RESUMEN
Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a common, degenerative joint disease that causes chronic pain that affects daily life. Our study aims to evaluate geriatric patients aged 65 and over with knee pain in terms of osteoarthritis with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging and to investigate its relationship with meniscal pathologies. Methods: Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients aged 65-88 years with knee pain were evaluated in terms of knee osteoarthritis and staging was performed. Meniscal pathologies were evaluated in magnetic resonance imaging, and the prevalence of different meniscal lesion types was calculated. In addition, the relationship between knee osteoarthritis and meniscal pathologies was analyzed. Results: Radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis was found in 182 (84.2%) of the 216 cases in our study group. A strong correlation was found between the degrees of knee osteoarthritis on magnetic resonance imaging and radiography. At least one meniscus pathology was observed in all 182 radiography cases with knee osteoarthritis findings. At least one meniscus pathology was observed in 29 (85.3%) of those without osteoarthritis signs. It was determined that meniscus degeneration, tear, and extrusion were observed more frequently in patients with knee osteoarthritis than in patients without osteoarthritis. Meniscal extrusion and complex and horizontaltype tears were the most common lesions. Conclusions: Osteoarthritis was found to be common in geriatric patients with knee pain. A correlation was found between radiography and magnetic resonance imaging regarding knee osteoarthritis. It was observed that meniscal pathologies were detected more frequently in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Meniscos Tibiales , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Radiografía , Humanos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/patología , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/patología , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Prevalencia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/complicaciones , Menisco/diagnóstico por imagen , Menisco/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is influenced by factors such as meniscal tears and tibial plateau slope. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has reduced failure rates; however, its efficacy in high-risk patients remains unclear. This study hypothesized that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would yield similar clinical outcomes in patients with varying risks of ACL failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction between June 2018 and June 2021 were included. The medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee joint. The meniscal lesions were assessed during surgery. Preoperative clinical assessments and final follow-up were conducted using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner Activity scale. PROMs were collected at least two years postoperatively. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 32.5 ± 7.4 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative IKDC score, Lysholm score, or Tegner activity score between patients with or without medial meniscus injury (p = 0.155, 0.914, and 0.042, respectively), with or without lateral meniscus injury (p = 0.737, 0.569, and 0.942, respectively), medial tibial slope > 12° or ≤ 12° (p = 0.290, 0.496, and 0.988, respectively), or lateral tibial slope > 7.4° or ≤ 7.4° (p = 0.213, 0.625, and 0.922, respectively). No significant correlations were found between anterior tibial translation and postoperative IKDC (R = -0.058, p = 0.365), Lysholm (R = -0.017, p = 0.459), or Tegner activity scores (R = -0.147, p = 0.189). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction provides reliable and comparable clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk factors for ACL graft failure, such as increased tibial slope or meniscal injury. Our results suggest that the indications for ALL reconstruction may be expanded to include patients with a high tibial slope or meniscal injury, because these factors have been shown to contribute to increased rotational instability and high rates of ACL graft failure. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with large patient cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and establish clear guidelines for patient selection and surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Humanos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tibia/cirugía , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study investigates the potential of novel meniscal parameters as predictive factors for incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA) over a span of four years, as part of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) study. OBJECTIVES: Quantitative measurements of meniscal parameters alteration could serve as predictors of OA's occurrence and progression. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A nested matched case-control study design was used to select participants from OAI study. Case knees (n = 178) were defined as those with incident ROA (Kellgren Lawrence Grade (KLG) 0 or 1 at baseline (BL), evolving into KLG 2 or above by year 4). Control knees were matched one-to-one by sex, age and radiographic status with case knees. The mean distance from medial-to-lateral meniscal lesions [Mean(MLD)], mean value of tibial plateau width [Mean(TPW)] and the mean of the relative percentage of the medial-to-lateral meniscal lesions distance [Mean(RMLD)] were evaluated through coronal T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) MRI at P-0 (visit when incident ROA was found on radiograph), P-1(one year prior to P-0) and baseline, respectively. Using the imaging data of one patient, the mechanism was investigated by finite element analysis. RESULTS: Participants were on average 60.22 years old, predominantly female (66.7%) and overweight (mean BMI: 28.15). Mean(MLD) and Mean(RMLD) were significantly greater for incident knees compared to no incident knees at baseline, P-1 and P-0. [Mean(MLD), Mean(RMLD); (42.56-49.73) mean ± (7.70-9.52) mm SD vs. (38.14-40.78) mean ± (5.51-7.05)mm SD; (58.61-68.95) mean ± (8.52-11.40) mm SD vs. (52.52-56.35) mean ± (6.53-7.85)mm SD, respectively]. Baseline Mean(MLD) and Mean(RMLD), [Adjusted OR, 95%CI: 1.11(1.07 to 1.16) and 1.13(1.09 to 1.17), respectively], were associated with incident ROA during 4 years, However, Mean(TPW) [Adjusted OR, 95%CI: 0.98(0.94 to 1.02)] was not associated with incident ROA during 4 years. While Mean(TPW) at P-1 and P-0 was not associated with the risk of incident ROA, Mean(MLD) and Mean(RMLD) at P-1 and P-0 were significantly positively associated with the risk of incident ROA. CONCLUSIONS: The meniscal parameters alteration could be an important imaging biomarker to predict the occurrence of ROA.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Meniscos Tibiales , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Radiografía , Humanos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Incidencia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine whether the non-weight-bearing tunnel view X-ray is effective for short-term evaluation of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) by assessing the X-ray characteristics at the initial and follow-up visits. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of 26 enrolled knees diagnosed with MMPRT on magnetic resonance imaging. The distance between the medial tibial eminence and medial femoral condyle (MTE-MFC distance) and medial tibiofemoral joint (MTFJ) width were measured by obtaining non-weight-bearing tunnel view and frontal view X-ray radiographs. The initial and follow-up values at a median interval of 17 days were compared. Additionally, the correlations between the MTE-MFC distance increase rate and body mass index (BMI), age, femorotibial angle (FTA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were evaluated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The tunnel view images of the initial and follow-up X-rays showed a significant increase in the MTE-MFC distance and a significant decrease in the MTFJ width. Furthermore, a moderate correlation was observed between the change in the MTE-MFC distance and the time interval between X-rays. However, no substantial correlation was observed for the change in the MTFJ width over time. Moreover, no significant correlation was observed between the change in the MTE-MFC distance in the non-weight-bearing tunnel view and BMI, age, FTA, and PTS. CONCLUSIONS: The non-weight-bearing tunnel view is highly beneficial for evaluating MMPRT progression in the short term.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Longitudinales , Radiografía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Soporte de Peso , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) and morphologic characteristics of the bone. However, the association between distal femoral bone morphology and MMPRT, particularly the medial femoral posterior condyle, is poorly understood. Our study aimed to determine the association between the morphologic characteristics of the medial posterior femoral condyle and MMPRT. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed from January 2021 to January 2022. After screening based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two matched groups were analyzed: the MMPRT group and the isolated lateral meniscus tears group. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) were measured on radiographs; the medial tibial slope angle (MTSA), medial tibial plateau depth (MTPD), and radius of the medial femoral posterior condyle (RMFPC) were measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in both groups. The area under the curve (AUC) and the best cutoff value for predicting MMPRT were calculated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The final analysis included a total of 174 patients (87 MMPRT patients and 87 controls). Significant differences were shown in the RMFPC (17.6 ± 1.0 vs. 16.2 ± 1.0, p < 0.01) and MTSA (6.4 ± 2.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.01), which were larger than those of the control group. The MTPD (1.8 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.01) and HKA (175.4 ± 2.2 vs. 179.0 ± 2.7, p < 0.01) of the injury group were significantly different from the control group, and both were lower than the control group. However, between the MMPRT and control groups on the KLG (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.209), there was no statistically significant difference. Among them, the RMFPC cutoff value was calculated to be 16.8 mm by ROC curve analysis, and the sensitivity and specificity were both 81.61%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that larger RMFPC, MTSA, smaller MTPD, and HKA were all associated with MMPRT, and RMFPC ≥ 16.8 mm was considered as a significant risk factor for MMPRT.
