Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 350
Filtrar
1.
Am J Hematol ; 99(6): 1142-1165, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450850

RESUMEN

DISEASE OVERVIEW: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%-20% over 3-5 years). DIAGNOSIS: Newly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable). RISK STRATIFICATION: Several risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high-risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4-tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being "myeloproliferative (MP-CMML)" or "myelodysplastic (MD-CMML)," based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L. TREATMENT: ASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long-term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate-2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease-modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase-3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high-risk MP-CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%). UNIQUE DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS: These include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme-induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Mutación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas
2.
Br J Haematol ; 204(4): 1529-1535, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411250

RESUMEN

Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a rare haematological disorder characterized by monocytosis and dysplastic changes in myeloid cell lineages. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions and assessing prognosis. This study aimed to validate the Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (AIPSS-MDS) in CMML and to assess its performance compared with traditional scores using data from a Spanish registry (n = 1343) and a Taiwanese hospital (n = 75). In the Spanish cohort, the AIPSS-MDS accurately predicted overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS), outperforming the Revised-IPSS score. Similarly, in the Taiwanese cohort, the AIPSS-MDS demonstrated accurate predictions for OS and LFS, showing superiority over the IPSS score and performing better than the CPSS and molecular CPSS scores in differentiating patient outcomes. The consistent performance of the AIPSS-MDS across both cohorts highlights its generalizability. Its adoption as a valuable tool for personalized treatment decision-making in CMML enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from different therapeutic interventions. Future studies should explore the integration of genetic information into the AIPSS-MDS to further refine risk stratification in CMML and improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Leucemia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Inteligencia Artificial , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Br J Haematol ; 204(3): 749-750, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38066684

RESUMEN

The 2022 WHO Classification revised the diagnostic criteria of CMML and included the variant, formerly known as oligomonocytic CMML (O-CMML), into the CMML disease. CMML is currently subtyped into MD-CMML and MP-CMML. In a recent study, Castaño-Díez et al. showed that the newly included O-CMML has unique clinical features and is an independent favourable risk factor, and proposed to view O-CMML as an independent subtype of CMML, parallel to MD-CMML and MP-CMML. Commentary on: Castaño-Díez et al. Characteristics and long-term outcome in a large series of chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia patients including 104 formerly referred to as oligomonocytic. Br J Haematol 2024;204:892-897.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Pronóstico
4.
Blood ; 143(12): 1139-1156, 2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38064663

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematolymphoid tumors and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of 2022 introduced major changes to the definition of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). To assess its qualitative and quantitative implications for patient care, we started with 3311 established CMML cases (according to WHO 2017 criteria) and included 2130 oligomonocytosis cases fulfilling the new CMML diagnostic criteria. Applying both 2022 classification systems, 356 and 241 of oligomonocytosis cases were newly classified as myelodysplastic (MD)-CMML (WHO and ICC 2022, respectively), most of which were diagnosed as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to the WHO 2017 classification. Importantly, 1.5 times more oligomonocytosis cases were classified as CMML according to WHO 2022 than based on ICC, because of different diagnostic criteria. Genetic analyses of the newly classified CMML cases showed a distinct mutational profile with strong enrichment of MDS-typical alterations, resulting in a transcriptional subgroup separated from established MD and myeloproliferative CMML. Despite a different cytogenetic, molecular, immunophenotypic, and transcriptional landscape, no differences in overall survival were found between newly classified and established MD-CMML cases. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the most comprehensive analysis of routine CMML cases to date, both in terms of clinical characterization and transcriptomic analysis, placing newly classified CMML cases on a disease continuum between MDS and previously established CMML.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Consenso , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/patología , Leucocitosis , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Pronóstico , Compuestos Orgánicos
5.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 46(2): 286-293, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38083991

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) and Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) are increasingly represented in the general population. We propose a screening strategy based on algorithms calculated from quantitative and analytical data from the XN analyser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested the performance of previously published MDS and CMML scores on an evaluation cohort of 749 individual eligible patients over 50 years of age. These patients were classified into 3 groups as follows: 713 patients without MDS or CMML, 18 patients with MDS, and finally 18 patients with CMML. In a second step, a routine cohort of 37 828 samples was studied to evaluate the impact of this approach. RESULTS: The concordance rate between cytology and the two scores is 92.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of the CMML score are 100% and 96.2%, respectively. For the MDS score, they are 83.3% and 89.6% respectively. The ratio of platelets measured by fluorescence on board (PLT-F) as reflex tests generated is 1.5% after 6 months. The additional smear ratio for suspected MDS is calculated at 0.6%. CONCLUSION: We propose a flowchart using embedded artificial intelligence to help the cytologist in an optimized smear review and thus improve guidance to the clinician and the patients in the diagnosis process. This strategy permits a more comprehensive approach to MDS and CMML detection fitting with the new definition of CMML according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) published in 2022.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Inteligencia Artificial , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Plaquetas
6.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(2): 296-300, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37822035

