Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 13.945
Filtrar
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 168, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760713

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter angiography (TA) could help to diagnose and treat refractory nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the key medication for reducing the rebleeding rate and mortality and are usually continued after TA. It is unknown whether high-dose PPIs after TA are more effective than the standard regimen. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients who received TA because of refractory NVUGIB from 2010 to 2020 at West China Hospital. 244 patients were included and divided into two groups based on the first 3 days of PPIs treatment. All baseline characteristics were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The 30-day all-cause mortality, rebleeding rate and other outcomes were compared. The propensity score matching method was also used to verify the results. RESULTS: There were 86 patients in the high-dose group and 158 in the standard group. The average daily doses of PPI were 192.1 ± 17.9 mg and 77.8 ± 32.0 mg, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed no difference in the 30-day all-cause mortality (aHR 1.464, 95% CI 0.829 to 2.584) or rebleeding rate (aHR 1.020, 95% CI 0.693 to 1.501). There were no differences found in red blood cell transfusion, hospital stay length and further interventions, including endoscopy, repeating TA, surgery and ICU admission. The results were consistent in the subgroup analysis of patients with transcatheter arterial embolization. CONCLUSION: In refractory NVUGIB patients who received TA, regardless of whether embolization was performed, high-dose PPI treatment did not provide additional benefits compared with the standard regimen.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Recurrencia , Angiografía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , China , Puntaje de Propensión
2.
FP Essent ; 540: 7-15, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767884

RESUMEN

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects more than 20% of adults. Risk factors include older age, obesity, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction is a primary cause. Classic symptoms include heartburn and regurgitation. With classic symptoms, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can be prescribed without further testing; PPIs should be taken on an empty stomach. Patients with atypical symptoms and those not benefiting from management should undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and potentially pH and impedance testing to confirm GERD or identify other conditions. This is important because GERD increases risk of esophageal erosions/stricture, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, a large percentage of adults taking PPIs have no clear indication for treatment, and PPIs and other antisecretory therapy should be tapered off if possible. Of note, vonoprazan, a new drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has shown superiority to PPIs. In addition to pharmacotherapy, lifestyle changes are indicated, including losing weight if overweight, not lying down after meals, and ceasing tobacco use. Procedural interventions, including fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation, can be considered for patients wishing to discontinue drugs or with symptoms unresponsive to PPIs. Procedural interventions are effective for the first 1 to 3 years, but effectiveness decreases over time.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Fundoplicación/métodos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatología
3.
FP Essent ; 540: 16-23, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767885

RESUMEN

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) involves ulceration of the mucosa in the stomach and/or proximal duodenum. The main causes are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. PUD occurs in 5% to 10% of people worldwide, but rates have decreased by more than half during the past 20 years. This reduction is thought to be because of H pylori management, more conservative use of NSAIDs, and/or widespread use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Common symptoms include postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. These symptoms have broad overlap with those of other conditions, making clinical diagnosis difficult. Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, especially in older patients and those with alarm symptoms, but a test-and-treat strategy (noninvasive test for H pylori and treat if positive) can be used for younger patients with no alarm symptoms. Numerous treatment regimens are available, all of which include PPIs plus antibiotics. As an alternative to PPIs, a new triple therapy with vonoprazan (which blocks acid production) plus antibiotics has been approved and appears to be superior to conventional therapy with PPIs plus antibiotics. At least 4 weeks after treatment, repeat testing for H pylori should be obtained to confirm cure. When possible, NSAIDs should be discontinued; when not possible, antisecretory cotherapy should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles
4.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru ; 44(1): 41-51, 2024.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734911