Asunto(s)
Fémur , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/patología , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/patologíaRESUMEN
Knee medial compartment osteoarthritis is effectively treated by a medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). The feasibility and safety of MOWHTO for mild lateral meniscal tears are unknown. This study examined the feasibility and safety of knee joint weight-bearing line ratio (WBLr) adjustment during MOWHTO with lateral meniscal injuries. We used a healthy adult male's lower extremities computed tomography scans and knee joint magnetic resonance imaging images to create a normal fine element (FE) model. Based on this model, we generated nine FE models for the MOWHTO operation (WBLr: 40-80%) and 15 models for various lateral meniscal injuries. A compressive load of 650N was applied to all cases to calculate the von Mises stress (VMS), and the intact lateral meniscus' maximal VMS at 77.5% WBLr was accepted as the corrective upper limit stress. Our experimental results show that mild lateral meniscal tears can withstand MOWHTO, while severe tears cannot. Our findings expand the use of MOWHTO and provide a theoretical direction for practical decisions in patients with lateral meniscal injuries.
Asunto(s)
Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Articulación de la Rodilla , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Osteotomía , Estrés Mecánico , Tibia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Soporte de Peso , Humanos , Masculino , Osteotomía/métodos , Tibia/cirugía , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to study the relationship between the presence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign (DLFNS) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients and a higher posterior lateral tibial slope (LPTS), a reduced meniscal bone angle (MBA), a higher LPTS/MBA ratio and a higher incidence of concomitant injuries in primary ACL tears. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed in patients submitted to primary ACL reconstruction with an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Patients with ACL tears and a femoral impactation with a depth ≥2 mm were assorted to the DLFNS group and patients with ACL tear and without a DLFNS to the control group. LPTS and MBA were measured in MRI. The presence of concomitant injuries (meniscal, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and bone injuries) was assessed in MRI. Quantitative data are presented in the median ± interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS: There were 206 patients included in the study, with 46 patients assorted to the DLFNS group and 160 patients to the control group. In the DLFNS group, the median LPTS was 6.7° (IQR: 4.0-8.2) versus 4.0° in the control group (IQR: 2.2-6.5) (p = 0.003). The LPTS/MBA ratio was significantly higher in the DLFNS group, with a median of 0.32 (IQR: 0.19-0.44), in comparison to the control group, with a median of 0.19 (IQR: 0.11-0.31) (p < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the LPTS is an independent risk factor to having a DLFNS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.161; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.042-1.293, p = 0.007). There was a higher incidence of concomitant lateral meniscal injuries in the DLFNS group (67% vs. 48%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACL tears, the presence of a DLFNS is associated with a steeper lateral posterior tibial slope, as well as a higher incidence of concomitant lateral meniscal injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Fémur , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tibia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugíaRESUMEN
CASE: This report describes a new pattern of meniscal tear in an 18-year-old man after a knee sprain; he had undergone anterior cruciate ligament revision (ACL-R) 3 years earlier. He was diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture, a ramp lesion (Thaunat type 4), and a posterior root avulsion fracture of the medial meniscus (MM) (LaPrade type 5). He was treated successfully with an all-inside repair of the ramp lesion, a transtibial pull-out repair of the root tear, and ACL graft revision and anterolateral stabilization. CONCLUSION: This specific meniscal injury pattern should be recognized and documented, potentially warranting consideration as a new addition to Thaunat and LaPrade classifications as type 6.