Patient-reported disability progression outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an outcomes-based agreement.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes-based agreements (OBAs) are agreements between payers and manufacturers in which payment for medications is tied to patient outcomes. These contracts aim to measure the value of prescription medications on predefined clinical indicators in real-world patient populations. OBAs are gaining traction in the United States as the health care industry shifts from volume-based to value-based care. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an appealing therapeutic area for OBAs because of its prevalence, high cost of medications, and multiple effective therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: To describe findings from an OBA that was prospectively conducted in a large regional health system for patients with MS taking interferon ß-1a or dimethyl fumarate. METHODS: In this prospective real-world analysis, commercial or health insurance exchange members were included based on the parameters of the OBA. Disability progression was assessed using a patient-reported outcome, patient-determined disease steps (PDDS). In the OBA, members aged 18 years or older with an MS diagnosis were included in the contract. A baseline score was collected for eligible members, with follow-up scores occurring between a 90-day and 180-day postbaseline score. If a follow-up score was greater than the baseline score, a subsequent PDDS score was collected between 90-days and 120-days to determine if the PDDS score remained elevated, indicating that the member had disability progression. RESULTS: During the contract period, 410 patients were eligible for PDDS collection, with 241 and 169 patients in the dimethyl fumarate and interferon ß-1a cohorts, respectively. There were 162 patients who were lost to follow-up, and 64 patients who were ineligible per contract parameters. Of the remaining 184 eligible patients (107 on dimethyl fumarate and 77 on interferon ß-1a), 21 (11%) patients had confirmed disability progression (6 on dimethyl fumarate [5.6%] and 15 on interferon ß-1a [19.5%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that meaningful patient-reported outcomes, such as disability progression, can be operationalized in an innovative OBA.

Cost-effectiveness of oral versus injectable disease modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system. There are two types of drugs used to treat this disease: injectable and oral drugs. The present study aimed at systematically reviewing the cost effectiveness of oral versus injectable drugs. METHODS: The researchers searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies. After removing the duplicates, two authors independently assessed the records. The studies that had conducted full economic evaluations of oral versus injectable drugs in MS patients were included. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool was also used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Thirty studies that had conducted the economic analysis of oral versus injectable therapies in MS patients were included in this review. The QHES scores for all records were generally high (≥ 77) and they were of good quality. The lowest and highest levels of incremental net monetary benefit were respectively obtained through the comparison of Fingolimod and Alemtuzumab (-1,419,333) and the comparison of Teriflunomide and Interferon ß-1a (1,792,810). The amount of INMB (incremental net monetary benefit) in the comparisons between oral and injectable drugs showed that the highest and lowest amount of INMB calculated between) Fingolimod and injectable drugs, respectively, compared to (interferon ß-1a) 98,253 and (Ocrelizumab) -212,417, the highest amount in dimethyl fumarate is also against (peginterferon ß-1a) 191,470 and the lowest against (alemtuzumab) -124,333, Teriflunomide against injectable drugs is the highest against (peginterferon ß-1a) 89,956 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) - 194,169, as well as Cladribine compared to injectable drugs, the highest was compared to (interferon ß-1a) 236,430 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) was 23,965. CONCLUSION: A large number of health economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS were available at the international level, the comparison of which was difficult and sometimes contradictory. However, despite the difference in the results, Cladribine tablets were cost-effective in all studies compared with injectable drugs. In addition, the present study could be of great importance for policymakers and other beneficiaries regarding the cost-effectiveness of the aforementioned drugs.

Efficacy and safety of peginterferon beta-1a compared to interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: A phase 3, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial (PEGINTEGRITY).

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent, disabling, inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease that typically manifests during a highly productive stage of life. Interferon beta-1a was among the first approved disease-modifying therapies for MS and remains among the first-line treatment options. Pegylation of the interferon beta-1a molecule prolongs its half-life while maintaining its efficacy and safety profile. In PEGINTEGRITY study, we aimed to compare peginterferon beta-1a with interferon beta-1a in terms of efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. METHODS: This study was a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center Phase 3 trial conducted in Iran in participants with RRMS. Participants received 125 µg of subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a every two weeks or 30 µg of intramuscular interferon beta-1a once a week for up to 96 weeks. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of peginterferon beta-1a to interferon beta-1a in reducing annualized relapse rate (ARR). Other outcomes included the number of patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression, the number of new or newly-enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions, the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, the number of new T1 hypointense lesions, the volume of new or newly-enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions, changes in brain volume, immunogenicity, and safety assessments. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled and assigned to two arms of the study, each consisting of 84 participants. Totally, 41 participants (24 patients in the peginterferon beta-1a group and 17 patients in the interferon beta-1a group) were withdrawn from the study. The withdrawn patients were included in the per-protocol analysis for the period of time they were in the study. In 96 weeks, in the per-protocol population, the ARR was 0.05 in the peginterferon beta-1a group versus 0.11 in the interferon beta-1a group, which does not reflect a statistically significant difference (p=0.09; 95 % CI, 0.18-1.14). Considering the upper limit of the one-sided 95 % CI of the rate ratio of peginterferon beta-1a compared to interferon beta-1a, as well as the non-inferiority margin, it can be concluded that the primary outcome was met. The results were also comparable for other efficacy and safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the non-inferiority of peginterferon beta-1a to interferon beta-1a with similar efficacy in 96-week ARR in RRMS patients. Both arms were also comparable in other efficacy outcomes and safety profiles with no statistically significant differences. These findings support considering peginterferon beta-1a as a safe and efficient option in patients with RRMS. This study was registered on Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201612306135N8) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05242133).