RESUMEN

An adequate approach to refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) is essential for achieving therapeutic success. From the precise definition of rGERD to the detailed characterization of its phenotypes, it will pave the way for the customization of optimal therapy for each patient. In this narrative literature review, the aim is to provide an updated synthesis of the utility of various diagnostic tools and explore the wide range of therapeutic options, both medical and invasive, available for this condition.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico
5.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2354683, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of on-demand versus continuous prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on symptom burden and health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presenting to primary care. METHODS: Thirty-six primary care centres across Europe enrolled adult GERD patients from electronic health records. Participants were randomised to on-demand or continuous PPI prescriptions and were followed for 8 weeks. PPI intake, symptom burden, and quality of life were compared between the two groups using mixed-effect regression analyses. Spearman's correlation was used to assess the association between changes in PPI dose and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients (median age 51 years, 58% women) completed the initial visit, with 360 attending the follow-up visit. There was no significant difference in PPI use between the continuous and on-demand prescription groups (b=.57, 95%CI:0.40-1.53), although PPI use increased in both groups (b = 1.33, 95%CI:0.65 - 2.01). Advice on prescribing strategy did not significantly affect patient-reported outcomes. Both symptom burden (Reflux Disease Questionnaire, b=-0.61, 95%CI:-0.73 - -0.49) and quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey physical score b = 3.31, 95%CI:2.17 - 4.45) improved from baseline to follow-up in both groups. Increased PPI intake correlated with reduced reflux symptoms (n = 347, ρ=-0.12, p = 0.02) and improved quality of life (n = 217, ρ = 0.16, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In real-world settings, both continuous and on-demand PPI prescriptions resulted in similar increases in PPI consumption with no difference in treatment effects. Achieving an adequate PPI dose to alleviate reflux symptom burden improves quality of life in GERD patients. EudraCT number 2014-001314-25.


Continuous and on-demand prescription increase in proton pump inhibitor consumption equally in real-world settings and did not result in different outcomes.Reaching a sufficient dose of proton pump inhibitor to reduce reflux symptom burden improves quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Atención Primaria de Salud , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Anciano , Europa (Continente) , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Sintomática
6.
Helicobacter ; 29(1): e13048, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716864

RESUMEN

Current global variations exist in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens. Triple therapy (TT), bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT), and high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) currently represent the predominant regimens. These regimens diverge in terms of treatment duration, the utilization of susceptibility testing, acid-inhibiting drug administration, and patient education. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review on these H. pylori treatment regimens. Our review aims to provide standardized treatment recommendations for H. pylori, reducing the risk of amalgamating findings from diverse eradication regimens. Recent research suggests that the optimal treatment duration for TT and BQT may be 14 and 10 days, respectively. Selecting the appropriate treatment duration for HDDT should rely on regional research evidence, and 14 days may be the optimal duration. The incorporation of susceptibility testing in TT is of paramount importance. In the case of BQT, the absence of susceptibility testing may be considered as an option, contingent upon cost and availability, and should be determined based on local antibiotic resistance patterns and the efficacy of empirical regimens. The type and dosage of acid-inhibiting drug would affect the efficacy of these regimens. Acid-inhibiting drugs should be selected and applied reasonably according to the population and therapies. Adequate patient education plays a pivotal role in the eradication of H. pylori. In regions with accessible local research evidence, the 10-day empirical BQT regimen may be considered a preferred choice for H. pylori eradication.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791497

RESUMEN

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the long-term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other upper gastrointestinal disorders, such as the healing of peptic ulcers and/or prophylactic treatment of peptic ulcers. PPIs are also widely used as symptomatic treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia. One of the adverse effects of the long-term use of PPI is rebound acid hypersecretion (RAHS), which can occur after the withdrawal of PPI therapy due to a compensatory increase in gastric acid production. Mechanisms of the RAHS have been well established. Studies have shown that pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion after the discontinuation of PPIs increased significantly compared to that before treatment. In healthy volunteers treated with PPIs, the latter induced gastrointestinal symptoms in 40-50% of subjects after the discontinuation of PPI therapy but after stopping the placebo. It is important for practicing physicians to be aware and understand the underlying mechanisms and inform patients about potential RAHS before discontinuing PPIs in order to avoid continuing unnecessary PPI therapy. This is important because RAHS may lead patients to reuptake PPIs as symptoms are incorrectly thought to originate from the recurrence of underlying conditions, such as GERD. Mechanisms of RAHS have been well established; however, clinical implications and the risk factors for RAHS are not fully understood. Further research is needed to facilitate appropriate management of RAHS in the future.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Gástrico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/metabolismo , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Animales
8.
Helicobacter ; 29(3): e13094, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA), vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC), vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBQT), and PPI-based triple (PAC) or quadruple therapy (PBQT) for H. pylori infection with the consideration of duration of therapy and amoxicillin dose (H: high; L: low). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 15, 2023. The efficacy outcome was eradication rate, and safety outcomes included the rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.8% for VA, 89.1% for VAC, and 91.8% for VBQT, which increased with the higher amoxicillin frequency of administration and extended duration of therapy within each regimen. There were no significant differences in eradication rate when comparing 7-VA versus 7-VAC and 14-VA versus 14-VAC. VA was at least comparable to PAC. The eradication rate did not differ significantly between 10-H-VA or 14-H-VA versus 14-PBQT. 7-L-VAC demonstrated higher eradication rate versus 7-PAC and comparable rate to 14-PAC. 14-VBQT showed higher eradication rates versus 14-PBQT. The adverse events rate was 19.3% for VA, 30.6% for VAC, and 38.4% for VBQT. VA had similar risk of adverse events versus VAC and significantly fewer adverse events compared to PBQT. The treatment discontinuation rate did not differ significantly between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of VBQT was the highest at above 90% followed by VAC and VA. VA was as effective as VAC and superior to PPI-based therapies with favorable safety, highlighting the potential of VA therapy as a promising alternative to traditional PPI-based therapies. VPZ-based triple or quadruple therapies was more effective than PPI-based therapies. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen especially in the western countries.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/efectos adversos
9.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(2)2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729753