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to determine the optimal meniscal radiomic features to classify people who will develop an incident destabilizing medial meniscal tear. We used magnetic resonance (MR) images from an existing case-control study that includes images from the first 4 years of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). For this exploratory analysis (n = 215), we limited our study sample to people with (1) intact menisci at the OAI baseline visit, (2) 4-year meniscal status data, and (3) complete meniscal data from each region of interest. Incident destabilizing meniscal tear was defined as progressing from an intact meniscus to a destabilizing tear by the 48-month visit using intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed MR images. One reader manually segmented each participant's anterior and posterior horn of the medial menisci at the OAI baseline visit. Next, 61 different radiomic features were extracted from each medial meniscus horn. We performed a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to determine the classification rules and important variables that predict incident destabilizing meniscal tear. The CART correctly classified 24 of the 34 cases and 172 out of 181 controls with a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 95.0%. The CART identified large zone high gray level emphasis (i.e., more coarse texture) from the posterior horn as the most important variable to classify who would develop an incident destabilizing medial meniscal tear. The use of radiomic features provides sensitive and quantitative measures of meniscal alterations, allowing us to intervene and prevent destabilizing meniscal tears.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Meniscos Tibiales , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , RadiómicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous efforts to delineate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions, there is still a great deal of uncertainty regarding its diagnostic performance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase and included all articles, published before October 20, 2022, comparing the accuracy of MRI with that of arthroscopy as the gold standard for diagnosis of ramp lesions. We performed statistical analysis using Stata and Meta-DiSc software. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. RESULTS: This meta-analysis evaluated 21 diagnostic performance comparisons from 19 original research articles (2,149 patients). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnosing a ramp lesion were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.66 to 0.73), 0.88 (95% Cl, 0.86 to 0.89), 6.49 (95% Cl, 4.12 to 10.24), 0.36 (95% Cl, 0.28 to 0.46), 24.33 (95% Cl, 12.81 to 46.19), and 0.88, respectively. Meta-regression using different variables yielded the same results. CONCLUSIONS: MRI exhibited a DOR of 24.33 and moderate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing ramp lesions in ACL-deficient knees. However, arthroscopy using a standard anterolateral portal with intercondylar viewing is recommended to confirm a diagnosis of a ramp lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , ArtroscopíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anterior instability (AI) of the LM is potentially debilitating in young patients. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose AI is limited due to the lack of reliable and accurate MRI findings. The ability to identify AI preoperatively would potentially improve the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. This study presents a novel MRI finding ("phantom sign") for the detection of AI of the LM and demonstrates its reliability and accuracy. METHODS: Three independent blinded reviewers performed retrospective review of preoperative MRI for all patients who underwent LM repair between July 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, at a single center. Positive phantom sign was defined as abnormal signal intensity on MRI of the anterior horn of the LM on the coronal sequence at the anterior tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Preoperative MRI was also evaluated for other signs of LM anterior instability. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was assessed for rater scoring of presence of pathology on MRI. Predictive ability of each imaging finding with at least good (ICC 0.6 or above) reliability was also evaluated based on documented intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Fifty-five preoperative MRIs of arthroscopically treated LM tears were reviewed. Median age was 15 years (range 6 to 20), and 21 patients (38.2%) were female. Twenty-seven patients (49.1%) had a discoid meniscus. LM AI was present on arthroscopy for 25 knees (45.45%), and among these, 21 had discoid morphology. Interrater reliability was substantial for phantom sign (ICC 0.71, 97.5% CI: 0.55-0.82), posterior displacement (ICC 0.71, 97.5% CI: 0.55-0.82), and posterior "megahorn" (ICC 0.76, 97.5% CI: 0.62-0.85). On predictive analysis, phantom signs were 98% sensitive and 76.7% specific for LM AI. Posterior displacement and posterior megahorn were specific for AI (both 93.34%), though with limited sensitivity (32% and 28.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Phantom sign is a reliable and sensitive MRI finding for anterior instability, even in the absence of frank displacement on preoperative MRI. A positive finding should prompt a thorough arthroscopic evaluation of the anterior horn of the LM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-case control study.
