Population pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal irinotecan and SN-38 in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal origin.

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with PM have a poor prognosis, and for those who are not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), palliative chemotherapy is currently the only option. Recently, we conducted a phase I trial (INTERACT) in which irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally (IP) to 18 patients ineligible for CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective was to evaluate covariates influencing the PK profile of irinotecan and SN-38 after IP administration. Secondly, a population PK model was developed to support the further development of IP irinotecan by improving dosing in patients with PM. Patients were treated with IP irinotecan every 2 weeks in combination with systemic FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Irinotecan and SN-38 were measured in plasma (588 samples) and SN-38 was measured in peritoneal fluid (267 samples). Concentration-Time data were log-transformed and analyzed using NONMEM version 7.5 using FOCE+I estimation. An additive error model described the residual error, with inter-individual variability in PK parameters modeled exponentially. The final structural model consisted of five compartments. Weight was identified as a covariate influencing the SN-38 plasma volume of distribution and GGT was found to influence the SN-38 plasma clearance. This population PK model adequately described the irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma after IP administration, with weight and GGT as predictive factors. Irinotecan is converted intraperitoneal to SN-38 by carboxylesterases and the plasma bioavailability of irinotecan is low. This model will be used for the further clinical development of IP irinotecan by providing dosing strategies.

Three-Period Bioequivalence Study of Sodium Levofolinate Injection With Calcium Levofolinate for Injection and Sodium Folinate for Injection in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

The aim of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and safety of test preparation sodium levofolinate injection with reference preparations of calcium levofolinate for injection and sodium folinate for injection in China. A single-center, randomized, open-label, 3-period, crossover test was conducted on 24 healthy subjects. Plasma concentration of levofolinate, dextrofolinate, and their metabolites l-5-methyltetrahydrofolate and d-5-methyltetrahydrofolate were quantified by a validated chiral-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. All adverse events (AEs) were documented to evaluate safety as they occurred and evaluated descriptively. Pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, terminal elimination half-life, and terminal rate constant) of 3 preparations were calculated. A total of 8 subjects (10 cases) of AEs occurred in this trial. No serious AEs or unexpected serious adverse reactions were observed. Sodium levofolinate was bioequivalent to calcium levofolinate and sodium folinate in Chinese subjects, and the 3 preparations were all well tolerated.

Effect of UGT1A1, CYP3A and CES Activities on the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and its Metabolites in Patients with UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is metabolized to an active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by carboxylesterase (CES). SN-38 is then converted to the inactive metabolite SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) by glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). Genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1 have been associated with altered SN-38 pharmacokinetics, which increase the risk of toxicity in patients. CPT-11 is also converted to 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC) and 7-ethyl-10-(4-amino-1-piperidino) carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), and this route also affects the plasma concentration of SN-38. We evaluated the activities of UGT1A1, CYP3A, and CES and the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of plasma SN-38 in patients with UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms. METHODS: Three male patients aged 56, 65, and 49 years were recruited for the analysis. All patients had pancreatic cancer, received FOLFIRINOX, and had UGT1A1*6/*6 (patients 1 and 3) or *6/*28 (patient 2) genetic polymorphisms. The rate constants for evaluating the enzyme activity were determined from the measured plasma concentration of CPT-11 and its metabolites using a two-compartment model by WinNonlin. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of SN-38 was patient 1 > patient 2 > patient 3. The rate constants obtained from the model analysis indicated the respective enzyme activities of UGT1A1 (k57), CYP3A (k13 + k19), and CES (k15). The order of values for UGT1A1 activity was patient 2 > patient 3 > patient 1. Since UGT1A1 activity was low in patient 1 with a high AUC of SN-38, it can be said that the increase in plasma concentration was due to a decrease in UGT1A1 activity. Conversely, the order of values for CYP3A and CES activities was patient 3 > patient 1 > patient 2 and patient 2 > patient 1 > patient 3, respectively. Patient 3 had the lowest AUC of SN-38, caused by a lower level of CES activity and increased CYP3A activity. CONCLUSION: In this study, we indicated that the plasma AUC of SN-38 and AUC ratio of SN-38G/SN-38 may depend on changes in the activities of CYP3A, CES, and UGT1A1. Using pharmacokinetic analysis, it is possible to directly evaluate enzyme activity and consider what kind of enzyme variation causes the increase in the AUC of SN-38.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin in a hemodialysis patient with advanced gastric cancer.