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) are clonal myeloid malignancies, characterized by bone marrow failure leading to cytopenias (and possible myeloproliferation for CMML) and a high propensity to evolve to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and hematological features; the prevalence of MDS subtypes, R-IPSS, and the outcome of 106 Armenian MDS/CMML patients diagnosed over the 2008-2020 period in a single Armenian Hematology center and compare them to French MDS patients included in the GFM registry. RESULTS: Median age in the Armenian cohort was 64 years (range 19-84) and 55% were males. The main MDS subtypes were MDS-MLD (29.2%) and MDS-SLD (27.3%), the least frequent was del 5q (0.9%). By comparison, a higher prevalence of MDS-MLD, MDS-EB2, and MDS-RS was found in the French cohort. Armenian patients' cohort generally had poor access to standard MDS treatment and 42.3% of the patients were transfusion dependent. Overall survival, however, did not significantly differ between Armenian and French cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our study stresses issues regarding epidemiology, access to diagnosis, difficulties of risk stratification, and access to treatment.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/epidemiología , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/etiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Fallo de la Médula Ósea
7.
Br J Haematol ; 204(3): 892-897, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013238

RESUMEN

Recently modified diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) have lowered the cut-off for absolute monocytosis. In the largest series to date, we have analysed 313 CMML patients, including 104 with oligomonocytic (OM)-CMML. Five-year survival was longer for OM-CMML than for other patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified OM-CMML as a favourable prognostic factor (HR 0.58; p = 0.002). The 5-year cumulative incidence of progression to classical CMML was 47%. Older age and transfusion dependence were adverse prognostic factors for OM-CMML. Our results support the inclusion of OM-CMML in the CMML category as a subtype with superior outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucocitosis , Pronóstico
8.
Pathology ; 55(6): 827-834, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541805

RESUMEN

Monocyte subset partitioning by flow cytometry may be a useful tool in distinguishing chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) from other causes of monocytosis, however there has been varying success in real world implementation. Additionally, current assays require an individual tube for analysis despite significant overlap in antibodies used in routine T and NK cell analysis. The objective of this study was to validate a flow cytometry assay for the enumeration of monocyte subsets in our community-based laboratory and compare this to a hybrid panel allowing analysis of monocytes, T cells and NK cells in a single tube. Monocyte subset analysis was performed on peripheral blood samples of patients with monocytosis at the time of bone marrow biopsy or transient monocytosis in the setting of bacteraemia. Cut-offs of >94% classical and <1.13% non-classical monocytes for distinguishing CMML were assessed. Classical monocytes were significantly higher, and non-classical monocytes significantly lower in CMML compared to other causes of monocytosis. The sensitivity and specificity of >94% classical monocytes were 73% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-90%] and 89% (95% CI 75-96%) regardless of which panel was used. Non-classical monocytes of <1.13% had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% (95% CI 52-97%) and 83% (95% CI 68-92%) with the monocyte panel and 55% (95% CI 28-78%) and 89% (95% CI 75-96%) using the hybrid panel. We have found the estimation of the classical monocyte subset to be the most robust and repeatable variation of this assay with sensitivity and specificity that is clinically useful. A hybrid panel may provide an effective approach to implementing monocyte subsets into practice.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Monocitos , Humanos , Monocitos/patología , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Citometría de Flujo , Médula Ósea , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
10.
Int J Dermatol ; 62(10): 1228-1236, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37649236

RESUMEN

Myeloid neoplasms may metastasize to the skin, presenting a wide range of clinical-pathological features that often lead to a reduction in patients' survival. The presentation varies depending on the category of myeloid neoplasm and its prognostic significance. The literature has specifically focused on the features of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In this article, we aimed to uncover the peculiarities of clonal skin proliferations in the course of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). We conducted a systematic review and statistical analysis of the literature data. MPN patients mainly exhibited cutaneous extramedullary hematopoiesis, while a minority displayed cutaneous histiocytic lesions. Furthermore, these patients showed lower survival rates compared to the median survival of MPN patients, especially when calculating survival from the appearance of cutaneous lesions. Our work highlights, for the first time, the prognostic relevance and histological heterogeneity of cutaneous lesions in MPN. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of dermatological and histological examinations when cutaneous lesions are present.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Hematológicas , Hematopoyesis Extramedular , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Examen Físico , Piel
11.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 64(9): 1566-1573, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395413

RESUMEN

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) chacaterized by persistent peripheral blood monocytosis, hypercellular bone marrow and dysplasia at least in one myeloid lineage. CMML shares much of its molecular landscape with other myeloid neoplasms, while differs from others such as chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), given the high frequency of CSF3R mutations in the latter. In this article, we report a case of CSF3R-mutated CMML and dissect this rare entity by reviewing the medical literature, with the intent to understand how this rare mutation shapes CMML's clinical and morphological phenotype. CSF3R-mutated CMML emerges as a rare entity meeting the ICC/WHO diagnostic criteria for CMML and simultaneously showing clinical-pathological and molecular traits of CNL and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, rising an important and difficult diagnostic and therapeutical issue.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Leucemia Neutrofílica Crónica , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/patología , Leucemia Neutrofílica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Neutrofílica Crónica/genética , Mutación , Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/patología , Pronóstico , Receptores del Factor Estimulante de Colonias/genética
12.
Bull Cancer ; 110(11): 1106-1115, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453834