Asunto(s)
Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Adolescente , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Masculino , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Artroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: The field of meniscal root preservation has undergone significant advancement over the past decades; however, the challenge remains to fully understand whether meniscal root repair can ultimately arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes. OBJECTIVE: To assess longitudinal changes in articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and progression to meniscal extrusion (ME) using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Medial meniscus posterior root tear was surgically induced in 39 New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM, n â= â13); root tear left in situ (CT, n â= â13); and transtibial root repair (RR, n â= â13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. High resolution 4.7 Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed at baseline, after 2-, and 4-months of post-surgery. Cartilage thickness was calculated in medial and lateral compartments. In addition, the evaluation of ME, subchondral bone edema and healing potential after root repair were assessed too. RESULTS: Progressive cartilage thinning, ME, and subchondral bone edema were evident in all 3 study groups after 4-months of follow-up. The mean cartilage thickness in the PM group was 0.53 âmm (±0.050), 0.57 âmm (±0.05) in the CT group, and 0.60 âmm (±0.08) in the RR group. The PM group exhibited significantly higher cartilage loss when compared to the CT and RR groups (p â< â0.001). Moreover, progressive ME and subchondral bone edema were associated with a more severe cartilage loss at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Meniscal root repair did not halt but rather reduced the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Degenerative changes worsened at a rapid rate in the PM group compared to the RR and CT groups. Early cartilage swelling, persistent subchondral edema, and progressive ME predicted a more severe progression to knee OA in the CT and RR groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Meniscos Tibiales , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Animales , Conejos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/patología , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Meniscectomía/métodos , Distribución Aleatoria , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugíaRESUMEN
CASE: A 36-year-old, 7-month pregnant woman presented to the office with a locked knee and a displaced bucket-handle medial meniscus tear, in the setting of chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. After thorough discussion with the patient and her husband, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist, the patient was treated with left knee ACL reconstruction and medial meniscus repair. CONCLUSION: With sufficient preoperative planning and coordinated multidisciplinary care among orthopaedic, anesthesiologist, and obstetric specialists, elective knee surgery can be performed safely in time-sensitive situations during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Laceraciones , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to perform a survey administered to members of the Meniscus International Network (MenIN) Study Group, seeking to delineate the most contentious aspects of meniscal extrusion classification and provide a foundation for new, more comprehensive definitions and treatments for these pathologies. METHODS: MenIN Study Group is a group of international experts treating and performing research on meniscus pathology and treatment. All MenIN Study Group members were asked to complete a survey aimed at establishing criteria for the optimal classification system for meniscal extrusion. Data obtained from the completed questionnaires were transferred into a spreadsheet and then analysed. All responses are presented as counts, percentages or means. RESULTS: Forty-seven (85.5%) MenIN Study Group members completed the survey and were included in this analysis. Key aspects recommended for inclusion in a comprehensive classification system for meniscal extrusion included laterality (93.6%), anatomical location (76.6%), patient age (76.6%), body mass index (BMI) (68.1%) and aetiology (68.1%). For classifying meniscal extrusion, 53.2% considered the distance in millimetres from the tibial plateau's outer margin as the most reliable measurement technique on imaging. Preferences for imaging modalities varied, with 44.7% favouring weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 36.2% opting for weight-bearing ultrasound due to its greater availability. Respondents advocated for a classification system addressing stability or progression of meniscal extrusion (66%), reducibility (53.2%), potential progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) (83%), influencing treatment approaches (83%), a gradation system (83%), consideration of dynamic factors (66%), association with clinical outcomes and prognosis (76.6%) and investigation around centralization procedures (57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings of this survey shed light on the global perspectives regarding meniscal extrusion classification. It was generally felt that a new classification of extrusion measured on MRI scans at the mid-tibial plateau should be developed, which considers factors such as laterality, anatomical location, age, BMI and aetiology. Additionally, the results support the integration of dynamic factors and clinical outcomes in MRI-based classifications to inform treatment approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Meniscos Tibiales , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no consensus on the need for investigating knee ligamentous and meniscal injuries in a patient with a tibial plateau fracture. Consequently, many soft tissue injuries are likely undiagnosed and therefore untreated. The impact this has on long term knee outcomes is not well defined. We aimed to identify the impacts of various diagnostic methods