Unexpected evolution of a monster case of insulin-induced skin lipohypertrophy.

In this journal, in 2020, we published the case of a 74-year-old female outpatient with type-2 diabetes mellitus who self-injected insulin four times a day according to the basal-bolus regimen, with an high glycemic variability and an high rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes. Three years before, we had found two extraordinarily large skin lipohypertrophies, with large underlying fluid collections with high insulin concentration. A long educational and intensive training completely repaired the skin lesions with the disappearance of the subcutaneous insulin reservoirs. Glycemic variability has been reduced dramatically, severe hypoglycemia has almost completely disappeared and the daily dose of insulin has been reduced by 38%. However, this extraordinary, albeit unexpected, result was achieved in five years.

In Vitro Biological Characterization of Recombinant Insulin Aspart from Biogenomics and Originator Insulin Aspart.

BACKGROUND: Bioassays are used to identify the pharmacological activity of new or chemically unknown compounds, as well as their undesirable effect, including toxicity. Biological assays are also required to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of recombinant biologics to confirm its biosimilarity to its originator. In the present study, analytical similarity between the biosimilar and its innovator is established by in vitro bioassays. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to show the comparative in vitro characterization of the recombinant insulin aspart from BioGenomics with its originator insulin aspart, using relevant biological assays. METHODS: In vitro assays such as receptor binding, receptor autophosphorylation, glucose uptake, and mitogenic potential were analyzed for biological characterization of BioGenomics recombinant insulin aspart (BGL-ASP) manufactured by BioGenomics Limited and NovoRapid® as the reference medicinal product (RMP) manufactured by Novo Nordisk. Insulin receptor binding was studied by a state-of-the-art method, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for biomolecular interactions. The receptor autophosphorylation assay measures the phosphorylated insulin receptor in cell lysates. The glucose uptake assay measures the uptake of glucose by 3T3-L1 cells in the presence of insulin. Lipogenesis was studied in treated 3T3-L1 cells by detecting the accumulation of lipid droplets in the cells. Mitogenic effect was studied by cell proliferation assay using MCF-7 cells. A rabbit bioidentity test was performed by measuring the sudden decrease in blood glucose in the presence of insulin. RESULTS: The binding studies showed that the affinity of BGL-ASP was highly comparable to NovoRapid®. Insulin receptor autophosphorylation, glucose uptake, and lipogenesis demonstrated high similarity to the RMP. The mitogenic assay for BGL-ASP did not show any proliferative effect and was comparable to the RMP. The in vivo bioidentity test showed that the BGL-ASP is highly similar to the innovator, NovoRapid®. CONCLUSION: The biological characterization studies of BGL-ASP demonstrated high binding and functional similarity to NovoRapid®.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Novel U500 Insulin Aspart Formulation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study in People With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a novel U500 insulin aspart formulation (AT278 U500) compared with insulin aspart (IAsp U100). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-center, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 38 men with type 1 diabetes (body weight ≤100 kg and total insulin dose <1.2 units/kg/day). Participants received a single dose of either AT278 U500 or IAsp U100 (0.3 units/kg s.c.) in a crossover design, followed by an 8-h euglycemic clamp in the absence of basal insulin. RESULTS: With AT278 U500, onset of appearance in serum was 6 min earlier (P < 0.0001) and reached 50% of maximum concentration 23 min faster (P < 0.0001). Insulin exposure with AT278 U500 was 4.0-fold higher within the first 30 min (95% CI 3.29, 4.90), 1.5-fold higher within the first 60 min (95% CI 1.35, 1.76), and statistically superior up to 90 min postdose (P < 0.05). With AT278 U500, onset of action was 10 min earlier (P < 0.0001) and reached 50% of maximum glucose infusion rate 20 min faster (P < 0.0001). The glucose-lowering effect with AT278 U500 was 8.9-fold higher within the first 30 min (95% CI 5.96, 17.46), 2.4-fold higher within the first 60 min (95% CI 1.92, 3.22), and statistically superior up to 2 h postdose (P < 0.0001). Overall insulin exposure and glucose-lowering effect were comparable. No significant safety findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: AT278 U500 offers rapid-acting characteristics in a reduced dose volume, with accelerated absorption and onset of action compared with IAsp U100 in the studied population.

