Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.677
Filtrar
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1266456, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756881

RESUMEN

Aim: The increasing morbidity from coronary health disease (CHD) has imposed a significant social and economic burden in China. We analyzed the factors affecting hospitalization expenses of CHD patients. Design: From 2012 to 2018, data on 16,726 CHD patients were collected from the hospital information system in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Methods: A multiple ordered logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting hospitalization expenses. Results: The average hospitalization expense was RMB30998.26 ± 29890.03. Hospital materials expenses accounted for roughly 60% of total hospitalization costs. The older adult, patients who were male, in critical health status, with longer hospital stays, unemployed, using antibiotics and undergoing an operation without incision had significantly raised hospital expenses, while those with fewer complications, no operations and self-paying for health care had reduced hospitalization costs (p < 0.05). The length of hospital stay played a partial mediator role (p < 0.05). Public contribution: Controlling the increase of medical materials costs and preventing over-consumption of hospital services by insured patients are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , China , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Coronaria/economía , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 605, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) have become a public health problem for all countries, bringing a heavier economic burden of disease globally, with China's disease economic burden being even more acute due to the trend of an aging population. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs in traditional Chinese medicine (TCMa) hospitals to provide a scientific basis for controlling hospitalization cost. METHODS: With 1306 cases of DRFs patients hospitalized in 15 public TCMa hospitals in two cities of Gansu Province in China from January 2017 to 2022 as the study object, the influencing factors of hospitalization cost were studied in depth gradually through univariate analysis, multiple linear regression, and path model. RESULTS: Hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs is mainly affected by the length of stay, surgery and operation, hospital levels, payment methods of medical insurance, use of TCMa preparations, complications and comorbidities, and clinical pathways. The length of stay is the most critical factor influencing the hospitalization cost, and the longer the length of stay, the higher the hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: TCMa hospitals should actively take advantage of TCMb diagnostic modalities and therapeutic methods to ensure the efficacy of treatment and effectively reduce the length of stay at the same time, to lower hospitalization cost. It is also necessary to further deepen the reform of the medical insurance payment methods and strengthen the construction of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, to make the patients receive reasonable reimbursement for medical expenses, thus effectively alleviating the economic burden of the disease in the patients with DRFs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Medicina Tradicional China , Fracturas del Radio , Humanos , China , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Anciano , Fracturas del Radio/economía , Fracturas del Radio/terapia , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Adulto , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Fracturas de la Muñeca
3.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(5): 430-440, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia. However, published studies of CLL have either only focused on costs among individuals diagnosed with CLL without a non-CLL comparator group or focused on costs associated with specific CLL treatments. An examination of utilization and costs across different care settings provides a holistic view of utilization associated with CLL. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health care costs and resource utilization types attributable to CLL among Medicare beneficiaries and identify predictors associated with each of the economic outcomes among beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL. METHODS: This retrospective study used a random 20% sample of the Medicare Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW) database covering the 2017-2019 period. The study population consisted of individuals with and without CLL. The CLL cohort and non-CLL cohort were matched using a 1:5 hard match based on baseline categorical variables. We characterized economic outcomes over 360 days across cost categories and places of services. We estimated average marginal effects using multivariable generalized linear regression models of total costs and across type of services. Total cost was compared between CLL and non-CLL cohorts using the matched sample. We used generalized linear models appropriate for the count or binary outcome to identify factors associated with various categories of health care resource utilization, such as inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and oncologist/hematologist visits. RESULTS: A total of 2,736 beneficiaries in the CLL cohort and 13,571 beneficiaries in the non-CLL matched cohort were identified. Compared with the non-CLL cohort, the annual cost for the CLL cohort was higher (CLL vs non-CLL, mean [SD]: $22,781 [$37,592] vs $13,901 [$24,725]), mainly driven by health care provider costs ($6,535 vs $3,915) and Part D prescription drug costs ($5,916 vs $2,556). The main categories of health care resource utilization were physician evaluation/management visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and laboratory services. Compared with beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, beneficiaries aged 85 years or older had lower use and cost in maintenance services (ie, oncologist visits, hospital outpatient costs, and prescription drug cost) but higher use and cost in acute services (ie, ED). Compared with residency in a metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with fewer physician visits but higher ED visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The cooccurrence of lower utilization of routine care services, along with higher utilization of acute care services among some individuals, has implications for patient burden and warrants further study.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Medicare , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/economía , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e030679, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/economía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302808, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696487