on the management of meniscal injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures and evaluate the clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane following Cochrane guidelines. We included studies that operatively managed tibial plateau fractures and soft tissue injuries, which were diagnosed with either preoperative MRI, intra-operative arthroscopy or arthrotomy. RESULTS: 18 articles with 884 people, with a mean age of 46.4 years were included. Soft tissue injuries were detected on MRI (32-73%) and arthroscopy (12-70%), of which the most common were lateral meniscal injuries (7-64% of tibial plateau fractures). When identified by arthroscopy and arthrotomy, these injuries were almost always treated, either by repair or debridement. The clinical outcomes of these patients were poorly reported, with a heterogenous use of patient reported outcome measures, and follow up time points. There were no randomised trials or control groups for comparative analysis, however operative treatment yielded good to excellent outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of concomitant soft tissue injuries with tibial plateau fractures, particularly lateral meniscal injuries. There are 2 main approaches to meniscal injuries: surgeons who don't investigate, don't treat, whilst surgeons who do investigate often do surgically treat. Although studies that treated these injuries achieved good to excellent results, the currently available evidence doesn't confirm treatment superiority. As there is plausibility for better outcomes, randomised studies are needed to further investigate this clinical question.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Fracturas de la Tibia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Artroscopía/métodos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Desbridamiento/métodos , Fracturas de la Meseta TibialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the proposed classification systems for meniscal ramp lesions (RLs) in the literature and evaluate their accuracy and reliability. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines utilising PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Level I-IV studies referencing RLs along with either an arthroscopic- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system used to describe RL subtypes were included. RESULTS: In total, 21 clinical studies were included. Twenty-seven (79%) of the included studies were published in 2020 or later. There were four main classification systems proposed within the literature (two arthroscopic-, two MRI-based), describing tear patterns, mediolateral extent, associated ligament disruption and stability of the lesion. The first classification was proposed in 2015 by Thaunat et al. and is referenced in 22 (64.7%) of the included studies. The application of the Thaunat et al. criteria to MRI showed variable sensitivity (31.70%-93.8%) and interobserver agreement (k = 0.55-0.80). The Greif et al. modification to the Thaunat et al. system was referenced in 32.4% of the included studies and had a substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.8). Stability to probing and specific tear location were each used to classify RLs in 28.6% and 23.8% of the included clinical studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there has been a recent increase in the recognition and treatment of meniscal RLs, there is limited consistency in descriptive classifications used for this pathology. Current RL classification systems based on preoperative MRI have variable reliability, and arthroscopic examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis and classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/clasificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can diagnose meniscal lesions anatomically, while quantitative MRI can reflect the changes of meniscal histology and biochemical structure. Our study aims to explore the association between the measurement values obtained from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) and Stoller grades. Additionally, we aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SyMRI in determining the extent of meniscus injury. This potential accuracy could contribute to minimizing unnecessary invasive examinations and providing guidance for clinical treatment. METHODS: Total of 60 (n=60) patients requiring knee arthroscopic surgery and 20 (n=20) healthy subjects were collected from July 2022 to November 2022. All subjects underwent conventional MRI and SyMRI. Manual measurements of the T1, T2 and proton density (PD) values were conducted for both normal menisci and the most severely affected position of injured menisci. These measurements corresponded to the Stoller grade of meniscus injuries observed in the conventional MRI. All patients and healthy subjects were divided into normal group, degeneration group and torn group according to the Stoller grade on conventional MRI. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to compare the T1, T2 and PD values of the meniscus among 3 groups. The accuracy of SyMRI in diagnosing meniscus injury was assessed by comparing the findings with arthroscopic observations. The diagnostic efficiency of meniscus degeneration and tear between conventional MRI and SyMRI were analyzed using McNemar test. Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was utilized for evaluation. RESULTS: According to the measurements of SyMRI, there was no statistical difference of T1 value or PD value measured by SyMRI among the normal group, degeneration group and torn group, while the difference of T2 value was statistically significant among 3 groups (P=0.001). The arthroscopic findings showed that 11 patients were meniscal degeneration and 49 patients were meniscal tears. The arthroscopic findings were used as the gold standard, and the difference of T1 and PD values among the 3 groups was not statistically significant, while the difference of T2 values (32.81±2.51 of normal group, 44.85±3.98 of degeneration group and 54.42±3.82 of torn group) was statistically significant (P=0.001). When the threshold of T2 value was 51.67 (ms), the maximum Yoden index was 0.787 and the AUC value was 0.934. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement values derived from SyMRI could reflect the Stoller grade, illustrating that SyMRI has good consistency with conventional MRI. Moreover, the notable consistency observed between SyMRI and arthroscopy suggests a potential role for SyMRI in guiding clinical diagnoses.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Menisco , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/patología , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Curva ROC , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Artroscopía/métodos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have assessed signal intensity after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears (MMPRTs) based on mid-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the quantitative signal intensity of repaired posterior roots over time, up to 3 years postoperatively, and the related factors. METHODS: This study included 36 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and MRI examinations using the same MRI system. The signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots was quantitatively evaluated using the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ). Medial meniscus extrusion (MME), the SNQ for MMPR, and clinical scores were assessed over 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: MME progressed over time until 3 years postoperatively, and its progression during this period was 1.61 ± 1.44 mm. The SNQ for MMPR decreased over time until 3 years postoperatively, and the change in the SNQ from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively (ΔSNQ) was 2.69 ± 1.69. All clinical scores significantly improved (p < 0.001). ΔSNQ was significantly correlated with body weight (correlation coefficient = -0.424, p = 0.010) and body mass index (correlation coefficient = -0.330, p = 0.050). However, ΔSNQ was not significantly correlated with preoperative or postoperative clinical scores. CONCLUSION: After pullout repair for MMPRTs, MME progressed to 3 years postoperatively. However, the signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots decreased, and clinical scores improved over time until 3 years postoperatively. Patient weight and body mass index were significantly correlated with the reduced signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots, suggesting that weight assessment in patients with MMPRTs is crucial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Artroscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Whether photographs included in the operative report of knee arthroscopies can make the surgeon liable in the event of a legal investigation remains unknown. The main objective of this study was to establish inter-observer reliability in determining the presence or absence of lesions of the cartilage, meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Secondary objective was to assess the inter-observer reliability in classifying lesions. METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a continuous serie of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy from the same operator. The photographs of each patient's operative report were presented separately to three experts, blinded to each other. Each expert had to decide on the presence or absence of injuries to the following structures: meniscal, cartilage and ACL and then, classify it. Primary and secondary endpoints were evaluated using the Fleiss' kappa index. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability for lesion detection was between 0.4 and 0.61 for all structures with three exceptions: for cartilage, it was low (0.15) at the lateral tibial plateau and poor (-0.01) at the external condyle. On the contrary, the concordance was almost perfect (0.8) for the ACL. For classifying cartilaginous and meniscal lesions, inter-observer reliability was poor (from 0.03 to 0.14), except for at the lateral meniscus (0.65). CONCLUSION: Inter-observer reliability of arthroscopic knee diagnoses is poor when photographs alone are used. In the event of a legal investigation following knee arthroscopy, the photographs included in the operative report should not be used alone to hold the surgeon liable.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite good clinical results, repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs) may not completely prevent knee osteoarthritis progression. This study evaluated changes in the medial joint space (MJS) during the first and second years after repair, compared to narrowing in the contralateral knee, using fixed-flexion view (FFV) radiographs. METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent pull-out repair for a unilateral MMPRT were included. FFV radiographs were obtained pre-operatively and at the 1- and 2-year post-repair timepoints to evaluate changes in the MJS and Kellgren-Lawrence grade bilaterally. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The change in the MJS was greater in MMPRT knees than in contralateral knees during the first year (0.48 ± 0.80 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.49 mm, p < 0.001), but this difference lessened in the second year (0.09 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.07 ± 0.38 mm, p = 0.285). Kellgren-Lawrence grade progression in MMPRT knees was less in the second year. Clinical outcomes significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years post-repair than the pre-operative values (p < 0.001), with continued improvement in clinical outcomes in the second year. There was no significant correlation between patient characteristics and the change in the MJS from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Pull-out repair for MMPRTs did not completely prevent MJS narrowing, but the rate of narrowing decreased in the second year (mean, 0.09 mm) compared to that in the first year (mean, 0.48 mm). MJS narrowing in the second year after MM posterior root repair was comparable to that of the contralateral knee. Clinical outcomes further improved over the second year after repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.