Comprehensive Analysis of Blood Test Results Predicting Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Whole-brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Blood tests, such as those included in the validated LabBM score (laboratory parameters in patients with brain metastases) predict survival after treatment of brain metastases. The model incorporates five test results [serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, platelets and hemoglobin]. However, many other abnormalities, albeit less well-studied, may be present in patients with metastatic cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to examine a broader range of blood tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 132 patients managed with primary whole-brain radiotherapy. Additional tests, such as liver enzymes, lymphopenia, hyponatremia, and others, were also conducted. Extracranial disease extent was also analyzed. RESULTS: According to forward conditional Cox regression analyses, blood tests (albumin, hemoglobin, lymphopenia, hyponatremia) in conjunction with the number of organs affected by extracranial metastases (at least two, such as liver and bones) provided the best prognostic model. Based on these parameters, at least four prognostic strata can be assigned (median survival between 4.6 and <1 months, p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: This initial pilot study in a limited number of patients suggests that numerous blood test results may contribute to further refinement of existing prognostic models, and provides justification for additional large-scale studies.

Randomized self-controlled study comparing open-face vs. closed immobilization masks in fractionated cranial radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare patient discomfort and immobilisation performance of open-face and closed immobilization masks in cranial radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center randomized self-controlled clinical trial. At CT simulation, an open-face and closed mask was made for each patient and treatment plans with identical dose prescription were generated for each mask. Patients were randomised to start treatment with an open-face or closed mask. Masks were switched halfway through the treatment course; every patient was their own control. Patients self-reported discomfort, anxiety and pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Inter- and intrafraction set-up variability was measured with planar kV imaging and a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for the open-face masks. RESULTS: 30 patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors were randomized - 29 completed radiotherapy to a median total dose of 54 Gy (range 30-60 Gy). Mean discomfort VAS score was significantly lower with open-face masks (0.5, standard deviation 1.0) vs. closed masks (3.3, standard deviation 2.9), P < 0.0001. Anxiety and pain VAS scores were significantly lower with open-face masks (P < 0.0001). Closed masks caused more discomfort in infraorbital (P < 0.001) and maxillary (P = 0.02) areas. Two patients and 27 patients preferred closed or open-face masks, respectively. Interfraction longitudinal shifts and roll and yaw rotations were significantly smaller and lateral shifts were significantly larger with closed masks in combination with the laser system (P < 0.05) compared to open masks in combination with a SGRT system. Intrafraction variability did not differ between the masks. CONCLUSIONS: Open-face masks are associated with decreased patient discomfort without compromising patient positioning and immobilisation accuracy.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) has been questioned in the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the efficacy of PCI in patients with LS-SCLC. Three electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to April 2022. All relevant publications were included based on the inclusion criteria, and survival data and brain metastasis (BM) rates were extracted and pooled. Ten studies were selected which involved 532 patients who received PCI and 613 patients who did not receive PCI. In pooled estimates, PCI significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.82, p <0.001; HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.97, p = 0.03, respectively]. Additionally, the use of PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of brain metastasis (BM, risk ratio = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90, p = 0.009). In subgroup analyses. The authors found that the PCI effects on OS were independent of region and the use of brain imaging after initial treatment. These findings demonstrate that PCI improves OS and PFS while decreasing the risk of BM in patients with LS-SCLC, implying that PCI remains necessary even in the MRI era. Key Words: Prophylactic cranial irradiation, Small cell lung cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging, Brain metastasis.

Survival prediction in patients with gynecological cancer irradiated for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This large population-based, retrospective, single-center study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases (BM) from gynecological cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and forty four patients with BM from gynecological cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) were identified. Primary cancer diagnosis, age, performance status, number of BM, presence of extracranial disease, and type of BM treatment were assessed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariable analysis. A prognostic index (PI) was developed based on scores from independent predictors of OS. RESULTS: Median OS for the entire study population was 6.2 months. Forty per cent of patients died within 3 months after start of RT. Primary cancer with the origin in cervix or vulva (p = 0.001),  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 3-4 (p < 0.001), and the presence of extracranial disease (p = 0.001) were associated with significantly shorter OS. The developed PI based on these factors, categorized patients into three risk groups with a median OS of 13.5, 4.0, and 2.4 months for the good, intermediate, and poor prognosis group, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Patients with BM from gynecological cancers carry a poor prognosis. We identified prognostic factors and developed a scoring tool to select patients with better or worse prognosis. Patients in the high-risk group have a particular poor prognosis, and omission of RT could be considered.