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the largest problems facing the world today is the morbidity and mortality caused by antibiotic resistance in bacterial infections. A major factor in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the irrational use of antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the prescribing pattern and cost of antibiotics in two major governmental hospitals in the West Bank of Palestine. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 428 inpatient prescriptions containing antibiotics from two major governmental hospitals, they were evaluated by some drug use indicators. The cost of antibiotics in these prescriptions was calculated based on the local cost. Descriptive statistics were performed using IBM-SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The mean ± SD number of drugs per prescription (NDPP) was 6.72 ± 4.37. Of these medicines, 38.9% were antibiotics. The mean ± SD number of antibiotics per prescription (NAPP) was 2.61 ± 1.54. The average ± SD cost per prescription (CPP) was 392 ± 744 USD. The average ± SD antibiotic cost per prescription (ACPP) was 276 ± 553 USD. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (52.8%), metronidazole (24.8%), and vancomycin (21.0%). About 19% of the antibiotics were prescribed for intra-abdominal infections; followed by 16% used as prophylactics to prevent infections. Almost all antibiotics prescribed were administered intravenously (IV) 94.63%. In general, the average duration of antibiotic therapy was 7.33 ± 8.19 days. The study indicated that the number of antibiotics per prescription was statistically different between the hospitals (p = 0.022), and it was also affected by other variables like the diagnosis (p = 0.006), the duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), and the NDPP (p < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics and the cost of antibiotics per prescription were significantly different between the two hospitals (p < 0.001); The cost was much higher in the Palestinian Medical Complex. CONCLUSION: The practice of prescribing antibiotics in Palestine's public hospitals may be unnecessary and expensive. This has to be improved through education, adherence to recommendations, yearly immunization, and stewardship programs; intra-abdominal infections were the most commonly seen infection in inpatients and ceftriaxone was the most frequently administered antibiotic.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Medio Oriente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Anciano
6.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 42(6): 633-647, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following clinical research of potential coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments, numerous decision-analytic models have been developed. Due to pandemic circumstances, clinical evidence was limited and modelling choices were made under great uncertainty. This study aimed to analyse key methodological characteristics of model-based economic evaluations of COVID-19 drug treatments, and specifically focused on modelling choices which pertain to disease severity levels during hospitalisation, model structure, sources of effectiveness and quality of life and long-term sequelae. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review and searched key databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus) for original articles on model-based full economic evaluations of COVID-19 drug treatments. Studies focussing on vaccines, diagnostic techniques and non-pharmaceutical interventions were excluded. The search was last rerun on 22 July 2023. Results were narratively synthesised in tabular form. Several aspects were categorised into rubrics to enable comparison across studies. RESULTS: Of the 1047 records identified, 27 were included, and 23 studies (85.2%) differentiated patients by disease severity in the hospitalisation phase. Patients were differentiated by type of respiratory support, level of care management, a combination of both or symptoms. A Markov model was applied in 16 studies (59.3%), whether or not preceded by a decision tree or an epidemiological model. Most cost-utility analyses lacked the incorporation of COVID-19-specific health utility values. Of ten studies with a lifetime horizon, seven adjusted general population estimates to account for long-term sequelae (i.e. mortality, quality of life and costs), lasting for 1 year, 5 years, or a patient's lifetime. The most often reported parameter influencing the outcome of the analysis was related to treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The results illustrate the variety in modelling approaches of COVID-19 drug treatments and address the need for a more standardized approach in model-based economic evaluations of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRY: Protocol registered in PROSPERO under CRD42023407646.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Modelos Económicos , Humanos , COVID-19/economía , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Pandemias/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
7.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0300267, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although breastfeeding is recommended as the optimal form of nutrition in the first six months, it is not sustained as the predominant mode of feeding infants in Scotland. This study estimated the impact of infant feeding choices on primary and secondary healthcare service costs in a 13-year birth cohort. METHOD: Using linked administrative datasets, in a retrospective cohort design of 502,948 singletons born in Scotland between 1997 and 2009, we estimated the cost of GP consultations and hospital admissions by area deprivation and mode of infant feeding up to 6-8 weeks for ten common childhood conditions from birth to 27 months. Additionally, we calculated the potential healthcare savings if all infants in the cohort had been exclusively breastfed at 6-8 weeks. Discounting of 1.5% was applied following current health economic conventions and 2009/10 used as the base year. RESULTS: Over the study period, the estimated cost of hospital admissions in the cohort was £111 million and £2 million for the 2% subset of the cohort with primary care records. Within each quintile of deprivation, exclusively breastfed infants used fewer healthcare services and incurred lower costs compared to infants fed (any) formula milk. At least £10 million of healthcare costs may have been avoided if formula-fed infants had been exclusively breastfed within the first 6-8 weeks of birth. CONCLUSIONS: This study using a representative birth cohort demonstrates how breastmilk can promote equitable child health by reducing childhood illness and healthcare utilisation in the early years.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/economía , Lactante , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia , Masculino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Fórmulas Infantiles/economía
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 373, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777864

