Posterior tibial slope is a modifiable predictor of relatively large extension gaps in total knee arthroplasty for degenerative osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: During total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis, the sagittal gap imbalance (SGI) with a relatively large extension gap is an important surgical challenge. We determined the predictors of SGI with a relatively large extension gap and evaluated the surgical outcomes of knees with SGI. METHODS: 551 consecutive cases of primary TKA for osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the SGI and statistically matched according to baseline characteristics via the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the predictors of sagittal gap difference (SGD) and SGI. Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all the knees included, 8.5% (n = 45) presented with SGI with a relatively large extension gap and required femoral sagittal balancing to manage SGI. The hyperextension angle (HA), preoperative joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and the change in posterior tibial slope (PTS) significantly correlated to SGD and predicted SGI with a relatively large extension gap. SGI group showed significant changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and joint line height compared to those without SGI (1.48 vs -0.45, 1.37 vs -0.51, respectively). Postoperative ROM and knee society knee scores were lower in SGI group. CONCLUSION: Knees requiring sagittal balancing to manage SGI with a relatively large extension gap is not uncommon in TKA for osteoarthritic knees. The change in PTS is an independent and modifiable predictor of SGI.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are often encountered in the setting of other knee pathology and sometimes in isolation. A thorough understanding of the native PCL anatomy is crucial in the successful treatment of these injuries. The PCL consists of two independent bundles that function in a codominant relationship to perform the primary role of resisting posterior tibial translation relative to the femur. A secondary role of the PCL is to provide rotatory stability. The anterolateral (AL) bundle has a more vertical orientation when compared with the posteromedial (PM) bundle. The AL bundle has a more anterior origin than the PM bundle on the lateral wall of the medial femoral condyle. The tibial insertion of AL bundle on the PCL facet is medial and anterior to the PM bundle. The AL and PM bundles are 12-mm apart at the center of the femoral origins, while the tibial insertions are more tightly grouped. The different spatial orientation of the two bundles and large distance between the femoral centers is responsible for the codominance of the PCL bundles. The AL bundle is the dominant restraint to posterior tibial translation throughout midrange flexion, while the PM bundle is the primary restraint in extension and deep flexion. Biomechanical testing has shown independent reconstruction of the two bundles that better reproduces native knee biomechanics, while significant differences in clinical outcomes remain to be seen. Stress X-rays may play an important role in clinical decision-making process for operative versus nonoperative management of isolated PCL injuries. Strong understanding of PCL anatomy and biomechanics can aid surgical management.

Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

The optimal surgical technique for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a topic of debate among knee surgeons. There are many variables to consider including graft selection, graft fixation method, and single- versus double-bundle reconstruction. While there is a need for ongoing research to elucidate which technique yields the best results, this article discusses recent literature on the topic of single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction as well as the senior author's preferred reconstruction method.

Biomechanics of the posterior oblique ligament of the knee.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic literature review is to analyse the isolated biomechanics of the posterior oblique ligament of the knee. In the current literature, the biomechanical aspect of the posterior oblique ligament was analysed in several articles, but this was always done in association with other capsuloligamentous structures. METHODS: A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to identify all studies dealing with the biomechanics of the posterior oblique ligament. Two independent investigators performed the research using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases. FINDINGS: A total of 10 articles analysed the biomechanics of the posterior oblique ligament, confirming the importance of this ligament for the stability of the knee in different positions. The posterior oblique ligament is the main stabiliser against internal rotation in early flexion angles (0°-30°) and it is an important restraint to posterior tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Furthermore, the posterior oblique ligament bears up to 47% of the force borne by the anterior cruciate ligament in resisting the internal rotation loads when a pivot-shift maneuver is simulated. INTERPRETATION: This review confirms that the posterior oblique ligament is an anatomically well-defined and distinct structure that plays a key role in stabilising the knee, especially in internal rotation. The posterior oblique ligament is frequently injured along with other anatomical structures. Future studies should develop clinical tests to evaluate the functionality and stability of the the posterior oblique ligament.

Knee Ligament Anatomy and Biomechanics.

An understanding of knee ligament anatomy and biomechanics is foundational for physicians treating knee injuries, especially the more rare and morbid multiligamentous knee injuries. This chapter examines the roles that the cruciate and collateral anatomy and morphology play in their kinematics. Additionally, the biomechanics of the ACL, PCL, MCL, and LCL are discussed as they have surgical and reconstructive implications.

