RESUMEN
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Vacunas , Sistemas de Salud/organización & administración , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Cuarentena/organización & administración , Aislamiento Social , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Industria del Tabaco/éticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: China is the largest producer and consumer of tobacco products worldwide. While direct marketing and advertisement of tobacco products is restricted, indirect marketing still exists under the guise of sponsorship and corporate social responsibility (CSR). This case study is focused on tobacco industry-sponsored elementary schools in Chinese rural areas. METHODS: Field visits were conducted in Yunnan province to interview students, teachers, school principals and parents to understand their perceptions of the tobacco industry and its sponsorship of schools. Interviews with tobacco control activists were conducted in Beijing to discuss national tobacco control efforts targeting tobacco industry sponsorship. Interview data were transcribed and coded, with key themes developed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: While health consequences of smoking are generally known, attitudes towards the tobacco industry and its CSR activities remain positive among the general public. Educators and parents do not perceive any impacts on schoolchildren from exposure to 'pro-tobacco propaganda' created by the industry's CSR activities. Attitudes among tobacco control activists were drastically different, with consensus that CSR activities constitute indirect marketing attempts that should be banned. CONCLUSION: National tobacco control legislation banning all forms of indirect marketing including CSR is needed in order to protect the health of future generations.
Asunto(s)
Apoyo Financiero/ética , Propaganda , Instituciones Académicas/economía , Industria del Tabaco/economía , Industria del Tabaco/ética , Fumar Tabaco/economía , Fumar Tabaco/psicología , Adulto , Niño , China , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres/psicología , Maestros/psicología , Responsabilidad SocialRESUMEN
The tobacco industry's involvement in the electronic cigarette research that informs public health policy is controversial. On the one hand, some are concerned that their involvement presents conflicts of interest that bias research outputs and invalidate the policies that use them. On the other hand, some have argued that the tobacco industry may support valid research and contribute to the goals of public health, for instance, if the interests of the e-cigarette industry could be part of a tobacco smoking cessation policy. We approach this debate from the ethical perspective of the public interest and the public good, considering how legitimate researchers can square their expert opinion with validating tobacco industry-funded research, given the perfidy of the tobacco industry and paucity of robust, conclusive evidence on the public health impacts of liberalizing e-cigarette use.
Asunto(s)
Conflicto de Intereses , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Ética en Investigación , Salud Pública/ética , Política Pública , Industria del Tabaco/ética , Sesgo , Testimonio de Experto , Humanos , Investigadores/éticaAsunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/ética , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Salud Ambiental , Industria del Petróleo y Gas , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/ética , Investigación Biomédica/economía , Salud Global , Humanos , Industria del Petróleo y Gas/economía , Industria del Petróleo y Gas/ética , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Sociedades Médicas/economía , Sociedades Médicas/ética , Industria del Tabaco/economía , Industria del Tabaco/éticaAsunto(s)
Comunicación Persuasiva , Embalaje de Productos , Industria del Tabaco , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Maquiavelismo , Embalaje de Productos/ética , Embalaje de Productos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embalaje de Productos/métodos , Política Pública , Fumadores/psicología , Industria del Tabaco/ética , Industria del Tabaco/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of European countries implemented a point-of-sale (PoS) display ban on tobacco products. This study assessed the association between PoS display bans in Europe and adolescent smoking and perceived accessibility of tobacco, 2-6 years after PoS display ban implementation. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental design, we compared individuals in countries that did and countries that did not implement a PoS display ban, before and after implementation. We used repeated cross-sectional data of 174 878 15-year-old and 16-year-old adolescents from 25 countries from the 2007, 2011 and 2015 European Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs surveys. Multilevel logistic regression models examined smoking behaviour (regular smoking vs other) and perceived access (easy vs difficult) as a function of display ban implementation and controlled for survey year, gender, parental education and implementation of other tobacco control policies. Interaction with gender was tested. RESULTS: The implementation of a PoS display ban was associated with a 15% larger drop in the odds of regular smoking (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91), but was not significantly associated with perceived accessibility of tobacco (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.892 to 1.03). Associations were similar in males and females (cross-level interactions of gender with display ban were not statistically significant for either outcome). CONCLUSION: The implementation of PoS display bans in Europe was associated with a stronger decrease in regular smoking among adolescents. This decrease does not appear to be driven by a decreasing accessibility of tobacco, but might be caused by further de-normalisation of tobacco as a result of PoS display bans.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Comercio , Mercadotecnía , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar , Industria del Tabaco , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Publicidad , Comercio/ética , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comercio/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mercadotecnía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mercadotecnía/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Política Pública , Industria del Tabaco/ética , Industria del Tabaco/métodosRESUMEN
The Foundation for a Smoke-Free World was launched in September 2017 with an announced 12-year funding commitment of $1 billion from Philip Morris International (PMI). The Foundation claims that its governing documents (certificate of incorporation, bylaws and a pledge agreement) ensure that it has an independent research agenda and stringent protections from conflicts of interest. We analysed the text of these governing documents. Their provisions have multiple loopholes, particularly regarding conflicts of interest. Further, these documents cannot substitute for other important documentation such as information about PMI's internal business case for investing $1 billion in the Foundation, an unwaivable conflict of interest policy, annual disclosure statements, copies of pre-Foundation establishment correspondence between key individuals, all signed contracts or salary information, none of which, as of July 2018, the Foundation has made publicly available. Even if these were released, however, it is problematic that the Foundation's fundamental purpose was decided on and its leader selected following a tobacco company-paid, privately negotiated arrangement with the Foundation's president. It cannot be regarded as independent.
Asunto(s)
Comercio , Industria del Tabaco , Comercio/ética , Comercio/métodos , Comercio/tendencias , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/normas , Fundaciones/organización & administración , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Industria del Tabaco/economía , Industria del Tabaco/ética , Industria del Tabaco/métodos , Industria del Tabaco/tendencias , Productos de Tabaco/economíaRESUMEN
The manufacture, use, and marketing of tobacco present a serious threat to children's right to health. This makes the Convention on the Rights of the Child a potentially powerful tobacco-control tool and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), which oversees the convention's implementation, a potential leader in tobacco control. UNICEF actively supported tobacco control initiatives in the late 1990s, but since the early 2000s UNICEF's role in tobacco control has been minimal. Using the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents library, an online collection of previously secret tobacco industry documents, we sought to uncover information on the tobacco industry's ties with UNICEF. We found that from 1997 to 2000, when UNICEF was actively promoting tobacco control to support children's rights, the tobacco industry saw children's rights and UNICEF as potentially powerful threats to business that needed to be closely monitored and neutralized. The industry then positioned itself as a partner with UNICEF on youth smoking prevention initiatives as a way to avoid meaningful tobacco control measures that could save children's lives. After UNICEF's corporate engagement guidelines were loosened in 2003, tobacco companies successfully engaged with UNICEF directly and via front groups, including the Eliminating Child Labour in Tobacco Growing Foundation. This was part of an overall tobacco industry strategy to improve its corporate image, infiltrate the United Nations, and weaken global tobacco-control efforts. As part of its mission to protect children's rights, UNICEF should end all partnerships with the tobacco industry and its front groups.