Oscillations of C-peptide in the euglycemic clamp and their effect on the pharmacodynamic assessment of insulin preparations.

C-peptide should be continuously suppressed. However, increased postdosing C-peptide is not an uncommon phenomenon in euglycemic clamp studies involving healthy participants. This study aimed to determine the extent to which the postdosing C-peptide increases from the baseline that could affect the accuracy of glucodynamics in euglycemic clamp studies involving healthy subjects. First, 10 healthy males underwent a 10-h euglycemic clamp without exogenous insulin administration to obtain a reference interval (RI) for the ratio of C-peptide after 0 min (CPt ) to baseline C-peptide (CP0 ). Then, the data from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of insulin aspart (IAsp) were analyzed, and 70 eligible clamps were grouped by CPt /CP0 : group A ([CPt /CP0 ]max   > upper limit of RI), group B (1<[CPt /CP0 ]max  ≤ upper limit of RI), and group C ([CPt /CP0 ]max  ≤ 1). The differences in basal and clamped blood glucose, CPt /CP0 , and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IAsp were compared, and the relationship between elevated CPt and the accuracy of pharmacodynamics was analyzed. The RI of CPt /CP0 was 22.7%-152.1%; 1.5 × baseline might be a ceiling for the increase in CPt under stable conditions. The maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR) in group A tended to be higher than that in group B or C (Pfor trend  = 0.033). The AUCGIR,0-10h in groups A, B, and C was 1983 ± 650,1682 ± 454, and 1479 ± 440 mg/kg (P = 0.047), respectively, under comparable IAsp exposure. No intergroup difference was detected in clamped glucose, IAsp dose, or body mass index. In conclusion, postdosing C-peptide over 1.5× baseline indicates insufficient inhibition of endogenous insulin secretion, which could compromise the pharmacodynamics of insulin preparations.

[The Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Bioequivalence of Insulin Aspart Produced by the United Laboratories Evaluated by Euglycemic Clamp Study].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a rapid-acting insulin analog-insulin aspart (the tested formulation) which was manufactured by The United Laboratories and to evaluate the bioequiavailability to the reference formulation (NovoRapid ®) produced by Novo Nordisk in Chinese healthy volunteers. METHODS: A total of 24 male healthy volunteers were recruited from February to April 2016 to participant in this before-after, single dose, and randomized crossover study. And the experimental observation was conducted on 2 test days respectively with a between-period from 7 to10 d. According to a random number table, the volunteers were divided into group A or B, group A was administrated with tested insulin aspart (IAsp) for the first time and reference NovoRapid ® for the second time and group B had the revered order differed from group A. The PK/PD of these insulin analogs were estimated by euglycemic clamp study. RESULTS: The relative biological effectiveness (reflecting gloucose-lowing effect) and bioavailability on behalf of plasma-drug concentration were 98.3±18.8% and 97.3%±8.3% respectively. For PK parameters, the 90% confidence interval ( CI) of peak plasma insulin concentration ( C max) and area under the curve of insulin aspart concentration from 0 to 10 hours ( AUC IAsp, 0-10 h) of IAsp were 88.8%-106% (equivalent range 70%-143%) and 94.0%-100% (equivalent range 80%-125%) respectively; for PD parameters, the 90% CI of the maximum glucose infusion rate ( GIR max) and AUC GIR, 0-10 h were 95.5%-113% (equivalent range 70%-143%) and 89.9%-104% (equivalent range 80%-125%) respectively, which indicated that IAsp and NovoRapid® was bioequivalent. One of the subjects discovered hyperuricemia without clinical symptoms and the rest had no clinically significant abnormalities in the safety indexes before and after the tests. No hypoglycemic events, allergic reactions, or local injection adverse reaction occurred in this trial. CONCLUSION: The tested IAsp has comparable relative bioavailability to the reference NovoRapid ®.

Long-Term Intranasal Insulin Aspart: A Profile of Gene Expression, Memory, and Insulin Receptors in Aged F344 Rats.