RESUMEN

Stress ulcer prophylaxis is started in the critical care unit to decrease the risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcers in critically ill persons and to decrease mortality caused by stress ulcer complications. Unfortunately, the drugs are often continued after recovery through discharge, paving the way for unnecessary polypharmacy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including patients admitted to the adult critical care unit and started on the stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or histamine receptor 2 blocker (H2 blocker) with an aim to determine the prevalence of inappropriate continuation at discharge and associated factors. RESULT: 3200 people were initiated on stress ulcer prophylaxis, and the medication was continued in 1666 patients upon discharge. Indication for long-term use was not found in 744 of 1666, with a 44% prevalence of inappropriate continuation. A statistically significant association was found with the following risk factors: discharge disposition (home vs other medical facilities, p=0.002), overall length of stay (more than 10 days vs less than or equal to 10 days, p<0.0001), mechanical ventilator use (p<0.001), number of days on a mechanical ventilator (more than 2 days vs less than or equal to 2 days, p<0.001) and class of stress ulcer prophylaxis drug used (H2 blocker vs PPI, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of inappropriate continuation was found to be higher than prior studies. Given the risk of unnecessary medication intake and the associated healthcare cost, a web-based quality improvement initiative is being considered.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina , Alta del Paciente , Úlcera Péptica , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/normas , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control
10.
Cancer Med ; 13(10): e7083, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may indirectly diminish the microbiome diversity, thereby reducing the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conversely, recent publications have shown that PPIs could potentially enhance the response to ICIs. The precise mechanism through which PPIs modulate the ICIs remains unclear. In this study, we discovered a novel molecular function of PPIs in regulating immune invasion, specifically through inducing PD-L1 translocation in various tumor cells. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice subcutaneous transplantation model is used to verify the potential efficacy of PPIs and PD-L1 antibody. Western blotting analysis and phosphorylated chip are used to verify the alteration of PD-L1-related pathways after being treated with PPIs. The related gene expression is performed by qRT-PCR and luciferase reporter analysis. We also collected 60 clinical patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer or reflux esophagitis and then detected the expression of PD-L1 in the tissue samples by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: We observed that the IC50 of tumor cells in response to PPIs was significantly higher than that of normal epithelial cells. PPIs significantly increased the expression of PD-L1 on cell membrane at clinically relevant concentrations. Furthermore, pre-treatment with PPIs appeared to synergize the efficiency of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in mouse models. However, PPI administration did not alter the transcription or total protein level of PD-L1 in multiple tumor cells. Using a phosphorylated protein chip, we identified that PPIs enhanced the phosphorylation of GSK3ß, then leading to PD-L1 protein translocation to the cell membranes. The capacity of PPIs to upregulate PD-L1 was negated following GSK3ß knockout. Furthermore, our clinical data showed that the PPIs use resulted in increased PD-L1 expression in esophageal cancer patients. CONCLUSION: We mainly address a significant and novel mechanism that the usage of PPIs could directly induce the expression of PD-L1 by inducing GSK3ß phosphorylation and facilitate primary tumor progression and metastasis.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1 , Membrana Celular , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3 beta , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Animales , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3 beta/metabolismo , Fosforilación , Humanos , Ratones , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Femenino , Masculino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos
11.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11956, 2024 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796481