Predicting overall survival and prophylactic cranial irradiation benefit in small-cell lung cancer with CT-based deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning model to predict overall survival (OS) among small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and identify patients who could benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) based on OS signature risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively included 556 SCLC patients from three medical centers. The training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts comprised 309, 133, and 114 patients, respectively. The OS signature was built using a unified fully connected neural network. A deep learning model was developed based on the OS signature. Clinical and combined models were developed and compared with a deep learning model. Additionally, the benefits of PCI were evaluated after stratification using an OS signature. RESULTS: Within the internal and external validation cohorts, the deep learning model (concordance index [C-index] 0.745, 0.733) was far superior to the clinical model (C-index: 0.635, 0.630) in predicting OS, but slightly worse than the combined model (C-index: 0.771, 0.770). Additionally, the deep learning model had excellent calibration, clinical usefulness, and improved accuracy in classifying survival outcomes. Remarkably, patients at high risk had a survival benefit from PCI in both the limited and extensive stages (all P < 0.05), whereas no significant association was observed in patients at low risk. CONCLUSIONS: The CT-based deep learning model exhibited promising performance in predicting the OS of SCLC patients. The OS signature may aid in individualized treatment planning to select patients who may benefit from PCI.

A new updated prognostic index for patients with brain metastases (BMs) treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the era of precision oncology. METASNCore project.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative WBRT is the main treatment for multiple BMs. Recent studies report no benefit in survival after WBRT compared to palliative supportive care in patients (pts) with poor prognosis. A new era of systemic treatment strategies based on targeted therapies are improving the prognosis of patients with BMs. The purpose of this study is to develop a prognostic score in palliative pts with BMs who undergo WBRT in this new setting. METHODS: 239 pts with BMs who received palliative WBRT between 2013-2022 in our center were analyzed retrospectively. The score was designed according to the value of the ß coefficient of each variable with statistical significance in the multivariate model using Cox regression. Once the score was established, a comparison was performed according to Kaplan-Meier and was analyzed by log-rank test. RESULTS: 149 pts (62.3%) were male and median (m) age was 60 years. 139 (58,2%) were lung cancer and 35 (14,6%) breast cancer. All patients received 30Gys in 10 sessions. m overall survival (OS) was 3,74 months (ms). 37 pts (15,5%) had a specific target mutation. We found that 62 pts were in group < 4 points with mOS 6,89 ms (CI 95% 3,18-10,62), 84 in group 4-7 points with mOS 4,01 ms (CI 95% 3,40-4,62) and 92 pts in group > 7 points with mOS 2,72 ms (CI 95% 1,93-3,52) (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: METASNCore items are associated with OS and they could be useful to select palliative pts to receive WBRT. More studies are necessary to corroborate our findings.

A large open access dataset of brain metastasis 3D segmentations on MRI with clinical and imaging information.

Resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are standard treatments for brain metastases (BM) but are associated with cognitive side effects. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) uses a targeted approach with less side effects than WBRT. SRS requires precise identification and delineation of BM. While artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed for this, their clinical adoption is limited due to poor model performance in the clinical setting. The limitations of algorithms are often due to the quality of datasets used for training the AI network. The purpose of this study was to create a large, heterogenous, annotated BM dataset for training and validation of AI models. We present a BM dataset of 200 patients with pretreatment T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and FLAIR MR images. The dataset includes contrast-enhancing and necrotic 3D segmentations on T1 post-contrast and peritumoral edema 3D segmentations on FLAIR. Our dataset contains 975 contrast-enhancing lesions, many of which are sub centimeter, along with clinical and imaging information. We used a streamlined approach to database-building through a PACS-integrated segmentation workflow.

