Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.819
Filtrar
1.
Kyobu Geka ; 77(6): 450-453, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009540

RESUMEN

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pacemaker infection after generator-exchange. Eight years ago, she underwent mitral and tricuspid valve replacement and had biventricular pacing with three pairs of epicardial leads placed in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle for left ventricular dysfunction. Skin perforation due to infection was detected 1 month after generator-exchange. At first, antibiotic treatment, generator-re-exchange, and pocket repositioning surgery were performed. Following all these failed attempts, a temporary pacemaker was placed, the infected generator was removed, and the lead was cut short. Eight days later, new intravenous caradiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation was performed. However, despite the repeat debridement, infection at the lead stumps recurred. Moreover, plain chest computed tomography (CT) revealed an abscess around the leads in the anterior mediastinum. Eventually, leads were removed under extracorporeal circulation via re-sternotomy. Postoperative course was uneventful, and she has been doing well without recurrence of infection for 6 years after operation.


Asunto(s)
Marcapaso Artificial , Esternotomía , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 411: 132264, 2024 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in patients with CIED infections, including both systemic and localized pocket infection. The aim of the study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of evidence relating to the effect of complete CIED extraction in patients with a CIED infection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting short- and mid-term outcomes in patients who had a device infection or infective endocarditis (IE) and underwent complete removal of the cardiac device (generator and leads) compared to those who received conservative therapy (no removal, partial removal, local antibiotic infiltration or isolated antibiotic therapy). The primary outcome was reinfection/relapse. Secondary outcomes were short-term (30-day/in-hospital) and mid-term (mean follow-up: 43.0 months) mortality. Random effects model was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Patients with complete CIED extraction (n = 905) exhibited a lower rate of relapse/re-infection compared to patients (n = 195) with a conservative treatment approach (n = 195, OR 0.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.06, p < 0.0001, mean-follow-up: 16.1 months). Additionally, these patients displayed a lower short- (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.69, p = 0.01) and mid-term (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.34-0.78, p = 0.002) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that patients with a CIED infection who undergo complete CIED extraction exhibit a lower rate of relapse/re-infection. Additionally, a lower short- and mid-term mortality is observed, although it is acknowledged that this outcome may be influenced by treatment allocation bias.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
3.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(5): 425-429, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689572

RESUMEN

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Condrosarcoma , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/terapia , Oncología Médica , Ortopedia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reoperación
4.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(7): 1039-1050, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691077

RESUMEN

Infections remain a significant concern in patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS), encompassing both durable and acute devices. This consensus manuscript provides updated definitions for infections associated with durable MCS devices and new definitions for infections in acute MCS, integrating a comprehensive review of existing literature and collaborative discussions among multidisciplinary specialists. By establishing consensus definitions, we seek to enhance clinical care, facilitate consistent reporting in research studies, and ultimately improve outcomes for patients receiving MCS.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón-Pulmón , Consenso
5.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(13): 1197-1204, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools for monitoring the impact and outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is not well described. This study analyzed the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in a prospective observational cohort of patients with hip or knee PJI. METHODS: The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed PJI from multiple centers. The OHS and OKS were evaluated at PJI diagnosis (baseline) and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Scores and score changes were examined according to PJI type, patient characteristics, and management. A successful functional outcome at 12 months was defined as an OHS of >38 or OHS of >36 and/or an improvement from baseline of >12 or >9, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 741 participants, PROMs were available at 12 months for 233 with hip and 342 with knee PJI. Significant improvements (p < 0.0001) were seen at 12 months for both the OHS (24.5 to 36) and OKS (25 to 34), with no further improvement at 24 months. Patients with late-acute PJI had a higher median baseline OHS (35; interquartile range [22 to 46]) and OKS (30 [18 to 41]) than those with early PJI (OHS: 19 [15 to 29]; OKS: 22 [16 to 29.5]) or chronic PJI (OHS: 23 [14 to 34]; OKS 22 [14 to 28]). Logistic regression showed that a clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.76, p = 0.001) and early PJI (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.64 to 4.07, p < 0.0001) independently predicted a successful functional outcome. Chronic renal impairment (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.71, p = 0.007), congestive cardiac failure (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.95, p = 0.04), and clinical signs of inflammation (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.85, p = 0.009) at diagnosis independently predicted failure to achieve a successful functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The OHS and OKS varied significantly at baseline and 12 months according to PJI type, emphasizing the need to consider the PJI type when evaluating treatment success. This study highlights superior functional outcomes associated with early PJI and with achievement of a clinical cure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Australia , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nueva Zelanda , Anciano de 80 o más Años
6.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 26(7): 767-775, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806975