Graft bending angle of the reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament gradually decreases as knee flexion increases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the change in the graft bending angles at the femoral and tibial tunnel aperture in single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. It was hypothesized that different knee flexion and different tunnel directions may affect changes of the femoral and tibial graft bending angle. METHODS: The right knees of 12 male subjects were scanned with a high-resolution computed tomography scanner at 4 different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°). To begin with, the 3D knee models were created and manipulated with the use of several modeling programs. Single-bundle PCL reconstruction was then virtually conducted in a 90° flexion model: The femoral and tibial graft bending angle, according to the various knee flexion angles, was calculated using a special software program. RESULTS: The femoral graft bending angle significantly decreased as the knee flexion increased between 0° and 135° (all p < 0.001). The femoral graft bending angle of the AL graft showed the most obtuse angles among the three types of the graft beyond 45° of knee flexion. For the tibial graft bending angle, the anteromedial tunnel group showed significantly more acute tibial graft bending angle than the anterolateral tunnel group in all three types of the graft at all flexion angles (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in the femoral graft bending angle were generally affected by different knee flexion angles. The effect of tibial tunnel direction on the tibial graft bending angle was found to be significant. The clinical relevance is that a mostly obtuse femoral graft bending angle was shown by the AL graft among three types of the graft.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Their Surgical Implications.

Knowledge and understanding of the complex anatomy and biomechanical function of the native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is vitally important when evaluating PCL injury and possible reconstruction. The PCL has important relationships with the anterior cruciate ligament, menisci, tibial spines, ligament of Humphrey, ligament of Wrisberg, and the posterior neurovascular structures. Through various experimental designs, the biomechanical role of the PCL has been elucidated. The PCL has its most well-defined role as a primary restraint/stabilizer to posterior stress and it seems this role is greatest at higher degrees of knee flexion. The natural history of high-grade deficiency leads to increased contact pressures and degeneration of both the medial and patellofemoral compartments. There is still considerable debate regarding whether high-level athletes can return to sport at the same level with conservative treatment of a high-grade PCL tear, and whether greater laxity in the knee correlates with decreased subjective and objective outcomes. Poor surgical outcomes after PCL reconstruction have been attributed to many factors, the most common of which include: additional intra-articular pathology, poor fixation methods, insufficient knowledge of PCL anatomy, improper tunnel placement, and poor surgical candidates.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has led to the evolution and improvement of anatomic-based reconstructions. The PCL is composed of the larger anterolateral bundle (ALB) and the smaller posteromedial bundle (PMB). On the femoral side, the ALB spans from the trochlear point to the medial arch point on the roof of the notch, while the PMB occupies the medial wall from the medial arch point to the most posterior aspect of the articular cartilage. Because of these broad and distinct attachments, the bundles have a load-sharing, synergistic and codominant relationship. Both restrict posterior translation; however, the ALB has a proportionally larger role in restricting translation throughout flexion, whereas the PMB has a role comparable to that of the ALB in full extension. In addition, the PMB resists internal rotational at greater flexion angles (> 90°). Consequently, it is difficult to restore native kinematics with a single graft. Biomechanical analysis of single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstructions (SB PCLR vs DB PCLR) demonstrates improved restoration of native kinematics with a DB PCLR, including resistance to posterior translation throughout flexion (15°-120°) and internal rotation in deeper flexion (90°-120°). Similarly, clinical research demonstrates excellent outcomes following DB PCLR, including functional outcomes comparable to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, with no significant differences between isolated and multiligament PCL injuries. Compared to SB PCLR, systematic review has demonstrated the superiority of DB PCLR based on objective postoperative stress radiography and International Knee Documentation Committee scores in randomized trials. In addition to reconstruction techniques, recent research has identified other factors that impact kinematics and PCL forces, including decreased tibial slope, which leads to increased graft stresses, and incidence of native PCL injuries. As the understanding of these other contributing factors evolves, so will surgical and treatment algorithms that will further improve patients' outcomes.