Glasgow prognostic score for assessing the efficacy of whole-brain radiation therapy in cases of recursive partitioning analysis class 2 and class 3 multiple brain metastases: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) may not be beneficial for patients with brain metastases (BMs). The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is a suggested prognostic factor for malignancies. However, GPS has never been assessed in patients with BMs who have undergone WBRT. The purpose of this study was to determine whether GPS can be used to identify subgroups of patients with BMs who have a poor prognosis, such as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class 2 and Class 3, and who will not receive clinical prognostic benefits from WBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 Japanese patients with BMs were treated with WBRT between May 2008 and October 2015. We examined GPS, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), RPA, graded prognostic assessment (GPA), number of lesions, tumor size, history of brain surgery, presence of clinical symptoms, and radiation doses. RESULTS: The overall median survival time (MST) was 6.1 months. seventeen patients (9.4%) were alive more than 2 years after WBRT. In univariate analysis, KPS ≤ 70 (p = 0.0066), GPA class 0-2 (p = 0.0008), > 3 BMs (p = 0.012), > 4 BMs (p = 0.02), patients who received ≥ 3 Gy per fraction (p = 0.0068), GPS ≥ 1 (p = 0.0003), and GPS ≥ 2 (p = 0.0009) were found to significantly decrease the MST. Patients who had brain surgery before WBRT (p = 0.036) had a longer survival. On multivariate analysis, GPS ≥ 1 (p = 0.008) was found to significantly decrease MST. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that GPS ≥ 1 indicates a poor prognosis in patients undergoing WBRT for intermediate and poor prognosis BMs.

Patient reported outcomes following whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases in NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) are a common complication in advanced cancer patients, and extremely challenging to treat. Consequently, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains the standard palliative intervention for patients with BM. The present study set to evaluate the clinical benefits of WBRT by assessing the quality of life (QoL) in WBRT-treated patients with BM, in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, hospital-based single-centre study. Consecutive sampling methodology was used to recruit 52 patients with BM undergoing WBRT. Patients were followed up on days 7, 30, 90 and 180 after WBRT. The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BN20 were employed to report patients' responses. The likert scale responses were linearly converted into 0 - 100 scores, and the descriptive analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0, at 95% confidence interval, using the two-tailed t-test for continuous variables or the chi-square test for categorical values. The overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan Maier method and the difference tested with Log-rank method, considering the interval from the baseline until death or end of the study. RESULTS: The study cohort was predominantly females (82.7%), and accordingly, 65.4% of the respondents had a breast primary tumor. A goodness-of-fit test yielded non-significant Chi square Pearson (p = 0.325) and Deviance (p = 1.000) residuals, indicating the best fit. The median overall survival was 180 days (~ 6 months). A total of 20 patients (38%) that survived up to 180 days reported alleviated symptoms and better functioning. A significant improvement in physical functioning (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p = 0.031) was reported at 180 days post WBRT, compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: WBRT is an effective palliative intervention in patients with BM, resulting in improved QoL. More than 50% of patients that survived ~ 3 months reported alleviation of pain, and 38% of patients that survived for ~ 6 months reported a significantly improved functioning. This demonstrated the clinical benefits of WBRT in palliative care and will add to the body of data on the use of WBRT, from Africa.

Hippocampal sparing radiation therapy for brain metastases: treatment techniques and clinical implementation.

High doses of radiation to the hippocampus have been correlated with increased cognitive decline following radiation therapy for brain metastases. To mitigate these effects, a variety of hippocampal sparing techniques have been implemented for both whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The goal of this review article is to provide a practical resource for the clinical implementation of hippocampal-sparing radiation therapy, starting with a brief background on the function and delineation of the hippocampal structure, as well as radiation effects on the hippocampus and the most widely recommended dose constraints. Considerations for treatment simulation are discussed, including options for cranial immobilization and optional head tilt. Hippocampal sparing has been demonstrated for WBRT using helical TomoTherapy, static intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a variety of patient setup positions, beam arrangements, and planning parameters. Tomotherapy has been shown to achieve slightly greater hippocampal sparing in some studies, while VMAT enables the most efficient treatment delivery. Hippocampal sparing has also been evaluated in a wide range of studies for both GammaKnife and linear accelerator (LINAC)-based SRS, with the proximity of metastases to the hippocampus being the most significant predictor of hippocampal dose. The methods and resulting hippocampal doses from these studies on both WBRT and SRS are discussed, as well as the role of automation in hippocampal sparing radiation therapy.