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a known side effect of chemotherapy, often requiring hospitalization. Economic burden increases with an FN episode and estimates of cost per episode should be updated from real-world data. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis of FN episodes in patients with non-myeloid malignancies from 2014 to 2021 was performed in IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. FN episodes were defined as having same-day claims for neutropenia and fever or infection, plus antibiotic in outpatient settings, following a claim for chemotherapy; index date was defined as the first claim for neutropenia/fever/infection. Patients receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplant and CAR-T therapy were excluded, as were select hematologic malignancies or COVID-19. Healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated and described overall, by episode type (w/wo hospitalization), index year, malignancy type, NCI comorbidity score, and age group. RESULTS: 7,033 FN episodes were identified from 6,825 patients. Most episodes had a hospitalization (91.2%) and 86% of patients had ≥1 risk factor for FN. Overall, FN episodes had a mean (SD) FN-related cost of $25,176 ($39,943). Episodes with hospitalization had higher average FN-related costs versus those without hospitalization ($26,868 vs $7,738), and costs increased with comorbidity score (NCI=0: $23,095; NCI >0-2: $26,084; NCI ≥2: $26,851). CONCLUSIONS: FN continues to be associated with significant economic burden, and varied by cancer type, comorbidity burden, and age. In this analysis, most FN episodes were not preceded by GCSF prophylaxis. The results of this study highlight the opportunity to utilize GCSF in appropriate oncology scenarios.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Anciano , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/economía , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía
9.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1329768, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737867

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of hypertensive patients in TCM (traditional Chinese medicine, TCM) hospitals, which can provide a scientific basis for hospitals to control the hospitalization cost of hypertension. Methods: In this study, 3,595 hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of tertiary hypertension in Tianshui City Hospital of TCM, Gansu Province, China, from January 2017 to June 2022, were used as research subjects. Using univariate analysis to identify the relevant variables of hospitalization cost, followed by incorporating the statistically significant variables of univariate analysis as independent variables in multiple linear regression analysis, and establishing the path model based on the results of the multiple linear regression finally, to explore the factors influencing hospitalization cost comprehensively. Results: The results showed that hospitalization cost of hypertension patients were mainly influenced by length of stay, age, admission pathways, payment methods of medical insurance, and visit times, with length of stay being the most critical factor. Conclusion: The Chinese government should actively exert the characteristics and advantages of TCM in the treatment of chronic diseases such as hypertension, consistently optimize the treatment plans of TCM, effectively reduce the length of stay and steadily improve the health literacy level of patients, to alleviate the illnesses pain and reduce the economic burden of patients.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Hipertensión , Medicina Tradicional China , Humanos , Femenino , Hipertensión/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Medicina Tradicional China/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1380690, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721535

