Development of a novel rodent rapid serial visual presentation task reveals dissociable effects of stimulant versus nonstimulant treatments on attentional processes.

The rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task and continuous performance tasks (CPT) are used to assess attentional impairments in patients with psychiatric and neurological conditions. This study developed a novel touchscreen task for rats based on the structure of a human RSVP task and used pharmacological manipulations to investigate their effects on different performance measures. Normal animals were trained to respond to a target image and withhold responding to distractor images presented within a continuous sequence. In a second version of the task, a false-alarm image was included, so performance could be assessed relative to two types of nontarget distractors. The effects of acute administration of stimulant and nonstimulant treatments for ADHD (amphetamine and atomoxetine) were tested in both tasks. Methylphenidate, ketamine, and nicotine were tested in the first task only. Amphetamine made animals more impulsive and decreased overall accuracy but increased accuracy when the target was presented early in the image sequence. Atomoxetine improved accuracy overall with a specific reduction in false-alarm responses and a shift in the attentional curve reflecting improved accuracy for targets later in the image sequence. However, atomoxetine also slowed responding and increased omissions. Ketamine, nicotine, and methylphenidate had no specific effects at the doses tested. These results suggest that stimulant versus nonstimulant treatments have different effects on attention and impulsive behaviour in this rat version of an RSVP task. These results also suggest that RSVP-like tasks have the potential to be used to study attention in rodents.

Influence of Contingent and Noncontingent Drug Histories on the Development of High Levels of MDPV Self-Administration.

A subset of rats that self-administer 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) develop unusually high levels of drug taking. A history of responding maintained by cocaine, but not food, prevents the development of this high-responder phenotype; however, it is unclear how histories of noncontingent cocaine exposure or self-administering drugs from other pharmacological classes would affect its development. In the current studies, 5 groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were used to determine whether histories of responding maintained by drugs from different pharmacological classes (e.g., MDPV, cocaine, fentanyl, nicotine, or ketamine) would differentially impact the development of the high-responder phenotype when MDPV was available for self-administration. Two additional groups were used to determine whether noncontingent exposure to cocaine would prevent the development of the high-responder phenotype when MDPV was available for self-administration, and whether noncontingent exposure to MDPV would facilitate the development of the high-responder phenotype when cocaine was available for self-administration. Consistent with previous reports, a history of response-contingent cocaine, and to a lesser extent noncontingent cocaine, prevented the MDPV high-responder phenotype; however, when responding was initially maintained by fentanyl, nicotine, or ketamine, the MDPV high-responder phenotype developed in ∼45% of rats. By manipulating behavioral and pharmacological histories prior to evaluating MDPV self-administration, the current studies provide additional evidence that a history of response-contingent (or noncontingent) cocaine can prevent the transition from well regulated to aberrant drug-taking when responding is maintained by MDPV. Although the mechanism(s) that underlies this novel high-responder phenotype are unknown, elucidation may provide insight into individual differences relating to substance use disorder. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A subset of outbred Sprague-Dawley rats self-administer high levels of the synthetic cathinone 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV). Understanding the behavioral and/or pharmacological factors that can prevent the development of dysregulated MDPV self-administration may provide insight into individual differences in vulnerability to develop a substance use disorder.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Pediatric Subjects With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Viloxazine extended-release capsules (viloxazine ER; Qelbree) is a novel nonstimulant, recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of ADHD in pediatrics. Here, we characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of viloxazine and its major metabolite, 5-HVLX-gluc, using a population PK model and evaluate the impact of 1-4 days of missed viloxazine ER doses on viloxazine PK. Data from 4 phase 3 trials in pediatric subjects treated with viloxazine ER were used to establish the PK model. Covariate analysis was conducted on the final base model. The impact of 1-4 days of missed doses on steady-state viloxazine PK was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. A 1-compartmental linear model with first-order absorption and elimination of the parent drug and first-order metabolite formation and elimination properly described the population PK of viloxazine and 5-HVLX-gluc. Body weight impacted the systemic exposure of viloxazine and 5-HVLX-gluc. Predicted PK parameters at steady state (mean ± standard deviation) in children receiving viloxazine ER were determined. Cmax was 1.60 ± 0.70 µg/mL at 100 mg, 2.83 ± 1.31 µg/mL at 200 mg, and 5.61 ± 2.48 µg/mL at 400 mg. AUC0-t was 19.29 ± 8.88 µg·h/mL at 100 mg, 34.72 ± 16.53 µg·h/mL at 200 mg, and 68.00 ± 28.51 µg·h/mL at 400 mg. PK parameters for adolescents receiving viloxazine ER were also determined. Cmax was 2.06 ± 0.90 µg/mL at 200 mg, 4.08 ± 1.67 µg/mL at 400 mg, and 6.49 ± 2.87 µg/mL at 600 mg. AUC0-t was 25.78 ± 11.55 µg·h/mL at 200 mg, 50.80 ± 19.76 µg·h/mL at 400 mg, and 79.97 ± 36.91 µg·h/mL at 600 mg. Simulations revealed that, regardless of the duration of the dosing interruption, viloxazine concentration returned to steady-state levels after approximately 2 days of once-daily dosing of viloxazine ER.

A Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Once-Daily Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

PURPOSE: This phase 3 clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of viloxazine extended-release capsules (VLX-ER) as a monotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents (12-17 years). METHODS: Eligible subjects (n = 310) were randomized to receive once-daily 200 and 400 mg VLX-ER, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline (CFB) at the end of study (EOS) in ADHD Rating Scale-5 Total score. Key secondary end points were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score at EOS, CFB at EOS in Conners 3-Parent Short Form Composite T-score, and CFB at EOS in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Total average score. RESULTS: In the 200-mg/d and 400-mg/d VLX-ER treatment groups, a significant improvement was found in the CFB at EOS in ADHD Rating Scale-5 Total (P = 0.0232, P = 0.0091) and Inattention (P = 0.0424, P = 0.0390) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (P = 0.0069, P = 0.0005) subscale scores versus placebo. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score was significantly improved at EOS in the 200-mg/d and 400-mg/d VLX-ER groups versus placebo (P = 0.0042, P = 0.0003). The Conners 3-Parent Short Form composite T-score and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Total average score exhibited improvement in both VLX-ER groups; however, the difference versus placebo was not statistically significant. The most common treatment-related adverse events were somnolence, headache, decreased appetite, nausea, and fatigue. The adverse event-related discontinuation rates were <5% in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Viloxazine extended-release demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in ADHD symptoms in adolescents and was generally well tolerated.

Viloxazine: Pediatric First Approval.

Viloxazine (QELBREE™), a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is being developed by Supernus Pharmaceuticals as a non-stimulant for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in pediatric and adult patients. This is a novel formulation of a pharmacological agent formerly marketed in Europe for the treatment of depression in adults. Viloxazine received its first pediatric approval in April 2021 in the USA for the treatment of ADHD in pediatric patients aged 6-17 years. Approval was based on positive results from a series of short-term phase III clinical trials in which viloxazine improved the severity of ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents with diagnosed ADHD. Viloxazine is available as extended-release capsules for once-daily oral administration. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of viloxazine leading to this first pediatric approval for ADHD.

Tapentadol results in less deterioration of gastrointestinal function and symptoms than standard opioid therapy in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Tapentadol is a combined opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with fewer gastrointestinal side effects at equianalgesic doses compared with classical strong opioids. Previous studies on tapentadol have included multi-morbid patients in whom confounders exclude detailed assessment of the mechanistic effects and strict comparison with other opioids or placebo. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tapentadol and oxycodone on gastrointestinal motility and gastrointestinal side effects. METHODS: 21 healthy males participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Tapentadol (50 mg twice daily), oxycodone (10 mg twice daily), or placebo tablets were administered for 14 days. Segmental gastrointestinal transit times and colonic motility parameters were measured with electromagnetic capsules. Gastrointestinal side effects were assessed using questionnaires. KEY RESULTS: During dosing with tapentadol, gastrointestinal side effects and motility parameters were on placebo level. Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone increased whole gut transit time by 17.9 hours (p = .015) and rectosigmoid transit time by 6.5 hours (p = .005). Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone also reduced long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .001). In comparison with placebo, oxycodone prolonged whole gut transit time by 31.6 hours, (p < .001). Moreover, less long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .002) were observed during oxycodone. For oxycodone only, slow colonic movements were associated with gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In this mechanistic study, tapentadol caused significantly less colonic dysmotility and gastrointestinal side effects as compared with oxycodone in equianalgesic doses.

Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status.