RESUMEN

The Montreal consensus recognizes chronic cough as an extra-esophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effects of acid-suppressive medications in adults with non-specific chronic cough. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368769). Placebo-controlled randomized trials evaluating the impact of acid-suppressive medications on persistent cough were included. The systematic search was performed on the 1st of November 2022 in three databases. A random-effects model was used for the calculations. The effect size was the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total number of 11 double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis. Data showed that compared to placebo, PPIs decreased the severity of cough (SMD 0.33; CI 0.05; 0.61). Therapeutic response was not different in patients with non-specific chronic cough only, compared to those with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Prolonged treatment durations did not result in greater symptomatic improvement, with SMD 0.33 (CI - 0.22; 0.88), 0.31 (CI - 1.74; 2.35), 0.32 (CI - 0.29; 0.93) and 0.34 (CI - 0.16; 0.85), following 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. The pooled analysis of the improvement in quality of life with PPIs found an SMD of 0.39 (CI - 0.51; 1.29). PPIs mildly decrease the severity of non-specific chronic cough, irrespective of treatment duration.


Asunto(s)
Tos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tos Crónica
12.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 47(5): 1028-1032, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797695

RESUMEN

Omeprazole, a gastric acid pump inhibitor, is repeatedly administered and is oxidatively metabolized mainly by polymorphic cytochrome P450 2C19. The prescribed dosage of omeprazole was discontinued or reduced in 47 of the 135 patients who received omeprazole alone in this survey, as recorded in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. The days to onset of omeprazole-related disorders were 3-4 d (median) and 16 d for intravenous 20-40 mg and oral 20 mg daily doses, respectively, in 34 patients for whom relevant data were available. The maximum plasma concentration of omeprazole was pharmacokinetically modeled after a single oral 40-mg dose in P450 2C19-defective poor metabolizers and was 2.4-fold higher than that in extensive metabolizers. The modeled area under the hepatic concentration curves of omeprazole in P450 2C19 poor metabolizers after virtual daily 40-mg doses for 7 d was 5.2-fold higher than that in the extensive metabolizers. Omeprazole-induced P450 2C19 (approx. 2-fold), resulting in increased hepatic intrinsic clearance in repeated doses, was considered after the second day. Virtual plasma/hepatic exposure estimated using pharmacokinetic modeling in subjects with P450 2C19 poor metabolizers indicated that these exposure levels virtually estimated could be one of causal factors for unexpected hepatic disorders induced by prescribed omeprazole, such as those resulting from drug interactions with repeatedly co-administered medicines.


Asunto(s)
Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Hígado , Omeprazol , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Omeprazol/farmacocinética , Omeprazol/efectos adversos , Omeprazol/sangre , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/metabolismo , Masculino , Femenino , Japón , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/sangre , Hígado/metabolismo , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Modelos Biológicos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/sangre , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Pueblos del Este de Asia
13.
N Z Med J ; 137(1595): 64-72, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754114

RESUMEN

AIM: The recommended duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for patients without atrial fibrillation varies from 1 month to 1 year depending on the balance of risks of ischaemia and major bleeding. Patients on DAPT with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding are also recommended to receive a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Our aim was to audit current practice against the 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline recommendations. METHODS: One hundred consecutive ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention discharged from Middlemore Hospital and without atrial fibrillation in the first quarter of 2023 were studied. ANZACS-QI ischaemic (I) and bleeding (B) risk scores were calculated, with patients categorised in four groups based on ESC recommendations-low I/low B risk, low I/high B, high I/low B and high I/high B. Guideline and clinician recommended duration of DAPT and prescription of PPI were compared. RESULTS: All patients were planned for DAPT at discharge and 91% a PPI. Up to four out of five ACS patients could have been planned for shorter DAPT durations based on the ESC guideline recommendations. Over half of included patients (53%) had a high bleeding risk, yet 85% of these patients received 12 months of DAPT despite ESC recommendations of 1-3 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was a divergence between clinical practice and the recommendations of the 2020 ESC guidelines. We discuss these results in relation to the updated August 2023 ESC guidelines, which have reaffirmed a 12-month duration of DAPT as the default position.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Adhesión a Directriz , Nueva Zelanda , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente
14.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(18): 2467-2478, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) may affect the upper digestive tract; up to 20% of population in Western nations are affected by GERD. Antacids, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are considered the referring medications for GERD. Nevertheless, PPIs must be managed carefully because their use, especially chronic, could be linked with some adverse effects. An effective and safe alternative pharmacological tool for GERD is needed. After the identification of potentially new medications to flank PPIs, it is mandatory to revise and improve good clinical practices even through a consensus process. AIM: To optimize diagnosis and treatment guidelines for GERD through a consensus based on Delphi method. METHODS: The availability of clinical studies describing the action of the multicomponent/multitarget medication Nux vomica-Heel, subject of the consensus, is the basic prerequisite for the consensus itself. A modified Delphi process was used to reach a consensus among a panel of Italian GERD specialists on the overlapping approach PPIs/Nux vomica-Heel as a new intervention model for the management of GERD. The Voting Consensus group was composed of 49 Italian Medical Doctors with different specializations: Gastroenterology, otolaryngology, geriatrics, and general medicine. A scientific committee analyzed the literature, determined areas that required investigation (in agreement with the multiple-choice questionnaire results), and identified two topics of interest: (1) GERD disease; and (2) GERD treatment. Statements for each of these topics were then formulated and validated. The Delphi process involved two rounds of questioning submitted to the panel experts using an online platform. RESULTS: According to their routinary GERD practice and current clinical evidence, the panel members provided feedback to each questionnaire statement. The experts evaluated 15 statements and reached consensus on all 15. The statements regarding the GERD disease showed high levels of agreement, with consensus ranging from 70% to 92%. The statements regarding the GERD treatment also showed very high levels of agreement, with consensus ranging from 90% to 100%. This Delphi process was able to reach consensus among physicians in relevant aspects of GERD management, such as the adoption of a new approach to treat patients with GERD based on the overlapping between PPIs and Nux vomica-Heel. The consensus was unanimous among the physicians with different specializations, underlying the uniqueness of the agreement reached to identify in the overlapping approach between PPIs and Nux vomica-Heel a new intervention model for GERD management. The results support that an effective approach to deprescribe PPIs through a progressive decalage timetable (reducing PPIs administration to as-needed use), should be considered. CONCLUSION: Nux vomica-Heel appears to be a valid opportunity for GERD treatment to favor the deprescription of PPIs and to maintain low disease activity together with the symptomatology remission.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Italia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiácidos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos
15.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(6): e5816, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antisecretory drugs are commonly prescribed with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, omeprazole and esomeprazole (inhibiting proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) may increase cardiovascular event rates on co-administration with clopidogrel. This study aimed to examine trends in the use of antisecretory agents in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT and the concomitant use of clopidogrel and inhibiting PPIs. METHODS: We used National Inpatient Sample data compiled by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service from 2009 to 2020. Further, we identified patients who were prescribed clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI and investigated the concomitant use of antisecretory agents with clopidogrel. To verify the annual trend of drug utilization, we used the Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2020, the percentage of H2 receptor antagonist users decreased steadily (from 82.5% in 2009 to 25.3% in 2020); instead, the percentage of PPI users increased (from 23.7% in 2009 to 82.0% in 2020). The use of inhibiting PPI also increased (from 4.2% in 2009 to 30.7% in 2020). Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) were rarely used before 2019; however, in 2020, it accounted for 7.8% of the antisecretory users. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the use of inhibiting PPIs increased steadily in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT therapy. This is a major concern since the concomitant use of inhibiting PPIs with clopidogrel could increase the risk of cardiovascular events.


Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/uso terapéutico , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Omeprazol/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/uso terapéutico
16.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 177, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) are useful in peptic ulcer prevention, their efficacy in preventing other gastrointestinal bleeding remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the status of gastrointestinal bleeding in the modern era when PPIs are widely used. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2018 and 2019 at two high-volume centers. Patients were categorized based on whether they experienced gastrointestinal bleeding within 2 years of PCI into groups A (patients who experienced gastrointestinal bleeding within 2 years after PCI) and B (patients who did not experience gastrointestinal bleeding). RESULTS: Groups A and B included 21 (4.1%) and 494 (95.9%) patients, respectively (a total of 515 patients). Age at the initial PCI (77.8±2.4 and 72.0±0.5 years in groups A and B, respectively; p = 0.02), weight (53.8±3.2 and 61.8±0.7 kg in groups A and B, respectively; p = 0.01), and concomitant warfarin use (14.3% and 2.0% in groups A and B, respectively; p = 0.0005) were significantly different between the groups. The high bleeding risk rate (90.5% and 47.6% in groups A and B, respectively; p = 0.0001) was significantly different between the groups. A total of 95.9% of patients were taking PPIs or PCAB without significant differences between the groups. However, only one patient, who was taking steroids, had a gastric ulcer during PCAB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acid-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding is largely controlled by PPIs in post-PCI patients. Furthermore, the risk factors for non-acid-related bleeding include older age, lower weight, and concomitant warfarin use.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Isquemia Miocárdica , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Anciano , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Sr Care Pharm ; 39(6): 218-227, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803024