Intraoperative posterior movement of the tibia at 90° of flexion predicts worse postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between intraoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior changes at 90° of flexion and postoperative maximum flexion angles in navigated cruciate-substituting TKA. The hypothesis of this study was that intraoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior changes at 90° of flexion indirectly reflect posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and associate with postoperative maximum flexion angles. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis treated with primary TKA were retrospectively analysed. All patients received the same type of implant, placed with an image-free navigation system. The PCL was retained, and cruciate-substituting inserts were used in all cases. The mean follow-up was 44 ± 8 months. The preoperative and postoperative kinematics were measured intraoperatively with a navigation system, and the preoperative and postoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior positions at 90° of flexion were determined. The correlation between intraoperative anteroposterior position changes and postoperative maximum flexion angles was investigated. The correlation between the change of anteroposterior position and tibiofemoral rotational angles was also assessed. RESULTS: The intraoperative anteroposterior position change was -1.7 ± 3.4 mm (a positive value indicates tibial posterior shift). Flexion angle improvement was negatively correlated with intraoperative change of tibiofemoral anteroposterior position (R2 = 0.17, p < 0.005). Postoperative maximum flexion angles were also negatively correlated with intraoperative change of tibiofemoral anteroposterior position (R2 = 0.09, p < 0.05). The postoperative amount of tibial internal rotation was positively correlated with the preoperative amount (R2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001); however, the intraoperative anteroposterior position change was not correlated with the postoperative amount of tibial internal rotation (n.s.). CONCLUSION: A navigation system may be able to indirectly evaluate PCL function and predict the postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting TKA. Intraoperative posterior movement of the tibia at 90° of flexion predicts worse postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective comparative study.

In vivo kinematics and ligamentous function of the knee during weight-bearing flexion: an investigation on mid-range flexion of the knee.

PURPOSE: To investigate the in vivo femoral condyle motion and synergistic function of the ACL/PCL along the weight-bearing knee flexion. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy human knees were imaged using a combined MRI and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique during a single-legged lunge (0°-120°). The medial and lateral femoral condyle translation and rotation (measured using geometric center axis-GCA), and the length changes of the ACL/PCL were analyzed at: low (0°-30°), mid-range (30°-90°) and high (90°-120°) flexion of the knee. RESULTS: At low flexion (0°-30°), the strains of the ACL and the posterior-medial bundle of the PCL decreased. The medial condyle showed anterior translation and lateral condyle posterior translation, accompanied with a sharp increase in external GCA rotation (internal tibial rotation). As the knee continued flexion in mid-range (30°-90°), both ACL and PCL were slack (with negative strain values). The medial condyle moved anteriorly before 60° of flexion and then posteriorly, accompanied with a slow increase of GCA rotation. As the knee flexed in high flexion (90°-120°), only the PCL had increasingly strains. Both medial and lateral condyles moved posteriorly with a rather constant GCA rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The ACL and PCL were shown to play a reciprocal and synergistic role during knee flexion. Mid-range reciprocal anterior-posterior femoral translation or laxity corresponds to minimal constraints of the ACL and PCL, and may represent a natural motion character of normal knees. The data could be used as a valuable reference when managing the mid-range "instability" and enhancing high flexion capability of the knee after TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Elongation Patterns of the Anterior and Posterior Borders of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee.

PURPOSE: To compare the elongation patterns of the anterior and posterior borders of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) at varying knee flexion angles with the knee in a neutral position without any external forces and with external forces applied, including anterior-posterior translation, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus angulation. METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees were tested in a custom knee testing system. Elongation of the anterior and posterior borders of the ALL was measured using a MicroScribe 3DLX system at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° and after the application of internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation. RESULTS: The anterior border showed a slight noncontinuous increase in percentage elongation (0.8% ± 2.2%) whereas the posterior border showed a continuous decrease in percentage elongation (-12.0% ± 2.8%) as knee flexion increased (P < .001). Apart from the elongation of the posterior border at 90° of knee flexion, internal rotation, varus angulation, and anterior translation resulted in a significant increase in the percentage elongation of the anterior and posterior borders at each flexion angle compared with external rotation, valgus angulation, and posterior translation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL shows different elongation patterns between the anterior and posterior borders, with a continuous decrease in the percentage elongation of the posterior border as knee flexion increases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study presents useful evidence to resolve the uncertainty regarding the change in length of the ALL at various degrees of knee flexion. This information may be helpful for deciding the optimal knee flexion angle during ALL graft fixation. The findings from this study suggest that graft fixation during ALL reconstructions should be performed at close to full extension of the knee.