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the epidemiology, clinical traits, and diagnosis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Infective Endocarditis (TAVR-IE) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair infective endocarditis (TEER-IE), focusing on a multimodal imaging approach. It addresses the rising prevalence of TAVR and TEER, emphasizing the need to understand long-term complications and clinical consequences, which poses significant challenges despite advancements in valve technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies report a variable incidence of TAVR-IE and TEER-IE influenced by diverse patient risk profiles and procedural factors. Younger age, male gender, and certain comorbidities emerge as patient-related risk factors. Procedure-related factors include intervention location, valve type, and technical aspects. Microbiologically, Staphylococcus aureus, Viridans Group Streptococcus, and Enterococcus are frequently encountered pathogens. TAVR-IE and TEER-IE diagnosis involves a multimodal imaging approach due to limitations in echocardiography. Blood cultures and imaging aid identification, with Fluorescence in situ hybridization is showing promise. Treatment encompasses medical management with antibiotics and, when necessary, surgical intervention. The management approach requires a multidisciplinary "Endocarditis Team." This review underscores the need for continued research to refine risk prediction, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and optimize management strategies for TAVR-IE, considering the evolving landscape of transcatheter interventions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Endocarditis/microbiología , Endocarditis/etiología
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792972

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Despite the promise of phage therapy (PT), its efficacy in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management is unknown. Much of the current literature is largely limited to case reports and series. Materials and Methods: In order to help inform power calculations for future clinical trials and comparative analyses, we performed a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of early PT outcomes to provide a preliminary assessment of early phage therapy treatment outcomes for cases of PJI. Results: In a search of available literature across MEDLINE (Ovid, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), the Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate, London, UK), and Cochrane Central (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA) up to 23 September 2023, we identified 37 patients with PJIs receiving adjunctive PT. Patients most frequently reported Staphylococcal species infection (95%) and intraarticular phage delivery (73%). Phage cocktail (65%) and antibiotic co-administration (97%) were common. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis suggested infection remission in 78% of patients (95% CI: 39%, 95%) (I2 = 55%, p = 0.08) and 83% with a minimum 12-month follow-up (95% CI: 53%, 95%) (I2 = 26%, p = 0.26). Conclusions: Our study provides a preliminary estimate of PT's efficacy in PJIs and informs future comparative studies.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Fagos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Terapia de Fagos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(15): 1418-1430, 2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599718

RESUMEN

During the past 6 decades, there have been numerous changes in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), currently affecting an older population and increasing in incidence in patients with transcatheter-implanted valves. Significant microbiologic (molecular biology) and imaging diagnostic (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) advances have been incorporated into the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria, thus increasing the diagnostic sensitivity for PVE without sacrificing specificity in validation studies. PVE is a life-threatening disease requiring management by multidisciplinary endocarditis teams in cardiac centers to improve outcomes. Novel surgical options are now available, and an increasing set of patients may avoid surgical intervention despite indication. Selected patients may complete parenteral or oral antimicrobial treatment at home. Finally, patients with prosthetic valves implanted surgically or by the transcatheter approach are candidates for antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicaciones , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos
9.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 17(4): e016435, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626096

RESUMEN

Heart valve replacement has steadily increased over the past decades due to improved surgical mortality, an aging population, and the increasing use of transcatheter valve technology. With these developments, prosthetic valve complications, including prosthetic valve endocarditis, are increasingly encountered. In this review, we aim to characterize the manifestations of prosthetic valve endocarditis using representative case studies from our institution to highlight the advances and contributions of modern multimodality imaging techniques.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Anciano , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Endocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Imagen Multimodal , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia
10.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 36(6)2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446027
12.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 55(2): 193-206, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403366

RESUMEN

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common complications after total joint arthroplasty. It is challenging to manage, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and is a financial burden on the health care system. Failure of 2-stage management for chronic PJI is not uncommon. Repeat infections are oftentimes polymicrobial, multiple drug-resistant microorganisms, or new organisms. Optimizing the success of index 2-stage revision is the greatest prevention against failure of any subsequent management options and requires a robust team-based approach.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Reoperación , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 55(2): 151-159, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403362

RESUMEN

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a common procedure performed throughout the entire world in hopes of alleviating debilitating hip or knee pain. The projected number of TJAs performed in the United States alone is projected to exceed 1.9 million by 2030 and 5 million by 2040. With the significant increase in TJA performed, more periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are likely to be encountered. PJIs are a devastating complication of TJA. The economic and clinical burden must be understood and respected to minimize occurrence and allow optimal patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Articulación de la Rodilla , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 55(2): 161-169, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403363

RESUMEN

Prosthetic joint infection following total joint arthroplasty is a devastating complication, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality for the patient. The formation of a biofilm on implanted hardware contributes to the difficulty in successful identification and eradication of the infection. Antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention are necessary for addressing this condition; we present a discussion on different treatment options, including those that are not yet routinely utilized in the clinical setting or are under investigation, to highlight the present and future of PJI management.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Biopelículas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia
15.
J ISAKOS ; 9(3): 353-361, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272392

RESUMEN

Early periprosthetic joint infection constitutes one of the most frightening complications of joint replacement. Recently, some evidence has highlighted the potential link between dysregulation of the gut microbiota and degenerative diseases of joints. It has been hypothesized that microbiome dysbiosis may increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection by facilitating bacterial translocation from these sites to the bloodstream or by impairing local or systemic immune responses. Although the processes tying the gut microbiome to infection susceptibility are still unknown, new research suggests that the presurgical gut microbiota-a previously unconsidered component-may influence the patient's ability to resist infection. Exploring the potential impact of the microbiome on periprosthetic joint infections may therefore bring new insights into the pathogenesis and therapy of these disorders. For a successful therapy, a proper surgical procedure in conjunction with an antibacterial concept is essential. As per the surgical approach, different treatment strategies include surgical irrigation, debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention with or without polyethylene exchange. Other alternatives could be one-stage or two-stage revisions surgery. Interventions that either directly target gut microbes as well as interventions that modify the composition and/or function of the commensal microbes represent an innovative and potentially successful field to be explored. In recent times, innovative therapeutic methods have arisen in the realm of microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related ailments. These progressive approaches offer fresh perspectives on tackling intricate microbial imbalances in the gastrointestinal tract. These emerging therapies signify a shift towards more precise and individualized approaches to microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related disorders. Once a more advanced knowledge of the pathways linking the gut microbiota to musculoskeletal tissues is gained, relevant microbiome-based therapies can be developed. If dysbiosis is proven to be a significant contributor, developing treatments for dysbiosis may represent a new frontier in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Disbiosis , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Disbiosis/microbiología , Disbiosis/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Desbridamiento/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/efectos adversos , Prótesis Articulares/microbiología , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversos
16.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(7): 1876-1881, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rise of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to aging populations is steadily increasing the number of arthroplasties and treatment costs. This study analyzed the direct health care costs of PJI for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically screened for direct costs of PJI in Europe. Publications that defined the joint site and the procedure performed were further analyzed. Mean direct health care costs were calculated for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage, and 2-stage revisions for hip and knee PJI, respectively. Costs were adjusted for inflation rates and reported in US-Dollar (USD). RESULTS: Of 1,374 eligible publications, 12 manuscripts were included in the final analysis after an abstract and full-text review. Mean direct costs of $32,933 were identified for all types of revision procedures for knee PJI. The mean direct treatment cost including DAIR for TKA after PJI was $19,476. For 2-stage revisions of TKA, the mean total cost was $37,980. For all types of hip PJI procedures, mean direct hospital costs were $28,904. For hip DAIR, one-stage and 2-stage treatment average costs of $7,120, $44,594, and $42,166 were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic joint infections are associated with substantial direct health care costs. As detailed reports on the cost of PJI are scarce and of limited quality, more detailed financial data on the cost of PJI treatment are urgently required.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Costos de Hospital , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/economía , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/economía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Desbridamiento/economía
17.
Knee ; 47: 13-20, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171207

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an uncommon, yet serious, complication. There is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in this setting. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of DAIR for acute UKR PJI. METHOD: Between 2006 and 2019, 5195 UKR were performed at our institution. Over this period, sixteen patients underwent DAIR for early, acute PJI. All patients met MSIS PJI diagnostic criteria. The median age at DAIR was 67 years (range 40-73) and 12 patients were male (75.0%). The median time to DAIR was 24 days (range 6-60). Patients were followed up for a median of 6.5 years (range1.4-10.5) following DAIR. RESULTS: 0.3% (16/5195) of UKR in our institution had a DAIR within 3 months. 15 of 16 patients (93.8%) were culture positive, with the most common organism MSSA (n = 8, 50.0%). Patients were treated with an organism-specific intravenous antibiotic regime for a median of 6 weeks, followed by oral antibiotics for a median duration of 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier survivor estimate for revision for PJI was 57% (95%CI: 28-78%) at five years, and survivor estimate for all cause revision 52% (95%CI: 25-74%).The median Oxford Knee Score for patients with a viable implant at final follow-up was 45 points (range 39-46). CONCLUSION: Early, acute PJI after UKR is rare. DAIR had a moderate success rate, with infection-free survivorship of 57% at 5 years. Those successfully treated with DAIR had excellent functional outcome and implant survival.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Desbridamiento , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Masculino , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Adulto , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Retención de la Prótesis , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Psychosom Res ; 177: 111559, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134736

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following joint replacement surgeries. While the somatic impacts of PJI have been extensively explored, the influence on mental health remains understudied. This study aimed to longitudinally assess the psychological burden, quality of life, and expectations in individuals undergoing treatment for PJI. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at a German trauma center between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients diagnosed with PJI (n = 29, mean age 71.4 ± 8.8 years) were assessed at five timepoints, within one week before revision surgery, one month, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. Outcomes included the ICD-10 symptom-rating (ISR), German Short-Form 36 (SF-36), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and an expectation questionnaire. RESULTS: Psychological scores exhibited significant upward trends over time. The ISR score increased from 0.55 preoperatively to 0.87 at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.002), surpassing the clinically relevant threshold. Depression and anxiety scores peaked at 6 months (1.6, p = 0.005) and 12 months (1.12, p = 0.001), respectively. Quality of life, measured by SF-36, showed stable physical component summary scores but declining mental component summary scores. Patients' expectations of returning to normal health consistently decreased (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing treatment for PJI experience significant psychological burden, with implications for quality of life and expectations of recovery. The findings underscore the importance of addressing psychological well-being in the management of PJI and emphasize the need for comprehensive care strategies that encompass both somatic and psychological dimensions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Salud Mental , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 15(6): 902-909, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38045589

RESUMEN

Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) represent a serious complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are associated with significant morbidity. While recent data suggest that Enterobacter cloacae is an emerging source of PJI, characteristics and outcomes of E. cloacae-associated infections are rarely described. The study aimed to present and describe the findings and outcomes of E. cloacae-associated PJI in our department. Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study of patients who underwent revision THA for E. cloacae-associated PJI between 2011 and 2020 and has a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes included organism characteristics as well as clinical outcomes, represented by the number of reoperations needed for PJI eradication and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool score. Of 108 revision THAs, 12 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed with E. cloacae-associated PJI. Results: The majority of cases had a polymicrobial PJI (n=8, 66.7%). Five E. cloacae strains (41.7%) were gentamicin-resistant. Six patients (50.0%) underwent 2 or more revisions, while 3 of them (25.0%) required 4 or more revisions until their PJI was resolved. When utilizing the MSIS outcome score, the first surgical intervention was considered successful (MSIS score tiers 1 and 2) for 5 patients (41.7%) and failed (tiers 3 and 4) for 7 patients (58.3%). Conclusions: E. cloacae is emerging as a common source of PJI following hip arthroplasty procedures. The findings of our study suggest that this pathogen is primarily of polymicrobial nature and represents high virulence and poor postoperative outcomes, as represented by both an increased number of required revision procedures and high rates of patients with MSIS outcome scores of 3 and 4. When managing patients with E. cloacae-associated PJI, surgeons should consider these characteristics and inform patients regarding predicted outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Enterobacter cloacae , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artritis Infecciosa/etiología , Artritis Infecciosa/terapia , Reoperación/métodos
20.
Bone Joint J ; 105-B(12): 1294-1302, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035600

RESUMEN

Aims: A higher failure rate has been reported in haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to non-haematogenous PJI. The reason for this difference is unknown. We investigated the outcome of haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI to analyze the risk factors for failure in both groups of patients. Methods: Episodes of knee or hip PJI (defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria) treated at our institution between January 2015 and October 2020 were included in a retrospective PJI cohort. Episodes with a follow-up of > one year were stratified by route of infection into haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI. Probability of failure-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between groups using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis was applied to assess risk factors for failure. Results: A total of 305 PJI episodes (174 hips, 131 knees) were allocated to the haematogenous (n = 146) or the non-haematogenous group (n = 159). Among monomicrobial infections, Staphylococcus aureus was the dominant pathogen in haematogenous PJI (76/140, 54%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in non-haematogenous PJI (57/133, 43%). In both groups, multi-stage exchange (n = 55 (38%) in haematogenous and n = 73 (46%) in non-haematogenous PJI) and prosthesis retention (n = 70 (48%) in haematogenous and n = 48 (30%) in non-haematogenous PJI) were the most common surgical strategies. Median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 13.5 weeks (range, 0.5 to 218 weeks) and similar in both groups. After six years of follow-up, the probability of failure-free survival was significantly lower in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous PJI (55% vs 74%; p = 0.021). Infection-related mortality was significantly higher in haematogenous than non-haematogenous PJI (7% vs 0% episodes; p = 0.001). Pathogenesis of failure was similar in both groups. Retention of the prosthesis was the only independent risk factor for failure in multivariate analysis in both groups. Conclusion: Treatment failure was significantly higher in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous PJI. Retention of the prosthesis was the only independent risk factor for failure in both groups.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...