RESUMEN

Background: Obesity has been extensively studied over the years, primarily focusing on the physiological aspects of the disease. However, the general burden of obesity mainly the financial implications and its influence on hospitalization and length of stay have only recently garnered attention in the literature, particularly in the case of Portugal. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between obesity and hospitalizations in the Portuguese adult population and compare the average costs of hospitalization among participants with and without obesity. Methods: At baseline, the analytic sample consisted of 10,102 participants aged ≥18 years from the Portuguese population-based Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Cohort (EpiDoC). Participants were then followed for up to 10 years from 2011 to 2021 in three more waves of data collection. Body mass index was derived from self-reported weight and height, and instances of hospitalization were self-reported by the participants. The associated costs for each hospitalization episode were categorized according to national legislation and valued according to the pricing for Diagnosis Related Groups. Results: Obesity was associated with more hospitalizations (for example, Obesity class I vs. normal weight: OR = 1.33 [1.14-1.55]). However, when the presence of multimorbidity was considered, this association diminished. While longer hospital length of stay was observed in individuals with higher obesity categories, this difference did not reach statistical significance. On average, the total hospitalization costs per patient with obesity amounted to €200.4 per year. Conclusion: Obesity is as a risk factor for hospitalizations and potentially with higher length of stay hospitalizations, with this effect being partially mediated by the concurrent presence of multimorbidity. Consequently, obesity constitutes an additional burden on healthcare systems. This underscores the imperative of implementing cost-effective prevention programs aimed at addressing and managing this significant public health concern.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Obesidad , Humanos , Portugal/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 57, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations have increased risk of developing diabetes and experience poorer treatment outcomes than the general population. The FORGE AHEAD program partnered with First Nations communities across Canada to improve access to resources by developing community-driven primary healthcare models. METHODS: This was an economic assessment of FORGE AHEAD using a payer perspective. Costs of diabetes management and complications during the 18-month intervention were compared to the costs prior to intervention implementation. Cost-effectiveness of the program assessed incremental differences in cost and number of resources utilization events (pre and post). Primary outcome was all-cause hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use. Data were obtained from a diabetes registry and published literature. Costs are expressed in 2023 Can$. RESULTS: Study population was ~ 60.5 years old; 57.2% female; median duration of diabetes of 8 years; 87.5% residing in non-isolated communities; 75% residing in communities < 5000 members. Total cost of implementation was $1,221,413.60 and cost/person $27.89. There was increase in the number and cost of hospitalizations visits from 8/$68,765.85 (pre period) to 243/$2,735,612.37. Specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use followed this trend. CONCLUSION: Considering the low cost of intervention and increased care access, FORGE AHEAD represents a successful community-driven partnership resulting in improved access to resources.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus , Servicios de Salud del Indígena , Hospitalización , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Canadá , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Atención a la Salud/economía , Anciano , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Pueblos Indígenas , Adulto , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/economía
12.
N Z Med J ; 137(1595): 48-63, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754113

RESUMEN

AIMS: A NZ$5 co-payment prescription charge was removed in July 2023 but may be reinstated. Here we quantify the health impact and cost of not being able to afford this charge. METHODS: We linked New Zealand Health Surveys (2013/2014-2018/2019) to hospitalisation data using data available in Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). Cox proportional-hazards models compared time to hospitalisation between those who had faced a cost barrier to collecting a prescription and those who had not. RESULTS: Of the 81,626 total survey respondents, 72,243 were available for analysis in IDI. A further 516 were excluded to give an analysis dataset of 71,502. Of these, 5,889 (8.2%) reported not collecting a prescription due to cost in the previous year. Among people who faced a cost barrier, 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.7-61.2%) were admitted to hospital during the study period, compared to 43.9% (95% CI 43.6-44.3%) of those who did not. Having adjusted for socio-demographic variables, people who faced a cost barrier were 34% (hazard ratio 1.34; 95% CI 1.29-1.39) more likely to be admitted to hospital than those who did not. Annual avoidable hospitalisation costs-were prescription co-payments to remain free-are estimated at $32.4 million per year based on the assumption of a causal relationship between unmet need for prescription medicines and subsequent hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: The revenue to the health system from co-payments may be offset by the costs associated with avoidable hospitalisations.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Honorarios por Prescripción de Medicamentos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11114, 2024 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750118