We administered FOLFOX (oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin) to an hemodialysis (HD) patient with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and investigated pharmacokinetics (PKs) and dialyzability of L-OHP. The patient was a 54-year-old Japanese man with a diagnosis of inoperable AGC. FOLFOX was instituted 3 h prior to the start of a 4 h HD period with the L-OHP and 5-FU doses reduced by 50% for the first cycle, and 30% reduced dose was administered for the second cycle. We performed an analysis of the PKs of L-OHP during these two cycles. Volume of distribution and area under the curve of the 30% reduced L-OHP dose were 56.7 L and 30.0 µg·h/mL, respectively. A dose reduction of L-OHP by 30%-50% may be advisable for the initial administration, given the need for careful administration of chemotherapy in HD patients, with particular attention to the development of hematological toxicities and neuropathy.

Ibudilast for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: a pilot study assessing preliminary efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: This prospective, open-label, sequential 'before vs. after' pilot study was conducted to provide preliminary efficacy and tolerability data for ibudilast in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity in patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal or colorectal cancer. Any potential impact of ibudilast on oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics was also explored. METHODS: Participants were administered a chemotherapy cycle (FOLFOX or CapeOx), followed by a chemotherapy cycle with co-administration of ibudilast 30 mg b.i.d. p.o. Efficacy was assessed on Day 3 and end of cycle using the Oxaliplatin-Specific Neurotoxicity Scale (OSNS) and additional clinical/patient-reported neurotoxicity measures. A population pharmacokinetic approach was used to determine oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics with and without ibudilast. RESULTS: Sixteen participants consented; 14 completed both chemotherapy cycles. Across all measures, the majority of participants experienced either an improvement or no worsening of neurotoxicity with ibudilast treatment. Based on OSNS assessments, acute neurotoxicity was unchanged in 12/14 participants and improved in 2/14 participants. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the dose-normalised ratio of oxaliplatin AUC (90% CI 95.0-109%) and 5-fluorouracil AUC (90% CI 66.5-173%) indicated no significant impact of ibudilast on systemic exposure. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicated ibudilast co-administration may improve or stabilise oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Given the expected worsening of symptoms in patients with continued chemotherapy, this represents a signal of effect that warrants further investigation. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicates ibudilast has no significant effect on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics, and is unlikely to influence pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: UTN U1111-1209-0075 and ANZCTRN12618000232235 (registered 13/02/2018).

Efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy on colorectal cancer patients: how much influence from the genetics?

We studied the predictive value for response and toxicity of functional polymorphisms in genes involved in the oxaliplatin/fluorouracil pathway in colorectal cancer patients. One hundred and twenty-seven (127) patients were treated with curative intended surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) regimen. The median age was 65.53 (27-80) years (66.9% male, 59.1% rectum). The median follow-up was 8.5 years (IQR, 4.1-9.4). At the end of follow-up, 59 patients (46.5%) had relapsed or died in the whole study population. We did find that XRCC1GG genotype is associated with a higher risk of developing haematologic toxicity. Furthermore, we report a significant association of the TS 3'UTR 6 bp/6 bp polymorphism and the XRCC1 rs25487 with a higher risk of developing anaemia and diarrhoea, respectively. On the other hand, none of the studied polymorphisms showed clinically relevant association with disease-free survival and overall survival or early failure to adjuvant FOLFOX therapy.

Regorafenib plus FOLFIRI with irinotecan dose escalated according to uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1genotyping in previous treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, and monoclonal antibodies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor. A dose reduction from 160 mg to 120 mg regorafenib reduces regorafenib-associated adverse events (AEs). Dose adjustment of irinotecan in a 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen on the basis of an individual uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genotype provides optimal oncological outcomes with acceptable AEs. The aim of this study is to address the efficacy and safety of a dose-adjusted combination of regorafenib and FOLFIRI for patients with mCRC. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized in a 2:1 ratio, controlled, clinical trial with two parallel arms will be conducted to compare irinotecan dose-escalated FOLFIRI according to UGT1A1 genotyping plus 120 mg regorafenib with 120 mg regorafenib alone in previously treated patients with mCRC. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, disease control rate, time to progression, and duration of treatment. Safety assessments will also be recorded. DISCUSSION: Dose adjustment for regorafenib and irinotecan makes treatment-related AEs tolerable and makes the concomitant treatment practicable. This study will provide initial evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of a new combination of chemotherapy and a targeted agent for mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880877. Prospectively registered on 19 March 2019.

[Simultaneous determination of leucovorin and 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate diastereoisomers in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with ultrafiltration centrifugation-based pretreatment and its application to a pharmacokinetic study].

A simple, sensitive, and stable high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of leucovorin and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate diastereomers in human plasma using methotrexate as the internal standard. The analytes and the internal standard were extracted from plasma samples by simple ultrafiltration centrifugation-based extraction. The separation was achieved on a chiral HSA column (150 mm×4 mm, 5 µm) using mobile phases containing 10 mmol pH 8.0 ammonium acetate and acetonitrile in gradient mode. The method showed good linearities in the ranges of 25-5000 µg/L and 12.5-3000 µg/L for leucovorin and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate diastereoisomers, respectively. The method was fully validated with respect to sensitivity, precision, accuracy, matrix effect, extraction recovery, and stability of analytes under various conditions. The method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of 125 mg/m2 6R,S-leucovorin and 62.5 mg/m2 6S-leucovorin. The results showed that the maximum observed concentrations (Cmax) of 6S-leucovorin and L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate were (3137.917±408.837) and (1679.633±244.132) µg/L, respectively, and the areas under the curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) were (7504.883±1185.101) and (14001.214±2868.949) µg/L in the 125 mg/m2 6R,S-leucovorin dose group. The Cmax values of 6S-leucovorin and L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate were (3187.917±387.298) and (1739.204±224.755) µg/L, respectively, and AUC0-t values were (7426.664±854.825) and (14884.331±1843.353) µg/L in the 62.5 mg/m2 6S-leucovorin dose group. There were no significant diffe-rences in the main pharmacokinetic parameters between the two dose groups, and the pharmacokinetic characteristics as well as the rate and extent of absorption were consistent. This method can provide technical support for future bioequivalence studies of sodium leucovorin.

First-in-human phase I study of infusional and bolus schedules of Deflexifol, a novel 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin formulation, after failure of standard treatment.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is administered with leucovorin (LV) to enhance clinical activity. However, simultaneous administration is not feasible due to their chemical incompatibility, so conditions for the maximum possible beneficial interaction cannot be met. To overcome this, we developed a novel all-in-one, pH neutral stable solution of 5-FU plus LV with ß-cyclodextrin (termed Deflexifol) and assessed its safety and tolerability in a first-in-human phase I trial. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancy received Deflexifol as weekly bolus (375-575 mg/m²) or two-weekly 46 h infusion (1200-3600 mg/m²) for six cycles in a 3+3 dose escalation design. Adverse events, pharmacokinetics and tumor response rates were assessed by standard methods. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated (19 bolus, 21 infusional, median age 67) with no grade 4 adverse events reported. Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 diarrhea and myelosuppression were reported for the bolus schedule at 575 mg/m2 (maximum tolerated dose 525 mg/m²), whereas none were reported for the infusional schedule. The recommended phase II infusional dose was declared as 3,000 mg/m², >25% that of 5-FU used in standard-of-care regimens. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed evidence of inter-patient variability, with no evidence of saturation in clearance, and a trend to linear increase in AUC with dose. Disease control rate was 64% despite most patients having failed previous 5-FU regimens. CONCLUSION: Deflexifol is safer and effective in bolus and infusion schedules at higher doses than that permitted by separate infusion of 5-FU and LV. A phase II study evaluating Deflexifol is planned.

Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a drug used against a wide range of tumor types. The individualized dosing of CPT-11 is essential to ensure optimal pharmacotherapy in cancer patients, given the wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of this drug and its active metabolite SN-38. Moreover, the reabsorption from SN-38-G to SN-38, by enterohepatic recirculation, is critical due to its influence in the treatment tolerance. The aim of this research was to build a joint population pharmacokinetic model for CPT-11 and its metabolites (SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38-G) that enabled an individualized posology adjustment. METHODS: We used data of 53 treatment cycles of FOLFIRINOX scheme corresponding to 20 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In order to build the population pharmacokinetic model, we implemented parametric and non-parametric methods using the Pmetrics library package for R. We also built multivariate regression models to predict the area under the curve and the maximum concentration using basal covariates. RESULTS: The final model was a multicompartmental model which represented the transformations from CPT-11 to its active metabolite SN-38 and from SN-38 to inactive SN-38-G. Besides, the model also represented the extensive elimination of SN-38-G and the reconversion of the remaining SN-38-G to SN-38 by enterohepatic recirculation. We carried out internal validation with 1000 simulations. The regression models predicted the PK parameters with R squared adjusted up to 0.9499. CONCLUSION: CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38-G can be correctly described by the multicompartmental model presented in this work. As far as we know, it is the first time that a joint model for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38-G that includes the process of reconversion from SN-38-G to SN-38 is characterized.

Population pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRINOX: a review of studies and parameters.

PURPOSE: FOLFIRINOX regimen is commonly used in colorectal and more recently pancreatic cancer. However, FOLFIRINOX induces significant and dose-limiting toxic effects leading to empirical dose reduction and sometimes treatment discontinuation. Model-based FOLFIRINOX regimen optimization might help improving patients' outcome. As a first step, the current review aims at bringing together all published population pharmacokinetics models for FOLFIRINOX anticancer drugs. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database from inception to February 2018, using the following terms: population pharmacokinetic(s), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, FOLFIRINOX. Only articles displaying nonlinear mixed effect models were included. Study description, pharmacokinetic parameter values and influential covariates are reported. For each model, the typical pharmacokinetic profile was simulated for the standard FOLFIRINOX protocol. RESULTS: The FOLFIRINOX compounds have been studied only separately so far. A total of six articles were retained for 5-fluorouracil, 6 for oxaliplatin and 5 for irinotecan (also including metabolites). Either one- or two-compartment models have been described for 5-fluorouracil, while two- or three-compartment models were reported for oxaliplatin and irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Non-linear elimination was sometimes reported for 5-fluorouracil. Sex and body size were found as influential covariates for all molecules in some publications. Despite some differences in model structures and parameter values, the simulated profiles and subsequent exposure were consistent between studies. CONCLUSIONS: The current review allows for a global understanding of FOLFIRINOX pharmacokinetics, and will provide a basis for further development of pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics-toxicity models for model-driven FOLFIRINOX protocol optimization to reach the best benefit-to-risk ratio.

A phase 1 dose-escalation study of veliparib with bimonthly FOLFIRI in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Veliparib is a potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. This phase 1 study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib combined with various FOLFIRI regimens in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: Patients received veliparib (10-270 mg BID, days 1-5, 15-19) and FOLFIRI (days 1-3, 15-17) in three regimens containing 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2: irinotecan 150 mg/m2 and folinic acid 400 mg/m2 (part 1); irinotecan 180 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus (part 2), or irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (part 3). The RP2D was further evaluated in safety expansion cohorts. Preliminary antitumour activity was also assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients received ≥1 veliparib dose. MTD was not reached; RP2D was set at 200 mg BID veliparib plus FOLFIRI (without 5-fluorouracil bolus). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.3%), diarrhoea, and nausea (60.9% each). Dose-limiting toxicities (n = 4) were grade 3 gastritis and grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Veliparib exposure was dose-proportional, with no effects on the pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRI components. Fifteen patients had a partial response (objective response rate, 17.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The acceptable safety profile and preliminary antitumour activity of veliparib plus FOLFIRI support further evaluation of this combination.

Phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Regimen of 1 week on, 1 week off.

A phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin (LV) given in a 4-week schedule (2 weeks' administration followed by 2 weeks' rest) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed that the combination was effective, but grade 3 toxicities (diarrhea, stomatitis and anorexia) occurred at a relatively high rate. In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV. Patients with mCRC received oral S-1 (40-60 mg) and LV (25 mg) twice daily for 1 week, followed by 1 week's rest. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 and LV in Chinese patients were evaluated on day 1 of the first cycle. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in Japan and China. Of 71 eligible patients, the response rate was 53.5%, and the disease control rate was 83.1%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.5 and 24.3 months, respectively. The incidences of grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 8.3%, stomatitis 8.3%, anorexia 2.8% and neutropenia 9.7%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The pharmacokinetics profiles of S-1 plus LV in Chinese patients were similar to those in Japanese patients. This 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV showed good efficacy and better tolerability than the 4-week schedule. This therapy will be the base regimen for mCRC to be added by other cytotoxic or molecular-targeted drugs. The optimized treatment schedule for S-1 plus LV was 1 week on and 1 week off.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of afilbercept with FOLFIRI: comparison of Chinese and Caucasian populations.

Background This study assessed the preliminary safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor effects of aflibercept in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Chinese patients with previously-treated advanced solid malignancies. Patients and Methods This open-label single-arm Phase I study conducted at two centers in China included adult (≥18 years) patients with metastatic or unresectable solid malignancies who had received ≥1 prior treatment. Patients received aflibercept 4 mg/kg IV on Day 1 followed by FOLFIRI over Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks, and were assessed for safety, tumor response, PK parameters and immunogenicity. Post-hoc analyses included calculation of progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (35%), hypertension (30%), stomatitis (20%) and proteinuria (20%), and no anti-aflibercept antibodies were detected. Six patients achieved a partial response, and in 15 patients with CRC median PFS was 5.95 months (95% CI: 5.29-8.77). Free aflibercept remained in excess of VEGF-bound aflibercept for the majority of the study treatment duration. The mean free aflibercept values for Cmax (64.8 µg/mL) AUC (291 µg.day/mL), CL (0.92 L/day) and Vss (5.9 L) were similar to those measured in Caucasian patients. The addition of aflibercept did not influence the PK of the chemotherapy agents. Conclusion For Chinese patients with pre-treated advanced solid malignancies, 4 mg/kg of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI was well-tolerated, demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity and had a PK profile consistent with that in Caucasian patients.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 plus oral leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: S-1 has shown a response rate of 35% in chemonaïve patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Leucovorin enhances the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil, and concurrent oral administration of S-1 and leucovorin may represent a more active treatment option for mCRC. METHODS: S-1 (35 mg/m2) and leucovorin (25 mg/body) were orally administered twice daily to chemonaïve patients with mCRC. Predefined dose (schedule)-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first course and treatment continuity during the first two courses were evaluated during three periods of treatment with S-1 plus leucovorin (level 0, 2 weeks; level 1, 3 weeks; and level 2, 4 weeks), each followed by a 2-week rest. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of S-1 and leucovorin were studied on days 1 and 14 of the first course. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. All three patients had DLTs at level 2, and this level was considered the maximum tolerated schedule. Level 0 was designated as the recommended schedule based on the incidences of DLTs and treatment continuity. The main toxic effects were gastrointestinal, such as diarrhea and stomatitis. There was no grade 4 adverse event or treatment-related death. The overall response rate was 67% (95% confidence interval, 38-88%). The PK profiles of S-1 plus leucovorin were similar to those in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended schedule was 2 weeks of S-1 plus leucovorin followed by a 2-week rest. The increased response and gastrointestinal toxicities of S-1 plus leucovorin as compared with S-1 monotherapy suggest that co-administration of leucovorin enhanced the activity of S-1.

A phase I dose-escalation study of PEP02 (irinotecan liposome injection) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: PEP02 (also known as MM-398, nal-IRI) is a novel nanoparticle formulation of irinotecan encapsulated in liposomes. The aims of this study were to investigate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PEP02 in combination with 5-FU and LV, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in cohorts to receive PEP02 from 60 to 120 mg/m2 (dose expressed as the irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate salt) as a 90-min intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 and LV 200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were assigned to four dose levels, 60 (three patients), 80 (six patients), 100 (five patients) and 120 mg/m2 (two patients). DLT was observed in four patients, two at the 100 mg/m2 dose level (one had grade III infection with hypotension and grade III hemorrhage; the other had grade III diarrhea and grade IV neutropenia), and two at the 120 mg/m2 dose level (one had grade III diarrhea and grade IV neutropenia; the other had grade III diarrhea). The MTD of PEP02 was determined as 80 mg/m2. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (81%), diarrhea (75%) and vomiting (69%). Among the six patients who received the MTD, one patient exhibited partial response, four patients had stable disease and one showed progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic data showed that PEP02 had a lower peak plasma concentration, longer half-life, and increased area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to time t of SN-38 than irinotecan at similar dose level. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of PEP02 on day 1 in combination with 24-h infusion of 5-FU and LV on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks was 80 mg/m2, which will be the recommended dose for future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered ( NCT02884128 ) with date of registration: August 12, 2016.

Iontophoretic device delivery for the localized treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Poor delivery and systemic toxicity of many cytotoxic agents, such as the recent promising combination chemotherapy regimen of folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), restrict their full utility in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Local delivery of chemotherapies has become possible using iontophoretic devices that are implanted directly onto pancreatic tumors. We have fabricated implantable iontophoretic devices and tested the local iontophoretic delivery of FOLFIRINOX for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft model. Iontophoretic delivery of FOLFIRINOX was found to increase tumor exposure by almost an order of magnitude compared with i.v. delivery with substantially lower plasma concentrations. Mice treated for 7 wk with device FOLFIRINOX experienced significantly greater tumor growth inhibition compared with i.v. FOLFIRINOX. A marker of cell proliferation, Ki-67, was stained, showing a significant reduction in tumor cell proliferation. These data capitalize on the unique ability of an implantable iontophoretic device to deliver much higher concentrations of drug to the tumor compared with i.v. delivery. Local iontophoretic delivery of cytotoxic agents should be considered for the treatment of patients with unresectable nonmetastatic disease and for patients with the need for palliation of local symptoms, and may be considered as a neoadjuvant approach to improve resection rates and outcome in patients with localized and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Phase I study of FOLFIRI plus pimasertib as second-line treatment for KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been implicated in the molecular pathogenesis of human cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This provides a rationale for the development of MAPK-targeted agents such as pimasertib. METHODS: Patients with KRAS mutant mCRC were treated in the second-line setting with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/irinotecan) plus pimasertib. The primary objective of the safety run-in phase was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose of pimasertib combined with FOLFIRI. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in the trial. Ten and six patients were treated daily with 45 and 60 mg of pimasertib plus FOLFIRI, respectively. The MTD was considered to be 45 mg per day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia and skin/rash event. Of the 15 patients in the efficacy analysis group, two patients had partial response, nine patients had stable disease, three patients had progressive disease as their best overall response and one patient could not be evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation of pimasertib in combination with FOLFIRI was limited by toxicity. At the MTD of 45 mg per day, pimasertib was adequately tolerated in patients with mCRC and no unexpected or new safety signals or concerns were identified.

Folate is absorbed across the human colon: evidence by using enteric-coated caplets containing 13C-labeled [6S]-5-formyltetrahydrofolate.

BACKGROUND: Folate intakes that do not meet or greatly exceed requirements may be associated with negative health outcomes. A better understanding of contributors that influence the input side will help establish dietary guidance that ensures health benefits without associated risks. Colonic microbiota produce large quantities of folate, and [(13)C5]5-formyltetrahydrofolate infused during colonoscopy is absorbed. However, it is unclear if significant quantities of folate are absorbed in an intact microbiome. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether and how much of a physiologic dose of [(13)C5]5-formyltetrahydrofolate delivered in a pH-sensitive enteric caplet to an intact colonic microbiome is absorbed. DESIGN: Healthy adults ingested a specially designed pH-sensitive acrylic copolymer-coated barium sulfate caplet that contained 855 nmol (400 µg) [(13)C5]5-formyltetrahydrofolate. After a washout period ≥ 4 wk, subjects received an intravenous injection of the same compound (214 nmol). Serially collected blood samples before and after each test dose were analyzed by using a microbiological assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Caplet disintegration in the colon was observed by fluoroscopic imaging for 6 subjects with a mean (± SD) complete disintegration time of 284 ± 155 min. The mean (± SEM) rate of appearance of [(13)C5]5-methyltetrahydrofolate in plasma was 0.33 ± 0.09 (caplet) and 5.8 ± 1.2 (intravenous) nmol/h. Likely because of the significant time in the colon, the mean apparent absorption across the colon was 46%. CONCLUSIONS: Folate is absorbed across the colon in humans with an undisturbed microbiome. This finding and previous observations of the size of the colonic depot of folate and its potential for manipulation by diet (eg, dietary fiber, oligosaccharides, and probiotics) suggest that an individual's dietary folate requirement may differ depending on the consumption of dietary constituents that affect the size and composition of their gastrointestinal microbiota. In addition, a systematic investigation of the role of colonic folate on gastrointestinal development and the prevention of colorectal cancer is warranted. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00941174.

FOLFIRI and sunitinib as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases--a CESAR phase II study including pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and imaging data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, clinical outcome, and imaging parameters in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFIRI plus sunitinib. METHODS: mCRC patients with liver metastases were treated with FOLFIRI and sunitinib as 1st line therapy. At protocol-defined time points, multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)measurements, computed tomography (CT) scans, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarker analyses were performed during the first and second treatment cycle. Thereafter, patients were treated until tumor progression, investigator’s decision due to toxicity, or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: 28 patients were screened, 26 were included, and 23 received at least one study medication. Full safety analysis was performed in 23 patients. Full PK and biomarker analyses were performed in 21 patients. Strong responses in tumor size reduction forced a change from the original imaging timing scheme. This unforeseen change in the timing scheme resulted in subgroups too small for meaningful statistical analysis of most imaging parameters. Thus, only a descriptive analysis of the MRI data was possible. In 21/22 patients, MRI showeda decrease of the liver metastases. Best response was partial remission (PR) in 8/17 patients. Plasma concentrations of sVEGFR-2 and sVEGFR-3 decreased in all patients. The majority of the patients developed some kind of toxicity not always deducible to FOLFIRI or sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the observed side effect profile, FOLFIRI plus sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cannot be recommended for previously untreated mCRC.