Intranasal insulin is a safe and effective method for ameliorating memory deficits associated with pathological brain aging. However, the impact of different formulations and the duration of treatment on insulin's efficacy and the cellular processes targeted by the treatment remain unclear. Here, we tested whether intranasal insulin aspart, a short-acting insulin formulation, could alleviate memory decline associated with aging and whether long-term treatment affected regulation of insulin receptors and other potential targets. Outcome variables included measures of spatial learning and memory, autoradiography and immunohistochemistry of the insulin receptor, and hippocampal microarray analyses. Aged Fischer 344 rats receiving long-term (3 months) intranasal insulin did not show significant memory enhancement on the Morris water maze task. Autoradiography results showed that long-term treatment reduced insulin binding in the thalamus but not the hippocampus. Results from hippocampal immunofluorescence revealed age-related decreases in insulin immunoreactivity that were partially offset by intranasal administration. Microarray analyses highlighted numerous insulin-sensitive genes, suggesting insulin aspart was able to enter the brain and alter hippocampal RNA expression patterns including those associated with tumor suppression. Our work provides insights into potential mechanisms of intranasal insulin and insulin resistance, and highlights the importance of treatment duration and the brain regions targeted.

Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences.

Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) with two added excipients, L-arginine and niacinamide, to ensure formulation stability with accelerated initial absorption after subcutaneous administration compared with previously developed rapid-acting insulins. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of faster aspart have been characterised in clinical pharmacology trials with comparable overall methodology. In subjects with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes, the serum IAsp concentration-time and glucose-lowering effect profiles are left-shifted for faster aspart compared with IAsp. In addition, faster aspart provides earlier onset, doubling of initial exposure, and an up to 2.5-fold increase in initial glucose-lowering effect within 30 min of subcutaneous injection, as well as earlier offset of exposure and effect. Similar results have been shown using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The improved pharmacological properties of faster aspart versus IAsp are consistent across populations, i.e. in the elderly, children, adolescents and the Japanese. Thus, the faster aspart pharmacological characteristics more closely resemble the mealtime insulin secretion in healthy individuals, giving faster aspart the potential to further improve postprandial glucose control in subjects with diabetes. Indeed, change from baseline in 1-h postprandial glucose increment is in favour of faster aspart versus IAsp when used as basal-bolus or CSII treatment in phase III trials in subjects with T1D or T2D. This review summarises the currently published results from clinical pharmacology trials with faster aspart and discusses the potential clinical benefits of faster aspart compared with previous rapid-acting insulin products.

Fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose-lowering effect compared with insulin aspart.

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) versus insulin aspart (IAsp) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 61 people with T2D usually treated with insulin ± oral antidiabetic drug(s) received single-dose faster aspart and IAsp (0.3 U/kg) on separate visits. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected frequently until 12 hours post-dose. Glucose-lowering effect was determined in a euglycaemic clamp lasting up to 12 hours post-dose (target 5.0 mmol/L). RESULTS: The serum IAsp pharmacokinetic profile and glucose-lowering effect profile were shifted to the left for faster aspart versus IAsp. Least squares mean (± SE) onset of appearance was 3.3 ± 0.3 minutes for faster aspart, which was 1.2 minutes earlier than for IAsp (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.8;-0.5; P = .001). Onset of action for faster aspart was 8.9 minutes earlier (95% CI -12.1;-5.7; P < .001) than for IAsp. During the first 30 minutes after dosing, 89% larger IAsp exposure (ratio faster aspart/IAsp 1.89 [95% CI 1.56;2.28]; P < .001) and 147% greater glucose-lowering effect (2.47 [95% CI 1.58;6.22]; P < .001) were observed for faster aspart compared with IAsp. Offset of exposure (time to 50% of maximum IAsp concentration in the late part of the pharmacokinetic profile) occurred earlier for faster aspart (difference faster aspart - IAsp -36.4 minutes [95% CI -55.3;-17.6]; P < .001). The treatment difference of faster aspart - IAsp in offset of glucose-lowering effect (time to 50% of maximum glucose infusion rate in the late part of the glucose infusion rate profile) was -14.4 minutes (95% CI -34.4;5.5; P = .152). CONCLUSIONS: In people with T2D, faster aspart was associated with earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose-lowering effect compared with IAsp, as previously shown in people with type 1 diabetes.

Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To confirm non-inferiority of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once-daily (OD) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) U100 OD + insulin aspart (IAsp) OD for HbA1c after 26 weeks, and compare efficacy and safety between groups at W26 + W38. METHODS: A 38-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target (HbA1c < 7.0%) trial in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (on basal insulin ±â€¯oral antidiabetic drugs; HbA1c 7.0-10.0%). Randomisation (1:1): IDegAsp or IGlar U100 + IAsp. Intensification to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) was permitted at W26 + W32, or with additional IAsp injections at W26 (maximum IAsp BID) or W32 (maximum IAsp three-times daily). RESULTS: For W0-W26, mean percentage-change (standard deviation) HbA1c was: IDegAsp, -1.1 (0.9); IGlar U100 + IAsp, -1.1 (0.8); estimated treatment difference: 0.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.06; 0.21) confirmed non-inferiority. At W26 and W38, target HbA1c achievement, and mean fasting and postprandial glucose were similar across groups. At W38, more subjects achieved target HbA1c without hypoglycaemia with IDegAsp (22.5%) than with IGlar U100 + IAsp (21.1%), with significantly fewer nocturnal episodes (W0-W38, estimated rate ratio: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.40; 0.93]). Safety profiles were similar across treatment groups throughout. CONCLUSIONS: IDegAsp OD/BID are effective treatment intensification options versus multiple injection basal-bolus therapies, achieving similar glycaemic control, with significantly less nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Faster Insulin Aspart: A New Bolus Option for Diabetes Mellitus.

Since the approval of bolus insulin, it has been used frequently in clinical practice for the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus for postprandial control. Another new product is faster insulin aspart (Fiasp, Novo Nordisk), a fast-acting insulin with 100 units/mL. Several studies have been conducted evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster insulin aspart, compared with insulin aspart. This new bolus insulin provides greater glucose-lowering effect at 20 min, following subcutaneous administration. Faster insulin aspart had a greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c concentrations from baseline in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus when compared with insulin aspart, whereas the two bolus insulins were similar in this outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Depending on the trial, the safety profile may differ between these two insulins with severe or confirmed hypoglycemia. Based on the clinical evidence for efficacy and safety, faster insulin aspart can be considered a viable option for those patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus who desire to inject immediately prior to a meal or within 20 min following a meal. However, additional studies should be completed to determine the role of faster insulin aspart in pregnant and pediatric patients, along with patients prescribed insulin pumps. This article evaluates and summarizes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster insulin aspart for patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, and summarizes its application to clinical practice.

Physico-chemical properties of co-formulated fast-acting insulin with pramlintide.

Since the discovery of amylin its use has been discouraged by the inadequacy of the protocol involving multiple injections in addition to insulin. We aimed here to develop a combined fixed-dose formulation of pramlintide with fast-acting insulin. We have investigated the compatibility of regular and fast-acting insulin analogues (Aspart, AspB28, and LisPro, LysB28ProB29) with the amylin analogue pramlintide by using electrospray ionization - ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (ESI-IMS-MS), kinetic aggregation assays monitored by thioflavin T, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in the evaluation of the aggregation product. Insulin interacts with pramlintide, forming heterodimers as probed by ESI-IMS-MS. While their interaction is likely to delay the amyloid aggregation of pramlintide in phosphate-buffered solution pH 7.0, they do not prevent aggregation at this condition. At acidic sodium acetate solution pH 5.0, combination of pramlintide and the fast-acting insulin analogues become stable against amyloid aggregation. The co-formulated product at high concentration of both pramlintide (600 µg/mL,150 µM) and LisPro insulin (50 IU/mL, 300 µM) showed also stability against amyloid aggregation. These data indicate the physico-chemical short-term stability of the co-formulated preparation of LisPro insulin with pramlintide, which could bring benefits for the combined therapy.

[Faster aspart insulin (FIASP®)]. / Le médicament du mois. L'insuline «faster aspart¼ (Fiasp®).

Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart), commercialized under the trade name of Fiasp®, is insulin aspart in a new formulation aiming to mimic the physiologic prandial insulin release more closely than currently available rapid-acting insulin products. Fiasp® is insulin aspart (NovoRapid®) in which two excipients (L-arginine and niacinamide) have been added, L-arginine serving as a stabilising agent, while niacinamide being responsible for accelerated initial absorption after subcutaneous administration. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of insulin faster aspart have the potential to better reproduce the fast endogenous prandial insulin secretion and thereby to improve postprandial glucose control compared with insulin aspart. The onset phase 3 programme compares head-to-head insulin faster aspart to insulin aspart. Studies showed significant reductions in postprandial glucose increment (in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients), and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C, in type 1 diabetes), without markedly increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. A post hoc analysis of pooled data from six clinical trials conducted in patients with type 1 diabetes confirmed the beneficial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin faster aspart (earlier plasma insulin appearance, early insulin exposure two times greater and earlier offset of exposure of insulin faster aspart versus insulin aspart).