Condylar-Stabilized TKR May Not Fully Compensate for PCL-Deficiency: An In Vitro Cadaver Study.

Increased-congruency bearing options are widely available in numerous total knee replacement (TKR) systems, with the intended purpose of compensating for posterior-cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency. However, their ability to provide adequate stability in this setting has been debated. This in vitro joint simulator study measured changes in knee joint kinematics and stability during passive flexion-extension motions and simulated activities of daily living resulting from TKR with condylar-stabilized (CS) TKR without a PCL versus cruciate-retaining (CR) TKR. During passive flexion, the CS TKR resulted in a more posterior tibial positioning than both the intact joint and CR TKR (by 3.4 ± 1.0 mm and 4.8 ± 0.7 mm, respectively). With a posterior tibial force applied, the CS TKR tibia was again significantly more posterior than that of the intact joint and CR TKR (by 4.7 ± 1.3 mm and 5.6 ± 0.8 mm, respectively). Furthermore, there were significant differences in the anterior/posterior kinematics of both TKR with respect to intact knees during gait, and differences between the CS and CR TKR during stair ascent and descent. Overall, there appears to be a reduction in anterior-posterior stability of the PCL-deficient CS TKR knee, suggesting that contemporary increased-congruency bearing surface designs may not adequately compensate for the loss of the PCL. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2172-2181, 2019.

Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Restore Native Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics During Gait.

Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design preserves both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to restore normal posterior femoral rollback and joint kinematics. Abnormal knee kinematics and "paradoxical" anterior femoral translation in conventional TKA designs have been suggested as potential causes of patient dissatisfaction. However, there is a paucity of data on the in vivo kinematics and articular contact behavior of BCR-TKA. This study aimed to investigate in vivo kinematics, articular contact position, and pivot point location of the BCR-TKA during gait. In vivo kinematics of 30 patients with unilateral BCR-TKA during treadmill walking was determined using validated dual fluoroscopic imaging tracking technique. The BCR-TKA exhibited less extension than the normal healthy knee between heel strike and 48% of gait cycle. Although the average external rotation trend observed for BCR TKA was similar to the normal healthy knee, the range of motion was not fully comparable. The lowest point of the medial condyle showed longer anteroposterior translation excursion than the lateral condyle, leading to a lateral-pivoting pattern in 60% of BCR TKA patients during stance phase. BCR-TKA demonstrated no statistical significant differences in anterior-posterior translation as well as varus rotation, when compared to normal healthy knees during the stance phase. However, sagittal plane motion and tibiofemoral articular contact characteristics including pivoting patterns were not fully restored in BCR TKA patients during gait, suggesting that BCR TKA does not restore native tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1929-1937, 2019.

Biomechanical evaluation of the influence of posterolateral corner structures on cruciate ligaments forces during simulated gait and squatting.

Posterolateral corner (PLC) structures of the knee joint comprise complex anatomical soft tissues that support static and dynamic functional movements of the knee. Most previous studies analyzed posterolateral stability in vitro under static loading conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the contributions of the lateral (fibular) collateral ligament (LCL), popliteofibular ligament (PFL), and popliteus tendon (PT) to cruciate ligament forces under simulated dynamic loading conditions by using selective individual resection. We combined medical imaging and motion capture of healthy subjects (four males and one female) to develop subject-specific knee models that simulated the 12 degrees of freedom of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint behaviors. These computational models were validated by comparing electromyographic (EMG) data with muscle activation data and were based on previous experimental studies. A rigid multi-body dynamics simulation using a lower extremity musculoskeletal model was performed to incorporate intact and selective resection of ligaments, based on a novel force-dependent kinematics method, during gait (walking) and squatting. Deficiency of the PLC structures resulted in increased loading on the posterior cruciate ligament and anterior cruciate ligament. Among PLC structures, the PT is the most influential on cruciate ligament forces under dynamic loading conditions.

Minimum 10-Year Results of Single- Versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical, Radiologic, and Survivorship Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies have shown that double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) is better than single-bundle (SB) PCLR in restoring normal biomechanical function and stability. However, most clinical studies report no differences between the technical methods, and there is yet no long-term clinical comparative study. HYPOTHESIS: DB PCLR would show superior results and survivorship outcomes to those of SB PCLR in long-term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 64 patients who underwent primary PCLR between 2000 and 2008 and were followed up for a minimum of 10 years: 28 patients underwent SB PCLR (mean ± SD: age, 29.1 ± 12.2 years), and 36 underwent DB PCLR (age, 27.0 ± 9.2 years). Clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score), side-to-side difference in stress radiographs, osteoarthritis progression, and survival rate were compared between the SB and DB groups at the last follow-up. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, all clinical scores showed no significant differences between the SB and DB groups. The mean side-to-side difference in stress radiographs (SB, 5.3 ± 3.5 mm; DB, 5.0 ± 3.8 mm; P = .828) and osteoarthritis progression (SB, 14.3%; DB, 13.9%; P = .964) were not different between the groups. The 15-year survival rate was 82.1% for SB PCLR and 83.7% for DB PCLR. CONCLUSION: Both the SB and DB techniques for PCLR showed satisfactory long-term clinical results and survivorship outcomes. There were no significant differences between SB and DB PCLR in clinical, radiologic, and survivorship outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: DB PCLR did not show superior clinical results to those of SB PCLR in the long-term follow-up. These results should be considered in the surgical planning for PCLR.

In vivo anterior cruciate ligament length pattern assessment secondary to differences in the femoral attachment under loading condition using image-matching techniques.

BACKGROUND: The anterior cruciate ligament is composed of two functional bundles and is crucial for knee function. There is limited understanding of the role of each individual bundle and the influence on length pattern due to difference in bone tunnel position under loading conditions throughout the range of motion. We measured point to point length between the femoral and tibial footprints of the ligament throughout the range of motion in normal knees, under normal loading conditions, and investigated length pattern changes secondary to differences in the femoral footprint. We hypothesized that anteromedial and posterolateral bundles have complementary roles, and the ligament length pattern is influenced by the footprint position. METHODS: We studied the squat movements of six healthy knees and measured point to point footprint distance. The footprint distances were measured after changing them to be 10% lower, 10% shallower, and both 10% lower and shallower than the defined anatomical femoral footprint. RESULTS: Average length changes of 12.0 and 14.1 mm from maximum extension (10°) to deep flexion (150°) were observed when the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles were defined by the default anatomical position. Maximum and minimum length were reached during full extension and flexion for both the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles, respectively. At 10% lower, length increased 2.2 mm over the default value in both the anteromedial and posterolateral lengths. At 10% shallower, decreases of 4.1 mm and 3.9 mm were observed compared with the default anteromedial and posterolateral lengths, respectively. In the 10% lower and 10% shallower position, anteromedial and posterolateral lengths decreased 2.1 mm and 1.9 mm compared with the default value, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The anteromedial and posterolateral bundles have a complementary role. Femoral footprint position defined in the lower direction leads to stronger tension during extension, while the higher and shallower direction leads to isometry during flexion, and the deeper direction leads to laxity during flexion. The target bone tunnel position is that the anteromedial bundle should not to be too low and too deep to maintain function of bundle with less change in length. In addition, the posterolateral bundle should be somewhat lower and/or deeper than the anteromedial, with the expectation that it will function to induce stronger tension at the extended position. However, we should avoid lower position when we cannot prepare a sufficient diameter of reconstructed bundle to avoid re-injury due to excessive tension.

Computational analysis of customized cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restoration of native knee joint biomechanics.

The purpose of this study was to verify if customized prosthesis better preserves the native knee joint kinematics and provides lower contact stress on the polyethylene (PE) insert owing to the wider bone preservation than that of standard off-the-shelf prosthesis in posterior cruciate-retaining type total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Validated finite element (FE) models for were developed to evaluate the knee joint kinematics and contact stress on the PE insert after TKA with customized and standard off-the-shelf (OTS) prostheses as well as in normal healthy knee through FE analysis under dynamic loading conditions. The contact stresses on the customized prosthesis decreased by 18% and 8% under gait cycle loading conditions, and 24% and 9% under deep-knee-bend loading conditions, in the medial and lateral sides of the PE insert, respectively, compared with the standard OTS prosthesis. The anterior-posterior translation and internal-external (IE) rotation in customized TKA were more similar to native knee joint behaviors compared with standard OTS TKA under gait loading conditions. The difference from normal knee kinematics was lower for femoral rollback and IE rotation in customized TKA than in standard OTS TKA in the deep-knee-bend condition. In general, customized prostheses achieve kinematics that are close to those of the native healthy knee joint and have better contact stresses than standard OTS prostheses in gait and deep-knee-bend loading conditions.