RESUMEN

Oral bacteria are known to be associated with perioperative complications during hospitalization. However, no presented reports have clarified the relationship of oral bacterial number with medical costs for inpatients. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database system used in Japan provides clinical information regarding acute hospital patients. The present study was conducted to determine the association of oral bacterial numbers in individual patients treated at a single institution with length of hospital stay and medical costs using DPC data. A total of 2369 patients referred by the medical department to the dental department at Hiroshima University Hospital were divided into the low (n = 2060) and high (n = 309) oral bacterial number groups. Length of hospital stay and medical costs were compared between the groups, as well as the associations of number of oral bacteria with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)-related diseases in regard to mortality and disease severity. There was no significant difference in hospital stay length between the low (24.3 ± 24.2 days) and high (22.8 ± 20.1 days) oral bacterial number groups. On the other hand, the daily hospital medical cost in the high group was significantly greater (US$1456.2 ± 1505.7 vs. US$1185.7 ± 1128.6, P < 0.001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in CCI score between the groups, whereas the daily hospital medical costs for patients in the high group treated for cardiovascular disease or malignant tumors were greater than in the low number group (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis was also performed, which showed that oral bacterial number, age, gender, BMI, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, malignant tumor, and hospital stay length were independently associated with daily hospitalization costs. Monitoring and oral care treatment to lower the number of oral bacteria in patients affected by cardiovascular disease or cancer may contribute to reduce hospitalization costs.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Boca/microbiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital , Carga Bacteriana , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias/clasificación , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Adulto
14.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 411, 2024 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and spondylolisthesis (SPL) are characterized as degenerative spinal pathologies and share considerable similarities. However, opinions vary on whether to recommend exercise or restrict it for these diseases. Few studies have objectively compared the effects of daily physical activity on LSS and SPL because it is impossible to restrict activities ethnically and practically. We investigated the effect of restricting physical activity due to social distancing (SoD) on LSS and SPL, focusing on the aspect of healthcare burden changes during the pandemic period. METHODS: We included first-visit patients diagnosed exclusively with LSS and SPL in 2017 and followed them up for two years before and after the implementation of the SoD policy. As controls, patients who first visited in 2015 and were followed for four years without SoD were analyzed. The common data model was employed to analyze each patient's diagnostic codes and treatments. Hospital visits and medical costs were analyzed by regression discontinuity in time to control for temporal effects on dependent variables. RESULTS: Among 33,484 patients, 2,615 with LSS and 446 with SPL were included. A significant decrease in hospital visits was observed in the LSS (difference, -3.94 times/month·100 patients; p = 0.023) and SPL (difference, -3.44 times/month·100 patients; p = 0.026) groups after SoD. This decrease was not observed in the data from the control group. Concerning medical costs, the LSS group showed a statistically significant reduction in median copayment (difference, -$45/month·patient; p < 0.001) after SoD, whereas a significant change was not observed in the SPL group (difference, -$19/month·patient; p = 0.160). CONCLUSION: Restricted physical activity during the SoD period decreased the healthcare burden for patients with LSS or, conversely, it did not significantly affect patients with SPL. Under circumstances of physical inactivity, patients with LSS may underrate their symptoms, while maintaining an appropriate activity level may be beneficial for patients with SPL.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ejercicio Físico , Vértebras Lumbares , Estenosis Espinal , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Espondilolistesis/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Distanciamiento Físico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Pandemias
15.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3429-3436, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631948

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We assess the cost-effectiveness of switching from standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccination (SD-QIV) to high-dose vaccination (HD-QIV) for Dutch adults aged 60 years and older. METHODS: A health-economic model was used to compare the scenario where HD-QIV was implemented compared to the current standard, SD-QIV. This model used a lifetime horizon and assessed the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective. A recently published meta-analysis was used to incorporate the benefits of HD-QIV, including cardiorespiratory hospitalizations, in analyses considering RCT only or combining RCT and RWE estimates in a scenario analysis. RESULTS: Implementing HD-QIV is cost effective at its list price, with an ICER of €5,400 per QALY gained. The main driver of these results is the prevention of cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Other public health benefits are the prevention of GP consults and deaths. HD-QIV is highly likely to be cost-effective, reaching a 100% probability of being cost effective at the Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing HD-QIV for adults aged 60 and over within the existing influenza vaccination campaign is highly cost effective. HD-QIV may support alleviating potential capacity issues in Dutch hospitals in the winter respiratory season.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hospitalización , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Países Bajos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Modelos Económicos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
16.
Med Care ; 62(6): 396-403, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The provision of high-quality hospital care requires adequate space, buildings, and equipment, although redundant infrastructure could also drive service overprovision. OBJECTIVE: To explore the distribution of physical hospital resources-that is, capital assets-in the United States; its correlation with indicators of community health and nonhealth factors; and the association between hospital capital density and regional hospital utilization and costs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We created a dataset of n=1733 US counties by analyzing the 2019 Medicare Cost Reports; 2019 State Inpatient Database Community Inpatient Statistics; 2020-2021 Area Health Resource File; 2016-2020 American Community Survey; 2022 PLACES; and 2019 CDC WONDER. We first calculated aggregate hospital capital assets and investment at the county level. Next, we examined the correlation between community's medical need (eg, chronic disease prevalence), ability to pay (eg, insurance), and supply factors with 4 metrics of capital availability. Finally, we examined the association between capital assets and hospital utilization/costs, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Counties with older and sicker populations generally had less aggregate hospital capital per capita, per hospital day, and per hospital discharge, while counties with higher income or insurance coverage had more hospital capital. In linear regressions controlling for medical need and ability to pay, capital assets were associated with greater hospital utilization and costs, for example, an additional $1000 in capital assets per capita was associated with 73 additional discharges per 100,000 population (95% CI: 45-102) and $19 in spending per bed day (95% CI: 12-26). CONCLUSIONS: The level of investment in hospitals is linked to community wealth but not population health needs, and may drive use and costs.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/economía
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 507, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659025

