Use of icodextrin solution to evaluate peritoneal transport capacity.

Peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is the gold standard for evaluating peritoneal transport, and measurement of the drain volume after 4-h dwell time with glucose 4.25% is a simple means of evaluating failure of ultrafiltration. The study objective was to verify if the measurement of the volume drained after 4 h dwell of icodextrin at 7.5% (ICO), has a better correlation with the parameters of PET. Patients in a peritoneal dialysis program (N = 35) underwent three procedures: PET; determination of the drain volume after a 4-h dwell with glucose 4.25%; and determination of the drain volume after a 4-h dwell with ICO. Among patients who were classified as high transporters, the ultrafiltration volume was greater after ICO use. The ICO ultrafiltration volume correlated negatively with the ratio between the 4- and 0-h dialysate glucose concentrations (D4/D0 ratio, r = -0.579; P = 0.002), correlating positively with the dialysate-to-plasma ratio for creatinine (D/PCr ratio, r = 0.474; P = 0.002). For ICO, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.867 and 0.792 for the D/PCr and D4/D0 ratios (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.004, respectively), compared with 0.738 and 0.710 for glucose 4.25% (P = 0.020 and P = 0.041, respectively). A cut-off volume of 141 mL discriminated high/high-average transporters from low/low-average transporters. Volume drained after ICO use better predicts peritoneal transport patterns than does that drained after the use of glucose 4.25%.

Differences in predicting glucose absorption from peritoneal dialysate compared to measured absorption in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and ambulatory peritoneal dialysis cyclers.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glucose-containing peritoneal dialysates are used to generate an osmotic gradient for the convective removal of water and sodium. Predictive equations were developed to estimate glucose absorption without having to formally measure changes in dialysate glucose. In view of the changes in peritoneal dialysis prescriptions over time, we compared predicted and measured glucose absorption. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We measured peritoneal glucose losses when peritoneal dialysis patients attended their first assessment of peritoneal membrane function, and compared this to glucose exposure and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative, Grodstein and Bodnar predictive equations. RESULTS: We studied 689 patients; 329 (56.9%) males, 53 (37.1%) diabetics, with mean age 57.1 ± 16.2 years, with 186 treated by automated peritoneal dialysis cyclers and 377 by automated peritoneal dialysis with a daytime icodextrin exchange and 126 by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Using Bland -Altman analysis, all equations demonstrated systematic bias overestimating glucose absorption with increasing glucose absorption. For continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative formula underestimated glucose absorption (bias 188 (-39 to 437) mmol/day, as did Grodstein (bias 37.9 (-105 to 29) mmol/day, whereas mean bias for Bodnar was -29 (-130 to 180)). There was systematic overestimation for all equations for both automated peritoneal dialysis with and without a daytime exchange, with increasing bias with greater glucose absorption. CONCLUSION: Although formally measuring peritoneal glucose absorption is time consuming and requires patient co-operation, current predictive equations overestimate glucose absorption and do not provide accurate estimations of glucose absorption particularly for automated peritoneal dialysis patients.

Mechanisms of Crystalloid versus Colloid Osmosis across the Peritoneal Membrane.

Background Osmosis drives transcapillary ultrafiltration and water removal in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis. Crystalloid osmosis, typically induced by glucose, relies on dialysate tonicity and occurs through endothelial aquaporin-1 water channels and interendothelial clefts. In contrast, the mechanisms mediating water flow driven by colloidal agents, such as icodextrin, and combinations of osmotic agents have not been evaluated.Methods We used experimental models of peritoneal dialysis in mouse and biophysical studies combined with mathematical modeling to evaluate the mechanisms of colloid versus crystalloid osmosis across the peritoneal membrane and to investigate the pathways mediating water flow generated by the glucose polymer icodextrin.ResultsIn silico modeling and in vivo studies showed that deletion of aquaporin-1 did not influence osmotic water transport induced by icodextrin but did affect that induced by crystalloid agents. Water flow induced by icodextrin was dependent upon the presence of large, colloidal fractions, with a reflection coefficient close to unity, a low diffusion capacity, and a minimal effect on dialysate osmolality. Combining crystalloid and colloid osmotic agents in the same dialysis solution strikingly enhanced water and sodium transport across the peritoneal membrane, improving ultrafiltration efficiency over that obtained with either type of agent alone.Conclusions These data cast light on the molecular mechanisms involved in colloid versus crystalloid osmosis and characterize novel osmotic agents. Dialysis solutions combining crystalloid and colloid particles may help restore fluid balance in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Single Daily Icodextrin Exchange as Initial and Solitary Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Incremental dialysis utilizes gradually increasing dialysis doses in response to declines in residual kidney function, and it is the preferred renal replacement therapy for patients who have just transitioned to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) may impose fewer restrictions on patients' lifestyle, help attenuate lifetime peritoneal and systemic exposure to glucose and its degradation products, and minimize connections that could compromise the sterile fluid path. In this study, we utilized a 3-pore kinetic model to assess fluid and solute removal during single daily icodextrin treatments for patients with varying glomerular filtration rates (GFR). METHODS: Single icodextrin exchanges of 8 to 16 hours using 2- and 2.5-L bag volumes were simulated for different patient transport types (i.e., high to low) to predict daily peritoneal ultrafiltration (UF), daily peritoneal sodium removal, and weekly total (peritoneal + residual kidney) Kt/V (Kt/VTotal) for patients with residual renal GFRs ranging from 0 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: Daily peritoneal UF varied from 359 to 607 mL, and daily peritoneal Na removal varied from 52 to 87 mEq depending on length of icodextrin exchange and bag volume. Both were effectively independent of patient transport type. All but very large patients (total body water [TBW] > 60 L) were predicted to achieve adequate dialysis (Kt/VTotal ≥ 1.7) with a GFR of 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, and small patients (TBW: 30 L) were predicted to achieve adequate dialysis with a GFR of 6 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: A single daily icodextrin exchange can be tailored to augment urea, UF, and Na removal in patients with sufficient residual kidney function (RKF). A solitary icodextrin exchange may therefore be reasonable initial therapy for some incident ESRD patients.