In-vivo elongation of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL and PCL) sacrifice in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been considered a potential factor leading to abnormal knee kinematics. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA design allows retention of both ACL and PCL. However, there is a limited data on the ACL/PCL in-vivo elongation characteristics of BCR TKA. The study aimed to evaluate and compare the in-vivo elongation patterns of ACL/PCL between BCR TKA and contralateral non-implanted knee and to explore potential factors leading to the changed elongation patterns between limbs. ACL/PCL elongations of both knees during sit-to-stand were measured in 29 unilateral BCR TKA patients using a validated dual fluoroscopic tracking technique. Joint gap changes of the BCR TKA knees relative to the contralateral knee were quantified. BCR TKA and the contralateral non-implanted knee exhibited similar ACL elongation at extension and clinical anterior knee laxity. However, BCR TKA showed significantly greater PCL elongation during flexion than the non-implanted knee. Variation of changed elongation was observed for both ACL and PCL, suggesting a heterogeneous restoration of normal ACL/PCL functions. A significant correlation was found between extension joint gap change and the change of ACL elongation, highlighting the importance of precise joint line restoration and soft tissue balancing during BCR TKA surgery. Our findings suggest that BCR TKA did not fully restore "near-normal" cruciate ligament elongation patterns and anteroposterior stability. Considerable heterogeneity remains in the retained ligament elongation patterns and warrants further investigations of multifactorial factors to optimize ACL/PCL functions in BCR TKA. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3239-3246, 2018.

[Choice of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate ligament preserved or not].

Total knee arthroplasty is an effective method for the treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthrosis, which can effectively relieve joint pain and reconstruct the integrity of the joint. Whether the posterior cruciate ligament should be preserved during surgery or not, which is still in dispute. In recent years, posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee prostheses are both applied in clinical practice. Both domestic and international studies have shown that there are no significant difference in patient satisfaction, knee flexion, survival rate of the prosthesis and the main clinical manifestations between two prostheses. However, posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis is more consistent with the normal physiology and biomechanics of the human body. The gait is more balanced and proprioceptive when walking up and down the stairs, but when the joints are buckling, the femur is abnormal to move back to the tibia, resulting in abnormal motion. While posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis can correct severe deformity of the knee, and keep better balance between flexion and extension of the knee joint, but there is a potential complication of patellar clunk syndrome. Therefore, under the same conditions, the younger patients may prefer to chose posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis, while elder patients may prefer to chose posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis. This paper reviews the function of posterior cruciate ligament, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of two prostheses, so as to provide some references for clinic.

A Computer Model of Mid-Flexion Instability in a Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Some patients have mid-flexion instability despite stability at 0° and 90° of flexion. This study aims to determine the effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) stability while changing femur implant size and position. METHODS: A computational analysis was performed simulating knee flexion of posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) TKA designs. Deviations from the ideal TKA implant position were simulated by adjusting tibiofemoral proximal-distal position and femur anterior-posterior position as well as implant size. Forces in ligaments connecting the femur and tibia were collected. Total tibiofemoral ligament load for mid-knee flexion of 15°-75° was analyzed vs proximal-distal implant position, implant size, implant design, and knee flexion for PS and CR knees. Posterior cruciate ligament load was also analyzed for CR knees. RESULTS: Total tibiofemoral ligament load was significantly reduced by a more proximal tibiofemoral and anterior femur position (P < .001). Implant size did not have a significant effect on tibiofemoral ligament load (P > .1). Implant design and knee flexion significantly influenced total tibiofemoral ligament load (P < .001), but the interactions with implant proximal-distal position were not significant (P > .2), indicating that implant proximal-distal position had a similar effect across the 15°-75° knee flexion range for both studied PS and CR implant designs. CONCLUSION: PS and CR TKA can be well-balanced at 0° and 90° knee flexion and have instability in mid-flexion. Elevating the joint line and shifting the femur anteriorly can cause the knee to be too loose in mid-flexion.