RESUMEN

In 2023, a diagnosis process of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is mainly based on morphological results obtained on bone marrow and blood smears which could be completed by cytogenetical analyses. Due to recent finding, flow cytometry data are recognized as useful for the diagnosis of CMML especially. Actual classifications and prognostic scoring systems have changed and nowadays include results of high-throughput sequencing approaches in addition to cytogenetical results. All together, these data allow the medical world to correctly evaluate the prognosis of these patients and to provide some information for targeted therapies. This chapter will provide the most important modifications recently published in the field of diagnosis and prognosis of MDS and CMML.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/genética , Médula Ósea , Pronóstico
14.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 24(8): 1036-1051, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300657

RESUMEN

OPINION STATEMENT: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematologic malignancy of mostly older individuals that exhibits both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. CMML presentation and outcome are variable, reflecting genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Hypomethylating agents are the mainstay of therapy but induce complete remissions in less than 20% of patients and do not prolong survival compared to hydroxyurea. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is potentially curative, but few patients qualify due to advanced age and/or comorbidities. Work of the past several years has identified key molecular pathways that drive disease proliferation and transformation to acute leukemia, including JAK/STAT and MAPK signaling and epigenetic dysregulation. There is increasingly compelling evidence that inflammation is a major driver of CMML progression. Thus far however, this mechanistic knowledge has not yet been translated into improved outcomes, suggesting that fundamentally new approaches are required. In this review, we discuss the disease course, new classifications, and current treatment landscape of CMML. We review ongoing clinical studies and discuss options for rationally based future clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Hidroxiurea/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre
18.
Br J Haematol ; 201(2): 302-307, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746431

RESUMEN

Leukaemic stem cell (LSC) gene expression has recently been linked to prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (17-gene LSC score, LSC-17) and myelodysplastic syndromes. Although chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is regarded as a stem cell disorder, the clinical and biological impact of LSCs on CMML patients remains elusive. Making use of multiple independent validation cohorts, we here describe a concise three-gene expression signature (LSC-3, derived from the LSC-17 score) as an independent and robust prognostic factor for leukaemia-free and overall survival in CMML. We propose that LSC-3 could be used to supplement existing risk stratification systems, to improve prognostic performance and guide management decisions.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Pronóstico , Células Madre
19.
Br J Haematol ; 200(5): 545-555, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36606610

RESUMEN

In this article, we describe three broad pathologic presentations of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) that may be encountered in clinical practice, in which an association between pDCs and myeloid neoplasms is identified: (1) myeloid neoplasms with mature pDC expansion, most commonly seen in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML); (2) myeloid neoplasms with pDC differentiation, in which pDCs show a spectrum of maturation from early immature pDCs to mature forms, most commonly seen in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML); (3) myeloid neoplasms associated with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), either stemming from the same precursor or representing an independent clonal process. Additionally, we also discuss AML with pDC-like phenotype, in which myeloblasts show immunophenotypic features that may mimic those seen in pDCs. Using these presentations, we provide a diagnostic algorithm for appropriate pathologic classification, while attempting to clarify and homogenize nomenclatures pertaining to different biologic states of pDCs.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/patología , Fenotipo , Diferenciación Celular , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/patología , Células Dendríticas/patología
20.
Am J Hematol ; 98(4): 681-689, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36601682

RESUMEN

DISEASE OVERVIEW: Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms, not otherwise specified (NOS), are MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms characterized by leukocytosis, in the absence of monocytosis and eosinophilia, with <20% blasts in the blood and bone marrow. DIAGNOSIS: aCML, previously known as aCML, BCR::ABL1 negative, was renamed as aCML by the ICC classification, and as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the 5th edition of the WHO classification. This entity is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia with immature myeloid cells comprising ≥10% of the white blood cell count, with prominent dysgranulopoiesis. MDS/MPN-NOS consists of MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms not meeting criteria for defined categories such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and aCML. MUTATIONS AND KARYOTYPE: Cytogenetic abnormalities are seen in 40-50% of patients in both categories. In aCML, somatic mutations commonly encountered include ASXL1, SETBP1, ETNK1, and EZH2 whereas MDS/MPN-NOS can be further stratified by mutational profiles into CMML-like, MDS/MPN-RS-T-like, aCML-like, TP35-mutated, and "others", respectively. RISK STRATIFICATION: The Mayo Clinic aCML model stratifies patients based on age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, and the presence of TET2 mutations into low-risk (0-1 points) and high-risk (>2 points) groups, with median survivals of 18 and 7 months, respectively. MDS/MPN-NOS patients have traditionally been risk stratified using MDS risk models such as IPSS and IPSS-R. TREATMENT: Leukocytosis and anemia are managed like lower risk MPN and MDS. DNMT inhibitors have been used in both entities with suboptimal response rates. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative strategy but is associated with high morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas , Trombocitosis , Humanos , Anciano , Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Crónica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/genética , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Leucocitosis , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas/genética , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas/terapia , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Trombocitosis/genética , Mutación , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA