Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 531
Filtrar
2.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 109, 2024 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777916

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by microvascular damage of skin and internal organs with chronic hypoxia and release of cytokines and hormones such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and Klotho. Aim of the study was to evaluate FGF-23, Klotho and NGAL serum levels in SSc patients and healthy controls (HC) and to evaluate serum levels changes of FGF-23, Klotho and NGAL after Iloprost. METHODS: Twenty-one SSc patients and 20 HC were enrolled. In SSc patients, peripheral venous blood samples were collected at the first day before the autumn Iloprost infusion (t0), 60 min (t1) and 14 days after Iloprost infusion (t2). RESULTS: SSc patients had higher serum level of FGF-23 [18.7 ± 6.4 pg/ml versus 3.6 ± 2.2 pg/ml, p < 0.001], Klotho [5.1 ± 0.8 pg/ml versus 2.3 ± 0.6 pg/ml, p < 0.001] and NGAL [20.9 ± 2.6 pg/ml versus 14.5 ± 1.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001] than HC. Iloprost infusion reduces serum level of FGF-23 (18.7 ± 6.4 pg/ml versus 10.4 ± 5.5 pg/ml, p < 0.001), Klotho (5.1 ± 0.8 pg/ml versus 2.5 ± 0.6 pg/ml, p < 0.001) and NGAL (20.9 ± 2.6 pg/ml versus 15.1 ± 2.3 pg/ml, p < 0.001) between t0 and t1. The Iloprost infusion reduces serum level of FGF-23 (18.7 ± 6.4 pg/ml versus 6.6 ± 5.1 pg/ml), Klotho (5.1 ± 0.8 pg/ml versus 2.3 ± 0.4 pg/ml) and NGAL (20.9 ± 2.6 pg/ml versus 15.5 ± 1.9 pg/ml) between t0 and t2. CONCLUSIONS: SSc patients had higher FGF-23, Klotho and NGAL than HC. Iloprost reduces serum levels of FGF-23, Klotho and NGAL.


Asunto(s)
Factor-23 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Glucuronidasa , Iloprost , Proteínas Klotho , Lipocalina 2 , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/sangre , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/sangre , Lipocalina 2/sangre , Adulto , Glucuronidasa/sangre , Citocinas/sangre , Anciano , Hipoxia/sangre , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E585-E591, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We identified the need to modernize frostbite management in our northern centre and implemented a treatment protocol in 2015. Our aim was to describe the clinical course of patients presenting to the hospital since the implementation of the protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series from Whitehorse General Hospital, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada. We reviewed the charts of patients who presented to the hospital with grade 2-4 frostbite and were treated as per our protocol between Feb. 9, 2015, and Feb. 8, 2020. Patients with grade 2-4 frostbite received iloprost; in addition, those with grade 4 frostbite received alteplase and heparin. We determined the number of digits affected and salvaged, and the time from presentation to the emergency department to treatment initiation. We also examined patients' demographic characteristics, predisposing events, frostbite severity and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: In 22 patients treated for grade 2-4 frostbite, 142 digits were affected: 59 with grade 2 frostbite, 25 with grade 3 frostbite and 58 with grade 4 frostbite; of the 142, 113 (79.6%) were salvaged. All 29 digits amputated had grade 4 frostbite. The mean time from presentation to iloprost initiation was reduced from 32.9 hours in 2015 to 3.0 hours in 2020. Sports (10 cases [45%]) and alcohol use (6 [27%]) were the most common precipitating events, with alcohol use tending to result in more severe injury (grade 4 in 5 of 6 cases). Adverse reactions with iloprost (e.g., headache) were common but mild. Adverse reactions with alteplase (e.g., bleeding) were less common but of greater clinical significance. INTERPRETATION: Over the study period, our protocol contributed to improvement in frostbite care at our institution, resulting in a digit salvage rate comparable to other published results. Our 5-year experience shows that advanced medical care of frostbite can be achieved, even at a rural centre.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Dedos , Congelación de Extremidades , Heparina , Iloprost , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Amputación Quirúrgica/métodos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Dedos/patología , Dedos/cirugía , Congelación de Extremidades/diagnóstico , Congelación de Extremidades/epidemiología , Congelación de Extremidades/cirugía , Congelación de Extremidades/terapia , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Deportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatadores/efectos adversos , El Yukón/epidemiología
7.
Respir Med ; 180: 106354, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33721696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the prostacyclin analog inhaled iloprost modulates dead space, dynamic hyperinflation (DH), and systemic inflammation/oxidative stress during maximal exercise in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were not selected based on pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: Twenty-four COPD patients with moderate-severe obstruction (age 59 ± 7 years, FEV1 53 ± 13% predicted) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Each subject received a single nebulized dose of 5.0 µg iloprost or placebo on non-consecutive days followed by maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests. The primary outcome was DH quantified by end-expiratory lung volume/total lung capacity ratio (EELV/TLC) at metabolic isotime. RESULTS: Inhaled iloprost was well-tolerated and reduced submaximal alveolar dead-space fraction but did not significantly reduce DH (0.70 ± 0.09 vs 0.69 ± 0.07 following placebo and iloprost, respectively, p = 0.38). Maximal exercise time (9.1 ± 2.3 vs 9.3 ± 2.2 min, p = 0.31) and peak oxygen uptake (17.4 ± 6.3 vs 17.9 ± 6.9 mL/kg/min, p = 0.30) were not significantly different following placebo versus iloprost. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of inhaled iloprost was safe and reduced alveolar dead space fraction; however, it was not efficacious in modulating DH or improving exercise capacity in COPD patients who were not selected for the presence of PH.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Administración por Inhalación , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Consumo de Oxígeno , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/metabolismo , Capacidad Pulmonar Total
8.
Respir Med ; 179: 106336, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647836

RESUMEN

Therapy with intravenous prostacyclin analogues in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been established for decades and is an integral component of the current guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Initially, these drugs were infused by external pump systems via tunnelled right atrial catheters with the need for cooling and frequent exchange of drug reservoirs. Associated complications included, among others, catheter-related infections. More recently, fully implantable pump systems have been developed with drug reservoirs that are filled transcutaneously, allowing intervals between refills of several weeks. This technique results in a low rate of infections. Epoprostenol, iloprost and treprostinil have all been used intravenously in PAH, but titration, dosing and dose escalation in long-term therapy are not standardized. Intravenous prostacyclin analogues are still under-used, despite available data suggesting that early and broad application of these therapies as part of risk-oriented, guideline-directed combination therapy for patients with PAH may lead to a survival benefit. This review provides a detailed overview of the drugs, infusion systems and dosing strategies used for intravenous therapy in patients with PAH.


Asunto(s)
Epoprostenol/administración & dosificación , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epoprostenol/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Bombas de Infusión/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
9.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(3): 636-648, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561307

RESUMEN

Pulmonary hypertension (PH), an often unrelenting disease that carries with it significant morbidity and mortality, affects not only the pulmonary vasculature but, in turn, the right ventricle as well. The survival of patients with PH is closely related to the right ventricular function. Therefore, having an understanding of how to manage right ventricular failure (RVF) and acute pulmonary hypertensive crises is imperative for clinicians who encounter these patients. This review addresses the management of these patients in detail, addressing: (a) the pathophysiology of RVF, (b) intensive care monitoring of these patients in the intensive care unit, (c) imaging of the right ventricle, (d) intubation and mechanical ventilation, (e) inotrope and vasopressor selection, (f) pulmonary vasodilator use, (g) interventional and surgical procedures for the acutely failing right ventricle, and (h) mechanical support for RVF.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapia , Función Ventricular Derecha/fisiología , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Capnografía , Presión Venosa Central , Ecocardiografía , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Epoprostenol/administración & dosificación , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Milrinona/farmacología , Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Radiografía Torácica , Respiración Artificial , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta/métodos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Vasopresinas/uso terapéutico
10.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 50(4): 307-313, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622195

RESUMEN

Objectives: Intravenous iloprost (ILO) has widely demonstrated its effectiveness and safety in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Unfortunately, there is no clear consent about dosage, duration, frequency, and infusion modality. The aim of this study was to compare two different therapeutic schemes in the same cohort of consecutive SSc subjects, evaluating differences in terms of effectiveness [digital ulcer (DU) outcome], safety, and direct healthcare costs.Method: This was a retrospective observational study of 47 patients classified with SSc treated with intravenous ILO for severe Raynaud's phenomenon and/or DUs. Two regimens were compared: a continuous inpatient scheme and a daily outpatient scheme. Demographics and clinical data, concomitant therapies, adverse events, and data on resource use and costs were collected.Results: The number of DUs rose slightly with the switch from the continuous to the daily scheme (0.61 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.7). Moreover, in the daily scheme there was an increase in the number of therapeutic cycles (2.4 ± 0.7 vs 4.71 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and an increase in patients treated with other vasoactive drugs. There was a reduction in ILO tolerability and more than half of the patients suspended the treatment. Five patients required hospitalization for severe and refractory DUs in the daily scheme. Moreover, the costs of the two treatments were comparable [median 7174 (range 2748-18 524) EUR vs 6284 (3232-22 706) EUR, p = 0.712].Conclusion: Treatment with a daily scheme of ILO is characterized by worse tolerability and a higher dropout rate compared to a low-flow regimen, with similar costs. We suggest that a low-flow continuous therapeutic scheme is preferable in SSc patients.


Asunto(s)
Iloprost/uso terapéutico , Prostaglandinas/uso terapéutico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Iloprost/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostaglandinas/administración & dosificación , Prostaglandinas/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(3): 593-613, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002306

RESUMEN

Pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease that carries a poor prognosis if left untreated. Although there are published guidelines for the treatment of children with pulmonary hypertension, due to the limited number of robust pediatric clinical trials, recommendations are often based on limited data or clinical experience. Furthermore, many practical aspects of care, particularly for the pediatric patient, are learned through experience and best navigated with a multidisciplinary team. While newer PAH therapies have been approved for adults, there is still limited but expanding experience in pediatrics. This new information will help improve the targets of goal-oriented therapy. Lastly, this review highlights practical aspects in the use of the different therapies available for the treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar Primaria Familiar/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Bosentán/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Epoprostenol/administración & dosificación , Epoprostenol/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Fenotipo , Fenilpropionatos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Piridazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Receptores de Endotelina/metabolismo , Citrato de Sildenafil/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Tadalafilo/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
12.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 12: CD012980, 2020 12 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33341943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frostbite is a thermal injury caused when tissue is exposed to sub-zero temperatures (in degrees Celsius) long enough for ice crystals to form in the affected tissue. Depending on the degree of tissue damage, thrombosis, ischaemia, necrosis (tissue death), gangrene and ultimately amputation may occur. Several interventions for frostbite injuries have been proposed, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, sympathectomy (nerve block), thrombolytic (blood-thinning) therapy and vasodilating agents such as iloprost, reserpine, pentoxifylline and buflomedil, but the benefits and harms of these interventions are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of the different management options for frostbite injuries. SEARCH METHODS: On 25 February 2020, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase (OvidSP), ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S), as well as trials registers. Shortly before publication, we searched Clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, OpenGrey and GreyLit (9 November 2020) again. We investigated references from relevant articles, and corresponded with a trial author. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any medical intervention, e.g. pharmacological therapy, topical treatments or rewarming techniques, for frostbite injuries to another treatment, placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data. We used Review Manager 5 for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess bias in the included trial. We assessed incidence of amputations, rates of serious and non-serious adverse events, acute pain, chronic pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life, withdrawal rate from medical therapy due to adverse events, occupational effects and mortality. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included one, open-label randomised trial involving 47 participants with severe frostbite injuries. We judged this trial to be at high risk of bias for performance bias, and uncertain risk for attrition bias; all other risk of bias domains we judged as low. All participants underwent rapid rewarming, received 250 mg of aspirin and 400 mg intravascular (IV) buflomedil (since withdrawn from practice), and were then randomised to one of three treatment groups for the following eight days. Group 1 received additional IV buflomedil 400 mg for one hour per day. Group 2 received the prostacyclin, iloprost, 0.5 ng to 2 ng/kg/min IV for six hours per day. Group 3 received IV iloprost 2 ng/kg/min for six hours per day plus fibrinolysis with 100 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for the first day only. The results suggest that iloprost and iloprost plus rtPA may reduce the rate of amputations in people with severe frostbite compared to buflomedil alone, RR 0.05 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.78; P = 0.03; very low-quality evidence) and RR 0.31 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.94; P = 0.04; very low-quality evidence), respectively. Iloprost may be as effective as iloprost plus rtPA at reducing the amputation rate, RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.01 to 2.56; P = 0.19; very low-quality evidence). There were no reported deaths or withdrawals due to adverse events in any of the groups; we assessed evidence for both outcomes as being of very low quality. Adverse events (including flushing, nausea, palpitations and vomiting) were common, but not reported separately by comparator arm (very low-quality evidence). The included study did not measure the outcomes of acute pain, chronic pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life or occupational effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of evidence regarding interventions for frostbite injuries. Very low-quality evidence from a single small trial indicates that iloprost, and iloprost plus rtPA, in combination with buflomedil may reduce the need for amputation in people with severe frostbite compared to buflomedil alone. However, buflomedil has been withdrawn from use. High quality randomised trials are needed to establish firm evidence for the treatment of frostbite injuries.