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) incur substantial costs on the health system that could be partially avoided with adequate outpatient care. Complications of chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), are considered ACSC. Previous studies have shown that hospitalizations due to diabetes have a significant financial burden. In Mexico, DM is a major health concern and a leading cause of death, but there is limited evidence available. This study aimed to estimate the direct costs of hospitalizations by DM-related ACSC in the Mexican public health system. METHODS: We selected three hospitals from each of Mexico's main public institutions: the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), the Ministry of Health (MoH), and the Institute of Social Security and Services for State Workers (ISSSTE). We employed a bottom-up microcosting approach from the healthcare provider perspective to estimate the total direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC. Input data regarding length of stay (LoS), consultations, medications, colloid/crystalloid solutions, procedures, and laboratory/medical imaging studies were obtained from clinical records of a random sample of 532 hospitalizations out of a total of 1,803 DM-related ACSC (ICD-10 codes) discharges during 2016. RESULTS: The average cost per DM-related ACSC hospitalization varies among institutions, ranging from $1,427 in the MoH to $1,677 in the IMSS and $1,754 in the ISSSTE. The three institutions' largest expenses are LoS and procedures. Peripheral circulatory and renal complications were the major drivers of hospitalization costs for patients with DM-related ACSC. Direct costs due to hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC in these three institutions represent 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) dedicated to health and social services and 2% of total hospital care expenses. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC vary considerably across institutions. Disparities in such costs for the same ACSC among different institutions suggest potential disparities in care quality across primary and hospital settings (processes and resource utilization), which should be further investigated to ensure optimal supply utilization. Prioritizing preventive measures for peripheral circulatory and renal complications in DM patients could be highly beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Diabetes Mellitus , Hospitalización , Humanos , México , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
18.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 28(2): 103744, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670167

RESUMEN

This is a cost analysis study based on hospital admissions, conducted from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), carried out in a cohort of patients hospitalized at the University Hospital of Brasília (UHB) due to Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI) caused by COVID-19, from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022. An approach based on macro-costing was used, considering the costs per patient identified in the Hospital Admission Authorizations (HAA). Were identified 1,015 HAA from 622 patients. The total cost of hospitalizations was R$ 2,875,867.18 for 2020 and 2021. Of this total, 86.41 % referred to hospital services and 13.59 % to professional services. The highest median cost per patient identified was for May 2020 (R$ 19,677.81 IQR [3,334.81-33,041.43]), while the lowest was in January 2021 (R$ 1,698.50 IQR [1,602.70-2,224.11]). The high cost of treating patients with COVID-19 resulted in a high economic burden of SARI due to COVID-19 for UHB and, consequently, for SUS.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Humanos , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
JAMA ; 331(18): 1544-1557, 2024 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557703