The Impact of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation and Consolidative Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Transition to the Chemo-Immunotherapy Era: A Single Institution Series.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to have poor survival due to its aggressive behavior, despite improvements with incorporation of immunotherapy with standard chemotherapy. Controversy exists regarding the role of consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in ES-SCLC due to high recurrence rates. We report our institutional result of the benefit of PCI and TRT in ES-SCLC. METHODS: Patients with ES-SCLC without intracranial metastasis at diagnosis (N = 163) were included. All patients completed systemic therapy with or without immunotherapy based on time of standard of care. Cohorts were divided by systemic therapy use and further subdivided by treatment with PCI and TRT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for comparison. The effects of TRT and PCI were estimated by multivariable (MVA) Cox regression. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (45.4%) received TRT, and 33.1% (n = 54) received PCI. The median follow-up was 11 months (3-85 months). PCI improved median OS to 15 months from 10 months, P = .02) and median PFS to 8.5 months from 5 months (P = .02) which remained significant on MVA, P = .02 and P = .02, respectively. TRT improved OS on UVA (P = 0.002) but was not significant on MVA. TRT did not improve PFS. CONCLUSION: This study including chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy suggests improved outcomes with addition of PCI in patients with ES-SCLC while TRT did not show benefit to either OS or PFS. A future trial is needed to evaluate the role of TRT and PCI in the era of chemo-immunotherapy.

Whole brain radiation therapy resulting in radionecrosis: a possible link with radiosensitising chemoimmunotherapy.

Radionecrosis describes a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. In clinical practice, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used in combination with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy, either concurrently or sequentially. There is a paucity of literature regarding radionecrosis in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone (without additional SRS) in combination with immunotherapy or targeted therapies. It is observed that certain combinations increase the overall radiosensitivity of the tumorous lesions. We present a rare case of symptomatic radionecrosis almost 1 year after WBRT in a patient with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer on third-line chemoimmunotherapy. We discuss available research regarding factors that may lead to radionecrosis in these patients, including molecular and genetic profiles, specific drug therapy combinations and their timing or increased overall survival.

Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. Concerns include an increasing number of brain metastases being associated with poor survival, the lack of prospective, randomised data and an increased risk of toxicity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall survival of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery as primary therapy. The search strings were applied to MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Log hazard ratios and standard errors were estimated from each included study. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was applied using the derived log hazard ratios and standard errors on studies which included a control group. RESULTS: 15 studies were included for systematic review. 12 studies were used for pooled analysis for overall survival at set time points, with a predicted 12 month survival of 20-40%. The random-effects meta-analysis in five studies of overall survival comparing ten or greater metastases against control showed statistically worse overall survival in the 10 + metastases group (1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18, p-value = < 0.01, I2 = 6%). A funnel plot showed no evidence of bias. There was insufficient information for a meta-analysis of toxicity. DISCUSSION: Overall survival outcomes of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with SRS is acceptable and should not be a deterrent for its use. There is a lack of prospective data and insufficient real-world data to draw conclusions on toxicity. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021246115.

This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first of its kind in the literature and provides information on overall survival outcomes and toxicities encountered in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Centres treating patients with ten or more brain metastases are doing so based only on retrospective real-world data analyses, the vast majority of which are from single centres and single radiotherapy platforms. This review provides an additional evidence resource for practitioners of stereotactic radiosurgery to aide in the management of this difficult patient group. The methods used to predict survival outcomes through the calculation of log hazard ratios and standard errors allowed analysis of small, retrospective case series. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of this patient group gives evidence for acceptable overall survival outcomes post-treatment, and provides further evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for these patients.Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

May we routinely spare hippocampal region in primary central nervous system lymphoma during whole brain radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: One of the main limiting factors of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is the impairment of neurocognitive functions (NCFs), which is mainly caused by radiation-induced injury to the hippocampus. With a view to preventing NCF impairment and personalizing treatment, we explored the feasibility of sparing the hippocampus during WBRT by correlating the sites of PCNSL lesions with the hippocampus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pre-treatment MR images from patients who underwent WBRT between 2010 and January 2020-and post-radiotherapy images in cases of relapse-were imported into the Varian Eclipse treatment-planning system and registered with the simulation CT. We constructed three 3-dimensional envelopes around the hippocampus at distances of 5, 10 and 15 mm and also contoured primary lesions and recurrences. RESULTS: We analyzed 43 patients with 66 primary lesions: 9/66 (13.6%) involved the hippocampus and 11/66 (16.7%) were located within 5 mm of it. Thirty-six lesions (54.5%) were situated more than 15 mm from the hippocampus, while 10/66 (15.2%) were between 5 and 15 mm from it. The most common location was in deep brain structures (31%). Thirty-five of the 66 lesions relapsed: in field in 14/35 (40%) and outfield in 21/35 (60%) in different sites. Globally, 16/35 recurrences (45.7%) were located in the hippocampus or within 5 mm of it. CONCLUSION: These data show that routinely sparing the hippocampus is not feasible. This approach could be considered in selected patients, when the lesion is more than 15 mm from the hippocampus.

Selecting the Appropriate Radiation Therapy Technique for Extensive Brain Metastases from Tens to Hundreds: Should the Latest Technique Always Be the Best Option?

Brain metastases (BMs) are one of the most common metastatic lesions in adult cancer patients and the most common intracranial neoplasms in adult patients. Especially for multiple BMs, historically, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been performed as the mainstay of therapy, which improves neurological symptoms and median survival. However, WBRT could negatively impact the patient's quality of life due to late complications. Owing to these complications, attempts have been made to use the latest radiotherapy (LRT) such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat BMs. However, for the extensive BMs (ranging from tens to hundreds), there are currently no prospective studies comparing WBRT with LRT such as IMRT or SRS. For extensive brain metastases, LRT cannot be the best option. Instead, upfront WBRT should be considered given its advantages and disadvantages, rather than LRT. We hope that faster and more reliable LRT for extensive BMs will be applicable for clinical practice without any clinical concerns in the near future.

Third whole-brain radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases. Should it be considered in selected patients?

Whole brain reirradiation for the treatment of multiple brain metastases has shown promising results. However, concerns remain over the possible neurotoxic effects of the cumulative dose as well as the questionable radiosensitivity of recurrent metastases. A second reirradiation of the whole brain is ordinarily performed in our department for palliative purposes in patients presenting with multiple metastatic brain progression. For this study, an investigational third whole brain reirradiation has been administered to highly selected patients to obtain disease control and delay progression. Clinical outcomes and neurological toxicity were also evaluated.

Palliative whole brain radiation therapy: an international state of practice.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in radiation delivery and systemic therapies have resulted in few remaining indications for palliative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Most centers preferentially use stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and reserve WBRT for those with >15 lesions, leptomeningeal presentation, rapidly progressive disease, or limited estimated survival. Despite regional differences among preferred dose, fractionation, and treatment technique, we predict survival post-WBRT will remain poor-indicating appropriate application of WBRT in this era of SRT and improved systemic therapies. METHODS: A multi-center, international retrospective analysis of patients receiving WBRT in 2022 was performed. Primary end point was survival after WBRT. De-identified data were analyzed centrally. Patients receiving WBRT as part of a curative regimen, prophylactically, or as bridging therapy were excluded. The collected data consisted of patient parameters including prescription dose and fractionation, use of neurocognitive sparing techniques and survival after WBRT. Survival was calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 29,943 international RT prescriptions written at ten participating centers in 2022, 462 (1.5%) were for palliative WBRT. Participating centers were in the United States (n=138), the United Kingdom (n=111), Hong Kong (n=72), Italy (n=49), Belgium (n=45), Germany (n=27), Ghana (n=15), and Cyprus (n=5). Twenty-six different dose regimens were used. The most common prescriptions were for 3,000 cGy over 10 fractions (45.0%) and 2,000 cGy over 5 fractions (43.5%) with significant regional preferences (P<0.001). Prior SRT was delivered in 32 patients (6.7%), hippocampal avoidance (HA) was used in 44 patients (9.5%), and memantine was prescribed in 93 patients (20.1%). Survival ranged from 0 days to still surviving at 402 days post-treatment. The global median overall survival (OS) was 84 days after WBRT [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.0-104.0]. Actuarial survival at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were 95%, 78%, 48%, and 32%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients (5.8%) were unable to complete their prescribed WBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This moment-in-time analysis confirms that patients with poor expected survival are being appropriately selected for WBRT-illustrating the dwindling indications for WBRT-and demonstrates the variance in global practice. Since poor survival precludes patients from deriving benefit, memantine and HA are best suited in carefully selected cases.

The incorporation of cognitive-sparing techniques into prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of small cell lung cancer.

The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains an important component in the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This is due to the high rates of subclinical brain metastases at the time of diagnosis. Following a response to initial treatment, PCI historically has been associated with improvements in overall survival and decreased development of brain metastases in patients with limited stage (LS-SCLC) and extensive stage (ES-SCLC) SCLC. However, PCI is commonly withheld in these settings in favor of observation, largely due to its association with cognitive sequelae following treatment. While randomized data has demonstrated that in patients with ES-SCLC, PCI may be withheld in favor of close MRI surveillance without a detriment in overall survival or cognitive functioning, these patients did not undergo formal neuropsychological assessments. In recent years, cognitive sparing techniques incorporated into whole brain radiation therapy and PCI, such as the addition of memantine and hippocampal avoidance, have demonstrated significant improvements in cognitive outcomes. As the overall survival in patients with SCLC continues to improve due to the incorporation of novel systemic therapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), the role of PCI and maximizing quality of life remains a highly relevant topic. This article reviews the role of PCI and cognitive-sparing techniques in the management of SCLC.

Hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in neurocognitive function. METHODS: PubMed was queried for studies involving hippocampal-avoidance radiation therapy and results were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed for median overall survival, progression-free survival, hippocampal relapse rates, and neurocognitive function testing. RESULTS: Of 3709 search results, 19 articles were included and a total of 1611 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 8 retrospective cohort studies. All studies evaluated hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with brain metastases. Hippocampal relapse rates were low (overall effect size = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.05]) and there was no significant difference in risk of relapse between the five studies that compared HA-WBRT/HA-PCI and WBRT/PCI groups (risk difference = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [- 0.02, 0.03]; p = 0.63). 11 out of 19 studies included neurocognitive function testing. Significant differences were reported in overall cognitive function and memory and verbal learning 3-24 months post-RT. Differences in executive function were reported by one study, Brown et al., at 4 months. No studies reported differences in verbal fluency, visual learning, concentration, processing speed, and psychomotor speed at any timepoint. CONCLUSION: Current studies in HA-WBRT/HA-PCI showed low hippocampal relapse or metastasis rates. Significant differences in neurocognitive testing were most prominent in overall cognitive function, memory, and verbal learning. Studies were hampered by loss to follow-up.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with 4-10 brain metastases: A nonrandomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no randomized evidence comparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. This prospective nonrandomized controlled single arm trial attempts to reduce the gap until prospective randomized controlled trial results are available. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with 4-10 brain metastases and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 from all histologies except small-cell lung cancer, germ cell tumors, and lymphoma. The retrospective WBRT-cohort was selected 2:1 from consecutive patients treated within 2012-2017. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors such as sex, age, primary tumor histology, dsGPA score, and systemic therapy. SRS was performed using a LINAC-based single-isocenter technique employing prescription doses from 15-20Gyx1 at the 80% isodose line. The historical control consisted of equivalent WBRT dose regimens of either 3Gyx10 or 2.5Gyx14. RESULTS: Patients were recruited from 2017-2020, end of follow-up was July 1st, 2021. 40 patients were recruited to the SRS-cohort and 70 patients were eligible as controls in the WBRT-cohort. Median OS, and iPFS were 10.4 months (95%-CI 9.3-NA) and 7.1 months (95%-CI 3.9-14.2) for the SRS-cohort, and 6.5 months (95%-CI 4.9-10.4), and 5.9 months (95%-CI 4.1-8.8) for the WBRT-cohort, respectively. Differences were non-significant for OS (HR: 0.65; 95%-CI 0.40-1.05; P =.074) and iPFS (P =.28). No grade III toxicities were observed in the SRS-cohort. CONCLUSION: This trial did not meet its primary endpoint as the OS-improvement of SRS compared to WBRT was non-significant and thus superiority could not be proven. Prospective randomized trials in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies are warranted.