Asunto(s)
Congelación de Extremidades/terapia , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Sesgo , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Epoprostenol/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Pirrolidinas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Recalentamiento/métodos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación
13.
Trials ; 21(1): 601, 2020 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32611377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Septic shock remains a significant cause of death in critically ill patients. During septic shock, some patients will retain microcirculatory disorders despite optimal hemodynamic support (i.e., fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes). Alterations in the microcirculation are a key pathophysiological factor of organ dysfunction and death in septic shock patients. Ilomedin is a prostacyclin analog with vasodilatory effect and anti-thrombotic properties (i.e., inhibition of platelet aggregation) preferentially at the microcirculatory level. We hypothesize that early utilization of intravenous Ilomedin in septic shock patients with clinical persistence of microperfusion disorders would improve the recovery of organ dysfunction. METHODS: The I-MICRO trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. We plan to recruit 236 adult patients with septic shock and persistent microcirculatory disorders (i.e., skin mottling or increased capillary refill time) despite hemodynamic support. Participants will be randomized to receive a 48-h intravenous infusion of either Ilomedin or placebo starting at the earliest 6 h and later 24 h after septic shock. The primary outcome will be the change (delta) of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score between randomization and day 7. Secondary outcomes will include mean SOFA score during the first 7 days after randomization, mortality at day 28 post-randomization, number of ventilation-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, number of renal replacement therapy-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, number of vasopressor-free survival days in the 28 days post-randomization, and mottling score at day 1 after randomization. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ilomedin in patients with septic shock and persistent microcirculatory disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT NCT03788837 . Registered on 28 December 2018.


Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Microcirculación/efectos de los fármacos , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Método Doble Ciego , Francia , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Diab Vasc Dis Res ; 17(5): 1479164120930589, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589047

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many cases, Ilomedin® infusions are applied as part of a perioperative measure in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease because it makes a relevant vasodilatatory effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with/without peripheral neuropathy. AIMS: A prospective case-control study was performed to investigate the effect of prostanoids on peripheral resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the role of peripheral neuropathy in patients undergoing arterial reconstruction. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing arterial reconstruction were enrolled. Sufficient data were collected on 38 patients. Prior to surgery, peripheral nerve conduction velocity was measured. Blood flow volume at the common femoral artery was assessed intraoperatively using a Doppler flowmeter at four time points: at baseline before arterial reconstruction (T0), after reconstruction (T1), after 5 (T2) and 10 min (T3) after intra-arterial application of 3000 ng of Ilomedin. Peripheral resistance units were calculated as a function of mean arterial pressure and flow volume using the following formula: peripheral resistance unit = mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) / flow volume (mL/min). RESULTS: Ilomedin produced an immediate and significant drop of peripheral resistance in patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with peripheral neuropathy showed a less pronounced effect to Ilomedin compared to individuals with normal nerve conduction velocity.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Resistencia Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Vasodilatadores/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 68: 426-433, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out if intra-arterial intraoperative iloprost administration, in selected patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures, could lead to better results compared with a control group of patients with similar clinical background and risk factors. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid revascularization in the period from June 2017 to August 2019, which were then retrospectively analyzed. Those patients were divided into 2 groups: iloprost and control groups. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the presence of an arteriography that included the foot; Rutherford class 4-6; and Rutherford class 3 with at least 2 cardiovascular risk factors or previous revascularization procedures on the same limb. The intraoperative intra-arterial administration of iloprost was the inclusion criterion for the iloprost group. Patients with a compromised cardiological condition were excluded, as this was a contraindication for iloprost administration. Patients from the 2 groups were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology of Rosenbaum and Rubin. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary outcomes were limb salvage and overall survival. RESULTS: During the mentioned period, we treated 190 consecutive limbs. The mean follow-up was 11.73 months (median, 10; interquartile range, 5-19). After PSM, the freedom from TLR was significantly better in the iloprost group (78 ± 7%, 74 ± 8%, and 63 ± 9% vs. 67 ± 8%, 50 ± 9%, and 38 ± 10% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.043). No significant difference was found in terms of limb salvage (92 ± 5%, 88 ± 6%, and 88 ± 6% vs. 92 ± 4%, 85 ± 6%, and 81 ± 7% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.52) and survival (95 ± 3%, 95 ± 3%, and 95 ± 3% vs. 95 ± 4%, 92 ± 5%, and 71 ± 9% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = 0.14) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to encourage considering intraoperative use of this adjunct, at least in endovascular revascularization procedures, to improve distal outflow.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Vasodilatadores/efectos adversos
16.
Anesth Analg ; 131(2): 527-536, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catecholamine inotropes are frequently used after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) but may have undesirable effects. The aim was to identify whether the routine use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators might reduce the requirement for inotrope drugs after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of sequential patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the Royal Melbourne Hospital performed by a single surgeon and anesthesia care team, within 14 months before and after routine implementation of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, August 2017. Milrinone 4 mg and iloprost 20 µg were inhaled using a vibrating mesh nebulizer (Aerogen) before initiation of CPB and at chest closure. Other aspects of clinical management were unaltered over the time period. Two investigators blinded to each other extracted data from electronic and written medical records. The primary outcome was any use of inotropes in the perioperative period; a Fisher exact test was used to analyze any differences between the 2 groups. Demographic data, hemodynamic data, and use of inotropes and vasopressors were collected from induction of anesthesia to 36 hours postoperative in the intensive care unit (ICU). Hospital and ICU length of stay, cost, and complications were collected. RESULTS: Any use of inotropes was significantly lower with inhaled pulmonary dilators (62.5% vs 86.8%, odds ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}], 0.253 (0.083-0.764); P = .011), including intraoperative inotrope use (37.5% vs 86.8%, odds ratio [95% CI], 0.091 (0.03-0.275); P < .001). ICU length of stay was significantly lower with inhaled pulmonary dilators (45 hours, interquartile range [IQR], 27-65 vs 50 hours, IQR, 45-74; P = .026). There were no significant differences among major postoperative complications or costs between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of inhaled milrinone 4 mg and iloprost 20 µg before and after CPB is associated with reduced postoperative inotrope use.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Milrinona/administración & dosificación , Contracción Miocárdica/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contracción Miocárdica/fisiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Trials ; 21(1): 242, 2020 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32131881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is caused by rapid-onset (within hours) acute inflammatory processes in lung tissue, and it is a life-threatening condition with high mortality. The treatment of ARDS to date is focused on the prevention of further iatrogenic damage of the lung rather than the treatment of the initial inflammatory process. Several preclinical studies have revealed a beneficial effect of iloprost on the control of pulmonary inflammation, and in a small number of patients with ARDS, iloprost treatment resulted in improved oxygenation. Therefore, we plan to conduct a large multicenter trial to evaluate the effect of iloprost on ARDS. METHODS: The Therapeutic Iloprost during ARDS trial (ThIlo trial) is a multicenter, randomized, single blinded, clinical phase II trial assessing the efficacy of inhaled iloprost for the prevention of the development and progression of ARDS in critically ill patients. One hundred fifty critically ill patients suffering from acute ARDS will be treated either by nebulized iloprost or NaCl 0.9% for 5 days. Blood samples will be drawn at defined time points to elucidate the serum levels of iloprost and inflammatory markers during treatment. Mechanical ventilation will be standardized. In follow-up visits at days 28 and 90 as well as 6 months after enrollment, functional status according to the Barthel Index and a health care-related questionnaire, and frailty (Vulnerable Elders Survey) will be evaluated. The primary endpoint is the improvement of oxygenation, defined as the ratio of PaO2/FiO2. Secondary endpoints include 90-day all-cause mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores during the study period up to day 90, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia, delirium, ICU-acquired weakness, and discharge localization. The study will be conducted in three university ARDS centers in Germany. DISCUSSION: The results of the ThIlo trial will highlight the anti-inflammatory effect of iloprost on early inflammatory processes during ARDS, resulting in the improvement of outcome parameters in patients with ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRA-CT: 2016-003168-37. Registered on 12 April 2017. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03111212. Registered on 4 June 2017.


Asunto(s)
Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Alemania , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasodilatadores/efectos adversos
18.
Anesth Analg ; 130(5): 1407-1414, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ventilation/perfusion mismatch in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients can exacerbate cardiac function as well as pulmonary oxygenation. We hypothesized that inhaled iloprost can ameliorate pulmonary oxygenation with lung mechanics and myocardial function during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in COPD patients combined with poor lung oxygenation. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with moderate to severe COPD, who exhibited the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) <150 mm Hg 30 minutes after initiating OLV, were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into either ILO group (n = 20) or Control group (n = 20), in which iloprost (20 µg) and saline were inhaled, respectively. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio, dead space, dynamic compliance, and tissue Doppler imaging with myocardial performance index (MPI) were assessed 30 minutes after initiating OLV (pre-Tx) and 30 minutes after completion of drug inhalation (post-Tx). Repeated variables were analyzed using a linear mixed-model between the groups. RESULTS: At pre-Tx, no differences were observed in measured parameters between the groups. At post-Tx, PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P < .001) and dynamic compliance (P = .023) were significantly higher and dead space ventilation was significantly lower (P = .001) in iloprost group (ILO group) compared to Control group. Left (P = .003) and right ventricular MPIs (P < .001) significantly decreased in ILO group compared to Control group. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled iloprost improved pulmonary oxygenation, lung mechanics, and cardiac function simultaneously during OLV in COPD patients with poor lung oxygenation.


Asunto(s)
Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Ventilación Unipulmonar/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Mecánica Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Ventilación Pulmonar/efectos de los fármacos , Ventilación Pulmonar/fisiología , Mecánica Respiratoria/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Clin Respir J ; 14(7): 611-621, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute vasoreactivity testing (AVT) which reflects the compliance of the pulmonary vascular bed has been proven to be of prognostic value. The purpose of the present study is to explore the sex differences of hemodynamics during the AVT and their impact on event-free survival in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS: Eighty-six patients underwent a right heart catheterization and AVT at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from February 2009 to February 2018. Univariate and multiple stepwise regression analysis were performed to determine the predictors of independent event-free survival, and receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the cut-off value of independent parameters in CTEPH. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in both demographics and hemodynamics between male and female patients with CTEPH. Except ΔPVR/PVR showed a significantly higher difference in female than male patients (P = 0.034). Male patients had higher mRAP of pre- and post-AVT than female patients in the event-free subgroup, while, female patients showed higher PVR of pre-AVT than male patients in the event subgroup (P < 0.05). The mRAP and SvO2 were independent predictors of event-free survival in female patients both before and after the AVT, whereas ΔSvO2 was an independent predictor of event-free survival in male patients. CONCLUSION: Hemodynamics during the AVT varied between male and female patients with CTEPH. Both sexes displayed unique hemodynamic responses that were independently able to predict event-free survival. Therefore, better estimates of prognosis in CTEPH can be made when sex differences are also taken into consideration.


Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica/fisiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , China/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Iloprost/farmacología , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Presión Esfenoidal Pulmonar/fisiología , Curva ROC , Análisis de Regresión , Caracteres Sexuales , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatadores/farmacología
20.
J Crit Care ; 56: 197-202, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945586

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This is a predefined sub-study of the Endothelial Dysfunction in Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (ENDO-RCA) trial. We aim to investigate Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, safety by evaluating change in whole blood platelet aggregometry (Multiplate) in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients from baseline to 96-h post randomization. METHODS: A randomized, placebo controlled double-blinded trial in 46 OHCA patients. Patients were allocated 1:2 to 48 h Iloprost infusion, (1 ng/kg/min) or placebo (saline infusion). Platelet aggregation was determined by platelet aggregation tests ASPI-test (arachidonic acid); TRAP-test (thrombin-receptor activating peptide (TRAP)-6; RISTO test (Ristocetin); ADP test (adenosin diphosphat). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the iloprost and placebo groups according to ASPI, TRAP, RISTO and ADP platelet aggregation assays. Further, no significant differences regarding risk of bleeding were found between groups (Risk of bleeding: ASPI <40 U; TRAP <92 U; RISTO <35 U; ADP <50 U). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the iloprost infusion did not influence platelet aggregation as evaluated by the ASPI, TRAP, RISTO and ADP assays. There was no increased risk of bleeding or transfusion therapy. A decline in platelet aggregation was observed for the ASPI and ADP assays during the initial 96 h after OHCA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02685618) on 18-02-2016.


Asunto(s)
Coma/complicaciones , Iloprost/administración & dosificación , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/sangre , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...