Comparative efficacy of diroximel fumarate, ozanimod and interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons.

Aim: Diroximel fumarate (DRF), ozanimod (OZA) and interferon beta-1a (IFN) are disease-modifying therapies approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. No randomized trials have compared DRF versus OZA and IFN. We compared DRF versus OZA and DRF versus IFN using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes, including annualized relapse rate (ARR), 12- and 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) and absence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions and new/newly enlarging T2 lesions. Patients & methods: We used individual patient data from EVOLVE-MS-1 (NCT02634307), a 2-year, open-label, single-arm, phase III study of DRF (n = 1057) and aggregate data from RADIANCE (NCT02047734), a 2-year, double-blind, phase III study that compared OZA 1 mg once daily (n = 433) and intramuscular IFN 30 µg once weekly (n = 441). To account for cross-trial differences, the EVOLVE-MS-1 population was restricted to those who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for RADIANCE, then weighted to match the average baseline characteristics of RADIANCE. Results: After weighting, DRF and OZA had similar ARRs (0.18 and 0.17, respectively), with a rate difference (DRF vs OZA) of 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.04 to 0.06). DRF had a lower ARR than IFN (0.18 and 0.28, respectively), with a rate difference (DRF vs IFN) of -0.10 (95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04) after weighting. Outcomes for 12- and 24-week CDP favored DRF versus OZA; 12-week CDP favored DRF versus IFN, but there was not strong evidence favoring DRF over IFN for 24-week CDP. Compared with OZA and IFN, DRF had higher proportions of patients without Gd+ T1 lesions and patients without new/newly enlarging T2 lesions. Conclusion: Disability progression and radiological outcomes were favorable for DRF versus OZA, although no differences were observed in ARR. Clinical and radiological outcomes generally favored DRF versus IFN. These findings may be informative for patients and clinicians considering different treatment options for MS.

Switching from injectable to other Disease Modifying Therapies may improve sexual dysfunction in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) a central nervous system autoimmune disorder, mainly affecting young adults and more prevalent among women, can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) among both males and females with MS. Female sexual dysfunction can be defined as dyspareunia, a lack of sexual desire, disorders in the arousal and orgasm phases, and sexual pain disorders. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in sexual function among females with MS whose treatment was switched from first-line injectable medications to other agents after a six-month duration. And assess the changes in all three domains of SD. METHODS: In this longitudinal study females diagnosed with MS, aged between 18 and 50 years old, and were candidates for switching their treatment from interferon beta-1a (intra-muscular and subcutaneous), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA), to Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), or Natalizumab (NTZ) due to patients' convenience and tolerability and adverse events were included. "Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19" was used to evaluate the SD changes before and six months after the new treatment initiation. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS V.24 software. Histograms and the Shapiro-Wilk test were used to assess the normality of the variables; due to the non-normal distribution of quantitative variables (except for age), the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the scores, before and six months after the medication change. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05. RESULTS: Out of 107 female participants (average age: 35.09 ± 5.61), The mean of overall MSISQ-19 scores, before and six months after the medication change were not significant (p-value = 0.091). However, considering the subdomains, the medication changes only affected the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 (p-value = 0.017). Still, the scores of other subdomains did not change significantly (p-value = 0.761 for primary SD and 0.479 for secondary SD). Also, there wasn't any significant difference between EDSS before and after the medication change (p-value = 0.461). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this was the first study, assessing the effect of MS medication change on the improvement of SD among patients. According to the results of the presented cross-sectional study, we found that during a six-month period, the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 symptoms improved significantly, while the changes in other SD domains were not significant.

Emulating randomised clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with non-randomised real-world evidence: an application using data from the MSBase Registry.

BACKGROUND: To mimic as closely as possible a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and calibrate the real-world evidence (RWE) studies against a known treatment effect would be helpful to understand if RWE can support causal conclusions in selected circumstances. The aim was to emulate the TRANSFORMS trial comparing Fingolimod (FTY) versus intramuscular interferon ß-1a (IFN) using observational data. METHODS: We extracted from the MSBase registry all the patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) collected in the period 2011-2021 who received IFN or FTY (0.5 mg) and with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria of the TRANSFORMS RCT. The primary endpoint was the annualised relapse rate (ARR) over 12 months. Patients were 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matched. Relapse-rate ratio (RR) was calculated by mean of a negative binomial regression. RESULTS: A total of 4376 patients with RRMS (1140 in IFN and 3236 in FTY) were selected. After PS, 856 patients in each group were matched. The ARR was 0.45 in IFN and 0.25 in FTY with a significant difference between the two groups (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.68; p<0.001). The result of the emulation was very similar and fell within the 95% CI of that observed in the RCT (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.64; p<0.001) with a standardised difference of 0.66 (p=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: By applying the same inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the RCT and employing appropriate methodology, we successfully replicated the RCT results with only minor discrepancies. Also, even if the confounding bias cannot be fully eliminated, conducting a rigorous target trial emulation could still yield valuable insights for comparative effectiveness research.

Utilization of peginterferon-ß-1a in the real-world practice for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Peginterferon ß-1a (PEG-IFN-ß-1a) is the most recent interferon beta formulation approved for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We aim to describe the real-world utilization of PEG-IFN-ß-1a in RRMS and compare it with other injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this population-based study, we used 2015-2019 routinely collected healthcare data of the Campania region of Italy from National Healthcare System DMT prescriptions, inpatient and outpatient clinical records of hospitals in Campania, and the Federico II University MS clinical registry for a subset of patients. We included individuals with RRMS receiving new prescriptions of PEG-IFN-ß-1a [n=281; age = 38.8±12.3 years; females=70.5%; disease duration = 8.4±8.3 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at baseline=2.0 (1.0-6.5)], glatiramer acetate [n=751; age = 46.0±11.4 years; females=67.1%; disease duration = 9.8±8.2 years; EDSS=4.0 (1.5-8.5)], and subcutaneous (SC) IFN-ß-1a [n=1,226; age = 39.7±11.7 years; females=66.5%; disease duration = 8.2±6.5 years; EDSS 2.5 (1.5-6.5)]. Adherence [medication possession ratio (MPR)], escalation to more effective DMTs, hospitalization rates and costs were measured. We used mixed-effect linear regression models (for adherence, hospitalization rates and costs) and Cox regression models (for escalation) to assess differences between PEG-IFN-ß-1a (statistical reference), glatiramer acetate, and SC IFN-ß-1a. All models included age, sex, previous treatment/untreated, year of treatment initiation, treatment duration, and adherence as covariates. RESULTS: Adherence was lower in glatiramer acetate (MPR = 0.91±0.1; Coeff=-0.11; p<0.01), and IFN-ß-1a (MPR = 0.92±0.1; Coeff=-0.08; p<0.01), compared with PEG-IFN-ß-1a (MPR = 1.01±0.1). The probability of escalating to more effective DMTs was higher for glatiramer acetate (14.9%; HR=4.09; p<0.01) and IFN-ß-1a (9.1%; HR=3.35; p=0.01), compared with PEG-IFN-ß-1a (4.9%). No differences in annualized hospitalization rates were identified between glatiramer acetate [annualized hospitalization rates (AHR) = 0.05±0.30; Coeff=0.02; p=0.31), IFN-ß-1a (AHR = 0.02±0.21; Coeff=0.01; p=0.97], and PEG-IFN-ß-1a (AHR = 0.02±0.24); however, monthly costs for MS admissions were higher for glatiramer acetate (€49.45±€195.27; Coeff=-29.89; p=0.03), compared with IFN-ß-1a (€29.42±€47.83; Coeff=6.79; p=0.61), and PEG-IFN-ß-1a (€23.91±€43.90). CONCLUSIONS: SC PEG-IFN-ß-1a and IFN-ß-1a were used in relatively similar populations, while glatiramer acetate was preferred in older and more disabled patients. PEG-IFN-ß-1a was associated with higher adherence and lower escalation rates toward more effective (and costly) DMTs.

Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different therapeutic strategies are available for the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), including immunomodulators, immunosuppressants and biological agents. Although each one of these therapies reduces relapse frequency and slows disability accumulation compared to no treatment, their relative benefit remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety, through network meta-analysis, of interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, daclizumab, laquinimod, azathioprine, immunoglobulins, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, diroximel fumarate, fludarabine, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mycophenolate mofetil, ofatumumab, ozanimod, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod and steroids for the treatment of people with RRMS. SEARCH METHODS: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers were searched on 21 September 2021 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. A top-up search was conducted on 8 August 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more of the available immunomodulators and immunosuppressants as monotherapy in comparison to placebo or to another active agent, in adults with RRMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We considered both direct and indirect evidence and performed data synthesis by pairwise and network meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 50 studies involving 36,541 participants (68.6% female and 31.4% male). Median treatment duration was 24 months, and 25 (50%) studies were placebo-controlled. Considering the risk of bias, the most frequent concern was related to the role of the sponsor in the authorship of the study report or in data management and analysis, for which we judged 68% of the studies were at high risk of other bias. The other frequent concerns were performance bias (34% judged as having high risk) and attrition bias (32% judged as having high risk). Placebo was used as the common comparator for network analysis. Relapses over 12 months: data were provided in 18 studies (9310 participants). Natalizumab results in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63; high-certainty evidence). Fingolimod (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57; moderate-certainty evidence), daclizumab (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; moderate-certainty evidence), and immunoglobulins (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months. Relapses over 24 months: data were reported in 28 studies (19,869 participants). Cladribine (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.64; high-certainty evidence), alemtuzumab (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68; high-certainty evidence) and natalizumab (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65; high-certainty evidence) result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Fingolimod (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.60; moderate-certainty evidence), dimethyl fumarate (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence), and ponesimod (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Glatiramer acetate (RR 0.84, 95%, CI 0.76 to 0.93; moderate-certainty evidence) and interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; moderate-certainty evidence) probably moderately decrease people with relapses at 24 months. Relapses over 36 months findings were available from five studies (3087 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate- or high-certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months was assessed in 31 studies (24,303 participants). Natalizumab probably results in a large reduction of disability worsening (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75; moderate-certainty evidence) at 24 months. Disability worsening over 36 months was assessed in three studies (2684 participants) but none of the studies used placebo as the comparator. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events data were available from 43 studies (35,410 participants). Alemtuzumab probably results in a slight reduction of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence). Daclizumab (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.63; moderate-certainty evidence), fingolimod (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.57; moderate-certainty evidence), teriflunomide (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.79; moderate-certainty evidence), interferon beta-1a (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20; moderate-certainty evidence), laquinimod (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.00 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence), natalizumab (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.05), and glatiramer acetate (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.14; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a slight increase in the number of people who discontinue treatment due to adverse events. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 35 studies (33,998 participants). There was probably a trivial reduction in SAEs amongst people with RRMS treated with interferon beta-1b as compared to placebo (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.54; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are highly confident that, compared to placebo, two-year treatment with natalizumab, cladribine, or alemtuzumab decreases relapses more than with other DMTs. We are moderately confident that a two-year treatment with natalizumab may slow disability progression. Compared to those on placebo, people with RRMS treated with most of the assessed DMTs showed a higher frequency of treatment discontinuation due to AEs: we are moderately confident that this could happen with fingolimod, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, laquinimod, natalizumab and daclizumab, while our certainty with other DMTs is lower. We are also moderately certain that treatment with alemtuzumab is associated with fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, and moderately certain that interferon beta-1b probably results in a slight reduction in people who experience serious adverse events, but our certainty with regard to other DMTs is lower. Insufficient evidence is available to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs in a longer term than two years, and this is a relevant issue for a chronic condition like MS that develops over decades. More than half of the included studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and this may have influenced their results. Further studies should focus on direct comparison between active agents, with follow-up of at least three years, and assess other patient-relevant outcomes, such as quality of life and cognitive status, with particular focus on the impact of sex/gender on treatment effects.

Ocrelizumab exposure in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 10-year analysis of the phase 2 randomized clinical trial and its extension.

Open-label extension (OLE) studies help inform long-term safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). We report exploratory analyses from a phase 2 trial on the longest follow-up to date of ocrelizumab-treated patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). The primary treatment period (PTP) comprised four 24-week treatment cycles; participants were randomized to double-blind ocrelizumab (2000 mg or 600 mg), placebo, or interferon ß-1a (open label) for one cycle, then dose-blinded ocrelizumab 1000 mg or 600 mg for the remaining cycles. The PTP was followed by consecutive assessed and unassessed treatment-free periods (TFPs) and then the OLE (ocrelizumab 600 mg every 24 weeks). Safety and efficacy were prospectively assessed. Of 220 participants randomized, 183 (84%) completed the PTP. After the TFP, 103 entered OLE (median OLE ocrelizumab exposure 6.5 years). Most common adverse events across all periods were infusion-related reactions. MRI activity, annualized relapse rate, and confirmed disability progression (CDP) rates remained low throughout. During the assessed TFP, there was a trend toward less and later B-cell repletion, and later CDP, for patients randomized to ocrelizumab; MRI activity was observed in 16.3% of patients, the earliest 24 weeks after the last ocrelizumab dose. This is the longest follow-up of ocrelizumab-treated patients with RRMS, with no new safety signals emerging during an observation period from 2008 to 2020. Results reinforce the sustained efficacy of long-term ocrelizumab. Reduced disease activity was maintained following interruption of 6-month dosing cycles, with no evidence of rebound.

Multiple sclerosis in Morocco: Epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic profile.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the clinical, therapeutic, and epidemiological profiles of MS patients in Morocco. METHODS: This descriptive study involved 170 patients representing four Morocco regions. We collected the data using an electronic survey. RESULTS: The results show female dominance in patients with MS. Besides, most patients present with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). The main clinical symptoms reported by patients are fatigue, cognitive issues, spasticity, bowel or bladder complaints, and visual issues. Furthermore, the findings show that almost half of the patients use Interferon bêta-1a and azathioprine as disease-modifying therapies; 60.5 % use traditional and complementary medicine, of which 30.6 % use cupping, 30 % recite the Holy Quran, and 28.2 % use apitherapy. The findings show that there is a statistically significant relationship between specific MS factors such as professional activity (p = 0.0071), degree of satisfaction with treatment (p = 0.005), stress (p = 0.014), and the frequency of relapses. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to DMT, patients also use traditional and complementary medicine. There is also a relationship between some epidemiological characteristics and the frequency of relapses in patients with MS.

The impact of metformin use on the outcomes of relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis patients receiving interferon beta 1a: an exploratory prospective phase II open-label randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating neurodegenerative disorder. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and some oxidative stress parameters can accelerate the demyelination process. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of metformin as an adjuvant therapy to interferon beta 1a (IFNß-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. METHOD: Eighty RRMS patients were equally divided into 2 groups: the intervention group receiving IFNß-1a plus 2 gm of metformin once daily and the control group receiving IFNß-1a alone. Interleukin 17 (IL17), interleukin 22 (IL22), malondialdehyde (MDA), T2 lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were assessed at the baseline and then after 6 months. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). After 6 months, the change in the median (interquartile range) of the results for both the intervention and control group were; IL17 (- 1.39 (4.19) vs - 0.93 (5.48), p = 0.48), IL22 (- 0.14 (0.48) vs - 0.09 (0.6), p = 0.53), and EDSS (0 vs 0, p = 1), respectively. The mean (standard deviation) change in MDA for the intervention and control group was - 0.93 (2.2) vs - 0.5 (2.53), p = 0.038, respectively. For MRI results, 21 patients had stationary and regressive course and 1 patient had a progressive course in the intervention arm vs 12 patients had stationary and regressive course and 4 had a progressive course in the control arm, p = 0.14. CONCLUSION: Adding metformin to IFNß-1a demonstrated a potential effect on an oxidative stress marker (MDA). However, there is no statistically significant effect on immunological, MRI and clinical outcomes. We recommend larger scale studies to confirm or negate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05298670, 28/3/2022.

Disease progression in the first 5 years of treatment in multiple sclerosis: Predictive value of early brain and lesion volume changes.

BACKGROUND: Whether the degree of inflammation (and its resolution) and neurodegeneration after treatment initiation predicts disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived brain and lesion volume (LV) changes in years 1 and 2 of treatment for disease progression. METHODS: Patients receiving early interferon beta-1a treatment in REFLEX/REFLEXION (N = 262) were included. Predictive regression models included new/enlarging LV (positive activity), disappearing/shrinking LV (negative activity), and global/central atrophy during years 1 and 2. RESULTS: Faster global atrophy and/or pseudo-atrophy and positive lesion activity in years 1 and 2 related to an increased probability and faster conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). Negative lesion activity in year 1 and slower central atrophy in year 2 were predictive of confirmed disability progression (9-Hole Peg Test). Positive lesion activity in year 2 was predictive of faster global atrophy, while positive lesion activity in years 1 and 2 was predictive of faster central atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: A higher degree of global atrophy and/or pseudo-atrophy in year 1 was predictive of CDMS. Positive lesion activity in any year was related to CDMS and neurodegeneration. Disability was related to negative lesion activity in year 1 and slower central atrophy in year 2.

Development of IFNß-1a versions with reduced immunogenicity and full in vitro biological activity for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

IFNß (recombinant interferon Beta) has been widely used for the treatment of Multiple sclerosis for the last four decades. Despite the human origin of the IFNß sequence, IFNß is immunogenic, and unwanted immune responses in IFNß-treated patients may compromise its efficacy and safety in the clinic. In this study, we applied the DeFT (De-immunization of Functional Therapeutics) approach to producing functional, de-immunized versions of IFNß-1a. Two de-immunized versions of IFNß-1a were produced in CHO cells and designated as IFNß-1a(VAR1) and IFNß-1a(VAR2). First, the secondary and tertiary protein structures were analyzed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Then, the variants were also tested for functionality. While IFNß-1a(VAR2) showed similar in vitro antiviral activity to the original protein, IFNß-1a(VAR1) exhibited 40% more biological potency. Finally, in vivo assays using HLA-DR transgenic mice revealed that the de-immunized variants showed a markedly reduced immunogenicity when compared to the originator.

Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system that affects mainly young adults (two to three times more frequently in women than in men) and causes significant disability after onset. Although it is accepted that immunotherapies for people with MS decrease disease activity, uncertainty regarding their relative safety remains. OBJECTIVES: To compare adverse effects of immunotherapies for people with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), and to rank these treatments according to their relative risks of adverse effects through network meta-analyses (NMAs). SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, two other databases and trials registers up to March 2022, together with reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included participants 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of MS or CIS, according to any accepted diagnostic criteria, who were included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined one or more of the agents used in MS or CIS, and compared them versus placebo or another active agent. We excluded RCTs in which a drug regimen was compared with a different regimen of the same drug without another active agent or placebo as a control arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods for data extraction and pairwise meta-analyses. For NMAs, we used the netmeta suite of commands in R to fit random-effects NMAs assuming a common between-study variance. We used the CINeMA platform to GRADE the certainty of the body of evidence in NMAs. We considered a relative risk (RR) of 1.5 as a non-inferiority safety threshold compared to placebo. We assessed the certainty of evidence for primary outcomes within the NMA according to GRADE, as very low, low, moderate or high. MAIN RESULTS: This NMA included 123 trials with 57,682 participants. Serious adverse events (SAEs) Reporting of SAEs was available from 84 studies including 5696 (11%) events in 51,833 (89.9%) participants out of 57,682 participants in all studies. Based on the absolute frequency of SAEs, our non-inferiority threshold (up to a 50% increased risk) meant that no more than 1 in 18 additional people would have a SAE compared to placebo. Low-certainty evidence suggested that three drugs may decrease SAEs compared to placebo (relative risk [RR], 95% confidence interval [CI]): interferon beta-1a (Avonex) (0.78, 0.66 to 0.94); dimethyl fumarate (0.79, 0.67 to 0.93), and glatiramer acetate (0.84, 0.72 to 0.98). Several drugs met our non-inferiority criterion versus placebo: moderate-certainty evidence for teriflunomide (1.08, 0.88 to 1.31); low-certainty evidence for ocrelizumab (0.85, 0.67 to 1.07), ozanimod (0.88, 0.59 to 1.33), interferon beta-1b (0.94, 0.78 to 1.12), interferon beta-1a (Rebif) (0.96, 0.80 to 1.15), natalizumab (0.97, 0.79 to 1.19), fingolimod (1.05, 0.92 to 1.20) and laquinimod (1.06, 0.83 to 1.34); very low-certainty evidence for daclizumab (0.83, 0.68 to 1.02). Non-inferiority with placebo was not met due to imprecision for the other drugs: low-certainty evidence for cladribine (1.10, 0.79 to 1.52), siponimod (1.20, 0.95 to 1.51), ofatumumab (1.26, 0.88 to 1.79) and rituximab (1.01, 0.67 to 1.52); very low-certainty evidence for immunoglobulins (1.05, 0.33 to 3.32), diroximel fumarate (1.05, 0.23 to 4.69), peg-interferon beta-1a (1.07, 0.66 to 1.74), alemtuzumab (1.16, 0.85 to 1.60), interferons (1.62, 0.21 to 12.72) and azathioprine (3.62, 0.76 to 17.19). Withdrawals due to adverse events Reporting of withdrawals due to AEs was available from 105 studies (85.4%) including 3537 (6.39%) events in 55,320 (95.9%) patients out of 57,682 patients in all studies. Based on the absolute frequency of withdrawals, our non-inferiority threshold (up to a 50% increased risk) meant that no more than 1 in 31 additional people would withdraw compared to placebo. No drug reduced withdrawals due to adverse events when compared with placebo. There was very low-certainty evidence (meaning that estimates are not reliable) that two drugs met our non-inferiority criterion versus placebo, assuming an upper 95% CI RR limit of 1.5: diroximel fumarate (0.38, 0.11 to 1.27) and alemtuzumab (0.63, 0.33 to 1.19). Non-inferiority with placebo was not met due to imprecision for the following drugs: low-certainty evidence for ofatumumab (1.50, 0.87 to 2.59); very low-certainty evidence for methotrexate (0.94, 0.02 to 46.70), corticosteroids (1.05, 0.16 to 7.14), ozanimod (1.06, 0.58 to 1.93), natalizumab (1.20, 0.77 to 1.85), ocrelizumab (1.32, 0.81 to 2.14), dimethyl fumarate (1.34, 0.96 to 1.86), siponimod (1.63, 0.96 to 2.79), rituximab (1.63, 0.53 to 5.00), cladribine (1.80, 0.89 to 3.62), mitoxantrone (2.11, 0.50 to 8.87), interferons (3.47, 0.95 to 12.72), and cyclophosphamide (3.86, 0.45 to 33.50). Eleven drugs may have increased withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo: low-certainty evidence for teriflunomide (1.37, 1.01 to 1.85), glatiramer acetate (1.76, 1.36 to 2.26), fingolimod (1.79, 1.40 to 2.28), interferon beta-1a (Rebif) (2.15, 1.58 to 2.93), daclizumab (2.19, 1.31 to 3.65) and interferon beta-1b (2.59, 1.87 to 3.77); very low-certainty evidence for laquinimod (1.42, 1.01 to 2.00), interferon beta-1a (Avonex) (1.54, 1.13 to 2.10), immunoglobulins (1.87, 1.01 to 3.45), peg-interferon beta-1a (3.46, 1.44 to 8.33) and azathioprine (6.95, 2.57 to 18.78); however, very low-certainty evidence is unreliable. Sensitivity analyses including only studies with low attrition bias, drug dose above the group median, or only patients with relapsing remitting MS or CIS, and subgroup analyses by prior disease-modifying treatments did not change these figures. Rankings No drug yielded consistent P scores in the upper quartile of the probability of being better than others for primary and secondary outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found mostly low and very low-certainty evidence that drugs used to treat MS may not increase SAEs, but may increase withdrawals compared with placebo. The results suggest that there is no important difference in the occurrence of SAEs between first- and second-line drugs and between oral, injectable, or infused drugs, compared with placebo. Our review, along with other work in the literature, confirms poor-quality reporting of adverse events from RCTs of interventions. At the least, future studies should follow the CONSORT recommendations about reporting harm-related issues. To address adverse effects, future systematic reviews should also include non-randomized studies.

Assessing the duration of EDSS improvement after a therapy start: A novel approach applied to the long-term extension of the PRISMS study.

BACKGROUND: In a chronic and progressive disease such as multiple sclerosis (MS), the improvement on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) can be a transient event. Therefore, estimating the prevalence of disability improvement over time, accounting both for improvement incidence and duration, is of interest. The aim of this study was to show the application of a simple estimator for the proportion of patients with sustained improvement over time using data from the long-term extension of the PRISMS trial. METHODS: A total of 534 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients from the PRISMS trial were included. Patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 were excluded. Patients were randomized to placebo (n = 178), subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN ß-1a) 22 µg (n = 181) or sc IFN ß-1a 44 µg (n = 175). At Year 2, patients receiving placebo were re-randomized to sc IFN ß-1a 22 µg or 44 µg (delayed sc IFN ß-1a) while patients receiving sc IFN ß-1a 22 µg or 44 µg continued their initial regimen. Patients were followed up for over 7 years post-randomization. Disability improvement was defined as a 1-point decrease in EDSS from baseline confirmed at 6 months. Prevalence of improvement was estimated as difference of Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimators while the cumulative incidence of improvement was calculated using the standard KM curves. RESULTS: No significant differences in cumulative incidence of EDSS improvement at 3 years between delayed sc IFN ß-1a (20.3%) and sc IFN ß-1a 22 µg (20.8%; p = 0.49) or 44 µg (21.3%; p = 0.33). When taking duration of improvement into account, the proportion of patients showing an improved condition after 3 years was 10.1% with delayed sc IFN ß-1a, 11.3% with sc IFN ß-1a 22 µg (p = 0.17) and 15.4% with sc IFN ß-1a 44 µg (p = 0.037) that was substantially maintained over the long term. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of this new statistical methodology, it is possible to estimate the time to improvement as well as the duration of improvement, information that is better suited to describing a non-final outcome like disability improvement. In this case, early sc IFN ß-1a 44 µg initiation had a greater proportion of patients with a sustained disability improvement over a long period of follow-up as compared to patients who had initially been randomized to placebo. In contrast, no significant differences on the cumulative incidence of improvement were observed.

Early use of high efficacy therapies in pediatric forms of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A real-life observational study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric forms of multiple sclerosis are more active than those in adults. Yet, the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches is not well studied in this population. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of the early use of high efficacy therapies (HETs) with the effectiveness of moderate efficacy therapies (METs) in children with MS. METHODS: This observational study included patients diagnosed with pediatric MS, at 4 hospital centers in France, during a 10-year period. METs included: interferon ß-1a, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide; HETs included: fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a new relapse, the secondary endpoint was EDSS worsening. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (80% women; mean age 15.5 years, 81% treated with MET) with a median follow-up of 22.5 months. At baseline, 52 patients were on MET (interferon ß-1a, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide) and 12 patients were on HET (natalizumab, ocrelizumab). The cumulative probability of being relapse-free at 6.5 years was 23.3% on MET, vs 90.9% on HET (p = 0.013). The cumulative probability of no EDSS worsening did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients starting with METs had much higher clinical disease activity than those starting early with HETs. Rapid initiation of more aggressive treatment may allow better disease control; however, the data on EDSS worsening are not conclusive.

Interferon Beta-1a versus Glatiramer Acetate: Changes of Innate Immunity in a Group of Women with Multiple Sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune demyelinating disease that secondarily leads to axonal loss and associated brain atrophy. Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) have previously been studied for their ability to affect specific immunity. This study investigates the effect of interferon beta-1a (INF) and glatiramer acetate (GA) administration on changes in innate immunity cell populations. METHODS: Sixty Caucasian female patients with relapsing-remitting MS undergo blood sample testing for 15 blood parameters at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment by GA or IFN (started as their first-line DMD). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in the change after 6 months was found in the parameter monocytes (relative count) in the group of patients treated with IFN. The median increase was 27.8%. Changes in many of the other 15 parameters studied were 10-20%. CONCLUSION: Innate immunity has long been neglected in MS immunopathology. The findings suggest that IFN treatment may modulate the immune response in MS by affecting monocyte function and may provide insight into the mechanisms of action of IFN in MS.

Impact of interferon beta exposure on birth outcome and child development - Results from the post-authorisation safety study PRIMA.

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta therapies are well-established disease-modifying treatments for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Based on clinical evidence from two large cohort studies, both, the EMA and FDA updated the labels of the interferon beta class in terms of pregnancy and breastfeeding in 2019 and 2020, respectively. To complement pregnancy label updates with patient-reported real-world data, this study examined German pregnancy and outcome reports including available data on child development from women with MS treated with peginterferon beta-1a or intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a. METHODS: The post-authorisation safety study PRIMA included adult women diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome, who were treated with peginterferon beta-1a or IM interferon beta-1a before or during pregnancy and registered in the marketing authorisation holder's MS Service center patient support program. In the prospective part of the study, conducted from April to October 2021, data on developmental milestones of the newborns were collected via telephone interview from mothers reporting live births. RESULTS: In total, 426 women were enrolled, reporting 542 pregnancies that resulted in 466 live births. A total of 162 women completed the questionnaire for 192 live births (53.1% male). Newborns had Apgar scores indicative of healthy infants. Weight, length and head circumference at birth and physical growth curves up to 48 months lay within the expected range of the German general population. Most newborn screenings and examinations during check-ups were inconspicuous over the study period of 48 months. Out of 158 breastfed infants, 112 (70.9%) were breastfed exclusively until month 5. CONCLUSION: Study results confirmed former reports indicating that exposure to interferon beta therapies during pregnancy or lactation had no adverse effects on intrauterine growth and child development over the study period, which covered the first 4 years of life. These real-world data obtained within the scope of a patient support program for peginterferon beta-1a or IM interferon beta-1a corroborate German and Scandinavian registry data and support the label update of all interferon beta therapies. REGISTRATION: NCT04655222, EUPAS38347.

Assessment of adherence to, and persistence with, an electromechanical autoinjector for subcutaneous interferon beta-1a injections for multiple sclerosis treatment over 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Self-administration of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN ß-1a) can be achieved with the RebiSmart® electromechanical autoinjector. This study investigated adherence to, and duration of persistence with, the newest version of the device (v1.6) among 2644 people receiving sc IFN ß-1a for multiple sclerosis (MS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study utilized data from RebiSmart® devices, recorded on the MSdialog database, between January 2014 and November 2019. Adherence and persistence were evaluated over a 3-year period and assessed in relation to age, sex, injection type, and injection depth. RESULTS: The population of RebiSmart® users (N = 2644) comprised of 1826 (69.1%) females and mean age was 39 (range 16-83) years. Adherence to RebiSmart® use and data transfer to the MSdialog database was consistently high (mean 91.7%; range 86.8-92.6%), including across all variables (81.6-100%). Mean (±SD) persistence during the study period was 1.35 ± 1.06 years, with a maximum recorded persistence of 5.1 years. In multivariate analysis, the longest durations of persistence were observed among older individuals and males (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0078, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: People living with MS were highly adherent to use of the RebiSmart® device, with higher persistence generally observed for older and/or male individuals.

It is important for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) to take their medication regularly ­ and to keep doing so ­ in order to control their symptoms. Some people with MS receive a medication called interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) as a subcutaneous injection (given just under the skin), and the RebiSmart® electromechanical autoinjector was designed to help them to self-inject such medication. This study aimed to find out whether people were using the RebiSmart® device as often as they should be, and how long they continued to use it for. Information was taken from the MSdialog database, which recorded peoples' use of the RebiSmart® device between January 2014 and November 2019. Records for 2644 people using the device were analyzed. Results showed that the RebiSmart® device was used most of the time (around 91.7%). On average, people kept using the device for around a year and 4 months before stopping. This duration was generally longer for men compared with women, and longer for older people than younger people. These results increase our understanding of how people are using the RebiSmart® device to treat their MS symptoms.