RESUMEN

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colorado/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Prevención Primaria , Centros Médicos Académicos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico
18.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 157, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At present, eradication regimens for non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) have not been established yet. We investigated effectiveness of the standard triple-drug combination therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy in eradication of NHPH. METHODS: Subjects were the patients who were diagnosed with NHPH-infected gastritis based on microscopic findings, helical-shaped organisms obviously larger than Helicobacter pylori, in the gastric mucosal specimens using Giemsa staining at Kenwakai Hospital between November 2010 and September 2021, whose NHPH species were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of urease genes in endoscopically-biopsied samples, and who consented to NHPH eradication with either the triple-drug combination therapy for one week or a PPI monotherapy for six months. Six months after the completion of eradication, its result was determined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, microscopic examination, and PCR analysis. In cases of unsuccessful eradication, a second eradication with the other therapy was suggested to the patient. RESULTS: PCR analysis detected NHPH in 38 patients: 36 as Helicobacter suis and two as Helicobacter heilmannii/Helicobacter ailurogastricus. Fourteen Helicobacter suis-infected and one Helicobacter heilmannii/Helicobacter ailurogastricus-infected patients requested eradication therapy. The triple-drug combination therapy succeeded in four of five patients, while the PPI monotherapy succeeded in five of 10 patients. Three of five patients who had been unsuccessful with the latter therapy requested the triple-drug combination therapy as the second eradication and all three were successful. In total, the triple-drug combination therapy succeeded in seven out of eight (87.5%) attempted cases, while the PPI monotherapy in five out of 10 (50%) attempted cases. CONCLUSIONS: In NHPH eradication, the triple-drug combination therapy was considered to be effective to some extent and to become the first-line therapy. While, although less successful, PPI monotherapy appeared to be a potentially promising option particularly for patients with allergy or resistance to antibiotics. Effectiveness of PPI monotherapy may be attributed to hyperacid environment preference of Helicobacter suis and PPI's acid-suppressive effect. Additionally, male predominance in NHPH-infected gastritis patients may be explained by gender difference in gastric acid secretory capacity. However, further evidence needs to be accumulated. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kenwakai Hospital (No. 2,017,024).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Gastritis , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter heilmannii , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gastritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastritis/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Helicobacter heilmannii/aislamiento & purificación , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Helicobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Helicobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiología , Mucosa Gástrica/patología
19.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(16): 2220-2232, 2024 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690017

RESUMEN

Several features of drug-induced mucosal alterations have been observed in the upper gastrointestinal tract, i.e., the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. These include pill-induced esophagitis, desquamative esophagitis, worsening of gastroesophageal reflux, chemotherapy-induced esophagitis, proton pump inhibitor-induced gastric mucosal changes, medication-induced gastric erosions and ulcers, pseudomelanosis of the stomach, olmesartan-related gastric mucosal inflammation, lanthanum deposition in the stomach, zinc acetate hydrate tablet-induced gastric ulcer, immune-related adverse event gastritis, olmesartan-asso-ciated sprue-like enteropathy, pseudomelanosis of the duodenum, and lanthanum deposition in the duodenum. For endoscopists, acquiring accurate knowledge regarding these diverse drug-induced mucosal alterations is crucial not only for the correct diagnosis of these lesions but also for differential diag-nosis of other conditions. This minireview aims to provide essential information on drug-induced mucosal alterations observed on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, along with representative endoscopic images.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Humanos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Mucosa Gástrica/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Mucosa Esofágica/patología , Mucosa Esofágica/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(16): 2209-2219, 2024 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690022

RESUMEN

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is an inflammatory condition in the laryngopharynx and upper aerodigestive tract mucosa caused by reflux of stomach contents beyond the esophagus. LPRD commonly presents with sym-ptoms such as hoarseness, cough, sore throat, a feeling of throat obstruction, excessive throat mucus. This complex condition is thought to involve both reflux and reflex mechanisms, but a clear understanding of its molecular mechanisms is still lacking. Currently, there is no standardized diagnosis or treatment protocol. Therapeutic strategies for LPRD mainly include lifestyle modifications, proton pump inhibitors and endoscopic surgery. This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature regarding the mechanisms, patho-physiology and treatment of LPRD. We also provide an in-depth exploration of the association between LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/fisiopatología , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/terapia , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estilo de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA