Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AMA J Ethics ; 26(7): E527-533, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958421

RESUMEN

Evidence of harm reduction interventions' morbidity and mortality benefits is abundant and of high quality, so there are good reasons for regional and national groups to advocate for more widespread distribution of legally regulated "drug paraphernalia," including needles, syringes, and fentanyl test strips. But lack of consistency among states' laws means that patients' interstate travel can subject them to being charged with possession of illegal items. This commentary on a case offers guidance to clinicians looking to help patients understand legal risks of interstate travel with supplies that are prescribed or recommended to reduce harms of their drug use and explores the ethical responsibilities of physicians in jurisdictions that legally prohibit these harm reduction interventions.


Asunto(s)
Reducción del Daño , Humanos , Reducción del Daño/ética , Fentanilo , Jeringas/ética , Agujas , Estados Unidos , Equipos y Suministros/ética , Equipos y Suministros/provisión & distribución
2.
PLoS One ; 8(12): e80948, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24324650

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Since 1999, substantial efforts have been made by the international community to reduce the risks associated with unsafe injections, through ministries of health, international donors, the World Health Organization and the Safe Injection Global Network. The present study attempted to measure the progress, or lack thereof, made over the 2000-2010 decade in reducing unsafe injections in ten regions of the world corresponding to developing and transitional economies. METHODS: Data about the number of injections per person per year and the proportion of re-use of syringes and needles were obtained for 2010, mainly from population surveys, and compared with previous estimates for 2000 which had used various sources of information including injection safety assessments, population surveys and published studies on injection practices. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, in developing countries and transitional economies, the average number of injections per person per year decreased from 3.40 to 2.88, while the proportion of re-use of injection devices dropped from 39.8% to 5.5%. Combining both factors the number of unsafe injections per person per year decreased from 1.35 to 0.16. Even if substantial progress has been made, the Eastern Mediterranean region remains problematic, with 0.57 unsafe injections per person per year. In sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, people now receive on average only 0.04-0.05 unsafe injections per year. CONCLUSION: Substantial progress has been made in reducing the number of unsafe injections in developing countries and transitional economies, essentially through a reduction in the re-use of injection devices. In some regions, elimination of unsafe injections might become a reasonable goal.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Países en Desarrollo , Inyecciones/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos , Salud Global/economía , Salud Global/educación , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inyecciones/ética , Inyecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Agujas/ética , Agujas/estadística & datos numéricos , Jeringas/ética , Jeringas/estadística & datos numéricos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...