RESUMEN

Importance: Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of hospitalization, and health care costs. Regional interventions may be advantageous in mitigating MDROs and associated infections. Objective: To evaluate whether implementation of a decolonization collaborative is associated with reduced regional MDRO prevalence, incident clinical cultures, infection-related hospitalizations, costs, and deaths. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted from July 1, 2017, to July 31, 2019, across 35 health care facilities in Orange County, California. Exposures: Chlorhexidine bathing and nasal iodophor antisepsis for residents in long-term care and hospitalized patients in contact precautions (CP). Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline and end of intervention MDRO point prevalence among participating facilities; incident MDRO (nonscreening) clinical cultures among participating and nonparticipating facilities; and infection-related hospitalizations and associated costs and deaths among residents in participating and nonparticipating nursing homes (NHs). Results: Thirty-five facilities (16 hospitals, 16 NHs, 3 long-term acute care hospitals [LTACHs]) adopted the intervention. Comparing decolonization with baseline periods among participating facilities, the mean (SD) MDRO prevalence decreased from 63.9% (12.2%) to 49.9% (11.3%) among NHs, from 80.0% (7.2%) to 53.3% (13.3%) among LTACHs (odds ratio [OR] for NHs and LTACHs, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57), and from 64.1% (8.5%) to 55.4% (13.8%) (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93) among hospitalized patients in CP. When comparing decolonization with baseline among NHs, the mean (SD) monthly incident MDRO clinical cultures changed from 2.7 (1.9) to 1.7 (1.1) among participating NHs, from 1.7 (1.4) to 1.5 (1.1) among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 30.4%; 95% CI, 16.4%-42.1%), from 25.5 (18.6) to 25.0 (15.9) among participating hospitals, from 12.5 (10.1) to 14.3 (10.2) among nonparticipating hospitals (group × period interaction reduction, 12.9%; 95% CI, 3.3%-21.5%), and from 14.8 (8.6) to 8.2 (6.1) among LTACHs (all facilities participating; 22.5% reduction; 95% CI, 4.4%-37.1%). For NHs, the rate of infection-related hospitalizations per 1000 resident-days changed from 2.31 during baseline to 1.94 during intervention among participating NHs, and from 1.90 to 2.03 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 26.7%; 95% CI, 19.0%-34.5%). Associated hospitalization costs per 1000 resident-days changed from $64 651 to $55 149 among participating NHs and from $55 151 to $59 327 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 26.8%; 95% CI, 26.7%-26.9%). Associated hospitalization deaths per 1000 resident-days changed from 0.29 to 0.25 among participating NHs and from 0.23 to 0.24 among nonparticipating NHs (group × period interaction reduction, 23.7%; 95% CI, 4.5%-43.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: A regional collaborative involving universal decolonization in long-term care facilities and targeted decolonization among hospital patients in CP was associated with lower MDRO carriage, infections, hospitalizations, costs, and deaths.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infecciones Bacterianas , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Instituciones de Salud , Control de Infecciones , Anciano , Humanos , Administración Intranasal , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Baños/métodos , California/epidemiología , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Yodóforos/administración & dosificación , Yodóforos/uso terapéutico , Casas de Salud/economía , Casas de Salud/normas , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Precauciones Universales , Transferencia de Pacientes
20.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675850

RESUMEN

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are common reasons for healthcare consultations. The inpatient management of RVIs consumes significant resources. From 2009 to 2014, we assessed the costs of RVI management in 4776 hospitalized children aged 0-18 years participating in a quality improvement program, where all ILI patients underwent virologic testing at the National Reference Centre followed by detailed recording of their clinical course. The direct (medical or non-medical) and indirect costs of inpatient management outside the ICU ('non-ICU') versus management requiring ICU care ('ICU') added up to EUR 2767.14 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 29,941.71 (ICU) for influenza, EUR 2713.14 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 16,951.06 (ICU) for RSV infections, and EUR 2767.33 (non-ICU) vs. EUR 14,394.02 (ICU) for human rhinovirus (hRV) infections, respectively. Non-ICU inpatient costs were similar for all eight RVIs studied: influenza, RSV, hRV, adenovirus (hAdV), metapneumovirus (hMPV), parainfluenza virus (hPIV), bocavirus (hBoV), and seasonal coronavirus (hCoV) infections. ICU costs for influenza, however, exceeded all other RVIs. At the time of the study, influenza was the only RVI with antiviral treatment options available for children, but only 9.8% of influenza patients (non-ICU) and 1.5% of ICU patients with influenza received antivirals; only 2.9% were vaccinated. Future studies should investigate the economic impact of treatment and prevention of influenza, COVID-19, and RSV post vaccine introduction.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Hospitalización , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Alemania/epidemiología , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Hospitalización/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/terapia , Pacientes Internos , Virosis/economía , Virosis/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Costos de la Atención en Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA