcomes.

Preliminary Evaluation of a Novel Fetal Guinea Pig Myelomeningocele Model.

INTRODUCTION: Translational models of myelomeningocele (MMC) are needed to test novel in utero interventions. An ideal animal model for MMC has locomotor function at birth and is low cost enough to allow for high throughput. The rat MMC model is limited by immature locomotor function at birth. The ovine MMC model is a costly surgical model. Guinea pigs are uniquely suited for an MMC model being a small animal model with locomotor function at birth. We aimed to develop a retinoic acid (RA) model of MMC in the guinea pig and to evaluate if pregnant guinea pigs could tolerate uterine manipulation. METHODS: Time-mated Dunkin Hartley guinea pig dams were dosed with 60 mg/kg of RA between gestation age (GA) 12 and 15 days in the development of an RA model. Fetuses were grossly evaluated for MMC lesions at Cesarean section after GA 31 days. Evaluation of the ability of pregnant guinea pig dams to tolerate uterine surgical intervention was performed by hysterotomy of a separated group of time-mated guinea pigs at GA 45, 50, and 55. RESULTS: Forty-two pregnant guinea pigs were dosed with RA, with a total of 189 fetuses. The fetal demise rate was 38% (n = 71). A total of 118 fetuses were viable, 83% (n = 98) were normal fetuses, 8% (n = 10) had a neural tube defect, and 8% (n = 10) had a hematoma or other anomalies. No fetuses developed an MMC defect. None of the fetuses that underwent hysterotomy survived to term. CONCLUSION: RA dosed at 60 mg/kg in guinea pigs between GA 12 and 15 did not result in MMC. Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs did not tolerate a hysterotomy near term in our surgical model. Further work is needed to determine if MMC can be induced in guinea pigs with alternate RA dosing.

Misoprostol-augmented induction of labour for third trimester fetal demise in a patient with prior hysterotomies.

A 31-year-old G3P2002 with history of two prior caesarean sections presented with influenza-like illness, requiring intubation secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Investigations revealed intrauterine fetal demise at 30-week gestation.She soon deteriorated with sepsis and multiple organs impacted. Risks of the gravid uterus impairing cardiopulmonary function appeared greater than risks of delivery, including that of uterine rupture. Vaginal birth after caesarean was achieved with misoprostol and critical care status rapidly improved.Current guidelines for management of fetal demise in patients with prior hysterotomies are mixed: although the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends standard obstetric protocols rather than misoprostol administration for labour augmentation, there is limited published data citing severe maternal morbidity associated with misoprostol use. This case report argues misoprostol-augmented induction of labour can be a reasonable option in a medically complex patient with fetal demise and prior hysterotomies.

Alternative Hysterotomy Technique for the Reduction of Prenatal Complications of Intrauterine Myelomeningocele Repair.

INTRODUCTION: The main aim of the fetal surgery of myelomeningocele (MMC) is the improvement in prognosis for children with this defect and at the same time high safety of the procedure for mother and fetus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of alternative hysterotomy technique for fetal surgery of MMC in prevention of essential perinatal complications. METHODS: Forty-nine pregnant women diagnosed with fetal MMC (fMMC) who underwent classic hysterotomy without the use of stapler formed the study cohort. Two cases of intrauterine fetal death or neonatal death in the immediate perioperative period in the study group (SG) were excluded from further analyses. In the historical control group (46 patients) from our center hysterotomy was performed according to Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) protocol. The study cohort's outcomes were compared with the historical controls and with post-MOMS results in Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). RESULTS: In the SG we did not observe delivery before 30 weeks of gestation (0/47; 0%) and the incidence of chorionamniotic membrane separation (CMS, 3/47; 6%) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM, 7/47; 15%) was lower compared to the other groups. Preterm delivery as a result of uterine contractions occurred significantly less frequently in the SG (8/47; 17%). Fetal surgery with classic hysterotomy resulted in rare use of magnesium sulfate (3/47; 6%). CONCLUSIONS: The alternative hysterotomy technique for fetal surgery of MMC results in low occurrences of CMS, PPROM, preterm delivery, and the rare use of tocolytics.

Evaluation and ranking of different interventions for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIM: To identify the highest-ranked pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: We conducted an online bibliographic search in different databases from inception till July 2019. We included randomized controlled trials assessing effect of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions on pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. Our main outcomes were pain scores at different endpoints of the procedure. We applied this network meta-analysis based on the frequentist approach using statistical package 'netmeta' (version 1.0-1) in R. RESULTS: The review included 39 randomized controlled trials (Women n = 3964). Misoprostol plus intracervical block anesthesia (mean difference [MD] = -3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-6.06, -0.59]), misoprostol (MD = -1.92, 95% CI [-3.04, -0.81]) and IV analgesia (MD = -2.01, 95% CI [-3.27, -0.25]) were effective in reducing pain during the procedure compared to placebo. Ranking probability showed that misoprostol plus intracervical block anesthesia was the highest ranked pharmacological treatment for pain relief during the procedure (P score = 0.92) followed by misoprostol alone (P score = 0.78), and IV analgesia (P score = 0.76). Regarding nonpharmacological treatments, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) showed a significant pain reduction compared to placebo (MD = -1.80, 95% CI [-3.31, -0.29]). TENS ranked as the best nonpharmacological treatment (P score = 0.80) followed by CO2 distention (P score = 0.65) and bladder distention (P score = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Combination of misoprostol plus local anesthesia appears to be the most effective pharmacological approach for pain reduction during and after outpatient hysteroscopy. Nonpharmacological approaches as TENS and bladder distention showed considerable efficacy but should be further investigated.

Chorioamniotic membrane separation following fetal myelomeningocele repair: incidence, risk factors and impact on perinatal outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair has been shown to provide significant benefits to the infant, decreasing the postnatal need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt and improving motor outcome. Chorioamniotic membrane separation (CAS) is a potential complication following prenatal MMC repair and may increase the risk of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) and preterm birth. The objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate the incidence of CAS after prenatal MMC repair; (2) to determine risk factors associated with its occurrence; and (3) to assess its association with adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent fetal MMC repair between November 2011 and December 2018. Surgery was performed using either a fetoscopic (laparotomy or exteriorized uterus) approach or an open-hysterotomy approach. Eligibility criteria were those reported in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study. If CAS was detected on ultrasound (US), its severity was graded as 'mild' if amnion detachment involved < 25% of the uterine cavity, 'moderate' if it involved 25-50% and 'severe' if it involved > 50%. Evolution of CAS was classified as stable, increasing or decreasing based on the difference in severity grading between the time at first diagnosis and the last US scan before delivery. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify pre- or perisurgical factors associated with the development of CAS and to determine the risk of adverse perinatal outcome associated with CAS. RESULTS: In total, 91 cases were included. Fetoscopic or open-hysterotomy repair of MMC was performed in 52/91 (57.1%) and 39/91 (42.9%) cases, at a median gestational age (GA) of 25.0 weeks (range, 22.9-26.0 weeks) and 25.0 weeks (range, 21.3-25.9 weeks), respectively. CAS was diagnosed in 31/91 (34.1%) patients, at a median GA of 28.1 weeks (range, 24.4-37.6 weeks). Anterior placenta was identified as a risk factor for the postoperative development of CAS (odds ratio (OR), 3.72 (95% CI, 1.46-9.5); P < 0.01). This risk was dependent on the repair technique. An anterior placenta significantly increased the risk of CAS after fetoscopic repair (OR, 3.94 (95% CI, 1.14-13.6); P = 0.03) but not after open repair (OR, 2.8 (95% CI, 0.6-12.5); P = 0.16). There was no significant difference in the rate of CAS after fetoscopic repair (21/52 (40.4%)) vs open-hysterotomy repair (10/39 (25.6%)) (P = 0.14), nor were there any differences in GA at diagnosis of CAS, interval between surgery and diagnosis, distribution of CAS severity or progression of CAS between the two groups. CAS increased the risk of PPROM (50% in those with vs 12% in those without CAS) (OR, 7.6 (95% CI, 2.5-21.9); P < 0.01) and preterm delivery (70% vs 38%) (OR, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.3-8.1); P < 0.01). Fetoscopically repaired cases with CAS had a higher rate of PPROM (12/20 (60.0%) vs 2/31 (6.5%); P < 0.01) and preterm delivery (13/20 (65.0%) vs 5/31 (16.1%); P < 0.01) than those that did not develop CAS, while the differences were not significant in cases with open-hysterotomy repair. Early detection of CAS (before 30 weeks' gestation) was a risk factor for preterm delivery (90% before 30 weeks vs 36% at or after 30 weeks) (OR, 15.7 (95% CI, 2.3-106.3); P < 0.01). There was no association between PPROM or preterm delivery and the severity or progression of CAS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an anterior placenta was the only factor that increased the risk for CAS after fetoscopic MMC repair. Detection of CAS after fetoscopic MMC repair significantly increases the risk for PPROM and preterm delivery. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Obstetric outcomes of ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT).

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure is used to secure effective gas exchange prior to postnatal life. We describe the obstetrical course and maternal outcomes of a series of patients who underwent EXIT. METHODS: This is a review of all pregnancies in which fetuses were delivered by EXIT from January 2001 to April 2018. Outcome variables included estimated gestational age (EGA) at delivery, need for emergency EXIT, maternal estimated blood loss (EBL), need for maternal blood transfusion, and maternal postoperative length of hospital stay. Data were tested for normality and reported as median [range] and n (%). RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were delivered by EXIT procedure. Sixteen (35.6%) of the EXIT procedures were performed emergently. Median maternal EBL was 800 (500-2000) mL; 6 (13.3%) patients received blood transfusion. Median maternal postoperative length of hospital stay was four [3-7] days. CONCLUSION: Our data highlight the complexity of the obstetrical management in the EXIT procedure as evidenced by an approximately 36% chance of emergency delivery. Despite having an experienced multidisciplinary team, 13.3% of our subjects underwent maternal blood transfusion. This information can be used in counseling EXIT candidates regarding the risks and benefits of this procedure.