L'insuline aspart ultra-rapide («faster aspart¼), commercialisée sous le nom de Fiasp®, est de l'insuline aspart modifiée dans le but de reproduire, de manière plus proche que ne le font les préparations d'insuline à action rapide actuellement disponibles, la sécrétion physiologique prandiale d'insuline. Fiasp® est constituée d'insuline aspart (commercialisée sous le nom de Novorapid®) à laquelle deux excipients (L-arginine et nicotinamide) ont été ajoutés, la L-arginine comme agent stabilisateur de la préparation et la nicotinamide pour favoriser une absorption initiale accélérée après administration sous-cutanée. Les caractéristiques pharmacocinétiques de l'insuline faster aspart présentent le potentiel de mieux mimer la sécrétion précoce d'insuline qui suit le repas et, de ce fait, de contrôler, de manière plus efficace, l'hyperglycémie postprandiale en comparaison à ce que l'on observe avec de l'insuline aspart. Le programme onset d'études cliniques de phase 3 vise à comparer directement l'insuline faster aspart à l'insuline aspart. Ces études ont démontré une réduction significative des augmentations de la glycémie postprandiale (chez les sujets diabétiques de type 1 et de type 2) et de l'hémoglobine glyquée (HbA1C, dans le diabète de type 1), sans augmenter sensiblement le risque d'hypoglycémie. Une analyse post hoc de données rassemblées à partir de six études cliniques réalisées dans le diabète de type 1 a confirmé le bénéfice du profil pharmacocinétique et pharmacodynamique de l'insuline faster aspart par rapport à l'insuline aspart (apparition plasmatique plus précoce de l'insuline et exposition initiale à l'insuline deux fois plus importante, avec une durée d'exposition raccourcie).

Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review.

The inability to achieve optimal diabetes glucose control in people with diabetes is multifactorial, but one contributor may be inadequate control of postprandial glucose. In patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin, both the dose and timing of meal-related rapid-acting insulin are key factors in this. There are conflicting opinions and evidence on the optimal time to administer mealtime insulin. We performed a comprehensive literature search to review the published data, focusing on the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of rapid-acting insulin analogues, together with postprandial glucose excursion data, suggest that administering these 15-20 min before food would provide optimal postprandial glucose control. Data from clinical studies involving people with Type 1 diabetes receiving structured meals and rapid-acting insulin analogues support this, showing a reduction in post-meal glucose levels of ~30% and less hypoglycaemia when meal insulin was taken 15-20 min before a meal compared with immediately before the meal. Importantly, there was also a greater risk of postprandial hypoglycaemia when patients took rapid-acting analogues after eating compared with before eating.

Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) before, during and after Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who fasted during Ramadan. METHODS: In this multinational, randomised, treat-to-target trial, patients with T2DM who intended to fast and were on basal, pre- or self-mixed insulin ±â€¯oral antidiabetic drugs for ≥90 days were randomised (1:1) to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) or BIAsp 30 BID. Treatment period included pre-Ramadan treatment initiation (with insulin titration for 8-20 weeks), Ramadan (4 weeks) and post-Ramadan (4 weeks). Insulin doses were reduced by 30-50% for the pre-dawn meal (suhur) on the first day of Ramadan, and readjusted to the pre-Ramadan levels at the end of Ramadan. Hypoglycaemia was analysed as overall (severe or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L [56 mg/dL]), nocturnal (00:01-05:59) or severe (requiring assistance of another person). RESULTS: During the treatment period, IDegAsp (n = 131) had significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates with similar glycaemic efficacy, versus BIAsp 30 (n = 132). During Ramadan, despite achieving significantly lower pre-iftar (meal at sunset) self-measured plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference: -0.54 mmol/L [-1.02; -0.07]95% CI, p = .0247; post hoc) with similar overall glycaemic efficacy, IDegAsp showed significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates versus BIAsp 30. CONCLUSIONS: IDegAsp is a suitable therapeutic agent for patients who need insulin for sustained glucose control before, during and after Ramadan fasting, with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, versus BIAsp 30, an existing premixed insulin analogue.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin aspart assessed by use of the isoglycemic clamp method in healthy cats.

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of insulin aspart in healthy cats following intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) injection. Eight healthy, purpose-bred cats were used in a randomized, crossover study design. Each cat had 2 isoglycemic clamps performed, one after receiving 0.25 IU/kg of insulin aspart by IM injection and one after receiving the same dose by SC injection. The two isoglycemic clamps were performed on different days, at least 48 h apart. The blood glucose, plasma endogenous insulin, and plasma insulin aspart concentrations were measured and the glucose infusion rate (GIR) was recorded during the clamp. The GIR over time was used to create a time-action curve for each clamp which was used to describe the PD of insulin aspart. Data that are normally distributed are reported as mean ± SD, while data that are not normally distributed are reported as median (25-75 percentile). When compared to the PD data that have been reported for regular insulin in healthy cats, insulin aspart had a more rapid onset (IM: 10 min [10-21.25 min], SC: 12.5 min [10-18.75 min]) and shorter duration of action (IM: 182.5 ± 34.33 min, SC: 159.38 ± 41.87 min). The onset of action (P = 0.795), time to peak action (P = 0.499), duration of action (P = 0.301), and total metabolic effect (P = 0.603) did not differ with route of administration; however, SC administration did result in a higher maximum plasma insulin aspart concentration (IM: 1,265.17 pmol/L [999.69-1,433.89 pmol/L], SC: 3,278.19 pmol/L [2,485.29-4,132.01 pmol/L], P = 0.000) and larger area under the insulin aspart vs time curve (IM: 82,662 ± 30,565 pmol/L, SC: 135,060 ± 39,026 pmol/L, P = 0.010). Insulin aspart has a rapid onset of action and short duration of effect in healthy cats when administered by IM and SC injection. Although it cannot be assumed that the PD and PK of insulin aspart will be the same in cats with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), our data support further investigation into the use of SC insulin aspart as an alternative to regular insulin for the treatment of DKA in cats.

Pharmacological Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Faster aspart is a new formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) produced by adding the excipients niacinamide and L-arginine. As this new, "ultra-rapid insulin" is available in the EU-market and Canada, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data is summarized. RECENT FINDINGS: Faster aspart shows an earlier onset of appearance of insulin in the bloodstream after subcutaneous administration and an earlier onset of glucose-lowering action and a higher glycemic effect within the first 30 min. Faster aspart administered by pump is indeed faster than conventional aspart with a faster on (- 11 min), faster off (- 24 min), and more than 100% greater insulin action within the first 30 min. Tolerability of faster aspart is similar to that of Iasp; the same holds true for compatibility in pump use. Faster aspart shows a faster occurrence of insulin in the blood compared with IAsp in subcutaneous injection. Improvements over current analogs may be more pronounced in pumps than with injections. Data from phase IIIa studies confirm the reduction of postprandial glucose excursions that can be achieved with faster aspart.

Pharmacological properties of faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

AIM: To evaluate the pharmacological characteristics of faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) compared with insulin aspart (IAsp) during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 48 men and women aged 18 to 64 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) received faster aspart and IAsp as a 0.15 U/kg bolus dose via CSII, on top of a basal rate (0.02 U/kg/h), in a glucose clamp setting (target 5.5 mmol/L). RESULTS: After a CSII bolus dose, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles for faster aspart were left-shifted compared with those for IAsp. For faster aspart vs IAsp, the early glucose-lowering effect (area under the curve for glucose infusion rate [GIR]0-30min ) was approximately 2-fold higher (least squares means 24.9 vs 11.4 mg/kg; estimated ratio faster aspart/IAsp 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.33; 5.04]; P = .002), onset of glucose-lowering effect (time to early 50% of maximum GIR) occurred 11.1 minutes earlier (41.1 vs 52.3 minutes; 95% CI faster aspart - IAsp [-15.4; -6.9]; P<.001), and offset of glucose-lowering effect (time to late 50% of maximum GIR) occurred 24.0 minutes earlier (214.7 vs 238.7 minutes; 95% CI [-38.9; -9.1]; P=.002). Likewise, significantly greater early exposure and significantly earlier onset and offset of exposure were observed for faster aspart vs IAsp. Faster aspart and IAsp were both well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T1DM using CSII, faster aspart better mimics the endogenous prandial insulin secretion and action than does IAsp. Faster aspart therefore has the potential to provide clinical benefits over current rapid-acting insulins in the insulin pump setting.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Aspart Across a Clinically Relevant Dose Range in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Absorption of current rapid-acting insulins is too slow for patients with diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal postprandial glucose control. Faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart in a new formulation with faster early absorption. We compared the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of faster aspart and insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, crossover trial, 46 subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus received single subcutaneous doses of faster aspart and insulin aspart at 0.1, 0.2 (repeated three times to estimate within-subject variability) and 0.4 U/kg in a euglycaemic clamp setting (target 5.5 mmol/L). RESULTS: Consistently for the three doses, faster aspart demonstrated faster onset and greater early absorption and glucose-lowering effect versus insulin aspart. Across all three doses, onset of appearance occurred approximately twice as fast (approximately 5 min earlier) and early insulin exposure (AUCIAsp,0-30min) was approximately 1.5- to 2-fold greater for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Likewise, onset of action occurred approximately 5 min faster and early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0-30min) was approximately 1.5- to 2-fold larger for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Relative bioavailability was approximately 100% and total glucose-lowering effect was similar for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Dose-concentration and dose-response relationships were comparable between faster aspart and insulin aspart. Within-subject variability in glucose-lowering effect was low for faster aspart (coefficient of variation approximately 20%) and not significantly different from insulin aspart. CONCLUSION: The faster onset and greater early insulin exposure and glucose-lowering effect with faster aspart versus insulin aspart are preserved across a broad range of doses and consistently observed from day to day. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02033239.

Clinical use of the co-formulation of insulin degludec and insulin aspart.

AIMS: To provide a review of the available data and practical use of insulin degludec with insulin aspart (IDegAsp). Premixed insulins provide basal and prandial glucose control; however, they have an intermediate-acting prandial insulin component and do not provide as effective basal coverage as true long-acting insulins, owing to the physicochemical incompatibility of their individual components, coupled with the inflexibility of adjustment. The molecular structure of the co-formulation of IDegAsp, a novel insulin preparation, allows these two molecules to coexist without affecting their individual pharmacodynamic profiles. METHODS: Clinical evidence in phase 2/3 trials of IDegAsp efficacy and safety in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) have been assessed and summarised. RESULTS: In people with T2DM, once- and twice-daily dosing provides similar overall glycaemic control (HbA1c ) to current modern insulins, but with lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. In prior insulin users, glycaemic control was achieved with lower or equal insulin doses vs. other basal+meal-time or premix insulin regimens. In insulin-naïve patients with T2DM, IDegAsp can be started once or twice-daily, based on individual need. People switching from more than once-daily basal or premix insulin therapy can be converted unit-to-unit to once-daily IDegAsp, although this strategy should be assessed by the physician on an individual basis. CONCLUSIONS: IDegAsp offers physicians and people with T2DM a simpler insulin regimen than other available basal-bolus or premix-based insulin regimens, with stable daytime basal coverage, a lower rate of hypoglycaemia and some flexibility in injection timing compared with premix insulins.

Insulin analogues display atypical differentiative activities in skin keratinocytes.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that both insulin and IGF1 lead to increased proliferation of keratinocytes. However, whereas insulin supports keratinocytes differentiation, IGF1 inhibits this process. The aim of the present study was to examine the proliferative and differentiative effects of insulin analogues (glargine, detemir, lispro and aspart) in primary keratinocytes in comparison with insulin and IGF1. METHODS: Primary keratinocytes cultures were produced from newborn BALB/c mice skin. Proliferation rates were assessed by [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation and XTT assays and differentiation was evaluated by Western blots analysis. Insulin receptor and IGF1 receptor phosphorylation was assessed by immunoprecipitation assays. RESULTS: Treatment with glargine or detemir resulted in an insulin-like effect on the differentiation process whereas lispro and aspart treatment led to an IGF1-like effect. In addition, treatment of keratinocytes with aspart led to a rapid phosphorylation of the IGF1 receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that insulin analogues elicit atypical actions in the skin.