Viloxazine has a long history of clinical use in Europe as an antidepressant, and has recently been repurposed into an extended-release form for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the USA. An immediate-release formulation was approved for the treatment of depression in the UK in 1974, and was subsequently marketed there and in several European countries for 30 years with no major safety concerns. In contrast to first-generation antidepressants (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors), viloxazine was associated with a relatively low risk for cardiotoxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported side effects. The therapeutic effects of viloxazine are thought to be primarily the result of its action as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, although in vitro and preclinical in vivo animal data suggest that viloxazine may also impact the serotoninergic system. This review summarizes the evolving knowledge of viloxazine based on information from previously published preclinical and clinical investigations, and acquired unpublished historical study reports from both open-label and blinded controlled clinical trials. We review the chemical properties, mechanism of action, safety, and tolerability across these studies, and discuss the contemporary rationale for the development of this agent as an extended-release oral formulation for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Viloxazine Extended-Release (SPN-812) and Lisdexamfetamine in Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: Viloxazine extended-release is a novel nonstimulant under investigation as a potential treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given the potential for viloxazine extended-release to be co-administered with stimulant ADHD pharmacotherapies, this trial investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of combination viloxazine extended-release + lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (lisdexamfetamine) versus viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine alone. METHODS: In this single-center, cross-over, open-label trial, healthy, non-ADHD adults received single oral doses of 700 mg viloxazine extended-release alone, 50 mg lisdexamfetamine alone, and a combination of viloxazine extended-release (700 mg) + lisdexamfetamine (50 mg), with blood samples collected over 4 days postadministration. The active drug in viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine) and primary metabolite of lisdexamfetamine (d-amphetamine) were measured using chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, echocardiograms, and clinical laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: Thirty-six adults were enrolled, and 34 completed the trial. The least squares geometric mean ratios are reported as [combination / single drug (90% confidence intervals)]. Viloxazine extended-release: Cmax = 95.96% (91.33-100.82), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable time (AUC0-t) = 99.19% (96.53-101.91), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) = 99.23% (96.61-101.93). Lisdexamfetamine: Cmax = 112.78% (109.93-115.71), AUC0-t = 109.64% (105.25-114.22), and AUCinf = 109.52% (105.19-114.03). All reported adverse events, except 1 (moderate vomiting), were mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine did not impact the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine or d-amphetamine relative to administration of either drug alone. After single dose administration, the combination appeared to be safe and well tolerated.

Noradrenergic Enhancement of Motor Learning, Attention, and Working Memory in Humans.

BACKGROUND: Noradrenaline has an important role as a neuromodulator of the central nervous system. Noradrenergic enhancement was recently shown to enhance glutamate-dependent cortical facilitation and long term potentiation-like plasticity. As cortical excitability and plasticity are closely linked to various cognitive processes, here we aimed to explore whether these alterations are associated with respective cognitive performance changes. Specifically, we assessed the impact of noradrenergic enhancement on motor learning (serial reaction time task), attentional processes (Stroop interference task), and working memory performance (n-back letter task). METHODS: The study was conducted in a cross-over design. Twenty-five healthy humans performed the respective cognitive tasks after a single dose of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine or placebo administration. RESULTS: The results show that motor learning, attentional processes, and working memory performance in healthy participants were improved by reboxetine application compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study thus suggest that noradrenergic enhancement can improve memory formation and executive functions in healthy humans. The respective changes are in line with related effects of noradrenaline on cortical excitability and plasticity.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled, 4-Period Crossover Study of the Effects of Solriamfetol on QTcF Intervals in Healthy Participants.

Solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (United States and European Union; Sunosi) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (37.5-150 mg/day). A thorough QT/QTc study assessed solriamfetol effects on QT interval (Fridericia correction for heart rate; QTcF). This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-period crossover study compared single doses of 300 and 900 mg solriamfetol, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and placebo in healthy adults. Placebo- and predose-adjusted mean differences in QTcF (ddQTcF; primary end point) were analyzed, and solriamfetol pharmacokinetics were characterized. Fifty-five participants completed all periods. Upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ddQTcF for both solriamfetol doses were <10 milliseconds at all postdose time points. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin; lower bounds of 2-sided 90%CIs for ddQTcF > 5 milliseconds at 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose. There were no QTcF increases > 60 milliseconds or QTcF values > 480 milliseconds at either solriamfetol dose. Solriamfetol median tmax was 2-3 hours; exposure was dose-proportional. More participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after solriamfetol 900 versus 300 mg (70% vs 29%); none were serious (all mild/moderate), and there were no deaths. Common AEs were nausea, dizziness, and palpitations. Neither solriamfetol dose resulted in QTcF prolongation > 10 milliseconds.

Pharmacokinetics of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine: Dose Proportionality and Food Effect.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva), an approved treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia in adult patients, is a rationally designed deuterated form of tetrabenazine. Two studies assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine, and the effects of food on absorption of the deuterated active metabolites, α-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and ß-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ). One study was an open-label 2-part study in healthy volunteers; the first part included a crossover single dose of two 15 mg candidate deutetrabenazine formulations in fed and fasted states compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg in the fasted state, and the second part included single and repeated dosing of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg) compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg. The second study was an open-label 5-way crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 32) to evaluate relative bioavailability of 4 dose levels of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (6, 12, 18, and 24 mg) with a standard meal and 18 mg with a high-fat meal. Both studies confirmed longer half-lives for active metabolites and lower peak-to-trough fluctuations for the sum of the metabolites (total [α+ß]-HTBZ) following deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine (3- to 4-fold and 11-fold, respectively) in steady-state conditions. Deutetrabenazine doses estimated to provide total (α+ß)-HTBZ exposure comparable to tetrabenazine 25 mg were 11.4-13.2 mg. Food had no effect on exposure to total (α+ß)-HTBZ, as measured by AUC. Although the total (α+ß)-HTBZ Cmax of deutetrabenazine was increased by ≈50% in the presence of food, it remained lower than that of tetrabenazine.

Evaluation of the Effect of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) on QTc Interval in Healthy Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a supratherapeutic dose of SPN-812, a drug currently under investigation as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, on cardiac repolarization (QTc) in healthy adults. METHODS: The study was conducted from June 27, 2018, to July 10, 2018. It had a double-blind, randomized, crossover design in which subjects received a 3-treatment sequence-placebo, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and 1,800 mg SPN-812 for 2 consecutive days (separated by at least a 3-day washout). The primary endpoint was the correlation between the change from baseline (CFB) in individual heart rate corrected QT interval (QTcI) (ΔQTcI) and viloxazine and 5-hydroxyviloxazine glucuronide (5-OH-VLX-gluc) plasma concentrations (Cps). The secondary endpoint was the time point placebo-adjusted CFB in QTcI (ΔΔQTcI) for viloxazine. For assay sensitivity, the correlations between moxifloxacin Cp and the ΔQTcI, and moxifloxacin and time point ΔΔQTcI were evaluated. Additional evaluations included Fridericia's formula QT correction, heart rate, and the PR and QRS intervals. Changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology along with other safety parameters were also analyzed and reported. RESULTS: The correlation between ΔQTcI and viloxazine Cp demonstrated a statistically significant negative slope (P = .0012). 5-OH-VLX-gluc Cp and ΔQTcI also demonstrated a statistically significant negative slope (P = .0007). Secondary time point analyses showed no effect of SPN-812 on QTcI. Assay sensitivity with moxifloxacin was confirmed. Safety parameters were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that SPN-812 had no effect on cardiac repolarization or other ECG parameters in healthy adults, suggesting that it is not associated with a risk for cardiac arrhythmias or other electrocardiographic parameters.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose TAS-303 in Healthy Japanese Volunteers: A Single-Center, Single-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study.

Preclinical data of TAS-303 (4-piperidinyl 2,2-diphenyl-2-[propoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,3-d7 ] acetate hydrochloride), a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, show that it increases urethral contraction in rats and may therefore benefit stress urinary incontinence patients. In this single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multiple-ascending-dose phase 1 study, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of once-daily TAS-303 8, 10, 12, 15, or 18 mg administered for 16 days in healthy subjects. In addition, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and inhibitory effect of TAS-303 on hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity. Rates of adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and pharmacokinetic parameters of TAS-303 were evaluated. Fifty subjects were randomized: 7 subjects each were assigned to receive TAS-303 8-18 mg, and 3 subjects each were assigned to receive placebo at each dose. The overall incidences of adverse events and adverse drug reactions in all subjects administered TAS-303 (n = 35) was 25.7% and 2.9%, respectively, and those for the placebo groups (n = 15) were 46.7% and 0%, respectively. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. TAS-303 displayed a dose-proportional pharmacokinetic profile across doses of 8-18 mg over the 16-day multiple administration period, and TAS-303 might inhibit hepatic CYP3A activity within this dose range. TAS-303 at a dose of 8-18 mg was confirmed to be safe and tolerable.

Effect of antidepressant drugs on the brain sphingolipid system.

BACKGROUND: Major depression is a common mood disorder and the central sphingolipid system has been identified as a possible drug target of this condition. Here we investigated the action of antidepressant drugs on sphingolipid levels in rat brain regions, plasma and in cultured mouse macrophages. METHODS: Two antidepressant drugs were tested: the serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine and the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor desipramine, either following acute or chronic treatments. Content of sphingosine and ceramide were analysed using LC-MS or HPLC-UV, respectively. This was from samples of brain, plasma and cultured mouse macrophages. Antidepressant-induced effects on mRNA expression for two key genes of the sphingolipid pathway, SMPD1 and ASAH1, were also measured by using quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: Chronic but not acute administration of paroxetine or desipramine reduced sphingosine levels in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus (only paroxetine) but not in the striatum. Ceramide levels were also measured in the hippocampus following chronic paroxetine and likewise to sphingosine this treatment reduced its levels. The corresponding collected plasma samples from chronically treated animals did not show any decrease of sphingosine compared to the corresponding controls. Both drugs failed to reduce sphingosine levels from cultured mouse macrophages. The drug-induced decrease of sphingolipids coincided with reduced mRNA expression of two enzymes of the central sphingolipid pathway, i.e. acid sphingomyelinase (SMPD1) and acid ceramidase (ASAH1). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the involvement of brain sphingolipids in the mechanism of action by antidepressant drugs and for the first time highlights their differential effects on brain versus plasma levels.

The effects of medication on intraocular pressure in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A prospective study.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common psychiatric conditions in childhood. Psychopharmacological therapy is an effective treatment for ADHD. In this study, we primarily aim to investigate the effects of psychopharmacological agents on intraocular pressure (IOP) in children with ADHD. The sample included 82 children with ADHD and 36 healthy children aged between 8 and 12 years who were referred to the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Hatay State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey. Children with ADHD were divided into two groups according to the medication used: methylphenidate (MPH) group and atomoxetine (ATX) group. Before treatment and after 1- and 6-month treatment period, IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. There were no statistical differences in terms of age, gender, and IOP between the three groups (P > 0.05). After 1- and 6-month treatment, the IOP did not change significantly between baseline and 1 month or 6 months (P > 0.05). Children with ADHD may have an IOP similar to healthy children. Six-month treatment with MPH or ATX may not cause significant changes in IOP.

Pharmacokinetic and Metabolic Profile of Deutetrabenazine (TEV-50717) Compared With Tetrabenazine in Healthy Volunteers.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva Pharmaceuticals) is a deuterated form of tetrabenazine. It is the first deuterated drug to receive US regulatory approval and is approved for treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia. Two oral single dose studies comparing deutetrabenazine (25 mg) with tetrabenazine (25 mg) in healthy volunteers evaluated the impact of deuteration on pharmacokinetics of the active metabolites, alpha-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and beta-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ), metabolite profile, safety, and tolerability. In the two-way, cross-over study, the mean elimination half-life of deuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ was doubled compared with nondeuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ, with a twofold increase in overall mean exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf )) and a marginal increase in mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ). In the mass balance and metabolite profiling study, there were no novel plasma or urinary metabolites of [14 C]-deutetrabenazine relative to [14 C]-tetrabenazine. Specific deuteration in deutetrabenazine resulted in a superior pharmacokinetic profile and an increased ratio of active-to-inactive metabolites, attributes considered to provide significant benefits to patients.

Revisiting Tardive Dyskinesia: Focusing on the Basics of Identification and Treatment.

The use of second-generation antipsychotics has not eliminated tardive dyskinesia (TD), and the prevalence of the disorder is higher than commonly realized. The involuntary movements of TD can decrease patients' quality of life, cause embarrassment, and lead to social withdrawal. Clinicians must evaluate patients taking DRBAs for TD risk factors and regularly screen them for TD using a rating scale. Familiarity with tools and diagnostic criteria will enable clinicians to conduct a differential diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is made, medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration can be used to treat the condition. These medications are effective, but clinicians should be aware of key differences. A baseline assessment and regular follow-up evaluations will allow the clinician to monitor the patient's progress and make adjustments to meet treatment goals.​.